Stimulus Package for Relationships

orangeacidbig.jpg

 

Stimulus Understanding

"A man doesn't learn to understand anything unless he loves it." --Goethe

There is a guy banging his head against a brick wall. When asked why he is banging his head against the brick wall, he pauses and says because "it feels so good when I stop." It is a silly story of truth for millions. We continue to bang our heads against the same brick walls, partly because it feels good when we stop, but also because we don't know how to do it differently. More often than not, our response to life stimulus remains the same. In order for any stimulus to really move us into a new place we have learn how to think in a new way and risk giving up the old brick wall.

In one of my favorite reads of late, Stumbling on Happiness, author Daniel Gilbert gives a thorough understanding of the way we are fooled not just by our memory of what has happened but also by our imagination when we project what will happen in the future and how we will feel about it. We humans don't really learn from each other. Whether it is planning to have a child or starting a new business, we simply refuse to believe that other people's experience will inform our own. I remember distinctly the advice I got from another local small business owner when I was starting out and I was convinced at the time that my experience would be different. Same for parenting; questions answered from more experienced parents just sounded jaded; little did I know how soon my own responses would resemble theirs.

The reason that we can't learn from other's experience is because it is the experience itself which is the teacher. We retain less than 5% of what we are told (lecturers take note), 10% of what we read, 30% of what we are shown, but what we teach we actually own. This of course raises the question, what is the point of education -- to learn or to teach? As far as life lessons go, the answer is one and the same. Our education in life is at once student and teacher. This too is the rub, for how do we expand our capacity to imagine and re-think our life and relationships in a new way, when our personal experience is not broad enough to help us out of where we are stuck?

Learning is a two step process -- discovery and mastery. We all have innate capacity for both. Keeping our capacity for discovery vital is one key to lifelong learning and the ability to make different choices with the same stimulus. Children have a penchant for discovery: that is what their days are about. Adults can lose sight of this part of the learning process as they strive for mastery in their life, which is the other half of learning. Mastery is essential; it is where our experience teaches both ourselves and others. It builds our sense of self and as adults defines our identity. But without the openness to discovery, mastery can turn into a short walk to a brick wall. In relationships it often looks like how we leave. Love demands that we continuously discover the other and our relationship over and over again.

President Obama was quoted recently on what keeps his relationship with his wife so vital. "Sometimes when we're lying together, I look at her and I feel dizzy with the realization that here is another distinct person from me, who has memories, origins, thoughts, feelings that are different from my own. That tension between familiarity and mystery meshes something strong between us. Even if one builds a life together based on trust, attentiveness and mutual support, I think that it is important that a partner continues to surprise." Recognizing the mystery that exists in every relationship is another way of defining a learning life.

It is true that we don't really understand anything until we love it, which is the continuous dance between discovery and mastery in the hours we spend at what matters most to us.

 

Third Dimensional Stimulus

"Stimulus is the missing third dimension in all theories of motivation." --David Freemantle

With all the discussion of economic crisis going on today, there is little recognition of the even deeper poverty of heart which like a creeping malaise impacts the very core of our wellbeing, our life and the meaning we derive from it. Recent studies by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago found that over the last twenty years over one in four of us have no one with which to discuss important life issues or to confide in compared to only 7% in 1985. Loneliness doesn't get much air time because it is still so stigmatized. Many people cannot discern loneliness from depression or anxiety and feel like describing themselves in this context describes them as social outcast or worse.

Actually loneliness has more in common with the physiological human functions of hunger, thirst and pain. The impulse for social connection, which is built in to our neural wiring, is rooted in the basic urge to survive. We are not wired to live alone, researchers say. "The need to deal with other people is so great, says Cacioppo, author of Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection that, in large part, made us who and what we are today." Most neuroscientists agree, he said, that it was the need to process social cues that led to the expansion of the cortical mantle of the brain. And yet loneliness grows in the midst of more social connecting devices than we may have ever imagined twenty years ago. This is in large part due to the confusion we all share about what constitutes real relationships. The "friends" and "connections" that we may be adding up online often serve to only distract us from the few real friendships and intimate connections that fill our real 3D time. It is easy to see how this happens, our busyness and the ease with which we conduct those two dimensional relationships favors them.

Real relationships are three dimensional. They use all of our senses and exist in real time. Not unlike the difference of playing basketball on a screen, or getting out and using your whole body. The real game is intensive and can be demanding. We are wired to play and relate with our whole being. The relationships that share your kitchen, your bedroom and your heart are the ones that make your life whole and full. Yet they also often require us to give of ourselves in ways that make us stretch and grow. Friendships and intimates often demand us to give up the need to be right and give in to the need to be related to the people we love. The give and take of keeping things real is the work of love and the satisfaction of being right is not nearly what it is cracked up to be. The number of relationships that have and continue to be sacrificed to our idea of how others should behave is both tragic and shredding the social fabric of our time.

The same three dimensional comparisons could be drawn about our sexuality. The numbers of people who pay for two dimensional sexual contact is staggering. Virtual sexuality carries none of the physical benefits of the act in 3D and often leaves you feeling lonelier than when you began. While the secrecy and clandestine fantasy that virtual sex affords might titillate, it will never heal. Demand the real thing in your intimate life and don't give your life energy away to stimulate a screen.

If the economic crisis has any upside, it is that it might just make us more aware of the wealth of friends and loved ones that have gotten lost in the speed and intensity of life in the fast lane. Shifting our energy back to the heart of our life relationships has the power to re-invent how you spend your time and how you think about your life goals. Reach out to the people in your life that you may have only been texting and share a meal. Call and chat with an old friend that you haven't spoken with. Re-focus your days with true 3D relationship time and enjoy a lasting stimulus in your life work.

 

Social Brain Stimulus

"Communication leads to community, that is, to understanding, intimacy and mutual valuing." --Rollo May

We are wired to connect to each other. Daniel Goleman's new book, Social Intelligence, has uncovered new research on social neuroscience has identified brain cells, termed mirror neurons, which actually link us, brain to brain in social interaction. The complex neural circuitry that activates in the brain in every social interaction from the smallest exchanges with a store clerk to the complex negotiations with our life partners not only helps you know what is happening in the interaction, but also cues you on how to respond to keep interactions civil and functional. This also explains why other people's emotional life is as contagious as the common cold. Studies have shown that a single individual who is either happy or sad can change an entire group's collective mood for better or worse in a matter of minutes. So it is not your imagination that you start feeling bad shortly after your partner or kid walks in shrouded in gloom. In my household of six, many of whom are growing adolescents, the mood factor is anything but stable. So while I might be wired with a social brain as part of my biological imperative, maintaining strong social connections is hard work and requires practice.

I think our relationship avoidant nature might have been one of the unstated impetuses for the Internet revolution. The digital communication devices that have come to dominate our social interactions don't ask anything of our social brain, which explains why people will do and say things on their emails and text messages that they would never do in a face to face interaction. Parental concerns over the obsessive texting that dominates teenage life with kids continuously splitting their attention from the people they are with and the continuous inane conversations that are buzzing the phones is just the tip of the iceberg. Research suggests that the idea of becoming a "crackberry" is not just a psychological phenomenon. The continuous rush of dopamine during instant communications can actually create a physical addiction with the classic withdrawal symptoms.

Ironically, it is our need for social interaction that drives our obsession to connect digitally. Continuous messaging makes us feel good and important, even if most of the communications that are exchanged is just banter. Flirting has taken on new meaning for the younger generation where instead of a look, they get a text message. The devices that we believed would enhance our ability to communicate and connect actually interfere with the real relationships we crave. The ease of two dimensional, digital communications make it natural to prioritize them over our real relationships, because they don't engage your social brain the way face to face encounters do. But the danger and risks of substituting digital relations for the real thing is deep and pervasive in our culture. The number of relationships that have been terminated by text message is a small marker for the lack of practice and skill building that the new millennial generation is cultivating in developing full relationships.

Sexuality too, is impacted by our new and growing dependence on digital communications. The new phenomenon of "sexting" where over 30% of more than 1200 young people reported sending nude photos is another manifestation of technological "connecting" without the wisdom of the social brain. The same girls, who would send their naked body over digital technology, would never consider stripping in front of the same eyes. Even more disturbing is the social brain asleep at the wheel, with a recent survey showing over 66% of 18-24-year-olds reported texting while driving, which is provoking many states to institute laws prohibiting cell phone use while driving.

Boundaries need to be drawn, distinguishing between the work of relating and the convenience of chatting or texting. We need to be vigilant to the human moment when we are right next to someone and create a virtual boundary around the machine in our hand. The skill of being present to the moment and the activities that develop our social brain functioning happen in the midst of attending to our primary relationships, face to face. Most of the messages that take us away from the people we love most are inconsequential and can wait.

Our relationships mold not just our experience, but our biology. The mirroring that happens in human interacting shapes us in ways as subtle as sharing humor and as profoundly as how our immune system activates in the continuous battle against bacteria and viruses. The social interaction we crave heals us. Now more than ever we need to teach and learn that the relationships that fill our real time, real life are the priority. They are the only means we have to learning that life is a social event, not a virtual one.

 

Intimacy Stimulus

"I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain one's self on the earth is not a hardship but a pastime- if we live simply and wisely." --Henry David Thoreau

Franklin D. Roosevelt is most famous for his statement "there is nothing to fear but fear itself." He uttered these words in a scratchy radio broadcast to a terrified nation when, like now, all of the systems we had come to rely on were failing. Anxiety is the new norm in most homes today, as bad news seems to only get worse. The foundations of life have cracked for millions and our young government is taking decisive action to shore up the economic disaster, to stabilize people's living situations and create work opportunities. It is the new, New Deal. Stimulus plans of this magnitude are incentives, designed to incite us to action. They will not work if we all sit back and expect them to cause a response of their own accord.

The need for a stimulus plan in our lives is not just national, it is personal. It is in our individual lives where we must begin to reinvent ways of consuming, learning and loving that are sustainable. In times of fear and anxiety, we must harness our human instinct of fight/flight to our advantage. The statistics of wellbeing and happiness in the context of thriving families carries even more weight during difficult societal crises.

Often this is precisely when many relationships fail. Our fight response, which should galvanize us to search for better living conditions or new employment, can turn inward toward the people who are there to love you. Blame is the least helpful of all responses. The thought which works to keep me authentic and honest in my relationships during these stressful times is this one: In the last moments of my life, I know the only thing that will have any meaning and that will fill my mind and heart is the people I loved and those who loved me in return. It always helps me remember what matters most in my life.

Another more reliable measure of your economic wellbeing is right in your bedroom. Good sex is worth more than money. There is no other activity with such great impact on your physical, mental and emotional well being available to you during hard economic times. The Money, Sex, and Happiness: An Empirical Study, performed by two economists at Dartmouth and the University of Warwick, analyzed data on the self-reported levels of sexual activity and happiness of 16,000 people. The report concluded that sex "enters so strongly (and) positively in happiness equations" that they estimate increasing intercourse from once a month to once a week is equivalent to the amount of happiness generated by getting an additional $50,000 in income for the average American.

In fact, the economists calculate that a lasting marriage equates to happiness generated by getting an extra $100,000 each year. Divorce, meanwhile, translates to a happiness depletion of $66,000 annually. People who consider themselves happy are usually richer in sexual activity. So you see there are many ways to count your wealth and given that the old standard of stocks and bonds is so shaky. Using the real metrics of love and intimacy, which is what we are here to accumulate anyway, makes good economic sense in these troubled times and will provide the basis for a stimulus plan that can last.

Image by orangeacid, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

a lot of them bite

Dear Wendy,

Yours is a nice idea, but in the modern world, most men soon discover that a lot of women are not as blessed in good character as one might hope. In other words, "a lot of them bite!"

Thus increasing numbers of men are turning to other healthy pastimes such as golf, fishing or whatever. It isn't fun, and sometimes it can be quite painful or dangerous.

I hear this all the time from other men over age 30 (who might not speak honestly to you). Such was not the case (so much) in our parents' generation.

Nor are such comments meant to apply to all women. In fact, the reciprocal observation concerning men is probably true also, as most women see it.

Yours is a nice idea, but

Yours is a nice idea, but in the modern world, most men soon discover that a lot of women are not as blessed in good character as one might hope. In other words, "a lot of them bite!"  

 

I'd make a minor change and say that most people are not as blessed with good character as one might hope.  In the US, for example, about 10% of people have some sort of diagnosed mood disorder(undiagnosed is most likely much higher).  It is important to put oneself out there socially in real time, but it is just as important to understand that it is(in a social sense, at least) quite risky.

 

C23

 

Would he were fatter! But I fear him not:
Yet if my name were liable to fear, 
 I do not know the man I should avoid
So soon as that spare Cassius. He reads much;
He is a great observer

I had let myself

drift away from close connections with people for a few years, for security reasons, but now I find face-to-face interaction to be one of the most gratifying ways to spend my time.

Great article, I really appreciate it.

I've learned how to let my own interests fade out of the picture when I speak to someone. I let them have the stage, act out their wants and needs and character, and forget what I want, or even that I exist.

This habit, IMO, is the secret to connecting with anyone.

I no longer crave interaction, because I enjoy it so often and so deeply, even with people I don't especially like.

www.raptitude.com -- The gentle art of sanity amidst civilization

I agree to some extent, but

I agree to some extent, but I think that it is very easy to take this idea overboard such that your social needs aren't satisfied at all which usually leads to bitterness and resentment.  There has to be a balance between surrendering the stage to another person and taking the stage for yourself(this is only needed when you are running with a crowd where they consistently refuse to give up the stage to you).

 

C23 

Would he were fatter! But I fear him not:
Yet if my name were liable to fear, 
 I do not know the man I should avoid
So soon as that spare Cassius. He reads much;
He is a great observer

Good point

and I don't suggest completely eliminating your own wants from the equation.  But I've found that deferring your needs, as a general rule, makes the other person much more likely to want to attend to them later.

Balance is the target, I've found this method helps me get there. Nothing wrong with commandeering the stage yourself, though, now and then.

www.raptitude.com -- The gentle art of sanity amidst civilization

misanthropic

'In the last moments of my life, I know the only thing that will have any meaning and that will fill my mind and heart is the people I loved and those who loved me in return.'

Interesting, but for me I don't think that will be the case, I think I love nature, the planet, more.

I feel I am something of a misanthrope...is that OK?

Although there are people who I love, I feel as though I don't like the human race very much, in it's present state. I don't like how we desecrate our enviroment, I think we are vain and self absorbed, and I think we perhaps crave too much for company because we are so self obsessed we want more and more mirrors in the form of other people?

Mission Orientation

(I'd originally written a reply to the main article, using exactly the quote you cited as starting point.

Then I deleted it, thinking, "Well, there's a diversity of perspectives, and I'm glad people think differently than me."

But that you pivot on exactly the same point -- I take it as cue to share.)

"In the last moments of my life, I know the only thing that will have any meaning and that will fill my mind and heart is the people I loved and those who loved me in return."

I find that this perspective is authentically shared by many women (though there are clear and notable exceptions;)  My finding is that men (including myself) are generally more mission oriented -- perhaps one explanation for why it is that boys & men were associated with "the golden key."

For myself, laboring for the mission embedded within the human heart is most important, and that mission is not only to love thy neighbor as yourself.

From the Golden Key:

"I am never allowed to keep my children long. You need not go with him except you please, but you must go some day; and I should like you to go with him, for he has the golden key. No girl need be afraid to go with a youth that has the golden key. You will take care of her, Mossy, will you not?

"That I will,” said Mossy.

And Tangle cast a glance at him, and thought she should like to go with him.

"And,” said the lady, “If you should lose each other as you go through the—the—I never can remember the name of that country,—do not be afraid, but go on and on.”

She kissed Tangle on the mouth and Mossy on the forehead, led them to the door, and waved her hand eastward. Mossy and Tangle took each other’s hand and walked away into the depth of the forest. In his right hand Mossy held the golden key.

Isn't it interesting

Isn't it interesting that we are discussing this article about talking face to face on the internet? Can anyone taste the irony? I really enjoyed this article.

Well, let's understand this.

What I'm suggesting is that there's a reason we're talking over the Internet, rather than in person, and that the reason is a sense of mission.

Unless the person to your left is interested in shamanism, 2012, and the other things we talk about here, in which case, by all means, turn off your browser.

I'm not saying "this is where we want to remain;"  I am not justifying the present.  I am saying that it is worthwhile to think about how things got to be the way they are, if we want to change them.

This is a good point.

It actually hits onto one of the things about pre-internet societies that most people either dance around or ignore altogether and that is this.

Most people that are local to each other are interested in different things and have a hard time getting along.

 I would even go so far as to say that this is one of the closest things to a universal truth I've ever seen and dovetails into what you are saying pretty well.

Unless you are dealing with a population of scale(like San Francisco or New York City, for example) chances are that your neighbors aren't interested in the molecular structure of DMT, Terrence McKenna, shamanism, or 2012 and if you ask them you will get irritation at best and suspicion at worst.

I've always thought of humans as being social as opposed to hive or pack animals. There is a subtle but very importance different. We need interaction in some sense, but in many cases are uncomfortable once we get it.

 

Unfortunately the only way I've thought of so far to deal with this is either total sublimation into dogma or being forced to deal with it(which is what happened in pre-internet societies). 

 

C23

Would he were fatter! But I fear him not:
Yet if my name were liable to fear, 
 I do not know the man I should avoid
So soon as that spare Cassius. He reads much;
He is a great observer

Interesting article. One question, though.

..How is one supposed to *create* these sorts of relationships, which are apparently the "pearl of great price?"

I'm not trying to be snarky here (...well, not terribly). It's just that, if you are going to define a social institution and explain (quite convincingly, I might add) why it is perhaps *the* most important thing out there, more so than money or just about anything else, you might want to add some non-vague, practical instructions for how one goes about entering into it.

From my experience, it's always been much easier for me to have close, rewarding friendships with people of both sexes than it has been for me to enter into any kind of intimate sexual relationship... and the ones I *have* entered into were never terribly fulfilling. At this point, I honestly put whether one has attained that sort of connection with another person down to chance/fate; while there certainly is a lot one can do to work on oneself and improve one's character, that does not necessarily affect whether or not one will actually *meet* another person who s/he can feel comfortable sharing intimacy with. Thus, judging a person's wealth and health by whether or not a healthy romantic/sexual relationship is in their life as an extremely shallow venture, almost as shallow as the old economic system you seem to be railing against.

I would bring up the (mostly) celibate monks from both Christian and Buddhist traditions, most of our great philosophers, poets, and scientists, and other people who lead celibate lives which were very productive and did much to benefit mankind and, indeed, the world, but I feel as though I've already made my rhetorical point. Sorry if this sounds angry and overly-critical - I liked much of the article and agreed with many of its points - I just felt compelled to throw in this one criticism, since it seems pertinent.

99% frustration, 1% inspiration

Fantastic article! This has certainly helped shed some light on why social networking web sites have left me feeling frustrated (to say the least!) with the kind of apathetic friendships they inspire.

Fed up of limp (pun intended) "pokes" and one-liner correspondence, I decided to write a book of letters directed at the individuals on my friends list --some 250+ former colleagues, lovers, family members and complete strangers-- describing (with brutal honesty) the capacity in which I know, knew, or (in many cases) <i>don't</i> know them.

What has been interesting about the exercise is the amount of support the people in question were prepared to give! On its completion, I invited everyone on my friends list to join the group 'You Are In This Book' which provided the relevant link to the print/download page on Lulu, and implored them to boycott Facebook. Less than a third of those invited joined the group, of which maybe less than a third bothered to get the book. Yet, on deleting my account two weeks later, I was inundated with messages from people asking: "Omg! Why did you delete me? Aren't we friends any more?"

Madness! My book's conclusion states simply, "Meet up. Talk. Embrace. Grab a hold of something real." I feel it echoes the sentiment of this article perfectly. Thanks Wendy for writing it with such honesty and depth, and I hope you'll forgive me for adding this rather longwinded description of my own findings!

'Friends Like These...' is available here:
http://stores.lulu.com/boredbrand

I'd love to hear your feedback.

Agreement!

I thought that this was a great article, mostly because I find it to be completely true in my own life on so many levels. I have been with my fiancee for almost six years, and in that time part of our philosophy is to "just do it." Sexuality is a powerful exchange of energy, and one that leaves you feeling blissful and close with your partner. I really believe that sexuality does bring you happiness and is a sustaining activity in a relationship. I think that in shaky times, it is soo important to reinforce that bond between partners. I will say, that even though my fiancee was laid off from his job a year and a half ago, our relationship and our outlook is better than ever. Another thing that has also helped us maintain our sense of happiness are our social interactions. We have a strong and stable group of friends with whom we meet regularly to cook over the fire, sweatlodge, and make music with. I think our strong connections to people breathes lifeforce into our world and it enhances us as both individuals and a couple. We also attend a lot of music concerts, and there is a constant flow of new friends in our lives. While I think that the internet and other electronic means of interactions such as cell phones are convienient, I wholly believe that we need to realize that they are JUST that--convienient and that they aren't real life. I think that children learn these things from their parents. For instance, I didn't get a cell phone until I drove a car--for safety. We didn't have televisions in our bedrooms until we were in highschool, and even then there was no cable, just a tv for watching videos. I think that because I was never encouraged to revel in these products that I have much better sense of self. And I completely agree with the fact that people will say or do things over email and text that they wouldn't face to face--I am completely guilty of this myself, but in a good way, actually. I find it easier to assert myself over text message, when sometimes I would feel intimidated. So I think for me, it's all about knowning yourself, and being able to work things to your own advantage in an appropriate way! :) Loved the piece....peace

hmm

thats why i need to get off the internet and go to a bar

... in an insane culture

I think we can all agree that for many of us it is difficult to meet people who both share our interests and resonate with us on a personal/intimate level in the real world. Some locations are better than others, and I think the epic struggle of the age is finding a place where we feel that we belong, and knowing what our place is. My question is, how does a "sane" person connect and relate in an INSANE society!? In some circumstances withdrawl and isolation is a healthy response, no?

<p>

As a person who is into psychedelics, I am mostly repulsed by alcohol-culture, but that is the game that is being played. And while I am able to find small instances of refuge, I feel that I'm not currently in a social atmosphere that is best for me.

<p>

And as a white man in north america, with regard to relating to the opposite sex/gender, I find it difficult to balance my feminist sensitivities, my admittedly high moral standards, and the degree to which it seems that women have internalized the pervasive abuse and objectification that exists in our culture.