Responding to Jesus Bootcamps

The recent startling and poignant 2006, Academy Award nominated film, “Jesus Camp,” reported that 1 out of every 4 Americans considers themselves evangelical Christians.
The film exposes the way in which young children in evangelical, fundamentalist churches in the United States are indoctrinated with polarized, absolutist and intolerant moral schemas from the age of five on up. The film is highlighted by scenes in which children are told that the science of global warming and evolution, for example, are evil conspiracies created by people in need of God: the sinners.
The temptation after viewing such a film is to exhibit the same behavior, to place the mind or spirit in polarized opposition to Christian fundamentalism.
Transcending this cycle of polarization is difficult. But in working towards a synthesis, towards peaceful dialogue, it is important to recognize that another large majority of the Christian culture in the US would claim to be far more moderate or liberal in comparison. In a recent edition of National Geographic one such Christian, Francis Collins, is interviewed.
Collins is the current leader of the Human Genome project and author of The Language of God, The End of Science, and Rational Mysticism. Collins’ voice in the recent interview offers a guiding hand for those moderate Christians seeking fusions of rationality and intuition, science and divinity. His thoughts may be equally helpful for enraged liberals too dramatically polarized from fundamentalists or Christianity entirely.
Tweet
- 5-14-07
- Adam Elenbaas's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
A Nice Tension
In response to this article
In response to this article I went to some footage on YouTube, and stumbled across a discussion of the film on Bill Maher's show. I was awestruck by the conversation's bumbling attempts to elucidate wisdom on the subject of religion. "Religion" is spoken of generally as a tug of war between Islam and Christianity, and between those who think they have what others lack and those who feel belittled by fundamentalist beligerence.
Where are the Eastern religions in this discussion? The Vedic teachings are known as "Sanatana Dharma," or the religion of the universe - that very truth which must be the same in all places, here and in the furthest reaches of the universe. This tradition recognizes all other traditions - indeed, all things - as manifestations of divinity. (Note: The word "Hindu" is simply a reference to the Indus river in India. Sanatana Dharma is the true name of Hinduism).
Can any discussion about religion (or rather, the science of truth) be serious without mentioning those ancient systems of practice which are based on radical acceptance of all phenomena? We could get into the fact that this radical acceptance is actually based on rejecting the actuality of all phenomena, but this has already become a long comment.
At one point, Maher sternly declars "God doesn't talk to you. You talk to him, and anything that happens as a result is up in the air."
The video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=309MCU8TonE
It's always shocking to see