A Spill That's Not an Accident?

What is in fact extraordinary, is the cognitive dissonance you display, and your ability to compartmentalize certain facts (the ones which work for maintaining your paradigm) while dismissing outright those which challenge it.

For example.

You will try to hone in on the potentially weakest argument (as you see it)  while not answering questions which bring all of your assumptions into a different light or larger context.

I will start with 9/11.

You never answered any of my previous posts regarding the forensic science which is being amassed by thousands of non-partisan independent scholars. 

Scholars who have risked their careers to speak out on what is the crime of the century and the precedence for the complete erosion of constitutional law and protection for US Sovereigns. Not to mention the murder of 1million plus innocent Iraqi and Afghani citizens.  (*And every time I bring up courageous action you mock it, this is again is very telling of your attitude towards brave souls who answer conscience and not politics for their guide)

This is because you don't care to look yourself.  This is because you don't want to know the truth and are fighting to stay asleep.  You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.  The facts have been laid out clearly here.   http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032#

Entertain the reality of False Flag attacks,  of government's willfully manipulating their populations to achieve the ends of war-profiteers and the military industrial complex.  And then ask yourself is it really much of a stretch to imagine that BP/Halliburton/US Gov't.  May have had some complicity in this ecological disaster?  Or that there should be at least a Criminal Investigation??  Also it is very noteworthy that in Obama's oval office broadcast  who used this crisis as a way to try to usher in the "green econonmy" initiative even though along the lines of The Shock Doctrine it is already proving to be a death sentence for any economies which attempt this conversion (spain has 20% unemployment, losing 2.2 jobs for every green job created)

So after you have taken the time to watch this.  Would you therefore label the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Conspiracy Theorists?

Is this how you deal with anyone who disagrees with you?  Rather than actually logically considering whatever is presented you continually turn into a one man spin machine and attempt to muddy up the waters of whatever conversation is taking place. (Anyone who doesn't believe me just look at his posting record)  

All that is happening here is people are asking questions (Freedom of Speech) and deciding what must be done with the facts emerging.  Also you supplying BP and Halliburton press releases (damage control) does not really satisfy the questions or concerns of those who have had their lives permanently altered and may be developing the seeds of cancer while having their lifestyles destroyed by these entities.  I appreciate different perspectives and don't mind devil's advocacy.  Yet you take it a step further in your need to slander anyone you disagree with all without being willing to look at what is actually being presented. 

Now you brought up the "Birther Conspiracy" as a way to insinuate anyone who actually does research into this must be "crazy".

Official who oversaw ballots in 2008 race says hospital birth certificate non-existent

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=165041

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMUiLjBRIao

Here are 2 small snippets of information.  Can you refute any of these? Are you an elections official?  Are you Obama's Grandmother who says she say Obama being born in Kenya?  These are serious questions and bringing up Holocaust denial again as a way to insinuate some relationship to Obama not being a registered US. Citizen is very telling of your diversionary tactics.  Next you will be labeling me a racist or an anti-semite.  Is Alan Keyes rascist for questioning the legitimacy of Obama's presidency?  http://loyaltoliberty.blogspot.com/2009/02/obama-threatens-keyes-and-other.html

You can't answer most of what is brought up so you choose the one issue which is most likely to cause a knee jerk reaction of dismissal.  A knee jerk reaction that is based on emotional response, not research and not logic.

And here is another piece of information that is not allowed into "polite conversation" or the mainstream media. http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2010/03/chicago-law-school-faculty-hated...

The difference is people like Alex Jone's will create a space for all conversations to be heard.  He will bring on detractors so that he can question them one on one.  When do you ever see this in mainstream media?  There is a reason they don't allow Alex on mainstream tv. Because he sees the emperor is ass naked and is brave enough to speak of it.  (yes I know you will type an all caps dismissal of how brave he is, I attended grade school before, your tactics are identified)

I've already given you plenty of information to chew on.  Take your time, let it digest and decide if what you bring up as derision is actually more evidence for presenting the reality of the brave new world we inhabit now.

Also if you want more respect you may want to stop e-yelling (just because you say it's for emphasis doesn't mean it isn't yelling). People will be much more likely to her you if you are more polite to them.

Peace in the Middle East

 -Nano (The Nano Thermitic Pink Elephant) Google Nano Thermite 911

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

"Extraordinary claims and SUGGESTIONS require extraordinary evidence."

To suggest that Haliburton, BP, or any other corporate / government bureaucracy  would willfully conspire to increase profit, power and control is NOT an extraordinary claim at all. Maybe for you it is. But for many of us, we see it as par for the course these days. False flag operations have been employed for centuries in order to gain and economic leverage. It's nothing new.

I'm not saying that I fully subscribe to the idea that this is the case with the leak. But I'd be more surprised to find out that this is just an accident than I would be to find out that it was in fact a coordinated effort .

"The late Susan Sontag complained, "Her criticisms of my books are stupid and shallow and not to the point." Salman Rushdie referred to her as "a weird woman who seems to feel the need to alternately praise and spank." Most notoriously, last year Norman Mailer called Kakutani, who is of Japanese descent, a "one-woman kamikaze" and a "token" minority hire."

And here is another piece of information that is not allowed into "polite conversation" or the mainstream media.http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2010/03/chicago-law-school-faculty-hated... 

 Here is an idea.  Just because a mainstream blog or magazine doesn't carry a story does not mean the story isn't official.  That is pre web thinking.  I suggest you upgrade your specs.

-Nano (The Nano Thermitic Pink Elephant)

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."