On The Use of Propaganda by The Chinese Communist Party
Thomas Laird
As the recent protests were suppressed in Tibet, producers in Beijing directed by the Chinese Communist Party played a video clip on state TV, over and over again. In Lhasa, Tibetan men smash open Chinese shops.
Cut to Chinese shopkeepers, bleeding and bruised in a hospital. It's a simple story for most Chinese. Criminal Tibetans beating Chinese. The Dalai Lama planned these riots. Yet foreigners keep talking about how peaceful he is! What world are they from? A world with freedom of information.
Chinese state TV does not show the lethal force that was used against peaceful Tibetan protests, which sparked the riots. It does not explain that fifty years of repression and a flood of Chinese colonists have made surviving Tibetans fear that if they do not protest they will be erased as a people. Tibetans know that in 1949, there were 500 Chinese families in Tibet, and today there are millions. In the face of that, Tibetans are protesting though they know it leads to detention without trial, torture, and murder. The average Chinese is kept ignorant of these facts. They cannot see the gory pictures of Tibetans murdered by Chinese in Tibet now on the internet: Yahoo, Google, and their shareholders, helped the Party insure that.
Because of propaganda orchestrated by President Hu Jintao and the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party, average Chinese won't question the big lie the Party promotes as its explanation of the recent protests: the Dalai Lama planned violent riots in Lhasa. Propaganda, murder, lies, racism; those are the tools that the Party uses to remain in power.
And how is that working for the Communist Party? Average Chinese are angry at the money the government has spent in Tibet, trying to develop the area. Howard French, writing for the New York Times, explains that the average Chinese shopkeepers in Tibet see things just as the Party wants them to. Shopkeepers describe the Tibetans as lazy and ungrateful. One says the government has "..wasted our money in helping those white-eyed wolves." A Chinese taxi driver in Lhasa says that Tibetans are "lazy and they hate us"[1]. Other Chinese talk about smelly Tibetans needing a bath, and the long knives they carry. Most Americans and Europeans, because of our own sad history, recognize these as racist stereotypes.
In China, the Party fuels racist hatred as a policy, with propaganda, even as it prevents foreign journalists from documenting its crackdown in Tibet. That's the Party's propaganda policy. Here's how the Dalai Lama describes it: "The Chinese public's lack of information [allows] the government to manipulate their ignorance"[2].
Murder, torture and propaganda have always been the lifeblood of the Chinese Communist Party, policy tools to insure its continued existence and the wealth and power of a tiny elite. Chinese scholars estimate that at least thirty million Chinese died under Mao's senseless guidance. That includes a half million to 1.2 million Tibetans, who died from the Party's invasion, subjugation and rule over Tibet. Mao is the greatest mass murderer in human history. Yet the Party that Mao led to power keeps his face on the Yuan. Zhang Qingli, head of the Party in Tibet, has no shame when promoting the Party's tools and views. He speaks about the Party's view of patriotism, amongst Tibetans, with chilling certitude. "Those who do not love their country are not qualified to be human beings. This is a matter of common sense" [3]. The Party is so certain about its definitions and Mao's tools-- which work so well for them in China--that they are exporting them.
Today China buys 5% to 10% [4] of its oil imports from Sudan: an estimated 60 to 90% of all oil exported from Sudan. The Party sells weapons to the regime in Sudan, controlled by an Arab minority, which in turn commits genocide against the African majority [5]. The Party's UN veto has hobbled any international response. If genocide worked in Tibet and China for fifty years, and the international community did nothing to prevent its use there, why not export genocide? Because there is a genocidal regime in Sudan, western oil companies are forbidden to export Sudanese oil. Why would the Party end genocide in Sudan?
Today Tibetans are being rounded up, tortured, and jailed without trial. The Party's propaganda control prevents anyone from knowing exactly how many have already been shot. Tibetans knew this would be the response before they began protesting. Some Tibetans care more about freedom from the Party's control, for their nation, than about their own lives. They staked their lives, in part, on the hope that in this Olympic year the international community would reign in the Party's typical response.
The question the Tibet crisis raises is about the Party, not China. Since the Party uses murder and propaganda against Tibetans and Chinese, and sponsors genocide in the world as a policy, why are free people around the world empowering the continued rule of these oligarchs who call themselves the Chinese Communist Party?
The American and European policy towards the Party has failed. Democratic and Republican party leaders in the US have followed one policy. It's the same policy followed by ruling parties across Europe and Asia: encourage trade with China so corporations can make profits, this quarter; have quiet, pragmatic talks; eventually democratic values will be exported to China and that will slowly change the nature of the Party. That policy has not worked. Instead, we find the values of the Chinese Communist Party, like genocide, being exported to the rest of the world, even as the Party continues to use propaganda and lethal force to defend its dictatorship in Tibet and China.
Every shoe you wear, every toy you buy, empowers the Chinese Communist Party. Unlike Tibetans, and Chinese, you are free to tell your government what you think about your government's policies that enable that. You do not have to listen to failed propaganda.
Photo by SqueakyMarmot, courtesy Creative Commons license.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/20/world/asia/20tibet.html
[2]http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/21/tibet.china1
[3] http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,431922,00.html
[4] Estimates vary.
[5] The use of "Arab" and "African" in this brief summary does not do full justice to the ethnic reality of Sudan, or the war going on there. However many others have written about the racial genocide going on in Sudan, and a large part of the fuel for that genocide is the animosity felt by the ruling Arab minority towards the African minority, as well as a desire by the Arab minority to control the wealth of Sudan for its sole benefit. Chinese oil is found largely underneath land where African Sudanese live, so they have to be expelled. Like Chinese with Tibetans, Arabs in Sudan feel the African Sudanese are not as civilized as the Arab Sudanese and that they are trying to civilize them. More nuance is available here : http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/sudan0504/4.htm and here http://viewsonworldaffairs.blogspot.com/2006/03/history-of-ethnic-cleansing-in-sudan.html
Thomas Laird has been a journalist based in Nepal for 30 years and has traveled widely in Tibet since it was opened in 1985. He was amongst the first 100 foreigners to enter Tibet when it was opened to outsiders. He has published three books on Tibet. For his most recent, The Story of Tibet (Grove/Atlantic, 2006), a popular history of Tibet, he interviewed the Dalai Lama for more than 50 hours over the course of four years. That book is now being translated into 14 languages.
- Thomas Laird's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version




Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
My monicker for such ruling people
blame the Chinese but what about the West?
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for contributing this piece. Like a lot of very outraged and impassioned articles about China's behavior in Tibet, it ultimately leaves me scratching my head a bit.
When you write, "Since the Party uses murder and propaganda against Tibetans and Chinese, and sponsors genocide in the world as a policy, why are free people around the world empowering the continued rule of these oligarchs who call themselves the Chinese Communist Party?"
I can't help but reflect on the direct actions of our own government, and wonder what the big difference is. Couldn't you write just as accurately:
"Since the US Government and its allies use murder, torture, and propaganda against Muslims and other declared enemies, and sponsors a war that has left a million innocent Iraqi civilians dead, not to mention the effect of its policies in many other parts of the world, why are free people around the world empowering the continued rule of those oligarchs who call themselves the "leaders of the Free World" while trying their hardest to fix elections and debase public discourse?"
Obviously, I believe in the Tibetan cause, but I don't see how we in the US can consider ourselves "free people" capable of addressing the policies of other imperialist regimes while our own government is torturing prisoners who have not even been given a trial, in direct opposition to the Geneva Convention, and continuing an unprovoked and cataclysmic war. At the same time, we have been the worst contributor to climate change and the biggest impediment to international protocols such as the Kyoto Accord that sought to address climate change. Our irresponsible actions in response to climate change over the last decades may turn out to be, by far, the largest "genocidal" decisions ever made, as hundreds of millions of people may perish as sea levels rise and warming and droughts lead to a massive change in agricultural tables, causing mass starvation, as well as the disappearance of the glaciers, leaving gigantic masses of people without drinking water.
So it seems that we have no right to consider ourselves "free people" or to believe that we have any moral or ethical superiority over the Chinese, and to try to intercede in their internal affairs before we have transformed our own system into one that is nondestructive and humane makes no sense to me.
Of course, it is always much easier to feel morally superior about someone else's horrible behavior, and much more difficult to address your own.
I am wondering how you feel about this criticism of your position, which appears to be shared by millions of people in the US?
If I was writing about these matters, I would say that it is shameful and unfortunate that we do not, at this point in time, have the moral basis to stand up to China effectively in their horrible treatment of Tibetans. If we could orchestrate a movement within the US and succeed in restoring dignity to our nation, ending torture and unprovoked war and becoming leaders in the global movement for effective policies on climate change while restricting corporate greed, then we would also have a great and unimpeachable basis to extend ourselves to the Tibetan people. Our first responsibility, logically, then, is to take care of the work that must be done here. Just because freedom of speech is given lip service here, we should not fool ourselves into considering ourselves "free people" at this point in time. Instead, we might consider undertaking the work we have to do to become free.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Laird responds to Pinchbeck
Daniel I’d like to engage what you have said, truly. That’s my goal. So let me start by getting the bile out of my mouth. Please excuse. Let me tell you why its there.
Daniel I hear what you are saying, every day of the week. Its not new. You are right, millions do think what you say. No one has said it (to me) as well as you, or in such a nuanced way. If they had I might not have the bile in my mouth.
Since the Tibet crisis broke on March 14, I have been living this 24x7. Many of us who spent 30 years of our lives involved in Himalayan stories are now minor go-to-guys for new and old media. I am doing radio interviews and writing op-eds and editing other people’s op-eds and so on.
Whether on the radio, (http://www.wpr.org/hereonearth/archive_080402k.cfm), or while responding to comments at other blogs, http://www.jewcy.com/post/chinese_communist_party_propaganda
or while involved in the comment war on one front of the Youtube Sino-Tibet war http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZMyHq7cQeE
I keep hearing variations of the point you raise.
Your question is more nuanced and refined. You at least are not denying the genocide of the Party—see work of Michael Parenti. Do a Youtube search. He is an old leftist, who once thought Stalin was wonderful, then thought Mao was wonderful, and most recently said Slobodan Milosevic was not really responsible for genocide in Serbia. Anyone who tries to talk about Tibet, he kicks around, saying that China liberated the Tibetan slaves. He gets away with this though he has not been to Tibet, even though he constantly throws up historical lies. Because so few people know enough Tibetan history to understand what trash he is spouting. Many people who approach me with your argument set it up by saying that Tibet was not invaded, that there was no genocide and that the Chinese Communist Party is wonderful.
Some Chinese do not even bother with any of that, their blatant nationalism is more purely expressed. Like this “strong rule, we r strong, so... u can bound to shut da fuk up, b/c we Chinese have da right to put a dick in ur ass any time we want to.” No matter what you think of US sins, you might want to take a look at a few things, like this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tok1QYHfXHU&feature=PlayList&p=BF1003A467897800&index=0
So, I am not sure you are up to speed with the level of Chinese nationalism that the Party is actively encouraging, to prop up its rule. Through propaganda. That’s one thing. But then the other, is that I appreciate you do not stoop to the “US is Terrible, so lets excuse China” stuff either…
Since you do not do that Daniel it makes this easier. I don’t have to wade through that mud—and that’s where my bile comes when you raise this topic. Please excuse the forgoing prelude.
You make it easier to answer your question when you say up front “Obviously, I believe in the Tibetan cause…” Too many of the people I speak with dismiss the Tibetans.. what they have suffered is dismissed—because they hate what the US has done in Iraq so much. Some are so blinkered that they deny that China even invaded Tibet.
You are keeping it simple, one pointed. The point you raise as I understand it is this. Since the US government is so terrible, in so many ways, why don’t we fix our own problems first. I have a couple of answers for you.
First, I agree with you. It’s a good idea. Lets do that (also, not first, but also—I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time). We do need to clean up our own mess. We do have a lot of problems that we need to fix, in America, as well as ones that we have allowed to be created, in our own name- -because of our incompetent government—around the world. We would have more legitimacy to face China now, if it were not for Guantanamo and Iraq. If we were not tied down in this war in Iraq we would have more ability to deal with The Chinese Communist Party now, on all sorts of levels. All that is true. Our government has weakened our legitimacy, you are right.
Americans have been struggling with this for centuries. Its nothing new. Imagine the plight of African American soldiers going off to fight Hitler, and coming home to racism. They fought Hitler even though they knew what they would face at home on their return. This hints at part of the answer…. As a nation, even as we struggle to re-gain control over foreign policy, and clean up the messes our incompetent government is making…. Even so, we have to address the most pressing global problems as well. You raise the Global Warming issue as one of them. I add the Chinese Communist Party to the list.
One of the greatest aspects of the United States is that we do have a self-correcting mechanism. Our history proves it. Even though our government (and collectively our consumption…) does impose many terrible things on the planet, still, because we are not ultimately controlled by a dictatorship with absolute propaganda control, we as a people are able to slowly create a more perfect union. We can listen to our better angels. People who try that in China, or under Stalin, or under Hitler, were shot. But Americans stand up and fight the good fight, over and over, in every generation. Even though some of us are shot for doing so. Still there is enough essential strength within our democracy that its self correcting nature rises. There is always some wiggle room here. Whether its Upton Sinclair fighting the robber barons for clean food, or African Americans home from WWII fighting for Civil Rights…. Whether it was intellectuals fighting to convince average Americans that the Spain mattered, in the 1930’s, and was worth risking our lives and security for…
We are an amalgam. Let me say it again. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. We must. We have done it over and over. Its never that we are perfect and others are terrible, or that we have some moral mandate because we are such good democrats. Even though we are incompetent democrats, still we have duties abroad, and at home.
Not every nation has been able to do manage this. Chinese who lived under the terror of Chiang Kai Sheik, during the Chinese Civil War, and the Japanese Invasion…. By 1950 they were so tired of his self-serving lies and corruption, his dictatorship, (despite the façade of democracy he varnished on things) that they said “Even the Communists cannot be worse that this bastard.” So they let the Communists take over. The people lost the will to fight them anymore. And the democrats were so corrupt, so weak, the army they created was hollowed out by corruption from within….so the Communists took over China. And ever since the Party has jailed or executed anyone who challenged their dictatorship.
As it turned out Mao was a greater murderer and worse a dictator than Chiang had been. And oddly, since Chiang had always hidden behind the pose of democracy, (in part because of America’s flawed support of him) ultimately democracy triumphed in Taiwan…. Where Chiang’s forces fled to.
So there is something powerful about even a façade of democracy. And something inherently wrong in the purposeful imposition of dictatorship. There is a difference between a failed dictatorship and an incompetent democracy.
Once you have lived overseas half your life and watched a few revolutions, seen a few people shot in the streets, seen Chinese, Indians, working class Americans, Nepalese and Tibetans living with grace despite poverty…. There is something in the checks and balances we have in the US, despite the many flaws of our nation, which you come to respect.
I may be wrong. Perhaps America, as you say, must clean itself up before it can do anything else. Perhaps we are so tainted by the corpororati’s dictatorship over our foreign policy that we have lost the power to do good in the world. But that’s not what my guts tell me. I have spent more of my life in Asia than in America. I lived for decades without a refrigerator, car or television. Lived for years at a time without electricity. Spent as much time walking from village to village, as many Americans have spent in a car.
But I cannot forget the voice of one old woman in Nepal who said, in anger, “We are poor because you are rich.” I do not agree with her, in some ways, but I do respect the power of her belief. I love that old woman; I understand too damn well why she feels that, and it pains me to think she has good reason to feel that. And there are millions of people in Asia, Africa and South America, who agree with her completely. The reality of America’s consumption has become obvious to the billions of people who now live on a dollar a day. I have lived in their huts, carried water on my back from the village well side by side with them. So if you are tempted to dismiss my response as yahoo Americanism, please don’t.
So I came home to America a few years back because of the war clouds I see on the horizon. China is part of that coming war, but so is our level of consumption. I felt then, and feel now, a duty to repay some of what was invested in me—by the public school education I got here in this country as a kid; and by the peasants of Asia who raised me up. There must be a way for America to create wealth again, to create products again. There is more to American than just importing cheap shoes; shoes made cheap because the Chinese communist party does not allow its people to form free trade unions. Part of our engagement with China must be to enable the people of China, to show our respect for them. Rather than to let our corporati leaders use the Party as our comprador's.
Daniel, if you are right, then we are in trouble, deeper trouble than you realize.
An old Tibetan man, as he led me through the ruins of a monastery he was forced to help the Chinese blow up during the Cultural Revolution, talked to me. “If you are ever free to tell people, speak for us. The old days before China invaded, some of that was bad. No one wants to go back to that. But we hear the Dalai Lama has promised that Tibet will have democracy one day, that he does not want to bring back the old system. So if you are ever free to tell them, speak for us. We were poor before, but when the Chinese came we starved to death. The worst Tibetan government in Tibet, is better than the best Chinese Government.”
He looked at me to see how much of this was getting through to me. “Look at the marks on my wrist,” He said. “Where do those come from?” he asked, “They are from the Chinese. You are free to speak. We are not. Speak when you can!”
I feel a duty to speak out for the people in Asia who have been generous enough to speak to me; I feel an obligation to remind depressed and somewhat jaded Americans about the essential ideals of America. None of what we face is as simple, or as impossible, as people on either side of the Asia/America Bridge seem to think it is. I am a bridge person. I have tremendous respect and love for people on either end of the bridge. There is strength in America and in Asia.
Americans can walk and chew gum at the same time. So can Asians. The emergence of democracy there is as important as its rebirth in America. There is a lot to do here. There is a lot to do in the world. Working with the friends of democracy in Asia, we can do both. Just because the American corporati has besmirched the good name of democracy, that’s no reason to lose sight of the nature of the American ideal.
Michael Parenti
not mutually exclusive
The enlightened response to any either-or question is invariably BOTH!
It's not politics - its universal human rights!
Thanks for a thoughtful post Laird.
You're right - its the duty of all peaple to speak out when there's injustice happening. Whether Iraq, Chechenya or Tibet. Taking sides (whether pro anti American or anti Chinese) is so much the old paradigm. Today is the time to be 'pro human' - promote and fight for human rights regardless of geopolitical location of humanitarian crisis. Taking sides (even in a kind of a 'guilty' way Daniel does) is not an option for one harmonious world we all envisage.
I come from Poland, the country that got great help and support from America during the communist rule.
Yes - a lot of it was political and anti Russian. Yes - senior Bush was not a person with clear conscience. But helping Solidarity was a great thing that America's done. And it could be said that "American shouldn't say anything as it had your own problems and legacy of Vietnam war". But you supported us and that helped us to regain freedom. And in times of oppression, when you are against pure terror of arrests, censorship and fear, every voice of support from outside is priceless.
Since then, although being of our small role in global politics, polish people stand for oppressed everywhere around the globe - whether in Chechnya, Tibet or Iraq as we know how it is to fight for freedom against world superpower.
peace,
Lukasz
visualchemy.co.uk
Thanks Lukasz
Its good to hear this confirmed from a Pole-- I think a lot of Americans forget what an impact even the moral support of the American people can mean, to a people who are struggling for basic human rights. We are so wealthy, and so free (comparatively speaking) in this country; we take so much for granted. But anyone who has lived in the third word knows how rich America is, and anyone who has lived in Poland, or China, or Tibet, knows how free America is.
BTW Lukasz. THANK YOU for the support of the Polish PM regarding the Tibet Issue. Unless I am wrong I believe he was the first head of state to announce that he would not attend the opening ceremony in Beijing, for the Olympics this summer. Very heroic and moral stand from Poland. Now I believe several other foreign leaders have followed Polands lead-- its a nuanced position, that sends the right message to the un-elected rulers of China.
FYI-- a Polish Translation of The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama is in the works now, and should be in print within 12 months.
Laird
climate change
'At the same time, we have been the worst contributor to climate change and the biggest impediment to international protocols such as the Kyoto Accord that sought to address climate change. Our irresponsible actions in response to climate change over the last decades may turn out to be, by far, the largest "genocidal" decisions ever made, '
It seems that we are all guilty, as a global society, for climate change.
'World carbon dioxide emissions are expected to increase by 1.9 percent annually between 2001 and 2025. Much of the increase in these emissions is expected to occur in the developing world where emerging economies, such as China and India, fuel economic development with fossil energy. Developing countries’ emissions are expected to grow above the world average at 2.7 percent annually between 2001 and 2025; and surpass emissions of industrialized countries near 2018. '
'The U.S. produces about 25 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels; primarily because our economy is the largest in the world and we meet 85 percent of our energy needs through burning fossil fuels. The U.S. is projected to lower its carbon intensity by 25 percent from 2001 to 2025, and remain below the world average .'
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggccebro/chapter1.html
It seems we should be focusing on not cutting down anymore tropical rainforest.
'The accelerating destruction of the rainforests that form a precious cooling band around the Earth’s equator, is now being recognised as one of the main causes of climate change.’
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/deforestation-the-hidden-cause-of-global-warming-448734.html
It seems there is some hope -
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/million-acres-of-guyanese-rainforest-to-be-saved-in-groundbreaking-deal-801239.html
food for thought
Interestingly enough, today CNN and several other networks reported that China, not the US, now leads the planet as "worst polluter."
The distinction between China and the USA, when it comes to pollution and enviornment, may be arbitrary.
Adam Elenbaas
Half of Chinas Pollution is Made in USA
Yes, China is now the worlds largest polluter, but pause and think about that. What percentage of all the pollution generated in China is the direct result of manufacturing goods for the US and EU? I have heard one Chinese environmentalist say its as high as 60% of China's pollution. And remember, today, 30% of the air pollution in southern California comes from China, blows in across the pacific.
If goods now made in China were made in US power generation for them would be much much cleaner, and pollution footprint from manufacturing would be much smaller.
A century of progressive political reform in the US has been gutted with so called 'globalization'-- the corporations are using that code word to step around US Unions, US EPA reuglations, US FDA regulations.
And the Chinese people are being enslaved, without any free unions.... Its a disaster
Laird
i heard from an american Chinese
i heard that, people are always demonstrating in China, and that the rich people live in the cities, so out in the countryside people are as poor as ever, so the issue is not about a few Chinese kids that come to America to go to school that defend their policy, when most Chinese are in the same position as the Tibetans.
And even if you think that Tibet was a feudal system, that was liberated from Monk overlords, it was a system that was rising out of the unique situation of being in a very rarefied environment.
Here in America, we seem to be seeing all the worst backwards thinking attempting to remake reality in the image of opression IS GOOD.Good for who? It sure wasn't good for the native people that once lived in a beautiful land from sea to shining sea.It's, not good for animals, birds, bees, bats, trees, its not good for children that just want to breathe and sing and play.
Tibet will be free, when we all are.
maybe i'm wrong
Hello Daniel:
To my ears, it sounds like you're talking about a complete overhaul of our political and, to a somewhat lesser extent, social structures. You said:
"...If we could orchestrate a movement within the US and succeed in restoring dignity to our nation, ending torture and unprovoked war and becoming leaders in the global movement for effective policies on climate change while restricting corporate greed, then we would also have a great and unimpeachable basis to extend ourselves to the Tibetan people. Our first responsibility, logically, then, is to take care of the work that must be done here. Just because freedom of speech is given lip service here, we should not fool ourselves into considering ourselves "free people" at this point in time. Instead, we might consider undertaking the work we have to do to become free."
Now, I'm a friend of hard work. I love it, it's satisfying in the extreme, and I've usually got something to show for it afterward. But there's something else about hard work: it tends to take a great deal of time. What you seem to be talking about here is an enormous labor; it will be time-consuming, it will be painful, and there's no guarantee it will succeed. I agree that it must be done, and we may as well get on with it (underdog revolution, was it?). But what happens if we get to the end of this viciously hard row to hoe and find out that the rest of the farm burned down while we were working? Some of us need to work here, sure, but since we're all one organism within a larger one, some of us are going to have to go off and help other parts of it. . .
Hell, maybe I'm just rambling here, but it seems that there are so many of us, and so few of them. Is it possible that we still have the resources to spread around? Can we work on fixing the whole thing at once, instead of hoping there's nothing we have to amputate?
disengage
Apparently the Chinese
Apparently the Chinese government wants to regulate re-incarnation in Tibet.
Obviously they think they are God.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2007/08/china_to_regulate_reincar...
And the Washington Post
And the Washington Post seems to think that Tenzin Gyatso is the 16th Dalai Lama!
haha That makes me smile.
PROPAGANDA
As an American who has lived in other countries, having freedom of speech and expression is what makes me stay here. There is nowhere in the world where I feel as free to be myself, and especially as free to be a woman. We have it good here. And, while our government is in need of a major overhaul, so is everyone else’s government. We are one people, one living ecosystem, so lets help Tibet, and anyone else that we can! To Daniel's credit, I do believe he is doing that to the best of his abilities.
I’ve heard people say things like, “What’s happening in Tibet is happening everywhere in the world in some form, why should we care so much about it, why should the Olympics be boycotted because of this ‘every day’ problem?” While I don’t believe that athletes should pay the price for this rebellion (I love the Olympics), my deepest respect goes to the Dalai Lama who has pulled off the single most successful propaganda campaign in history. He has literally, with the help of Tibetans who have immigrated world wide, beaten the Chinese at their own game. He has used the system to market a spiritual cause that somehow affects everyone. I am impressed by the scope of solidarity for the Tibetans.
If what this whole uprising does is bring world-wide attention to a world-wide problem of suppression of ancient cultures and spiritual values, then a massive shift of consciousness could follow. Call me an optimist, but I have observed horrible things that were once considered the norm, become unacceptable with this kind of attention. It seems like just yesterday that I didn’t even think twice about how many times I flushed a toilet, or where all that toilet stuff went. I ignorantly assumed that it was all taken care of responsibly. I’ve never even seen “An Inconvenient Truth,” but I am really thinking about my toilet flushing these days. We, as a global population have accepted genocide of indigenous cultures as the norm long enough. I truly believe the Tibetan cause is a wake up call for everyone to take notice of the horrible things we have come to believe as normal. If they keep up this in your face marketing, we will be brainwashed for the better. Maybe tomorrow, millions of people will say, “How could suppressing indigenous rights in the name of greed/lack be considered normal? What took me so long to catch on?”