Support our Kickstarter

What's Too Weird for Wired? My Predictions for 2013

wiredfinal.jpg

 

Commissioned by Wired UK to write a 500-word article on my predictions for underground culture in 2013, I wrote a brief piece around the rising transformational tribes that Evolver and Reality Sandwich have been tracking over the last few years.  Stripping out most of the esoteric stuff (ie: kundalini awakenings, morphogenic fields, post-Mayan prophecies), I figured the piece would fit in well with a magazine that mainstreamed Burning Man (a-la a 1996 cover story) and tracked Occupy from its inception.  Upon reading the piece, my Wired UK editor told me, while he liked the article, “it's probably the most unusual one we have had.” 

The editor-in-chief eventually shot down the piece, explaining it was “out of their core range.”  In fairness, they gave me a fairly generous kill-fee, but I admittedly felt frustrated about the “core range” bit, since they had asked me to write about underground culture after all.  But the strobe-light that flickered through my mind in the following weeks was the editor’s claim that my submission was “the most unusual one” they have ever received.  This statement prodded me to question the media, as well as myself.

Of course, the article may just not have been right for them, or I might have simply been another writer not-so-psyched about having his submission rejected, but I still couldn't help wondeirng: Is Wired (or at least Wired UK) not in touch with what’s happening out there?  They do present much that is trailblazing, but are they limited to a narrow spectrum of possibily?  As much as they follow the rising tides of new hacker activists, teenage Internet tycoons, and advanced luxury gadgetry, are they simply unaware of massive grassroots trends, like the global transformational festival circuit, Transition Town-type movements, holistic centers, even 350.org tours that are sprouting up like multi-colored wildflowers across the cultural landscape?

Or perhaps, I’m just too out there. To be honest, this article is about as “normal” as I can get these days.  If I could really write what I’m experiencing, as a healer and a mystical initiate (ie: astral mediumship, entity extraction, multi-dimensional healing), most hipster, techie, fashionista, or art mag outlets would likely think I had lost my mental and spiritual marbles.  Perhaps I have fallen too far down the rabbit hole for mainstream acceptance, and will be forced into some type of media exile to the outer reaches of print and web journalism. [Note: I do thank HuffPo for posting some of my less esoteric columns.]

My sense is that there are a lot of people now taking part in this emerging planetary culture who are experiencing a similar confusion as me regarding where they stand – do supposedly pioneering media platforms ready to publish what they say?  Are they willing to take risks on what’s new, even if it challenges readers?  Or have the group of us eaten too many spiritual, countercultural lotuses and can’t find our way off Beserker Island?  Have these divides becometoo big, the gaps to wide to connect between? Or are can writers like me keep our integrity and act as bridges to more mainstream folks?

So, with that lengthy preface, here is the article (note the British wording and focus on the Eurozone).  I’d love to hear where you land regarding the "weird factor," and what your predictions might be for 2013, as well.


2013: Decolonisation Zones and the New Planetary Culture

Among the numerous countercultural movements that have rapidly emerged over the past couple of years, such as the Transition Movement, alternative currency networks, and the global festival scene, there looks to be one major trait that will bring them together in 2013: subversive communities are largely giving up on the idea of repairing (or protesting against) corrupted political and corporate systems, and turning instead to building new models of community, art, ritual and sustainability to tackle the looming challenges of peak oil, climate change and financial instability tidal-waving towards us.

The coming year will see a massive expansion of these “decolonisation zones.” Here, participants reprogram from the “death paradigm” of our techno-industrialized society -- which daily pollutes our land, skies, and waterways – and discover an unusual neotribal alchemy where hacker activists collaborate with urban homesteaders, steampunk artists with open-source programmers, renewable energy developers with holistic health workers to create a rare space where sharing and cooperation foster human interaction and generosity rather than the divisive models of competition, greed and fear so endemic to consumerist societies.

In the past, the Burning Man Festival in Nevada served as the Mecca for a growing “future-tribal” culture, where revelers engaged in communal, celebratory rites of passage alongside massive digital art projects and computer-driven beats. This year, you can dissolve the carbon footprint of traveling to the deserts of Nevada and visit the hundreds of regional consciousness festivals exploding in population.  Lightning in a Bottle (Los Angeles), Transformus (North Carolina), Bass Coast (Vancouver), and The Philadelphia Experiment might be higher priority than watching the Man go down in flames.

Just as “sustainable” and “organic” have become omnipresent words for the environmentally minded, “reskilling” and “local resilience” are leaping to the top of the list. Initiatives like 350.org, Energy Action Coalition, the International Rainharvest Alliance, and the Transition Network (now in over 400 cities worldwide), will attract those wanting to grow their own food, repair bikes, sew clothes, use renewable energy, and collect water in order to avoid reliance on untrustworthy stock-market-beholden giants like Wal-Mart, Target, Safeway, and Exxon.

While the Occupy Movement may continue to experience diminishing protest turnouts, the slow-money mobilisation -- which develops time banks (now in over 250 towns across the UK), local currencies, barters, swaps, crowdfunding, and gift circles -- will convert more and more citizens bogged down by debt and declining incomes due to a faltering global economy.

Alternative medicine facilities and holistic healing centers will continue their rapid expansion as more people seek help beyond the profit-driven insurance companies and hospitals of the medical industrial complex.  In a similar manner that LSD influenced the 60’s, the Amazonian shaman’s healing brew ayahuasca (and its active ingredient “DMT”, which is sometimes synthesized and smoked) will shape the countercultural landscape. As more and more people look toward this medicinal elixir to treat mental and physical illness (as well as seek visionary experiences), this “class a” illegal substance will continue to spread across the US, Canada, and Europe.

The techno-indigenous styles and digital fantastical realms of ayahuasca and DMT are forging a unique genre of art, music, and literature -- “The New Edge” as I have called it in Huffington Post essays -- covering a complex amalgam of mystical initiation (associated with plant medicine ceremonies, yoga, and meditation), new media activism, punk attitude, and eco-fashionista aesthetic. This year, expect visionary painter Alex Grey, psychedelic writer/icon Daniel Pinchbeck, Sacred Economics figurehead Charles Eisenstein, trip-hop DJ Random Rab, and “DMT” film director Mitch Schultz to become living legends in this flourishing underground scene. Where the corporate monoculture offers the youth soul-deflating fantasies of Coke Zero, Transformers 4, and Tommy Hilfiger jeans, these new artists are weaving new dimensions of hope and re-imagined community into our reality.

With 2013 promising another “winterless winter,” further tottering American and Eurozone economies, and the expansion of GMO “Frankenfoods” by swelling agribusinesses like Monsanto, an interconnected ecosystem of permaculture farms, healing centres, reskilling seminars, festivals, and alternative money systems will rise up to take a much-needed stand. Given the rapid rise of this movement, as well as global sea levels, we won’t need to wait long to measure their success.


Talat Jonathan Phillips is the author of “The Electric Jesus: The Healing Journey of a Contemporary Gnostic” and a Bioenergetic healer.  www.TalatHealing.com


Comments

Critique?

 

Jonathan,

Did not seem that far out at all. Just straight-up observation into general trends on the alternative scene. Anyone with even the slightest sense of alternative culture would certainly accept this very generalized article as "alternative main stream" ... no more no less.

I always thought Wired was a more technologically based read, but am not up on it that much. Cannot imagine what they were thinking. There is always "status quo pressure" on most commercial ventures as the bottom line is forever limited to projected market trends by a very limited and futile system of polls and statistics.

They are probably missing out on drawing a more varied readership, what to speak of advancing their own awareness into what is at present actually happening.

All the more need to create our own media to represent our own culture. People go where people know ... there is only so much nescience one can take until they begin seeking out more viable sources of true time representation.

The oldest trick in the propaganda game is to limit the exposure of information so that trends become determined by think tanks rather than self-created by pure intuition shared among the more awakened collective community itself.

Self-promotional and self-supporting .. lest one depends on the interpretive ideologies of another.

Free to be you and me

Pippalayana, I agree that I could have highilghed more of the technological tribes for Wired.  As for creating our own media, out of all the sites that I post on in the web, RS is still my favorite.  The community juts "gets in" in a way other places don't.  I don't have to dumb-down articles, or make them less esoteric, or too positive (New Agey sites).  I can just be me.

a few thoughts

Thanks for sharing this. A few thoughts came to mind after reading your article. You describe an underground culture that is rising above ground, which may be perceived as a threat to their 'core range.' The lifestyles and values you (we) advocate are subversive, suggesting that alternative communities have given up on changing the system from within and instead are gaining momentum to come together and forge new models to live in this world that's hell bent on self destruction. This is heady stuff, not the cool superficial underground trends and styles they may have expected. What you suggest is a major paradigm shift that would change everything, a move from competition based consumerism to cooperation and sharing.

Unfortunately, as Burning Man has now become almost mainstream and the Occupy movement is on hiatus, they are considered yesterday's underground news. I am frustrated by the short attention span contemporary culture promotes and thrives on. It doesn't allow for the ripening of new ideas and their implementation. My sense is that Wired Magazine or any mainstream media outlet is afraid to promote any radical thinking that would threaten their very existence. This dilemma is a microcosm of what's going on everywhere right now.

But does it sell ads?

It seems to me that your prediction for 2013 revolves around the (further) dissolution of the corporate paradigm. An outbreak of sanity is just around the corner. Bad news for the advertisers who pay to keep Wired on the shelves. Or did you think the subscribers kept that thing afloat? You bet it's out of what the advertisers decide their "core range" to be.

Well, a part of the art of

Well, a part of the art of "prediction" journalistic pieces for a new year, etc,  is to be a little bold; otherwise it's just like last year but kinda different.

Wired Abandoned

Many, many years ago I abandoned my Wired subscription because even then the magazine seemed to be going down the Wetiko path of media corporatization. I am finding better reading in alternative web-based media.

Don't drink the kool-aid!

There is nothing "weird" about your Wired article in my opinion. But I also feel that it is your piece rather that is not quite "in touch" with what's happening in this community/sub-culture of which you speak. Not to be harsh, but to be sincere and honest to what I felt as I read it, I feel like you glorify "new edge" and festival culture in a way that is deeply problematic. This "future-tribal" culture often perpetuates nasty colonial impulses by culturally appropriating fashion and even spirituality without being initiated, sincere, or having the appropriate ethical capacities and without having done proper work on the self. So many want to "look" like they walk the red-road without actually doing so, or without asking for permission, or without becoming allies/ developing relationships with elders or youth from those cultural communities which they fetishize. While this west-coasty- festival culture is alas my home and family, I see it quite differently these days. I have been attending such festivals for 8 years and I am only 25. Look at what's happened with Synthesis, the latest symbiosis re: issues with the locals and with tribes. Also, Bass Coast in Canada which you mentioned and which I have been to every year, is fun, artistic and beautiful, but hedonistic, and not (yet) doing much to deal with the fact that they are on unceded squamish territory. They host yoga and shamanistic workshops, yet do not do much yet to converse, or repair, things with the first nations communities in that area. Other festivals are better at this (LIB gives out a fantastic informative and funny pamphlet on cultural appropriation and the history of indigenous groups on the land they use for the festival, their pamphlet inforces people without being preachy or accusatory, something I have a hard time avoiding when I am angry). Other festivals when appropriate invite first nations leaders to lead opening and closing ceremonies, asking the land for permission for us to "celebrate" there, and giving thanks at the end. And while many sincerely take part in these prayers, most do not, and spend the weekend not "transforming" but drinking and drugging themselves into dark, escapist, oblivion. I see lots of demons and entities on festival dance floors. Celebration is sacred, but drug abuse/hedonism is rampant, and it is an issue in a culture that claims to be "conscious" and "evolved". These words irritate me these days as it is not what I see at these gatherings - they are empty misnomers. And I promise that I am not cynical, but believe very deeply in it's potential. And the most wonderful people I know are part of this community. You are right re: publications (even alternative media and stuff) are very afraid and resistant to the psycho-spiritual and mystical content. I think this is a great loss and that more of us need to "Come out of the closet" and discuss/learn about these capacities we ALL have in less secretive ways - evolver/RS is a great agent for this process. You are not "too out there" nor insane, and I think Wired knows this. Your book, the healing power of anger article, and many other things you have written ARE revolutionary and emancipatory and healing - because of their honesty. they are not esoteric and incomprehensible, yes mystical, but they are so personal and real. this is what is groundbreaking about what you and daniel and many other RS writers do. but to esteem holistic centers as outdoor bass music gatherings overlooks the facts that people with money go to holistic centers oft for escape, justification, or self-soothing rather than true transformation which we all know is a bumpy, glorious ride full of dirty, hard work, good luck, and magic often beyond our control. I think spending a lot of time in NYC rather than San Fran Portland or Vancouver makes this counter culture seem a lot more unique and appealing. But in the areas of the west-coast where this is trendy, popular, sold back to us, and very 'normal' . . . it is frustrating to see an obsession with certain substances, a reliance on use of what could be medicine but instead is abused as drugs, a focus on fashion, music fads, popularity - things that make me when im in a cynical mood feel/fear that we are just another "scene" rather than the "new world culture" that you think we are and the true community i hope we are.

And this is why I feel so

And this is why I feel so strongly that we as a community should steer far clear of anything even vaguely related to anything indigenous.  

 

There are many traditions(Buddhism, Islam, Western ceremonial magic, Wicca, Chaos magic, etc.) that, if you are willing to do the work, are more than willing to fully accept people.  Why go where we are so clearly not wanted?

Rabbouni Yeshua:

Matthew 13:13 John 3:12

Quoted

What a response. 

REJECTED BY WIRED

Do not take it personally. Never allow rejection to cause you to question yourself. Reminiscent of my ex-wife, always asking for my opinion, then promptly telling me why I'm wrong. She still asks, but I've learned to let her answer her own inquiry.

We Need Bridges!

Keep trying to bridge the gap! Indeed, do not take it personally. There is too much bureaucracy involved to hardly take it seriously. But please take this seriously: we need writers like you to continue to shoot out beams of truth and beauty. RS is waaayyyy ahead of the game... It could take the world 10 years to catch up.

I hope that one day there will be a breakthrough to the greater masses. And their faith will endow those with true knowledge a role as cultural leaders.  I already speak of this community as one that is fostering the next "legends" as you suggested.

Next Go

Thanks guys!  While working to have some detachment here, I also like to learn from external feedback.  Perhaps there's another angle that will surface for Wired here.  In the meantime, you've convinced me to post my first real healing piece on "The Huffington Post" - toned down, of course -- to see if we can get that out there.  I see a lot of articles in their religion section that talk about spirituality but few actually experiencing it in some form.

Wired

On the occasions that I've read Wired magazine, I felt as if I was reading one big ad...They format the magazine so that adverts look like articles and vice versa.

Also, they seem to be on Apple's payroll. They did a cover story on Apple's Foxcon which suggested that conditions there weren't so bad after all...

I don't think what you wrote is too "out there". It's just not corporate enough. Thanks for sharing your predictions. I enjoyed reading them and hope that alternatives to the corporate structure will happen sooner than later.

As someone whose deepest,

As someone whose deepest, most bizarre things are that I don't believe in anything and that the reason I use cannabis is because it feels like a strong feminine Goddess type energy envelopes me(in other words, pretty damned normal)let me tell you..

The article is pretty tame.

And now I'm going to riff and rant a bit.

For some reason your article reminded me of a very long(but very good) web comic called "The Guy I Almost Was"(http://www.electricsheepcomix.com/almostguy/) where the protagonist organizes his whole life around a group of people who were created out of the minds of a group of authors.

He was hoping to be welcomed into a community of hypersexed ultracool down to earth drug gurus who would help him to "fulfill his potential", or something like that.

When I look at the underground you describe from a converted mansion somewhere in New Jersey that I affectionately call the "Hunting Lodge for Rich Weirdos" I can't help but feel the same sort of attraction that the guy from the web comic had.  

I do love my friends with their straight edge ways, love of profesisonal wrestling, almost insane love of meat, and so forth, but I would like to have a group of people that I could use cannabis with, maybe get a garden with, go to awesome festivals with, etc.

I wonder how many people feel the same way.

 

 

 

 

Pro Wrestling & Gardening

It seems here the either/or rather than both/and shows it's claws again.  Wouldn't it be great to enjoy it all -- pro wrestling, gardening, cannabis, and awesome festivals.  Maybe you could have some imititation pro-wrestling camp at a festival -- that would be fun.  I wonder what kind of gentle bridge-building you might be able to do out in Jersey?

Occam's Razor

I think something very simple caused Wired UK magazine to reject your article.

It was the reference you made to "the corporate monoculture offers the youth soul-deflating fantasies of Coke Zero, Transformers 4, and Tommy Hilfiger jeans."

These three brands most likely represent important advertisers for wired UK.

That being said, your article was wonderful.

It's disconcerting that even

It's disconcerting that even public radio these days have ads.  I've heard Exxon and natural gas companies ("Frack Focus") on their a lot recently.  I wonder if they are making editorial decisions on that -- if not consciously, at least on a subtle level.

Target Audience and Information Acceptance

I agree with most of what you said, except for what stefaniesara expressed about your view of festival goers. Having gone to many different festivals across the US I must agree that many are full of hedonism and people with the wrong intentions, BUT is off to a good start for potential in transformation of human interactions and consciousness. Hopefully in time the right minded people and attitudes that you portrayed in your article will be the majority of people who attend these festivals. In the mean time, much work could be done on how people view and treat these sacred and timeless events of human gatherings. It is my opinion that what you have to say is very important and deserves a place to be heard in the mainstream media. By all means a media outlet such as wired would be great for the ideas you preach. However, I feel you missed the subtleness required in getting NEW readers interested and involved in this up and coming culture. Your article seemed more aimed at preaching to the choir than trying to entice new readers who are on the fence about these subject matters. The real aim, it appears, from your article is to get those who do not know what is really happening to try to view things from a different point of view. Though the information you state is accurate, you may have been too offensive in your approach for wired to handle. This is not to say that you should change the way you think or the way you spread your opinions about the current state of counter culture. Rather, be aware of what your true intentions are. If you are trying to reach out to a larger audience, which would have been achieved had wired accepted and printed your article, then maybe fine tuning HOW you express your opinions would help convince and provoke more people, including wired magazine itself, to listen to your opinions no matter how radical on the surface they appear. People are stubborn, but are always undergoing constant change in opinion and bombardment of information. I say keep up the good work, and perhaps on your next attempt to try and write the article in a way that someone who has never though about these concepts would be willing to consider it a possibility. Rather than a clearly defined and one sided argument. It also sounds like you need more leverage on the word limit as to include examples and counter examples of the issues you talk about.

feedback

If you want some real feedback about why Wired UK wouldn't print your article it's probably because nothing you mentioned is in fact underground. Alex Grey? Seriously? He was slightly underground in the 90s doing album art for TOOL, Beastie Boys, and Nirvana. Daniel Pinchbeck wrote a really interesting book 10 years ago, but ever since then has been writing hoaxie Mayan mumbo jumbo and doing keynote Burning Man speeches. What you refer to as the "New Edge" could more accurately be described as "The Mainstream of Psychedelic Hippy Burner Woo Woo."

 

Here's the deal. Guaranteed the editors at Wired are doing DMT, ayahuasca, and chomping mushrooms on the weekends. This isn't a new thing. When you have millions of bros who have done DMT from listening to Joe Rogan's podcast, when the top viewed movies last year on NETFLIX and Itunes were The Spirit Molecule and Enter the Void, you have to realize that there are lots of well-informed, intelligent, creative people that already know everything that you mentioned and most are probably rolling their eyes at it.

 

From occasionally browsing this site, I think there's something that a lot of people don't seem to understand. There are tons of people out there who do DMT and other psychedelics, respect them, and incorporate them into their views of reality while completely rejecting the concepts of soul, spirit, energy healings, quantum woo woo, etc. You have to realize that there are urban planners, architects, product designers, marketers, engineers, artists, scientists, musicians who are all as "enlightened" as you are but think that they way that you choose to represent your experiences with psychedelics are boring and played out and not productive for moving forward to deal with things like climate change and poverty and feeding the 9 billion people that will soon be on this planet.

 

There is not going to be a moment when everyone's pineal glands are simultaneously zapped with the energy from a hidden planet and flood the brain with endogenous DMT, ushering in the new Age of Aquarius. The future probably looks a lot like this: ordinary people using ordinary methods to do necessary things to keep our species alive - and THAT is extraordinary.

Well said, fractalcortex.

Well said, fractalcortex.

lucid and true

The trends listed do happen to exist and are indeed visionary. Mainstream media (Wired is owned by Conde Nast along with 18 consumer magazines all stacked neatly in a single NYC skyscraper) haven't learned how to deal with them yet. So they wouldn't publish such an article. But rest assured, they will find a way how to make it part of pop culture, like MTV, Burning Man, the list goes on. Thus it's important to make this (r)evolution deep and profound, impossible to wrap up and sell as yet another product for mass consumption. 

WIRED is not WIERD

I remember those issues of WIRED that were thick enough to be mistaken for a phone book. Back then they could throw 5 or 6 pages at artistic photography, and had lots of great articles all the time. Talat your article fully describes the collapsing bubbles of special interest and the coalescing of a new planetary culture. This new culture is not easily or even possible to package into consumables for purchase; the new culture is participatory. My special interest can not stand on it's own, but when I look at other peoples special interests and look for ways to combine and synthesize we get new ideas that will be more durable. RS and Evolver are unique in that we mix technology, spirituality, social justice, politics, economics and esoteric ideas into the same site and treat it all equally. Evolver removes barriers. However, many main-stream people still get through their day by inventing new divisions and categories, and that mind set is hard to change. One thing that could be done for the article is take various aspects like alternative medicine and compare it to where were where in 1993. Acupuncture and massage were "alternative", now insurance pays for it. who says in 2023 we wouldn't have insurance (or god forbid - single payer) that covers pranic energy balancing. Even so, I thought the article was good, and would have fit in WIRED, at least in the old days...

WIRED?

As a subscriber to WIRED, I must say that I agree with the other commenters here who discuss the magazine. WIRED's parent company is Conde Nast, which publishes such high end fare as Conde Nast Traveler, etc. In other words, it's run by the globalist elite that perpetuates the same materialistic mindset that wants to keep us all hooked on the latest gadgets, cool stuff, and debt, debt and more mountains of debt. I like some of the articles in Wired, but have noticed that anyone on their blogs that mentions the "G" word with a capital letter gets shot down in flames by the materialistic-scientistic-atheist mindset that runs the magazine. Mentioning the "other reality" in general, whether one actually mentions the "G" word, or just discusses meditation techniques in an off-hand fashion, probably is not going to be allowed at Wired. Not sure how that squares with all the Trekkies that subscribe to the mag, or Star Wars fans who discuss The Force, but....

some thoughts

Hello Jonathan, I debated whether or not to comment. I was almost turned away by the site registration form ... but I got through it and here I am. I have no ambitious need to offer my critique, I could just as well have turned away and forgotten about it ... but you asked and I felt like I had something to give ... I hope this reaches you in that spirit. For context, I perceive myself to be immersed deep in change ... in many ways far removed from the mainstream (that reads Wired!?).
  • Though I tend to agree with most of what you say, yet I find it very difficult to relate to your writing. I had to call upon discipline to make it through your article.
  • I only recently learned about RealitySandwhich ... and after, to use your words, peeling away the esoteric layers ... there was too little left of interest to me. The effort of filtering seems hardly worth the crumbs that make it through the filter.
  • I feel you use the word community too lightly. It is, to me, a precious word and I believe it deserves to stay some more time in the domain of unknown and mysterious.
  • I believe technology has great potetial and an important role to play in the future into which we are all heading together. I believe that you were given an opportunity to reflect on that ... and that you let is slip through your fingers.
  • I have found myself in the throws of passion wanting to call out to those who are ... lagging behind ... and yet I believe that to be a mistake. Often the gap is indeed to big and shouting across it doesn't make for good dialogue. The shouting itself makes your message (no matter its contents) extreme. Though you may not see it that way ... if your audience was indeed readers of Wired magazine ... then I have no doubt that in their eyes your writing was loud and aggressive ... and obviously turned down.
All Things Good

iamronen: http://iamronen.com

bhudeva: http://bhudeva.org

Way off base

I hate to shoot this kind of post down.. I mean I want to see a new way of being as much as the next person.. but it is just too far removed from reality to be anything other than fantasy. Here's why: The "seeds of potential" that we can see in the festival people and renegades of the various sub-cultures; this is nothing more than natural human potential, the same potential that invented and built the industries that provide all the electronics and gizmo's for the festivals etc. Humans are naturally productive. Unfortunately growing some vegetables and making hemp clothing is not going to give the new-planetary-culture an economic edge or the technology necessary to sustain the kind of existence they currently enjoy. I honestly don't think these people actually realize what it takes to produce the technology, the logistics, the man power. Who built the machines that build the machines in the factories? How will you smelt metals, create alloys?.. -- There's a reason why the hippie movement "crashed and burned". It's in that very phrase! Taking substances and burning themselves out, becoming useless and unproductive. The same thing can be seen in the festival folk. No one is going to take a new-planetary-culture seriously if everyone is still wasting themselves on substances. -- Logistics. What is this new culture going to trade? Where is it going to establish itself? And what makes you think the global elite will acknowledge your existence or allow corporations to trade with you? Look at history. What we have is the most successful gangsters running everything.. if you want to usurp people into a new system you are going to be attacked. People aren't aware of this fact because it hasn't happened yet, the "new culture" is no where near a threat to the establishment because everyone is mashed on substances and not organized. As soon as you unify you become a target. MI5, the CIA, they'll be breathing down your neck. What is your strategy to battle that, and other forces? == If we want to see a new culture emerge it has to sprout out of the current system, not in "decolonization zones". The elite have spent the last thousand years grabbing all the land and resources, there's no way you're going to get it back from them. The only way out is to emerge from the current system and usurp it from within; that requires planning, coordination, focus, productivity, and vision. That is simply not going to happen if everyone is tripping and chasing new age ideals.