Support our Kickstarter

Scientists Create Synthetic Life

syntheticlife.jpg

Scientists in the US have successfully created artificial life with the development of a living cell controlled by synthetic DNA. Scientists copied an existing bacterial genome, and by using "synthesis machines," they chemically constructed a copy of its sequenced genetic code.

Dr. Craig Venter, the leading researcher in breakthrough development, "likened the advance to making new software for the cell." The process involves placing the synthetic chromosome and transplanting it into a recipient cell of a different organism. As stated by Venter, once the software, or synthetic cell, is introduced to the foreign organism, the cell reads the upload, deciphers it's coding, and then converts it into the genetic language of the new host cell.

The plan for this new development is to use these newly created bacteria to aid in useful functions in such fields as health care, and alternate energy. According to Venter, "If we can really get cells to do the production that we want, they could help wean us off oil and reverse some of the damage of the environment by capturing carbon dioxide."

Dr. Venter and his colleagues are already collaborating with pharmaceutical and fuel companies to design new chromosomes to aid in the development of new fuels and vaccines. Critics and environmentalists warn that releasing synthetic bacteria into the environment via new organisms has the potential to do more harm than good. History has made us aware of the dangers of introducing foreign life into individual ecosystems, and the devastating effects they can have on local populations.

Despite the criticisms, it is possible to imagine that if used purely to benefit the well being of all life--and not the life of a corporation--this new breakthrough could mean a step to greater balance with ourselves, and our planet.

 

Image, "Green Tech" by jurvetson on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing.

 

 

Comments

Its quiet in here...

I cant believe there isnt already a debate going on here. Is RS asleep? While this is too immature of a finding to be of any immediate use, the implications are staggering, both the great possibilities of programming nature to help deal with our mess, and the all too likely possibility that this dabbling will only get us deeper in trouble. No cries that this is an abomination? That we are engineering our own demise? That science may save us, or doom us? There was a much bigger outcry about the lab-made meat quest, whereas this is, so far, the process that most deserves the "humanity playing god" moniker and yet...silence.

Yeah, I found it quite cool

Yeah, I found it quite cool until the "already collaborating with pharmaceutical and fuel companies"-part. Cant say I know of any other sector that is more deserving of the evil corpotrations award. Scary stuff

Bio-ethics and the future of science

Yes there are lots of ethical issues which could be discussed. Will be interesting to see what happens.

Research for all the wrong reasons

Genetic engineering is just like any other technology or realm of knowledge, it's use can be used for positive or negative changes. But this development, if used for oil companies, or companies in general, will just help sustain the corporate institutions . If we were in a more sane economic system without stratification and profit motive, we could be using our knowledge of genetics to genetically erase cancer, and other negative traits we've naturally acquired in our evolution. But what good does that do when the world needs sickness?

EVERYTHING IS GOD

Ok so here is the only thing I have to say. We are all divine, everything that we discover is suppose to happen, everything is as it should be and what is up with the "PLAYING GOD" thing, as to my understanding we are all god and I feel we should stop with the separation of our experience from that of an evolving creator. WE ARE ALL ONE IN THE SAME!!! "We are the Divine Light that shines infinitely." Brandy Sarasvati

"IF used purely to benefit

"IF used purely to benefit the well being of all life" - thats the crux. Where do we see this fulfilled in our system of military complexes and rich oil moguls? Anyhow, Im sure synthetic DNA has already been developed many years ago, again I'm thinking of the military (theyre usually a couple of decades ahead than everybody else). The question is how well synthetic DNA works in the long term..