Left in the Dark: The Origins of our Species-Wide Insanity

wrightcover.jpg

 

The following article originally appeared on Brainwaving.com.

While a student at Edinburgh Botanic Gardens and preparing a short dissertation entitled ‘The Genetic Manipulation of Plants' the subconscious seeds of a revolutionary new theory were sown in Tony Wright's mind. Over the next 20 years a mixture of scientific curiosity and radical self-experimentation resulted in the development of a simple idea that explains the emergence of increasingly anomalous traits in human evolution. From the rapid and accelerating expansion of our large brain to the mysteries of our mind and the origins of spiritual practice he has developed a new context in which we may understand who we are and has provided a framework for the reunification of the academic and spiritual science of consciousness. Working independently and alone, the fruits of his labour are only now beginning to reach a wider audience through the recent publication of Left in the Dark: The Biological Origins of the Fall from Grace. Despite the major practical and philosophical implications initial reaction has been exceptionally favourable. Tony is now focused on bringing this modern translation of very ancient wisdom into mainstream culture in the hope that it may help provide a way out of the self-imposed madness we currently mistake as normality.

 

Consciousness and the Direction of Structure

 

Your ability to read and understand this article, your perception, state of mind and sense of self is directly related to the co-ordinated real time variations in structure and cascading flood of chemical and electrical chain reactions in your brain. That is not to say your consciousness is the structure, rather one facilitates the other. Forget for now the so-called hard problem, how does consciousness arise or emerge from a large glob of fatty stuff, or the esoteric realms of physics where the nature of matter and energy is indeterminate. Let us begin with a model based on the concept of structure, in this case the microstructure and molecular arrangement of our brain as an understanding at this level may shed light on some of the more esoteric mysteries.

A single brain cell is more complex by many orders than anything most of us have ever imagined, a comparison with the best of our technology would be laughable. Sub atomic, atomic and molecular engineering of extraordinary elegance, a whole dynamic ecosystem in constant yet precisely orchestrated flux.

Take around 100 billion or so of these supremely advanced organic machines and organise them into a coherent interconnected and self-regulating whole and we have the human brain. It manages its biological support systems, processes and translates sensory input into something comprehensible and appears to give rise to or at least facilitate a sense of ‘I'. The correlation between structure and function is very good, the tiniest change in its structure can and usually does result in major changes in our sense of who or what we are. From congenital defects in the developmental process to minor accidents as small as a pinprick through to the use of appropriately termed mind altering molecules the result is always the same, micro change in structure, macro change in consciousness. So for this model to develop we will assume the brain acts like a lens for our sense of self or consciousness. The arrangement of the molecular architecture directly relates to its resolution or the quality of consciousness in the same way the design and structural integrity of a telescope lens and mirror relates to its ability to resolve light and the sharpness of the image it produces.

If we take the lens analogy as read it would be useful to look at its design and how it evolved and developed. Not quite the current paradigm re human evolution rather a modern translation of an earlier paradigm when somewhat circuitously the theory outlined below predicts the archaic traditions on which it is based would be more accurate than much of what is currently in vogue. So sit back and enjoy the ride and lets see if it correlates with the world you inhabit or whether it offers any practical insights as to where we go next....

Expansion

During the latter stages of its evolution the human brain was on a rapid and accelerating curve of expansion. This exceptionally rare phenomenon was the by-product of an increasingly symbiotic and co-evolutionary relationship with flowering plants that resulted in the emergence of a number of unusual traits. These traits were the direct consequence of a heavily and progressively modified transcription environment at all stages of growth and development. Rather than selective adaptation working on DNA mutation the primary mechanism was a form of genetic engineering or more accurately epigenetic engineering. The increasing dependence on a bio-chemically complex diet, very rich in transcription altering, endocrine disrupting and neuro-active flavonoids drove the expansion of the brain. As the brain enlarged and its fuel requirement disproportionally increased the expansion cocktail was liberally laced with simple sugars. In order to meet its appetite for fuel it was compelled to ingest ever-greater amounts of the chemicals that were responsible for its growth in the first place.

New structure

The tumour-like proliferation of the new brain, the neo-cortex, increasingly freed from the constraints of specialised differentiation and survival related function took a quantum leap in its development. It had acquired highly advanced cognitive abilities and begun acting as an executive layer with built in automatic enhancing capabilities for earlier more primitive neural structures. It had also reached sufficient complexity to experience self recognition, not the self we ‘think' we are today, rather a self we would now describe as something wholly other. In addition and related to its self recognition capacity its experience of itself could be described in terms of rapture, a perpetual sense of profound wonder and intense sensual joy.

Contraction

Then around two hundred thousand years ago the rapid expansion of our brain abruptly stalled and turned to contraction. The huge reduction and near loss of the wet tropical forests during the driest period of the last ice age pulled the plug on the fomenting cauldron of chemicals that had been responsible for re-designing, re-organising and re-engineering the evolutionary development of our brain. When the last of our lineage were ejected from the forest's womb-like protection that had hot housed our evolution, the neural system it had nurtured was exposed to the kinds of hostile ecological and biochemical environments it had not encountered for millions of years. The physiological traits that had emerged and were dependent on a heavily modified transcription environment inevitably began to regress.

Catastrophic failure

Since that time our brain has suffered a progressive and catastrophic failure in its development, massive loss of its structural integrity at a molecular and cellular level and near total loss of the most complex biochemical cocktail in evolutionary history essential for its optimum function. Archaic genetic specialisation asymmetrically encoded between the cerebral hemispheres resulted in the predisposition of one side of the brain to fail more quickly than the other. Paradoxically as the developmental retardation progressed the more retarded side assumed control, its greater loss of function and the associated psychology of fear provided the drive to dominate. Finally as sex steroids such as testosterone are fundamental in brain development and the evolutionary effect of flavonoids significantly modified their activity the severity of the symptoms is gender related with males exhibiting a more extreme spectrum of symptoms than females.

Ancient treatment

Our ancestors being significantly more functional than we are, were acutely aware of their predicament. They developed a number of ingenious practices and techniques in an attempt to treat the emerging symptoms of their neurodegenerative disease and slow its rate of progression. Through the insight of their minds alone they achieved a high science of consciousness now largely forgotten and dismissed as the mythological ramblings of our ‘primitive' forebears. They were faced with a condition so insidious it is difficult for us to imagine, symptoms include the inability to accurately perceive reality and a progressive blindness to the nature and severity of the condition itself. Ultimately their best efforts failed, though the relics of their treatments can offer a powerful insight into the specific nature of the condition when considered within a neurological framework.

The lights went out, there is no one home

From the most advanced consciousness system this side of the Milky Way the human brain has been reduced to a zombie like state, unable to recognise itself, paralysed by a profound sense of paranoia, plagued by deeply rooted psychosis and driven to control anything beyond its rapidly diminishing experiential capacity. In the most recent and severe period of degeneration, what we now refer to as recorded history (a necessary response to the failure of our eidetic memory) it has created a world in its own demented image. The stratification of society along neurodegenerative lines resulted in the emergence of hierarchical and patriarchal structures that reward delusion and dysfunction with power and control. This has further accelerated our plunge into a culture dominated by fear where the least functional members of society inevitably end up creating a world that reflects their underlying dysfunction. Ironically labelled civilisation, built on foundations of deep psychosis, devoid of reality, empathy or any sense of beingness, a living hell where only the deluded sense of being in control at any cost provides temporary respite from the self inflicted nightmare.

 

Examples of catastrophic structural failure: Design and development, real time function, build quality

1. Congenital development and design specification: The earliest phase of neural development is the most crucial, the highly sensitive neural cells are at their most responsive and plastic. The foundations for lifelong neural structure, organisation and function are laid down during specific developmental windows in the first few weeks and months of our life. While our brain maintains much more plasticity much later in life than previously thought the way the brain develops during these key windows is a very significant factor in permanently shaping its functional parameters.

The design for this period of development is locked in the DNA blueprint and like all blueprints it needs to be read. A major part of this mechanism is hormonal, the translation of the genetic blueprint into molecular and neurological structure depends on the complex interaction of many hormonally active chemicals. These chemicals play a direct role in dictating the timing and duration of the developmental windows as well as what happens at a structural level within each window.

Recent research has identified a number of chemicals that are known to interfere with this natural process. Generally termed endocrine disrupters they can alter the period of developmental windows and what happens during those windows by interfering with the activity of hormones integral to or by acting directly on the transcription process.

Chemicals found in plastics or pesticide residues have been identified as potentially dangerous endocrine disrupters and recommendations to limit their effect particularly during early development have been implemented.

Interestingly enough flavonoids have also been designated endocrine disrupters and the potentially harmful effects of flavonoids in Soya infant formula have been the subject of serious investigation.

So while the design for our brain and all aspects of our physical form are encoded in the genetic blueprint the final structure is dictated by the precise cocktail of chemicals in the developmental environment.

A powerful mix of endocrine disrupting flavonoids was known to be an integral part of our transcription environment for many millions of years. They influenced the molecular and cellular structure of our brain so inevitably altered our state of mind. Those designer drugs are now almost entirely absent during our neural development, the consequence cannot be anything other than the congenital malformation of our brain.

2. Microtubules: Generally considered part of the cells skeleton these supremely delicate and complex structures are increasingly associated with cognition and intelligence particularly in neural cells where they are especially abundant, some theories even suggest a central role in higher consciousness. Either way like most biological structures, their precise design and molecular arrangement is dictated by DNA. However they display a very high level of plasticity in response to their biochemical environment, an excellent example of real time hormonal and chemical effect on the transcription, configuration and functionality of structures directly related to cognition and consciousness. For example a minor change in the cellular concentration of the neuro-active hormone melatonin will radically alter the structure of these extraordinary intelligence-related machines. Is it any wonder that the near total loss of the complex and hormonally active chemicals present and essential during the evolution and development of our brain has left the most delicate and hormonally sensitive parts of our consciousness system twisted and distorted literally out of all recognition.

3. Super structure: A major structural and functional component in the central, peripheral and enteric nervous system as well as cell membranes are fatty acids. A class of highly volatile, incredibly delicate, long-chain molecules that are extremely susceptible to oxidative degeneration. In nature they are always very heavily protected, wrapped up and immersed in a cocktail of powerful anti-oxidants which is very handy and no accident. Retaining them in their protective matrix at a molecular level until they are assimilated and incorporated into the neural and cellular structures is absolutely essential to prevent damage.

The expansion of the human brain to its colossal proportions presents a major engineering headache in simply protecting such a volatile mass from rapid degeneration. To meet this requirement biological pumps maintain a concentration of vitamin C in the brain to a level 100 times higher than that of blood. In addition the pineal gland pumps out the neuro-active hormone melatonin, as an antioxidant it is around 50 times more effective than vitamin C. As yet an unrecognised part of the evolutionary equation are the powerful antioxidant activities of flavonoids. Increasingly studied in isolation or as part of our typical dietary intake and slowly creeping into nutritional recommendations or offered as supplements they also have more protective action than vitamin C.

Here is the paradox, flavonoids were known to be present along with the more familiar protective vitamins as part of our evolutionary diet at levels at least 20 times higher than what is currently considered normal. A perpetual flood of 1000s of anti-oxidant compounds present 24/7 from conception to death. This constant immersion in a highly protective chemical soup was absolutely essential to prevent the most complex feat of molecular engineering we know, constructed from some of the most delicate and highly volatile molecules we know, from structural and functional degeneration. As a bonus some groups of flavonoids also elevate the production of melatonin by stimulating the activity of the pineal.

Check it out for yourself, our nearest living relatives the forest dwelling apes currently, today and everyday flood their system with at least 20 times more of these antioxidants than we do and we have a proportionally much larger and therefore more vulnerable brain. Now we have lost virtually all that protection, at least a 95% deficiency, in fact its more like 98% and it's the reason why it takes a while for the implications to sink in... In addition we are chronically deficient in fatty acids the raw construction materials for the neural systems super structure, finally we tend to separate them from their natural protection, then heat them to extremely high temperatures in oxygen before incorporating them into the structural integrity of our brain.

Now pay attention, you might have to read this again and again and again to begin to understand the catastrophic failure at a molecular level this represents. Not only is it profoundly shocking, it certainly should be, your ability to assimilate this information is seriously compromised by severe neurodegenerative dementia, whatever your age. What we currently define as dementia and Alzheimer's are simply the inevitable and extreme ends of a spectrum of life long neuro-degeneration due to the near total loss of functional and protective biochemistry.

How would our ‘advanced' engineering fare in similar circumstances?

Applying these principles to modern feats of engineering can provide a basic understanding regarding the impact of minute changes in basic specification. For example instructing the research and development team at a major engineering corporation to add 1% to the blueprints design dimensions, to reduce the quality of the construction materials by 5% and to vary the fuel quality or power supply by 10%.

If you applied these specification changes to some of the most advanced technology the human mind has created then you begin to get the idea. Take any of the following examples of ‘advanced' engineering, Concorde, The Northrop Grumman B-2 Stealth bomber, The Space Shuttle, The large Hadron Collider or The Hubble Telescope. Such a change in specifications would likely render their construction impossible, even if construction were possible the idea that they would work would be reasonable grounds for being institutionalised. Apply the same parameters to more basic technology such as your car or personal computer and the outcome would be the same. You might just get away with building or at least shoehorning your car together, it might even start but would you drive it if you knew about the changes in specification?

Everyday life and death decisions are made on behalf of millions of people based on the untested presumption that the most complex piece of engineering we know is even remotely functional. You might think that the basic scientific protocol of never presuming your primary instrument of investigation is working would be applied to the one piece of equipment we use for absolutely everything. Perhaps its flawless performance throughout recent history has provided us with the confidence to ignore what would be considered 'bad science' in any other context.

The accepted evidence for the structural basis of our insanity is staring us in the face, as might be expected we fail to recognise its profound significance.

The complexities of the human brain are so far beyond our current thinking we really have no idea how it works. What we do know is that our own sex steroids such as testosterone play a major role in all aspects of neural development. In addition through testosterone's conversion to estradiol via the enzyme aromatase it is also responsible for the masculinization of the brain. Strangely enough this ‘normal' process is known to retard its development in the uterus by modifying the way DNA is transcribed, in turn changing its molecular and cellular structure with testosterone referred to as a neuro-toxin. Cambridge based researcher Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, building on findings dating back 20 years or more has concluded that the ‘normal' male brain is simply at one end of the spectrum of ASD due to the effects of hormonal retardation. Of course the reference point for normal is based on the presumption that the activity of our sex hormones is normal.

We also know that for the greater part of its evolution the human brain was immersed in a chemical cocktail that inhibited and diluted the action of our own sex steroids as well as the action of the enzyme aromatase. It is inevitable that the near complete loss of these inhibitory effects has radically altered the development of our brain and therefore our state of mind. The very acceptance of ‘retardation' as normal within the context of a recently expanding brain that is now shrinking would be cause for great concern if it were a modern hi tech engineering project. These two pieces of the evolutionary jigsaw alone should set alarm bells ringing as they are well evidenced and accepted, that they don't is a direct consequence of the hormonal retardation on our minds ability to see context. That we now build the most complex product of biological evolution from materials that have never been part of that 3 billion year process might be another. The very simple equation above should be enough on its own to initiate the kind of response when we are faced with a massive natural disaster, what is your response?

 

Discover how astounding you really are: A short exercise to re-calibrate your perception

Before pondering the pictorial summary (link below), watch this excerpt from a recent animation that provides just a hint of the unimaginable dynamic complexity that you are (full-length version with narrative here). Do not buy into your perceptually limited mind telling you ‘this is just what happens in my cells'. Although near the cutting edge of biological animation and still a relatively crude representation of the molecular biology that you are in action, right now, it does begin to reveal what extraordinarily complex beings we are, divine poetry in molecular motion.

Watch it a couple of times and allow yourself to imagine that this is what you are, then multiply the molecular and cellular complexity and transpose that to the structures that play a major role in facilitating our sense of self, our neural cells, when watching this very simple animation.

Now imagine the aqueous environment in which all this highly sensitive and interactive molecular machinery depends on being completely flooded with extremely reactive biochemistry. The most complex biochemical cocktail in evolutionary history also produced by equally complex molecular machines in one almighty orchestrated molecular dance.

Finally once you to begin to recognise how extraordinarily complex your evolutionary process is,  then take a look at the pictorial summary here, and try to see way beyond the ‘trees' the ‘humans' the ‘fruit' etc and imagine a single interconnected molecular organism.

While your brain was evolving it was effectively an extension of the most complex ecosystem we know. Scale that into molecular ecology that involved the plant chemistry reading our DNA and directly modifying the evolution and development of our mind and you begin to realise that we were not and could not be fully functioning once we were chemically separated.

 

Conclusion

Minutely modifying the molecular structure or chemical cocktail of our brain radically changes our sense of self, our psychology and behaviour, how we perceive and react to each other and the world we create and inhabit. We have recently had our brain structure and neurochemistry massively and detrimentally altered so inevitably our state of mind and sense of self has also massively and detrimentally altered. An accurate account of the catastrophic failure of our consciousness system is preserved in ancient mythology, a diagnosis of a progressive neurodegenerative condition that results in severe and all encompassing psychotic delusion. Evidence from several modern scientific disciplines supports the ancient accounts and provides compelling evidence of species wide hormonal ‘retardation' of our brain and associated dysfunction.

Expecting to address the serious perceptual and psychological deficiencies that have resulted without addressing the underlying structural damage and neuro-chemical deficiencies is utterly futile and symptomatic of the condition itself. All that is required to restore our sanity is to repair the precise molecular structure and restore the neuro-chemical regime that is absolutely essential to perceive reality. This is already well within our reach and with a common sense approach likely to yield spectacular results within a generation. While we may be less aware than our ancestors we have the potential to mobilise the industrial scale technologies and bio-sciences we have invented and currently deploy to wage war on our selves or provide distraction with endless plastic shit. It might be fitting to turn these machines of destruction built on the broken backs and broken spirits of millions of lives and lost generations to creating something other than quiet desperation for a tiny minority and abject misery for everyone else. Even a partial fix is likely to yield a profound improvement in our mental health and bring with it the cognitive capacity to effect a complete restoration. Prioritising anything other than the immediate structural repair of our mind simply highlights how far we have fallen into the abyss of our own insanity.

It may all seem just a little challenging yet a solution would take a fraction of the colossal effort and resource wasted every single day in maintaining the unsustainable and destructive systems of control and the mindless consumer societies we all inadvertently support. Of course it would simply not be tenable to propose such a catastrophic failure if there were not an overwhelming body of evidence to support it. Aside from ‘hard' evidence that would have to exist in the biological sciences it would require no more than reading a newspaper on any day you like to see the scale and depth of perceptual and psychological symptoms or if you are really brave just look in the mirror.

This modern translation of the ancient science of the mind was brought to you courtesy of a partially retrofitted and rebuilt neural system, repeated periods of cerebral dominance reversal and the treatment of chronic and clinical deficiency in neurochemistry via frequent self medication and supplementation with neuro-chemical analogues.

For more information visit leftinthedark.org.uk
and beyond-belief.org.uk or read ‘Left in the Dark' and find explanations to long standing enigmas such as ‘why very big brains really do grow on trees.'

For initial references, click here.

Listen to this interview with Tony on Radio New Zealand National.

 

Comments

OH MY GOD ! ! !

      This is one of the funniest articles I have ever read on RS! “Hat’s off” to those who decided to include this one! I just can’t wait for the more creative comments to start piling up! Here’s my very first impression: I’m reading… I’m reading… I’m laughing out loud…

      In this age of Attention Deficit Disorder it seems the only way to get someone's attention is to shout! Or use superlatives that are way… way beyond the ordinary descriptive threshold. You see it happen every day on the news: “FOX News Analyst’s Hannady And Colms Murder MSNBC News Counterparts Olberman And Maddow Last Night ON LIVE TV And In COLD BLOOD!” Oh, dear! Have they had another disagreement?

      So, I’m reading and I’m laughing, and I’m waiting for the punch line; you know the anticipated advertisement at the end of the rant that guarantees a solution to the Armageddon just outlined in all its gruesome detail… AND THERE IT WAS!!!

      “This modern translation of the ancient science of the mind was brought to you courtesy of a partially retrofitted and rebuilt neural system, repeated periods of cerebral dominance reversal and the treatment of chronic and clinical deficiency in neurochemistry via frequent self medication and supplementation with neuro-chemical analogues.”

      Okay, now all I have to do is find their website. GOD only knows what might happen to what I used to think of as my healthy brain if I wait another minute longer!!!

      I’d better hurry befor ail my brins trun itno Jeloo. Oh, Siht! IS’T TUO LTAE ! ! !

 

 

good humor

I am glad the first comment up here saw through the veil. So interesting that people will simply believe this because it fits in with their pre-existing beliefs systems. 

OMG

Hi Leon, thanks for your comment, I’m impressed at your confidence re the possession a ‘healthy brain’

Contrasting the two perspectives should be interesting, maybe even fun.

My recent subjective certainty that my neural system is compromised through congenital injury that left me almost perceptually blind to the perceptual symptoms of that injury raises some intriguing questions. No doubt you have figured that out already as you would have the perceptual advantage. Suppose I’m wrong, where does that leave me, how could I be wrong if I am neurologically/psychologically functioning. If I’m right and neurologically/psychologically compromised then unless the condition is unique to me or very rare there will be no widespread evidence/symptoms of a similar condition.

Your subjective certainty that you are neurologically/perceptually functional also raises some intriguing questions. I’m curious to know how have you reached that conclusion? I confess a lack of trust in my ‘normal’ (left brain dominant) subjective perception so I took a look at the data on neurological development and function, particularly in regard to the perceptually dominant side of the human brain. Now it may be a further indication of my subjective perceptual limitations but the data seems to indicate some very serious flaws. I would be very interested in your opinion, there are a few examples of the data via the ‘For initial references, click here’ just below the article.

It seems to me that the ‘normal’ functioning of the perceptually dominant hemisphere would require ‘shouting’ ‘ Or use superlatives that are way… way beyond the ordinary descriptive threshold’ to draw its attention to something it did not want to look at, again I would be very interested in your opinion re the data.

More generally the idea that a neurologically/psychologically functional society would not already have in place a rigorous and regular self-diagnostics re our neural system is a bit perplexing (to me). The proposal that even the remotest possibility of a glitch in our neurological system and that the idea of a rigorous self-diagnostic would be met with dismissal, derision or hostility rather than being warmly welcomed as a non threatening no-brainer of a sane idea is also a bit perplexing. I have some doubt that the idea of a regular and thorough diagnostic for the flight management computer on a Boeing 747 would illicit the same kind of response, even if you were a passenger in the departure lounge let alone piloting it. That of course would go way way beyond the computers self diagnostics program reporting that all was well…

In a neurologically/psychologically functional society the proposal of serious species wide dysfunction would (by definition) attract almost no significant support. If you can explain the paradox of mutually incompatible reactions better than the split brain data I have cited (as it does predict such diametrically opposed views as part of the underlying dysfunction) then I would be very interested. I can’t quite see how such a phenomena could be accounted for if neurological/psychological function is generally prevalent.
These comments below seem to suggest that in your opinion not everyone is neurologically/psychologically functional.
“Hat’s off” to those who decided to include this one!’
‘I just can’t wait for the more creative comments to start piling up!’
‘In this age of Attention Deficit Disorder’
‘You see it happen every day on the news:’


Also re your mention of Armageddon (a bit of a cliché perhaps though with many many layers). Please explain in context the construction and continued existence right now of more than 20,000 nuclear warheads. Bear in mind that they have almost been deployed en-mass on at least two occasions in the last 50 years that we have been made aware of despite the known Mutually Assured Destruction scenarios so well researched by our neurologically/psychologically functional representatives. If you can reach a sane conclusion re the culmination of the industrial and technological brilliance of our civilisation after all of our primitive history with out such a wondrous achievement, then you are certainly a lot wiser than I am.

As for ‘a solution to the Armageddon just outlined in all its gruesome detail’ attempting no doubt crudely to restore the factory settings re the unique molecular ecology that was allegedly present during the evolution and development of the human brain. Then looking to see if the most complex chemically sensitive organ we know of behaves any differently is a very basic engineering approach. Perhaps the idea that such factors would affect the development and functioning of the human brain/mind is part of my compromised thinking?

Reply to OMG

      I apologize in advance that my response will not be as composed as I would like due to my lack of interest in this exercise. Your thesis is simply preposterous to me, and I find it very difficult to take seriously (with one exception I will outline at the end of my response). Furthermore, I’m not inclined to investigate your data further, but I appreciate your reply to my comment, and your offer with the link you provided. Please forgive my ambivalence here.

      In my opinion we perform routine diagnostics during the night, where we spend roughly one third of our lives. Observations by Freud and Jung, and more recent studies in lucid dreaming (see, for instance, the book Lucid Dreaming by Robert Waggoner) suggest such is the case, but I feel that a consensus for my opinion will take many years of further research by others, who unlike myself, have finished high school..

      I do not doubt that a snapshot of current human behavior is suggestive of pathological dysfunction. Nor do I doubt that an imbalance in hemispherical cohesion may be pointed to as a possible link. In fact, my theory is that at some point in our near future this hemispherical imbalance will be corrected, perhaps by an event involving our near extinction. Such a stressful event, in my opinion, has the potential to cause a bifurcation in consciousness resulting in a Metanoic mutation that could be considered a spontaneous evolutionary event. Such Metanoia should contain the momentum necessary to catapult our species on a trajectory toward eventual survival and prosperity the likes of which we can now only dream.

      While my theory may rub you in a similar way that yours does me, for you to suggest that your snapshot, or single-frame video capture of humanity’s current state of insanity can be extrapolated from this overly produced movie-thesis in your head, which has as its plot the degeneration of the capabilities of the brain by malnourishment is, for me at least, just a bridge too far.

      Your studies have obviously led you to this place of cascading degeneration, while mine have led me to believe that humanity is following a generally natural flow toward the advancing evolution of consciousness, for instance, from the magical, through the mythical, through the mental, to the integral (a la Henri Bergson, Tielgard de Chardin, Sri Aurobindo, Allan Combs, Ken Wilber and others) and beyond to causal and non-dual states of consciousness outlined by those having achieved these states; basically following what Aldous Huxley and others have reviewed, which is known as the perennial philosophy. You yourself stated that your research has been developed in isolation; perhaps that is your Achilles heel?

      For instance, the progress of the evolution of consciousness in history had, for a currently unknown reason digressed immediately following the fall of the Roman Empire, and for approximately a thousand years it languished from roughly 500-1500 A.D. before resuming again, though it continued to survive in Persia and the Eastern Roman Empire; a suggestion that a snapshot, such as the one you have taken, might only be explainable in retrospect and by other discovered means, as time and history unfolds. -Combs (2009) Any investigation of the pause in evolution at that time for example, without the advantage of considerable hindsight, would have been malformed. In fact, there is not even a consensus today regarding what was its cause. What, therefore, is the possibility that your position is also malformed?

      Yes, I believe that not every one here at RS is neurologically/psychologically functional, but not as a result of malnutrition as you suggest. This dysfunction is a contraindication of the ongoing process of the evolution of consciousness, not as you suggest, the ongoing process of its devolution. Humanity has yet to achieve the state of consciousness it will require for survival (a state that has already been achieved by many, including myself, so I know that it is not only possible, but is probable). A broad reading of the history of the evolution of consciousness, along with the consensus of its researchers demonstrate that this is indeed the deliberate direction of its flow.

      You and I apparently stand at opposite shores of this vast ocean. While your theory seems to be directed downward, mine seems to be directed upward. Even if they were equally weighted, I would still prefer my own.

      The reason for my initial humorous impression of your article, and the reason I expected (but did not see) more comments like my own in this thread can be understood by reading the book, Blink – The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, by Malcolm Gladwell. Mr Gladwell’s research helps to explain the phenomenon of jumping to a conclusion. He suggests that these leaps-of-faith come from a part of our awareness called the adaptive unconscious and his study of this kind of decision making is wonderfully enlightening reading. “When making a decision of minor importance, I have always found it advantageous to consider all of the pros and cons. In vital matters, however, …the decision should come from the unconscious, from somewhere within ourselves. In the important decisions of personal life, we should be governed, I think, by the deep inner needs of our nature” –Sigmund Freud (Italics added) In the blink of an eye I considered your thesis to be so preposterous so as to be a parody. I cannot tell from where my reaction came exactly, but I can tell you it was visceral indeed! LMAO !!! 

      In retrospect, however, after thinking about your article with a view to the potential impact of your thesis upon others, along with your book which I’m now assuming actually exists, I find it seriously dangerous. The Armageddon we both suggest is coming can apparently only be transcended by one of our two points of view. That a substantial number of respondents in this thread found your thesis to be credible is deeply disturbing to me. What is your message then? I'm sorry if it escaped me during my reading of your article. Should we attempt to save the earth by killing ourselves?

      While my thesis accounts for the potential of the loss of many lives, it suggests that history supports a view of an ever- expanding evolution of human consciousness, eventually leading to a fulfillment of what might have been our original purpose.

      And yours?

 

Mr Leon Night,My response to

Mr Leon Night,

My response to your response was possibly similar to your original response to the article i.e. I laughed out loud.

Firstly the neurological and pyschological degeneration is not down to malnutrition and if that is how you are percieving this proposal then you have missed something incredibly fundamental.

" Should we attempt to save the Earth by killing ourselves" !!!!!! eh

Where did this come from - I mean really is this what Wright is suggesting?? where was that in the article - this is an attempt on your part to bring in emotive language to try and distract from the fact that you do not actually know what Wright is proposing and you feel threatened.

Of course this is not what Wright is proposing so get a grip on reality please...

What is it that you find seriously dangerous Mr Night? I am very curious.

That we need to look into the bio-chemistry that was present for millions of years during our evolution and the neuro-enhancing chemicals that science now knows are present within this matrix?

Or that we might actually be suffering from a condition that is creating social, environmental, and relationship disharmony on an unprecedented scale that leaves millions under the tyranny of violence and serious suffering? check out the amnesty literature if you want a million examples of how this manifests, as well as the unbelievable environmental destruction our increasing consumerist lifestyle is creating.

I think the danger Mr Night is the untested presumption that we are at the peak of evolution - from my perspective that is vastly more scary than what Wright is proposing by a very long way!!

Thank you kc

I'll read the article again more carefully this time. If I misinterpreted its message, I appologize.

Okay Kc, here ya go...

      Under the subtitles New structure, Contraction, and Catastrophic failure: Wild speculation. No proofs of thesis or references are provided. Opposing scenarios are widely supported in the scientific community.

      Under the subtitle: Ancient treatment: Further wild speculation without scientific support; makes a series of wild conclusions suggesting that this authors speculative reasoning leads directly to his prognosis that we’re in “a living hell where only the deluded sense of being in control at any cost provides temporary respite from the self inflicted nightmare”.

      Will you also buy my argument that my mother had sex with an almond tree, and as a result, I have almond-blonde hair?

      Under the subtitle Examples… 1): After a few arguably accurate suggestions, again with no references, the author states, “So while the design for our brain and all aspects of our physical form are encoded in the genetic blueprint the final structure is dictated by the precise cocktail of chemicals in the developmental environment.” (italics added) How the final structure of the brain is “dictated” does not depend upon any single environmental element no matter how convinced he might be that it does. He further goes on to conclude, after more unsupported claims in this section that, “the consequence cannot be anything other than the congenital malformation of our brain.” This is an unsupported conclusion based only on wild speculation.

      In section 2) he talks about “some [other] theories” but again fails to provide references. Then, in a seeming contradiction of his own statement (mentioned above) he writes,  “…biological structures, their precise design and molecular arrangement is dictated by DNA.” Going on to add that, “they display a very high level of plasticity in response to their biochemical environment,” (italics added) Well, which is the dictator? DNA or a cocktail of chemicals? 

      Concluding this section he asserts, again without references, “Is it any wonder that the near total loss of the complex and hormonally active chemicals present and essential during the evolution and development of our brain has left the most delicate and hormonally sensitive parts of our consciousness system twisted and distorted literally out of all recognition.”

      Could there be any other possible explanation for my having been born with blonde hair? C’mon, this stuff isn’t even passing my thesis sniff test!

      Section 3) contains two of my favorites: “at least a 95% deficiency, in fact its more like 98% and it's the reason why it takes a while for the implications to sink in…. [because] your ability to assimilate this information is seriously compromised by severe neurodegenerativedementia, what ever your age.” So that's why I can’t understand it!!! Does this sound familiar to anyone? Does the word religion help? Yup, this thesis shines through just like the blinding light of mythical truth!

      If “Everyday life and death decisions are made on behalf of millions of people based on the untested presumption that the most complex piece of engineering we know is even remotely functional”, then how come we even have “examples of ‘advanced' engineering, Concorde, The Northrop GrummanB-2 Stealth bomber, The Space Shuttle, The large Hadron Collider or The Hubble Telescope” to refer to as such ‘examples’? If our brain were so malformed, could these machines even be possible? Is this author soon to say that these 'advances' must have been designed and built by aliens because humans are too stupid? 

      Just because Cambridge based researcher Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, (the only reference he includes) suggests that “FT [foetal testosterone] is negatively correlated with social and language development, and is positively correlated with attention to detail and a number of autistic traits.” doesn't mean all of us are in some way Autistic according to his thesis, or does it? Wikipedia goes on to state “The role of foetal testosterone in autism remains to be assessed in clinical cases” (italics added) in regards to Autism, meaning that his research is not conclusive. Yet the author's conclusions are beyond contention?

      Where are all of the “well evidenced and accepted… pieces of the evolutionary jigsaw” to which he refers?

      In the Conclusion section: he relies on “ancient mythology” for his  “…accurate account of the catastrophic failure of our consciousness system.” Really? “Evidence from several modern scientific disciplines supports the ancient accounts…” What evidence? Where is his evidence?

      “All that is required to restore our sanity is to repair the precise molecular structure and restore the neuro-chemical regime that is absolutely essential to perceive reality” Again, where is his evidence? Really? Is that all that is necessary?

      “Even a partial fix is likely to yield a profound improvement in our mental health and bring with it the cognitive capacity to effect a complete restoration.” Now, we only need a partial fix from his proprietary bag of tricks for a complete restoration? Oh, come on!

      “Prioritising anything other than the immediate structural repair of our mind simply highlights how far we have fallen into the abyss of our own insanity.” You had been talking about the brain and its chemical imbalances. Are you now saying that the mind is simply an epiphenomenon of the brain? Isn’t that considered old science by many?

       “Of course it would simply not be tenable to propose such a catastrophic failure if there were not an overwhelming body of evidence to support it.” Yes, of course! I agree! MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY! ! !

      I rest my case, and reiterate all of my comments above!

      Jeeze, I hate getting into the weeds like this. I think I'm coming down with a rash!

 

Also to Kc...

      If I am to follow his admittedly “Dark” thesis, what is to become of humanity should we decide not to drink his cool aid? It seems as if the alternative is an abysmal future which spirals down even beyond the realms of this hell which he states as our current situation. In such a scenario, does it not seem better, at some inconceivably darker point than this, that humanity should become extinct? If not to save our own excruciating pain, but at least for the sake of the planet? That was the reason for my suicide comment. It was an attempt at sarcasm. Do you not see such an admittedly dark thesis as his somehow psychologically dangerous to the unwary? I sure do.

      Meanwhile, the consensus opinion among consciousness researchers under appropriate peer review is that, from the Old Stone Age and earlier periods to the present, consciousness is definitely growing upward and outward (evolving). You don’t even have to read about it in some book. You only have to follow the development of a human new-born into adulthood to see this evolution of consciousness in action; you can personally witness the evolutionary stages of the growth of consciousness yourself! (If reading is your thing, please see the author’s references I left in an above response) If you conclude, as this author may have, that our current state of madness is something more than just a blip in deep evolutionary time, then you need to visit the Grand Canyon with a pocket full of Shrooms. 

     “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge” -Stephen Hawking

 

Thanks

Thank you Leon for taking the time to respond to my comment -

I don't need to go to the Grand Canyon with a pocket full of shrooms to get my conclusions - a simple forest or a bubbling stream close to home with a pocket full would suffice ;)

I am quiet capable of going within and experiencing my own connection to the profound reality that exists beyond words and concepts. I would greatly prefer this than being told by a collective group of consciousness researchers what the accepted (and from my personal perspective highly questionable) paradigm is.

Like I said before accepting that humans are at the pinnicle of evolution is vastly more scary than questioning that presumption.

The use of entheogens to go some way towards restoring molecular damage that has occured from a failing pineal gland makes perfect sense to me and gives me great hope. Combining this with nutritional restoration and tms gives me even more. 

Geologic/Evolutionary time

      Hi Kc,

      Thanks for the conversation.

      You are correct that humanity is FAR from having reached its true pinnacle or summit. My investigations so far have uncovered nine known levels of consciousness accepted by various researchers through peer review and comparison. These are basically divided into three categories as follows (A through C):

      A)   Preconventional

1)    Magical

2)    Mystical

B) Conventional 

3) Dualistic mental (Perspectives confined to Either/Or)

4) Pluralistic mental (More than two perspectives)

5) Integral mental (All possible perspectives)

C)   Post Conventional (aperspectival)

6) Illumined mind (Lower Subtle)

7) Intuitive mind (Higher Subtle)

8) Over mind (Lower Causal)

9) Super mind (Higher Causal)

      To suggest we’ve reached a pinnacle is both true and false depending upon the individual’s perspective. To a person living within his or her mythical/stage-one-mental world, this is their pinnacle. One only has to talk to a ‘tea bagger’ to understand the commitment they have to their own ‘superior’ point of view. Yet those of us, whose world view has proceeded beyond theirs to stage-two/stage-three mental, stand aghast at their sophomoric opinions. Those at stage 4/5 can't understand why we all just can't get along, and those at stage 6-9 have come to understand that the argument itself doesn't even matter.

      One has to look at the vast overall landscape of consciousness to appreciate that the pinnacle of human consciousness may in fact be an ever-receding horizon, but there are at least nine known levels. This was the reason for my Grand Canyon comment. My visit there gave me an intense appreciation for deep geologic time, which I have used to better understand deep evolutionary time as it relates to consciousness. Gazing at the cross-section of millions of years of geologic time, looking at each distinctive layer, and thinking about what geologists have uncovered regarding each, was a paradigm-changing experience for me.

      So, based upon these nine levels, for instance, the consensus consciousness of today is generally between level 2/3 and level 3/4, FAR from the known pinnacle or summit of revealed stages of consciousness. (3 on a known scale from 1 to 9)

Further, the consensus among these researchers is that the evolution of consciousness is proceeding from the lower to the higher stages, when viewed from the widest possible perspective, at an ever-increasing pace.

      I hope this helps. Thanks again for continuing the conversation.

  

Hi Leon, thank you again

Hi Leon,

thank you again for taking the time to respond.

WOW - the Grand Canyon 'trip' must have been totally mind blowing - I'm jealous!

I currently still percieve a collective devolution in consciousness, which I have come to conclude from my own experiences into higher states of awareness.  Espcially the non-verbal states of energetic connection. 

This ties in with the universal myths and legends and the parallels in the stories...which basically revolve around four distinctions  - the pinnacle - the fall - the degeneration - and the restoration. These stories - although the details differ-all have these four same themes and exist in every corner of the globe.  I think there is a reason for this and it is because they hold poetic truth.

I think we are currently at the height of degeneration and are embarking and about to embark on the restoration.

The work of the author of this article has grounded my perceptions, espcially because of my interest in biological nutrition, hormones, entheogens and split brain research.  The categories you have given are interesting and can also tie into the model being presented here. What undertanding do you have of the consciousness that is exhibited through each side of the brain?

Have you also come across the work of Serafetinides on LSD?

A little bit more, for clarification.

      The earliest stages of human consciousness included undifferentiated states of unity, The current stage of human consciousness does not necessarily reflect a state of such unity (although many humans regularly achieve this state personally) The future stage of consciousness will be marked by a state of unity, but unlike the ancient state of undifferentiated unity, this will be a state of differentiated unity.

      Future humans will exist in a state of unity, unlike their ancient ancestors who hadn’t an architectural clue how their consciousness was constructed. Future generations of homo sapiens sapiens sapiens will be carrying the completed set of blueprints for that state of unity consciousness comfortably under their arm; the origin and the construction of consciousness will become known to all.

      My understanding of the “fall from grace” described by the Bible and other sources is that this ‘fall’ reflected the progress of evolving consciousness from the uroboric undifferentiated unity of the ancient past to the current mental-ego state of almost total separation from unity. I understand why many cannot consider this to be progress, especially when their mythical ancestors called it a “fall from grace”, but one must try to see things not from the perspective of an obsolete stage of consciousness, but try to see things from a more enlightened state if possible. Try to step back (to the Grand Canyon view ;-) and consider their bias at that ancient time and how it impacted their agenda. Of course for them it was a fall from the almost womb-like state of undifferentiated unity consciousness they had become accustomed to. They suddenly realized they had become separate, ripped from the womb of their previous state! They were indeed expelled from the environment they knew as “paradise” but only from their own perspective.

      More to your point, I believe that our current state of the mental ego (stages 3-5) is indeed the “the height of degeneration” but from the perspective of the uroboric womb, not from a higher perspective of today. As you correctly state, “…[WE] are embarking and about to embark on the restoration.” Except that I believe that this is an embarkation to a new state of unity, not a “restoration of [the] paradise” of the uroboric womb-like state of oldTo return to that state would be to forfeit every progressive and beneficial facet of dozens of thousands of years of human accomplishment.

      The future that you and I foresee is almost identical. There are two differences in our views that I’m currently picking up here. One is that, in my view from a geologic/evolutionary (Grand Canyon) viewpoint, the entire scope of human development has been progressive. (Our journey from the womb of uroboric unity, to the separation of individuation, and finally(?) to a cohesive marriage between the two; a state of differentiated unity). In otherwords, one of the differences lies in the distinction I am making between undifferentiated unity and differentiated unity (between the unity of the ancient past and the unity of the near future). The other difference lies in your view of evolution from the plateau of consciousness on which you currently stand; from where it is easy to feel a sense of drowning; a sense of “degeneration” so to speak.

      There is no doubt much feeling of death here, just as the fetus dies to its former uroboric state in order to become a child (inferior or superior,depending upon its point of view). And then another death will occur when humanity evolves into the next stage of a more advanced life form (superior or inferior, depending upon your point of view).

      P.S. No, I'm more familiar with the work of Stanislov Grof and his LSD experiments as they relate to consciousness. 

In answer to your question:

      Concerning the brains hemispheres, I made the following comment above in one of my responses to Tony:

      "I do not doubt that a snapshot of current human behavior is suggestive of pathological dysfunction. Nor do I doubt that an imbalance in hemispherical cohesion may be pointed to as a possible link. In fact, my theory is that at some point in our near future this hemispherical imbalance will be corrected, perhaps by an event involving our near extinction. Such a stressful event, in my opinion, has the potential to cause a bifurcation in consciousness resulting in a Metanoic mutation that could be considered a spontaneous evolutionary event. Such Metanoia should contain the momentum necessary to catapult our species on a trajectory toward eventual survival and prosperity the likes of which we can now only dream."

 

Under the subtitles New

Under the subtitles New structure, Contraction, and Catastrophic failure: Wild speculation. No proofs of thesis or references are provided.

Errm that’s because it’s a summary intended to provoke a reaction…it doesn’t have references per se, anyway, good to see your ambivalence has cured itself. I do mention Baron-Cohen simply as he is one of the few people researching the correlation between steroids and asymmetric brain development, particularly masculinisation in regard to ASD. He does not take any account of the evolutionary/molecular ecology that the ape/human brain evolved in, but then no neurological research does at all (unless you know otherwise?). So while his provisional data on ASD is of interest the ‘normal’ asymmetric masculinisation in the absence of flavonoids is central. The other pieces of the jigsaw are much more well researched though not within the context of checking for neurological dysfunction during congenital and early development, again, that has never been done as far as I know. For that you have to look a little harder but not very much i.e. Google split brain research and anosognosia, you will find the same kinds of references I added to the page I linked to earlier, or primate diet Katherine Milton etc. However I would prefer you find the references/data or lack thereof yourself, this was always my intention with the summary though perhaps I expected too much. So you can of course take the summary out of context and treat it as if it were the objective data in which case you are correct, it is a subjective summary and it ‘proves’ nothing on its own. Ignorance of the data for example on the transcription modifying, MAOi/aromatase inhibitory and anti oxidant effects of flavonoids and how that may explain the severe delusion and denial that are currently rationalised as ‘normal’ left hemisphere functioning (by the left hemisphere) will not disprove the summary. What we are left with is simply your opinion versus my own and despite your allusion to religion I’m not interested in propagating a belief system, quite the opposite. So by all means take it apart both piece by piece and in context, but at least look at the data, not just my selection on the page already twice referenced but any related data alluding the central thesis. Of course current thinking will support current paradigms on evolving consciousness etc Until proponents of such paradigms have considered and dismissed the transcription modifying effects of flavonoids etc I’m not sure where that gets us. I’m certainly intent on ensuring the harsh conclusions I have reached in context with the data it is based on continues receive that kind of attention and so far it is not as easy to dismiss as you might like to believe.

Thank you, Tony.

      Thank you, Tony, for your polite response to my critique.

      I believe that my reaction to the emotionally charged subjective extrapolations of your article would have been muted considerably if the context you suggest I ignored was introduced in the beginning of your article. If you designed your article so as to elicit a particular reaction, you certainly got that! But was my visceral reaction to your considerable intellect, suggested by the nature and depth of your thesis but masked by your rhetoric, really the reaction you were fishing for?

      What if you dispensed with the rhetoric and simply outlined the basics your thesis, including references as is customary? Wouldn’t the reaction received have been more cerebral and less reactionary?

      While I’m more inclined to consider your thesis now after having visited a few of the links you provided, I must say that your approach at grabbing my attention is largely what contributed to my revulsion. Did you really think that beginning your article with an insult to someone’s intelligence was going to result in a calm and detached response? How many politicians would get your vote if they told you straight away that that your ability to appreciate the greatness of their towering capabilities was hampered because you are hopelessly retarded?

      Might simply presenting your thesis in a more conventional way have been a better use of all of your and my energy? Wouldn’t someone become more inclined to purchase your book, which I now suspect is filled with the references you omitted here, if he/she were encouraged to believe it to be a scientifically inclined treatise, instead of a subjective rant?

      I continue to believe that your thesis is listing seriously to one side, but I now appreciate it as a fringe, but arguably realistic contention, within the larger framework of the necessary discussion concerning our situation. Hypermascunilization is one of many drivers of today’s insanity, and your contention that micronutrient malnutrition is a significant malignant cause is of considerable value in this discussion. I suggest, however, that you lose the rhetoric and just present the facts, and the lines you have drawn between them, and then let us decide.

      Again, good luck with your theory Tony, and thank you for being such a full participant here in the RS community. It is a rare occurrence by an author marketing their work here.

      Take care...   

Hi Leon, Thank you for your

Hi Leon, Thank you for your considered reply, I am not sure how to respond as your disinterest in investigating the data I cite (not my data) Furthermore, I’m not inclined to investigate your data further reduces the exchange to comparing subjective opinion and a central part of my proposal casts significant doubt on the reliability of subjective opinion (including my own).
Further and for the reason cited above I would not encourage anyone to accept my opinion/interpretation  re the data hence my invitation to 'check it out' and  ‘make up your own mind’

So perhaps somewhat briefly and primarily in response to your final question.

There appears to be a good correlation between perception, mental/psychological health and neural structure/neurochemistry. Our normal state of mind/consciousness is by means unknown strongly correlated with the precise molecular structure of our brain?

Equally and perhaps obviously a strong correlation is known to exist between mental/psychological ill health and structural damage/injury or neurochemical imbalance. A diagnosis of brain injury or neurochemical imbalance for a patient exhibiting symptoms of  ‘suspect’ behaviour would not be considered unusual. In fact discounting such a cause without investigating would be considered in medical parlance as negligence?
As we seem to agree that there is at least some evidence for suspect behaviour then I am merely proposing an accepted diagnosis, a well-evidenced correlation between known cause and known effect. However it is also well known that making such a diagnosis subjectively can be almost impossible (Anosognosia)
In this particular ‘case’ the degree of hemispheric dominance being a major variable in how difficult it is to perceive or even conceive that such a condition exists.

So while my own self-diagnosis did emerge ‘from somewhere within myself’ I was very suspicious and cautious enough to spend more than 15 years checking and re checking the extent data (of all kinds).

What I found was ‘preposterous’ and very shocking (to me) such that far from running naked through my local town shouting eureka or similar I instead ran my clumsily assembled storyboard past as many ‘intelligent’ academics, scholars, and spiritually inclined philosophers as I could easily reach. Only then when initial reaction afforded some degree of support did I seriously consider wider dissemination.

Why? Well it seems very simple, an accurate diagnosis relating to neurological injury and neurochemical imbalance while shocking is also exciting (to me) as it opens up the possibility of a relatively quick fix. However as alluded to and extent in the literature, the fix may be easy if the condition is real, selling the diagnosis will likely be the most challenging aspect of the process.

So again and briefly, I am very acutely and uncomfortably aware of what I am saying and how I am saying it, though I do not claim my approach will be without flaw. More to the point no one could make such a monumental claim (serious, species wide, congenital brain injury) and expect it to stand if there were not a mountain of evidence to support it. So your opportunity to dismiss what may be a dangerous idea does not lie in trading opinions, rather in asking whether any evidence exists to support my proposal. Either there is an elephant in the room (more like a herd of woolly mammoths) or there is not. The neurological/psychological data infers that we should trust the data and not our subjective perception or even our assessment of the data if it results in a diagnosis that does not accord with the data.

Finally I’m not sure that there is such a gulf in objectives, I propose a boot strapping repair based on known ‘biological principles’ you allude to ‘metanoic mutation’ as the delivery vehicle: "In fact, my theory is that at some point in our near future this hemispherical imbalance will be corrected, perhaps by an event involving our near extinction. Such a stressful event, in my opinion, has the potential to cause a bifurcation in consciousness resulting in a Metanoic mutation that could be considered a spontaneous evolutionary event. Such Metanoia should contain the momentum necessary to catapult our species on a trajectory toward eventual survival and prosperity the likes of which we can now only dream."

Flavinoids and Aromatase?

Hi, if you follow the links there is a lot of information on the chemical composition of a typical forest dwelling ape. The hormonal neural and aromatase inhibiting activity of flavonoids seems to have been overlooked in an evolutionary context. Though interestingly the pharmaceutical approaches to hormone dependent cancer crudely mimic this kind of activity.

what's the conclusion

I accept your premise that our brains are dysfunctional and highly delicate. Mine must be even more so, because I didn't get what the solution is. Is there one? http://www.beyond-karma.com

what's the conclusion

It is a brief summary, it does conclude that restoring the complex and unique molecular developmental environment would be a 1st step.

Retarded

so . . . the apex of humans existence happened 200K years ago? The archeo record suggests art started at about this time. I guess I'm in favor of brain retardation then.

!!!!

Of course it's retarded...you don't "get" it, therefore it's all retarded. It must be. Try reading again, and look at the links, and open your mind just a little. You might gain a new perspective on things. Maybe representation of interior states ( ART ) started 200,000 years ago because we were starting to " FALL" into dualistic thinking and the process of divorce from our whole selves had begun. Myths describing a lost golden age common to every culture may indeed be far more real than we care to imagine. I don't agree with everything this man and his associates believe, but they are definitely on the right track.

Myths

"Myths describing a lost golden age common to every culture may indeed be far more real than we care to imagine." and these myths run back 200K years?  I've never heard a story like that.

So opening the mind requires shutting out the archeo record? The author may have some plausible arguments (or at least interesting) regarding environmental factors on brain development, but when he starts to throw out unsupportable claims regarding humans(?) before 200K years ago - "In addition and related to its self recognition capacity its experience of itself could be described in terms of rapture, a perpetual sense of profound wonder and intense sensual joy." - you have wonder where in the world this deduction comes from.  As much as I would like to have a "perpetual sense of profound wonder and intense sensual joy"  I am pretty certain in my closed-minded way that I would have been eaten by a carnivorous feline immediately.

 

 

Myths

The existence of such myths don’t rationally prove anything. (of course you can choose your preferred evidential format for proof unless such a choice is restricted by neurological function). That the experiential capacity for experiences along the lines of "perpetual sense of profound wonder and intense sensual joy" seems to exist at all requires some kind of explanation. Re I would have been eaten by a carnivorous feline immediately implies such exalted states relative to our current normal state would be less functional in a practical sense, not something I have proposed. Also carnivorous felines and predators generally are not common in deep tropical forest.

the 'fall'

funnily enough i was reading about the 'fall into dualistic thinking' last night here

New perspectives on Robert Graves

How this 'fall' came about with the move from Goddess orientation to patriarchal solar appropriation. What what would such a 'fall' mean? Would it mean that the people before the 'fall' were these shiny happy golden smiley people who didn't know the polar relative of joy, sadness? No! But that is the very dualistic belief of the very patriarchal understanding in its esoteric aspect! For their belief systems pretend there WAS or can be a state of being that is always one 'side' of a polar dynamic.

The fall

Does that not presume a polar dynamic in the 1st place?

a 'polar dynamic'

is really just two words. What it is POINTING to is a mystery. For example, how could you read this without there being a polar dynamic, the white background and the black text? Could you just have one without the other? Can you just have light without dark, or all-thetime-ecstasis without contrasts with that?

Polar dynamics

The description relies on polarised terminology, that is all, presuming all experience is confined to the arbitrary limits imposed by such conceptual thinking is part of the perceptual paradox.

Re: Polar Dynamics

So the thesis is that at one time in the past the human brain was functional, healthy and normal, but that it has since fallen into a diseased, unhealthy, abnormal state. This seems quite dualistic, no?

This seems quite dualistic,

This seems quite dualistic, no?

Yes I agree, however I would qualify my agreement with the dualistic concept that any such concepts may be artefacts of a perceptually constricted mind. Attempting to resolve what appear to be conceptual enigmas in our current state of mind may have more to do with symptomology than insight.

so are you saying...

that 'polarized terminology' came before our *experience* of lightness and darkness, day and night, wet and dry, warm and cold, attraction and repulsion, play and rest?

 

Have you ever seen animals JUST play? or whatever terminolgy you want to call that activity. Have you ever seen animals JUST rest? yes or no?

Have you pondered these

Have you pondered these apparent enigmas while in significantly non-ordinary states?

well seeing you asked...

;) Many years ago when I was 15, and was introduced to LSD, and it blew my mind. A BIG event was it blew away, even the few years of,  conditioning I had (a few years that age is forever) from school, mass media, etc which had hooked me onto the IMAGE of the big city. In other words as a younger kid I'd been really into the sense of the magic of nature, and then I began fantasizing about big concerte toxic cities--ala NYC. I think that is a big reason for 'education', and LSD un-did that spell. Then after about 17 I began to search books to try and integrate what I was going through, and I went through emotionally hard times, and loads of books and then I found Cloudhidden Whereabouts Unknown, a book by Alan Watts who explores polarity. I nearly read it in the shop, because out of all i had read from a diverse range of head books etc only this was making any sense.

********************

Then your question: have I wondered about polarity having psychedelics? Well the reason Watts words touched me was precisely because I could dig what he meant, and this exploration has deepened my inquiry, and has inpiosred me to look into origins of religious ideas etc etc. I think that the whole dualistic interpretation of reality comes from a patriarchal point of view, and this mainfests in differing ways, some very subtle. So, for example, not many would presume Eastern philosophy, like says Advaita vedanta was dualistic, but when looked at alcoser it is. But it is a subtle cunning duality. It posits a higher abstraction concept they term 'nonduality'. This is what I think your doing but in a different way again. You are implying that *because* my biology has declined FROm an earlier state of a nondualistic nature--or whatever you want to call it--that I cannot fathom what you mean. Ie., I am stuck.

But I just see that as yet another variation of what I describe. There is nothing WRONG WITH polar-related reality, and in fact you cant have this reality without it. That is the mystery of it, yet the non-understanding or refusal to understand it has caused a lot of trouble over the millenia.

I could be argues that IS part of the game of 'it'---say 'good' and 'evil', but I dont call it a game when people suffer because of evil. It is more ignore-ance.

what do you not agree with

cdcaleo

Yes that is how I have understood it -

I want to keep my mind open so I am interested in what it is about Wrights proposal that you don't agree with? 

When I first read Tony

When I first read Tony Wright's brilliant book I missed the most important part -- this high flavonoid diet was also high in MAOIs -- so that DMT was naturally increased in the brain. Glad to see this here.

Glad indeed

Wombs are cozy

Hey Tony

I have one question for you. What's your opinion on the availability of this "diet" and lifestyle that we need in order to give our "SUV" brains enough fuel? Do you think the earth is abundant enough to feed 6.5 billion people? If so, are the people and organizations in power organized enough to be able to harvest this diet for the everyday person? If what you are saying is true, then the people in power would take advantage of this knowledge and feed themselves this brain fertilizing diet for generations, giving them the mental advantage over the general population. Keeping the general population "perceptually blind" seems to be in the interest of the powerful. It would kind of shine some light on why the same families maintain power for generations. I'm not big in to conspiracy theories but it's an interesting thought.

It seems the earth more or

It seems the earth more or less feeds 6.5 billion people increasingly based on exceptionally inefficient, fuel hungry and ecologically destructive systems that produce extremely poor nutritional quality with the objective of financial gain. Switching to systems that produce high quality nutrition while improving ecological quality, prevention of soil loss, flooding etc are already well understood. Unfortunately permaculture and agroforestry etc do not fit in with the mentality of built in obsolescence. Trashing the precious few inches of soil and planting glorified grass seed and the like every year (hardly primate food) rather than managing plant species that can crop for generations, its not exactly rocket science.  The cause and hopelessly inept responses to these kinds of challenges are not practical, they merely represent symptoms of a deranged mind. It would be hard to dream up more idiotic designs for approaches to sustainable culture than those currently implemented.
Hierarchical structure is simply another symptom, neurological injury, fear and control are closely related and very dangerous bed fellows. Restoring the biochemistry essential for optimal neurological development and function would treat the cause rather than perpetuate the symptoms.

Mr. Wright...

Thank you for patiently responding to all the posts. I don't remember the last time the author of an article took the time to address all the responses. I wanted to ask how you feel about the use of entheogens to recalibrate the deranged mind? Obviously, as you've stated, many traditional cultures and mystics/religious renegades clearly saw a problem with "normative" human behavior. They may have used wildly different ways to describe what had went wrong, but they saw and felt it and tried to address the imbalance with ritual and fasting, sleep deprivation and regular use of entheogenic substances. Do you feel diet is the primary response, or simply a part of a larger program ?

The requirement for any

The requirement for any ‘technique’ implies a failure, however the judicious use of techniques or treatments as a 1st step towards repair and prevention would be a sane response? Also looking at the common denominators in all ‘techniques’ or ‘treatments’ can give a good indication of the underlying condition. The effectiveness of entheogens will likely vary, those most able to mimic the activity of the neuro-chemical regime prior to deficiency would likely be most beneficial. This will be complicated by the asymmetry in congenital damage, the left hemisphere appears to have lost any capacity for perceptual restoration via neuro-chemical supplementation, the necessary neural architecture having been eroded. The right hemisphere appears to retain some of the precise neural architecture required though it is clinically deficient in the neurochemistry essential for optimum function. So an appropriate retrofit of neurochemical analogues may not bring with it a smooth experience. Rapidly elevating the function of the right hemisphere will also shift the balance of cerebral dominance (undoubtedly part of the objective), this in turn can be perceived as very frightening to the normally dominant left hemisphere. Its experience of losing control and the ‘experience’ of being slowly engulfed by an experiential world it has no capacity to relate to can result in classic drug induced psychosis. However with careful psychological preparation and management the transition from one interpretation of realty to another can be sufficiently ‘enlightening’ to make what went for normal virtually redundant in an instant. Diet, (highly advanced molecular engineering) the hormonal effects of our ancestral diet on the precise structural development/integrity of our neural architecture as well as build quality and the complex cocktail of neurochemically active compounds would make diet a central part of any restoration regime. So yes the judicious treatment of chronic neurochemical deficiency hand in hand with other approaches would make sense if our only conduit to experiential ‘reality’ is currently imprisoned by the lack of such treatment. The inexorable prohibition of such traditional treatments as the left has assumed ever greater control is perhaps one of the greatest ironies we have ever created. A sane response would be to urgently prioritise carefully managed access to what remains of our advanced functionality as a step towards full restoration and prevention. Legislatively maintaining the current hemispheric regime in the face of the overwhelming tragedy it has caused would be classed as crime against humanity. Unfortunately while the left hemisphere thinks it is human via a bunch of labels it needs to be taught, its experiential capacity for being human has long gone. A harsh diagnosis yet for a species that has the rare capacity for profound empathy (a trait that renders laws prohibiting harm irrelevant) something terrible must have occured to explain the repeating cycles of inhumane slaughter on an industrial scale.

Transcendence

There have been people transcending duality all throughout time.

We leave Eden one at a time, every day based on our own mental state, of which the physical brain only acts as a relative medium of time/space function.

There is virtually no human dilemma that cannot be understood with our present brain state.

We will tell ourselves anything to make up for actually using the brain we have.

what i dont like is...

people are always telling us theres something wrong with us. Check it out--has been going of for a long time in the patriarchal mindsets--heres few samples--Judeao, the 'fall' guilt, disobedience to a 'higher' power, and then all the laws follow, and we 'must die' ********************* Christianity--'original sin' cause of sexual 'lust. We are 'sinners' who need to believe in a historical saviour ******************* Islam--you gotta pray pray pray, and they have the very brutal Shariah Law *************** Buddhism--all is suffering. We 'cling to ego' so we must meditate meditate meditate **************** Hinduism--and its 'karma' and caste system ********** Our secular paradim of the Meritocracy--your shit unless you 'some BODY' etc*kincetra

The Missing Link…

….to my world view. Thank you Tony and to your partner for creating this work. I have been searching for the reason, cause, trauma that created the consciousness in humans that would reflect the disconnect in our species. AND this is it. So simple, so obvious and so profound. The ramifications of this work is beyond immense. It is the key to the ultimate question of why there is evil. And the answer is that there is NO evil, just an imbalance. No blame…No judgment, just that it happened. Suddenly all the myths of the fall make sense.

Suddenly the Kali Yuga makes sense. As well as the search for the Holy Grail, the return to Eden, the Second Coming, The Apocalypse, The Messiah, 2012 and the Age of Aquarius. They are all metaphoric messages that our Right Brain is trying to communicate.

Suddenly the persecution of the Goddess, sexuality, ecstatic experiences, the casting away of our Shadow Self, Eugenics and the blind destruction of the environment, make sense. The mystics were right. The answer to peace is in the unification and integration of our brain, and living with the Tao. Not metaphorically, but as reality. For me this is the single most important article (and links) I have ever read here.

Blessings and much good luck in getting this out to the world….I hope our paths cross one day.

I have never felt compelled

I have never felt compelled to comment here before, but this article is so important that I felt I just had too!

Firstly thank you Tony for putting together something so coherent, so radical, so utterly mind blowing that I have been virtually floored since reading it!It makes perfect sense of every experience, and every observation I have had since exploring my own consciousness. I just had no framework/container to put them within.

zezt - why do you think people are always telling us "there is something wrong with us?". Have you ever said to yourself that something - generally behaviour based - is insane? Have you ever wispered these words under your breath? I am totally sure most people have here on this website? The way we are behaving on planet Earth is insane. Finally somebody has had the creative insight to present a sane case for why that might be.

Tony I am sure that this work will reach global attention - it has too!

'why are 'we' insane'? is the question?:

Hi Kookie cookie ;) You ask me this interesting question, which I will try and explore to the best of my ability:

"zezt - why do you think people are always telling us "there is something wrong with us?". Have you ever said to yourself that something - generally behaviour based - is insane? Have you ever wispered these words under your breath? I am totally sure most people have here on this website? The way we are behaving on planet Earth is insane. Finally somebody has had the creative insight to present a sane case for why that might be."

WHO designed this insanity? Are you suggesting the indigenous peoples who the invaders betrayed, abused, tortured, and committed genocide on, were/are 'insane'?? They may not have been perfect. I don't believe in perfection. But many were far more understanding how to live intelligently and lovingly with nature and animals than the mindset that came uninvited into their lands, So I choose to look at THAT mindset as 'insane', and try and explore how they promote, and maintain their insanity through the generations, thus imposing it on us and all species. So we have to look at their mythology, religion, philosophy, and science. Does this mean you need to surround yourself with a million books and study constantly? No, just dig patterns that connect, and then it all begins falling into place. *************

So for example, their mythology is based--in western culture which is the culture dominating the planet--in Greek patriarchal myth. The Olympian gods on their pyramidal mountaintop with Zeus as the top god. This theology imposed the view that 'mortals'/us are forever separated from the 'gods'/them/elite and any move on our part to become god is the worst sin, *hubris*. What does this mean on the deepest level? It is meaning the oppression of the very anceint Goddess, pagan, spirituality whereby the Celebrant actually EATS the 'god' of nature (lover of the Goddess, Earth etc, or sacred plant, and becomes possessed. Intefused with a deep sense of interelationship with the Web of Life. NOT insanity but the Divine Madness. So see that patriarchal mythology of the Greeks prohibits this LIBERty. OK?****************** So now let's look at their religious creation story from the Book of Genesis: Again we have the same theme of 'mortals' (supposedly immortal before their sin (notice the patriarchal premise that mortality and immortality are separable)) being forbidden to not only eat the sacred fruit/entheogen "and become gods like us" they are even forbidden to go near the Tree and are thrown out of Paradise to become slaves to 'God'/the elite. As John Lamb Lash reveals here, http://www.metahistory.org/psychonautics/Wasson/OldestTabooIntro.php , eventually people who read the 'WORD' of 'God' will forget what the taboo is even *about*. The secret is only for the 'initiated*--us, the salves, and now the consumer-slaves willy nilly blindly supporting the destruction of the Web of Life, must not even KNOW what the taboo actually is---ie., entheogenic fruit/sacred medicine that can heal all the 'insanity. So that is their religion. Next their philosophy: ********************* One of the biggest ancient Greek philosophical influences for western thinking has been Plato. But if you really want to know the influence of his thinking checkout John Taylor Gatto http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/1j.htm He says how Plato's ideas in his The Republic are commensurate with the Indian caste system, whereby the people were set into categories, and if you are--according to the 'philosopher kings' (of which Plato believed he was one) then you are doomed to be that. That is your lot. Gatto exposed the so-called 'education' system which has been deliberately planned and used by the 'insane' mindset to keep us dumbed down blind consumer slaves who don't question our 'masters' ******Now science, or rather scientism, which is the new religion. This is used by the above to supposedly legitimize their claims about reality, and a big one is that you and me, etc, are suppsed to be 'machines'. Acquired to be efficient machines, and if we 'break down' and/or do not 'co-operate' we need their 'drugs' to get us back to being productive consumers. This is their mental illness myth, but also medical science per se sees us as machines. No soul. No understanding of our primal interrelationship with the natural world which is us, and the sacred plants as part of this original religion. They separate out the body from sorting out problems and healing: "“Traditional societies, such as the American Indian, do not separate the three areas; thus, their ceremonies including peyote rituals or sweat lodge are at the same time: worship, curing, and problem solving. In modern Western societies these three areas are kept academically and professionally distinct. The rigid separation of these three functions along the lines of professional guilds and their special interest groups may be one of the reasons why Western societies except for the American Indian have found it so problematical to deal with psychedelics in a rational, socially beneficial manner." (The Nature of the MDMA Experience and Its Role in Healing, Psychotherapy, and Spiritual Practice Sophia Adamson and Ralph Metzner ) So having brrifley overviewed all their branches of oppression (though of course there always exist positives. However if you look at it all as an enforced paradigm and see what's being down to planet earth UNDER this paradim, it doesn't look too good right?) I will say how saying something is wrong with us suits their purposes and keeps it maintained. With patriarchal mythology, as said we were 'mortals' and are not allowed to become 'immortal'--or rather gain insight into the GAME being played by the controlling elite--that there exists a nonbridgeable gulf between 'mortality' and 'immortality'. In other words we are suppressed from remembering the deeper mythology about all of this, AND the direct experience via entheogenic experience! So what was 'wrong with us' was we were mortal and needed their guidance, because the elite were closer to the gods. **************** With patriarchal religion (which really is of course mythology though it pretends to be historical) we are told we are GUILTY as soon as we are born because of Adam and Eve's 'disobedience to God' which MADE us 'mortal' and brought death to us, and the very fall of nature. The Christians embellish the Hebrew myth to mean 'original sin' and they say this is our very sexuality which is the major sin--our 'lust'. So all of us are born into original sin and need their authority through 'Jesus'. This is to keep us stuck to their authority/business. ****************** then Philosophy and science: the former as influenced by Plato etc, we are most of us born slaves who NEED the guidance of the more 'advanced' "Philosopher-Kings". This 'guidance' must be overt and covert. And with the latter, they come to use scientism in their Eugenics myth, and myth of mental illness, and 'education' to make out that we are faulty IF we do not abide by their souless destructive civilization's mode of operation which actually is enslaving us, abusing and killing all other species, and destroying the Web of Life. So can you see how they operate? They first have to claim you are wrong in some way, and this belief on your part clings you to their authority and business. You follow them as a 'needy guilt-ridden wretch' in need of their support, because they have convinced you of such!

thanks

Thanks for spelling update - English has never been my strong point ;)

Firstly I understand where you are coming from and the thoughts you pose.

As far as I can understand the myths and legends of a fall from grace are pretty much universal and exist in all cultures across the globe - outside of just the patriarchal religions.  I personally do not buy that these myths were created by the elite to have us believe that something is wrong with us to keep us dumbed down and under control.

Of course it is obvious that this is what it has become used for, and also what it has been for hundreds if not thousands of years,  but my own personal feeling is that the roots to the religious impulse were pure and an attempt to heal the molecular damage that has occured (as is being proposed in this article).

Entheogenic suppression (and entheogenic restoration would go some way towards healing this molecular damage - but not the whole way - it is much more than this) and the 'elite' are merely a reflection of this damage.  This damage is serious and creating great suffering for many that are born into the slavery that the patriachal heirachy is continuing to generate, as you pointed out. It will not be any other way until this molecular damage stops occuring during gestation.

On understanding the proposal more - the human rights abuse, and environmental destruction will not stop occuring until this gestational hormonal damage is fixed.

I am far from blind to the conditioning that the congenitally damaged and dominant left hemispheres sense of self is generating. It is horrendous and tragic on such a grand scale that for many it is impossible to go there and they would find it far too traumatic to look behind the curtain that protects us from the truth, so that we can keep buying into the need to prop up the consumerist wheel and feed those at the top with what they desire - power, control, and money!! but ultimately my perception is that this is still a symptom rather than the cause.

Thank you for explaining your position, it gave me more understanding of where you are coming from.

Well

I'd say that diet definitely plays a role in the consciousness of a biological being. Though I also would have to say that the fluctuation of conscious awareness is indeed a natural wave frequency for proper development. What goes up must come down.... what goes down must eventually go up. I agree that the junk food is not helping, or our current lackadaisical concern for the environmental conditions we live in. No nukes will be fired, even the most egocentric political leaders have a major flaw, they are petrified to lose their earthly power and will do anything to stay alive. they are cowards, talk big, act small. We are now on the upswing of the forever fluctuating wave of conscious evolution, after a long period of insanity we are reaching an age of rebirth. Believing diet has nothing to do on the other hands is absurd, you are what you eat. So people seeing this as some scam are silly, and I laugh at you. "in order for there to be order... there must first be disorder"

raw food cult

Bout two years ago I began reading about raw food. I thought I would get into it a bit but never went full sway. I did however introduce more raw food into my diet like salads, and fruit, and green smoothies. But I found myself WORRYING about the foods they warn about, and about 'glutten' containing wheat etc etc.************

And then I found this article: Health Food Junkie which I share here Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";}

http://www.beyondveg.com/bratman-s/hfj/hf-junkie-1a.shtml

because I found it liberating, it stopped me getting too sucked into the cult of health food***********

 

 

Dont get me wrong, I always try and eat organic food, filtered water, and like i say add lots of raw food to my diet, but I found many of the people whose business it is to promote 'healthy eating' seem a bit fanatical.***********

here's an example, the supposed top nutritionist in the UK, Patrick Holford would write pages and pages about food, and how important it is to eat organic---cool, but then push his VERY expensive supplements claiming that we need them to have "100 percent Optimum Nutrition". So what happens is only the rickh can afford that. It becomes this cult of the rich who see themselves as being priovy to eating 'purely' etc**********

Of course these same cultists will then tend to demonize those of us who have to eat a 'poor diet' because of financial reasons, etc. it does NOT mean however that those eating the 'pure' foods are in any way more loving and intelligent, or that ONLY those eating poor diets are callous, mean, serial killers. 

From Cult to Culture

Here on RS there is a similar concern about the alternative retreats being priced too high for the common "Joe" ... who consequently gets "left behind" from all the cool stuff.

From the Raw Food perspective {have been vegetarian for 35 years, raw vegan, off and on for 6}  ... well I agree with you to some degree. 

"Garden of Eden" eating .. out of the back yard ... out of the forest ... out of the greenhouse ... ideally would not require any additional supplementation if the soil is good, and the seed is heirloom, or organic ... and one combines the right combination of nutrients.

Usually the "rich folk" live the furthest away from Eden and therefore should pay the highest dollar to make up for their non-indigenous occupations. 

  And yes, there does seem, to be high promotional profiles on foods and supplements that are "pristine" .. but the soil is depleted and fruits and veggies do not have the nutritional content they used to, or have the potential to achieve ... hence supplementation.  

Whole markets have evolved, but many. many raw fooders are very cool, and low profile, and support basic land use and sharing on a local level as pretty much "all there is to it" 

Raw food "guru" Dr Gabriel Cousens MD only recommends these high dollar / high value supplements only in the beginning to make up for sever nutritional depletion ... then gradually eating raw fruits veggies grains will sustain all by themselves. 

Of course if more and more people were involved all such pricing would go down and the raw lifestyle would of course become relatively normal.

 

 

any one can Required

When our ancient ancestors were ejected from the forest's womb-like protection that had hot housed our evolution.The fundamental causality of our self inflicted suffering.The Origins of our Species-Wide Insanity In this age of Attention Deficit Disorder it seems the only way to get someone's attention.

What about them apes then?

Having read the RS article and most of the material posted by Tony on his website, I have a few questions that relate more to the 'origins' aspect of this theory...

If apes and other simians enjoy (and possibly have enjoyed) an uninterrupted access to a frugivorous (fruits et al.) diet for the better part of modern evolutionary history (even going back beyond Tony's c.200,000 year cut-off bottleneck evolutionary event), then why is it that they have not displayed any particular advances in brain development? Especially if their diet is fostered from a pre-natal stage, then it should be only logical (oops.. my left brain talking here) that we should've witnessed some level of advanced sentience associated with increased cranial capacity and brain size/complexity.

Or is it that their 'nascent' blueprint, i.e. DNA code, exclusively limits that possibility and our ancestral lineage has preserved a variant of inherently superior DNA that encodes for progressively greater neurological function and complexity? That is - two species eat fruit (and therefore, high flavonoid) diets committedly for a millennia and only one goes on to develop the sort of cranial size/complexity and hemispheric balance that mirrors our "homo" lineage. How is that possible? Only if the other less-fortunate species somehow is unable to integrate or is immune to the necessary changes/mutations in DNA that bias for the sort of neurological differentiation during embryogenesis and fetal development that leads to increased brain complexity/size.

Shouldn't there first be a mechanism that arrives on the scene that allows for the processing of the chemicals so abundantly found in fruit and translate that to the sort of favoribility to the stuff that resides in skulls? And wouldn't such a mechanism be the first 'ingredient' in our bigger picture that gets favorably selected for and passed down successive generations and therefore lead to the sort of biochemistry that allowed for enhanced brain function/capacity/balance etc.? So is the basic difference between us and our simian cousins the prejudice on part of nature/destiny/the fates/what-have-you that we developed such a mechanism and they didn't - and in theory leading to the bifurcation along the evolutionary tree that gave rise to our respective genuses (genii?).

I could go on... but I think I've asked too many questions already - and being a first-time poster - I'd hope that Tony personally fielded a response and of course, other esteemed members of the RS community.