Support our Kickstarter

Waiter, There's A Fly in My Trash: Why Dumpster Diving Will Save the Planet

15556_196279945740_196277240740_3588437_2126701_n-1.jpg

 

In Aimee Bender's novel, The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake, Rose Edelstein has a curious relationship with food. She can taste emotions. It's an overwhelming nuisance. Rose knows when her mother is feeling lost after a bite of her pie; when the local cookie baker is in a rush, Rose can taste it; a friend's turkey sandwich was made with so much love that Rose feels grateful and jealous with each bite. Rose finds cool respite in metallically sterile, machine-squeezed foods. Globbing up her meals with factory ketchup, Doritos and Pringles, the lifeless ersatz void cleanses her palate from the bitter taste of human souls.

That food carries an emotional flavor is not fiction to filmmaker Jeremy Seifert. Director of the multi-ward-winning documentary, Dive!, Seifert takes a look into the 96 billion pound pile of food being sent to landfills every year in America.

Seifert's relationship with food was not unusual. He bought it, ate it, and what he didn't finish or forgot in the back of the refrigerator was tossed out for garbage trucks to haul off to that mysterious place where discards disappear. He wasn't aloof about the world's problems, but like most of us, he just didn't really know how big of an issue an overripe banana was.

While friends were visiting Seifert several years ago, they returned to his home one evening with large bags full of food. They spread the contents out all over his kitchen floor, snatching up what looked to be—and was—perfectly edible, but something was abnormal about this trip to the market. They had been to a Trader Joe's in Los Angeles, but it was well after midnight and the store closed at ten. This food came from the store's dumpsters.

Seifert is bright. There is a soft humbleness to him—the kind you hope a politician would have without faking. A husband and father of three, generosity and sweetness oozes out of him, but with a patient, protective alertness you'd expect in a good father or big brother. He is not pretentious. He is not arrogant. He's the nice guy who looks like he'd ride a skateboard to work wearing a backpack full of home made treats for everyone in the office, just 'cause. This type of kindness towards others, I imagine, is what might have made that night staring at a kitchen floor full of trash a life-changing moment for Seifert—a realization that there was enough food there otherwise destined for a landfill to feed a lot of people, a lot of hungry people.

A film student at the time he learned about perfectly edible food being thrown away, Seifert embarked on a $200 budget film project for class. Could he feed his family out of a dumpster and make an entertaining movie about it? And more importantly, could he get answers as to why this food wasn't being routed to the many hungry people who need it?

Seifert says that an average of 854 million people around the world go hungry every year. Yet on any given day, any given dumpster is loaded up with perfectly edible food, even during a recession. There are certainly plenty of food banks and relief organizations that would pick it up and distribute it, but repeated attempts by organizations have been met with red tape and bureaucracies while tons and tons of food rot just out of reach.

Grocery stores typically pull products one or two days before expiration. This means there are gallons of milk and juice, eggs, meats and even packaged and canned items, still perfectly edible, being pulled off of shelves and tossed to the trash. Along with wilted lettuce, spotty peaches or better-looking-yesterday broccoli, a dumpster diver can find a week's worth of meals in one dive. In fact, during the filming of Dive!, Seifert had to purchase an extra freezer. He couldn't eat the food fast enough, and he could not bear to throw it…away.

The day before this interview, Los Angeles City Council voted in favor of making all official city departments come up with policies so that leftover food from programs and events can go to hungry people in the same fashion as recycling is now a common practice. There are more than one million hungry people in Los Angeles county. Seifert was at the press conference and says, "This is exactly the type of practice we need to see happening." It gives Seifert a visible lightness in discussing the morose topics of homelessness, world hunger, environmental degradation and corporate greed. "In ten years, zero waste will be common practice," he says, smiling. "It's just a matter of education. Wal-mart now has a policy in place that ensures all of their food waste is accounted for."

Wal-mart is indeed a leader on many fronts, but Whole Foods Market—considered to be the iconic leader of progressive grocery retail by initiatives including becoming the first certified organic grocery chain, the first chain to sell only cage-free eggs, and they were the first retail chain to ban plastic grocery bags—still does not have a corporate policy on food waste. Neither does Trader Joe's, the California chain and most targeted offender in Dive!. In the film, Seifert sends repeated letters to their headquarters, approaches store employees, and finally gets a meeting at their corporate office, but to date there's still no chain-wide food donation policy.

The questions are confounding. Seifert says it can feel paralyzing. Why won't stores donate their food? Isn't it a tax-deduction aside from being the ethical thing to do? Seifert explains that even though it might seem like an easy task, corporations would have to use resources, which equal bottom line profits, to coordinate food donations. In other words, the losses corporations take by throwing food in dumpsters is less than it would cost them in employee labor to ensure that edible food goes to starving bellies instead of stuffed landfills.

Manufacturers often credit retailers for spoils or losses, too. For example, if a store was encouraged by a sales rep to purchase extra product and didn't sell through it all before expiring, the manufacturer may reimburse the store for their losses. Or if a distributor didn't rotate their stock and sent short-coded product, they'll also reimburse the store and tell them to pitch the "spoils." Which brings up another question: Why aren't manufacturers more involved in keeping their food out of landfills? Big brands now have Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives, they support charitable causes, buy renewable energy credits, reduce packaging sizes; why not help get the food to people? "That would be ideal," says Seifert. He's referring to the concept that manufacturers create some sort of agreement with their retail partners stating that in order to sell their products, the retailer must guarantee that expired or near-expired items go to food banks instead of into dumpsters. If that kind of pressure seems unlikely, just imagine a Safeway without Cheerios or Lunchables, or a Whole Foods without Stonyfield Yogurt or organic lettuce. The power of corporate brands is drastically significant, especially in this country, and while grocery stores certainly can—and have—opted out of selling a brand or product, they know the risks they face in taking leaders off of their shelves.

Many retailers make much of their money off of costly slotting fees they charge big-named brands, and not from the register ring. It's why Coca Cola, Nestle and Proctor & Gamble have retail ubiquity—they're the best known because they dominate the aisles by paying for that real estate, not because they're the best tasting or best quality. In fact, the opposite is more likely the truth. They've conditioned customers by limiting or buying the competition (Nestle produces approximately 6,000 brands). Many of these well known brands are loaded with unhealthy ingredients, toxic chemicals and are packaged in excessive and non-recyclable materials. Plus, if the economy continues to stagnate, retailers may be even more indebted to their manufacturer partners and their big marketing budgets that allow them to offer volume deals, promotions, coupons and incentives, which drive customers to their stores. In the case of retailers like Trader Joe's who focus primarily on 3rd party manufacturing for their dominant in-house brands, the risk of losing a private label manufacturer can be financially devastating.

"You need to eat trash." It's Seifert's selling point, if he's selling anything. He assures me he's never once gotten sick from eating out of a dumpster. It's different than eating from a restaurant's dumpster, too. He clarifies the difference in pulling wrapped, packaged items out of trash bags that were just sitting on a store shelf for sale from the more familiar image of eating trash, one of a homeless person digging through a pile of day old donuts or greasy hamburgers that have been sitting under heat lamps for hours. Eating trash sounds a bit like humble-pie-pride-swallowing—washing down leftovers left over from our birth into industry and post WWII excessive behaviors that led us to our present day quandaries over where to send waste that landfills can't absorb, and what to feed our hungry children whose parents can't find work.

"A lot of dumpster divers have sent me hate mail," he says, "they feel like I'm ruining it for them, making it too risky." While the film largely centers on the practice of dumpster diving by detailing the three main rules: first to the dumpster gets first dibs, never take more than you need and leave it cleaner than you found it; it also discusses the risks: in many cases it is technically trespassing, employees can put locks on the dumpster if they know it's frequented, friends and family may react harshly about you eating out of a dumpster, etc. Seifert's hope though is that the urgent message in the film will help bring about a sea change. "If zero waste can be as widely accepted as recycling," he says, "we can feed so many hungry people, alleviate pressures we're putting on our environment and on our wallets." He's certainly striking a chord with environmentalists. Landfills are land-full. Fresh water resources are dwindling. It takes 2500 gallons of fresh water to raise one pound of beef (in comparison, potatoes take 2 gallons of water per pound), making it seem like quite a crime to send a steak out to pasture. Uneaten food waste can use even more fossil fuels than it took to get to the store to be transported to landfills.  According to EnviroLiteracy.com, one trillion petroleum based plastic bags are used worldwide every year, many of those for trash.

People and film festivals around the world are embracing Dive! The film has won nearly a dozen awards so far, and food giant, White Wave (maker of Silk soymilk), recently screened it for their employees. Seifert says more screenings and events are coming, too. They continue to enter festivals, and conduct showings. His efforts to get Trader Joe's to adopt a food donation policy make his eyes twinkle. His hopefulness in humanity is inspiring and unrelenting, leaving viewers with much to consider, and not a single moment to waste.

You can view the trailer here

follow jill on twitter: www.twitter.com/jillettinger

 

Comments

Great idea!

..and a fantastic article! Really amazing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urB2mhK6E3o Be the change you want to see.

yes!

so great, thank you for sharing, rev0luti0n!

 i totally agree about the amount of plastics and perfectly usable items being mindlessly tossed aside. 

if we can educate ourselves and our communities about how little we really need to throw "away" we'll be capable of transitioning to a zero waste culture in a very short period of time. it's actually one of the easiest hurdles we face, in my opinion. reassigning "trash" and throw-away mentality is relatively easy when you compare it to getting off crude oil, coal and our addiction to war.....

thanks again : ) 

--

jill

jill@jillettinger.com

Wow.

So many solutions to so many issues right in front of us. Well written article. Traveler, there are no roads.  Roads are made by walking.  Unknown.

Excellent article! We manage

Excellent article! We manage to feed a large communal household almost entirely on dumpster diving. We generally find plenty of still good bread and other baked goods, fruits, vegetables, cheese, yogurt, eggs, juice, tofu, and anything packaged and slightly expired.

It felt a bit embarassing and gross at first, but I'd highly recommend it as a strategy for stepping out of the economy a bit and helping to reduce the sickening amount of waste of perfectly edible food, often in ridiculous quantities. It's especially sad to see so much of the fruits and vegetables that get grown in California or Chile and then shipped around the world left to rot.

thanks!

glad you liked the article and thank you for taking the plunge into dumpsters and for feeding people! there's really no need for any of us to feel embarassed about liberating perfectly healthy and nutritious food from peril. generations will look back on our excess and our trash addiction as a pitiful and naive practice they're happy is  long gone. like arlo guthrie said: 

You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day,I said fifty people a day walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.

--

jill

jill@jillettinger.com

A few thoughts

I really like what one of my local grocery stores at first did only at Christmas time, and now does at all times of the year. They pull cans and food that is about to expire and put it in grocery bags that are stapled shut and sell them near the registers. A customer buys a full bag of food for all of $10 and leaves it at the store. The store then has whatever pantry they're donating the food to pick up the bags.  

 Its a win for all involved. The store is making money on food they otherwise wouldn't have sold and the profits make up for the "inconvenience" of bagging it. The pantries that receive the donations take care of the rest and make sure the food goes to the people who need it. 

On a side note, one of my best friends in junior high would go trash can diving during lunch because kids were throwing away perfectly good packaged goods. My friends family was upper middle class and there was no reason for her to have to scavenge. Her family was investigated by social services and once SS found her family wasn't neglecting her she underwent psychological testing. And in reality there was nothing wrong with her, she just hated seeing things go to waste. Now isn't that reaction just incredibly sad?

wow

if there's something psychologically wrong with wanting to prevent excessive waste then they might as well lock me up now and throw away the key (er, recycle it)...how ironic and sad that your friend was investigated like that.  but it seems rather typical of upper middle class "i beg your pardon" mentality.  i wonder how long it would have taken your friend to get a visit from SS had she lived in the projects. tho, there's probably not much edible stuff being thrown away there in the first place....; ( 

--

jill

jill@jillettinger.com

If we really want to reduce food waste...

...and other forms of waste, we ought to de-socialize waste management and disposal. As conditions currently stand, people generally have little financial incentive (beyond efficiency gains) to reduce their waste output, because they rarely have to pay based on the quantity and type of waste they're disposing. This can be especially true for big business, which often socializes the cost of waste disposal on the rest of us.

waste instructions

hey entangled roots,

i hear what you're saying. thank you. one idea that i find really surprising and i mention it briefly in the article is that manufacturers are not more involved in responsible waste management both with their retail partners and their customers.

manufacturers can and need to be insisting that retailers ensure edible food goes to the needy, but they can also give consumers more information about the product's "Waste" cycle. whole foods actually does a pretty decent job on their paper bags by giving ideas for how to reuse or recycle it. if this became the norm and all vendors, whether it's a barbie doll or a battery or a bag of doritos, used their packaging copy to educate about proper waste or fun ways to reuse items, my guess is we'd see a lot fewer cans at the curb every week. people just don't know. as hard as it is to accept ignorance is still pervasive, it's true.

people are busy and tired and i totally get it. if i worked 9-5, commuted across town and came home to family responsibilities every night, i might not really care what happens to the trash as long as it's not stinking up my kitchen. people perceive responsibility as taking up time, costing them more money or requiring more energy than many people have at the end of the day. it's why  brands can help their customers realize how affordable and affable responsible "wasting" can be with a minimal amount of instruction. imagine a frozen pizza box. you read the "directions" panel: open package, preheat oven, bake at 450 for 15 minutes, recycle outer box. it might just be as simple as that.

 

--

jill

jill@jillettinger.com

I really enjoyed the article

I really enjoyed the article and comments. I've been interested in keeping waste from going to landfill sites, especially electrical items, for some time. Encouraging people to re-use and recycle is important in this. When you recycle a mobile phone you can help save the millions of phones from going to landfill for example. But your article brings a whole different perspective. Thanks and well done!