Schrödinger's Cat(aclysm)

In 1935,
the physicist Erwin Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment in which a live
cat was placed in a sealed box together with a mechanism that could be
triggered by a quantum event -- the decay of a subatomic particle that had a
certain probability of happening -- that would kill the cat when it occurred.
According to quantum theory, subatomic particles can be in a condition of
superposition -- in other words, the particle can be in two states at once, until
observed. Thus, the killing mechanism in the box could be both triggered and
not triggered. So, Schrödinger wondered: Could the cat be both alive and dead
at the same time?
For some thinkers, including Einstein, this was obviously impossible, a reductio ad absurdum. But for others, it
was clear that quantum physics points to just this possibility. To explain such
theoretical high strangeness, many theories have since emerged, including the
possibility of parallel universes.
But Schrödinger's cat has today emerged from its box, and is dead-and-alive and
well and smiling uncannily at us, like another cat from Cheshire, from every
point of our macro-reality. We are clearly now passing through an extraordinary
moment of the revelation of quantum superposition in our phenomenal plane.
Let's take a look at some of the nine lives of Schrödinger's elusively undead
feline. In the political realm, it is perhaps most obvious. For example, did
Egypt just celebrate a successful popular revolution or has freedom been
curtailed by a military coup? It is clear that both are true. Egypt is in a
state of political superposition. In fact, this is true of many states today,
and the number of such superposed countries is multiplying rapidly. Indeed, if
we look closely enough, we can see that it is true of all -- nations today are
both functioning and failed states at the same time. The U.S. is the best
example -- it is both the richest and the most impoverished. If you don't believe
it, check out the size of its national debt.
In sociological terms, the same superposition is visible. People are in upward
mobility and simultaneously in downward mobility. They are happy and miserable.
Their lives are both full and empty. Some would prefer to call it denial, but
it is a genuine superposition.
In a more paranormal level of life, we can examine the experiences of
thousands, if not millions, of people who say they have been abducted by
aliens. Their experiences certainly seem real to them. Yet the objective
evidence is slim to none. Alternative mundane explanations can account for
these stories, and the case histories show every indication of fitting snugly
into the profile of hysteria, as developed in Lacanian psychoanalytic theory,
or archetypal visions, if you ask a Jungian. On the other hand, there is indeed
a tremendous amount of objective evidence that extraterrestrials are visiting
our planet. Did non-earthly beings really kidnap these people -- or do they
suffer from hysterical delusions? Or archetypal downloads from the collective
unconscious? What if all the above are true? This is an important example of
superposition that is directly affecting the consciousness of large numbers of
human beings. In many cases, the superposition has shifted into an even more
radical octave: there are a growing number of apparently sane people who feel
that they themselves are both human and alien.
Quantum undecidability also reigns in most people's minds about whether we are
headed for planetary apocalypse or the dawn of a golden age. Some see that it
is obvious that modern life is unsustainable ecologically, and can list all the
plagues that are coming at us right now, which require not just four horsemen,
but a stampeding army of wraith-riders bringing death and destruction as karmic
blowback to our morally degraded world. But others are living in glorious
optimism, in a sunny world of high technology that will soon solve all our
planet's problems, and even lead to a singularity in which human intellect
merges with far more powerful artificial intelligence in a cyborg utopia of
limitless longevity for titanium-based life forms sharing a virtual matrix of
unified consciousness. Still others find the cyborg future a horrid dystopian
vision, and instead share a different sort of optimism, seeing a future of
transcendent beings in light bodies, re-dreaming the world through mystic
psycho-technology, in a unified field of divine love. Can all these visions be
simultaneously true? Quantum theory says yes (and simultaneously of course,
no).
If indeed what we are witnessing is quantum superposition writ large, then many
people will be experiencing this as terrifying fragmentation. It is producing
anxiety and even psychosis in some, and at the same time, ecstatic mystical
awakening in others. In fact, some people are in superposed states of
enlightenment and psychic meltdown in the same instant. There was a time when
we needed to take LSD, magic mushrooms, or ayahuasca to experience such
feelings and throw open the doors of multidimensional perception. But now, it
is happening unbidden to more and more of us.
A comedienne some years ago delivered a wonderful line: Reality is a crutch for
people who can't handle drugs. But things have now changed. The crutch is being
removed. Reality itself is a drug that is wearing off. None of our stories hold
together any more. The opposites are crashing into one another. Time is
yielding to simultaneity. Sense and nonsense interpenetrate.
Of course, religion has always affirmed quantum superposition. What is Christ
except the symbol of the superposition of man and God? The Buddhists say that
samsara is in superposition with nirvana. Form is superposed with emptiness.
The Advaitins assert that that the world of multiplicity is superposed with the
Absolute. Duality is nonduality. The ego mind is in superposition with the mind
of God, body-consciousness with the Buddha-nature.
Schrödinger's monstrous cat has been loosed upon our world. We had better
prepare ourselves for its approach. It is marking its territory everywhere. It
is rubbing against our legs. We are already in quantum entanglement with its
tail. Soon it will jump into our lap. Already we can't tell if we are coming or
going, if we are at alpha or omega. You look into the mirror and see the back
of your head. You look in someone's eyes and realize you are gazing at
yourself. You look out the window and see a déjà view. "You know something's
happening here, but you don't know what it is." The cat has disappeared yet
somehow it is beginning to speak through your mouth. You are becoming the cat's
meow.
Some of us hope to awaken from our surrealistic pillow, while others relish
playing in the inter-net of Indra. But this feline genie will not be put back
into the Klein Bottle of Schrödinger's mind. The apocalypse of linear thinking
is already upon us. Normalcy is a pipe dream. Materialism is a laugh,
capitalism a bad smell that is thankfully dissipating, and the whole symbolic
order is written in vanishing ink. Even the continents are poised to sink
beneath the waves and allow new landmasses to rise in a re-born Earth.
Everything is now possible.
But this magical moment in which the quantum wave is de-collapsing will not
last. We are returning to the initial conditions of transfinite quantum
potentiality, as the cosmic wave massively superposes new possibilities upon
every undecidable superposition, burgeoning into a blur of becoming, ghostly
waves of nightmarish beauty, extending outward and inward to infinity upon infinity.
We are in a real Fantasia, and the sorcerer's apprentice has muffed the mantra
in a ghastly goof. And yet it is a given, opening us again to the giving-ness
of God.
Return, t'shuvah in the Kabbalistic
tradition, enables tikkun -- the repair
of the world. But full repair cannot be achieved unless we surrender to the
Absolute beyond all possible conditions. As Islam rightly insists, there is no
god but God. We must stop our worship of the ego, our sin of making idols out
of money, physical beauty, power, or other mere mirage-like manifestations of
the Absolute, and return all our attention and love one-pointedly to the
Source. For optimal results in this tango of entanglement, the cosmic dance of
Shakti and Shiva, we must humbly pay our homage to Emptiness. We must
de-cathect our demonic and catabolic desires, de-focus our fixations, and junk
our juvenile jouissance. Only then can we avoid being overwhelmed by the deadly
fallout of our malpractice of creative consciousness.
This is the moment not only of superposition, but of super-consciousness. If we
awaken to the hidden power we have been given, and use it with integrity, then
this bardo state will birth a paradise; otherwise, what is to ensue will be
unbearable. And the ultimate option is now also open: Supreme Liberation from
this hall of mirrors, in union with the Absolute. Whatever you choose, says
Schrödinger's cat, remember it is all purr-fection.
Namaste,
Shunyamurti
Image by Sol Grundy, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet- 4-5-11
- Shunyamurti's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version









Comments
The Schrödinger paradox
Only Within ... Forever Without
Such talk is really nothing but it's own inertial perpetuation.
We only reason and ration to the degree we are not intuitive and steadfast.
There are really no such points of contention outside of the human mind.
We create are own prophecies in relation to our own pathologies and visa versa. Nothing else is really being discussed here.
The mere perpetuation of a spiritual commune in relation to a projected idiocracy .. and again visa versa ... no judgment intended.
Take away humanistic inertia and even the "quantum" doesn't exist.. Just ask Ramana Maharshi.
It is just a question of developing an all-encompassing perspective.
Tree of Life .. or Tree of Knowledge ... appetite or satisfaction ... anxiety or anxiousness ... it is only we who are here in self perpetuating polarization.
No other species is lost to their own folly ... and found only in relation to their own loss.
All is already contained within the very presence of each .. lost and found only in relation to it's own misnomer
Wonderful article.
what an idea
A false dichotomy
With all due respect, I think that this issue is too important for us to discuss it in extremes. I have to agree with JO.
I think that you are presenting your readers with a false dichotomy. If we move forward with this mindset, the only result will be entropy. Truth is balance.
When we think about the objective reality in extremes, it's generally in reaction to psychological distress (entropy).
Thus, I believe that the "quantum superposition" that we are experiencing today (collectively and individually) is predicated on imbalance - both psychologically and in regards to resources and information.
If we do not address this issue rationally the result will be entropy and the system will break down. However, I am confident that we will all come together and work it out soon enough.
We all need to let go of our egos, respect each others perspectives and find a middle ground. There is room for disagreement, but we need to learn how to compromise for the benefit of the group. That is where I believe we will find both truth and stability.
I think that some of the confusion comes from the misinterpretation of the term "polarity." When we talk about the masculine/femine, ying/yang or magnetic fields, we need to realize that these poles only exist because they are in balance with one another. They can not exist independently.
"Hyperspace" doesn't count.
From my perspective, the biggest issue that we are facing right now is an imbalance of information. On one hand, industry is working very hard to aggregate internet bandwidth, media and political lobbyists. At the same time, industry makes up the infrastructure that we depend on and contributes to our economy.
On the other hand, we have a population of very bright individuals and when given the opportunity, they can collectively increase output (in terms of information processing) faster than industry or academia. This could lead to economic growth (without all the pollution) as well as "order."
Here are the extremes:
At first glance, the first option sounds "bad" and the second option sounds "good."
That said, here are some practical considerations that need to be addressed: privacy and civil rights, infrastructure, emotional manipulation, economic growth, psychological stability, happiness and sustainability.
A world with free distribution of information means that we have no privacy. And a world without privacy is a world without free will. It is a world of psychological slavery.
However, a world in which information is controlled and its distribution is replaced with novelty and "noise" is a world of uncertainty, psychological imbalance and inefficiency.
There is a balance. And we will find it once we stop thinking in extremes.
Since this is RS, below are a few spiritual metaphors that I think we should all be meditating on right now:
In short, truth is found in balance. Suffering is found in the dichotomy of extremes.
BTW - I hope that I didn't come off as rude. This is a very important issue to me right now, so I felt compelled to speak up and express my perspective.
Thank you.-Eric T Hanson
'Alive and Dead at once'
Maybe you can clear this concept up for us.
My understanding of 'observation disturbing state' was originally based on facts dealing with equipment used in an attempt to trap an atom in place; or methods to measure an atom in movement.
One logically couldn't do both at one and the same time.
In my simplistic comprehension of this, 'observation' of an atom track or a trapped atom cannot reliably in either case say anything absolutely about 'energy' from either case.
What is the energy potential of a stationary atom?
An atom track can be captured, and presumably if that same picture and the energy released by a target hit by that exact same atom is all about just that one atom, one could come to some approximation of an 'internal' energy potential in the same kind of atom in motion, but not 'at rest'???? A loose atom gains something, an atom in a large mass, 'mass defect' and other problems for an atom 'relatively' at 'rest': different values. No single formula has universal applicability. Defect of the 'abberations' or 'rejectable' error conveniently tossed out by averagings I gather.
Isn't this is the big problem? which I thought was what the Heisenberg 'uncertainty principle' was addressing. Which lead to the Schrodinger attempt at humor.
In other words: technical methods, not about consciousness or some act by consciousness such as 'observation'. Later on, someone thought: hey! maybe THOUGHT has something to do with it!
???????
I have sometimes thought all this had to do with problems of an atom model, ideas about what 'space' really is, recognition that no purely physical model accomodates consciousness . . . the 'odd element'. That was the inroad for this interpretation of 'quantum' maybe?
Furthermore, I was under the impression that Schodinger's 'CAT' story was a mockery of TECNIC of his time, and the fine problem of understanding the atom or any molecule as if it were a solid.
Then my mind finds this an interesting issue: when does an atom have 'solidity'. When it is it 'material', have inertia, mass, etc. Resist being changed?
Evidently, 'energy' also has 'inertia', which to my simple mind seems to imply that 'time' also has inertia, though 'energy' doesn't necessarily have vector or velocity.
Physics, as such, has so many problems so far beyond my puny reading. I look at the enormous energy by men and women who make machines of such enormous complexity I often wonder who-all has all that knowledge so well grasped, so well written down, so that when all the current makers die off, some later generation will know what loose bolt to look for when the equipment gets a 'snag'.
Recently, as you no doubt know:
"Nicolas Gisin, a physicist at the University of Geneva in Switzerland, devised a new test to see if the human eye could pick out signs of 'entanglement'1."
1.Pomarico, E., Sanguinetti, B., Sekatski, P., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Preprint available at arXiv:1104.2212v1 (2011).
One can read it at a link to Nature, which is online.
(I can't give the link, or I'll be unable to post this due to 'captcha' on this site).
I've read this article referred to above several times, and still don't get what was conclude-able.
I do find the aspect of light in the eyes interesting.
Light from the world is one thing. The entire outer world by means of the senses is one thing.
The other side of the coin is the light we perceive when our eyes are closed. When we dream, when we rub our eyes, we see 'stars' and in dream we see 'movies' and at the same time feel feelings.
The translation from internal experience as reception and perception of the world as 'atom' writ large' is no doubt a very strange interface.
No doubt the sports fan thinks by turning a hat backwards or turning off the game when the prefered team is losing will 'alter' the events.
When things go 'well': 'the hat trick works!' When things don't go well: 'didn't turn the hat the right way!'
Then the 'emprical method' will call on a million different ways raised to nth power ere one learns the right method or technique.
Live long and prosper with that.
I gather you are using a dogmatic voice as a kind of challenge to thought by your readers. Not that you are really 'revealing' some understanding of this 'special moment' in time when we can bring forth 'paradise' by adopting the 'right' attitude.
That's okay.
I happen to agree that there can be a power that is within grasp of every thinker, but think it inactive unless recognised, thought about, used and allowed to flow forth after abandoning thought as simply far too insufficient to the work compared to simply feeling it.
Maybe an impersonal element of consciousness drawn to 'a contrite spirit', that trembles at the simplest of things in self and nature at large that are beautiful.
Responding with kindness, generosity, judgement and fairness.
I think such perceptions and reactions have persisted through time, in all epochs, and not simply as some deemed period of 'great change'.
The feeling element goes forward, different modes of thought dry up, fade away, displaced by closer and closer approximations to the better part of human nature.
This stuff is so deep. Trying to grasp it: lot's of work.
Thanks for a little more introduction about it or your thinking about it.
Still not sure I get it.
Still, intertaining read. Exciting stuff to ponder. The 'back-story' is so large, doubt it will get much traction of interest.
I'll have to re-read this one more than once. Hope it doesn't change too much as I ponder rereading it.
---------
Whatever I said: maybe the opposite! Or the opposite of the latter. You decide!