Psychophysics in Sebastapol and SF

spiralsm.jpg

I will be in Sepastapol tomorrow night and SF the night after, giving talks with my friend Jamie Janover. If you either live nearby or are capable of bi-locating, I hope you will come and join us. 

• Tues. Jan 27 - Sebastopol, CA w/ Daniel Pinchbeck & Jamie Janover @ Subud Hall
234 Hutchins Ave., Sebastopol, CA, 95472
7-10PM
$25

• Wed. Jan 28 - San Francisco, CA w/ Daniel Pinchbeck & Jamie Janover @ Bus Stop Gallery
135 Dore St. SF, CA
7-10 PM
$25

Have you ever wondered about how the universe actually works? How we fit in? How everything really is "All One" WITHOUT having to think of it with those silly quotes around it? I certainly have... So when I first saw scientist Nassim Haramein speak I was totally blown away. He actually was able to tie together everything into one cohesive unification theory. I mean EVERYTHING - from cosmology to quantum mechanics, sacred geometry, ancient cultures, crop circles, religious texts, Einstein's relativistic theories (with an added spin component) and even the nature of consciousness....

Learn about Nassim Haramein’s lifelong journey into the geometry of spacetime, which has lead to a coherent understanding of the fundamental structure of the universe and our existence in it. In this presentation, I will take you on a journey through humanity’s evolution, exposing the changes necessary to produce a Unified Physics; a unification of not only the four forces of nature, but also evolution and the occurrence of consciousness. Haramein's theory demonstrates as well a parallel between ancient codes in documents and monuments.

This all-encompassing theory may prove to be one of the most important discoveries of our time.

Joining me for these presentations is a special guest, author Daniel Pinchbeck. Daniel is the author of Breaking Open the Head: A Psychedelic Journey into the Heart of Contemporary Shamanism. In Breaking Open the Head, Pinchbeck explored shamanism via ceremonies with tribal groups such as the Bwiti of Gabon, who eat iboga, and the Secoya people in the Ecuadorean Amazon, who take ayahuasca in their ceremonies. He also attended the Burning Man festival in Nevada, and looked at use of psychedelic substances in a desacralized modern context. Through his direct experiences and research, and influenced heavily by the work of anthroposophist Rudolf Steiner, he became convinced that the shamanic and mystical view of reality had validity, and that the modern world had forfeited an understanding of intuitive aspects of being in its pursuit of rational materialism.

This awareness led to his second book, 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl, which examines prophecy through personal and philosophical approaches, and offers the hypothesis that humanity is experiencing an accelerated process of global consciousness transformation, leading to a new realization of time and space during this period. In 2012, he also explains the psi or extra-sensory perception research of Dean Radin, the theories of Graham Hancock, his own encounters with crop circles, a visit to calendar reform advocate José Argüelles, and his direct reception of prophetic material: the voice of the Mesoamerican deity Quetzalcoatl, began speaking to him during a 2004 trip to the Amazon in Brazil. At the time, he was participating in a ceremony of the Santo Daime, a Brazilian religion that uses the psychedelic brew ayahuasca as its sacrament.

Image: "Supermassive black hole eating matter" by thebadastronomer on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing.

Comments

Haramein, Hoagland and hyper-dimensional physics

Not many mainstream physicists today support Nassim Haramein's views---first proposed in an earlier generation by Richard Hoagland.

But I find it interesting that the most fundamental symbol from his theory---a double tetrahedron---appeared in European crop pictures last summer twice, whether in Germany or England: www.cropcircleconnector.com/anasazi/time2007s.html

At Oliver's Castle, there was even a "river-like flow of three streams meeting and swirling into each other, as if to form a clockwise vortex": see comments by Janet Ossebaard on www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/oliverscastle/oliverscastle2008a.html

All of those features are hallmarks of Haramein's theories. We seem to be getting it right out of the horse's mouth, and not from some dusty textbook. Anyone who has not seen these striking field pictures before should take a look, and be stunned. Nearby in Germany on the same night, there appeared the classic symbol of Quetzalcoatl: www.cropcircleconnector.com/inter2008/germany2008.html

Doesn't anyone realize...

that Hoagland is a news commentator which is equivalent to a Sophist and that NH has used the 19.5 degree paradigm to materialize a rather posh estate in Hawaii? I do believe currently accepted physics is flawed, but whats been published so far by the Resonance Project is a bit off as well although maybe a tad closer to the truth. The double tetrahedron thing is bs since tetrahedrons are imploded octahedrons, its just a symbol to get more money, even the Resonance project web page shows Fuller's vector equilibrium, but hey that's been used so lets find a new symbol, see what I mean? Who do they think they are, the Dharma Initiative?

how so?

vivi,

what discrepancies do you find with the research done by the resonance project and what do you feel the "truth" is regarding revisionist physics?

Caveat emptor

Nassim and his work seems to be very controversial.  Jamie's visit to Chicago recently stirred up an interesting rush of debate, even before the event happened.

Caveat emptor...

elaborate...

Just curious what the controversy was about?

-st

Good to see what everyone is thinking!

Those ad hominem attacks on Hoagland or Haramein go a long way to show what everyone is thinking!

I heard from a friend that Hoagland was the single most unpopular speaker at Chet Snow's recent meeting in Arizona. Who cares? Likewise, does anyone really care whether Haramein lives in a big house or a small one?

What we should be concerned about is the novel theory that energy may be flowing into our universe from other dimensions: not just once long ago as for a 'Big Bang', but still today as an ongoing process.

Fred Hoyle published a similar theory in Nature forty years ago, where he argued that the masses of subatomic particles might be evolving over time. Eddington in 1930 thought that spiral galaxies might be "energy poured into our universe from other dimensions".

Finally, were we being taught certain aspects of that novel theory in two crop pictures last summer, that remain otherwise unexplained?

Might the higher intelligences who drew such pictures regard us as somewhat dim: like biologists on Earth before Darwin, or geologists before Wegener?

according to Jadczyk

"We point out that the equations underlying Evans' theory are highly problematic. Moreover, we demonstrate that the so-called ``spin connection resonance'', predicted by Evans, cannot be derived from the equation he used. We provide an exact solution of Evans' corresponding equation and show that is has definitely no resonance solutions." All the resonance projects links to real physic are dependent on Evan's conjecture and the proof used by Jadczyk irrefutably proves that there are no resonance solutions.

Psychohistory, Kairacity and Occam's cricket paddle...

In his great scifi masterpiece "The Foundation Trilogy," Asimov introduces the concept of a predictive social science known as psychohistory which is able to map the future course of society within certain parameters but is subject to derailment by truly novel occurences. Karacity is a philosophy presented by contemporary academic E.A Moutspoulos regarding opportune timing of innovation for the purpose of showmanship when aimed toward the common good. Occam's cricket paddle is my made up notion of how when smacked in the head by a completely arbitrary relationship between concepts the mass mind eventually submits and confirms w/ great glee a shining synchronicity where none exists without regard to personal, social, or ecological good or evil. If you can read in between my lines the reference to Piltdown man and wavelets in Hilbert space and Minkowski, then maybe there is hope for your paper mache volcano...

The theory of Evans: interesting but relevant?

One comment above quotes from Bruhn, Hehl and Jadczyk in Acta Physica Polonica B, volume 39, pages 51-58, 2008, "Comments on spin connection resonance in general relativity".

That paper criticizes an implausible theory proposed by Myron Evans. The mathematical formalisms of both that theory and its criticisms seem so obscure, that not many people will be able to understand what the argument is about.

Is this subject really relevant to Daniel's new 2012 book? Perhaps we should discuss Haramein's ideas instead? Or how the basic symbol for his unusual theory appeared twice last summer in English or German crop pictures, that were not apparently human-made?

In other words, is someone trying to tell us something? Are we being shown extra-terrestrial physics in the fields? Prior to 1900, every academic physicist on Earth would have denied quantum mechanics, as well as "atoms".

3d crop circle?

The basic symbol or propaganda banner? In 2d could be an octahedron, star of David, many choices. The term for not understanding an argument is ignorance and should not be lauded as acceptable.I guess by formalism you mean science rather than rhetoric. If a scientist can't get his sums right he/she should stick to Philosophy and call it that and not put on some false front. If someone/thing was trying to tell anybody anything it should be don't be such an Unmensch and stop at that. Saluting every jockstrap that gets run up the flagpole just because it flaps nicely in the breeze doesn't make it a symbol of pride.

Physical reality versus abstract mathematics

What I meant is that we should concern ourselves with physical reality (our human understanding of nature, which is always changing), rather than with abstract mathematics.

Mathematical abstractions are one way of understanding nature, but certainly not the only way. Before 1950, for example, abstract geneticists developed highly mathematical schemes for inheritance, without even knowing about DNA! Most of them thought proteins were the "gene". After the structure and functions of DNA were worked out in some detail, the basic principles of inheritance became so simple that they could be taught in grade school.

Physics today is still at that abstract, preliminary stage of development. No one on Earth today understands inertia, gravity, the fine structure constant, or many other important things like that.

Hence it would not be surprising (to me at least) if visitors from another star system, or another spacetime entirely, knew a little more than us!

If however one chooses to deny all of the many overt manifestations of e.t. visitation since 1950---UFOs, abductions, contacts, crop pictures, etc.---then it becomes a matter of epistemology (how do we know what we know?) and not science.

People like Daniel Pinchbeck and Nassim Haramein are certainly not working within (or adhering to) any closed system of thought within modern academia, but who cares? Do the academics define "right" and "wrong" for us? Perhaps they do for some people, but then I am not a sheep.

your polemic is false...

all reality is second hand and the abstract of mathematics makes no claim on definition of reality and is useful by means of its coherent structure that enables the structured analysis of observation into coherent and predictable systems. I see one who proposes the preposterous over the likely as a wolf in sheeps clothing who's goal is to manipulate the ignorant.

Evolution Beyond Darwin 200

EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200 I. At Darwin 200 Darwin Extended Beyond His Own Horizon Rethought Unified Field Theory And Evolution A. SN Special : Darwin turns 200 http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/39754/title/SN_Special__Darwi... This special web edition of Science News includes expanded versions of articles from the magazine's print edition plus two additional features, all commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin. B. 22nd Century Conception Of Unified Field Theory And Evolution The following brief essays present the 22nd century comprehension of evolution. They preserve Darwin's name in reference to Life Evolution in respect and appreciation of Darwin's promotion of the concept of evolution in life. Life's Manifest http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578 Culture, A Ubiquitous Biological Entity http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/98.page Life And Darwinian Evolution, 21st Century Comprehension http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page Rethink Unified Field Theory And Evolution http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#982 II. Evolution beyond Darwin 200 Per "Design And Randomness In Cosmic And Life Evolution" http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=404 Singularity and D-Infinity (max expansion, energy dilution) are the cosmic end states. Their in-between is a metastable state. This corresponds to commonsense observation: the denser the compacting goal of material the more energy is required, and vice versa the more thorough the disintegration of material the higher the amount of energy released. It seems that the cosmic universal process is E=Total[m(1+D)] , where D is the Distance from Big Bang point and the sum is of all spatial values of D from D=0 to D=selected value. Presently the cosmos expands on the right side of the equation. However, within its accelerating overall energy dilution there are local phenomena of formation of temporarily constrained energy pockets that evolve backwords towards impansion. The two most obvious examples of such backword energy constraints are black holes and life, two distant relatives within a probably big family of various forms of cosmic 'backlash energy constraints'. Suggesting, Dov Henis (Comments From The 22nd Century) http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1