Oil Spill as Archetypal Myth

oilspill.jpg

 

In the sleeping worlds, our dreams are filled with rich symbols that give us clues as to what is on the cusp of our waking, emotional consciousness. Our emotional world follows the events of our daily lives, and we disentangle and unfurl our feelings of these events in our nightly processes.

An interesting and insightful tool to try some time is to turn your waking life inside out, examining it as an archetypal dream. Consider this: What if every character, every event and daily habitual occurrence in your waking reality was viewed through the lens of a symbolic dream? The synchronicities, the events, the challenges, and the triumphs suddenly become meaningful. And we are given the opportunity to use these symbols as a launching pad to look deeper within, overcome what is blocking us emotionally, moving onto more productive, emotionally balanced, lives.

I have a client who suddenly found meaning in the fact that her toilet broke for the fifth time, flooding the basement again. She had the profound insight that this event was symbolic of how she wasn’t processing her crap, allowing herself to get backed up and clogged emotionally. She realized she couldn’t suppress it any longer and this archetypal story was used as a fertile ground for processing her emotional trauma.

Whether or not these events are magically drawn to us because of our emotional processes or not isn’t really relevant in the end. What does matter, at least to us, is the meaning we give these events. Shit happens--no pun intended. So how do you take what is and give meaning to it, internalize your sense of control, become the hero or heroine of your story, and create something productive out of it?

Of course, there is a natural cycle of grief (Elizabeth Kubler Ross) that involves stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression and finally acceptance. Feeling victimized is an essential part of this process. But then, after the grief is processed, we move onto resolution.

If we do not have the ability or knowledge to give challenges meaning--or choose not to--our only other alternative is to languish in victimization. However, it doesn’t take long to realize that choosing to play the victim role only prolongs suffering and gets us nowhere.

I am a Jungian depth psychotherapist, as well as a visual artist, and I tend to view the world in this way--as an archetypal myth. Everything that happens to us both individually and collectively can be seen in a deeper sense as symbolic mythology. What if we took that individual waking-reality-as-dream to a collective level? What if we saw cultural triumphs, wars, and ecological disasters as symbolic of the state of humankind’s psychological and emotional state? Are we currently in the place of epidemic cultural psychoses in the West? I think so.

Currently, I see our collective psyche captivated--no, possessed--by the Archetype of the Apocalypse.

A very essential point I want to make here is to remind ourselves what mythologist Joseph Campbell repeated over and over, “Do not mistake poetry for prose.” Don’t take the myth literally. Don’t look at a story as fact--remember to keep in mind it is a story--a myth. It is from our cultural narratives that our collective reality is built. Almost like a wire frame under a sculpture--the stories we tell ourselves, individually and collectively, give us meaning and identity. Story is primary.

Whether you are a Born Again Christian or a New Age Mayan Astrologist, taking the Archetype of the Apocalypse as factual projects the shadow, creates a scapegoat. You have a convenient excuse to throw your hands up in the air with an air of nihilistic angst and sigh, “Well, it doesn’t matter WHAT we do at this point, it’s fate!”

I call bullshit.

Let’s emotionally engage, retract our cultural projections and take collective responsibility for the world we’ve all created together.

We can choose--and therefore shift--whatever archetype moves through us. Choosing to become the hero or heroine rather than the victims in our individual lives, we can choose to become the cultural heroes and heroines rather than the victims of the world’s mythical narrative.

I see the tragedy of the Oil Spill as an archetypal symbol of our collective shadow. Like the backed-up toilet I mentioned earlier, our suppression and denial of our addiction to oil--our emotional denial--cannot be ignored any longer. Our collective psyches have produced a symbol so big, so in our faces, that we cannot shove it down and suppress it any longer.

Our Mother Earth, Gaia, She who has given us literally everything is critically wounded, gushing blood from her depths. In alchemy, Solutio is the water element. And water, the ocean, archetypically represents the unconscious--what is not seen--what resides in the shadows below the radar of the conscious mind. In this moment, toxic oil is pouring out from these depths. It is, as the alchemists called it, the Prima Materia--the toxic gunk that must be healed and transformed into something useful and benign. We must go through the stages of grief--having critically wounded our Mother--take ownership and give meaning to the trauma.

We are intrinsically tied to the earth. As I said, the Earth gives us everything. There is no cutting the cord on this one. There is no alternative.

I know there’s the Manifest Destiny Archetype in which the story lulls and soothes us into believing that technology can save us. The story goes something like this: “Once we trash this place, scientists can set up some Bio-Dome on the moon for all the smart, rich, pretty people to escape to. Problem solved!”

Once again, I call bullshit.

Why is taking responsibility for our abuse of Mother Earth so difficult for us to grasp and base our future decisions on? Why are we choosing this mythology of nihilism that ultimately ends in tragedy, a collective suicide, embracing the Apocalyptic Myth? Why do we choose to repress and deny this shadow, rather than claim it and take action to change our story? Why are we killing ourselves at the expense of in-the-moment convenience? Has it just not hit close enough to home yet?

The Native Americans called the White People “Little Brother”, due to our immaturity. I imagine they liken us to rebellious teenagers--acting like we don’t need our elders, having everything figured out already. I think of teens who act like they don’t need their folks to guide them, to clothe or feed them, until that flow from the ‘rents stops--then there’s that come-to-Jesus moment of gratitude and humility.

It’s funny how we put fences and little square boxes of buildings all over Mother Earth, a childlike way of saying we own, tame and claim Her. We believe we can force Her to submit to our will.

If we choose to change the story and internalize the locus of control, give meaning to our collective trauma, the Oil Spill could give us the opportunity to recognize Mother Earth’s awesome power over us; how we have been immature and naive in thinking we could ever deny and escape that reality. We might finally awaken in gratitude for having been given this incredibly lush, beautiful world--a Garden of Eden in which we are cared for, fed, loved and given beauty and other wonderful souls to play with.

Is this the call to make the choice--in this post-hierarchical, technology-driven paradigm--to honor our Mother? What would happen if we consciously chose to create a different Cultural Mythology? Will we create an Archetypal Story that rewards cooperation with the Earth, or with her extraction and abuse? What does that look like? All of us are the bridge-makers for that dream. We are moving as global citizens into a new paradigm of cooperation, symbiosis with nature, and gentleness. This is how we’ll survive.

Part of our Cultural Archetypal Story also involves good endings--based on Fairy Tales, Disney and Manifest Destiny. The good guys win. Maybe this is part of the archetype we can choose to hold onto; what will save us in the end. It is our beliefs that triumph. And we believe the good guys will win.

It’s time to dream the future. It’s time to collectively own our shadow, the abuse we have incurred upon our Mother--own it, grieve it, and make amends. This new archetype, The Archetype of Healing the Wounded Mother sits so much better with me. How about you?

Namaste--it means the highest light in me sees and loves the highest light in you. Blessings. We have some co-creation to do!

 

Image: "BP Gulf Coast Oil Spill" by josephwenkoff, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

When Don Genaro Shits ... the Mountains Roar"

A quote from the Castaneda series.

  So many times in the series, Shaman Juan Matus would say ... "the wind is in agreement with us" ... "the crow is in not agreement with us etc etc .. not just an archetypal story .. but a true-time, moment-to-moment interactive dialog with the whole, or part of the cosmos. 

Our rational mind wants to separate the "virtual" story from the "actual" interactive science of symbiosis with all aspects of our environment. {biblical "tree of knowledge"}

That such is a standard "fact of existence" .. and not just an "esoteric metaphorical possibility" ... relative only to the individual and/or collective psyche ... may be just too much for the both the "old age" and new age mind{s} to fathom. 

How hard it is for us to ultimately transcend such self-perpetuating, probable relativities into the infinite world of quantum possibility ... till we just stand there breathless before "All That Is"

Spending all of one's precious time trying to get the story to work for us karmically ... either good or bad ...

Such 'but takes us further and further from the very "dharma of wonder" ... that keeps us all in interactive quantum flux in relationship with the "spirit" of each and every. 

the shadow knows

i removed

Joseph Campbell on the Future of Myth

This quote has been like a mantra to me the past two years, and remains one... " And the only myth that is going to be worth thinking about in the immediate future is one that is talking about the planet, not the city, not these people, but the planet, and everybody on it. That's my main thought for what the future myth is going to be. ..." -Joseph Campbell

http://sothismedias.com

 

In 100 years...

...every living human on Earth today will have (probably) died. If we could see beyond our short stay we have here, maybe someone would take responsibility for how we live. It makes me think of a house that you never intended to re-sell later down the road. "I won't be living here, so why should I keep it in good enough condition for someone else to?" Native civilizations had something we call "seventh generation sustainability." Basically it means that they would factor into their decisions how it would affect their people a couple hundred years into the future. "Will what we do today be good for our children? And their children? And theirs?"

I like the idea of taking waking experience as symbolic. I try to do it as much as possible. It helps keep you more conscious of your day to day experiences. If you look for the little synchronicities in your life, it really does bring meaning to things. Or it could give you a sense of purpose or direction - sort of a reminder that you're on the right track. I'd say this oil spill is a pretty significant indicator (both symbolic and literal) that our Mother is bleeding. How long can blood flow before She bleeds out?

 

How will it all begin..?

Thanks for posting this,

Thanks for posting this, justmike. I love the concept of "Seventh Generation Sustainability". It reflects a symbiotic and cooperative social system in contrast to the modern western culture which rewards individuality--to the point of becoming narcissistic. That thinking also takes a long term, proactive approach rather than reactive. Could that kind of thinking have prevented the oil spill? Of course. In all the tiny decisions that led to huge disaster, if Seventh Generation Sustainability decision making had been engaged, it would have turned out so differently. Thanks, I'm going to reflect on ways to engage that in my own life....

Sunny Strasburg

www.sunnystrasburg.com

A lot of a little is a

A lot of a little is a lot.  It's easy to dismiss something as trivial when you don't put it in context.  Context is really the core of this principle.  If you're always worrying about short term, instantaneous responsibility within your own little peice of the world, it can be easy to justify your actions.  But what may be making a profit for your company or benefiting your own personal well-being in some way, isn't necessarily a benefit in the grand scheme.  The big story outweighs the little story, and that ties in with the borderline (if not flagrant) narcissim present in our current society.  Humans can get so wrapped up in their own little worlds that it can place an apparent de-emphasis on the rest. 

Dying of salvationist literalism....

"The difference between a world based in Beauty and one based in a theology of Salvation is more than an interesting comparison of two cosmologies.

Cheetham shows how destructive technology is tied to Christian theology of Salvation. Drawing on the philosopher Gianni Vattimo, Cheetham shows that radical freedom is the destiny of the Christian tradition, and that such freedom makes the earth a playground of destruction.

(...) ...an incapacity to imagine that God became fully human in Christ. Fully human. For Geigerich, the incarnation of God is incarnation into a different kind of flesh than the rest of humans. Flesh from above, is, in Giegerich's view, not the same as natural flesh. It is, in effect, technological flesh. The event of this "technological" flesh has ultimately meant that abstract tech- nology is our god. (...)

The way through the nihilistic, technological world, is twofold: love, described as an initiatory process with definite and clear steps of purification and perception, and the re- sanctification of the world. And this twofold path has, in addition, to be founded in a priority of the imaginal in order to avoid making a false dichotomy between spirit and matter."

Robert Sardello, Foreword to Green Man, Earth Angel, by Tom Cheetham

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

technology

I too work with symbolism and archetypes, and relate to what's described in this piece.

Everything is paradoxical at this time. Technology seems to be part of the problem, disconnecting us from the Earth, yet it is technology that has allowed us to consciously see the Earth as a whole, and to see the scope of problems in a really profound way. If we are children of Earth, then technology is a grandchild of Earth. Technology is matter/earth, after all, and it is a vital part of the solution to what we're seeing. I believe Earth is helping us to see what's going on as a means of creating solutions. It's that powerful. There will be many, many solutions to these problems.

"we become food for the monster"

Derrick Jensen interviews Martin Prechtel:

Jensen: How does this relate to technology?

Prechtel: Technological inventions take from the earth but give nothing in
return. Look at automobiles. They were, in a sense, dreamed up over a period
of time, with different people adding on to each other’s dreams — or, if you
prefer, adding on to each other’s studies and trials. But all along the way,
very little, if anything, was given back to the hungry, invisible divinity
that gave people the ability to invent those cars. Now, in a healthy
culture, that’s where the shamans would come in, because with every
invention comes a spiritual debt that must be paid, either ritually, or else
taken out of us in warfare, grief, or depression.

A knife, for instance, is a very minimal, almost primitive tool to people in
a modern industrial society. But for the Mayan people, the spiritual debt
that must be paid for the creation of such a tool is great. To start with,
the person who is going to make the knife has to build a fire hot enough to
produce coals. To pay for that, he’s got to give a sacrificial gift to the
fuel, to the fire.

Jensen: Like what?

Prechtel: Ideally, the gift should be something made by hand, which is the
one thing humans have that spirits don’t.

Once the fire is hot enough, the knife maker must smelt the iron ore out of
the rock. The part that’s left over, which gets thrown away in Western
culture, is the most holy part in shamanic rituals. What’s left over
represents the debt, the hollowness that’s been carved out of the universe
by human ingenuity, and so must be refilled with human ingenuity. A ritual
gift equal to the amount that was removed from the other world has to be put
back to make up for the wound caused to the divine. Human ingenuity is a
wonderful thing, but only so long as it’s used to feed the deities that give
us the ability to perform such extravagant feats in the first place.

So, just to get the iron, the shaman has to pay for the ore, the fire, the
wind, and so on — not in dollars and cents, but in ritual activity equal to
what’s been given. Then that iron must be made into steel, and the steel has
to be hammered into the shape of a knife, sharpened, and tempered, and a
handle must be put on it. There is a deity to be fed for each part of the
procedure. When the knife is finished, it is called the "tooth of earth." It
will cut wood, meat, and plants. But if the necessary sacrifices have been
ignored in the name of rationalism, literalism, and human superiority, it
will cut humans instead.

All of those ritual gifts make the knife enormously "expensive," and make
the process quite involved and time-consuming. The need for ritual makes
some things too spiritually expensive to bother with. That’s why the Mayans
didn’t invent space shuttles or shopping malls or backhoes. They live as
they do not because it’s a romantic way to live — it’s not; it’s enormously
hard — but because it works.

Western culture believes that all material is dead, and so there is no debt
incurred when human ingenuity removes something from the other world.
Consequently, we end up with shopping malls and space shuttles and other
examples of "advanced" technology, while the spirits who give us the ability
to make those things are starving, becoming bony and thin, which is one
reason why anorexia is such a prob-lem: the young are acting out this image.
The universe is in a state of starvation and emotional grief because it has
not been given what it needs in the form of ritual food and actual physical
gifts. We think we’re getting away with something by stealing from the other
side, but it all leads to violence. The Greek oracle at Delphi saw this a
long time ago and said, "Woe to humans, the invention of steel."

Jensen: Why does this theft lead to violence?

Prechtel: Though capable of feeding all creation, the spirit is not an
omnipotent force, as Christianity would have us believe, but a natural force
of great subtlety. When its subtlety is trespassed on by the clumsiness of
human greed and conceit, then both human and divine nature are violated and
made into hungry, devouring things. We become food for this monster our
spiritual amnesia has created. The monster is fed by wars, psychological
depression, self-hate, and bad world-trade practices that export misery to
other places.

We inflict violence upon each other as a way to replace what we steal from
nature because we’ve forgotten this old deal that our ancestors signed so
long ago. Instead, we psychologize and objectify that relationship as a
personal experience or pathology, rather than a spiritual obligation. At
that point, our approach to spirituality becomes rationalist armoring, a
psychology of protection for the part of us that creates the greed monster,
which causes us to kill the world and each other. As individuals, we become
depressed, because the beings of the other world take it out of our
emotions....

http://hiddenwine.com/indexSUN.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Now

http://wondercloud.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/free-energy-to-silence-earth...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

I guess I'm apocalyptic...

      Another blog here suggests that the gravity (pun intended) of the rupture of the seabed is much more profound than that which will simply suggest to some, that humans should begin to care for the planet. How many disasters, from which we 'recover' will it take before a collective conscience kicks in?

      There is simply not enough time on an evolutionary scale for humans to reach a critical mass of unity consciousness. My take is definitely apocalyptic; and how many cultural and religious myths agree with me?

      The real significance of the role of the archetype in the oil spill disaster might be to end, once-and-for-all, our mind numbing complacency by causing the extermination of millions. If the warnings being given prove true, the seabed under the gulf will explode; causing an upheaval and a resulting tsunami that will instantly wipe out millions and millions of people on all sides of the gulf. Once gravity returns the seabed to its floor and seals the Earth’s wound, those left of humanity will then have to struggle with why it happened and how to survive.

      The significance of this archetype will then be fully recognized. Of all of the ‘natural’ disasters that have befallen us, and to which we have given no collective heed, in the end it will have taken the impact of a direct insult to the core of the Earth by ignorant humans to shift consensus consciousness enough to create the tipping point necessary to bring about repentance and change.

      Now THAT’s a freakin' archetype!

 

 

"The killing and dying has already begun"

“It is not a coincidence that the political party that a carried out the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire was called the Committee for Union and Progress. “Union” (racial/ethnic/religious/national) and “Progress” (economic determinism) have long been the twin coordinates of genocide.

Armed with this reading of history, is it reasonable to worry about whether a country that is poised on the threshold of “progress” is also poised on the threshold of genocide? Could the India being celebrated all over the world as a miracle of progress and democracy possibly be poised on the verge of committing genocide?

  The mere suggestion might sound outlandish and at this point in time, the use of the word genocide surely unwarranted. However, if we look to the future, and if the Tsars of Development believe in their own publicity, if they believe that There is No Alternative to their chosen model for Progress, then they will inevitably have to kill, and kill in large numbers, in order to get their way.

In bits and pieces, as the news trickles in, it seems clear that the killing and dying has already begun.”

— Field notes on Democracy Listening to Grasshoppers Arundhati Roy, Haymarket Books, 2009, pp 153

 

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Thought

In whatever sense this may or may not belong in the comments section, I'd like to share that I feel in my heart that the best thing I could hope for to happen in the next few years is nothing at all. To be rid of the stress of the approaching date will be a revelation on its own. It feels like approaching that date is like a muscle tightening, and its passage will have the effect of a muscle slackening. 

Not that that is what truly matters in light of the actual events unfolding in our daily lives.

Myths are stories, and are nice, but I plan on taking these hands and rocking with skill.

All these words are a subjective impression - peace and thanks for the article

with love

Cauzione

Great post as always.I got more useful information on this blog.. Thanks for sharing the useful information….Keep blogging. Cauzione

I doubt my archetypal dream

I doubt my archetypal dream could have ever dreampt up cocksuckers as bad as BP. All oil companies are a joke, but especially BP... they should all be arrested along with the US govt. How long ago did they cap the leak? And how many legitimate claims are still “pending” from damages they suffered back in the beginning of the summer? I happen to know three people that were affected directly by BP’s shady PR tactics and manipulation of our laws, one of whom was a journalist who was almost arrested and charged with felonies for taking pictures of oil covered animals near the coast. Not only is it bad enough that thousands of fishers’ lively hoods are ruined for god knows how many years to come, they were paid a pathetic amount of money to clean up BP’s own mess. To add even more insult to injury, BP used Corexit 9527, which contains mainly 2-butoxyethanol, which is very toxic. You wouldn’t have to be a scientist to know that, since in the first week of using it over 70 fisherman ended up at the hospital. Of course if you even inquired about this, I’m sure the govt (which is pretty much owned by oil companies) would deal with you quite quickly, let alone taking pictures of it in an attempt to run a story on it. If you didn’t know already, the govt is doing what they do best… crapping on the 1st amendment: naturalnews.com/029130_Gulf_of_Mexico_censorship.html. My friend who almost got arrested on felony charges simply went out on a boat into about 30 feet of water and used a water proof cam to photograph one of the many oil plumes forming at the bottom of the surface (which BP vehemently denies). Now here comes the hilarious part. He switched the film in his camera with a blank one in the event they were stopped by police, which they were as soon as they got back to shore. They let him go but still took his name down, and what do you know... later that night, 2 guys wearing black hoodies attempted to break into his house. He caught pics of them on his home security system (he saved the pics… adt wireless security system camera break in photos). Hmm, I wonder who paid these guys to break in and what they were after? Definitely not BP or our govt, that’s for sure!