Support our Kickstarter

Remote Viewing Institute Issues Grave Call to Mainstream Science

farsightLarge.jpg


The Farsight Institute, a non-profit organization focused on the scientific application of remote viewing, recently released a challenge to mainstream science: organize a tightly controlled, publicly viewable scientific display of the phenomenon of remote viewing in return for mainstream recognition of the validity of the phenomenon itself. And do it in the narrowing window of a vanishing 2012 timescape.

Dr. Courtney Brown, an Atlanta-based professor who directs the Institute, has spearheaded the development of a novel Prometheus Protocol for conducting scientific Remote Viewing experiments. He uses multiple world-class, military-grade remote viewers in sophisticated ways that are able to be, and have been, followed and verified by the public. Brown is urgently requesting the attention of the mainstream science community, which lags behind the findings of some pioneering exploratory scientists. 

Citing the combination of The Farsight Institute's grim post-2012 studies and the recent actions of those in power (Brown cites the following: "(1) the termination of the U.S. manned spaceflight program, (2) the sealing of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, (3) the withdrawal of long term resources and management capabilities from many global economies, including that of the U.S., (4) the construction of extensive, hardened underground facilities for the military and political elite, despite the lack of nuclear enemies, and (5) repeated dire warnings from NASA and NOAA regarding expected unprecedented and long-term Carrington Events."), Brown offers his Institute's services:

"If select and important leaders of mainstream science recognize the reality of remote viewing, then we at The Farsight Institute will conduct a major and extended sequence of remote-viewing demonstrations that will satisfy nearly all people with respect to this reality. All the details of how to conduct such a series of demonstrations have been worked out. The scientific controls will be perfect, and we will involve the public in the verification process.

"We have conducted such remote-viewing demonstration projects before. See, for example, our Multiple Universes Project. The big differences between our past demonstrations and our anticipated "big demonstration" is that we will involve a widely trusted luminary as our target tasker, we will utilize only our best viewers, and we will have a much larger watching audience.

"We are offering to do now and quickly what mainstream science cannot do by itself for a very long time in terms of educating the public in these matters that have long been resisted in our world. These matters of remote viewing, nonlocality, and even extraterrestrial life are truly important right now."

The Farsight Institute offers a wide variety of educational material on the phenomenon of remote viewing, much of it free and accessible via their website (linked below), and much of it performed and designed using tight, precise reason that merits a look from those interested in applying the human capability for scientific reason as applied to our experience of reality. In addition, many of their study results and protocol are clearly available to the public as evidence to be analyzed rather than conclusive or hysterical prediction as is sometimes offered by the remote-viewing community. 

Additional Links:


Image by Vos Efx, courtesy of Creative Commons licensing.

Comments

"He uses multiple

"He uses multiple world-class, military-grade remote viewers in sophisticated ways that are able to be, and have been, followed and verified by the public." Wouldn't it have been nice if the article could have cited references to these amazing tests? That's a pretty bold claim to make. Without evidence to back it up, I'd have to say this piece is a bullshit sandwich, not a reality sandwich. Remote viewing is wishful thinking & wild speculation at best, and can easily transmute to outright fraud.

Remote viewing

Not up to speed on RV eh?

Check out the recent work done on the Baltic Anomaly.  The salvage divers verified information provided to them by remote viewers. The viewers described the anomaly in amazing detail before the salvage crew returned to make the dive down to the anomaly. There was no possible physical way for them to know this information since no human ever laid eyes on what the divers discovered.

What would be the harm in setting up a tightly controlled experiment bound by strict scientific method?   Why not make public what the CIA, U.S. military and Russians have known for many decades?  I am highly critical of everything but I've seen enough RV examples to warrant wider investigation and more intense scrutiny.

Please post links to

Please post links to scientific studies which verify Remoting Viewing.

Remote Viewing

To address the first comment. There is a book called "Limitless Mind" which addresses the issues and challenges of remote viewing. This is from Russell Targ, a former military trainer in remote viewing. What makes this book different is that it shows you the extremely simply methods you can try at home to practice remote viewing. I, as an amateur tried this and was totally successful. If the military has been using this for decades and a regular dude like myself can make it work, I don't see where the cynicism comes from except not trying it for yourself. I might have even felt like you do until I experienced it for myself. Easy to judge what we have not researched enough with our own sense. "Limitless Mind" allows you to do so. I hope this comment helps with love and care! Unconditionally love Unconditionally forgive Seek truth wherever it may be found

Spammers should be banned.

Spammers should be banned.