Transition Town
This article originally appeared in Conscious Choice.
Toward the end of his life, Thomas Jefferson realized the American Revolution had failed to provide institutional mechanisms to keep the creative spirit of insurrection alive in the populace. He wanted to institute a township system, giving more self-determination to local communities, or "elementary republics." For Jefferson, the goal of a democratic republic was to make everybody feel "that he is a participator in the government of affairs not merely at an election one day a year but every day; where there shall not be a man in the state who will not be a member of some one of its councils great or small, he will let the heart be torn out of his body sooner than his power wrested from him by a Caesar or a Bonaparte." He worried that the representational government devised by the federalists had deprived people of a public space where their freedom could be meaningfully exercised.
Unlikely as it seems, the Jeffersonian model may get its chance in the next few years, due to the converging forces of peak oil and climate change. Richard Heinberg, author of Powerdown: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon World, calls the project that confronts us "a species-wide effort toward self-limitation." Such a project requires global coordination and cooperation to reduce resource consumption and energy use, while industrialized countries "forego further conventional economic growth in favor of a costly transition to alternative energy sources." For Heinberg's "powerdown" approach to work, the U.S. would quickly decentralize food, energy and industrial production, and return a great amount of decision-making power to local communities.
While admitting these proposals seem unlikely in the current geopolitical climate, Heinberg believes they are not impossible: "In order to save ourselves, we do not need to evolve new organs; we just need to change our culture. And language-based culture can change very swiftly, as the industrial revolution has shown." In Culture Change: Civil Liberty, Peak Oil, and the End of Empire, Alexis Zeigler similarly argued, "The solution to changing the Western lifestyle is the simple impossible act of creating social networks that build social support outside of the mainstream in the context of a truly sustainable society."
We are facing a difficult transition that needs to occur at a rapid pace if we don't want to experience dire consequences. According to Robert Hirsch, author of a 2005 Department of Energy report on peak oil, the problem is "much worse than the worst that we could think of. . . . The risk to our economies and our civilization are enormous, and people don't want to hear that." We use oil to make our food and most of our consumer goods. David Korten notes, "Without oil, much of the capital infrastructure underlying modern life becomes an unusable asset, including the infrastructure of suburbia, the global trading system and the industrial food production, processing and distribution system."
The downsizing of American life is going to be a hard sell, but not necessarily an impossible one. Depending on how it is presented to us, we might see reconnecting to land and community as an improvement over our current alienated state. As Rob Hopkins writes in The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience, "It is one thing to campaign against climate change and quite another to paint a compelling and engaging vision of a post-carbon world in such a way as to enthuse others to embark on a journey towards it." Hopkins proposes that cities might be transmuted from "large, bland places with a few 'entertainment' venues, to diverse places with gardens, ponds, artworks, more opportunities for meeting and working with people and generally more to see and do," where people had "less reason to travel to be entertained."
The English "Transition Town" movement prepares local communities for the changes that are coming. It is a highly successful and well-developed grassroots initiative ongoing in over 60 towns and small cities across the UK. Transition Town groups share information, meet with local government officials and organize courses in basic skills that will be needed again as fuel supplies diminish. They have also experimented with issuing local currencies that help to keep wealth within a community.
It may seem a daunting and unenviable challenge to convince people to adopt such a program -- one that includes personal and community sacrifice, a downshift into reduced patterns of consumption and the surrendering of some forms of autonomy for the general good. On the other hand, previous generations of people just like you and I have mobilized for wars and performed enormous acts of service and self-sacrifice.
Hopkins, one of the creators of the program, writes, "Rebuilding local agriculture and food production, localizing energy production, rethinking healthcare, rediscovering local building materials in the context of zero energy building, rethinking how we manage waste, all build resilience and offer the potential of an extraordinary renaissance -- economic, cultural and spiritual." Almost any community can make use of the Transition Town model, which offers a holistic approach and practical tools for raising social awareness about the crises we face. Ironically, the virtual Internet provides the perfect mechanism for distributing tools and practices for rebuilding local communities around the world, instantly, so they are available as soon as anyone feels inspired to make use of them. Thomas Jefferson would be proud.
Image by Outsanity Photos, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet- 10-10-08
- Daniel Pinchbeck's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Speak Spoil
I live in one of those English Transition Towns, and most people I know haven't heard of it, and so far the efficacy of the movement seems invisible, when you think of everything it must achieve. But I hope it will flourish in future.
Thing is, I don't think that peak oil and climate change are the chief reasons for which we should be implementing these changes. No, I think that the energy and climate crises are almost scapegoats. The motivation for sustainability, for the resurgence of local community, should be because they make for a beautiful world. The world we have built of oil is ugly, noisy and destructive, destroying lives and ecologies both. Violence, war, poverty, homelessness and poor health are also inextricably linked with our resource crises, financial crises and ecological crises, all of which make for an ugly world. We shouldn't have to sacrifice anything to initiate this 'transition'. We should want to run to it with open arms. It's not that climate change and peak oil are forcing us to sacrifice a wonderful existence; in fact, it's almost as though they are giving us an excuse to run away from the horrors of our world. Surely only fear could have been previously holding us back.
excellent point!
Good one! Thanks.
If you want to write a longer piece expounding on this idea, it could work as a feature for us.
They do make this point in the Transition Town Handbook.
As to the TT movement being almost invisible, I think what happens is that if alternatives exist, they can become suddenly seized upon by a much larger group, when necessary. I would love to hear examples and counter-examples of how this type of process unfolds during social upheavals.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Crisis = opportunity
I agree on this point – it seems that if there is an underlying, developed model for alternative living ready-to-go in the meantime, it need not be readily accepted or recognized by the mainstream yet.
As Naomi Klein points out in The Shock Doctrine, it is when a crisis hits that radical changes can be pushed through into society. By the very fact that the Friedman economists always had their plans for a corporatist state ready and waiting, it was blindly accepted by crisis-stricken nations eagerly grasping for any viable solution.
What is becoming obvious to me is that the nefarious powers-that-be most certainly have an idea in mind for a new model of society should our current situation collapse: martial law and full-blown authoritarianism, with all the trappings. A community with a well-developed alternative social arrangement drawn up will be more resilient to the chaos of a collapsed state and could very well remain insulated from the influence of a totalitarian takeover, which ultimately depends on a community's helplessness.
Collapse
Ah yes - following Buckminster Fuller's adage, something like "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. Make a new model that makes the old one obsolete."
But you say it is becoming obvious to you that the PTB will resort to authoritarianism after collapse? Presumably because of changes to the law in the US with reference to human rights? For me it was just a nagging fear. But also, I imagined a real collapse entailing also a collapse of the government's power. Certainly they would find it difficult to maintain control if all technology (as a result of having no fuel) including the internet and all transport networks were unusable. I remember hearing that the Mongol Empire collapsed because its army had to retreat to celebrate the emperor's birthday at the capital. As it stands, we don't have armed guards sworn to the perpetuation of the government stationed in every town and settlement, but maybe such a situation would be implemented in readiness of a collapse. Frightening thought.
collapse of centralized authority?
Hi ST,
I would second the good points made by Kiva. Considering the US federal government may go bankrupt, the efforts to impose martial law might not prove very effective. You might have a few major cities under some type of control for a while, but martial law is very expensive to maintain. Where is the money going to come from?
What I see as forseeable in the near future is a temporary collapse into regionalisms (or perhaps bioregions), with the South, West, East Coast, and North-West becoming increasingly separate and autonomous. We may see some type of Fascist theocracy in the South (as Chris Hedges predicts in American Fascists) but it does not seem plausible that such a model would work in the East or North-West. Perhaps the East Coast and North West will form a new, single entity, or the North West might merge with Canada.
The greatest worry I foresee is the secret weapons that have been field-tested in Iraq recently which Bob Woodward alluded to cryptically in recent TV interviews. These may use scalar waves or electromagnetism, as well as ultra low and ultra high sound frequencies. These weapons may also include the HAARP Project which can influence the ionosphere and apparently cause psychic disruptions, beaming anxiety and moodswings over large areas. Nick Begich of The Lay Institute is a reliable source for looking into mind-control technologies that may already be developed by the military. Check out his website here. The ruling regime may feel that these technologies make them almost invulnerable from public rebellion.
However, as has been proved in the past, a government is ultimately a collective agreement - as soon as the people withdraw their agreement, the government will fall. Therefore the potential to defeat the dominator culture through nonviolence is very strong - simply through the dissemination of information, leading to a nonviolent counter-power, which as Jonathan Schell notes, has become the most important opposinb force to Empire.
Obviously we don't know what is going to happen and everything seems up for grabs - however the US has been playing checkers (using simplistic brute force tactics in Iraq and elsewhere) while China and Russia have been playing chess to secure crucial energy reserves and make strategic alliances. A huge x-factor is China, who posssess what ? - $5 trillion of US debt ? - what are they going to do? They could force us toward military dictatorship, if they so choose.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Essaying
Oh, you did quote the Handbook in the article. Yes, I should probably read the noble Handbook.
I have already more or less emptied the contents of my brain into these here essays. Come to think of it, I don't think the phrases "climate change" or "peak oil" appear in them at all, so if you think I have something novel to say, then of course I'd love to write a feature piece about those particular ideas.
The Joy of Good Soil
Spot on, Kivie -
There is great satisfaction in turning poor soil into rich soil, and ugliness into beauty.
Your motivation is great.
The Joy of Good Soil
Spot on, Kivie -
There is great satisfaction in turning poor soil into rich soil, and ugliness into beauty.
Your motivation is great.
Sustainable Solutions Actively working Now
Secret T, THANK YOU for
Secret T, THANK YOU for providing those links! This is just the sort of thing I would like to help organize in my community!!! It sure is a good blueprint to start with from what I'm seeing. Thanks again!
Black Light in the Attic Podcast w/Serpicody & Sancho
http://blacklightattic.podomatic.com
Thanks Daniel for writing this piece
Just want to add more links. We have created a Portal at our site that leads to many cool websites specifically about the Transition movement throughout the world. I just launched one in CA so please check it out.
http://www.hopedance.org/cms/content/view/535/1
Bob Banner
Publisher of HopeDance (www.hopedance.org): Radical Solutions Inspiring Hope
Interested in getting skills
I'm interested, too in meeting with other people on Central Coast to actually get hands on skills relating to growing food, raising chickens and such in a suburban environment. I'm very afraid of depending on supermarkets for sustenance in the coming decade. I am unemployed right now. I knit a lot.
By the way...I lived on a commune for 15 years but spent much of the time making hammocks because I enjoyed that kind of work so much. Alexis Zeigler (a Peak Oil writer) and I were actually in the same visitor group in 1985 at Twin Oaks and it's so exciting that he's now giving talks on transition movement.
best work ever
this is a great idea. we
this is a great idea. we need to start doing this in the states. is there any reason why it was only tried in small cities & towns in the UK? could we make it happen in los angeles or brooklyn?
also, to ST's point: "the nefarious powers-that-be most certainly have an idea in mind for a new model of society should our current situation collapse: martial law and full-blown authoritarianism, with all the trappings." i figure you are right. also, the collapse of the financial sector doesn't mean total economic collapse, or government or military collapse. and peak oil may not come soon enough to cripple the prison-military-industrial complex any time soon. but fears of fascism, resource scarcity or ecological collapse are not the real reasons to undertake this project (i actually feel that those fears put us in a sort of death trance, a morbid fascination, that then makes them seem more inevitable than they are). As the actual transition town resident said: "The motivation for sustainability, for the resurgence of local community, should be because they make for a beautiful world."
peace, D
www.myspace.com/thedeclineofthewest
TRANSITION COMES TO THE U.S.!
We're beginning the process of bringing the Transition Movement to this country. Our organization (Transition Boulder County, formerly Boulder County Going Local) has been working towards community relocalization for more than three years, but has recently become the first official Transition Initiative in North America. Other Initiatives have already been established in Sandpoint and Ketchum, Idaho; Lyons, CO; and Santa Cruz, CA. Another 100 or so are forming, along with another 800 in other countries who are in the early stages of development, joining more than 100 communities who are officially implementing the Transition process created by Rob Hopkins and friends.
From my perspective, Transition appears to be the fastest-growing, most inspirational, most significant social change movement we've ever seen.
Please join us at Transition Colorado (http://transitioncolorado.ning.com) and Transition U.S. (http://transitionus.ning.com), where social networking technology is being utilized in revolutionary ways to support this movement. Here you can connect and find out how to get involved. Jump in!
Also, visit Transition Boulder County (http://www.transitionbouldercounty.org) and explore some of what we have underway here.
Mainstream media is already beginning to put Transition on their radar. The Christian Science Monitor published a piece last month athttp://features.csmonitor.com/environment/2008/09/11/communities-plan-for-a-low-energy-future/.
Thanks to Daniel for shining the spotlight on this very exciting development!
Michael Brownlee, Catalyst
Transition Boulder County
Transition Colorado
Transition U.S.
Nice
The Transition Handbook
Good news from the People's Republic of Boulder! Wish I'd known when I was there in August.
Are you aware that The Transition Handbook is now open to contributions at Appropedia (the sustainability wiki)?
Rob Hopkins is hoping for contributions from Transitioners and likeminded people.
Maybe I'll get to visit you next year.
More and more everyday I
More and more everyday I realize that this sort of setup is just what is needed in this day and age! Just think of all the banal, verdant lawns of zoyshia we could convert into usable plant gardens. . .amazing.
I'm actually trying to get a small team put together her in my town that is suburban/rural(on the far outskirts of full-on suburbia, we still have lots of farmland and small town folk here!) and I want to use my property to have an urban permaculture type garden in my side and back yard, and through that project I hope to get the towns people involved in this idea of a transition town. . .and if the economic shit really hits the fan than it should be no large task to sell the idea of community gardens to the people around here!
One of the things I've taken from Bill Mollison, the founder of permaculture, is that there are no problems in life, only opportunities!!!
Black Light in the Attic Podcast w/Serpicody & Sancho
http://blacklightattic.podomatic.com
Other ideas.
Growing up in the Saddleback Valley of Orange County in the 1970's, I've seen a fertile paradise transformed into what is now known as The OC. An endless spread of suburbia. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwK1hCJwr3Q&feature=related
Now, look at what thirtysomething years has turned our planet into:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjbV9z50gPM
I hear many talk about "BUILDING" new communities that are to be higher density to alleviate the need for energy consumption to travel by car to get to and fro. While I agree that's a good long term strategy for any new construction, I'd argue that we've already built way more houses than we really need. We build more of everything than we really need, that's the problem.
When the baby boomers were taught to hoarde their savings, & build their wealth to secure their golden years. That's what they did. Instead of a homestead consisting of mulitple generations, we have Grandma living in a 2500 square foot home by herself. Grandpa that divorced Grandma & now lives alone as well in his 1700 sq.ft. house, living within 30 miles of their children, that live in a 4500 sq.ft house with their 2 kids. Don't forget about Grandpa's vacation home in Mexico, or Grandma's timeshare in Hawaii. Between them all, they've got 10,000 square feet of living space. How many homes does John Mccain own?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUiGXv-DiS4
I think we'd be much happier if we learned to live together. Even multiple families living in a single mega tract house. Have you guys been in many 4000+ square foot homes? There's an endless supply of them here. Two or more families, with kids could comfortably live in these big boxes.
I live in an neighborhood with about 1000 homes within the homeowners association. Between us all, we kick in about $1,200,000 in dues per year. Our budget documents show that we're spending over $900K per year to water our greenbelt, & slopes. Seriously, just to water a patch of grass that's about 1.5 miles long by about 200 feet wide, and rougly 200 acres of slopes planted mostly in acacia.
Wouldn't it make more sense to rip up the lawn & plant something there that we could eat? And sell the surplus?
In my region, these slopes would grow Oranges, lemons, avocados, grapefruit, grapes, the greenbelt would be suitable for anything you could imagine. Anything would grow well here. When I was a kid, much of the county was planted in Strawberries. There aren't many strawberry fields left.
Why not do this everywhere?
These are the types of small steps that can be sold to average Joe & Nancy Apathy, without them crying Hippie Tree Hugger!, if you can demonstrate that instead of shelling out $1.2 million per year for maintainance of ornamental fluff, the common spaces could be producing food. And food is what everybody needs.
There are a lot of things we need to be doing right now, and the better the models that todays pioneers can create to serve as examples to others when choices are going to be made the better.
Some of the greatest obstacles to overcome will be deeply ingrained stigmas about social groups. When people talk about working together & choosing to reject materialism for a more gracious life. The reaction for the majority of flag waving super patriots, is to proclaim Communist!. That's a touchy word, & it probably ranks up there in the top most taboo words for Westerners.
1. Nazi
2. Devil/satan
3. Jew
4. N word
5. Fag/Gay/etc.
6. Communist.
I'm pleased to acknowledge that over the past few decades we've laid a few of those toxic words to rest, mostly. But all these words carry with them massive weight. That's part of the design by the PTB to establish conditioned responses in US when we fear our safety is being threatened by one of these demons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DazcaEmE6wY
It may take a while before you even begin to figure out what I'm talking about.
Amish have the last laugh?
yep
sadly I don't think they will be laughing
Growing Pains
This is a great article. I've been having similar thoughts and it seems as if others have as well. My concern is with how this transition would occur. Jefferson's "Elementary Republic" would only be possible if the current model was found lacking. Recent events may be evidence of this growing lack of confidence in our way of life.
It is possible and even likely that the current financial crises could cause the collapse of our current societal framework. Our livelihoods have been married to this economy and I'm afraid the divorce may end up being a long and difficult affair. At what point do we institute this transition into a sustainable, self-governing society and dedicate ourselves to it? What are the circumstances that are required for its arrival; widespread conflict? I hope this is not the case but I worry that people will not accept the reformation of their entire belief system without some sort of catharsis. This is certainly a possibility, so how do we prevent conflict from occurring in the face of such challenges?
I think there needs to be more initiative, but I find there is little motivation within the larger dominant culture to take this initiative. In order for us to immediately institute an "Elementary Republic" individuals may need to sacrifice capital, income, status, and ego. It may require us to abandon our livelihoods and remove ourselves from this society altogether. That's a difficult decision to make. I'm not ready to abandon my place in society to become a farmer on a commune; no matter how mundane my job or meager art career may seem.
So, is it going to take a financial meltdown and potential conflict to reform society or is there opportunity for a smoother transition? Does the potential for this model remain only in small, isolated communities? I don't know; I pose these questions to you all.
Entheos Genesthai.
all career no art
most of us are broke anyway. we wouldn't be giving up much in terms of status & income... & our art would only flourish if we were able to separate it from the marketplace. actually, i feel like art is totally suffocated by the current economy. its become all career, no genius. also, these towns don't seem to be isolated communes, they are little nodes within existing cities. personally, i would rather plant vegetables while peddling my music career than wait tables while doing same.
my question is: where did the english transition towns get their funding from?
peace,
D
www.myspace.com/thedeclineofthewest
Yes, But . . .
I agree Devon but my original point remains. The fact is that we're still writing and talking about reformation while kicking around our day jobs and trying to peddle our art and music on the side. I would hop onto the bandwagon of an abundance-economy-based, sustainable, democratic community if it wasn't isolated from the rest of society. Yet, there is little or no interest at the level of our leadership in The United States to restructure our society and allow these communities to develop; nor is the majority of the population interested. Everyone seems complacent so long as they still have their routine.
It's certainly worthwhile to find out how these English towns began instituting such reforms. If we knew how they managed this, perhaps we could replicate their experiments here in The States. Yet, the problem remains: they're an ocean away from us and their system only works at a small scale. What about London. A lot of people live in London. Will this system work in London, New York or Chicago? The model would need to be adapted to fit the qualities of a metropolitan area. In order for that to happen you need widespread appeal amongst a variety of demographic groups.
I also don't think the restructured community needs to be a communist society. I would prefer to see a socialist society instituted through a restructuring of our economic system using tools like time dollars, barter money, real money, and local currency. I just don't think that a strict, communist economy offers the dynamism of a zero-point, free market economy that is properly regulated.
You wouldn't be willing to work on a farm at all?
Let's say that all that seperated US from living in total harmony with the world, peace & love reign supreme above all other motivations.
And You would not be willing to work on a farm in order to achieve such a utopian dream?
That's the problem.
When you'all're ready to do Anything necessary to smash the old corrupted system that is not serving it's citizens, rather it's citationin's serve the system.
Solemn faced
The village settles down
Undetected by the stars
And the hangman plays the mandolin before he goes to sleep
And the last thing on his mind
Is the Wild Eyed Boy imprisoned
'Neath the covered wooden shaft
Folds the rope
Into it's bag
Blows his pipe of smolders
Blankets smoke into the room
And the day will end for some
As the night begins for one
Staring through the message in his eyes
Lies a solitary son
From the mountain called Freecloud
Where the eagle dare not fly
And the patience in his sigh
Gives no indication
For the townsmen to decide
So the village Dreadful yawns
Pronouncing gross diversion
As the label for the dog
Oh "It's the madness in his eyes"
As he breaks the night to cry:
"It's really Me
Really You
And really Me
It's so hard for us to really be
Really You
And really Me
You'll lose me though I'm always
Really free"
And the mountain moved it's eyes
To the world of realize
Where the snow had saved a place
For the Wild Eyed Boy
From Freecloud
And the village Dreadful cried
As the rope began to rise
For the smile stayed on the face
Of the Wild Eyed Boy
From Freecloud
And the women once proud
Clutched the heart of the crowd
As the boulders smashed down from the mountain's hand
And the Magic in the stare
Of the Wild Eyed Boy said
"Stop, Freecloud
They won't think to cut me down"
But the cottages fell
Like a playing card hell
And the tears on the face
Of the Wise Boy
Came tumbling down
To the rumbling ground
And the missionary mystic of peace/love
Stumbled to cry among the clouds
Kicking back the pebbles
From the Freecloud mountain
Track.
Oop[s, I just copy & pasted the wrong link..
Let me do a do-over.
Here is what I'm listening to at the moment. Sounds nice..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p79JKclG-oc&feature=related
I hope I don't sound like I'm trying to argue, that's not what I'm here for.
Cheers,
everything else you said, I agree with very much.
thanks for being part of the solution.
http://te1aha2juawellallbea.multiply.com/video
It may take a while before you even begin to figure out what I'm talking about.
TheVenusProject.com
Caveat Emptor
The New World Order is logistically and practically unfeasible. People can barely tolerate each other; they won't be able to tolerate the demands of a global government. I didn't notice any tabs on the Venus Project website that mentioned "law" and "order." In fact, the whole site looked unrealistically utopian. I don't think a New World Order is a probable future for mankind nor do I think it is a favorable one.
The problem with The Venus Project is that it doesn't mention any sort of law. Frankly, that's disturbing. I will not live in a society where there is no law, where I have no basis to determine what my liberties are and are not. Have you ever read 1984? Oceania didn't have any laws. No, no thanks. I prefer a thousand thousand tribes over a one world government. Indigenous tribes work less, fight less, and are happier than people living in the civilized world.
I don't think we should dismantle everything we've built over the last 3000 years, but I certainly think we can learn a bit from nature, including human nature, and shift our society to a community-focused civilization based on a set of fair and democratic laws that emphasize local government. Ideally, the transition through an economic/political crisis into a newly structured society would be smooth and without conflict. In order for that to happen it would have to retain elements from the previous incarnations of society - those tools that have been found helpful to us in the past - like the internet, or democracy, or judge by jury. Those devices require laws; as would any new societal institution that could be employed.
Good Points
Law too is broken.
YOu contradict yourself in your argument I think.
YOu state that indigenous tribes work less (that's good isn't it?) Fight Less. (also good) & are HAPPIER!.
Are you suggesting that you'd go to the Amazon rain forest in the year 1000 AD, & find a system of law's & courts, & lawyers, and beaurocrats grinding down & exploiting his neighbors for profit?
I don't think law is the answer. It merely gives teeth to the sharks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mid1LPj4Y9M
It may take a while before you even begin to figure out what I'm talking about.
anarchy IS order
the venus project, whatever it is, sounds like a crock of shit. it has a stupid name, anyway...
as to 'law & order'... what good is it? the first laws put in writing were laws pertaining to property rights... written law comes into being at precisely the moment in history that class division comes into being, the moment a rich, royal, or priestly caste seeks to justify or stake out its holdings... people don't actually need laws that say 'don't kill', 'don't steal'... was moses really coming down the mountain with anything novel? it was the law itself - the fact that there was a law at all, that was the significant part. it certainly did not keep god's chosen people from killing, nor did it prevent subsequent laws from prescribing killing as punishment. what it did was create a dominator-dominated relationship between man & god, man & man, man & woman, man & nature, which has proved thoroughly unhealthy in the long run. so perhaps we are better off without 'law & order.' anarchism is not an impossible dream. in fact, what has been proven impossible is the idea that law & order will produce anything other than the dominator relationships we currently do not enjoy. the indigenous tribes you mentioned, in addition to working less, fighting less, & being happier, also generally had no courts, democracies, or 'law & order'. there is no reason why we couldn't have relatively lawless, relatively peaceful societies and still have the internet, or whatever else we desired. why would there be?
peace,
D
liberty and law, freedom and chaos
"I will not live in a society where there is no law, where I have no basis to determine what my liberties are and are not. "
Wha?
How 'bout this "law"?
You are free to do what you wish as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of another. Or, your right to punch ends at my nose. Its called The Law of Mutual Self Respect.
Of course the future will require autonomous groups of people working together in order to make a living. Thats all that a tribe is. But, once we bring the odious idea of law into it then we create heirarchy(after all, someone must enforce the laws) and the tribe is no more. Liberty and law cannot coexist.
The Ubiquitous Nature of The Law
Laws are prevalent in all indiginous cultures, especially in tribal culture; laws that have evolved naturally over many thousands of years. These communities usually abide by strict, elaborate codes of social taboos and moors that often involve very complex hierarchical systems. The notion that tribal society is a pseudonym for an anarchic utopia is completely erroneous.
Law is ubiquitous. We are always being confronted with moral, ethical, and cultural value conflicts. We weigh these concepts and make decisions based on our cultural makeup and personal experiences. Anarchy is a contradiction because "no law" or some equivalent social contract is also a law. Every society has a social contract, a kind of mutual understanding between people to keep the peace. Even nature has a law: survival of the fittest.
The problem with the anarchic model is that it provides few tools for keeping that peace, forcing people into a position where they must create their own laws; laws that reflect personal convictions that are not always in the interest of the community. This is fertile ground for power-hungry warlords or totalitarian regimes, allowing them to rule with absolute, unfettered power. Unlike the relative comfort in which you and I live, people who have actually lived in anarchic states like Rwanda in 1994 were beholden to the whims of ruthless, egomaniacal dictators who raised child-armies that commited heinous acts of violence upon their fellow man.
The Bush-Cheney administration is a perfect example of the disasterous effects of anarchic reform. I suspect many who have advocated for anarchy have also been railing against the abuses of power imposed by The Executive Branch over the last eight years. The President and Vice President have exerted their influence by unilaterally imposing a new social contract upon the American people by dimantling the checks and balances - the laws - that are the foundation of The U.S. Constitution.
The comfortable, educated position you and I are in results from a system of laws that have evolved over 3 to 6 thousand years. Laws outlast their usefulness; that is obvious. They are imperfect and often unfair. In times when those laws have proven dangerous a new social contract has been drafted. This has occurred time and again throughout history. If we as a people reach an impasse and are asked to find a new solution to the challenges that face us we should write a contract that respects those social tools that work in favor of the people, promote individual liberty, and establishes peace between peoples
Entheos Genesthai
If it takes 1000 years...
...to achieve an anarchist society then that would be a bargain. It is the most exquisite form of society that we can possibly imagine. A true brotherhood of man. The socialist democracies would pail by comparison.
I think the underlying question is whether crime is a natural phenomenon within our biology or a symptom of our culture. Did indigenous tribes have armed robbers, serial killers or child rapists? For that matter has any other species ever had such a thing? And could any other culture produce such a thing as a free speech zone or a war on drugs or a department of homeland security?
As far as Rwanda is concerned, its a good example of a chaotic situation or grass roots fascism, but I don't see that it has a damn thing to do with anarchy. To what degree did the destabilizing outside forces of global capitalism contribute to the situation in Rwanda? In a true anarchist society education is a given, as is any necessity that contributes to the quality of life. You seem to think that an anarchist society would be driven by individual greed and that brings us back to the underlying question again which is, what is human nature?
Morals values and ethics aren't even in the same ballpark as laws and comparing man made laws to natural laws is like comparing the u.s. tax code to the laws of physics. Laws are created to protect the have a lots from the have nothings and that class stratification has always been and will always be the purpose of the rule of law. Those with the badges and the truncheons will always be drunk with power and corrupted. Like Carlin said, you have no rights, you only have privileges and those in power will take those privileges away if they so wish.
social contract
good points, han shan.
i would add that the whole concept of a 'social contract' only came about when hobbes got the brilliant idea for the modern state, his 'leviathan', which he felt was necessary because "life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short". So we see that the concept of the social contract presupposes a dismal view of nature & human nature, to which the contract is supposed to be a check. I personally don't subscribe to that view of human nature, nor, i think do many other people.... at the very least, human nature is mutable, capable of assuming infinite variations.
also, keith - what on earth
The Difficulties of Language
Devon, you and I probably have divergent views of human nature. I would describe our disagreement as a conflict between cynicism/skepticism and existentialism/idealism. Despite this difference of opinion I think there are places where you and I agree. My impression is that this has turned into a semantic debate. The anarchist camp and I are using different lexicons; connotations that have evolved from personal experience or denotations derived from different philosophies.
I believe there is some common ground here. We agree that The Executive branch has abused its powers and is shifting authority away from The American People. We agree that our society needs reform allowing for greater liberties within the scope of personal freedom. We agree that the monetary system is broken and there needs to be a practical and useful system of reflecting human relationships within society that works on behalf of the community. I think we even agree that things like education, public transportation, sustainable design, and a communications grid are important.
We are using a different language to describe these concepts. I would call the organizational principle that reinforces societal structures like education, public transportation, etc. as law. Perhaps you would describe it as communal cooperation and consent. I don't know. I would describe a system of mediating the interests of individuals within a society as an economy. Perhaps you would describe it as the common good. I don't know.
I would also describe the initiative taken by individuals in a society who cultivate broad support for a project, idea, or course of action as leaders and their advocates as followers. I refer to this as a hierarchy. Are you opposed to the concept of a leader-follower model; even if it's the relationship between the matriarch or shaman and their tribe? I don't think these things - what I call law, hierarchy, and economy - could be removed from any group of people working together in a community. I do think that they need to be relatively mutable, absolutely functional, and work on behalf of the community by maintaining peace between peoples. Perhaps you can define in more specific terms the principles guiding your conception of anarchy . . .
Entheos Genesthai
kropotkin
the philosophy of anarchism is pretty well formulated by peter kropotkin, among others. if you're interested in learning about it, i would check him out. i don't have the energy to go into it all now, but there is a whole wealth of ideas to be explored if you're interested. i think the semantic difference we are running into is the common one - you are using anarchy to refer to chaotic, unchecked destruction, which is how it is normally understood. literally, though, the word means 'without rule' or 'without government'. anarchists believe that this condition is actually an ideal one for organizing a free and peaceful society, if only because rulers and governors seem to exhibit inevitably coercive and violent tendencies. anarchists suspect that freedom and peace may be totally antithetical to government and law. if that sounds like idealism, i would only ask you to look at the evidence presented by the past few thousand years of experimentation with archic institutions.
peace, D
www.myspace.com/thedeclineofthewest
no shamans no matriarchs
Kropotkin links
Propaganda Anonymous
Mr. Peter Krotopkin. A rocking intellectual and scientist.
He seems most famous for his book Mutual Aid, which if Free! on-line.
The basic observations he made in this book, as far as I got anyway, was that within Nature (animals and the like) species were more likely to come to aid another more so than to be at war with one another.
And also that this tendency occured with humans the further away they were from centralized Authority.
The Word Anarchism has been maligned throughout it's usage. PErhaps it is because the man who shot and killed Franz Ferdinand, and as the story goes, next came WW1, called himself an Anarchist and many have attached the feelings evoked from that event to the word ever after.
There are actually many different kinds of Anarchists.
There are those that were into the use of violence to achieve goals, like Errico Malatesta.
There were those like Emma Goldmann who believed that one did not need to resort to violence to achieve the goals if one was well organized enough
Then you have the Christian Pacisfist tradition of Leo Tolstoy
You also have the American Anarchist Tradition that seemed to have influenced the Libertarian party here in the states
That's really just scrqatching the surface.
And one thing that nearly all of these thinkers have in common under the rubric of 'Anarchism' is that interpersonal behaviors between people practicing Anarchism is that of a 'higher' order, and very very far from Animalist Chaos.....That's what Authoritarian Capitalism produces, according to these thinkers.
'the 21st century will be anarchic, if it is to be at all.'
thanks for adding the links PA.
the history of anarchist terrorism is actually much more involved than just the teenage kid that shot archduke ferdinand. in fact the word terrorist first came into popular use as a synonym for anarchist. there were many instances of assassination and bombing in europe during the hot period between the 1870's and the 1930's. there were several high profile incidents in america, as well. the wall street bombing in 1920, which killed 38, was widely believed to have been committed by anarchists. even sweet emma goldman was invoved in a plot to assassinate the industrialist henry clay frick, and the man who murdered president mckinley was an anarchist. at that time emma decried the violence and offered to personally dress the presidents wounds. she also offered up a theory of anarchist violence in which she described an upsurge of love and rage in a lone, powerless member of the oppressed class, which, having no creative outlet, could only be expressed in destruction. so while she denounced violence, she never denounced the actual culprits of the violence, putting the blame back on capitalist authority for creating the conditions in which good men felt compelled to act violently.
i mention all this only because i don't want to pretend that anarchism is only a peace & love, 'utopian' movement. it has blood on its hands like any other political theory does (although its body count is millions less than any of the other major revolutionary movements, including liberal democracy). however, the 19th and 20th centuries were the age of political violence. a pacifist ideology would hardly have rung true to many workers or revolutionaries at that time, considering the brutality they encountered at the first sign of opposition. but it did ring true to some, and many of the first pacifists were anarchists, in practice at least. gandhi himself received letters from the christian anarchist, tolstoy, councilling him on the 'struggle of the tender against the harsh, of meekness and love against pride and violence'. Thoureau ('the best government is that which governs not at all') was another biggie for gandhi.
i think the 21st century offers us, through the rapid expansion of technical, cultural & spiritual interconnectedness, the opportunity to achieve an anarchist society without any acts of aggression. people are already advocating anarchist organization without using the dreaded word - the ideas in 'here comes everbody', 'multitude', peer2peer, are all essentially anarchic. rather than a destruction of order, they represent a higher complexity of order. the sovereign state - entrenched, resistant to change, violent, corrupt - is giving way to networks of individuals and free associations who are able to act collectively without any authoritarian infrastructure or hierarchies of command.
i believe malraux said, 'the 21st century will be mystical, if it is to be at all'. the political analogue to that would be, 'the 21st century will be anarchic, if it is to be at all.' as we see today, the longer we cling to old ideas of law & order, states and religious authorities, the closer we get to the brink of destruction. the highly responsive, mutable, interconnected nature of anarchist organization is far more suited to the globalized world, just as the universality of the mystical experience is more appropriate to the spiritual life of a planet bound together in cultural, ecological, economic and technological webs.
peace, D
www.myspace.com/thedeclineofthewest
nice people don't need laws.
i belive
What planet am **I** living on?
Because from what I'm reading in this thread, it appears to me it isn't the Fantasy Island you're all on.
Let me try and put things into perspective.
You and your family have been made to borrow (for wars et al) TRILLIONS of dollars (with interest accruing everyday) which you simply cannot EVER pay. Period.
On top of that, almost everything that you “own” at the moment has been paid with credit.
Now the economy crashes (on purpose, as this is has been by Design) and "coincidently" there is NO bankruptcy anymore (with the new laws you will have to pay back what you owe “the Man” one way or the other)....
And you think the ones that engineered all this “brilliant mess” for a *particular purpose* have done so so that in turn you can live a brand new “hippie life in your communities with family and friends”?
And stiff THEM with your bad debt??? Really?
THINK AGAIN.
A BIG MAJOR WAR (possibly WWW3) has been in the works and therefore will “breakout” soon via a "terrar" attack. WHY?
Basically, to put YOU to work - for the TRILLIONS “you” owe the bankers/ and the “fed” (gov)!!! TRILLIONS.
What work you might ask? As there isn't any? Eh?
WAR.
The plan appears to be to take almost ALL males 18-45 - via the draft - out of the US so that the WOLVES… have free reign over the hen house… full of hens and young chicks, don't you know.
Yes, keep fantasizing on "how good is all going to get" when the s*** hits .
And please don’t come back with “you’re being too negative” or any such malarkey.
It isn’t that I’m not an “optimist.” Nor am I really a pessimist for that matter. I am, however, a REALIST .
And this position I hold is based on ALL the information that is out there. Not “conspiracy theories” but rather hard numbers.
What was done over in Iraq recently will be done to us. It's call "cause and effect."
As someone wrote recently, “Also interesting talking about all the bailouts and takeovers – [David] Icke is right - these corporations in essence aren't collapsing as such, they are merely merging and nothing's changed. At the top of the pyriamid, they control it all and it is all cold and calculated maniplulation. The 'turmoil' is manipulated. Centralisation is the goal."
And I already shared towars what end.
WAKE UP!!! IT'S LATER THAN YOU THINK!!
Anyway, for those interested in David Icke...
First Hour: Trends analyst Gerald Celente comments on the economy. Then, actress Debbie Reynolds chats about her career.
Audio Links:
http://38.99.88.122:3016 mms://1.uni4.susq.streamaudio.com/KCMO_AM
http://67.212.67.19:3010
Stew
paranoia / pronoia
As we have discussed on this site repeatedly, the concept that everything happening is a planned conspiracy orchestrated by evil genius madmen is as much a projection of one's psychological disposition as the equally stupid perspective that there are no "operative conspiracies" among secret government factions.
I think there is general panic among many in the ruling elite about what has happened - many were not prepared and had much or all of their wealth in these brokerage accounts. I think that those in power of course try to take advantage of all situations that arise to further their own power, but they are flying a bit blind at this point as well. It seems they made the mistake of believing their own bullshit - remember the comment about "you in the reality-based community" from the New York Times Magazine.
I feel that perspectives like this one so vociferously presented by Mysterioso are part of the problem. I never hear tangible and practical steps that real people can take - only outrage and negativity and frustration. If there is some rational and meaningful program behind his shouts, it would be interesting - and at this point, quite surprising - to hear it.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
it's all my fault...
I meant it as a joke, but it got so out of hand, they started handing out contracts and branding stuff, bigass bank going on and it slipped out from under me, the aliens were a bit of a balancing element but they had never seen this kind of chaos so they like bailed and took half my cd collection before I could bake it into MP3s, the bastards...;-)
Danny, did I say I love you today? If not I'm sorry...more proof of my all the good folks are dishing out the sweet stuff..."Rollin rollin rollin
Though the streams are swollen
Keep them doggies rolling... "
I leave you with a quotation from SAmuel Clemons
a working class hero is something to be.
intentional communities