Support our Kickstarter

The Obama Virus

YesICan_022008Z.jpg

So I believe we can say it's official: the "Yes, We Can!" Will.i.am-produced celebrity Obama love fest is viral, and since the video link landed in my inbox five different times in one day I figure it requires a response.

With so many good vibes and celebrity endorsements in one impressive eyeful should we let the images and words bubble through us like the temporary elation of a pill or cocktail? Makes one wonder if feeling good is all that is left of the Democratic platform.

The video itself is a quintessential artifact of the postmodern political system in which images are the map, and there is little left of the policy territory to explore. Politics have been reduced to toothpaste slogans, and this is certainly a clever one. The "Yes, We Can!" incantation rifts the Latin American protest chant, "Si, Se Puede!," and is not unlike Public Enemy's "Fight the Power" jingle-- yes it sounds great and meaningful, yet when you scratch the surface there is no there there (I don't mean to harp on my fave act PE, but as a media literacy dude I have to call it like it is). After watching the video, I'm still starved for meaning. Yes, we can... but what? What is it that we can do? Propel another media creature into the White House? Have hope, change... I'm sorry but these are the most hollow and meaningless words to pervade politics since the invention of television. They are no more substantial than a product claiming it is "30% more free."

Obama strikes me as the perfect PoMo politician. As a chameleon he can be many things to many people. In "Yes, We Can!" he is clearly invoking the rhetorical style of MLK. Yet this is populism without the populous, i.e. a "movement." Yes, Obama is a big phenom among certain enthusiastic throngs, but every time I examine his views, it's like poking the Pillsbury Doughboy-- my finger just moves the fat around while he giggles in response. Obama is still an organ of corporate lobbyists and fails to challenge in any fundamental way the entrenched militarism of our system. So yes, he is very good at cribbing style, and with Will.i.am at the helm, style is in abundance. Obama has found a perfect partner for the manufacture of slick imagery and corporate pseudo culture (for more on Black Eyed Peas and selling out hip hop to Snickers, read this post).

Believe me, it pains me to write these words, especially in light of the past eight years. But the "anything but Bush" alternative doesn't constitute a free pass. Neither do I enjoy slamming a popular icon, but when it comes to the Democrats, please don't check your well-cultivated critical faculties at the door. They sold us out after the last election by failing to stop the war (among many things), as was their mandate. With this monstrous political machine, you've got to keep your BS radar on full power.

In Latin American protest there is generally a clear aim, but with this dude I have no idea what it is, beyond getting elected President. I would hope that a true opposition does emerge, and it has clear aims to do something substantial about climate change and to end militarism. Until I hear stronger challenges on these fronts, yet again I will be forced to hold my nose when I pull that voting lever in the Fall. If there is anything positive to glean from this it's that once again we are challenged to remind ourselves that we are the ones we have been waiting for, and we should stop depending on people in positions of power to make the changes that all of us must make collectively.

Postscript

Maybe cool has its upside, because at least Obama has a modicum of class and taste when you compare it to Hillary's latest. It's hard to believe this video circulating the blogoshphere is nothing other than an Up With People out take. No wonder she's loosing badly down the stretch. You've got to wonder when she will escape the '90s Clinton time machine (or is it the '80s, '70s. 60s???? They don't know what era they live in). The lesson with this other video, which is highly symbolic of Clinton herself, is that when you try to be all things to all people, you become aesthetic mush, not unlike public art. Talk about a bad virus that catches on for the wrong reason. (I realize that both videos in question are "unofficial," but this may be a case of learning to judge by the friends one keeps.)

In case you are wondering if there is a political ad I do like, check this one out:

 

 

Comments

The cat in the middle

is Will I Am, the guy behind the song.

We tend to assume that if we

We tend to assume that if we change the people in charge, we can change the nation. Yet, we find that that the people who run are country are not that different from each other. Only certain kinds of people seek positions of power . once in office, where they stand on a policy is shaped by the forces of the role. Funny how presidents often turn out to be the opposite of what they wanted to be

Heh..

Unfortunately, with the dumbing down of the general populace, people are all to ready to buy into the "change" gimmick. Just turning on CNN is like being blasted by a meat-grinder of idiocy; nothing but and Obama fest, as he drives his way to office with a platform of "state as charity" rather than "state as justice". The government exists for one reason: to ensure security for the economy and the people and ensure that justice exists. Not to act as charity, which is done FAR more efficiently by NGO's that are held accountable by those that donate!

How ANYONE is excited about someone like Obama is just a mystery to me. Unfortunately, due to the Bush catastrophe, people are willing to swing so far into the opposite direction that they risk entrapping themselves in a whole different quagmire.

 

/sigh...

Echoing the Sentiment

I had a similar experience watching this video. The energy that surrounded it (Will.i.am put it together in an incredibly short period of time) was indeed the kind of active engagement that the Obama campaign is advocating and professing to be able to generate.

But.

I don't mean to downplay the importance of rhetoric and an appeal to the emotions, but at this time in history it is especially difficult for me to rally around a sentiment. George Bush catapulted into and stayed in the White House in large part because a great many people in the country "felt" he was a good man that reflected their values. I'm concerned that Obama's wave of popular support is merely the other side of the same coin. I've become an Obama supporter, but I've also found myself questioning my own motives in doing so.

The night of the Iowa primaries I had an incredibly vivid dream of a fictional (perhaps fantasy) Obama growing up in Chicago. The portrait I created was a young man who knew he had a great destiny and yet was humble, whose friends, both black and white, gathered with him, all aligned by the belief that they were enlightened enough to know that their race was not what bound their friendships, their values, their sense of purpose. I was one of these friends, and as we crouched together on a stoop on a city street, we all knew that it was Obama that would be speaking for us, representing us, eventually leading us. It was a beautiful experience, sitting there with this person, who was a peer and a friend, who we somehow knew would, because of his nobility and decency, keep our ideals alive in his ascent. There was much more to the dream, but that was the salient moment that stands out as some kind of pivot point within the dream.

I couldn't get it out of my mind after that. In fact, I had another dream about him the following night and though the details are fuzzy, it had a similar flavor and theme. My girlfriend joked that I was falling in love with him. What the hell was going on?

Was I under the spell of extraordinary marketing? Or was my unconscious compiling data on an intuitive level that fully coalesced while asleep? What does one do with such an experience and how does one weigh it against other considerations?

I hope I did not decide to support him because of this dream, but I would be lying if I said it wasn't a turning point. And yet, when I watch this video, I find myself getting annoyed, thinking, "Wishing is not enough. Hoping is not enough. Why isn't this support coming from his ideas, his platform, his credentials? Sing all you want. Are we going to sing social justice into existence? Or healthcare?"

On a certain level, I don't want to give Obama the credit that he really is committed to changing the way government works, that his priorities are more about individual rights than maintaining the status quo. It's inane, but it might be as simple as not wanting to get burned. He is a politician, lest we (I) forget and it strikes me as a colossally bad idea to think of him as above the fray.

I think the only conclusion that I can come to about all this is that these dreams, these fantasies, these feelings that arise around Obama are really much more about us than they are about him. If we are conscious of these affective processes, we can acknowledge them for what they are and proceed with and beyond them, which for me means to acknowledge my hunger for more than dreams and hopes, for specifics, for plans, for ideas, for the lumber for the house that I've been inspired to help build.

I Know I can...

As of this moment I'm still a bit vague on what Obama specifically stands for other than not being Bush.

As for the Will.i.am video...

I remember when the Black Eyed Peas didn't suck.

When they first came out, and Fergie wasn't in the group.

 And the Philipino guy actually rapped, instead of just standing in the videos and lip-synching the chorus!

haha Maaaan there are sellouts and then there are SELLOUTS! When Black Eyed Peas first came out they were on a mission. that's what they told everyone. They wanted to bring back the De La Soul vibe that had been missing in hip-hop at the time. They wanted to bring back dancing. This was like 10 years ago now. Their video was cool as hell. They could all dance, and they all Rapped.

Not just Will.i.am and Fergie singing horrible bubble gum duets. Someone's got to write a book on the ethics of selling out man. And if someone did, she could easily find a place for the Black Eyed Peas in the far reaches of Extreme Sellout! I'm sorry but it seems very difficult to justify what these people have produced in terms of music these past number of years.

The placement of Fergie in the group, I am near convinced was soome record biz ploy to get the BEP to boost lagging record sales. When they were still doing Hip-Hop. Unlike Linkin Park, the rec execs placing a singer in there group seems to have spelled doom for them.

 I do not wish to be cynical about Obama. He seems very cool. I know a lot of smart people who are diggin him. And he is a huge step forward from Bush. But I must acknowledge the possible irony of having a tired and true sellout trumpting the presence of a possible sellout.

From a Distance

Maybe I have the advantage of distance, being up in Canada. But there's something interesting about Obama, especially when and if one cares to look at Canadian politics and politicians.

At least Barack Obama has some color, some verve, some zest. By comparison Canadian politicians are about as stale, grey, mumbling and plodding as they come. With Obama at least you get a little Ceasar (no pun intended) Salad with your meal, some orange juice, some kind of zing.

Canadian politics is like being offered oatmeal, half a boiled potato, a huge, bloody slab of beef and a rusty cup of stagnant water.

And then being told that's the most nutritous meal taxpayers money has bought you.

Canada as a nation, as political body, makes itself out to be some kind of forward thinking avant-guard, "stand on guard for thee", upstanding citizen. Meanwhile in many provinces and in many ways things are right fooked.

The scary thing is that Canada, in the guise of the province of Alberta, is "managing" one of the biggest, nastiest, most destructive oil and gas industries on the planet. This is what's running the country and the political stance on this, it's fervor for oil, means everything else (environment, health care, infrastructure etc) is crumbling. Fast.

Bush, Cheney and crew loved this Canadian oil reserve, this "hidden stash". A 2003 New York Times article asked "Will Calgary Be the Next Kuwait?".

Ya catch my drift?

 

Obama doesn't come across as an oil baron. Plans and promises like the rest of 'em, sure. But his agenda feels to me more practical.

 

Anyway, I'm not so sure about the Mushy Peas' contribution to Obama's vibe, other than the fact it gets those pop drinkin', bubblegum chewin', snickers eatin' kids to turn their attention to the political process.

But yes; he's not a Bush, he's not a Clinton. It's not a repetition. If anything, it feels to me a sign of a fresh cycle. Not simply to do with presidential or political things, but something wider.

Politics and Bullsh*t aside, Barack Hussein Obama seems strangely surreal.

Larry Lessig's Take

A Shot from the Doctor

This is the most sound and thought-out look at the democratic nomination I've seen. So much better than singing celebrities!

thanks!

Yes, that is an excellent presentation. Thanks for the link.

Your argument has no foundation.

1. Will.i.am is not a politician. 2. He is not part of Obama's campaign. 3. The video is there to provoke thought and interest in probably the biggest campaign in decades. Sure, Black Eyed Peas sold out. Who cares? So did just about every other group you've got on your iPod. But the fact is, they're an influential group in the media and they're using their power to do some good; show youtube freaks and teenagers that there is some good in politics and maybe they can get into it. 4. Where's the substance in that video you're trying to endorse? It's edgy. It's kind of boring to the point that maybe someone will look it up if they get around to it. But what more? I'm sorry but posting that video contradicted your ENTIRE argument; an argument that was unconvincing to being with. 5. Next time you try to write an article, include a few facts. Strict opinion has little to no persuasion for readers. This article is just as fluffy as you claim that video is.

If you don't know

Maybe you should LOOK

wanderlust

 

On second thought

So, I'm going to eat my words a little. I live in Italy and have been watching Obama through the filter of the media, hence my commentary on how he is presented as a creature of media. It appears that he is indeed progressive on many important issues, and perhaps he has high moral standards. This doesn't mean, though, we should not be skeptical of any propaganda or how language frames issues. I want to be clear that just because you say something the right way, or frame issues to sound good, be extremely cautious because words are not a substitute for organizing or action. With that said, I wish Obama good luck and progressives good will in the upcoming election.

There are many reasons to

There are many reasons to support a politician. I support Obama because I share many views with him on issues, but because I find his message positive in a time where that is hard to come by. It's true that there is more inspiration than specifics in his speeches, but you should do the research on what he stands for before criticizing him. No one is perfect and one politician isn't going to complete re-do the American political system. But it is my belief that Obama is a step in the right direction.

FYI

I did research his position on the military and there is some interesting information about his desire to increase the military budget; he does support war, just the right kinds of war; and his is staunch supporter of Israel. Additionally, he has not committed to cutting ties with private mercenary armies (Blackwater, et al). It's also not clear to me how the draconian anti-terror laws will be repealed. These are not visionary or progressive positions, and my criticism was founded on the belief that no matter who we vote for, we are still voting for who will run the empire, and we're given a choice of whether it has a friendly or a crooked smile, thus the word "change" needs to be scrutinized. I do feel right in pointing out that the Democrats-- and he would be representing that Party-- are historically spineless and cave to fear politics and military issues every time. So yes, vote for Obama, but again, please don't toss your critical faculties out the window, and keep pressing and challenging the Democrats, no matter how good they are ate framing the issues. Militarism has a knack for masking how deeply its pernicious, insidious claws are dug into the core of our democracy. While words and images can make us feel really good and flatter us, we must continually ask ourselves, what will it take to truly end militarism? For more on militarism and alternatives, watch this interesting video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=33JC0lZ2xgA Here's an interesting interview with Obama's foreign policy adviser, Samantha Power. http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/25/barack_obamas_senior_foreign_polic...

Beyond Policy

don't toss your critical faculties out the window

Yes. True.

One thing I find interesting regarding Obama's "foreign policy" or "stance on war/military" and so forth, is the point made by Lessig in the presentation linked above.

I'm paraphrasing, but he comments on the positive manner in which Barack Obama would likely be percieved by someone living in Iraq or middle eastern countries.

Whatever his "Official Policy" is, his presence and background is far less threatening than   crusading-oil-baron-finger-pointing-white-men.

And that would count for a lot.

kudos

This was a great post and I (re)registered with this site just to make a post. Yeah here are my beefs too - Obama has no solid issues or ideas, it seems to me, other than being different than Hillary.. just another politician. Don't get me wrong, I'd go for Barack anyday overy Hillary, but Will.i.am?? Come on. The guy is a joke. All that aside, I was pleased to see your fellow appreciation of Mike Gravel - I was and still am a big supporter of him -- too bad this backwards country requires huge amounts of money to get any kind of recognition. Gravel would have fixed this country in every way, he would have been a REAL president and not just some corporate goon. Another mistake and loss for America, overlooking Mike Gravel. Maybe someday people here will get a clue. It matters little to me since I am moving to Canada to hopefully escape much of this bullshit.

Do some reading

I hope you don't still feel that way 3 weeks later. Really folks, all you have to do is go to a candidate's website to find out their plans for their presidency. Obama's views are all laid out - as are his plans and hopes for America on his watch. There is no mystery. Saying Obama has no solid issues or ideas is simply buying into the propaganda by his opponents. As for this video, as was stated above very well, this video is not an official Obama video and has nothing to do with Obama's campaign, officially. In my opinion, the article is weak and silly, but there are some very nice comments listed here. Obama is  very intelligent man and would be a huge upgrade from what the world has had to endure the last 7 years! Oh, and don't kid yourself, Canada has it's own share of bullshit.

Grim Up North

Dreamhump: Canada aint no utopia either. As I mentioned above, the political situation here is pretty darn grim.

A "person of political power" has repeatedly mentioned that he is "not going to touch the brakes" where it concerns the economy of oil and gas up here. He's got the pedal to the floor, staring at the rear-view mirror and apparently doesn't see or care that a serious brick wall is up ahead.

That sums up Canadian politics.

PPS

I have to admit that I am depressed that Hillary is bouncing back.

Bouncing Billary's Low Blow

Yes, it's annoying. Especially as part of it is due to unscrupulous Canadian political antics.

There are accusations that the Canadian government leaked a memo concerning Obama advisor Austan Goolsbee's comments about NAFTA and free trade.

article here  and here 

"Goolsbee said his comments were misinterpreted, and Obama denied offering the Canadians any such ideas. "Nobody reached out to the Canadians to try to assure them of anything," Obama told reporters Monday in Carrollton, Texas"

Personally I don't buy the accusations.

My feeling is it's another one of those twisted "Roveian" moves and outright lies descibed by Lessig in his presentation linked above.

Obama's got some wind at his back, so out come more low blows and false accusations.

"The affair has been dubbed NAFTA-gate by Ms. Clinton's campaign..."

What an obvious, overblown way to stir up hype and dirt.

"Mr. de Mora described Mr. Goolsbee as indicating that the anti-NAFTA rhetoric "should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans." Mr. Goolsbee said he never said that, noting the memo was in Mr. de Mora's words."

"Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has disputed the suggestion that his government was trying to complicate Obama's chances or favor Republican Sen. John McCain, who strongly supports NAFTA."

Do we really elect our president anyway?

Not meaning to derail the discussion or deny the fine points mentioned previously, but after all the voting irregularities and overwhelming suspicious election events in 2004, I've lost all confidence in the US electoral process. I'm sure most of you are versed in those events, but if not, one of the most compelling sites I found about this is by Chuck Herrin. Be sure to check out the links to empathy training for liberals or empathy training for compassionate conservatives . I will still 'vote' in November, and while I would have preferred to be able to vote for Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, Obama is my next choice. But let's face it, given the current opaque election process we have, only a politician who has sold out to corporate / Illuminati / NWO interests can 'win' this game.

Well. . .Obama is still a pawn!

As far as political endeavors go, the only one I have seen this election cycle that has hit the nail on the head is Ron Paul. He is taking on the whole Establishment, most notably the currency cartel(federal reserve) that has put us into a current economic crisis, and also the military-industrial complex. sure, Obama is intelligent and is a good speaker, but where is the real substance? How does he really differ from any other Elitists? Keep in mind he voted to continue the Patriot Act, a wholly abhorrent piece of paper to anyone who enjoys the freedoms wrought from political ideology. Ron Paul represents more what people want from a politician, it's just that he's not very charismatic, is of a much older generation, and doesn't know how to communicate his message in the small amount of time given him by the media. He's an intellectual type, and does not try to "sell" himself like every single other candidate.

When Obama starts talking

When Obama starts talking about dismantling the Fed through competitive currencies, ending pirvacy invasions, allowing true free trade as opposed to government intervention, stopping all needless wars, dismantling the MIC, cutting aid to all countries none spared, resisting entangling alliances, preservation of strict constitutionalism and personal responsibility. . .THEN he'll have my vote!!!

 

The truest vision I've had for America is where the people maintain awareness of government activities and actually live the idea that "the people ARE the government!" No one keeps tabs on these politicians, not enough people do atleast, and it's been like this for over a century now, we're in real bad shape. Obama isn't going to do a DAMN thing to stop the coming economic crises, and if you don't believe there is one coming well I can prove it to you in more than one way!, and neither will McCain or Hitlery.

 

Who else will bring all of our troops home? Especially the ones sitting in bases in over 100 countries such as Germany, Japan, and Korea??? All that needless spending, for what? Occupation is the name of the game, and we're letting it happen.

 

This mess is our own damn fault, and unfortunately not enough of us have a good idea of the bigger picture, nor enough compunction to do a damn thing about any of it. The rest of you are leaving your head in corporate sand. America has the potential of being a people-regulated, enlightened society, lighting the darkness of human oppression and leading the way for the rest of the world, potentially creating this "world peace" that so many claim to know something about. America has that potential, and we're fucking squandering it!!! You think Obama is gonna save our ass??? Hell, even if Ron Paul WERE to win the election, and not get shot at any point, we'd STILL have a tremendous job to do getting this country up to constitutionally inspired standards.

 

America should be pushing all alternative technologies, energy sources, and spreading the awareness of sustainable living, but alas, we have long been subverted by the Ahrimanic influence of "buy more" and the charlatanry of decievers.

 

It looks quite grim here in the States, and still, it is the best country in the world. . .

I rebute my previous statement, w/conditions

Propaganda Anonymous I am now in support of Obama If he gets the Democratic bill I will vote for him. What finally tipped the scale for me was the 'More Perfect Union' speech. That being said, he is not 'the perfect candidate' And no one is. If he wins I will still protest some or most of his actions. Shieeeet. Even Billy Bragg believes in strategic voting

see, but that is just what

see, but that is just what is wrong with politics in this country, just that phrase "strategic voting" makes me sick!

 

stand up for what, and who, you believe in! Obama is a good talker, but what else has he got? Some scandals that are waiting to burst the pipes, support for the terrorist state of Israel, what else?

 

I wish we had no party system at all, and instead there was an agreed upon requirement to run for presidency. That way every single American has to do there homework on 15+ candidates every four years! I also think that debates should take place for atleast 4hours at a time, giving candidates enough time to really say something, and not enough time to rely on soundbites.

 

Charisma means a lot in presidential races and that's too bad, because charisma is shallow. Hitler had charisma, but what did he represent?

 

People in this country are to uneducated, apathetic, and dis-empowered to make informed decisions. That is a glaring generalization. . . ;-)

Declare Independence!!!

This is the only political article I've ever read that has made me laugh out loud! KUDOS! American politics is BEYOND hopeless.

There are alien civilizations- both good and bad- that have imprinted their will on this planet in ways that are materially manifesting, including how the Illuminati got bribed by the bad aliens who want to use humanity as their own personal resource. Guess what the American government got out of it??? Money and Power!!! Who knows what the bad aliens wanted? Dead bodies on the battlefield? Entry to planet Earth in a way where they had ties and connections to beings (the government) who have bodies and therefore can enact more change on this planet than purely 5th dimensional beings without bodies?

Because the economy is dependent on militarism, the only hope we have for anti-militarism is if the American economy completely crashes, which I think we should all look at as a blessing in disquise when it happens which it already slowly is. An internal sense of abundance for the things that really matter in life stand us in good stead as peak oil looms and the economy plummets. This year in the Mayan calendar is about deprogramming the mechanistic sense of lack that has haunted humanoids. Be the abundance of the universe without resorting to the identification of money as abundance.

We need to form our own government or maybe a gooberment! Forward-thinking Anarchists and Socialists and maybe even Libertarians will  self-organize in ways that are more in line with the energy of the group, granted there's an overall structure or anti-structure that somehow leaves room for all possibilities.

I personally pledge allegiance to the Galactic Council that anti-authoritatively governs all doings in the universe and includes all benevolant aliens races: Pleidians, Sirians, Arcturians, included. But you know, that's 'cause I'm Sirian and only 16% humanoid. Damn those hybrids!