Support our Kickstarter

The Rebirth of Tarot

Occult America Coverbig2.jpg

The following is excerpted from Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our Nation, recently released by Bantam.

 

As the 1950s wore on, the occult could seem like something of a spent force in American life. Foes of Spiritualism had exposed one mediumistic fraud after another; Theosophy, with an aging membership and no more communiqués from the Masters, had begun to seem like a frumpy lecture society; the Reverend Norman Vincent Peale had retooled the Mesmeric and New Thought-based practices of "positive thinking" into mild motivational fare; and the most vibrant personalities of the American occult, from Baird T. Spalding to Edgar Cayce, had passed on to Summer Land. By the end of the decade, the occult could appear to be little more than an amalgam of eccentrics and loners who sat "vain, nervous, inept, neurotic, and fearful in their chintz-curtained apartments," philosopher Jacob Needleman wrote, "complacently treasuring The Hidden Knowledge."

A new voice was needed. And it arrived just as the cusp of the 1960s -- or what some considered the opening of the Aquarian Age foreseen in astrology -- came into sight. The voice belonged to a New York based actress, bookshop owner, and student of metaphysical ideas named Eden Gray. As thought movements tend to blend one into the other, so did American occultism give way to the New Age in Gray's immensely readable, sprightly guides to Tarot cards. In her work, one can see the American occult evolving into the larger New Age culture of the second half of the twentieth century.

Born in Chicago in 1901, Gray changed her name from Priscilla Pardridge for the stage. As an aspiring actress in the 1920s, she moved to New York. Gray was cast in a variety of stage roles, playing opposite Edward G. Robinson and Helen Hayes. Over the course of marriage and divorce, travel, and World War II -- in which she served stateside as an Army lab technician -- her acting career got waylaid. In the 1950s, she attempted to reignite her career using the visualization principles of Religious Science, the mind-power philosophy espoused by Ernest Holmes. Almost immediately, Gray landed an unlikely role in a London stage play.

Gray later returned to New York and became active with the First Church of Religious Science on Manhattan's East 48th Street (another Midtown anomaly, just a few blocks from Blavatsky and Olcott's old Lamasery). Deeply affected by her spiritual experiences and with encouragement from her Religious Science minister, Gray decided to pursue a new career in the occult -- but from her own fresh, energetic perspective. In 1954 she opened a metaphysical bookstore, Inspiration House, on Manhattan's East Side and began giving Tarot readings. Patrons complained to her that no really practical Tarot guide existed. The actress-turned-occultist responded with a book of her own.

Gray's 1960 volume, The Tarot Revealed -- a beautiful oblong hardcover designed by her artist son, Peter Gray Cohen -- arrived like a ray of sunshine to a generation of readers. Occult acolytes of the postwar era had grown wearily accustomed to colorless works like Englishman Arthur E. Waite's 1911 Pictorial Key to the Tarot, one of the few "popular" guides available. Waite's manner was hesitant and withholding, as though writing under duress for a general readership. While Paul Foster Case's The Tarot had been available since 1947, he committed little space to divination, the area that most interested Tarot enthusiasts. With Gray's work, readers no longer had to pine for a useful "how-to." She combined simple instructions, enticing (if sometimes fanciful) occult history, and a New Thought-inspired tone: "Give those for whom you read encouragement to strive for their highest ideals. The seeds you plant can blossom into lovely flowers of accomplishment."

Gray's writing was friendly, informal, and practical. It would not please everyone. Esoteric scholar Manly P. Hall, born the same year as Gray, believed the New Age generation cheapened esoteric ideas, proffering quick fixes rather than demanding a lifetime of study. Regardless, the new era belonged to Gray. And, in her own shorthand style, she offered many of the same ideas as Hall and the more "serious" esotericists. New York publishers began to reprint her work and look for more. By the early 1970s, Tarot and other occult how-to guides -- ranging from palmistry and astrology, to numerology and candle-magic -- numbered in the hundreds. The era of New Age publishing had begun.

 

 

Mitch Horowitz is the editor-in-chief of Tarcher/Penguin. He is giving a reading from Occult America at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, September 23rd at Barnes and Noble at 6th Avenue and West 8th Street in New York, and speaking Saturday, October 3rd and Sunday, 4th at the Philosophical Research Society in Los Angeles. Mitch is also presenting a lecture on the occult history of New York at the New York Open Center at 8 p.m. on Tuesday, September 29th and conducting an Esoteric New York Walking Tour, also through the Open Center, from 2-5 p.m. on Sunday, October 11th. For details please visit http://www.opencenter.org/.

 

Teaser image by Eponabri, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

 

 

Comments

Tarot Rookie

I've been meaning to get into Tarot for awhile now, as so many of the creative types that i look up to are Tarot experts/enthusiasts - Jodorowshi and Brian Eno to name just a couple.

However, I always tend to procrastinate a bit when trying to settle on something that I don't feel very knowledgeable about. So my question to whoever would like to take a minute to answer is: What does one consider in choosing the right Tarot deck for ones self?

Feeling, my friend. Certain

Feeling, my friend. Certain decks, with certain origins, strike a resonance in certain individuals who may, even beyond their conscious awareness, have some kind of affiliation to that deck's origins, whether it's from a past life or aspects of the present one they're not entirely aware of or haven't developed yet. The choosing of a deck based upon this ends up becoming an interesting path of self-discovery in itself. One little bit of advice with this consideration: speed kills the censor. Don't hesitate in your choosing. If you feel a strong resonance with a deck, grab it! The self-limiting censor always speaks AFTER intuition, not before.

 

Hope this helps friend. This is, of course, just one means of considering a deck, one that I personally find meaningful. Do as you will please. But check out www.facade.com. Has free online tarot divinations using your choice of just about any deck you can find in publication. Cheers!

Thank you, Giacomo

Yes, that does help.  The bit about choosing based on initial impulse makes a lot of sense.  Thank you and take care.

Tarot is a family of trick taking card games.

This is a well written and informative account but it is a very one sided treatment of tarot as occultism and this one sided treatment distorts and stereotypes the culture of people. The author should mention that tarot cards haven't always been used in occultism. Tarot cards were originally intended in the 15th century for game playing, for a type of game still played in countries like France, Italy, Switzerland Austria, and Hungary. It wasn't until the 18th century due to the influence of an Antoine Court de Gebelin that the cards were interepreted as occult. American tarot game players are trying to educate the public about these card games and it's time for the media to stop giving the impression that tarot cards were intended for occultism or that occultism is the only use of these cards. Dave Schneider For further info on the games of tarot http://www.tarocchino.com

The Occult Tarot

While it is true that the Tarot was devised as a series of trick-taking games, probably around the turn of the fifteenth century, to say that the use of the Tarot had no occult inspiration before the eighteenth century is a misstatement.

 Historical evidence suggests that the triomphi (trumps) of the Tarot were inspired  by esoteric--occult, if you like--teachings regarding the "triumph" of certain principles, such as Love, Death, and Fortune, over one another. This is best attested in Petrarch's poem the Trionfi (written between 1354 and 1371, well before the earliest attested Tarot decks). It was also expressed in the triumphal pageants of the Renaissance, which were meant to express the same ideas; Jakob Burckhardt's classic Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy contains some description of these.

To say that the Tarot had no "occult" inspiration--whatever "occult" may mean to any given writer--is thus misleading. The Tarot was intended to express certain principles of what was widely known at the time as the occulta philosophia or "occult philosophy." To say that this attribution started with Court de Gebelin in the eighteenth century is thus inaccurate. It is due in part to the misconception that "occult" ideas were marginalized in the Renaissance as they are now--which is the opposite of the truth. 

In short, the Tarot was not created by the fourteenth-century equivalent of the Parker Brothers. 

Not quite,

The fact remains that there is no record of tarot card reading until the 18th century. We may never know exactly why these particular themes were chosen to illustrate the trumps by the inventor of the tarot, but we do know that 15th century Italians played games with these cards and did not view them in the same way that recent tarot readers like Eden Gray viewed them. The 15th century Italians did not do tarot card readings. I think Horowitz was negligent in omitting these facts.

 

Parker Bros. may have more connections with the occult than tarot. Before being absorbed into Hasbro, it was Parker Bros. who were the distributers of the Ouija board in the United States.

Renaissance Iconography

As I understand it, the first recorded allusion to divination by playing cards is in the memoirs of Casanova in the eighteenth century, who mentions that he bought a Russian serf girl who was much addicted to this practice. This hardly makes it sound as if it was a novelty in Casanova's time, since Russian serf girls were not exactly likely to be on the cutting edge of cultural innovation (and Russia is far from Italy, where the cards were invented).

As for why these themes were chosen, it is far from a mystery, as the themes are repeated in many different forms in Renaissance art and literature. I mentioned Petrarch's Trionfi in the previous post, which is the most famous but far from the only instance. While their meanings may not be identical to those of Eden Gray and other present-day Tarot interpreters, there is at least a family resemblance.

Horowitz's objectivity disputed.

To say that the historical tarot was occult is to classify all culture of the late medieval/renaissance period as "occult" The images reflected what were regarded as conventional Christian themes of that time.

To get back to my main point. Historians who neglect the fact that the tarot was originally made for games do an injustice to history. I think Horowitz did a fine job concerning the Freemasons, but I think he "cherry picked" some of the facts concerning tarot so as not to disrupt the "occult" mystique of tarot cards. I think his apparent bias for this mystique clouds his objectivity as a historian. We know that Horowitz is familiar with the works of Michael Dummett because he uses Dummett as a source yet he ignores one of Dummett's most important findings on tarot, that these cards were made for a game.

 

 

Reyling on "historical evidence"

isn't always the best way to acquire information. Just because we don't have "records" of certain people have mystical experiences in a certain time period (such as indigenous shamans of some culture or even a seemingly random visionary/solitary mystic in some western culture), that doesn't mean they didn't have those experiences. To stop and simply say the Tarot has it's origins in a mere card game is being just as one-sided as your target.

Intimate, first-hand experience with the Tarot, it's Qabbalistic structure and Egyptian symbolism, proves otherwise (and by this, I mean going beyond its basic Divinatory use); this wisdom predates Tarrochini and Western Civilization itself by a long run. If the assertion of the Tarot having it's basis in Tarrochino were true, then why is it that we don't have a slew of other game-based world renowned and traditionally-rich methods of Divination? I don't see mystical kick-balls or people playing cricket or running bases for deep spiritual in/foresight...

 And the obvious Chritian iconography within the old Italian Tarrochini decks was simply nothing more than a means of safeguarding the perpetuation of secrets that would otherwise be stigmatized as "witch craft" by the prevailing authority of the time period.

 

following our Will and Wind, we may just go where no One's been

 

Spiral Out ~

www.myspace.com/archaic_revival

And for the record

There are many others aside from, and preceading, Horowitz, who assert that the Tarot has it's roots in occult and mystical origins, and not that of the Italian card game. So to attack and criticize this author's credibility and objectivity is to do the same of a great many other authors and sources of information on the subject.

 

following our Will and Wind, we may just go where no One's been

 

Spiral Out ~

www.myspace.com/archaic_revival

Other games have been used for divination

Tarot is not the only game to be used in divination. Cartomancy with the 54 card deck was practiced before the use of tarot for divination. Dice have been used in divination. I've seen examples of Mah Jong used for divination. Even chess has been involved. See Enochian Chess, a chess variant created by Golden Dawn members.

I would not call tarot a "mere game" I happen to know it's a pretty good game because I'm a player of it. I think historical evidence is more reliable than subjective mystical experiences. The oldest surviving tarot decks are those 15th century Christian Italian tarocchi cards. There has been no evidence of earlier tarot decks or of any intent to conceal secrets or any Qabbalistic or Egyptian connections. All the fantasies of the 18th and 19th century occultists have been debunked.

In regards to historical evidence and the value of "fact"

"The fact that the word myth has become synonymous with untruth belies an underlying shift in our epistemological focus over the past several thousand years. To generalize: we have become, as a culture, a great deal more concerned with verifiable facts and less concerned with the existential truths which have a different relation to fact. This progression ties not only into the Enlightenment focus on rationality and the scientific method, but, perhaps more pervasively and certainly more recently, we can see this following from the needs of industrialization. Fundamental business principles rely on actions that are easy to reproduce, and which produce similar if not identical results with each reptition. This promotes an economy of scale that is absolutely necessary for so-called big business. 

The dual meaning of myth seems to come as a by-product of the industrialist-capitalist worldview, and provides a certain cultural insight. In its proper sense, myth has no necessary relation to fact whatsoever. It is true insofar as it renders a psychological effect, and false insofar as it doesn't. This is not to say that fact has no bearing on myth. Far from it. That the inner and outer life appear as mirror images of one another, separated by what appears to be a vast divide, is another issue that we must contend with, as it has mythological repercussions. 

To anyone who winces at the thought of a story being "just fiction," this common definition is more than unfortunate, for myths have been the lifeblood of culture since the birth of civilization. This common, or modern, definition is not at all what we mean when we say "myth" here. However, the common definition defines our cultural stance against spirituality, our dependence upon fact as our only source of psychological nourishment. (It also defines our misunderstanding of the purpose of symbols.) If we take the premise that myth is something vital to our nature, then an absence of it, or an absence of the ability to recognize it, would be a deep cultural and existential crisis. A quick glance at current events makes it clear enough that we are in just such a position, even though no clear connection between the two has yet been drawn. "*

 

That's all I've got to say on the subject...

 

*Obtained from:

http://www.realitysandwich.com/immanence_myth

 

 

following our Will and Wind, we may just go where no One's been

 

Spiral Out ~

www.myspace.com/archaic_revival

The Cards Don't Lie

I've always had good experiences with Tarot, especially on difficult questions.

Your book looks very interesting and I look forward to reading it!

www.flickr.com/photos/21366765@N03

Tarot as Energy Mirrors -- thanks for the article!

I teach Tarot as a personal evolution coaching tool, using Jungian Guided Imagery as part of the process. So I'm always grateful to see new articles and books or other resources that give fresh perspectives on using Tarot as Energy Mirrors rather than just for divination. I find Tarot to be a terrific tool to exercise our intuitive muscles which often go unstrengthened and unused.

Thanks for sharing this as well as links to PRS where Mitch will be giving lectures in LA next month -- I'll be there!

 BTW -- I use and teach with the Voyager Tarot deck (see Voyager's Balance card above).  It's a modern (20 year old) collage-imaged deck that's easy for many Tarot novices to connect with, created by James Wanless, Ph.D. who has also written book on Tarot and Intuition.  I also own over 80 decks and each has its own flavor, feel and insights.

If you're seeking a deck to get you started, the Ryder-Waite deck is the most common.  Most Tarot books use it as a template.  But any deck that has images you resonate with can make learning the basic structure of Tarot fun and personal. Check out decks at the Bodhi Tree (in LA) or any local metaphysical bookstore.

Barbara Schiffman, C.Ht.

Thoth Deck

I find the Aleister Crowley Deck of Thoth very beautiful and symbolic-with sacred geometry, and lovely artwork. 

However,  I used the Waite deck as I began to learn the tarot.

30th Parallel Puzzle-Box

To unlock the Pythagorean mystery hidden in Thoth's Book, One opens an Eye to the 8th Octahedron (=231)

 

Tempore patet occulta veritas...

Saturn and Earth

The Great One Of The Night and  Of Time-

 Atu- XXI

 Hebrew- Tau

 

Be still..O my soul

 As the(6) Wands are upraised

And the Aeons resolve

 

72X3= 6x6x6

 

we have come unto a palace..of which every stone is a separate jewel.. and is set with millions of moons..

The Tarot View

Someone once told me that the I Ching has a different attitude than the Tarot. After thinking about it, I decided that it must have.

In order for an oracle to serve as a conduit of information, it must assume a position with a definite set of values. Given a soup containing all information, how could anything select pertinent information without a selection mechanism such as a desired outcome or a hierarchy of values.

But I don't have desired outcomes. I do, but they are mutually exclusive. After all, I have conflicting values. Should I read another book to my child, write another page of my novel, or cook a more nutritious meal? Everything is a balancing act with many values and aspirations pulling in different directions.

Perhaps the value of the gods is that they allow us to access the soup of all information, by non-normal means, while themselves displaying an understandable set of proclivities by which we might both judge the veracity of the information provided and honor that complex of proclivities in ourselves.

I'm just tossing this out. I am struggling with the idea that oracles (or our intuitive contribution) represent a "higher self" and I wonder how such a Self could have a unitive POV, beyond pure awareness, that would allow it to select anything. I mean, pure awareness doesn't give a shit.

Anyone else examine the Tarot for signs of a personality and a set of values? What kind of personality do you think it has?

Lamp

The surprise caused by the discovery of an Egyptian book: If one proceeded to announce that there is still nowadays a work of the former Egyptians, one of their books that escaped the flames that devoured their superb libraries, and which contains their purest doctrines on interesting subjects, everyone who heard, undoubtedly, would hasten to study such an invaluable book, such a marvel. If one also said that this book is very widespread in most of Europe, that for a number of centuries it has been in the hands of everyone, the surprise would be certain to increase. Would it not reach its height, if one gave assurances that no one ever suspected that it was Egyptian; that those who possessed it did not value it, that nobody ever sought to decipher a sheet of it; that the fruit of an exquisite wisdom is regarded as a cluster of extravagant figures which do not mean anything by themselves? Would it not be thought that the speaker wanted to amuse himself, and played on the credulity of his listeners?

-Antoine Court de Gébelin

The Primitive World, analyzed and compared with the modern world, Vol. 8 (1781).

 

Thoth's book composes the Hermetic metrology utilized by our ancestors for comprehending the geometry of music in progressively HigHer dimensions.  The fortune-tellers and gamblers have provided a convenient cover. 

Tempore patet occulta veritas...

http://www.tarotforum.net/showpost.php?p=1898529&postcount=10

 

Tarot Readings

I found the article and succeeding comments wonderfully enlightening. I confess to finding the paranormal of great interest. My next novel TEA LEAVES AND TAROT CARDS makes use of tarot readings among other things. Jacqueline Seewald author of THE DROWNING POOL, Five Star/Gale 2009 THE INFERNO COLLECTION, Five Star hardcover, Wheeler large print 2008, a paranormal suspense thriller

More about the Tarot

Chimes All of the citing of historical background and types of decks and uses for the decks, etc., is a 'never-ending story,' to be sure. As a student of Tarot for over 30 years, following the ideas of the images being subconscious-alerting archetypes and combining that study with such as Ernest Holmes's writings, I have benefited from these cards and their study greatly. These studies have resulted in my newly-published volume of metaphysical poetry, Live, From the Mystic (for info, please visit http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/LiveFromtheMystic.html). The poems are a celebration of the unity, beauty and joy to be found in nature, in relationship. The cards' history is indeed intriguing; what can be achieved with their use, in terms of personal growth, is amazing.

The Tarot Again

Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University gives us this view:

Cartomancy

The first playing cards used for fortune telling were simply standard ones read in conjunction with the c. 1505 Mainz Kartenlosbuch (literally, card-fortune book). This work is the earliest surviving printed evidence linking playing cards with carto¬mancy. Cards made specifically for divination first appeared in the seventeenth century, with the English c. 1670 Fortune-telling Cards. John Lenthall's c. 1717 edition of this pack is part if the Cary Collection (ENG 36). The Fortune-telling Cards use the standard French suit system in a pack of fifty-two cards. The aces and court cards bear zodiacal signs and images of historical and mythical figures such as Ptolemy and Merlin; the actual fortunes are listed on the pip cards. The eighteenth century witnessed Court de Gébelin's mystical interpretation, Le monde primitif (Paris, 1773), of the Latin/Italian-suited tarot. Gébelin saw the standard trumps of the tarot as hieroglyphs and thus gave birth to the customary, if entirely inaccurate, identification of the tarot pack with fortune telling. Gébelin's ideas caught the public fancy and gave rise to contrasting occultist readings of the pack, notably that of the barber and wigmaker Alliette, who published under the name Etteilla.

Yours sincerely Samten de Wet

Why I Try Tarot

I signed up for a Tarot reading class in a wonderful shop called the Oracle in Whistler B.C. The person who took my name seemed not at all interested in my $50 for the class but more about screening me out. She asked why I wanted to read Tarot. I explained to her, I have 3 sons and before they are teenagers I would like to have honed more clarvoyance. She smiled shrewedly and said - that's a damn good reason. And truely, I meant it! I feel there are not enough moments in my day to day life to really practice clarvoyance or even basic knowing. There are many options to feel your own soul in daily ritual but to connect with someone else in their spritiual path is a blessed gift. Hurray for Tarot!