Atlanta's Drying Lesson: Building Community from Crisis
ST Frequency
In the first weeks of October this year, Atlanta residents were inundated with press reports warning that their municipal water supply had dropped to critical levels. The crippling drought that had set in over the sweltering summer months was taking its toll on Lake Lanier, the city’s primary source of drinking water, and worried officials were sounding the alarm. Carol Couch, head of Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division, declared a level four “exceptional” drought for much of north Georgia, banning most outdoor watering and bringing the crisis to the attention of metro Atlanta’s more than 5 million citizens. News of the water shortage quickly spread across the country, as Atlanta-based CNN and other national media picked up the story, broadcasting dramatic photos of the 38,000-acre reservoir’s receding waterline and muddy, debris-strewn shores.
Yet, for all the clamor and urgency of the headlines, life goes on as usual for most Atlantans. Commuters regularly clog the epic sixteen-lane “Downtown Connector” each morning and afternoon, fighting their way between city jobs and homes in far-flung suburbs. Visitors continue to mob the observation tanks at the Georgia Aquarium, touted as the largest in the world when it opened two years ago. Passenger jets crisscross the skies above the world’s busiest airport, Hartsfield-Jackson International, serving some 240,000 travelers daily.
These days, arriving fliers might happen to catch a glimpse of a desiccated pond just before touching down. Located just twenty miles from the tarmac, the shriveled George H. Sparks Reservoir, chief water supply to the city of East Point, bears testament to the severity of the “hundred-year” drought gripping the southeast.
In fact, such happenstance direct encounters are the only connection most Atlanta residents might make with the looming water crisis. While landscaping outfits and nursery owners have felt the pinch of conservation measures, clean, cheap water still gushes freely from the taps. It’s easy to understand the complacency that presides, even as the state’s precious reservoirs dwindle. After all, what is a “drought,” really, but a long stretch of sunny days? If this is what a disaster looks like, life is indeed easy. But like many of the sneaky environmental catastrophes currently brewing on the planet, the record-breaking dry weather across the southeast poses a hidden and growing threat for the future. As Georgia’s state climatologist David Stooksbury puts it, a drought is like the Rodney Dangerfield of natural disasters – it gets “no respect” until things get serious.
This is not to say that the local media is ignoring the story. In contrast to the carefree vibe on the street, a series of doom-and-gloom scoops on the mounting crisis have cropped up in recent months throughout the city’s newsrooms. To those inclined to seek out such “depressing” information, a cursory web search will dredge up several ominous-looking news sites dedicated to Georgia drought coverage. One of the most popular statistics across these various channels is a calculation of days remaining until a water level of 1,035 feet AMSL (Above Mean Sea Level) is reached at Lanier. This magic number arises when the last drops of conservation pool water are released into the Chattahoochee River through Buford Dam. Beneath this, reports have suggested, lies a hundred or so feet of difficult-to-access, bacteria-laden water never intended for human consumption – otherwise known as the "dead pool."
Early on, the media seized on this figure as an apt device to gauge the urgency of the crisis. Dead pool “countdown clocks” popped up on numerous websites, ticking off the days of drinking water remaining for the fastest growing metro area in the US. Yet from source to source, the numbers varied significantly based on the calculation formula used, adding an air of confusion to the tense situation. What would seem the most official estimate, provided by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) who manage the federal lake, jumped wildly from 375 to 79 over a single week in November. To anyone attempting to follow this situation, these conflicting, erratic figures are frustrating at best. At worst, they suggest the total incomprehension and incompetence of the folks in charge – a troubling possibility in post-Katrina America.
Regardless of the actual dead pool date, it remains entirely unclear what it would mean for Atlanta if this critical juncture were eventually reached. Neither the city or state government, nor the ACE, have been willing to elaborate plans for a worst-case scenario. Atlanta running out of water, they allege, is too unlikely an event to warrant serious discussion. Such blithe shrug-offs from Georgia officials stand in odd contrast to the recent grandstanding by Governor Sonny Perdue, who made headlines with a tent-revival prayer service on the Capitol steps to petition the Lord for stormy weather. (It rained a little the next day, as predicted in forecasts a week out.) Surely things must be dire when government officials are invoking God to bail them out. If Atlanta faces emergency conditions, as Governor Perdue declared in late October, how can there be no contingency plan? What is going on here? Is anyone minding the store?
Enter Mickey Mellen, a 31-year-old webmaster at a church in suburban Marietta, Georgia. Like many metro Atlantans, Mellen started paying close attention to news reports in mid-October about the “historic” drought that threatened the city’s water supply. Turning (of course) to the Internet, he did some searches to satisfy his curiosity about the developing crisis. Soon, he had more questions than answers. “People kept saying we needed rain,” recalls Mellen. “OK, that’s great. But what would an inch of rain mean? The answer didn’t exist.”
Amid conflicted politicians and inconsistent data, there was no central source of dependable information on the drought. Mellen quickly got to work. “I already had my own server,” he says, “so I figured, what the heck, I’ll start a blog about this and try to consolidate everything.” Atlantawatershortage.com (or AWS, for short) launched on October 16th with an inaugural entry that called out an Atlanta-Journal Constitution reporter for some sloppy math in a story flaunting the city’s conservation efforts. A series of posts the following day contrasted differing weather reports, shared water-saving tips from Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin, and attempted to crack the science behind Lanier’s declining level.
Before long, the site began attracting some loyal visitors. Curious, concerned, and sometimes quarrelsome readers converged on the blog, offering their own bits of expertise and speculation. A posting that fell, appropriately, on Halloween asked the frightening question on everyone’s mind: “How much water is really left in Lanier?” Twenty-five comments explored various angles of the problem, yet no real answers emerged. Undaunted, Mellen posed it again a few days later, inviting those “mathematically-inclined” to give it a go. A couple of industrious posters bearing the usernames “wspurlock” and “rkolter” accepted the challenge, hashing out the data and swapping URLs in the newly-added forums. A St. Louis-based comuputer scientist and self-professed "geek at heart," rkolter developed a line graph charting the fill-rate of Lake Lanier over time, drawing from years of elevation data maintained by the Corps. This model could then be used to make predictions on how quickly Lanier will drain. At last, concerned citizens had a timeline they could reference that was accountable to hard numbers. Mellen devoted a blog post to the chart, for all to see.
As the water continued to flow from Lake Lanier, visitors to atlantawatershortage.com swelled to an average of 1,500 a day. "The traffic's been astounding, to me at least," says Mellen, "with just a default WordPress template and a schmoe that knows nothing, talkin' about water." Yet for a bunch of amateur hydrologists, the crowd at AWS was starting to amass some impressive data. Mellen began receiving solicitations for interviews, including a request from a newspaper based in Japan. Local journalists took notice as well, frequenting the site to respond to concerns about their reporting.
To keep track of all the accumulating information, Mellen set up a wiki, open-source style for public management. Rkolter took charge of a “Predictions” page, tracking all of the disparate dead pool countdowns with regular updates against the changing estimates of his own model. A glossary of terminology was included, as well as a primer on the 50-year history of the man-made lake at the heart of the controversy. All the while, the newsy blurbs on the main page expanded in scope to reflect a growing awareness of water scarcity as a complex global issue. Readers from drought-ravaged Australia and Las Vegas shared conservation tips with beleaguered Georgians. Discussions of sustainability and alternative energy cropped up in debates over water allocation between states, underscoring the contentious role this resource is sure to play in the years to come.
Then came a truly watershed moment. A poster called “John” confirmed some readers' suspicions that the dreaded dead pool might not mean the sudden end of Atlanta’s water supply, after all. Paraphrasing a telephone conversation with Michael Lapina, an Army Corps of Engineers official at Lanier’s Buford Dam, John reported that the water releases always flow out from a gate at 919 AMSL – from the bottom of the dead pool. Previously, the consensus opinion of the media (and the AWS community) rested on a belief that dead pool water would require special treatment and equipment to bring it to Atlanta’s taps. Instead, they were now informed, if lake levels drop below the magic 1,035 elevation, only the capacity to generate electricity will be disrupted, due to insufficient "head pressure" on the turbines; Atlanta will still have more than 100 feet of easily obtainable drinking water remaining in the reservoir.
So, why all the dire countdowns? And what about all the reports equating the dead pool with filthy, inaccessible water? There must be some misunderstanding. “Well, I spoke with someone from the army corps,” asserts John, “and he told me the media are idiots. I agree with him.”
Despite the fact that another hundred feet of available water is assuredly great news, it came with a tinge of exasperation. A post by rkolter summed up the mood succinctly: “Just when we think we have an answer, something else confusing comes along. *sigh*”
After checking the details with Lapina, Mellen added a humble retraction to his blog. “So maybe the dead pool isn’t so bad,” read the title, followed by a careful explanation of the new information. Yet even bolstered by this surplus of water, Mellen insists, Atlanta still faces an uncertain future: “With a dry winter predicted, things could get really ugly by spring.”
The dead pool revelation (if indeed accurate) is not so much a crisis averted, but protracted; Atlanta's profligacy and Lanier's federally-mandated water releases continue at unsustainable rates, and the drought is projected to deepen into next summer. In the meantime, readers of atlantawatershortage.com will undoubtedly maintain their vigilance against an indifferent public and a misinformed press – and in the stark absence of guidance from civic leaders. Out of the dregs of a dying lake, a far more pressing emergency has surfaced: a crisis of faith in the ability of our hallowed institutions to inform, protect, and serve the people.
It is painfully clear, in these hectic times, that strong communities must rise up and take control of their own knowledge and security. As new crises emerge and crumbling systems buckle under their weight, it will be increasingly up to these rooted, dynamic collectives to assume primacy over the failures of the past. With hope, one day soon the rains will return and wash it all away.
Image credit (teaser): "Lake bed" by digitalens, used under Creative Commons license.
Image credit: "No boats" by mjn9, used under Creative Commons license.
- ST Frequency's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version





Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
Thanks ST
I'd been wondering what Atlanta's situation was since the “emergency” just seemed to disappear from TV broadcasts. Thanks for doing my research for me so I can pursue other tangents. I’m really grateful for all the information I get from Reality Sandwich.
That having been said, the Atlanta controversy seems to parallel others of late. I get the impression that someone would have me believe that everyone in charge is an imbecile; that it has taken their entire career to rise to their particular level of complete incompetence--from the president, on down. Every newsworthy event seems to reinforce this impression in me. Is this really possible?
Or, could there be an intelligent and organized conspiracy to cause widespread confusion among the populace leading eventually to total ambivalence? I mean, why ask? When you know the answer can’t be trusted?
Thankfully, if such a conspiracy is the disease, then the Internet, as you have demonstrated, is the cure. I think this, in effect, is really what I’m thanking you for showing me.
Hi Don, Thanks for your
Hi Don,
Thanks for your comments. If you want to express your gratitude for Reality Sandwich's content, please assist in the growth of this enteprise, if you can. We just introduced a huge number of new tools - Digg, Delicious, RSS, etc - that can help to grow our readership and disseminate the ideas and information on our website. If you like what you read, please take a few minutes to pass it along to others!
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
the new normal
I appreciate your use of ironic quotation marks around words like "exceptional" and "hundred-year" describing the drought. It is very likely that it isn't exceptional at all; it is the new normal.
I once had a student who said in class, "As long as I can get a big mac, coke and fries for under five dollars, to be honest I really don't care about the environment." And as long as water comes out of the spigot, will anyone care about the drought when their lives are so separated from nature? Why should they care? As for the future, surely science will think of a solution. The prevalence of this kind of attitude is what plunges activists into despair.
In fact, many activists secretly hope for a calamity to happen that will awaken people. They are disappointed that the dead pool isn't going to be a problem after all. They were disappointed that Y2K didn't materialize, and that Peak Oil hasn't struck yet, and maybe they'll be disappointed when 2012 comes and goes as well.
Nonetheless, there is something significant and valid in this sentiment. Really it is a desire for transcendence -- a dissatisfaction with the lesser lives and less beautiful world that we have come to accept as normal. I'm going to talk about this more in my next RS post I think... in the meantime, happy holidays everyone!
Charles Eisenstein
www.ascentofhumanity.com
Visionary crisis
I'll admit, I too was a bit discouraged to discover that the dead pool might not mean the 11th hour for this crisis. But in this case, my frustration comes from many sources. For one, it emphasizes the truly confounding incomprehension that surrounds the Atlanta water crisis as reported by official channels. As I state in the article, I see this as a much more unsettling scenario for the safety of the public.
But on another level, I will have to agree with you about the tendency for activist-minded folks to secretly yearn for the "Big One" to hit, and wake people up. Daniel touched on this notion here before, arguing that such desires are rooted in a Christian-apocalyptic wish to see the bastardized world pay penance for its transgressions, to bring atonement and usher in a new Eden from the ashes. His argument against this mindset is persuasive, suggesting that these thoughts have a potency and might serve darker forces, when instead we might focus on ideals of peaceful transitioning. Yet I've also noticed hints of cautious doomsaying ekeing out in more recent posts, indicating that this internal battle is a difficult one for those of us studying these dire phenomena.
Perhaps there's some sort of selfish desire involved to feel vindicated for raising the alarm about a cause most people view as silly or paranoid – the Chicken Littles vs the clucking masses. Yet more often, I associate these subconscious desires with a sense that it will likely take abominable circumstances to break the collective trance of humanity. If we are to become an enlightened society in the end, it may need to grow darker before the dawn...
-st
2012ishness
Hi ST and Charles,
Drats - I had tried to post a reply to Charles' comment a few days ago, but somehow it didn't post.
Charles, I am sure you agree that the "new normal" is not a sustainable situation. If something is unsustainable, it will eventually not work anymore. The question, then, is how long can the entrenched system keep plugging its fingers into the myriad of holes that keep opening up in the ecological, social, financial, technological dam. It may be that the system has enough resilience to keep the dam functioning for quite a while - we just don't know.
Probably on the financial front, for instance, a number of closed-door deals are being struck right now, to make the downshift of the US economy into a slow-motion process, with the hope that the multitude will remain too distracted and numbed to realize what is happening. Environmental crises may be more difficult to handle, but probably can be managed to a certain extent, at least for a time. Absolutes such as food supply or energy prices, however, could catalyze global awareness and real insurrections.
(It occurs to me, while writing this, that "disinfo" can also not be ruled out, in the case of the Atlanta drought and elsewhere. Years ago, I wrote a piece for Esquire about the decline of the sperm count and reproductive cancers multiplying due to chlorinated pesticides and plastics. At the same time, The New Yorker ran a piece on the subject. Suddenly, television began to cover the issue. At that point, a report was issued comparing the sperm count of men in New York and LA, apparently showing that NY men had a higher sperm count. I am certain that this was brilliantly orchestrated disinfo - obviously, media cannot cover 2 sperm count stories at the same time, so which one are they going to use? The fun and catchy one or the depressing and insoluble one? The workings of "spin" deserve some future articles here. The Internet, where unsubstantiated rumors can proliferate via anonymous blg posts, is a perfect place to spread disinfo).
As Charles notes, my personal psychology is oriented toward transcendence, apocalypse, and redemption. I try to factor that in when I explore these areas, and leave a proper opening for skepticism and doubt - my own and other peoples'. On the other hand, many factors point toward this being a definitive "make or break" time for humanity. If 12/21/12 turns out to be less "The Eschaton" and more a meme and mythic signifier that helps to catalyze positive transformation, that would be a great thing.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
disinfo
Ed Ayers' discussion of disinformation in God's Last Offer made it clear in my mind how self-interested media saboteurs pose a constant threat to public knowledge and security.
How are you suspicious, if at all, that disinfo is involved in the Atlanta water crisis? I wonder if something about the situation jumped out at you. Several people on AWS have mentioned feeling there might be some purposeful campaign to muddy the coverage with conflicting information, but I can't figure to what end this would be intended...
-st
Wake up, georgia.
Well researched article. Which brings up more questions for us that will ultimately confuse the general population down here in Georgia. Unfortunately I think the south has very little concept of the environment. We still don't have recycling as a norm. Most folks down here don't even think of the environment except to say: "that's for hippies, ain't it?". I think it will take much more than a few articles with dubious facts, and a political leader invoking the gods with a rain spell to wake people up.
i agree
i admit that i hope for some big event to take place in order for our society to wake up as it were, and move on already! and arrive at a new era of true freedom. only i start to become afraid should anybody get hurt by such an event. yet, along the same lines as st had put it, perhaps we need to experience some darkness in order to arrive at the light. that really resonated with me.
another question is, if such an event or events started to take place, how can we keep ourselves centered throughout. it might sound ridiculously simple, but jose arguelles alluded to how if we feel any fear at all, the best way to combat any type of fear is to substitute it with peace...any type of fear may be extinguished if you choose peace, and that that is one of the first steps to transcendence.
thanks st and charles, and i await the articles that expand more on this subject, as i feel that many people aware or unaware are feeling the same thing more or less.
peace and light.
A brief history of Georgia's water woes
The Atlanta-Journal Constitution recently published this comprehensive overview of the tribulations and failures that have led to Georgia's current crisis.
It's a great read.
-st
"Just immediate thirst"
Great read! I immediately noticed the following quote, which pertains to some of the comments below:
"We will get real serious about it, and then it gets to raining, and we forget about it," Hill said. "And then there will be drought again, and we will question ourselves.”
If this is an example of a concensus reaction to the “new normal”, then the frog could stay in the slowly warming pot for some time to come, while humanity adjusts to small shifts in its survival stratagies until a tipping point occurs, and maybe the frog dies. If not, the frog's habitat is now much less habitable.
In order for me to accept the possibility that a sudden and massive die off caused by catastrophic events might stimulate the frog to come to its sences and survive, while its habitat remains somewhat preserved, I recognize that I must be willing to risk being part of the die off.
So be it.
"If only I could remember the future"who is the poster called
who is the poster called John, who was speaking with the Army Corps of Engineers?
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
"John" (doe?)
That's what I thought you were getting at. Actually, John's "revelation" was more of a confirmation of suspicions we were actively discussing about how the dam makes releases. People were posting pictures that showed the drain gates at a low elevation, and others had been suggesting what "John" then confirmed with a phone call to the ACE. But, as I point out, then Mickey also called the Corps to verify what John was telling us, before he made his official blog post. So, it's kind of moot. If you're curious, you can view the thread where all this is hashed out.
Perhaps the Corps are involved in spreading disinfo to quell fears about hitting dead pool, but if so, I am unsure why it hasn't come up yet in the mainstream media. And if the dead pool revelation is 100% accurate, as we're assuming now, you'd think Atlanta's politicians would be wise enough to dispell fears of imminent disaster by clearing up the facts – that it truly is not a concern for drinking water supply. The fact that this hasn't happened only makes them seem more incompetent in my eyes.
-st
Good stuff
Propaganda Anonymous Great piece ST. At the risk of appearing tangential, I'd just like to lightly approach a couple of the points Charles raised about activism and hope for a great crisis.
Firstly, it seems important for me to draw some distinctions between the different types of 'Activists' there are. For instance, I really don't think Civil Rights Activists in the 50s and 60s were waiting for some big ole crisis event to happen where there would be a massive consciousness shift. The consciousness shift took years and years of hard struggle. And we are still working through that particular gestalt.
To concede a bit to Charles' comment, maybe the Environmental movement of old toed that line of waiting for the other shoe to drop, so people will finally wake up. Extrapolating that to the extreme I think of some of the stuff that John Zarzen seems to get into in his Anarcho-primitivist perspective and bumper-stickers that read, "Save a Tree, Kill yourself"
So briefly, I just wanted to make some distinctions in the term "Activist" here. Where there have obviously been different Types of them within a Class of Activism (If I'm to get all Bertrund Russel with it)
Those in the Civil Rights Era Activism were engaged in "The Struggle"
This struggle going back so many years. And what if we are all involved in this Struggle. And this Struggle has no alliegience to Linearity? Meaning Time-Space, Every where, Every When the moment is Now?
Foucalt's criticism of Linear structures and Hierarchy may be so on point.
Looking towards Eco-Feminism as perhaps now the proper focal point, we see these Linear and Hierachical structures causing half of the problems. (In activism, in the world, in witty tit-for-tat vis-a-vis mano-y-mano debate)
Anyway, if this 'Struggle' is always occuring, we are riding by the seat of pants continually.
Exisiting within the Paradox, and still trying to save the world, it may come down to Choice.
does one choose to envision a world where we don't necesarily have to plunge deeper and deeper into the dark night, just to reach that early dawn?
Addendum
Got them/us thinking
new years resolutions
The media will always seize on a calamity. In this case, perhaps some good will come in the fearmongering, even if it is premature. Those that are inclined to conserve water are mobilized by these dire predictions. The consciousness shift towards comprehending resource scarcity is often a lasting one.
Yet even with recent rainfall in Atlanta, the enduring scenario is one of limited reservoir storage in a region of rapid development and population growth – and against weather trends towards drier conditions. If drought persists, as climatologists predict, Atlanta will likely face catastrophic water scarcity in the near future. The inordinately complex relationship between modern progress and natural water systems has been long neglected in Atlanta, and the steps to redress past negligence are politically disadvantageous in the short-term. In the long-term, however, the situation is devastating. It would take a selfless visionary to turn things around at this point -- a long-shot hope, but one worth imagining as we move into a new year...
It's raining in Atlanta
I wonder if there’s a real connection between the following two patterns of thinking: The mass subconscious intuition for the short-term viability of the status quo, and the shortsighted political reactions to the gathering crisis?
If there’s nothing to prevent the ship from sinking, why NOT argue about how to rearrange the deck furniture? It’s distracting enough to prevent a mutiny, which, the Capitan knows will lead only to chaos.
"If only I could remember the future"