Spiritual Bypassing

The following is excerpted from Spiritual Bypassing: When Spirituality Disconnects Us from What Really Matters, by Robert Augustus Masters, available from North Atlantic Books.
Avoidance in Holy Drag: An Introduction to Spiritual Bypassing
Spiritual bypassing, a term first coined by psychologist John Welwood in 1984, is the use of spiritual practices and beliefs to avoid dealing with our painful feelings, unresolved wounds, and developmental needs. It is much more common than we might think and, in fact, is so pervasive as to go largely unnoticed, except in its more obvious extremes.
Part of the reason for this is that we tend not to have very much tolerance, either personally or collectively, for facing, entering, and working through our pain, strongly preferring pain-numbing "solutions," regardless of how much suffering such "remedies" may catalyze. Because this preference has so deeply and thoroughly infiltrated our culture that it has become all but normalized, spiritual bypassing fits almost seamlessly into our collective habit of turning away from what is painful, as a kind of higher analgesic with seemingly minimal side effects. It is a spiritualized strategy not only for avoiding pain but also for legitimizing such avoidance, in ways ranging from the blatantly obvious to the extremely subtle.
Spiritual bypassing is a very persistent shadow of spirituality, manifesting in many forms, often without being acknowledged as such. Aspects of spiritual bypassing include exaggerated detachment, emotional numbing and repression, overemphasis on the positive, anger-phobia, blind or overly tolerant compassion, weak or too porous boundaries, lopsided development (cognitive intelligence often being far ahead of emotional and moral intelligence), debilitating judgment about one's negativity or shadow side, devaluation of the personal relative to the spiritual, and delusions of having arrived at a higher level of being.
The explosion of interest in spirituality since the mid-1960s, especially Eastern spirituality, has been accompanied by a corresponding interest and immersion in spiritual bypassing -- which has, however, not very often been named, let alone viewed, as such. It has been easier to frame spiritual bypassing as a religion -- transcending, spiritually advanced practice or perspective, especially in the fast-food spirituality epitomized by faddish phenomena like The Secret. Some of the more glaringly facile features, such as drive-through servings of reheated wisdom like "Don't take it personally" or "Whatever bothers you about someone is really only about you" or "It's all just an illusion," are available for consumption and parroting by just about anyone.
Happily, the honeymoon with false or superficial notions of spirituality is starting to wane. Enough bubbles have been burst; enough spiritual teachers, Eastern and Western, have been caught with pants or halo down; enough cults have come and gone; enough time has been spent with spiritual baubles, credentials, energy transmissions, and gurucentrism to sense deeper treasures. But valuable as the desire for a more authentic spirituality is, such change will not occur on any significant scale and really take root until spiritual bypassing is outgrown, and that is not as easy as it might sound, for it asks that we cease turning away from our pain, numbing ourselves, and expecting spirituality to make us feel better.
True spirituality is not a high, not a rush, not an altered state. It has been fine to romance it for a while, but our times call for something far more real, grounded, and responsible; something radically alive and naturally integral; something that shakes us to our very core until we stop treating spiritual deepening as something to dabble in here and there. Authentic spirituality is not some little flicker or buzz of knowingness, not a psychedelic blast-through or a mellow hanging-out on some exalted plane of consciousness, not a bubble of immunity, but a vast fire of liberation, an exquisitely fitting crucible and sanctuary, providing both heat and light for the healing and awakening we need.
Most of the time when we're immersed in spiritual bypassing, we like the light but not the heat. And when we're caught up in the grosser forms of spiritual bypassing, we'd usually much rather theorize about the frontiers of consciousness than actually go there, suppressing the fire rather than breathing it even more alive, espousing the ideal of unconditional love but not permitting love to show up in its more challenging, personal dimensions. To do so would be too hot, too scary, and too out-of-control, bringing things to the surface that we have long disowned or suppressed.
But if we really want the light, we cannot afford to flee the heat. As Victor Frankl said, "What gives light must endure burning." And being with the fire's heat doesn't just mean sitting with the difficult stuff in meditation, but also going into it, trekking to its core, facing and entering and getting intimate with whatever is there, however scary or traumatic or sad or raw.
We have had quite an affair with Eastern spiritual pathways, but now it is time to go deeper. We must do this not only to get more intimate with the essence of these wisdom traditions beyond ritual and belief and dogma but also to make room for the healthy evolution, not just the necessary Westernization, of these traditions so that their presentation ceases encouraging spiritual bypassing (however indirectly) and, in fact, consciously and actively ceases giving it soil to flower. These changes won't happen to any significant degree, however, unless we work in-depth and integratively with our physical, emotional, psychological, spiritual, and social dimensions to generate an everdeeper sense of wholeness, vitality, and basic sanity.
Any spiritual path, Eastern or Western, that does not deal in real depth with psychological issues, and deal with these in more than just spiritual contexts, is setting itself up for an abundance of spiritual bypassing. If there is not sufficient encouragement and support from spiritual teachers and teachings for practitioners to engage in significant depth in psychoemotional work, and if those students who really need such work don't then do it, they'll be left trying to work out their psychoemotional issues, traumatic and otherwise, only through the spiritual practices they have been given, as if doing so is somehow superior to -- or a "higher" activity than -- engaging in quality psychotherapy. Psychotherapy is often viewed as an inferior undertaking relative to spiritual practice, perhaps even something we shouldn't have to do. When our spiritual bypassing is more subtle, the idea of psychotherapy may be considered more acceptable, but we will still shy away from a full-blooded investigation of our core wounds.
Spiritual bypassing is largely occupied, at least in its New Age forms, by the idea of wholeness and the innate unity of Being -- "Oneness" being perhaps its favorite bumper sticker -- but actually generates and reinforces fragmentation by separating out from and rejecting what is painful, distressed, and unhealed; all the far-from-flattering aspects of being human. By consistently keeping these in the dark, "down below" (when we're locked into our headquarters, our body and feelings seem to be below us), they tend to behave badly when let out, much like animals that have spent too long in cages. Our neglect of these aspects of ourselves, however gently framed, is akin to that of otherwise caring parents who leave their children without sufficient food, clothing, or care.
The trappings of spiritual bypassing can look good, particularly when they seem to promise freedom from life's fuss and fury, but this supposed serenity and detachment is often little more than metaphysical valium, especially for those who have made too much of a virtue out of being and looking positive.
A common telltale sign of spiritual bypassing is a lack of grounding and in-the-body experience that tends to keep us either spacily afloat in how we relate to the world or too rigidly tethered to a spiritual system that seemingly provides the solidity we lack. We also may fall into premature forgiveness and emotional dissociation, and confuse anger with aggression and ill will, which leaves us disempowered, riddled with weak boundaries. The overdone niceness that often characterizes spiritual bypassing strands it from emotional depth and authenticity; and its underlying grief -- mostly unspoken, untouched, unacknowledged -- keeps it marooned from the very caring that would unwrap and undo it, like a baby being readied for a bath by a loving parent.
Spiritual bypassing distances us not only from our pain and difficult personal issues but also from our own authentic spirituality, stranding us in a metaphysical limbo, a zone of exaggerated gentleness, niceness, and superficiality. Its frequently disconnected nature keeps it adrift, clinging to the life jacket of its self-conferred spiritual credentials. As such, it maroons us from embodying our full humanity.
But let us not be too hard on spiritual bypassing, for every one of us who has entered into the spiritual has engaged in spiritual bypassing, at least to some degree, having for years used other means to make ourselves feel better or more secure. Why would we not also approach spirituality, particularly at first, with much the same expectation that it make us feel better or more secure in various areas of our life?
To truly outgrow spiritual bypassing -- which in part means releasing spirituality (and everything else!) from the obligation to make us feel better or more secure or more whole -- we must not only see it for what it is and cease engaging in it but also view it with genuine compassion, however fiery that might be or need to be. The spiritual bypasser in us needs not censure nor shaming but rather to be consciously and caringly included in our awareness without being allowed to run the show. Becoming intimate with our own capacity for spiritual bypassing allows us to keep it in healthy perspective.
I have worked with many clients who described themselves as being on a spiritual path, particularly as meditators. Most were preoccupied, at least initially, with being nice, trying to be positive and nonjudgmental, while impaling themselves on various spiritual "shoulds," such as "I should not show anger" or "I should be more loving" or "I should be more open after all the time I've put into my spiritual practice." Fleeing their darker (or "less spiritual") emotions, impulses, and intentions, they had, to varying degrees, trapped themselves within the very practices and beliefs that they had hoped might liberate them, or at least make them feel better.
Even the most exquisitely designed spiritual methodologies can become traps, leading not to freedom but only to reinforcement, however subtle, of the "I" that wants to be a somebody who has attained or realized freedom (the very same "I" that doesn't realize there are no Oscars for awakening). The most obvious potential traps-in-waiting include the belief that we should rise above our difficulties and simply embrace Oneness, even as the tendency to divide everything into positive and negative, higher and lower, spiritual and nonspiritual, runs wild in us. Subtler traps-in-waiting, less densely populated with metaphysical lullabies and ascension metaphors, and cloaked in the appearance of discernment, teach non-aversion through cultivating a capacity for dispassionate witnessing and/or various devotional rituals. Subtler still are those that emphasize meeting everything with acceptance and compassion. Each approach has its own value, if only to eventually propel us into an even deeper direction, and each is far from immune to being possessed by spiritual bypassing, especially when we are still hoping, whatever our depth of spiritual practice, to reach a state of immunity to suffering (both personally and collectively).
As my spiritually inclined clients become more intimate with their pain and difficulties, coming to understand the origins of their troubles with a more open ear and heart, they either abandon their misguided spiritual practices and reenter a more fitting version of them with less submissiveness and more integrity and creativity or find new practices that better suit their needs, coming to recognize more deeply that everything-everything!-can serve their healing and awakening.
If we can outgrow spiritual bypassing, we might enter a deeper life-a life of full-blooded integrity, depth, love, and sanity; a life of authenticity on every level; a life in which the personal, interpersonal, and transpersonal are all honored and lived to the fullest.
May what I have written serve you well.
Copyright © 2010 by Robert Masters. Reprinted by permission of publisher.
Teaser image by leolintang, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet- 12-20-10
- Robert Augustus Masters's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version









Comments
I love this kind of article
Where there's spirituality, there's spiritual bypassing
the can of wormholes
Dive in...
ha!
No Oscars for awakening
aha
right, no Oscars because hollywood is not in the awakening business,
conversly when hollywood becomes awakened then the meaning of the Oscar
would reflect that.
I spent a year in a spiritual community back in the 70's I became the whiping boy for the group
because I was not cleaning the temple steps enough metaphoricaly speaking, although I did a lot of work
for them, they were beginning a practice that was outlined in the book the leader of the
community wrote called Nuclear Evolution, it was based on the I Ching which was a
very novel idea, however when the group began doing the practice called "creative conflict"
it fast became a group dynamic that ended up favoring the people that were more into
rising in the group, in other words they were going for the metaphorical Oscar or the
position of importance in the leader's eye.This is just one example, and I'm not sayingthat I was
meant to stay in this group, I just was a person that they got to try out
their new creative conflict on, a kind of test dummy, they had what they called the "hot seat
where they all could tare you down, as far as their new found understanding of the rules of the
game worked.I liked the idea of a world that would recycle their leaders according to the I Ching
but I am not sure that the I ching was ever ment to be used that way, if you see what I'm attempting to describe in a few sentences.
If i went into more detail, on how this " creative conflict" worked and the "hot seat" it could be interesting to compare techniques in other groups and also psychology, yet I am wondering
on just how all this has evolved over the years since say the sixties, I mean who are the heavy
hitters in the world of psychology, no Jung anymore no Freud, and really just how has their
thought been holding up, and become jelled or fixed, which is why I liked reading about
William James, because all this stuff was just emerging in his day.
"and now your Tv set will return you to normal programming"
"Everyone wants to be happy." Right. So?
This article should be read by all followers of any religion (other than the irremediably childhood-indoctrinated), but especially by all followers of those Buddhist teachers who begin their teachings by saying "Everyone wants to be happy" (who can deny this platitude?) and then go on to suggest the Buddhist path as a way to attain "happiness", a.k.a. "freedom from suffering". All you have to do is to spend the rest of your life following their teachings (no working through unresolved psychological conflicts needed). And, of course, the greater your financial contributions (or the amount of work you put into "spreading the Dharma") the greater your stock of "merit" will become, and thus the fewer the number of rebirths required before you attain "Enlightenment". But in fact no "guru" is needed, still less "guru devotion". The best teacher is experience, combined with reflecting upon it to understand what it teaches you. Therefore, seek experience, the more uncommon the better.
Those interested in reading my views of the major religions may find them here.
Non-situational happiness
Thanks for this, Peter! It is so very easy to get overly dependent on a particular path...
Only when we release everything — everything! — from the obligation to make us feel better do we find authentic happiness.
RE Peter Meyer's post.
I think you nicely summed up a range of the dead ends that people can go down if they follow the Buddhist path blindly.
However one of the advantages of the Buddhist path as I see it is that I have people of similar inclination and personality type with whom to argue. So long as you take it as a path of using your intelligence and developing wisdom rather than downloading it ( as we were encouraged to do by the Buddha) it works very well.
Well said
Letting go of trying to get rid of all suffering
Spot on
No more turning away
Nice introduction to your book
…And especially the author's attentive responses to comments.
I recently had a "spiritual" type of experience that prompted me to reconsider my attachment to the practice of Belief itself. At this moment (a couple of months into my reassessment of my own personal beliefs) I've rejected all of them, save one: I believe that I am more than just this physical body.
All other storage placements for previously accepted thoughts have had their strong ties of Faith cut, their boxes overturned, and their contents spilled out for reexamination. In each individual case (so far) the belief has undergone an autopsy of sorts—an examination of each constituent thought, how they had worked together, and why they no longer do.
It’s been difficult to excavate such a foundational mental construct, but I think it’s essential in order for me to discover who I am.
After this initial reexamination I’ve concluded that belief in almost anything is nothing more than a symptom of the natural laziness of the human mind.
On a larger scale, I've come to understand how strong beliefs can be inserted into a mentally lazy individual by the consensus belief of a society, a political regime, a religion, a terrorist organization, a law enforcement agency, a street gang, etc… which when it amasses into a Belief System develops a life of its own. Such a Belief System has the ability to stifle the thinking process of millions of people in a given society for thousands of years; way past whatever useful functionality it once may have had.
The current rapid pace of the replacement of a previously accepted fact with new ones, along with the accelerated evolution of our consciousness, is in opposition to the very concept of Belief. Where once-upon-a-time when the pace of life was slow, and a fact or a group of facts could be assembled into a Belief, tied with a pretty bow of Faith, and assembled into a Belief System that could survive generations of reexamination and help to stabilize a society—such a form of mental laziness will no longer help us to find comfort in our worsening situation.
The persistence of Belief Systems may be a significant factor contributing to the polarization of societies today, and may even be a cause for the extinction of humanity itself. Therefore, although I consider it an impossibility, I think it behooves us all to reconsider the lazy mental practice of Belief in particular, and the effects of Belief Systems in general—no matter their perceived psychological, physical, or spiritual value.
There is a need greater than the need to decide what to believe. It is the need to resist the desire to believe. We need, instead, to continuously and relentlessly THINK!
Beyond belief
Rare Items Indeed
Medicine ceremony
I started taking part in a
Very timely, much needed article.
Moving beyond blind compassion
CinG, it sure sounds like you're ready to embrace a deeper, more authentic wholeness, in which you honor your boundaries to such a degree that you cease tolerating bad treatment from others. In blind compassion we make a virtue out of not confronting others, as if doing so is somehow spiritual. But in real compassion, we don't shy away from confronting those who are abusing us, however fierce our stand may be or may need to be.
Yes, go toward and into your pain, and go at a pace that allows for proper digestion and integration. Ideally, you'd do this under the guidance of a suitably skilled therapist...
Thanks Robert.
Archetypal Awareness
Psychospiritual healing, awakening, and integration
Archetypal Awareness
First of all, I am saying
Too Much Thinking Flattens Us
Lightsound, I suggest you read the whole post, letting yourself not just think about it, but also feel it and its implications.
The capacity to hold multiple perspectives does not necessarily mean that we hold all perspectives as equivalent, anymore than we cease looking morally upon various actions...
I suggest you learn to embody a perspective through which you can observe your mind at work (including whatever it might be saying about these very words of mine).
Spirituality, and a Deeper Spirituality
Thanks for this, Howard16!
I can tell you've done plenty of time in spiritual bootcamp. Some of what I address in the piece you read mainly concerns New Age spirituality and its over-emphasis on being positive. Spiritual bypassing, of course, can get very subtle, infecting even advanced practitioners of, say, Buddhism.
I appreciate and understand what you say about your est experience. The most highly effective psychospiritual work rarely comes from prolonged psychotherapy; I myself have often seen deep breakthroughs happen in a short time, in a couple of individual sessions or in intensive groupwork. Great psychotherapy is as efficient as it is effective, without any of the cultish side-effects that more often than not were part of est...
I hope you and your wife will consider reading my book; much of what you address is covered there.
Spiritual Bypassing
I like this idea very much. It is a good tool to assist in taking stock of our spiritual development. It is hard to stay true to spiritual development when life is making demands and tempting us down an easier path. It is easy to lean on whatever props us up or makes life run more smoothly. So, occasionally checking ourselves for Spiritual Bypassing sounds like a good thing.
Yet, I also found wildthing's probings to be of value. Although Wildthing didn't get a good grade on "the test," and is obviously not the teacher's favorite. But, since that might be construed as Spiritual Bypassing, none of us should be trying to achieve that anyway. hmmmmmmmmm
There's a spiritual bypasser in all of us
Bypassing, spirituality,psychotherapy and neuroplasticity
Firstly I think that the comment re spiritual bypassing and the risks of dissociation and premature forgiveness are very true and relevant. I have however, reservations about the approach of traditional psychotherapy.
The principals of neuroplasticity would suggest that in spending considerable time going over old painful experiences we are actually helping hardwire in the habit of thinking about them- so insight based therapies may have some traps involved. THis clearly would be a problem with less skilled therapists- but finding a good therpaist is not easy and can be very much hit and miss. Then there is the issue of the time and expense involved in such therapies and the limited number of qualified practitioners.
My own experience is that I was recently trained in a technique called Mindfulness Integrated CBT. The technique takes about 8-10 weeks and requires 2 sessions of 1/2 hour mindfulness training as home work and weekly reviews with a clinician. It focuses on firstly training in breath mindfulness then shifting to body scanning- examining the perceived somatosensory sensations in minute detail. After several weeks one's sensory acuity increases quite radically. When this stage is reached one imagines threatening or stressful events then closely observes the body sensations involved with being angry being afraid or whatever. In doing a very focussed intent examination of the sensations, inevitably the sensations die down. With a little refinement this technique is developed into a very stabilising capacity to master emotional stress on the fly. It leads to much greater calm and confidence on the part of the practitioner. What is particularly interesting though is that as ones practice deepens- old memories surface but are re-experienced but this time in the context of profound relaxation, and a commitment not to follow or elaborate on the thought. My own experience was that I became aware of a remarkable number of subtle transferences that had been going on in my life and extinguished them virtually as they arose. Patients who have done the technique have found similar results. The MiCBT technique is focused around the idea of using neuroplasticity to train in equanimity compassion the capacity to focus attention at will and metacognition. Again my own experience was that this flowed directly into my establishing a regular meditation practice. I had been struggling to get that off the ground for about 20 years. The technique is proving quick, safe effective, and much less resource costly than traditional psychotherapy.
I do agree though that Spiritual bypassing is one of the core traps we should be aware of. The idea is relevant to anyone who is embarked on a spiritual path. In fact it is one of the hazardswarned of in Buddhist practice. ( I am now involved in a Tibetan Buddhist group).
There have been other mentions made of New Age Spirituality, and I do think one of the traps in tha path is the relative isolation of practitioners. I find myself in a position where my practices is supported by my fellow practitioners and our Rinpoche and have chosen my path because of the support of the group and the experienced and well grounded leader.
It is probably quite appropriate here to think of the role of the psychotherapist as being analagous to the master - student relationship in traditional Buddhist practice.
Barliman, I agree with your
Barliman, I agree with your reservations regarding traditional psychotherapy.
The MiCBT technique you describe is the sort of practice that needs to be incorporated in psychotherapeutic work. Becoming intimate with all that we are requires the establishing of a suitable container for such necessarily deep work...
Thanks for this~
Toward an Asana of Radical Wholeness
Redrae, yes, an authentic spirituality asks that our entire self be brought to the mat. An asana of radical wholeness...
And yes, feel free to promote my excerpt, along with my links, on your site.
Robert
i may have bypassed
Well written
-JoshWaycaster
This Explains it...!
Of all the millions of
Of all the millions of websites available I could have read this morning, I found this gem. Wonderful! For the past few years my friends have been telling me I am spiritually advanced. I would scoff and say "No, this is not true". I pictured my ego sitting high on a throne looking out on all the other desperate people struggling, longing 'to advance' with a wry smile on my face. I haven't heard the phrase spiritual bypassing before, and it makes so much sense. I was there in the foxholes of muck and ugly fighting for my life, fully risking embarrassment I jumped in head first, feet first, sobbing and wailing, all to rid myself of whom I was not. I read self help books, had appointments with sriritual counselors, meditated until I couldn't breathe anymore. It was all neccesary(for me). Then. I currently am following a zen-like existance as this is what I do for a living, however, I cannot fully give myself over to this eastern philosophy as this will surely take me away from me. I work on people from all walks of life, and if my mind is so centered on someone else's philosophy or training, I couldn't begin to understand or learn anything else. There are so many posible paths and lovely choices, free will is a beautiful thing. I relish every painful memory that comes into my mind, ALMOST every life challenge excites me. However, sometimes I need a break and I read and meditate with the froo-froo. It's like a reality bubble bath and when I'm done I go back to work figuring out what dimension is real.
I have read all the comments