Toxic Runoff

A natural-gas rush in some of New York and Pennsylvania's most pristine habitats could have serious negative consequences for the water supply of New York City. The Marcellus Shale holds possibly the largest reservoir of natural gas discovered so far in the United States, as much as 500 trillion cubic feet.
As gas companies send their "landmen" on prospecting hunts, armed with contracts that boast the possibility to make millions, a struggle has already manifested between those eager to strike it rich and those who are aware of the consequences of drilling - natural spaces transformed into loud industrial zones, drill pads, pipelines, access roads and all. While the rigs have already begun drilling in Pennsylvania, the land around the Catskills has yet to be tapped. Even so, Governor Paterson signed a bill this past summer streamlining the permit process, so that gas companies could begin operating in the spring.
Greater than the risks of the drilling process itself is the concern of the horizontal hydraulic fracturing process, called "fracing," which shakes the ground like an earthquake. In Wyoming, where fracing has occurred since 2003, residents report spoiled drinking water and structural damage to their foundations. The chemical recipe for blasting open the shale and freeing the gas was developed by Halliburton and is a trade secret. Yet, an independent study of fraced wells in Wyoming identified over 400 chemical toxins in contaminated soil and groundwater, some of which include carcinogens such as ethylbenzene, chromium, and arsenic.
Yet the Energy Policy Act of 2005 creates a loophole for oil and gas companies to avoid accountability and thus prosecution. In fact, in the name of reducing dependence on foreign oil, such companies are exempt from major environmental-protection laws like the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act.
If drilling is allowed in the Catskill watershed, the results could be disastrous. Half of the state's population counts on the watershed to provide drinking water. 1.2 billion gallons of unfiltered water reach the city each day driven almost entirely by gravity. In fact, it is the largest unfiltered surface-supply water system in America.
Environmental groups such as Riverkeeper and Catskill Mountainkeeper have called for a ban on gas collection above the city's watershed. Act now to prevent fracing in New York.
Story suggested by Lewis Kofsky.
Image: "My Water Supply" by CarbonNYC on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing."
Tweet
- 12-14-08
- Alan Scheurman's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Energy 'Independence'
This same thing is happening on Native American lands, national parks, etc, all over the country. The move for 'energy independance' is having a terrible effect on some of our most prized -- and only remaining -- natural spaces. In our fear, we have sold them out to the highest bidder.
We cannot let this occur.
The same people who brought the sewer pipes turn another small piece of the Pine Barrens into money every few weeks. Probably when there's nothing left, and the last of the watershed is poisoned, the people who are responsible for killing the beaver will know the helpless sense of irreversible loss Rick and I had felt.
-- Tom Brown, Jr.
"The words are all around,
but the words are only sounds;
and nobody seems to listen...
and still they'll say,
"Well how could we have known?"
I'll tell them its really not so hard to tell:
you keep adding stones,
and soon the water will
be lost in the well."
--Traffic in the Sky, Jack Johnson
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi
Insane
Stop this as soon as possible. Get this message out all over NYC. It would be great to see all of New York City and across the State working together to stop this. Otherwise this habitat will look, and/or feel, something like this.
It is so incredibly astonishing that trading clean water and strong foundations for oil&gas is even considered.
C'mon New York, (and the rest of the world) set a precedent.
from an activist
i asked an activist how to stop it, and received this answer:
There are four fronts to fight on. 1- federal, get the Feds to bring gas development back under there jurisdiction (the 2005 energy act exempts natural gas development from clean air act, safe drinkingwater act etc... leaving all regs up to the state in our case DEC) hopefully Salazar will get interior and we have an ally there. 2- state - get the DEC to do its job (unlikely). We have just submitted extensive comments on the scoping document that will regulate drilling in the state. The draft scope that DEC created was pathetic. If you would like a copy of our comments I would be happy to send them along. This is part of the long and winding state regulatory strategy. The point is IF they are going to drill then the HAVE to do it in a way that protects the environment (again unlikely or impossible).
3 - city - New York City has to stand up for itself in this because the state won't. State wants the revenue and will say and has said "Don't worry about it, we have been regulating Nat Gas in NYS for years without a problem". Unfortunatelly this new Halliburton hydro-fracking process is highly toxic and requires 5 million gallons of water per well per frack job that gets polluted and then dumped. That means taking water out of the watershed, polluting it and then dealing with it somehow. 30 percent of the polluted water is left underground -and who knows where that ends up. The toxic chems include Benzine, 2BE etc which are seriously dangerous in miniscule amounts. NYS has never dealt with anything like this. They are completely and totally unprepared in every way to deal with this. No budget, no staff and no understanding of how serious the threat is. 4- awareness, outreach, education. The challenge is to get accurate information and to diseminate it to the public, press and electeds. This industry is REALLY good at what they do, they have extensive experience out west in getting things there way. They have enourmous resources to throw at PR and at buying electeds. They are very effective at getting leases and at making opponents seem like wack jobs. So we have to do our best with our limited resources to combat the industry.
Thanks for this
Liquid Natural Gas(LNG) pipelines in Oregon and America
New Year Resolution: No LNG pipelines in Oregon or New York
The blinding light of a sobering reality is in our faces again, now that the buzz of Holiday cheer wears off. Like a wicked hangover, the Oregon Liquid Natural Gas(LNG) pipeline proposal will not go away with a simple pain reliever. The same kind of hangover that Coal and Nuclear power industries have caused over the years.
I thought of three new cocktail names for the Palomar and TransCanada corporations Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Oregon pipeline plan. The “Clear-cut LNG Chardonnay Spritzer”, “Mt. Hood LNG Terminator Stout”, and the intoxicating “LNG Island Ice Tea.”
It should be noted that even one of these beverages is irresponsible drinking and could send the average Oregonian into a coma. Palomar and TransCanada corporation with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, are like bad bartenders over-serving toxic cocktails to water thirsty customers.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC)is the energy industries, friendly federal agency. FERC has endorsed the Oregon LNG plan and believes a LNG pipeline is critically needed energy and a sound environmental idea. Working together they have persuaded NW Natural Gas to join the project.
In fact, FERC has endorsed over eighty proposed LNG pipeline sites across America. Most of the construction for these sites have been delayed with environmental lawsuits.
FERC has been in the pockets of large corporate polluters for decades. The commission has both advocated and created the term, “Clean Coal”. The term “Clean-Coal” is an oxymoron and was used by both political parties through out the presidential campaign. There is no such thing as “Clean-Coal”, its a dirty and toxic energy source. The only thing “green” about it, is the color of money.
Recently, in Tennessee, millions of gallons of toxic coal sludge has spilled out destroying Agriculture and drinking water in that community. The coal industry spokesman stated they didn’t know how long it would take to clean up, or how to clean it up and if they could ever clean it up entirely. Arsenic and other toxins are permanently in the environment.
FERC, currently tells the public that Nuclear-reactors are a great idea, both safe and clean.
A decade after the people of Oregon forced the closure of Hanford Nuclear facility on the Columbia River, wind surfers have unexplained illnesses and rashes. Fishermen describe fish with extra eyes and mutated spinal bones found downstream.
FERC, leaves the radioactive contamination facts out of the, “safe and clean”, Nuclear energy endorsement.
These are the same kind of shortsighted energy policies that Palomar and TransCanada plan for the LNG pipeline. They tell the public that this is a safe energy source with no environmental impacts or risk.
The Federal guidelines required to build LNG pipelines mandate a 100 foot clear-cut on both sides of the path. This is stated for necessary “safety precautions”. A proposed 73 mile portion of the pipeline travels through the protected Mt. Hood forest. This means that additional road construction and increased logging for the Mt. Hood Wilderness.
Environmental researchers prove clear cuts cause mudslides in rivers and have massive environmental impacts that are catastrophic to our public forests. Fishermen tell us that the mudslides destroy salmon runs and prevent the salmon ability to navigate up streams. As the climate continues to warm, clear-cut forests have increased fire probability and turn public forests into tender boxes and powder kegs.
LNG is made with the high pressure compression of natural gas and freezing it at a negative 260 degrees Fahrenheit. This makes it more violative and dangerous as it runs through metal pipes in the forest. If the pipeline is disrupted through earthquakes or a single human error, the result is like throwing a bomb of highly flammable jet fuel on our already terrible dry and mismanaged public forests. A loss of valuable, public forest resources, private properties and probably human lives.
Pacific-Green Party of Oregon has many members in opposition on this issue with many groups and individuals working years on public education of LNG.
For example,Steve Jones and Jody McCaffree, are the founders of Citizens Against LNG and their campaign web site is Citizensagainstlng.com. This group is based in North Bend and pioneered the opposition against Liquid Natural Gas. Steve Jones questions the environmental impacts and public safety surrounding the proposal. They have fought the Jordan Cove proposal in Coos County and recently gained a legal victory from the Oregon Land Use Board.
The Jordan Cove pipeline proposal would allow LNG to be stored and shipped in large ocean vessels. These LNG ships are literally enormous floating bombs. Schools, hospitals and ocean marine life near the proposed location are all at risk. The Coos County environmental impact is enormous, all in the name of LNG profits.
The Federal guidelines for LNG transportation in Jordan Cove requires both Coast Guard ship and helicopter escorts. Helicopter costs alone are three thousand dollars an hour. The continual estimated cost of Federal escorts is at two hundred thousand dollars per LNG shipload. LNG campaign wants American tax dollars to be used for assisting their private profits.
Another example of wasted tax money for energy profits is President Bush and Vice President Cheney Republican friends at HalliBurton Incorporated. HalliBurton has been profitting in Afghanistan and Iraq for several years with natural gas and petroleum pipelines. A total injustice and outrage to all American taxpayers.
In addition, Palamar/TransCanada CEO Peter Hanson and Vice President Mohammed Alrai, are involved with shady foreign investors. Some sources report that there are Middle Eastern interests and possible Iranian interests involved in Canadian owned LNG projects. More research needs to be done on the International connections behind LNG projects.
The LNG pipeline campaign web site is www.oregonlng.com. The web site was designed to address the property owners and legislative concerns. The environmental impacts of LNG are missing from the web site propaganda. Take a look at it and judge for yourself.
In conclusion, Liquid Natural Gas, Nuclear and Coal energy are risky gambles with our environment and a threat to public safety. LNG pipelines place Oregon and the entire countries quality of life in jeopardy. LNG industries are misleading the public and distorting environmental impact studies. It is fradulent to claim that LNG is a local Oregon project to meet Oregon energy needs. LNG would be shipped to other countries and the pipeline is designed to fuel California. Palomar and TransCanada increase their profits internationally, with total disregard for the communities they are exploiting.
LNG is an unneeded risk, much like over consuming too many “LNG Island Ice Teas” after a holiday party and speeding in a car. Consuming less energy, while advocating and constructing wind and solar power are safer and greener alternatives.
A toast to the Pacific-Green Party of Oregon, Mr. Bill Bradbury of the State of Oregon, Steve Jones and Jody McCaffree with Citizens Against LNG and for their continued work opposing LNG pipelines in Oregon.
In Salem, on January 13th, Citizens against LNG will lobbied legislatures to do the sober, responsible thing and oppose the LNG pipeline proposals. I encourage everyone to join my New Year resolution and tell your Legislatures to the same.