Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
There Be Dragons: Daniel Pinchbeck Talks with Russell Brand
Russell Brand joined Daniel Pinchbeck, Graham Hancock and a galactivated group of RS retreat-goers at the Boulder Mountain Guest Ranch in Utah for a frank and funny conversation covering a wide range of topics including the nature of contemporary media, quantum physics, the difference between psychedelics and "horrible drugs that nullify you", what comes after time, and the idea that people have been "coded" by society not to anticipate change.
A few weeks later, Occupy Wall Street happened, and they met in New York to visit it, as Russell writes about here: http://www.russellbrand.tv/2011/10/occupy/
This video was directed by Mitch Schultz and edited by Bradley Smith. Special thanks to Graham Hancock for being a part of the conversation, to Michael Robinson for providing still images and to Brandie Hardman and Ron Johnson for hosting RS at the beautiful starhub/portal that is the BMGR.Follow Daniel Pinchbeck on Twitter: @DanielPinchbeck
Tweet










Comments
Loved it!
Tobacco
Really tired of seeing and
Japanese Mountain-Dwellers Smoke, Don't Get Cancer
There's a news story I watched where these Japanese people smoke a pack a day and live to over 100 years.
Their diet constists mainly of vegetables and a variety of mountain sweet potatoes.
So it seems if the dietary regimen is correct, smoke all you want.
I'll try and find the link.
Japanese Mountain-Dwellers Smoke, Don't Get Cancer
There's a news story I watched where these Japanese people smoke a pack a day and live to over 100 years.
Their diet constists mainly of vegetables and a variety of mountain sweet potatoes.
So it seems if the dietary regimen is correct, smoke all you want.
I'll try and find the link.
Brilliant Conversation!!!!!!!!!!!
The True Nature of a Spiritual Solution
Thank you Daniel, Russell, and Graham (and all the people who helped) for that really fun, consciousness-expanding session. I've always been a fan of Russell's wit, as well as an admirer of his uniquely principled angling off of the principle of anonymity that's a basic tenet of most effective recovery. I'm still not sure it should be done, but have never seen it done so well, and with such constructive possibillities. Perhaps honesty really is the best policy.
I'm another person who's life was literally saved by a spiritual solution, or to put it more accurately, my life ended, and then I got a new one. But it wasn't until after I'd been given it back a few times before – I'm a person who has had three "Near Death Experiences," and believe me, none of them was nearly as much fun as this video.
But they did, along with the power of "the spiritual" in my personal reconfiguration, inform me about how much of our collective crises have to do with being in this rather challenging human form, with all it's foibles, and mechanical (intellectual, egoic) limitations.
I am a spiritual being having a physical experience– of that I have no doubt, and so I know that the answer to our circumstances lay simply in our being. That is, holding Love in our hearts and intentions as best as we can.
Gandhi wasn't hopelessly idealistic, he was a prophet. We are in the process of a spiritual evolution, it's just that our damn human egos as usual want it to all happen during our lives. Well believe me, there is no death, so it will. It's just that 'faith isn't always a well-lit place,' so to speak. It's hard to see how far we've come, how much progress we're making now, but just look around, the genie has got out of the bottle.(...right mate?) Already there's a consciousness alive in this world that makes our mass recovery quite possible – thanks to the "higher power" of our collective compassionate consciousness (as measured "rationally" by the Princeton's Global Consciousness Project, a day at a time).
That's the problem with drugs opening one to "the spiritual" too – they can touch on it, but mostly engage our psychic (human form) connections, I believe, not the spiritual ones we develop through meditative practice, service, compassionate identification, and living with eternal principles, as best as we can. Oh, and...(ouch!) faith.
And when has there ever been a bona-fide sober and sane (...) Media Popstar/Moviestar like Russell who could even begin to articulate such a profoundly conscious message as he did in this session? That looks like change to me...
Gandhi would, I'm sure, be very happy with you guys "being the change you want to see in the world." I know that it certainly made me happy. Congratulations on a great, eye-opening, heart-activating Wow-Pow.
Cheers!
Robert KopeckyGraphic Designer @41 mins
Nice
What if..
Seva, Homa, Bang and the integration of cosmic consciousness
Nihilist Protests in London?
Nihilist
I think the comment you mentioned did come off bad,,, but the Nihilist sentiment belongs to the outsiders perspective. There seemed to be no meaning, no message, to the protest. Just a bunch of kids saying gimme that stuff!
From the inside, however, I'm sure the message was clear, "We can't afford this shit and the economy sucks and Enlgand is still a classist nation and I have no future... Fuck You."
But the deeper message you mentioned is that these people were fighting for for products that won't bring a higher quality of life. The same products that people on the other end of the spectrum are trying to get rid of. That is what revolution becomes when we're so stuck in a consumer culture.
And the marketing isn't accidental. I think a lot of companies target people who can and can't afford their products.
England is still a very classist place. If you ever talk to a real upper class English person, you'll most likely want to vomit.
I think Brand is somewhere in the middle culturally (lower class roots, new money) though he's filthy rich.
How to Heal a Sparrow, Literally
Just a Video or Two
Just Videos here, where I go rambling on and on in sparkly jewelry and somewhat sparkly hippie clothing, and others:
http://youtu.be/qhO_0Fd9saA
http://www.facebook.com/LoveIsMyBadgex2
Nothing short of everything will really do.
About a third of the way through and I'm loving it. I just want to talk to a few points real quick:
- Russel asks Daniel something to the effect of "what can we do to change this", and Daniel had a great response about utilizing the same tactics as those in power, education, etc... I'd like to add this insight from Aldous Huxley, which doesn't quite fall into the category of trite maxim just yet (and even if it does, it's bloody brilliant):
"Nothing short of everything is ever enough." (a variation of it is "Nothing short of everything will really do.")
I think this is the foundation/mindset we need to start from, and go from there.
- Speaking of Aldous Huxley, Daniel and Russel were discussing the fact that we essentially don't have any real blueprint for a system that really works. I'd like to point to Huxley's Island as a potentially phenomenal source for mining ideas, where "Nothing short of everything" was tackled and changed. From education to the very way jobs are performed (no one life-long "career", but the ability to move between work more freely - for instance, perform "muscle work" when desired), it's a top-down overhaul. The importance of a wildly new education structure is its emphasized backbone (with children even undergoing a "moksha medicine"/"reality-reveler" ritual under informed guidance when they reach a certain age), and ideas for how we can change ours can be gleaned from that book, teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti (such as Education and the Significance of Life), talks from Sir Ken Robinson (available on YouTube), and the book Brain Rules by John Medina (to name a few sources). For work, see William Morris' excellent essay "Useful Work vs. Useful Toil" (to name one place).
Here, a few quotes from Krishnamurti on the matter:
"We are not bringing about a vital change, uprooting the old ways of thought, freeing the mind from traditions and habits. ... We want to do patchwork reform, which only leads to problems of still further reform. We do not want to strip away all our false values and begin anew. But the building is crumbling, the walls are giving away, and fire is destroying it. We must leave the building and start on new ground, with different foundations, different values."
--------------------
"You are part of a society, and you are struggling to adjust yourself to it. But that society is the outcome of acquisitiveness. It is the outcome of envy, fear, greed, possessive pursuits, with occasion flashes of love. Surely, you have to create a new society. ... But, we do not think in terms of total transformation, we think only in terms of superficial change. And, if you look into it, you will find that superficial change is no change at all."
- To Russel's point about the emptiness of the London riots, I'd just like to leave one more relevant quote from Krishnamurti:
"Revolt is of two kinds: there is violent revolt, which is mere reaction, without understanding, against the existing order; and there is the deep psychological revolt of intelligence. There are many who revolt against the established orthodoxies only to fall into a new orthodoxies, further illusions and concealed self-indulgences. What generally happens is that we break away from one group or set of ideals and join another group, take up other ideals, thus creating a new pattern of thought against which we will again have to revolt. Reaction only breeds opposition, and reform needs further reform. ... Against this regimentation, many are revolting. But unfortunately their revolt is mere self-seeking reaction, which only further darkens our existence."
Now, back to watching!
"The word 'drugs' is very misleading"
I'd just like to supplement Graham's brilliant point about the trap of Orwellian-type language when it comes to 'drugs' with this wonderful talk from Alan Watts (it comes in 5 parts, I'll link to part 1):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLly67wqsuI
The first line, which is a great way to establish the issue:
"The first thing I think we must be clear about is that the word 'drugs' is very misleading."
"We are the stories we tell ourselves"
To Russel's point about defining a culture with the stories it tells itself, there's a book that touches on it exactly and elaborates on it thoroughly and brilliantly:
Madness at the Gates of the City: The Myth of American Innocence
http://www.amazon.com/Madness-Gates-City-American-Innocence/dp/1587901730
This book also touches on the point of how we've lost meaningful ritual and initiation, and how it's affected our society negatively. Speaking of "ritual," and something that woman hinted at, is the Zen Buddhist expression "When walking, walk. When eating, eat. Above all, don't wobble." It's meaning is that the importance, the ritual, is found in the action itself. You don't necessarily need any special sort of dress or to perform choreographed dance/drama, just to see the act as a ritual in and of itself. And, in that "ritual," find the 'yoga' (the 'yoke', or 'union') with the whole of continuum of nature itself. That's not at all to say that there shouldn't be ceremonial ritual, just that it shouldn't begin and end with the ceremony.
Back to the first point, Alan Watts has another great talk on the myths we tell ourselves representing, on a fundamental level, our image of the world:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNbmwiTIlE
A longer version can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INVjMaoA-yg
As always Russell Brand
A solution?
Russel Brand Walks the Talk
During recent times, dope