Spiritual Bypassing

bluesakybigbluesky.jpg

 

The following is excerpted from Spiritual Bypassing: When Spirituality Disconnects Us from What Really Matters, by Robert Augustus Masters, available from North Atlantic Books.

 

Avoidance in Holy Drag: An Introduction to Spiritual Bypassing

Spiritual bypassing, a term first coined by psychologist John Welwood in 1984, is the use of spiritual practices and beliefs to avoid dealing with our painful feelings, unresolved wounds, and developmental needs. It is much more common than we might think and, in fact, is so pervasive as to go largely unnoticed, except in its more obvious extremes.

Part of the reason for this is that we tend not to have very much tolerance, either personally or collectively, for facing, entering, and working through our pain, strongly preferring pain-numbing "solutions," regardless of how much suffering such "remedies" may catalyze. Because this preference has so deeply and thoroughly infiltrated our culture that it has become all but normalized, spiritual bypassing fits almost seamlessly into our collective habit of turning away from what is painful, as a kind of higher analgesic with seemingly minimal side effects. It is a spiritualized strategy not only for avoiding pain but also for legitimizing such avoidance, in ways ranging from the blatantly obvious to the extremely subtle.

Spiritual bypassing is a very persistent shadow of spirituality, manifesting in many forms, often without being acknowledged as such. Aspects of spiritual bypassing include exaggerated detachment, emotional numbing and repression, overemphasis on the positive, anger-phobia, blind or overly tolerant compassion, weak or too porous boundaries, lopsided development (cognitive intelligence often being far ahead of emotional and moral intelligence), debilitating judgment about one's negativity or shadow side, devaluation of the personal relative to the spiritual, and delusions of having arrived at a higher level of being.

The explosion of interest in spirituality since the mid-1960s, especially Eastern spirituality, has been accompanied by a corresponding interest and immersion in spiritual bypassing -- which has, however, not very often been named, let alone viewed, as such. It has been easier to frame spiritual bypassing as a religion -- transcending, spiritually advanced practice or perspective, especially in the fast-food spirituality epitomized by faddish phenomena like The Secret. Some of the more glaringly facile features, such as drive-through servings of reheated wisdom like "Don't take it personally" or "Whatever bothers you about someone is really only about you" or "It's all just an illusion," are available for consumption and parroting by just about anyone.

Happily, the honeymoon with false or superficial notions of spirituality is starting to wane. Enough bubbles have been burst; enough spiritual teachers, Eastern and Western, have been caught with pants or halo down; enough cults have come and gone; enough time has been spent with spiritual baubles, credentials, energy transmissions, and gurucentrism to sense deeper treasures. But valuable as the desire for a more authentic spirituality is, such change will not occur on any significant scale and really take root until spiritual bypassing is outgrown, and that is not as easy as it might sound, for it asks that we cease turning away from our pain, numbing ourselves, and expecting spirituality to make us feel better.

True spirituality is not a high, not a rush, not an altered state. It has been fine to romance it for a while, but our times call for something far more real, grounded, and responsible; something radically alive and naturally integral; something that shakes us to our very core until we stop treating spiritual deepening as something to dabble in here and there. Authentic spirituality is not some little flicker or buzz of knowingness, not a psychedelic blast-through or a mellow hanging-out on some exalted plane of consciousness, not a bubble of immunity, but a vast fire of liberation, an exquisitely fitting crucible and sanctuary, providing both heat and light for the healing and awakening we need.

Most of the time when we're immersed in spiritual bypassing, we like the light but not the heat. And when we're caught up in the grosser forms of spiritual bypassing, we'd usually much rather theorize about the frontiers of consciousness than actually go there, suppressing the fire rather than breathing it even more alive, espousing the ideal of unconditional love but not permitting love to show up in its more challenging, personal dimensions. To do so would be too hot, too scary, and too out-of-control, bringing things to the surface that we have long disowned or suppressed.

But if we really want the light, we cannot afford to flee the heat. As Victor Frankl said, "What gives light must endure burning." And being with the fire's heat doesn't just mean sitting with the difficult stuff in meditation, but also going into it, trekking to its core, facing and entering and getting intimate with whatever is there, however scary or traumatic or sad or raw.

We have had quite an affair with Eastern spiritual pathways, but now it is time to go deeper. We must do this not only to get more intimate with the essence of these wisdom traditions beyond ritual and belief and dogma but also to make room for the healthy evolution, not just the necessary Westernization, of these traditions so that their presentation ceases encouraging spiritual bypassing (however indirectly) and, in fact, consciously and actively ceases giving it soil to flower. These changes won't happen to any significant degree, however, unless we work in-depth and integratively with our physical, emotional, psychological, spiritual, and social dimensions to generate an everdeeper sense of wholeness, vitality, and basic sanity.

Any spiritual path, Eastern or Western, that does not deal in real depth with psychological issues, and deal with these in more than just spiritual contexts, is setting itself up for an abundance of spiritual bypassing. If there is not sufficient encouragement and support from spiritual teachers and teachings for practitioners to engage in significant depth in psychoemotional work, and if those students who really need such work don't then do it, they'll be left trying to work out their psychoemotional issues, traumatic and otherwise, only through the spiritual practices they have been given, as if doing so is somehow superior to -- or a "higher" activity than -- engaging in quality psychotherapy. Psychotherapy is often viewed as an inferior undertaking relative to spiritual practice, perhaps even something we shouldn't have to do. When our spiritual bypassing is more subtle, the idea of psychotherapy may be considered more acceptable, but we will still shy away from a full-blooded investigation of our core wounds.

Spiritual bypassing is largely occupied, at least in its New Age forms, by the idea of wholeness and the innate unity of Being -- "Oneness" being perhaps its favorite bumper sticker -- but actually generates and reinforces fragmentation by separating out from and rejecting what is painful, distressed, and unhealed; all the far-from-flattering aspects of being human. By consistently keeping these in the dark, "down below" (when we're locked into our headquarters, our body and feelings seem to be below us), they tend to behave badly when let out, much like animals that have spent too long in cages. Our neglect of these aspects of ourselves, however gently framed, is akin to that of otherwise caring parents who leave their children without sufficient food, clothing, or care.

The trappings of spiritual bypassing can look good, particularly when they seem to promise freedom from life's fuss and fury, but this supposed serenity and detachment is often little more than metaphysical valium, especially for those who have made too much of a virtue out of being and looking positive.

A common telltale sign of spiritual bypassing is a lack of grounding and in-the-body experience that tends to keep us either spacily afloat in how we relate to the world or too rigidly tethered to a spiritual system that seemingly provides the solidity we lack. We also may fall into premature forgiveness and emotional dissociation, and confuse anger with aggression and ill will, which leaves us disempowered, riddled with weak boundaries. The overdone niceness that often characterizes spiritual bypassing strands it from emotional depth and authenticity; and its underlying grief -- mostly unspoken, untouched, unacknowledged -- keeps it marooned from the very caring that would unwrap and undo it, like a baby being readied for a bath by a loving parent.

Spiritual bypassing distances us not only from our pain and difficult personal issues but also from our own authentic spirituality, stranding us in a metaphysical limbo, a zone of exaggerated gentleness, niceness, and superficiality. Its frequently disconnected nature keeps it adrift, clinging to the life jacket of its self-conferred spiritual credentials. As such, it maroons us from embodying our full humanity.

But let us not be too hard on spiritual bypassing, for every one of us who has entered into the spiritual has engaged in spiritual bypassing, at least to some degree, having for years used other means to make ourselves feel better or more secure. Why would we not also approach spirituality, particularly at first, with much the same expectation that it make us feel better or more secure in various areas of our life?

To truly outgrow spiritual bypassing -- which in part means releasing spirituality (and everything else!) from the obligation to make us feel better or more secure or more whole -- we must not only see it for what it is and cease engaging in it but also view it with genuine compassion, however fiery that might be or need to be. The spiritual bypasser in us needs not censure nor shaming but rather to be consciously and caringly included in our awareness without being allowed to run the show. Becoming intimate with our own capacity for spiritual bypassing allows us to keep it in healthy perspective.

I have worked with many clients who described themselves as being on a spiritual path, particularly as meditators. Most were preoccupied, at least initially, with being nice, trying to be positive and nonjudgmental, while impaling themselves on various spiritual "shoulds," such as "I should not show anger" or "I should be more loving" or "I should be more open after all the time I've put into my spiritual practice." Fleeing their darker (or "less spiritual") emotions, impulses, and intentions, they had, to varying degrees, trapped themselves within the very practices and beliefs that they had hoped might liberate them, or at least make them feel better.

 

Even the most exquisitely designed spiritual methodologies can become traps, leading not to freedom but only to reinforcement, however subtle, of the "I" that wants to be a somebody who has attained or realized freedom (the very same "I" that doesn't realize there are no Oscars for awakening). The most obvious potential traps-in-waiting include the belief that we should rise above our difficulties and simply embrace Oneness, even as the tendency to divide everything into positive and negative, higher and lower, spiritual and nonspiritual, runs wild in us. Subtler traps-in-waiting, less densely populated with metaphysical lullabies and ascension metaphors, and cloaked in the appearance of discernment, teach non-aversion through cultivating a capacity for dispassionate witnessing and/or various devotional rituals. Subtler still are those that emphasize meeting everything with acceptance and compassion. Each approach has its own value, if only to eventually propel us into an even deeper direction, and each is far from immune to being possessed by spiritual bypassing, especially when we are still hoping, whatever our depth of spiritual practice, to reach a state of immunity to suffering (both personally and collectively).

As my spiritually inclined clients become more intimate with their pain and difficulties, coming to understand the origins of their troubles with a more open ear and heart, they either abandon their misguided spiritual practices and reenter a more fitting version of them with less submissiveness and more integrity and creativity or find new practices that better suit their needs, coming to recognize more deeply that everything-everything!-can serve their healing and awakening.

If we can outgrow spiritual bypassing, we might enter a deeper life-a life of full-blooded integrity, depth, love, and sanity; a life of authenticity on every level; a life in which the personal, interpersonal, and transpersonal are all honored and lived to the fullest.

May what I have written serve you well.

 

Copyright © 2010 by Robert Masters. Reprinted by permission of publisher.

 

 

 

Teaser image by leolintang, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

I love this kind of article

It's the essence of the issues behind why people don't evolve. There's the ignorant and there's the informed. In both cases, there's a lacking of growth. For the informed who have a conscious or unconscious penchant for looking down on the ignorant (myself included), this kind of article is a good way of breaking through that sense of superiority and stoke the fires of some true compassion. Just because those of us who have had the courage to engage in true self growth have developed in some small way, doesn't mean we're still not prone to the same behaviour patterns and thoughts that keep us stuck.

Where there's spirituality, there's spiritual bypassing

I agree, sticksman... Every one of us, spiritual teachers included, is prone to spiritual bypassing. So becoming as intimate as possible with our own tendencies to distract ourselves from our suffering is needed if we are to truly evolve.

the can of wormholes

the key elements here, about the bypass, ok this is just a introduction to the book.Not having read the book one would be more hard put to zero in on the premise.Not having a degree in psychology, or having spent that much time following any particular spiritual path, also leaves something to be desired, as far as having anything relevant to this topic to offer in depth.Having said that I will make some off cuff remarks, because this is an issue that is a little like a red herring at the hungry cat convention.I also needs to be not bypassed or under passed, or over passed, not that I am any authority or other wise high new age holier roller.It just brings up a lot of food for thought, even if my plate is already a smorgasbord of strange delights and other tasty tidbits.But seriously, this really does open the proverbial can of worms.How does psychology check in with history? How does it deal with mass psychology? How does it put a wedge between religion and politics? Do we go for the most glaring problems first, or do we begin by peeling back layer after layer? so I see the words "spiritual bypass" but there is a odd lack here of the word religious bypass.Or is it just taken for granted that these mean the same thing? And then this brings up the whole psychological edifice, the good the bad and the just plane pathological.the word bypass sounds like denial, what was that quote by Mark Twain? "Denial ain't just a river in Egypt" and he wasn't just whistling old man river.I rather think that if psychology has caught up with shall we say two thousand years plus of denial.then just then perhaps this mummy can be unwound.Is there some problem with the famous Ram Dass phrase, Be Here Now? has it morphed to, Be here now or then? or to Be Love Now? And then there are the conundrums of Freud and Jung.When does east meet west? Has the twain been met? never? Are we just talking simple problems, or are they more complex then ever? I am not even attempting to offer an opinion, I never had that luxury.Do I agree with the above comment about "The Secret" well like I said I never had that luxury.And that is just the tip of the witches cold tit.Oh and speaking of witches, and pain and the denial of the feminine and wisdom, and nature, healing arts ect. And moving right along, has the Bible been declared clinically insane? Has the Rig Veda undergone psychoanalysis? Has Harry Heller been made a saint? Or Harry Potter been properly potted? Oh, am I being too cheek a cheek? Ok that was a reference to Donovan, the famous sixties musician, who sung about Atlantis and Season of the Witch, "you got to pick up every stitch" I think we got to do triage on the the stitch job on this Frankenstein monster called western civilization.Okay I have to go do some chanting now.It's Sargent Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band...."I'm fixing a hole where the rain gets in and stops my mind from wandering"

Dive in...

Wildthing, I recommend that you read the whole book.

ha!

another bypass? or pass by.I don't think I am the one to read yet another plea for the psychology of spirituality I did rather like James Hillman's "soul making" though.If people think that being on the spiritual path is like getting an Oscar, (how did hollywad get into this discussion?) then I ask who shrinks the shrinks and who guru's the guru? I mean If I read your book, how many more books do I need to grok what your quest to make sure for instance that the young person that spent a few years in some "New Age" spiritual group or some reject of some such scene doesn't get the Oscar, or at lest the part? No really, quite frankly I think you have your finger on the pulse of the problem, but I wonder where the bypass surgery begins and the Oscar becomes enlightened? Oh, but thanks for trying to save my pass by.Good head hunting, and Peace & Love.

No Oscars for awakening

There are no Oscars for awakening.

aha

right, no Oscars because hollywood is not in the awakening business,

conversly when hollywood becomes awakened then the meaning of the Oscar

would reflect that.

I spent a year in a spiritual community back in the 70's I became the whiping boy for the group

because I was not cleaning the temple steps enough metaphoricaly speaking, although I did a lot of work

for them, they were beginning a practice that was outlined in the book the leader of the

community wrote called Nuclear Evolution, it was based on the I Ching which was a 

very novel idea, however when the group began doing the practice called "creative conflict"

it fast became a group dynamic that ended up favoring the people that were more into

rising in the group, in other words they were going for the metaphorical Oscar or the

position of importance in the leader's eye.This is just one example, and I'm not sayingthat I was

 meant to stay in this group, I just was a person that they got to try out

their new creative conflict on, a kind of test dummy, they had what they called the "hot seat

where they all could tare you down, as far as their new found understanding of the rules of the 

 game worked.I liked the idea of a world that would recycle their leaders according to the I Ching

but I am not sure that the I ching was ever ment to be used that way, if you see what I'm attempting to describe in a few sentences.

If i went into more detail, on how this " creative conflict" worked and the "hot seat" it could be interesting to compare techniques in other groups and also psychology, yet I am wondering

 on just how all this has evolved over the years since say the sixties, I mean who are the heavy

hitters in the world of psychology, no Jung anymore no Freud, and really just how has their

thought been holding up, and become jelled or fixed, which is why I liked reading about

William James, because all this stuff was just emerging in his day.

"and now your Tv set will return you to normal programming"

 

"Everyone wants to be happy." Right. So?

This article should be read by all followers of any religion (other than the irremediably childhood-indoctrinated), but especially by all followers of those Buddhist teachers who begin their teachings by saying "Everyone wants to be happy" (who can deny this platitude?) and then go on to suggest the Buddhist path as a way to attain "happiness", a.k.a. "freedom from suffering". All you have to do is to spend the rest of your life following their teachings (no working through unresolved psychological conflicts needed). And, of course, the greater your financial contributions (or the amount of work you put into "spreading the Dharma") the greater your stock of "merit" will become, and thus the fewer the number of rebirths required before you attain "Enlightenment". But in fact no "guru" is needed, still less "guru devotion". The best teacher is experience, combined with reflecting upon it to understand what it teaches you. Therefore, seek experience, the more uncommon the better.

Those interested in reading my views of the major religions may find them here.

Non-situational happiness

Thanks for this, Peter! It is so very easy to get overly dependent on a particular path...

 

Only when we release everything everything! from the obligation to make us feel better do we find authentic happiness.

RE Peter Meyer's post.

I think you nicely summed up a range of the dead ends that people can go down if they follow the Buddhist path blindly.

However one of the advantages of the Buddhist path as I see it is that I have people of similar inclination and personality type with whom to argue.  So long as you take it as a path of using your intelligence and developing wisdom rather than downloading it ( as we were encouraged to do by the Buddha) it works very well.

Well said

Robert, What you said is something I have been contemplating myself alot lately and I agree with you very much. I myself started practicing zen meditation some years ago with the underlying desperation to get rid of all suffering. Then a few years ago I began doing work on early childhood wounds(even thought at first I was convinced I had none from my very "functional" family) and have begun healing from the trauma of my youth. I still practice meditation, but I believe in a much more "non-bypassing" way. Thanks for the sharing of your wisdom. Warm Regards, David

Letting go of trying to get rid of all suffering

David, so many paths suffer from unaddressed spiritual ambition! It's a major step when we shift from trying to get rid of what troubles us to becoming intimate with it. This is the point when we begin ceasing to use our spirituality to get away from our unresolved wounds, pains, and developmental needs...

Spot on

Wow. I just read this article, and this is so me. Personally I experience that fear can lead us to higher places. Fear can keep us out of our bodies, out of control, letting ourselves be lead by "the signs". That is NOT a good thing. I think a genuine take on spirituality would incorporate the lusts of the flesh as well as the frustrations we all have. Personally if spirituality doesn't deal also with sex, work, medication, people, relations, hate, anger, etc, in a way that it gives it a place, it's just some kind of stupid remedy that doesn't breathe into us. Incorporate. The word speaks about corpus, which means body? Incorporate everything. ;) May our soul and our body be strong together in our weaknesses. Thanks for the interesting read. Lot's of work to be done here.

No more turning away

Amen! Authentic spirituality is radically non-escapist, making room for all that we are, no longer separating body and soul...

Nice introduction to your book

      …And especially the author's attentive responses to comments. 

      I recently had a "spiritual" type of experience that prompted me to reconsider my attachment to the practice of Belief itself. At this moment (a couple of months into my reassessment of my own personal beliefs) I've rejected all of them, save one: I believe that I am more than just this physical body.

      All other storage placements for previously accepted thoughts have had their strong ties of Faith cut, their boxes overturned, and their contents spilled out for reexamination. In each individual case (so far) the belief has undergone an autopsy of sorts—an examination of each constituent thought, how they had worked together, and why they no longer do.

      It’s been difficult to excavate such a foundational mental construct, but I think it’s essential in order for me to discover who I am.

      After this initial reexamination I’ve concluded that belief in almost anything is nothing more than a symptom of the natural laziness of the human mind.

      On a larger scale, I've come to understand how strong beliefs can be inserted into a mentally lazy individual by the consensus belief of a society, a political regime, a religion, a terrorist organization, a law enforcement agency, a street gang, etc… which when it amasses into a Belief System develops a life of its own. Such a Belief System has the ability to stifle the thinking process of millions of people in a given society for thousands of years; way past whatever useful functionality it once may have had.

      The current rapid pace of the replacement of a previously accepted fact with new ones, along with the accelerated evolution of our consciousness, is in opposition to the very concept of Belief. Where once-upon-a-time when the pace of life was slow, and a fact or a group of facts could be assembled into a Belief, tied with a pretty bow of Faith, and assembled into a Belief System that could survive generations of reexamination and help to stabilize a society—such a form of mental laziness will no longer help us to find comfort in our worsening situation.

      The persistence of Belief Systems may be a significant factor contributing to the polarization of societies today, and may even be a cause for the extinction of humanity itself. Therefore, although I consider it an impossibility, I think it behooves us all to reconsider the lazy mental practice of Belief in particular, and the effects of Belief Systems in general—no matter their perceived psychological, physical, or spiritual value.

      There is a need greater than the need to decide what to believe. It is the need to resist the desire to believe. We need, instead, to continuously and relentlessly THINK! 

Beyond belief

Well-said, Leon! There is a difference between believing in something and directly experiencing it. Much of our work is to learn to relate TO our beliefs rather than FROM them; in doing so, our investment in particular belief systems becomes quite clear...

Rare Items Indeed

For Sale: 1.Rare recording of Huichol Indian ceremony recorded live on site in Mexico. Featuring the chants of both a man and a woman shaman. One and a half hours. The REAL thing. It will alter your mind. $283. 2.Huichol yarn painting depicting the Circle, the 4 seasonal Spirit Forces and Wirikuta, the Center of the Universe and their entire cosmology. Bartered for in Mexico. $672 3.”The New Artist”–on shamanism, art and the promise for our future. By healer, shaman Victor Greentree. Presently out of print. $51. Send orders to CircleoftheEarth.org or eguru@circleoftheearth.org

Medicine ceremony

I was in a medicine ceremony last week in Pisac, Peru where I live and there was a lot of talk about happiness. When it came my turn to speak I had to share that although happiness is a wonderful thing and I enjoy being cheerful when that emotion comes around, I would much rather be awake than happy given the choice. Spiritually awake that is. My experience of that state is that often you feel very, very sad. Spiritual awakening involves removing the filters that keep most people numb to the collective pain of humanity and the world. Those spherical carved wooden statues of the crying Buddha alude to this.

I started taking part in a

I started taking part in a weekly Medicine Wheel class a few months ago, and was so glad to hear the teachings being offered. After a few attendances, I noticed that I began to feel obligated to go. I felt like I owed it to myself to go. Becoming conscious of that made me immediately rebel. I stopped attending classes, and got major feedback on that choice from the devoted class attendees. I went through some major questioning of what was going on around me and inside of me during and after this time, and in the end decided to just appreciate the teachings as a little nudge forward, and to let it sink in and rest just as that. I feel way more comfortable with this than I do basing my feelings of well-being on learning from one teacher.

Very timely, much needed article.

I am the Queen of spiritual bypassing. I have had a difficult and dysfunctional relationship with my mother for EVER.. I am 60 now and she is 81. I began a spiritual journey 12 years ago looking to find peace and a way to cope with the pain I have always felt to selfish or guilty to express.. against my own mother, c'mon now I thought, I must rise above this. I have read many books, attending workshops, seminars. etc, etc, from all the modern day NewAge/Thought teachers. I have done all the work, I thought, to be able to handle these 'blow ups' from mom. I would walk away, tell myself 'I am lucky to have a mom to show me my 'buttons' where my work needs to be,, I would forgive her time and time again. I would see our oneness, shadows, inner child, christ selves..forgive, forgive forgive. But the anger and unfairness I felt was swallowed as I felt 'above' all that. Anger is never appropriate I would tell myself. I only need to accept what is, be in the Now and give it all to the Holy Spirit. Well how's that working for me.. it's not. Last week she blew up at me once again, this time for asking her not to give my dog any more treats. She flew into a rage for being treated like a child, her words, threw a chair across the room and it landed on my small dog who was trapped and hurt. I flew into a rage like I have never known, all the pain and anger for years surfaced. I knew in that moment how murders occur, I knew hatred, I knew violence. All these things I was 'above' as a spiritual person , an awakened Being. I was unrecognizable. It was ugly but I somehow managed to gather up my dog and get into the car and drive home. I don't know where I will go from here but I am very painfully aware that I must find a way to go deep into all this repressed pain, it is frightening because I think it may be enormous and I wonder how I can survive 'going there'. I will though, I must to survive and to begin in earnest the journey towards emotional integrity and healing. I thought I had it done, who was I kidding. The spiritual valium, yep, that's what I was on. Numbed to the pain I felt I was not entitled to feel, the it wasn't forgiving to feel. Thanks for the article that found me.

Moving beyond blind compassion

CinG, it sure sounds like you're ready to embrace a deeper, more authentic wholeness, in which you honor your boundaries to such a degree that you cease tolerating bad treatment from others. In blind compassion we make a virtue out of not confronting others, as if doing so is somehow spiritual. But in real compassion, we don't shy away from confronting those who are abusing us, however fierce our stand may be or may need to be.

Yes, go toward and into your pain, and go at a pace that allows for proper digestion and integration. Ideally, you'd do this under the guidance of a suitably skilled therapist... 

Thanks Robert.

I ordered your book on this today. Thanks again Robert, CinG

Archetypal Awareness

Having spent seven years in India studying Yoga and Eastern philosophy forty years ago I have had first hand experience with Spiritual Bypassing in myself and my generation. The neurotic start the great majority of us have had set us up for this failed strategy. A PhD psychologist friend turned me on to the early Enneagram literature in the late 80's. This opened me up to reflection on the psyche via the three archetypal systems; The Enneagram, The Jungian and astrology. The self-knowledge I gained from this far outweighed anything I learned in India at the level of the psyche. I have worked with many people who have backgrounds that include psychotherapy and/or meditation and have found that the basic awareness of their psychological infrastructure has escaped them. I believe what is needed here in the West is to develop a Yoga of the Psyche designed to ground the practitioner so that the tendency for spiritual bypassing can be seen through and dropped. www.relationshipren.com

Psychospiritual healing, awakening, and integration

Yes, Douglas, and what is perhaps even more needed is a direct, fully felt, conscious, map-transcending entry into our psychological dimensions, an odyssey into what we have spent so, so much time avoiding. Our dragons await us. And so too does the treasure that they are guarding...

Archetypal Awareness

Yes, Robert. However one can only transcend the map when one knows it is not the territory.

First of all, I am saying

First of all, I am saying this from a perspective of not reading the whole post. I think I got the message though, since I've been thinking about this from a similar angle. What (..I think logic will show us..) is the only real conclusion, in this, is that whether it is good or bad to have a "bypassing" of certain things (even totally, for the rest of ones life) - or whether there is any possibility to even measure what is good or bad, it -meaning "the whole scenario of things, and their relations"- must be seen from a higher perspective so that one can say, "because of this" "this is how the thing in this, and that case is". But since not that many of us actually have that omnicentric level of understanding of the whole nature of reality and all its sublevels, I would suppose that not that many of us, if any, can say that taking one path to attain something is good - since it needs the omnicentic perspective to say what is good and why (for everyone, in general). This is why I am thinking, it is not based on anything but assumption, to say that "spiritual bypassing" is one or the other - or that it would (..in persons / souls overall evolution..) lead necessarily into certain outcome (or even humanitys in general). But, just sharing thoughts... ( & logic ) ..peace to all.. 

Too Much Thinking Flattens Us

Lightsound, I suggest you read the whole post, letting yourself not just think about it, but also feel it and its implications.

The capacity to hold multiple perspectives does not necessarily mean that we hold all perspectives as equivalent, anymore than we cease looking morally upon various actions...

I suggest you learn to embody a perspective through which you can observe your mind at work (including whatever it might be saying about these very words of mine). 

Context Vs. Content

I’ve read your article several times and discussed it at length with my wife who is a practicing Buddhist. There is a great deal of validity to what you say. I have known people who will go so far into spiritual teaching until it becomes uncomfortable. On the other hand, I feel that becoming involved with spiritually-oriented programs (there are many, of course) is not a way to avoid “pain-numbing solutions,” but takes a great deal of courage and the desire to grow as an individual.

I have been involved in one way or another for forty years and I can say that much of the ideas about spiritual practitioners as being overly nice and misplaced compassion and an emphasis on always being happy is a media invention that does not fit the reality I have experienced. If any one would blurt out something like “Whatever bothers you about someone is really only about you.” or “It’s all just an illusion” without any context would be highly inappropriate. When someone is in pain, the only appropriate response is that of compassion.

Yet these words have a core of truth and I have never heard anyone outside of media caricatures who would tell somebody that. The truth of the matter is that in fact we are responsible for our own experience. Those who understand this and can incorporate it into their life do not run away from their pain, but transcend it to the point where they know that there is no one out there doing it to them and when they can choose to live at cause rather than at effect, the pain does not go away but it can be placed in its proper context.

Responsibility does not imply guilt, shame, or blame. It is simply a context in which to hold our experience. For example, on the surface I might be looking forward to an office party held outdoors and I tell everyone I hope it is a sunny day. When it turns out to be cloudy and the party is canceled, I could say Oh, shucks; Mother Nature had the final say and play the victim. However, if I was to look at it from a different perspective, I may have discovered that I was in fact uneasy about meeting some people at the party and had some resistance to going. That resistance was enough to create the bad weather and the cancellation. Doesn't make any sense rationally, but it is true for me.

I have been in Psychotherapy, Gestalt, and Transactional Analysis, but my real breakthrough came when I took the Est Training in 1973. It was not only an experience of emotional growth but also one of profound spirituality. Of course this program has been distorted by the media with such slogans as “pop psychology”, “me generation”, “brain washing” and so forth but I will tell you that the people who enrolled in this course had the courage to face themselves and allow all the pain to come out so that it could be dealt with. The same is true for other spiritual disciplines such as yoga and meditation.

Though some may indeed seek refuge from their problems, they soon find out through spiritual practices that “the only way out of them is through them”. Without intending to offend you, I can say honestly that I gained more insight into my problems in two weekends of the Est Training than in 5 years of psychotherapy. Programs such as Est or The Landmark Forum are not a high, a rush, or an altered state but a true discovery of who you are. There is no sudden transformation but a gradual one. It starts a process that continues for your whole life.

In the context of loving my children, for example, sometimes I like them, sometimes I dislike them. Sometimes I am happy about them; sometimes I am sad and angry. The context of love never changes, however, and is always there in my experience. Often, the pain and suffering we experience, though very real indeed, are the “stuff of life” and when we discover who we really are and our connection to others and to the universe, the pain is just there but does not run our life.

Spirituality, and a Deeper Spirituality

Thanks for this, Howard16!

I can tell you've done plenty of time in spiritual bootcamp. Some of what I address in the piece you read mainly concerns New Age spirituality and its over-emphasis on being positive. Spiritual bypassing, of course, can get very subtle, infecting even advanced practitioners of, say, Buddhism. 

I appreciate and understand what you say about your est experience. The most highly effective psychospiritual work rarely comes from prolonged psychotherapy; I myself have often seen deep breakthroughs happen in a short time, in a couple of individual sessions or in intensive groupwork. Great psychotherapy is as efficient as it is effective, without any of the cultish side-effects that more often than not were part of est...

I hope you and your wife will consider reading my book; much of what you address is covered there. 

Thanks

Thank you Dr. Masters for your gracious response. Perhaps you know something I do not about Est; however, in nine years working with Est and Werner Erhard, I never found any "cultish side-effects", other than those promoted by the media. Perhaps you are referring to the language which may sound like jargon to an outsider; however, there are no new words invented for the benefit of insiders. Every term used in the training is in the dictionary and has a specific meaning both to Est graduates and the general public.

In case you are thinking,"this guy is a true believer", believe me I did not recommend the training to others until I saw positive results in my life. Every member of my family, my wife, two children and their wives have done either Est or The Landmark Forum and never said anything other than the enormous value that they received. I acknowledge that great psychotherapy can be equally effective. The only thing I do not like are sweeping genralizations about this group or that group. Everyone is an individual trying their best to navigate through life.

Spiritual Bypassing

I like this idea very much. It is a good tool to assist in taking stock of our spiritual development. It is hard to stay true to spiritual development when life is making demands and tempting us down an easier path. It is easy to lean on whatever props us up or makes life run more smoothly. So, occasionally checking ourselves for Spiritual Bypassing sounds like a good thing.

Yet, I also found wildthing's probings to be of value.  Although Wildthing didn't get a good grade on "the test," and is obviously not the teacher's favorite. But, since that might be construed as Spiritual Bypassing, none of us should be trying to achieve that anyway. hmmmmmmmmm

There's a spiritual bypasser in all of us

You're right, IMASENSTIVE2, about needing to periodically check ourselves for spiritual bypassing. A more inclusive checking-in is to notice whatever we may be using to distract ourselves from our pain or unresolved wounds. It's not an easy step to turn toward our pain, since so much in us may be strongly propagandizing to turn in the opposite direction...

Bypassing, spirituality,psychotherapy and neuroplasticity

Firstly I think that the comment re spiritual bypassing and the risks of dissociation and premature forgiveness are very true and relevant. I have however,  reservations about the approach of traditional psychotherapy.

 

The principals of neuroplasticity would suggest that in spending considerable time going over old painful experiences we are actually helping hardwire in the habit of thinking about them- so insight based therapies may have some traps involved. THis clearly would be a problem with less skilled therapists- but finding a good therpaist is not easy and can be very much hit and miss. Then there is the issue of the time and expense involved in such therapies and the limited number of qualified practitioners.

 

My own experience is that I was recently trained in a technique called Mindfulness Integrated CBT. The technique takes about 8-10 weeks and requires 2 sessions of 1/2 hour mindfulness training as home work and weekly reviews with a clinician. It focuses on firstly training in breath mindfulness then shifting to body scanning- examining the perceived somatosensory sensations in minute detail. After several weeks one's sensory acuity increases quite radically. When this stage is reached one imagines threatening or stressful events then closely observes the body sensations involved with being angry being afraid or whatever. In doing a very focussed intent examination of the sensations, inevitably the sensations die down. With a little refinement this technique is developed into a very stabilising capacity to master emotional stress on the fly. It leads to much greater calm and confidence on the part of the practitioner. What is particularly interesting though is that as ones practice deepens- old memories surface but are re-experienced but this time in the context of profound relaxation, and a commitment not to follow or elaborate on the thought. My own experience was that I became aware of a remarkable number of subtle transferences that had been going on in my life and extinguished them virtually as they arose. Patients who have done the technique have found similar results. The MiCBT technique is focused around the idea of using neuroplasticity to train in equanimity compassion the capacity to focus attention at will and metacognition. Again my own experience was that this flowed directly into my establishing a regular meditation practice. I had been struggling to get that off the ground for about 20 years. The technique is proving quick, safe effective, and much less resource costly than traditional psychotherapy.

I do agree though that Spiritual bypassing is one of the core traps we should be aware of. The idea is relevant to anyone who is embarked on a spiritual path. In fact it is one of the hazardswarned of in Buddhist practice. ( I am now involved in a Tibetan Buddhist group).

 There have been other mentions made of New Age Spirituality, and I do think one of the traps in tha path is the relative isolation of practitioners. I find myself in a position where my practices is supported by  my fellow practitioners and our Rinpoche and have chosen my path because of the support of the group and the experienced and well grounded leader.

 It is probably quite appropriate here to think of the role of the psychotherapist as being analagous to the master - student relationship in traditional Buddhist practice.

 

 

Barliman, I agree with your

Barliman, I agree with your reservations regarding traditional psychotherapy.

The MiCBT technique you describe is the sort of practice that needs to be incorporated in psychotherapeutic work. Becoming intimate with all that we are requires the establishing of a suitable container for such necessarily deep work...

Thanks for this~

Hi Robert, thanks for your post. As a yoga teacher, I have seen myself engage in this kind of spiritual bypassing, not realizing that "nice" does not equal "good", and that "acceptance" does not equal "doormat." I've watched myself - and others - shelve negative emotions and curtail the experience of discomfort and pain in the name of compassion and non-identification. Thanks for the reminder that the whole self is necessary for any real kind of seeking. I'd love to promote your excerpt (with your links) on my site (rachelyoga.com). Would you mind? R

Toward an Asana of Radical Wholeness

Redrae, yes, an authentic spirituality asks that our entire self be brought to the mat. An asana of radical wholeness...

 And yes, feel free to promote my excerpt, along with my links, on your site.

 Robert 

i may have bypassed

I wrote a big long comment about an experience I just had last year. I was in a group of people who were all working on spirit together, but there was no 'niceness' to deal with as I felt they actually used the sword of compassion as a whipping tool to keep us in line. I left the group, but now in reading your article it seems I may have fallen into the trap you describe. I didn't see how these people were actually helping me to let go of myself completely. Instead I took the victim stance and ran away because I felt I didn't want to live in fear of 'getting in shit' anymore.

Well written

This was written with a very conscientious approach to help us navigate carefully through the potential for stumbling into a swamp full of thought-forms and dazzling distractions and distortion. Which was of course something that required a very clear indigo chakra. Awesome light shined on these subjects. Appreciated.

-JoshWaycaster

This Explains it...!

It's a relief to read this piece! I thought it was just me being picky, but almost every time I log into my Facebook account I am bombarded by pictures and posts about being positive and how everything will be ok no matter what. These are from the same people and the other week I thought to myself: 'I wonder if they are trying to convince themselves of something, because I just can't be that 'happy clappy' all the time'. I feel much better after reading this.

Of all the millions of

Of all the millions of websites available I could have read this morning, I found this gem. Wonderful! For the past few years my friends have been telling me I am spiritually advanced. I would scoff and say "No, this is not true". I pictured my ego sitting high on a throne looking out on all the other desperate people struggling, longing 'to advance' with a wry smile on my face. I haven't heard the phrase spiritual bypassing before, and it makes so much sense. I was there in the foxholes of muck and ugly fighting for my life, fully risking embarrassment I jumped in head first, feet first, sobbing and wailing, all to rid myself of whom I was not. I read self help books, had appointments with sriritual counselors, meditated until I couldn't breathe anymore. It was all neccesary(for me). Then. I currently am following a zen-like existance as this is what I do for a living, however, I cannot fully give myself over to this eastern philosophy as this will surely take me away from me. I work on people from all walks of life, and if my mind is so centered on someone else's philosophy or training, I couldn't begin to understand or learn anything else. There are so many posible paths and lovely choices, free will is a beautiful thing. I relish every painful memory that comes into my mind, ALMOST every life challenge excites me. However, sometimes I need a break and I read and meditate with the froo-froo. It's like a reality bubble bath and when I'm done I go back to work figuring out what dimension is real.