What the Fuck Is This?

jurvetson.jpg

 

How did it all get here? And who are we? How did we get here too? What is going on? Why a universe at all? Why stuff? Why stations of consciousness? Why a pebble, an igloo, a croquet ball? Why anything? Why space? Why shape? Why gravity? Why ground? Why heat? Why worlds? Why time? Why matter? Why? Why? Why?How did all this trash and treasure get dropped on everyone's doorstep? How does anything emanate from anything else? How and why did it become this?

And, while I'm at it -- why not something else? Something else entirely? Anything else entirely? Why not nothing? Why not nothing forever? Why creatures? Why private views? Why ego identities? Why now? Why should anything wake into radiance? Anteaters, shrews, snakes, wasps, and all the rest -- to what purpose?

Everything in this world has a context, in fact many contexts. We deal only in contexts. There are big contexts: hunger, pleasure, survival, sex, shelter, profit, America, Christ died for my sins, romantic love. These drive not only behavior but meaning. Then there are small contexts: putting together a chair from parts, following a soap on TV, playing a chess match, supporting a candidate, an uncle's birthday bash, yoga class, stylish clothing, downtown, the sales and marketing team, the gun collection, plans for a holiday, being a hottie, tickets to a play, losing weight, the World Series, O. J. Simpson, Donald Trump, Kim Kardashian. Money is context, war is context, bribery is context, police are context, the Bloods and Crips are context, jihad is context, mathematics is context, public transportation is context, trying to find a soulmate is context. There are mega-contexts too: mortality, the dead, the universe.

But there is no context for the whole, for the entirety, the state of existence (at least in contemporary American culture). There is no context for us. The closest to a context is God, or matter and energy, or DNA, but that is all outsider buzz. "Being" comes down to what "being" feels like.

Since the human species manifested in the Stone Age, each of its members has been confronted with the same astonishing blaze. Reality in its naked presentation, shining and bristling from within and across proximal space while penetrating absolute space, is flat-out shocking and profound. Realer than a motherfucker! It is more profound than all the profundities conjured by science and philosophy. Along its most deepening seam it is subtler than anything in it. Cars traveling down the street on some planet, probably but not necessarily this one, not even cars, are not profound when viewed by everyday mind; however, in the vast unacknowledged scheme the fact that they exist at all and are piloted in orderly fashion is profound and weird beyond conception.

Scientists now explain the existence of nature (and mind) by equations of heat, entropy, surface tension, binary coding, and differential survival. They scan substance to where its gauze is most distended (the sky), most discrete (the subatomic nucleus), and most quantifiable (the algorithm), as they try to excavate condition and origin. Fat chance!

Philosophers buy this prognosis hook, line, and then some; they extract "being," meaning, and values from it.

Psychologists overlay ego, psyche, personality, and behavior-thermo- dynamic and chemical vectors traveling inside membranes. They replace the philosophical mind with the biological mind and neurotransmission.

Shamans, priests, and clerics set nature under sacred sovereignty. Psychics tune to energies and planes not measurable or acknowledged by science. None of these gets to the bottom of the weirddom.

Among depictions and rationalizations of reality, twenty-first-century upper-tier denizens are most familiar with the West's sanctioned brand: the survival-of-the-fittest, you-only-go-around-once market economy. Their lives occur on its mean streets amid its hemorrhaging urbanization, in progressively more acute cycles of crisis and cataclysm, clinical anxiety and depression, plus urgency in the context of ever dwindling time and possibility, incessant craving for more, endlessly more: more life, more goods, more thrills, more validation, more anything.

In towers and operating rooms of the corporations and academies, professional scientists continue to address reality as a riddle in forensics, a cold trail left in the galactic sky and in the cyclotron of matter, evidence quasi to a crime. Dismissing its phenomenal aspects, they stalk it to the Big Bang and subsequent fusion, fission, and differentiation in stellar cauldrons ignited by the blowout. Comparing indices and refining their assays, they dowse and test the "splatter" in hopes of exposing the weapon used, the nature of an unwarranted slash on the void.

But there is no such smoking gun. The stuff that broke through from beyond time and space is out of play, forever. This is a spill zone not a construction site -- everything in it has been used before and as something else. Or not: same difference.

The universe is simply too deep, too old, too frayed, too insouciant to be explained. That is why grand unified theories of All That Is are, to a one, pretexts and vanities. Inquiry is limited to what came after the Big Bang, which is all that we can get at. Just about every item, every primo seed is missing from dossier and file.

Science supposes that creation was merely statutory -- no design behind it, no rationale or impulse, no hint of an absentee landlord, only the absence of sufficient obstacles to prevent or impede its splay.

Imagine a malefaction without a motive, that begins with its commission -- absolutely -- no assets or adjuncts of any kind.

Materiality is the present idol of our manifestation; it guards Entry and Egress; it decrees: "Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods Before Me." And we don't.

Creek and Ainu philosophers, Australian Aboriginal elders, Tibetan shamans, and the Aegean cosmologists understood (and still understand) the engine better than do most citizens of modernity -- and that includes sophisticated particle physicists. They understood it in the moment and bowed to its omneity: a light arising from darkness, a wind from stillness.

Once upon a time, the universe was sacred and unfathomable by simple emanation. Humans accepted the operations of nature as the mirror and counterpart to their own existence, surrendering to its primacy and innate dignity. They ceded a vast and absolute design and conducted a ceremony whose goal was adoration not interrogation. Before quarks and Big Bangs, they called it Spider Woman and Corn Mother and zoned its tiers by Chameleons, Swimming Turtles, Bouncing-Stick-Player-Toads, and Hyenas' Eggs. These are neither contrivances nor mere fables; they are not raw primitivisms either. They are hard-won intuitions of something before form:

"Verily at the first Chaos came to be, but next wide-bosomed Earth, a disk surrounded by the river Oceanus and floating upon a waste of waters, the ever-sure foundation of all the deathless ones who hold the peaks of snowy Olympus and dim Tartarus in the depth of the wide-pathed Earth, and Eros, fairest among the deathless gods, who unnerves the limbs and overcomes the mind...."

Eros before matter, always. Listen carefully and you will hear the rustle and trickle of an actual universe, an inviolable presence, not a working factory.

"The Ground Squirrel said, ‘I think day and night ought to be divided like the rings on the Coon's tail.'"

Contrast and discrimination-on fur as among the rings of Saturn.

"A very long time ago there was nothing but water. In the east Hurúing Wuhti, the deity of all hard substances, lived in the ocean. Her house was a kiva.... To the ladder leading into the kiva were usually tied a skin of a gray fox and one of a yellow fox. Another Hurúing Wuhti lived in the ocean in the west in a similar kiva, but to her ladder was attached a turtle- shell rattle."   

How was this possible before there were either foxes or turtles? It is because these stories encapsulate construction of a universe of events inside a prior universe of meanings.

"The Sun also existed at that time. Shortly before rising in the east the Sun would dress up in the skin of the gray fox, whereupon it would begin to dawn...."   

This is it! It might slip by as a pretty-boy metonymy if you overlooked its ontological cred: Everything arose from nothing. Concretely and explicitly. This is what it looks like if you peer inside this very minute: gray foxes and self-emanating light.

Viewing electrons, atoms, and chromosomes in the scientific manner as they shape-shift and deliver payloads doesn't alter or encroach upon their identity. For being exposed like a burlesque dancer, a mitochondrion is no less or more immaculate a riddle than it was inside Stone Age hunters. Western reality has no prerogative or supremacy over other brands. It may be the present operating system for modernity on Earth, but its roots are no more rooted, its arising no more fundamental or absolute. No one species's or planet's deposition has primogeniture or is endorsed by the universe. The same claims are made implicitly by the spider and the mouse.   

Through the entitlement of its birth, each entity places its lien on existence. Albert Einstein and a 1930s sea squirt each expressed a sincere and desperate truth, equally confronted the fact of their being and rendered a coherent paradigm of it. They fed the universe's eyes, ears, and brain.

There is Bushman reality, Navaho reality, Aranda reality, Cherokee reality, Xhosa reality. Within each of these sprout countless personal realities. And these barely scratch the surface. Cat reality, snake reality, whale reality, wolf reality, worm reality, bacterial reality all are "real" too.   

The osprey with its wingspan and talons, the owl with its judicious eyes and motion-detecting granules, geese with their star- and sun-maps, were knighted long ago by vanished gods. Currents of air, below and above feathers, fins resisting waves through rippling flow-these are sciences too. "Even the trodden worm...," declared philosopher William James, "contrasts his own suffering self with the whole remaining universe, though he have no clear conception either of himself or of what the universe may be."
Amen, and God have mercy on us all.

Science as we know it is not science anyway, not by standards of worlds or biting Rigel, Antares, and the Dog Star or, if not there, then somewhere. The Big Science of the Milky Way provides an impartial jury for claims of truth by experimenting parties on separate worlds. The Meta-Science of the Universe alone knows everything (or anything) about any thing. Earth Science, endowed by private and corporate interests, offers only space-time audits from the perspective of deputies on one planet in one small capillary.

Alligator crocodile reality, dragonfly damselfly reality, realities on the billions of inhabited planets in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds -- there are more stars and skies, more heavens and earths than are dreamt of in our philosophies and operas.

Each entity gets born, lives, and dies on the universe's terms, and the universe is one serious mutha. We don't get to choose our own operating system or paradigm indefinitely. The universe owns all paradigms and systems -- and it is running a far bigger game than science.

So get off your high horse! Physics is not king of the universe. Earth is not the only game in town. Three dimensions are not the sole platform. Stranger realities arise continually on worlds in other solar systems, close to here and unimaginably far. We know their presences intuitively and unconsciously because, like hydrogen, consciousness is singular -- we know them as something else. We know them at all.

Reality is the state in which we participate with everything else in the universe, a living fire that keeps emerging. And again at this next moment, and so on ... in every creature in every crack and cranny, every tidepool and volcanic vent.

Yet scientific laws operate with impunity, as if official, as if someone other than us made them up and enforces them, as if they were cast in something more than the breccia of metaphor.

In its act of establishing a jural reality, science has detoured from honest inquiry into institutionalized ideology, using a bogus authority to enforce its sponsors' products. Our bodily existence and minds are now arbitraged in a futures market. Queued into motor pools, creatures are encouraged to trade in existence for algorithms, to refute their own beingness.

What used to be pure scientia -- neutral knowledge -- is a combo dictator, morality squad, and hanging judge. When doctors confer cures, they must do so under a regime of terror, unacknowledged and reduced to muzak, falsified documents, and profit-and-loss statements. The Fates still decide how, when, and why each creature is born and dies. Clotho spins the thread onto her spindle. Lachesis measures it by her rod. Atropos cuts it with her shears, Charon receives it with a coin in its mouth. By usurping this province, by making DNA the oracle, a Taliban-like authority commands and deludes us (and itself) into thinking it is rolling the dice and cutting the cloth. Meanwhile it recruits us for its jihad: consumers all.

Body-mind is not even the sole frequency of intelligence. Beyond the charm of a matter-on-matter universe, other entities coalesce in untold dimensions of hyperspace. However divergent from our embodiment and shibboleths here, they are sordidly and viscerally real wherever they are because they are rooted in primordial awareness of their own existences and the common substratum from which they are arising. From their perspective today's local blue sky is the ultimate surreal backdrop.

For that matter the Earth is a planet that even we should never have seen, one that we were-yes-forbidden to see.

So I come back to my original question: Why us? Why here? Why now?

Why this gaudy manifestation, each granule, bump, and surly or succulent intent of it? How could you ever take it -- your own existence, the warrant of "life"-for granted?

Just look around you at what has formed and stuffed itself into every gap. Witness pure existence arising, creating space and direction, lighting its own canopy, pouring through its own portal, filling the void with objects, shading its own light!

Empty yourself of preconceptions. ‘I don't know what I am. I don't know what this is.' Like the gentleman songsters of the Whiffenpoof, "We are poor little lambs who have lost their way./Baaa, baaa, baaa!"

Let this confession fill your mind, roll across your skin, dilate into your chest and sockets, sink down below your shoulder blades, open your diaphragm, reverberate in your belly and lungs, drop into your genitalia. Answer the unanswerable question by an affirmation at your core.

Sense how deep and thick and omnipresent and sensational the universe is. Feel its silent stream of semblance. Hear its gurgle at a frequency so immediate, scrupulous, explicit, and snug that it is nonexistent. Watch its liquidity flowing from and to everywhere-the ground of yourself filling with a fulgent gleam. How is this possible? How is such an impeccable state of being and knowing allowed?

The moment you let go of your habit addiction, you explode in all directions. An intimidating audit, but not half-bad. At least it is happening at all.

Staring at surf, I am struck by the interplay of gravity, mass, and cohesion under lunar pressure, as rocks carve waves into glyphs.

We are sustained by foam as wide and precisioned as gravity, written by styluses as fine and hieroglyphic as air. What is spelled in our own minds is what was once written dumbly in the sea, in the calls of seabirds, welling up through ganglionic stations into sequestrations of self.

Mind is in constant dialogue with the intelligence of its own formation.

An imperative had to begin somewhere. Each motif indicates a source; otherwise there would be nothing at all.

What Sigmund Freud posited vis à vis dreams -- that every entry and instance has an energetic prerequisite necessitating and providing it-is true as well of the waking dream, the simmering fog. Each item exists because it must. And there is no bottom or break to the ring of proxies engendering and sustaining it.

Where else would or could it come from?

Beavers gnaw down trees many times their size, pile up mud, dam rivers, store vegetation in cold houses under snow, patch holes in their dams. The semi-aquatic rodents permit muskrats to co-occupy their underwater huts and eat from their larder-why? From where does the symbol come to render and allow the gift?

Muskrats pay a "rent" of grasses and vines as they swim into and out of the communal refrigerator. Under what compact do the beavers monitor this transit?

What future and eternal meaning is synopsized in the screech, the caw, the yowl? Barking seals, baying hyenas, chittering moles, shrieking gulls -- these metabolic packets don't merely provide meanings prior to language. They are meaning. Wild turkeys crossing a field at sunrise are screeching raw existence, intentionality, wonderment, and individuality back to the universe.

North American squirrels, though color-blind, discern a dissimilarity between acorns from red and white oaks, consuming the white ones which, by sprouting before spring, quickly lose their food value, while burying the slower-sprouting red ones for sustenance during late winter.

How does such information, at its every level of designation, get through the cables into molecular space?

In years when there is a shortage of red acorns, those same squirrels munch just enough sludge out of the white acorns to disable their sprouting capacity, and then they bury them.

Australian lyrebirds imitate car alarms, doors opening and closing, men with chainsaws cutting trees. Urban crows drop nuts into traffic in order get them cracked; they select streets with red lights because movement periodically stops there, allowing them to fly down and retrieve the meats unscathed.

Various species of birds pick up twigs in their beaks, then poke with them at grubs in tree trunks, agitating them to move in their dream of succor, to come out and be consumed.
Standing in shallow water, other birds make their wings into shade to trick fish to come to the surface.

The symbol is always and ever being born.

From Dark Pool of Light published by North Atlantic Books, copyright © 2012 by Richard Grossinger. Reprinted by permission of publisher.

Teaser image by jurvetson, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

It is all one vast awakened thing

"Everything is ecstasy, inside. We just don’t know it because of our thinking-minds. But in our true blissful essence of mind is known that everything is alright forever and forever and forever. Close your eyes, let your hands and nerve-ends drop, stop breathing for 3 seconds, listen to the silence inside the illusion of the world, and you will remember the lesson you forgot, which was taught in immense milky way soft cloud innumerable worlds long ago and not even at all. It is all one vast awakened thing. I call it the golden eternity. It is perfect. We were never really born, we will never really die. It has nothing to do with the imaginary idea of a personal self, other selves, many selves everywhere: Self is only an idea, a mortal idea. That which passes into everything is one thing. It’s a dream already ended." ─Jack Kerouac

"... squirrels, though

"... squirrels, though color-blind, discern a dissimilarity between acorns from red and white oaks, consuming the white ones ... while burying the slower-sprouting red ones ..."

Sounds like you're suggesting acorns from red oak species are - red or reddish in color. Is that what you meant? And, that acorns from the white oak group - are white? And thus, color perception would be a prerequisite, one would "logically" think, for a squirrel to tell them apart??

 

And so (just trying to understand), bottom line - you find a mystery or wonder of sorts in a squirrel - assuming they do have poor color vision (common enough in animal kingdom) - being able to tell one species of acorn from the other?  Just trying to follow your line of thought.

 

But even so, cold-hearted orb that rules the night, removes the color from our sight - red is gray, yellow white. If there were such difference in acorn color - wouldn't it be plainly visible, even in 'gray scale?'  (like, to a color-blind squirrel?)  Already kind of confusing, can't see how color vision would be a factor - even if there were such a difference.

 

But, perplexity runs deeper.  With oaks, I always thought -- the 'red' and 'white' folk terminology refer to a difference in the wood and/or bark. Nothing to do with the acorns, express or implied.   Acorns differ between oak species, mainly by shape and/or size; I thought - which wouldn't involve color vision at all, to my mind.  

 

Once upon a time (to my limited knowledge and understanding) - and still to this day among many indigenous cultures - people in general had a direct, first-hand familiarity, on close personal acquaintance with all various plants, animals and such in their locale. Life depended on knowing, in detail, with accuracy, the similarities and differences - observable, empirical data. Even considered them extended family, humanity's distant relatives. Brother coyote, sister sequoia.

 

An average five year old, in native context, could tell species apart with easy precision, knowing them on sight, by name, by their distinguishing features. And could teach others how to do likewise. If they wanted to know. Big if (?).

 

Plants, animals, all these things around us - seem kind of amazing, their little ways, myriad quirks. In fact, way interesting as turns out (looking into 'em).  Even now they're there, all around us - yet, mostly ignored. Like strangers in our midst we've never met. Maybe wouldn't care to - unregarded in their own terms, for what they are, and how.

 

White oaks and red oaks ... do you know these plants?

what the fuck isn't this

What the fuck isn't this that we should fuck it up so badly...what the heck is this nut we are that we crack as it cracks our nuts where the hell does this chaos come from, that we should come from such chaos, that flying squirrels come out of the monkey's butt what the cosmic crucifixion of what ideal of what it is, that we bless the damn and damn the bless, that our bliss is our blasphemy of of everything that dares exist, what oak of our joke that we pretend to see the specimen forest for the philosophical trees, what myth that we meth the very fabric of reality, as the breeze blows so the underground talk grows that the universe is on our side, we can't hide the shape we are in, Oh lord the shape we is in, what the crap freed is this that we act as if we can cover nature in bottomless pits of scripture, and carve the night sky in stone, have we forgotten the bone buried in the dirt of her ancient womb, have we dug up so many academic graves that cannot explore the shamanic caves with anything but child like eyes, what the shadow is this that the blackest flame flags in the remotest star, have we come so far, have we come so far that we never learned how to feel the deepest words that were written to describe the hardest thought as it sinks deeper into the void of mother earth's sex, what sex sex sex is this that we missed the core story in the middle of all this wild guess, at just how much we really don't know, no matter how we dig matter, the spirit will always dress as a goddess in all her naked truth...what the fuck fuck fuck is this that we perceive that we must believe everything we are told no matter how cold our object of desire, that we conspire to strip the blind discourse of all its false intercourse of mindless mind fuck of media mire.

vision of revolution

I was having a vision of revolution I was typing the words in the bell I could hear the ringing in the jell insane words were blowing down the road mad winds were taring down the neon signs these were the ends times trying man's soul and the ragged drunk monks proffer their bowl flashing signals flying through the wild lights air in between the inane ravings of the prophet they read between the lions & tiger brights and the killer clowns roar at the dead moon and the coffee rain burns through the film they cried in the empty buildings of God they screamed in the asylums of education I was having a vision of television revelation I saw the hell they called heaven fall in the star the time had come the bums had thrown them out we came marching through the Disneyland ruins came flooding through the ghost holy heartbreak hotel came banging on pots and pans in the demolition dawn they were feeding the visions to the unwashed masses giving them the hopes of the hopeless shadow boxes weaving lies into the hurling vomiting skies of movie spies the racket just kept growing louder as the rocket crashed all the banks had been cashed all the slogans rationed but the greeters at the gates of paradise pointed at the idol and the idols removed the painted masks of the war whore blood guts and gore let the dark angel pour the cool aid no more were drinking the dirty waters down by the constellation floor and poets and crazy visionaries waved hands on the city corner.

A New Power is Rising

All this incoherent, postmodern, liberal filth is going to be washed away soon my friends. We are Weimar; a civilization in ruins, awaiting our new Master. Theocratic fascism is coming, Reality Sandwichers, as I have foreseen: A glorious new Dark Imperium led by black-robed priests and enforced by holy warriors. All your wretched hippie dreams will die in an orgy of violence; dark armies will march across a world in flames and raise new flags to our true Lord: Satanic Power. A new power is rising on this planet, and its name is the Empire!

from the rude dude

that hates to think on a "hippie dream", writhing in alcoholic frenzy.Ah, to many computer games melt your brains, and all that crappy supermarket sweet and low down junk cereal (not surreal) he eats.Now he is ready to commit mass spam bombs on the last "hippie" outpost.Post toasties to the rescue.Oh and yet another fake name.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water

I'm not sure I am ready to replace the knowledge of black holes and quarks with Spider Woman and Corn Mother.

I also politely disagree with the notion that "The universe is simply too deep, too old, too frayed, too insouciant to be explained."

 It is the nature of the human person is to ask these questions.

No One Inch TOE

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com Well, this is, in some ways, a refreshing alternative to Michio Kaku who frequently promotes the hope of a one inch equation TOE, or theory of everything. For example, in 2010 Michio wrote: "You might have heard me speak about the equation that eluded Einstein for the last 30 years of his life: the one-inch equation that will in a sense summarize everything we know about the physical laws governing the universe we live in. I believe that one day, perhaps the destiny of all intelligent life in the universe may hinge on this equation. Finding it is the goal of a lifetime. "It is The Theory of Everything, the equation that might summarize all physical laws into an equation, perhaps no more than an inch long. Scientists and layman alike have been trying to crack this problem for a generation. We think we’re very close, in fact, the leading (and only) candidate for it is String Theory." This promised of a one inch answer to everything summons to mind Hedwig and the Angry Inch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedwig_and_the_Angry_Inch_(musical) which has me wondering if the cosmos might be made in the image of a genitally mutilated, musically talented transexual going through an identity crisis while supported by turtles all the way down http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down. Presently I'm reading Dennis McKenna's fascinating Brotherhood of the Screaming Abyss where he comes to a similar, if somewhat more plainly worded conclusion: Every culture has its own creation myth, its own cosmology. And in some respects every cosmology is true, even if I might flatter myself in assuming mine is somehow truer because it is scientific. But it seems to me that no culture, including scientific culture, has cornered the market on definitive answers when it comes to the ultimate questions. Science may couch its models in the language of mathematics and observational astronomy, while other cultures use poetry and sacrificial propitiations to defend theirs. But in the end, no one knows, at least not yet. The current flux in the state of scientific cosmology attests to this, as we watch physicists and astronomers argue over string theory and multiverses and the cosmic inflation hypothesis. Many of the postulates of modern cosmology lie beyond, or at least at the outer fringes, of what can be verified through observation. As a result, aesthetics—as reflected by the “elegance” of the mathematical models—has become as important as observation in assessing the validity of a cosmological theory. There is the assumption, sometimes explicit and sometimes not, that the universe is rationally constructed, that it has an inherent quality of beauty, and that any mathematical model that does not exemplify an underlying, unifying simplicity is to be considered dubious if not invalid on such criteria alone. This is really nothing more than an article of faith; and it is one of the few instances where science is faith-based, at least in its insistence that the universe can be understood, that it “makes sense.” It is not entirely a faith-based position, in that we can invoke the history of science to support the proposition that, so far, science has been able to make sense, in a limited way, of much of what it has scrutinized. (The psychedelic experience may prove to be an exception.) Based on past experience, one may hope that science will eventually produce a valid cosmological model that encompasses all we currently know—at least until new knowledge requires that the model be discarded or radically revised. In the meantime, we are free to speculate, and to watch the cosmologists battle it out via their conferences and writings. Terence and I found our vicarious participation in that process to be great fun. Thinking about cosmology forces one to stretch his or her imagination around some pretty wild ideas.

Terence of torrents

Having seen Terence speak on several occasions, and one time I went to a party that he was at after one of his talks, and stood next to him for a few moments, as others were engaging him in conversation, I felt his elf like laughter waft across my brow.Many years later on the night before Terence died, I had a dream about him, and in the dream he was walking down into a like a crater in the earth, and he walked toward a doorway in the earthen womb like a mine shaft or perhaps it was some domicile in another age or dimension, and he entered.That is all I recall of the dream except that what happened seemed real is a way that because the person was so real (surreal) to me.The next day I found out Terence had passed.

I wonder about psychedelics and those that are part of some grand vision of shifting dreams around through the superconducting lens.That what I saw in my dream in some way was a view of 'the brotherhood of the screaming abyss'.

"The only way to escape from the abyss

is to look at it, measure it,

probe its depths,

and dive in."

( Cesare Pavese )

Male Enhancement Pills

Frustrated and anxious to get a better size and to boost your sexual performance, right? And you think that male enhancement pills will solve your problem, so think again, and again to make yourself realize that no pills can do miracle to your penis size. 


maleenhancementpillsnow.com