What is Economic Activism?
At the Portland reading for the 2012 anthology, one of the questions that was asked to myself, Daniel Pinchbeck, Kal Cobalt, and Paul Levy, was how people can curtail or otherwise control the actions of such companies as Monsanto. My own response to that question and a later one, which asked how we can show people who have different ideologies why it's important to adopt our causes, is that we need to focus on more than overt political activism or subversive activism driven toward sabotaging a company or the ideologies of other people. We need to adopt a plan of economic activism. Such a plan is needed now more than ever, with the current economic state of not only the U.S. but the world in general. In such an economy it is much more tempting to cut corners and not consider the ramifications or consequences of cutting those corners, but the reality of cutting corners economically is that those cut corners inevitably effect the environment, standards of living, and most importantly whether we humanely take care of each other or simply devolve into a fight for survival.
Economic activism focuses on the idea of using one's wealth to represent one's values. For the purposes of this article wealth is represented in two different ways. The first way is the financial resources, savings, stocks, bonds, etc. that a person has. The second way is the resources a person has such as food, trade skills, networking, and other related every day activities which are used to navigate the maze that is called life.
Economic Activism through Financial Resources
Economic Activism through financial resources occurs through charities and through socially responsible investing. Monetary donations to charity can fund many different projects and can be an effective way of representing your ideology. Certainly it can be abused, as is the case where rich people will donate to charities in part to avoid paying as much tax, but a charity does provide a person the opportunity to financially support causes that s/he believes in.
The other form of economic activism, which is becoming increasingly popular is socially responsible investments. Socially responsible investments involve investing in companies in order to leverage your influence as an investor and push for social changes which emphasize humanistic values, while also making money in the process. Landier and Nair explain this kind of investing in the following quote:
"As societies become affluent, they experience a migration of values. As constraints on persons' existence are relaxed as a result of economic growth, there appears to be a shift away from 'materialist' values, emphasizing economic and physical security, and toward 'postmaterialist' values, emphasizing self-expression, and quality of life concerns." (2009, p. 12)
Readers will undoubtedly gravitate on the word affluent, arguing that this kind of investing is only done by rich upper middle class people. However, this kind of investing can be done by any of us, provided we have money to invest and a desire to influence companies on relevant social issues, which are reflected in the portfolio choices we make. Socially responsible investing is a form of economic activism because it involves investing our money wisely as a way of making money, but also speaking to the values that we feel need to be expressed in the companies we invest in. And any company, even Monsanto, has to respond to investors, because it is investors that those companies ultimately rely upon in order to be a viable force on the market. Investors can leverage their influence when it comes to social issues, and if enough investors speak up, a company does need to change its policies.
All this said, we shouldn't just rely on socially responsible investments as a way of making companies change their policies. Socially responsible investments is just one tool among many that need to be used to change the policies of companies such as Monsanto. The value of public protests and other activities is just as important for making visible economic policies which are detrimental to the planet and to each other. To learn more about socially responsible investing, I recommend reading Investing for Change: Profit from Responsible Investment by Augustin Landier and Vinay B. Nair.
Economic Activism as a Collaborative Use of Resources
Economic activism can also involve a collaborative sharing of resources. Giving away old clothes and other items to charity is one example of economic activism. Instead of letting those resources go to waste, they are donated to charities where those items can then either be bought at a much lower price or given to people who need clothing or other items, but don't have the money or means to get those items. However, while charities are important and should be supported, there is much more we can do to be economic activists within our community.
Learning to share resources and barter services is absolutely essential to do in this economy, and it occurs when we start to network. Networking isn't just professionals suited up, drinking wine, and exchanging business cards. Networking really involves learning who has what skills and matching those people up with people who need their services. Likewise, good networking can involve bartering services or skills that each person has. By learning who has what skill and creating a relationship with that person, you create a community, which supports itself by actively reaching out and helping each other when help is needed.
Sharing resources is probably the highest form of economic activism. Creating a community garden not only teaches everyone how to garden, but also teaches people to share the resources and foster a relationship with the environment that is healthier, because each person working in that garden recognizes just how s/he is connected to the Earth as well as to each other. The collaboration involved makes the garden something which is sustained by each person involved in working on it.
Economic Activism and Magic
Magic can also play a role in economic activism. The magician who is a socially responsible investor can use the investments as a vector or path to work with the entities of a company s/he is investing in. Since the investments are "life energy" for the company, the entity of the company will be more receptive to magical workings, which can be used to communicate and influence it toward focusing its energy on policies that are more socially responsible and environmentally friendly. Use an evocation technique with your investment papers to call it up and converse with it.
Another approach to integrating magic into your economic activism can involve providing magical services to members of your community as one of your skills to barter with. I do this in a small community I belong to in Portland. By offering my magic as a skill to be traded, I can do some magical works that can help a member of my community, and benefit from the exchange of services or barter in doing so.
Conclusion
Economic activism starts with us. We can't wait for a federal bailout and we shouldn't wait. Nor should we rely on the myth of the rugged individual and assume we can get survive without anyone's help. If we want to manifest positive changes for everyone, as opposed to just for a few, all of us need to make an active effort to be activists in not only the political or environmental sense of the word, but also as economic activists. We need to learn to use our money to leverage our values onto corporations so that those corporations pursue policies that are more people and Earth friendly. Likewise, we need to actively network and collaborate with each other. Whether it's helping someone find a service that person needs or working together to create a garden or share some other resource, it is up to us to create the communities we want to live in. Learning to use and share our resources wisely can help create a community where we actively work to improve the lives of everyone, and learn to collaborate in a way that promotes humanistic values in our culture and on all levels of society.
For more information, see: Landier, Augustin, and Nair, Vinay B. (2009). Investing for Change: Profit from Responsible Investment. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Image by Darren Hester, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet- 3-17-09
- Taylor Ellwood's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
question
HR 875
Undecided
I'm not sure about the efficacy of public protests. I've just read a couple examples in Get Back In the Box where Douglas Rushkoff shows that the very employees who purportedly are responsible for such social crimes themselves feel quite helpless. I think protesting can cause more negative energy than positive...maybe it can be beneficial if done right.
Toque123...to your question I would suggest possibly logging on to glassdoor.com and just looking up how employees feel about their companies. Sometimes the "green" companies who strive to do nothing but decrease net carbon dioxide actually end up increasing it through entropy. If employees feel good about their freedom and value in the company, they will have the power to act responsibly on the issues that very likely are already on their conscience.
www.tri-freedom.com
Eco-nomic? Eco-logic? Eco-politic?
As for this position that protest is key... Well, public demonstrations do go on record, which is great for helping future historians understand the 'pulse' of the times, I'm not one to agree that public displays of dissent are effective beyond that however. Usually that which is being protested is only public knowledge because it's far off the 'drawing board' and the wheels are already in motion. Rendering the protest to more of a post-test. What seems to come of public demonstrations is a feeling of gratification within the protesters that we are 'doing something' instead of just 'being pissed' also known as 'activism'. The question is, does the end justify the means? Are public displays of dissent actually effecting the decisions of the decision makers? Or, Are public displays of dissent just a crumb tossed to a starving society by mostly apathetic authorities?
Here's a link to a biting satirical piece that attempts to confront these questions http://www.endgamethebook.org/Excerpts/6-Star-Wars.htm
Zizek claims resistance is surrender. Jensen claims resistance is necessary. One claims the stakes the other stakes the claim. I just keep chasing the muses.
Monsanto Can't Be Changed
Overall a good article with some interesting suggestions. I don't buy the argument that corporate policy can be shifted through responsible investing, however. To take the case in point - Monsanto - you'd first have to assume that enough stock is owned by people with a conscience, who can be persuaded to sell that stock even if they take a loss doing so. Problem as I see it is, most of Monsanto's stock (and I'm really just guessing here, so if I'm wrong please, don't hesitate) is likely owned by massive professional investment firms and other assorted financial institutions, ie Big Corporate Money, money controlled by people who aren't just ignorant but actively malevolent. Monsanto doesn't do what it does just to make a profit; it's a full-on minion of the Antichrist, the modern incarnation of one of the Four Horsemen and we all know which.
Can it be stopped? One way or another it will be, that's inevitable. But it won't be by shifting funds around.
Your other points - participating in local barter economies and networking to match skills with needs - are very valid and ultimately one of the main avenues by which we'll escape the Prison Planet. Note I don't say Resist, because Resistance really is Futile. In fact, it helps the very people you're trying to hurt. Riot in the streets, break windows, throw molotovs, chuck rocks at cops all you want ... it's what they want you to do, because it gives them all the excuse they need to deploy the riot cops (and upcoming for the summer, whole battalions of COIN-trained battle-hardened troops), declare a national emergency and thus martial law and that, my friends, is how you end up in a work camp and They get what they're really after (and it isn't money.)
Sorry for the rant and I hope I didn't step on any toes or frighten anyone. We really can win this thing, in fact we must and (depending on one's temporal perspective) already have. I won't waste your time going in to all the tactics at our disposal - some of which you listed - I'm sure the readers here know more or less what they are. The strategy, however, is a simple one: withdraw energy from the system, in any way you can, and redirect it towards things that matter. The PTB need us to win; the reverse is not the case.
The Revolution is Within
Invest yourself and your abilities!
Sepp Hasslberger
http://blog.hasslberger.com
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/