Sign Up Now
Login/New User




Arts

Hollywood: The Next Record Industry

Douglas Rushkoff

To watch the AMPTP (movie and TV producers) disinformation campaign against the Writers Guild of America (screenwriters) is to watch a replay of the record industry's profit-motivated suicide of the 1990's.

The record industry saw the advent of digital media storage (CD's) as a chance to commoditize their product. They would charge more to consumers (even though CD's cost less than records to produce) and pay musicians less. It looked rosey for a moment. CD sales spiked shortly after their invention, as boomer-age consumers replaced their record collections with CDs. This motivated major media conglomerates to absorb the attractive balance sheets of the record industry. The labels became divisions of conglomerates, where Wall Street analysis replaced any regard for talent or quality. They didn't realize that the sales spike was simply the replacement of old product, and didn't think to develop new talent. They wouldn't even have known how.

The emergence of NAPSTER and other file-sharing was seen as a threat (or even an excuse for poor sales) rather than an opportunity to generate new ones and new revenue streams. Unfamiliar with music, these corporations were unable to approach it from any perspective but the protection of copyright. Unfamiliar with and even contemptuous of musicians and their culture, these corporations saw talent as a labor pool and listeners as consumers. Human resources. Rather than come up with innovative solutions to migration from records to CD's to the net, they saw each stage as an opportunity to divert more revenue streams away from artists and towards themselves. The ill-will only provoked more "file sharing," as musicians revealed to consumers that profits from CD sales weren't really passed down to them, anyway.

Today, faced with similar opportunities for innovation, media development, and content distribution, the AMPTP is choosing instead to find ways to cut its creative community out of the revenue stream. In their current media campaign against striking writers (and going so far as to cancel series, or lie to the press and public about which side is actually refusing to attend the negotiations), the AMPTP is already spending more than complete capitulation to the writers' original demands would have cost them over the next several decades.

Instead of finding ways to include writers in the profits that might be generated by the online distribution of content, they insist on calling such use "promotional," and keeping the revenue (mostly ad revenue) for themselves.

Should we be shocked or dismayed? Of course not. This is the way large corporations can be expected to behave. But what it does portend is the end of the mainstream corporate dominance of both television and movies. Yes: this is the moment we have been waiting for. Just as the music industry collapsed, so, too, is the film industry collapsing under its own weight and the chronic inability to see opportunities as anything but threats (or chances to bilk labor).

Get out your camcorders, kids. Fire up your Final Cut. And most of all, think of some good stories to tell. There a lot of people out there who will be awfully hungry for your content before too long. And - unlike the corporate producers - they might even pay you for it.

 

Article reposted from rushkoff.com

Creative Commons Image by seamusiv on Flickr.


email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Reality Sandwich.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You can only email up to 10 recipients
Hollywood: The Next Record Industry
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Reality Sandwich
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Reality Sandwich web site.

Implosion!

This definitely resonates with me. Regarding the music shift, I realized a couple of years ago that it was becoming more and more difficult to find rap that resonated with the changes we're experiencing and the revelations that have been unveiled in the past 4-5 years.

Myself not being a rapper,I took it into my own hands to seek out artists on the internet and make connections happen, making beats, organizing collaborations, etc...

 

It's amazing how capitalism really is starting to implode from it's own (almost comedic) overzealousness and lack of social foresight. From Wal-mart to Tower Records to Hollywood in large, the shift to independent art seems to be at once more localized by the abandonment of corporate super-structures and decentralized by the use of technology.

 

The cracks and fissures in the system seem to be blowing wide open, and in these times i think it's really important that artists are able to connect and really let go of their elitism and class tendencies to really make some amazing things happen!

 

I think it happened for me the same way the creative spark unites with the realization that one can add something totally unique to the spectrum of consciousness and art, and that they don't need a middle man anymore.

 

wanderlust

www.myspace.com/wanderlustdream

Picture of <em>Martin D. Anderson</em>

Re-Delegate

Douglas' words about a re-vitalized independent media beginning to encroach upon the ever-entrenching corporate media producers makes me think of the internal psychological processes that lead to our choices as consumers of entertainment and art. I notice within myself a voice that I characterize as the "delegation" voice, that which gives over to others my barometer of taste, which assigns value to number of production dollars spent, which looks to popularity as a validation of worthiness. I then contrast that with the voice that is attuned to my unique admixture of interests, that sees the limitations of low budgets as potential catalysts for innovation and creativity, that recognizes a lack of consensus as an indication of specificity.

When I do so, I feel I am re-delegating the experience of and responsibility for art and entertainment in my life to myself, rather than some distant, calculating entity whose ultimate interest is in my wallet, not my soul.

Picture of <em>m-sun</em>

mp3.com

In the late 1990's and early 00's indie artists like myself were making amazing royalties off mp3.com. The record industry decided to sue mp3.com into oblivion. They didn't like the idea that unsigned artists could make income outside their sphere of influence. 

Excellent post...