Where is Time?

door.jpg

 

"We have never encountered poor engineering in nature" --Albrecht-Buehler

 

It's 1978 and I'm sitting at a workbench, electronic test equipment arrayed all around me on shelves -- oscilloscopes and 'bit boxes', the tools of my trade.   It's the night shift and the factory is 'cooling fan' quiet, almost like sitting in my living room -- at least in comparison to the buzzing of the day shift when the isles are full of managers and engineers...  office types, disturbing my otherwise silent technical devotions.   And just like in my living room, I light up a 'righteous' cigarette and lean back on my swiveling chair, contemplating a problem with a printed circuit board I'm troubleshooting -- trying to put some 'soul in the machine' -- but it won't initialize -- stuck in a loop. I take a puff (menthols!) and exhale up toward the high industrial ceiling. When my eyes come back to the problem I glance at the scope and notice a straight line on the screen but one that is fuzzy somehow -- they are never really straight. Only moments before it had been an incomprehensible blur, racing at megahertz speed and I had barely been able to sync it up so as to bring the blur into focus. Now, as I rest the probe at my side the screen is quiet -- in keeping with my surroundings -- relaxed at 'zero' volts.

It is my habit when I am stuck -- when I have no place left to look -- to absently rub my thumb back and forth across the tip of the scopes probe as if rubbing a genie bottle -- unconsciously 'wishing' perhaps that an answer will pop into my head. Whenever I practice this ritual the line will jump and its tiny, unseen curves are amplified somehow -- you can see it. The 'fuzz' gets louder. The dance of this noise distracts me somehow -- mesmerizes me into neutral like a brief 'reset', for a moment, till I'm ready to take up the loop again. Loops are the worst... no hooks to get a handle on. The rack of unfixed boards on the shelf behind me is predictably full of the ones with loops -- cut to ribbons with exacto knives in futile attempts to isolate the problem. No one likes them. They are always saved for last, undesirable scraps set aside for nights like this when the work flow slows to a trickle and we have nothing else to do.

When I'm done with my smoke I lean forward and place the tip of the probe on the lower right pin of a 16 pin chip... the ground pin (Earth!) and it jumps again. Noise. Same noise. It's everywhere.

Fast forward about 25 years and I'm sitting in my cube -- I am an 'office type' now (tobacco free!... and no degree!) and an email has arrived on my UNIX workstation from an author whom I have been in intermittent contact with about esoteric topics that occasionally pop into my mind  -- when I'm stuck. It's a sort of 'smoke break' to distract me from my otherwise absorbing design gig.  He's sent a link -- a link to a scientific paper -- a paper about noise. Noise... and the brain!

Timeout.

It's written by a researcher from a prestigious university and it's the usual incoherent 'code talking‘ (to the unwashed like myself) but one phrase jumps out at me like a left hook and I flinch -- it's the essential point of the whole paper, boiled down to one very uncharacteristically brief little sound byte -- a sort of Sesame Street moment in an otherwise convoluted read.  The brain, according to this distinguished professor... feeds on noise... pigs out on it in fact... can't operate without it! Slops it up and spits it out as signals -- signals in the AM & FM bands -- like a damn TV!  And like a contented cow, it grazes all day (and night!) -- not in a field of clover... but in a field of noise!

As it turns out, the brain and I had not been on speaking terms for some years now for I had been singing the praises of 'energy' to anyone who would listen. Any mention of anything thicker than a nadi was dismissed in my steel trapped mind as an artifact of the primary subtle source code and as such, an irrelevant distraction -- not worthy of my valuable time. But here was something that hit home in a way that I couldn't dismiss... I mean this was engineering... or more accurately, reverse engineering.  It was right in my under educated wheelhouse, in a language I could relate to. Suddenly, in my mind, the brain had been 'elevated' somehow.  No longer so easily dismissed, it was now an 'organ of respect!' -- an unbelievably sophisticated and counterintuitive bio-electric genius, its underlying mechanism having gone under reported in an otherwise 'Big-Pharma's' field.    And it had been doing a 'rope a dope' -- with noise! the scourge of the electronics world, right 'under' my nose the whole time... Damn!  I was impressed!

And in addition this paper just happened to come complete with a handy Block Diagram -- just like the ones on my desk. And like all block diagrams this one had something that was visually revealing about it -- but not so much in what it 'said' -- but in what it didn‘t ‘say'.  The brain, according to the usual suspects (i.e., the experts) was supposed to be the storehouse of memory -- of all memories.  Except this diagram had no large scale caches -- only 'data paths' (parallel bus's) and multiplexers! (millions to one!).  It was all about movement and feedback (i.e., amplification and signal conditioning) not massive static storage.  And like any good multiplexer it funneled down each of the many neurons' massively parallel signals into individual serial signals -- ones that we could, potentially (I would assume!) "select"... and "see!"... and "hear!"

Yikes!  Somebody change the channel!!   This was too much...

Or was it?

Rewind to a few years earlier -- stuck again! -- and I had come across an article by a Phd by the name of James L. Oschman, author of the ground breaking book Energy Medicine -- The Scientific Basis. Oschman was a biologist who'd done a tour at the prestigious Wood‘s Hole Oceanographic Institute and he was describing his own metamorphosis from a traditional western scientific view to what could only be described as a full blown empirically derived 'energy view' of the human body-mind (and cosmos).  All of this had been precipitated by an aching back which had led him, eventually, to a paradigm changing encounter with a practitioner of the art of Rolfing who took the time to bring him up to speed on the subtle world.  Fascinated, he took it upon himself to unearth the scientific evidence to substantiate it all and it turned out to be voluminous. For the newly initiated Oschman, the scalability and intelligence of this amazing 'human energy system' was elegance itself -- a thing to behold, but he was curious why there was no talk of it in the scientific community.  Eventually he found himself contemplating a sort of 'McKenna's Dilemma' -- no one else seemed to want it!  He was alone in line at the Buffet!  And to 'top' it all off, despite all the 'Surf & Turf' on his plate, he found that it all 'boiled' down to water.

As it turns out, one of Oschman's colleagues at 'the Hole' was a Hungarian scientist of worldwide repute by the name of Albert Szent-Gyorgyi, the discoverer of vitamin C.  It was Szent-Gyorgyi who initially postulated that proteins are more than just 'proteins' but only when saturated with water, at which point -- like biological comic book Super Heros -- they 'transform' into semiconductors! His observation was that water, a conductor, was what made electrons (energy!) mobile throughout the body's intricate collagen network (protein!) and that this was responsible for the flexibility, speed and subtlety that combined to help facilitate what he referred to as the 'living state'. And this network reached into literally every single one of our cells, right down to our DNA.  So the body not only had a 'wireless' network but collagen 'land lines' as well! His term for this dynamic combination was 'Electronic Biology' and Oschman referred to his discovery of this system thusly:

Breakthroughs in cell biology now enable us to describe the scientific basis of this system. The first of these breakthroughs was the discovery that the molecules of which the body is formed are semiconductors. Conductors, such as the wires that go to a light or a toaster, carry useful energy. The wire to your telephone carries information. Semiconductors can convey both energy and information, and can do other things as well. Semiconductors are used to store information and to process signals -- to make choices or decisions. Semiconductors are used to make sensitive detectors of energy fields. Semiconductors can transport large amounts of power. Semiconductors are the essential components of our modern electronics industry, and make possible the miracle of the computer we are using to write this article.

In living systems, semiconductors probably play the same roles we have assigned to them in our technology. Living systems undoubtedly have developed additional tricks that have not yet been discovered by the electronics industry.

I had been contemplating this technological stew for a number of years when one more juicy ingredient arrived on my laptop in the form of a link to a video called "Thunderbolts of the Gods".  It was about a theory that the 'quantumized' and sterile, disconnected 'gravity in a vacuum' idea of the cosmos (with mysterious spots of so called "dark energy" lurking about) is a 'dead short' so to speak. This 'new' view of the cosmos is actually a hundred years old and is referred to as the 'Electric Universe' and it talks of a ubiquitous primal universal force trillions of times more powerful than 'gravity' (and a lot less mysterious) -- i.e.,  electricity.  Nice... And of course, where there is electricity there is magnetism ("for every force there is an equal and opposite...")  Nice...  And as it turns out, all the billowing clouds of 'stuff' out there have the qualities of plasma which is a nebulous fourth state of matter where particles are suspended in a soup of free floating electrons (i.e., energy) -- perfect for the conduction of electric currents.  No dry 'dust', these currents have a name -- Birkeland currents -- and they have been recorded for decades.  And these currents travel through space primarily in paths that resemble 'twisted pair' wires (long preferred in the computer industry for their ideal conducting properties) -- i.e., they are spiraling! -- like our DNA. And these currents form a huge network -- literally -- between all the planets and stars in the Universe like some kind of crazy cosmic web (imagine that!). So it's alive... it's electric... and the whole thing is buzzing like Yankee Stadium on opening day!  And the entire model is completely scalable and has been reproduced in supercomputers that can replicate the whole process while it forms spiraling galaxies -- something the standard model has never been able to do. Imagine that!

So it was all coming together 'nicely' now... electromagnetic signals in the mind coursing through an electromagnetic body inside an electromagnetic cosmos.  Electromagnetic universe, electromagnetic mind, electromagnetic body!  Waves, waves, waves!  It's a veritable sea of noise... one big Cymatic cacophony of a world, all joined together through a single ubiquitous universal web -- complete with user friendly 'wireless' and 'hard wired' connections at every level. It's a Wide Wide Wired World...  the World Wide E-web...  wired from the furthest galaxy right down to our teeth!... now imagine that!

The Gods must be smiling.

 

Now it's difficult to talk of time -- as we know it -- without talking about space -- as we know it.  Although in the end, both may be subsets of absolute Time and absolute Space, the point of this discussion is to analyze the former as the latter is beyond words and quite frankly, not an obstacle to understanding in the way that time and space (as we know it) have become.  In fact, the answer lies in the absolute but in order to get to the answer it first helps to define the problem -- or at least come up with a useful abstract working model of the problem to be used to turn over the crust of confusion and reveal the fertile top soil of reality.  Concepts are useful in defining the problem. After that, the answers tend to get revealed by themselves.

One such method for turning soil is to employ a 'thought experiment'.  A thought experiment is not a statement of empirical fact but a means of employing useful imagination to uncover possible hidden mechanisms (i.e., moving parts) which could then be assembled in the mind as a sort of working model which can then be employed by the mind as a visualization tool.  It's what virtual reality used to be.  It's an experiment with imagination instead of a test tube.  But instead of gathering data, we're gathering possibilities.  So when we employ a thought experiment we are still quite possibly a long way from the facts but one has to start somewhere and that is especially so in this case as there is scant empirical evidence to begin with. Time -- as we know it -- is short on hooks and handles.

One major obstacle that a seeker encounters in uncovering the absolute is that the individual has to deal with a layer of paradox which is created by the limited view of the intellect.  Without an overlay of intuition the intellect simply isn't up to the job of 'understanding' as true understanding includes a simultaneous view of both the temporal and the absolute which by default resolves the misunderstandings of the intellect with the non-verbal knowing 'overview' of one's being. You could say that intuition, like water, fills in the 'cracks between concepts'... connecting 'things'... so to speak.  So our model will attempt to address this symbiotic relationship.

According to at least one ancient occult view, time was tied only indirectly to space.  Temporal time, to these ancients, was the mind's interpretation of movement in space which is a slightly different view than the contemporary one but it's the one that we'll employ here. As it turns out, the contemporary and the ancient may be closer than they first appear.

Any seeker who has had even an inkling of a 'timeless' moment knows that movement continues in spite of the apparent absence of 'time'. So it would appear that movement in space is a trigger -- it triggers an assumption in the mind which we interpret as 'time'. Thus the oft-referred to 'continuous moment of timelessness' would be, in our model, one where movement 'continues' in the absence of this assumption about time.

In order to help decouple movement from time in our minds though it will help to redefine it and in this case we'll rename movement and instead, refer to it as a 'sequence'.   So timelessness -- as we know it -- could then also be defined as a 'continuous moment' when all 'sequences' in space have been 'decoupled' in the mind from the assumption of 'time' as we know it. This will be a primary assumption in our experiment.

If the world as we know it is based on waves then it might be useful to make another assumption, for our model's sake, and that is that space (as we know it ) is also a wave.  So our experience of it would then be the mind's interpretation of a wave-like phenomenon, except this wave only takes 'shape' so to speak in the brain. But these are not just ‘waves' -- they carry information -- information that is modulated onto them -- like in the AM & FM bands. Such waves that carry modulated information are called carrier waves, so in our experiment we are going to refer to space (as we know it) as a primary carrier wave produced inside the brain.

One reason carrier waves were developed was to distinguish one signal from another when they shared a common conductor by giving each piece of 'information' on that conductor its own unique 'carrier' frequency -- as in a telephone line or modem.  Thus the carrier waves of 'space' in our model would serve to distinguish one sequence from another by not only creating 'space' between individual competing sequences but also by helping to create a series of sequences -- with 'spaces' between them, so to speak. Thus sequences as we know them, whether in the guise of thoughts or images, would be the modulation of information waves onto the primary carrier waves of 'space' -- as we know it -- inside the brain.  Also, in our model, this innumerable sea of sequences (information waves) outside the brain would then be referred to as noise... a field of noise -- Cloud computing if you will... like an electromagnetic fog.

So if we look back on what we've seen and discussed so far, it appears that the brain has a genius for creating modulated serial signals -- in the AM & FM bands -- from a sea of noise. Thus it takes a massively parallel phenomena (noise) and creates from it a set of sequences which are offered up to us -- in series -- as movement... movement in the form of a series of thoughts and images. And it is this presentation of the information in series -- that gives the impression of a 'series of sequences' in our mind -- like a damn TV.   So in our model we'll assume that the mind in its reasoning mode has little choice but to interpret this sequence as such.   Only one thing then, in our model, can override such an overwhelming presentation and that is to reintroduce noise back into the sequence -- in parallel with the sequence... massively parallel noise in the form of knowing, timeless intuition introduced into the mix as an 'overlay' of higher perception.  Since the sequence appears to be a product of the neural net we can assume that we can't look to it for help here so this introduction of noise would have to come from an independent agent of the brain.  So we'll say that this agent -- or backdoor savior -- is something like the pineal gland, which no doubt has its own twist on things.  Thus in our model, this noise would then be re-introduced on the 'back end of the process', downstream of the neural network where the original noise was 'sifted' and then presented as a series of sequences.  So the pineal gland would then be 'rope a doping' the sequence... so to speak... in our model.

So in our experiment, when left to its own devices, the mind has no choice but to interpret the serial presentation of sequences as a sequence in serial time.  And the only thing that can overrule this logic is an introduction of something so overwhelming that the mind has no choice but to drop its assumption about this serial sequence of time and bow to the truth of the situation.

Thus in our model, the default reasoning of the mind's interpretation of the sequence as serial time can -- at times, be 'overshadowed' by the overwhelming evidence of the timeless knowing which is the default mode of the massively parallel noise of the world beyond the narrow multiplexing funnel of the neurons.  Belief (and doubt!) would then be a product of the 'series' and 'knowing' a product of the noise.  So knowing would, by its massively panoramic nature, 'trump' serial belief (and doubt!) and put it in it's proper perspective, while leaving the sequence of thoughts and images intact.  Thus when the noise is present (on the backend of the process) we would 'see through' the belief in the sequence even while making practical use of it.  We're not fooled by it. So when working in parallel with both the sequence and the panoramic noise, the necessary belief in the useful everyday things we need to have presented to us as a sequence would be 'seen through', so to speak, by the knowing timeless noise of the greater universal mind, while still being put to use, for practical purposes.  You could call this multidimensional experience a form of 'moving meditation' or a 'continuous moment' of real time. Nice.

Now so called 'movement' in the sequence is a relative term as noise itself is movement.  But the difference is that when the highly amplified series of sequences is exclusively presented it naturally gets our undivided attention.  The squeaky wheel gets the grease.  So in the brain, our attention is compelled to focus exclusively on the highly amplified series of sequences -- like a damn TV -- whereas in the vast sea of noise our attention would be diffused across the entire vista. So in our model, it's the exclusive attention on the amplified, high amplitude squeaky wheel of the serial sequence that creates the single minded impression of time -- as we know it.  Likewise, any diffusion of attention over the vast sea of noise would disperse this single minded focus and create a much 'broader' view... a more 'timeless' view.  So when the two are occurring simultaneously -- as in our description of a walking meditation -- we would have the impression of being 'in the world, but not of it'... so to speak.   That is... in our model.

Thus in a way 'time' (as we know it) and 'space' (as we know it) would go hand in hand in our minds like 'fellow travelers‘. One is tied inevitably to the other -- but one is not necessarily the other.

And all of this happens... 'between the ears', so to speak, because in our model, it doesn't matter what we see and what we hear 'out there' ---- it's what we think and what we imagine 'in here'.   You see, when it comes to time -- as we know it -- we don't "know it" at all... not  the way it actually is... just the way we think it is.  And what we 'think'... what we assume... is what we believe.  And what we believe is a direct result of what we place our single minded inner attention on... and then we project that out... onto whatever we place our outer attention on.

So to the ones with the 'eyes to see' everything that happens 'out there' is happening in a single moment of time.  Thus these 'ones' see a multiplicity of movement occurring in a 'Singular time'... whereas we see a series of movements -- and equate that with a series of times.  Likewise, such ones may or may not see wondrous things, with their eyes... but they would all see through things... with the 'eye of knowing' -- in real time -- the only time there is.

So ironically, in our model, the brain would, in a sense, be a... "Time Machine".   Only not in the way we normally think of it. It would be responsible for time 'as we know it'... but that doesn't have to prevent 'that which attends' from seeing time... as it is.

We live in a divided world... one of conflicting beliefs and confusion, doubt and double messages.  We can't seem to concentrate on anything anymore for more than a moment.   And that's just between the ears.   Even our attention is divided (think about that).  It's a prescription for distraction... by design.  In fact, in our model, this world wasn't just ‘designed‘ for distraction... it was engineered that way.   So is it any wonder we don't know what time is?

 

Technology (as we know it) has become a beast of mythic proportions.  Like a many headed Cyclopian Hydra, it is often seen as a ubiquitous 'all seeing eye' from hell that is portrayed (via technology!!) as a transistorized vehicle for the death of us all (even at times to some of those who helped to design it).   And not for 'no good' reason -- dealing with its health effects alone has become like a second job for many, even while we use it to search the world -- and the web, for the latest remedy.  It's enough to 'drive' you crazy.   It contributes to every major problem of the modern world (and some solutions!!)... while seeping into every pore of our existence... into our very own 'wireless networks' and the 'land lines' to our DNA!    It's a 'fix' to fix us and a fix for our 'fix'!   A loop!   (like the mind!!)   Damn!

But there is an another view of technology that says that technology's real purpose is not 'just' to torture us... that its creation is our attempt to simultaneously reveal our selves to our selves... like a self created late model demon.   Thus if seen correctly, it ceases to become just 'the problem' and instead it then has the potential to transform itself before our eyes into a lesson book -- from our selves to our selves (from our 'engineer'... to our 'engineer'!!!) about the hooks and handles inside us and the universe around us... a mirror of the mechanism of our perpetual dilemma.   As such, when seen correctly, technology (and our universe) can become a tool for liberation from the unconscious mechanical patterns that are the fabric of our habits.   And the first step in breaking any habit is awareness of the habit... and then of its mechanisms.   Loops can be instructive.   They do have a message.   And they can be 'rope a doped'... with inner attention.

The ancients taught that gazing at the world correctly was a spiritual practice, especially  when the universe was viewed the way it truly is. This is why we are attracted to its mysteries even while attempting to shove it all away.  So with 2012 approaching and the looming possibility of the end of time -- as we think we know it  -- perhaps we have something to look forward to after all... in a time that‘s larger than any loop.

 

Postscript

For an excellent look at the chemical side of the brain (which I conveniently brushed under the rug!) as well as the effects of electromagnetic fields on the brain click here. The piece appeared  recently on Reality Sandwich and it is an excerpt from the book "Revolution 2012" by Dieter Broers called "2012" and Electromagnetic Effects on Consciousness.   It raises many excellent points outside the narrow scope of this piece including possible future electromagnetic Solar scenarios in 2012 and sage advice on how to prepare for them.

Another point conveniently ignored in this piece is the 'past' and 'future' (oh that!).  I can only offer up my own individual opinion for what it's worth and that is that in our model here, both would then be seen as being 'simultaneously and continuously' available to the individual amongst the panoramic noise of Mind at Large at any given moment in 'real time'.   More on that, perhaps at another 'time'.

And to carry the model to the next level, as in 'out of body' experiences, one could speculate that in cases such as Robert Monroe's instantaneous 'thought ball' transmissions, the usual 'serial thought sequences' experienced inside the body would then have been 'massively short circuited' so to speak, outside the body... by instantaneously available 'massively panoramic noise' that is no longer sifted by the neural networks in the brain.  Examples of this abound such as in the cases where individuals outside the body report hearing the thoughts of several individuals simultaneously and on up to universal consciousness.  In other cases, such as in the classic Autobiography of a Yogi by Paramhansa Yogananda, chapter 43... "The Resurrection of Sri Yukteswar" he gives an example of how a potential temporarily manifested 'subtle body brain' might work as well as in other anecdotes scattered through the narrative such as the bi-location of one particular yogi, (not to mention the ubiquitous presence of the ethereal Babaji) a feat not unheard of in the literature of India, as well as in other cultures around the world. Perhaps the difference would be determined by the conscious intent and experience of the individual.  But this would be pure speculation on my part.

For some interesting links on space as a wave and time as motion see the GOOGLE search on the topic...  The WSM pages (Wave Structure of Matter) include an Aristotle quote implying that time is either the equivalent of motion or some 'effect' of it.  Nice... There is also the proposition that all motion (time) are waves of and in space thus you could make an argument that all waves in space are essentially 'modulated' onto space itself, merely by their existence as space itself would be the 'common carrier'.  There isn't room here obviously to dissect all of that but clearly in this model the terms 'modulation' and 'carrier' are relative terms!  To conclude, we could speculate here that 'timelessness' then is the experience of a 'massively diffused panoramic inner attention' which overshadows the singular impression of time as we know it, while we're enjoying -- or consciously suffering through -- the outer sequences in all their amazing varieties.  It's simple.  (Whooa!)

Note:  In our model. the degree to which belief (and doubt!) would reign over knowing would then be known as the 'sequence to noise' ratio.  Thus degrees of awareness would be a fluctuating 'analog function' -- and not some static state -- except... in the ultimate  ‘state'... wherever that is.

 

The Wave Structure of Matter pages are found here

 

Note:  Another interesting 'view' from the point of view of our model comes from Robert Monroe and his 'Focus levels' as a means of altering our perception of time, space and other dimensions.   See the Overview of Focus levels from their website here.

 

One last 'loose end' to tie is the implication of this 'Electric Universe' and its ubiquitous web of currents -- from the furthest Galaxy right down to our DNA!   More on that as well at another 'time' as it is a subject with vast implications in every area of our existence and there is no way to do it justice in this piece.  In fact, just to even contemplate it is enough to 'drop ones jaw'... so to speak.  To be continued...

 

Note:   If the reader takes exception to my characterization of the standard model of the Universe that's understandable.  It's just that I was never quite able to wrap my mind around it in a way that left me smiling.  Since then I have put together a short list of qualifications that I filter any cosmological theory through and that is this:   Is it simple?  (Occam's razor and common sense);   Is it scalable?  (as above so below);    Is it satisfying? (moi!).   The Electric Universe fits all 3 IMO so I'm 'satisfied' with it for now.   In fact I could even add a fourth:  Does it spiral?   but in interest of 'simplicity' I'll leave it at 3.  No doubt I'm not the first to come up with such a cosmological 'short list' as all 'roads' seem to lead to it eventually.

The DVD on the Electric Universe mentioned above, "Thunderbolts of the Gods" can be found here, along with other excellent DVD's on this subject.

For an excellent website on the Plasma Cosmos see here

 

Note:  I've lost touch with the original paper about noise and the brain but several follow up studies are out there.  So if you look for them online you may want to keep in mind that many are in Adobe pdf format.  Also in your string search you'll want to include the phrase "stochastic resonance" as this is a key to understanding how noise works in the brain and possibly as a factor in Cymatics as well.  It's also important to note that there is a fine distinction (in my mind) between noise in the brain and the noise of Mind at large.  The noise in the brain would then be -- in our model -- an intermediate step between the panoramic noise of Mind at large and the serial sequence.  See GOOGLE search.

 

Note:  To say that James Oschman was 'alone at the Buffet'... well, I would have to qualify that as clearly he is reporting a slew of evidence reported by other interested and courageous scientists.  But where he stands alone is in his reminding us of it all by compiling these discoveries in one place and reporting on them in a comprehensive fashion with language that the layperson can relate to.   In doing so he placed a very bright spotlight on a field that had nearly been scattered to the winds by the power of conventional science to ignore it.

The quote by Albrecht-Buehler found at the head of this piece was from page 189 of James L' Oschman's book Energy Medicine -- the Scientific Basis.

The quote about water and proteins forming semiconductors came from an article by James and Nora Oschamn called "How Healing Energy Works".  In it they also mention that Albert Szent-Gyorgyi received the Nobel for his discovery of vitamin C.   They also employ a slew of technological analogies in their model of the human energy system. See here.

For an excellent interview with James Oschman see here.

For an interesting look at the conventional western scientific view of the purpose of water in "proteins" see here

Although I use TV as a loose analogy in this piece,  the quote below is interesting as both AM & FM signals would need to be present in Analog TV -- as are present simultaneously in the brain... kinda makes ya' wonder!

"Analog TV uses an amplitude-modulated (AM) signal for pictures and frequency modulation (FM) for audio."

 

The seekers 'double-life' dilemma between thought and being -- the path of Reason -- was summarized by Paul Cash in the quotes below from an article called 'Beyond the Maps'.   It was written as a posthumous tribute to Paul Brunton, one of the early proponents of Yoga in the West....

"One of Brunton's most frequently repeated themes is that the thinker within us and the mystic within us need each other desperately: both the ability to think deeply with great precision and the ability to withdraw at will from thinking must be cultivated. And, most importantly to the philosophic approach, all must be turned in the direction of altruistic service to humanity at large."

In the same piece, Cash gives an example of Brunton's direct view of the 'practical mystical' state which he often referred to as an experience of the continuous presence of the 'Overself'...

"The mystical stages of this process involve a gradual displacement of the individual's mind's exclusive fascination with its own thoughts as 'the whole of one's identity' shifts to a higher plane. When this displacement is complete, or in parallel with its development, the philosophic stage begins. This stage involves reembracing of the thinking processes in a radically different way by a vastly deepened continuous self-awareness."

See here.

The Notebooks of Paul Brunton can be found here.  

 


Endless...

 

Time... endless time...

no excuse.

Long train running... no caboose!

Thought not the problem... attention the key.

Un-trained attention... running over me!

Retraction of attention from report card on I

produces space... endless space...

for train of whole new dimension!

 

And finally... 'Where is time?'   Well, if it's like everything else... it's probably going to be found in the last place we'd ever think to look for it!

 

Image by frostnova, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

 

Comments

Robert McCoy

Robert McCoy here... for an excellent example of a continuous timeless "moment" scroll down to the section in the link below  sub-titled  "November 6, Varanasi Days".  The first section below that down to where he talks about the "Open Secret" is a classic "real time" report IMO...  Whenever I read this it's like the power of Varanasi and the Ganges comes right through the web like a radionic vibe and puts me right 'there'... it's amazing. 

http://www.heartspace.org/travel/varanasi2.html

 

RE to synchronicity

 No, not in this case.  This piece was a deliberately focused article and as such it left alot untouched.  It had to be that way as it took long enough to say what it did eventually say.   There is just no way to touch on most or even every aspect of time in an article.  The subject is just too broad and deep.  So this piece was never meant to be the last word on time - only to shed light on one possible view of it and that is the view 'from' timelessness.

 In my mind, time can not be understood unless the individual is at least willing to look at it from the point of view of "timelessness" which is a universal human experience.   For one it offers a unique perspective that no other angle on time can give.   As such it is a 'reverse engineering' of time from the perspective of the experiencer which offers up IMO the possibility of a detached counter-intuitive view of the subject that is not available from an 'immersion' model which is more typical.

 As for Morphic fields, I assume you've already covered that topic to some degree on your own, however I might point you to an earlier piece I wrote for this site called "Who Needs the Higgs" - it's at the link below...  it touches on energy in a way that helps when thinking of it in terms of mind connectivity IMO.  I will be talking about mind field connectivity in a future piece but where that leads to in terms of time is just a guess right now as I've only scratched the surface in my mind.

http://www.realitysandwich.com/freaks_view_universe

 Also, if you are interested, you may want to look into Biogeometry on Dr Ibrahim Karim's site below if you haven't already...

http://www.biogeometry.com/english/

  To me, his work touches on morphic fields in a way that is not normally associated with the topic and as such is helpful IMO.

  My apologies if that is not satisfactory.   I appreciate your asking.  

RE Speed

 Nothing on clocks or cycles - its all loops.  Other people can take that on.   As for wave/particle again I refer you to "Who Needs the Higgs". 

2012

Robert, can you please tell me what is your opinion on the 2012 subject? I noticed that has special meaning for you. I will apreciate if you share some web links that resonates with your approach on this subject. (excuse my english) Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

RE to enk

 Your English is fine... excellent in fact.   I have no particular site that I gravitate to on the 2012 stuff - I just pick and choose around the web a bit.   Its such a tough subject to get a handle on - worse than Time!   But I do suspect that there will be some portion of the population that will have breakthroughs to higher awareness due to the energetic environment -- but it may just as well irritate others as well.   We all respond to energy in differnt ways so its hard to tell.   But Big Energy is coming our way and we ALL respond to energy - so its a no brainer in that regard.  And since the earth responds to energy as well... well, you can see where this is going.  

 If I could recommend one book as an example of spiritual people coping with a massive societal change I would recommend Ouspensky's "In Search of the Miraculous"  - to me its the ultimate "2012" survival book even though it took place almost 90 years ago.  See link below...

 http://www.amazon.com/Search-Miraculous-Harvest-Book/dp/0156007460/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1308410504&sr=1-1

 Thanks for the question... please feel free to follow up with another comment if this doesn't satisfy you and I'll do my best to go deeper if I have to on this...

2012 follow up

I read that book several years ago, perhaps I'll return to it :). 

My view about this subject resonate with this author: http://www.susanrennison.com/Index_Joyfire_Planetary_Challenges.htm ,(electric universe, electromagnetism, space weather drives biological changes etc. ), what do you think? 

I also like this author (from Reality Sandwich): Dieter Broers (http://www.realitysandwich.com/2012_and_electromagnetic_effects_consciousness ) 

I would love to hear your opinion on this topic (2012), maybe you will write about it in detail in a future article. I am more interested in the practical aspects, i mean what can I do to be prepared somehow? 

Thank you for response. 

RE

 Yes - I still re-read 'In Search" from time to time as it's a classic and G talks directly to 2012 IMO - in fact directly in at least one case.  The whole story is like an analogy for our times.  They set a great example of how to transcend the times in spite of great and even tragic losses - tough to do... a great Test and Opportunity.   G was not perfect in that story and he made mistakes during that time but he got through it without complaint while carrying the lives of others on his back.   Quite a feat IMO.

 I just looked at the Susan Joy Rennison site for the first time so I can't speak from first hand knowledge - only from what I see in her table of Contents to her book and I like what I see.  Anyone who correlates Big Picture energetic patterns is someone who sees the Big Picture and has some perspective on things here.  So I like that.   None of us are immune to these energies as we are ALL bathed in them - even Baptized in them - so we are all struggling with them from birth.   And they shape the 'person' in us and tweak our 'person' IMO which is what astrology is about.  

 As far as 2012, the good and bad news is that we have the same Test/Opportunity facing us today that they had back then only it's on a Global scale (or bigger?)  So every time I screw up on a personal level the acknowledgement of that to myself takes 'me down' a peg and gives me another opportunity --- and that is to have some compassion for the next guy to screw up.  And that compassion ratchets one up ever so slightly into a view that has the potential to rise above the personal.

 So to me 2012 is an unparalleled opportunity to take our personal shortcomings and challenges and mulch them into a larger transpersonal view.   Transmuting negative energies in our selves and our environment is a big part of what spiritual work is about so this is fertile ground for that.   And hopefully when it's all said and done we are all alot better off for the experience.  

PS - see my reference to Dieters article and book in the Postscript to the Time article - I haven't read the book but his article makes sense to me and gives sage advice on how to prepare for 2012... as does this site IMO.

PSS - BTW you mentioned practical help for 2012 - the best thing I've ever come across in my search is Hatha Yoga.  IMO nothing evens out the stress of this 'Season of 2012' than yoga and it works immediately - not tomorrow - from the first session.  I only have a Level 1 practice but I practice just about daily when I can and it's a game changer IMO.  If you already have a yoga practice then you have as solid a foundation as you could hope for IMO.   If not, it's never too late to start.

Thanks for the reply Robert

Thanks for the reply Robert and I look forward to reading your next article (maybe you will start your own blog).

 

metamorphosis

The Scientific Basis. Oschman was a biologist who'd done a tour at the  Web Design Berkshire prestigious Wood‘s Hole Oceanographic Institute and he was describing his own metamorphosis from a traditional western scientific view to what could only be described as a full blown empirically derived 'energy view' of the human body-mind (and cosmos).  

RE to rajajuju

 LoLaughs... it reminds me of a lady who, upon reading a version of my "Who Needs the Higgs" article in England referred to me as "an enemy of Humanity!".   You haven't lived till you've been called that!   So I guess I have nowhere to go but Up!  

 This comment by "rajajuju" is really valuable feedback as I think we all need to contemplate the possibility of harboring our own anti-christ within in the form of a resentful 'personalized ego'.   We all have one to some degree and none of us (moi!) are immune to it's acting out,... so to speak.

 Thanks again for this comment...  it's an excellent reminder IMO of the dangers we all face... from within.

Rajajuju - Comments Guidelines

Hi Rajajuju, I just wanted to send you a reminder about our comments guidelines as a couple of your comments waver on breaking them. Please try to stay on topic and avoid using profanity if you can. See the list of guidelines below. Thanks,

Comments Guidelines

Reality Sandwich is dedicated to creating a web platform that encourages dynamic thought, lively discussion, and vibrant self-expression for our diverse community. In order to ensure that everyone's voices are heard in a fair manner, we ask that you follow the basic guidelines listed below.

Be Respectful

Find ways to disagree respectfully. If your behavior is offensive to others, Reality Sandwich reserves the right to delete your posts and/or ban you from the site. Harassing or threatening other members will not be tolerated.

Keep It Clean

Reality Sandwich discourages the use of profanity or obscenities on the site. There are other interesting ways of expressing your thoughts and we also want the kiddies to check out what we're up to.

No Yelling

Using all capital letters in a post is considered "yelling" online. Shouting doesn't give more substance to what you're posting, so please keep the voice down when posting.

No Spam

Reality Sandwich is a community of people collaborating to make a better world. It is not a place for hawking wares.

Stay on Topic

Please refrain from putting up irrelevant public gestures or extraneous "comments graffiti" when commenting on posts.

Help Us Build a Self-monitoring Community

A red "report this" link appears under comments and posts on Reality Sandwich. Please use these buttons to alert the Evolver crew of any material that violates our Community Guidelines or the Terms of Use, or is otherwise inappropriate.

Pause Before Sending

If you feel strongly about a topic, take some time to consider your words carefully, and then respond respectfully. Be constructive and offer others your thoughts, ideas, and experiences, rather than using sarcastic or belittling language.

Where is time

Hey Robert: Well-written article – it has to be for me to follow it. (After 4 re-reads.) Having experienced some of the phenomena cited in your article (I think most Reality Sandwich readers ‘know’ those phenomena), your threads are – if not entirely transparent to me, at least not entirely opaque. As you pointed out, the concepts are ancient – different times, different techno-speak. But there is always something ‘missing’. (Don’t get the wrong idea – it’s missing for me! Not ‘missing’ in your effort.) No matter the language, no matter the word-play, no matter the strength of intuition – the ‘unknowable’ remains 99.99% of my illusionary reality. The more I read these articles, the greater the ‘unknowable’ portion grows. Funny thing, I don’t seem to mind. Maybe when the ‘unknowable’ hits 100%, I will have arrived. But dealing with the ‘knowable’ part, it seems to me that the ‘time’ you are addressing is a function of a person’s age and ‘nature’ – nature being word-play for something like karmic-age. Young people & Amish communities have no use for the time you cite, and I wouldn’t like a universe which would impose this reality on people before they are ready. ‘Time’ seems to make itself known to all who want it. I even found it to a gentle entity – a whisper, not a roar. Moreover, it doesn’t seem to want to segregate itself from other things which, only a year ago, I could not have imagined. And while our particular brand of technology may open some doors, it doesn’t seem unique in doing so. Thanks again. And bear with me, I have too say this …Here’s to you Elvira. No-one’s loved ya half as much as they shouldda!

RE Redporch

 Wow... thats a 'poetic' comment so I won't even attempt to 'reply' in the conventional sense.  If I had one wish as to how we would view 'time' going forward it would be that 'time' is not so much a flowing river as it is the 'Singular Environment' in which all streams are flowing.  

 If so, then in order to recognize this as such we will have to completely re-define the past and the present and the future outside of terms that are misleading.   Our problem with 'time' IMO is not with 'time' itself.   The problem is with mis-labeling simultaneously occuring processes that come to our attention in a linear fashion.   So we project our limitations of perception onto  processes that all occur in a singular 'time'.   So language is the problem - not 'time'.   We can't understand it because we are labeling processes happening "In" time...  "As" time.

 In the first comment after the end of the article I pointed to a passage that describes this 'Open Secret' in language that is unmistakable - If you haven't read it yet I believe you will enjoy it.

Thoughts on the comments

These are all very good points, Robert and all.  I'd like to respond to several of them.  I believe that some of the ideas of quantum physics, of shamanism, of Gurdjieff and of Castaneda's don Juan will help sort them out.

1.  The "singular environment in which all streams flow" would correspond to the 'nagual' - the field in which nothing is defined, and yet still exists (an alternate view of The Void.)  Then the fields in which sequences and labels are needed for definition and operation would correspond to don Juan's 'tonals' (actually, a separate tonal for each perspective and "assemblage-point position") which, it turns out, can be created, manipulated, or extinguished with enough "sorceric power." This seems quite analogous with quantum transformations.

2. "Simultaneously occurring processes" actually do NOT come to our attention in linear fashion -- we simply re-engineer them as if having been linear; this allows us to "edit out" the supernatural matrix (metaphorically, the qualities of "empty space" which have been discussed here) from which  each simultaneous impression derives -- and I posit that they are ALL simultaneous!  By stopping (or de-emphasizing) the labelling mechanism in us, we get glimpses of the "noisy flux" of a truer reality which, with further refinement and additional power (basically, one's innate and cultivated ability to transcend contextual - 'tonal' - laws or emanations), can be tuned to yield access to all the miracles and mythical treasures of yore.

3. It is very common, in mystical literature, for the author or master to be depicted as having flaws, or at least flaws different from those they actually had in life.  So Gurdjieff arranged to be depicted as a wasteful gormand or as a sort of con-man, although scrutiny would reveal that he was actually quite meticulous about everything, and arranged matters so as to shock, and thereby awaken, his disciples. Castaneda depicted himself as a block-head who kept dismissing the key points demonstrated to him by the sorcerers - this practice is similar to "shida-journaling" (revealing the traits of the false ego) or confessional writing.  Richard deMille revealed that much of what (and how) Castaneda depicted was in line with the Yaqui discipline of "clown-science." Another very well known example of such phenomena can be found in the Zen tradition, wherein the master deliberately confuses the reason-part of the disciple until it breaks down and the student is able to see without the linear filter with which we have all been conditioned.

Troimille - 3rd Millennium Research

RE Troimille

Yes, thanks Troimille... wisdom, and clarity are always welcomed and appreciated.

 Clearly taking inventories of sages is a shaky business for all the reasons you stated, especially with a being as sly as G. But secretly in the back of my mind I always wondered - as I believe Ouspensky did - why G refused to leave Russia until it was nearly too late. I suppose you could chalk it all up to a 'teaching' and I'll leave that an 'open possibility' but it still is a 'bug' in the back of my mind. And after reading 'The Materiel Question' and seeing how much suffering it caused him I just couldn't help but wonder.   I always thought that if I ever met him I wouldn't bother asking him about 'self observation'... but 'why didn't you leave??' :)   I know... it's pathetic.  But it's fun to ponder.

 To me, even if a teacher makes 'mistakes' though - consciously or otherwise - I don't necessarily see that as a 'negative' as it just leaves it up to me to 'take what I like and leave the rest' and to use my own discernment, which is - I suspect - one of the lessons they are attempting to convey with their 'questionable' behaviors - up to a 'point'.

 So to me the 'open question' as to their motivations and values on my part, is a 'learning' in itself if I use it correctly - even if I eventually turn out to be wrong.  You just can't lose IMO if you keep an open attitude in that regard.

 

PS - In hindsight if I had it to do over again I would have included the "(appear to)" statement in my previous comment - see edited sentence below... thanks for pointing out that inconsistency...

 

“The problem is with mis-labeling simultaneously occurring processes that (appear to) come to our attention in a linear fashion.”

 

 Thanks for taking the time to leave your comment - feedback like that is always a pleasure to ponder.

Paper on Brain, Proteins and Signal Conditioning

It has come to my attention that a paper was recently published on the subject of the brain, protein and signal processing. Imagine That!    See quotes from the link below...

 

 "The paper, published in the current issue of the scientific journal Neuron, shows that a certain type of protein -- the "vesicular glutamate transporter" (VGLUT) plays a crucial part in the strength regulation of synaptic connections. This regulation enables synapses to vary in strength."

 

"A neuron can be compared to a music enthusiast. He doesn´t hear the single sounds but the whole concert. Synapses are like single sounds. Some play louder, some play more quietly," he illustrates. But until now scientists did not know how they were regulated. However, a dysfunction of synapses can have a dramatic impact on signal processing in the brain and can lead to neurological diseases."

 "That the transporter has a regulating function as well was a big surprise."

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NZsYLHFtByMJ:www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110325152152.htm+brain+%22signal+processing%22&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com

 

Hello again Robert, and hello Troimille

Thanks for your response(s) - unexpected. “Time as a singular environment in which all streams are flowing”, Ok. Your response triggered this: Time-space-streams – overlays on a Cartesian-map? Pluralities? That singular mind I’m so fond of, it’s a plurality too. Mind-plurality points more to the truth of my experiences than does continuity of personality. Continuity is the easiest illusion to let go. Take that ego! Your response, and the comment posted by Troimille, are spooky; Troimille especially so! Six months ago, I made a blog to goof with. Don’t know where the idea came from. The word-play & concept patterns in your comments match that blog. That's what spooked me. A lot of that going on these days. Thanks again.

Timellessness Experiment

 Words and opinions about time or timelessness are futile unless they motivate us to be willing to experiment with the topic directly to have our own experience with it.  Then there will be no need of theoretical argument to bolster it as it would then become a 'known' instead of a belief.

 When the majority of us (myself included) look out at the world, most of the 'time' we primarily see space... and in this space we see movement as a secondary perception.  

 If you are willing, you can shift your primary perception from space - to time.   If instead of a singular undivided space you see a singular undivided time (IE -- see time as you ordinarily would see space)  then no more words are necessary and you just do what you do - in this singular time.

 Then it is clear through our own direct experience that we are labeling movement in our minds as time and no more explanations or theories or arguments are necessary - and we just do what we do because it becomes obvious that time is the Master Illusion - and that when we solve that illusion a million other questions are automaticly answered and without questions there are no more obstacles to just doing whatever it is we do in this world.  We just mind our own business... then if you must imagine something imagine a world where every individual just minds their own business and its not hard to see how solving the 'time' problem... solves all problems.

 It's important to note here that 'minding ones own business' in this context means minding ones own "Internal" business while going about ones life.   In a timeless state ones internal Self becomes more vivid and the inner attention gravitates to it instead of primarily to the thoughts in the head and the awareness of this internal Self is like a Self regulating knowing that influences all outer doings.   That is why the Ancients were known at times to refer to the brain as 'the trouble maker'.  Left to it's own devices - too much attention - and it creates problems out of  'life situations'.   So in a theoretical perfect world there would be no 'problems' so to speak as everyone would have already solved the one Big problem through Self awareness and all outer so called 'problems' would then be demoted to 'circumstances' that require our attention - that is in a perfect world!!