Digital Archeology and New Mythologies
Derek Beres
When I first heard Karsh Kale’s Realize in 2001, an aural gateway blew wide open in my ears. I had been familiar with prior East/West collaborations, most notably Canadian guitarist/producer Michael Brook’s epic work with qawwali great Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, as well as figures like Ravi Shankar recording with Yehudi Menuhin and Philip Glass, and Zakir Hussain’s finger tapping alongside John McLaughlin and Mickey Hart. Yet Kale’s album had an urban edge splintered with gorgeous strains of bansuri, sarangi and, obviously, tablas, the two-drum set that his name is synonymous with. The Asian Underground was burgeoning across the ocean, yet Realize was a horse of completely new colors. This record was the birth of what he himself dubbed Asian Massive, as well as the roots of my first book on international electronica and world mythology, Global Beat Fusion: The History of the Future of Music.
The book focused on the people behind the scenes like that Massive movement, as well as Bill Laswell’s inimitable Tabla Beat Science, Barcelona’s groundbreaking flamenco hip-hoppers Ojos de Brujo, the unstoppable Polish dub-folk of Warsaw Village Band, and many others. During the three-and-a-half year journey that culminated in the writing of this book – as well as the nearly two-and-a-half since its publication – one theme kept and keeps appearing through all my interviews and research: the computer is the first world folk instrument.
Folk instrumentation has defined and been defined by geography. The sintir is the patented bass lute of Moroccan Gnawa music; the legend of sitars and sarangis grew from the Indian tradition; the djembe would be the inner and deep voice of African rhythm; the incredible tonal range of the pipa would put Chinese standards on the map; when bass became king in the studio, Jamaican dub was born. Instruments grew and evolved and were shared so that, over time, zithers like the santoor were remixed into the cimbalom when Indian became Hungarian folk, and ouds were transported around the Middle East for centuries before appearing in underground Manhattan night clubs by a wild Italian prodigy playing effervescent strings over house rhythms as dancers danced and screamed.
Soon after Global Beat Fusion I put forth my first mixed-CD, Moving Stillness, on a label in Australia, a country I’ve never been to. It included artists performing South Asian, African and Persian instruments, mixed by them and me in ProTools, and released on two continents a half-world apart. Two years later I produced a remix album of Malian bluesman Vieux Farka Toure, featuring eleven different producers that sampled songs from a record made in Niafunke, recycled ingeniously with thick layers of trumpets, congas and bass. Now a man that stepped into his small African studio with an acoustic guitar, a calabash player and a dream has an accompanying remake that he blasts as he drives around desert terrain. The checks I receive for my various employments, much like the music I listen to, comes from somewhere and ends up in my account, and then leaves nearly as quickly, often to my chagrin. This instrument plays many songs.
I was speaking with a good friend yesterday about how unfortunate it is that many people, when speaking about global politics and societies, begin with a form of negative theology: we need to end this, we must fix that, this must happen in order to … until the next order needs to be retooled and reconsidered. This form of psychology borders on neurosis, because the overall theology isn’t liberating, but imprisoning. It is to constantly consider what should be, rather than what is, and creates the need of dominating peoples and ideas rather than experiencing them. There are many faces and facets of globalism, and the amount of creative sharing and exploring is astounding.
I am fascinated by the mythological and sonic connections of cultures, unconscious and attempted. Long before the music-as-commerce mindset came to dominate our perception of sound, the ceremonial rituals of voice and instruments were a sort of cosmic salve between humans and communities. The Indian raga is an expression of attuning oneself to the cyclical rhythms of nature, assigning various scales and notes to different times of day. Pakistani qawwali, Iranian ghazals, Indian bhajans and Moroccan gnawa are all devotional song forms performed as a conduit between individual and universal. Today these sounds are being dropped into laptops and recreated anew for the modern temple: dance clubs. Of all of these dizzying soundtracks constantly created and recreated, the most interesting bilateral exchange occurred in nineteenth-century Jamaica, where a sudden group of Hindus were to influence the very roots of one of today’s most popular music forms: reggae. This story is one amazing microcosm of how cultures converge and reform.
Rastas, the non-religious community springing from social turmoil in Jamaica in the 1930s and ‘40s, was rooted in Ethiopian folklore and their king Ras Tafari (Haile Selassie I). Many defining images we now associate with Rastas did not develop in Africa, but rather through Indians arriving in 1845 to work at Halsie Hall, a Clarendon sugar plantation. They mingled with local blacks and quick bonds were formed. The infamous Jamaican spliff derived from the Hindu ganja (more commonly ganga), their word for cannabis sativa, and the emphasis many Rastas place on marijuana’s role in religion stems from the Hindu bhang, a ganja elixir (and, obviously, smoking the good herb). The popular term “collie” derives from Kali, Hinduism’s dark goddess, referred to as “Kali weed.” Indian Ayurvedic medicine mingled with local botany, and early Rastafarian Leonard Howell (the first man to develop a sustainable Rasta community when founding the Pinnacle in 1940), also went by the name Gangunguru Maragh, a play on Sanskrit. While the Rasta name Jah derives from the Old Testament, there is little doubt the Hindu chant Jai – used in ritual songs to shout “Jai Krishna, Jai Kali” and such – influenced the Jamaican word for their homegrown version of Brahma.
Perhaps the two most interesting cultural parallels are dreadlocks and liberation. Africans in Jamaica saw themselves bound by slave lords. Turning to the biblical tale of Sampson, whose locks grew long and matted while imprisoned, their new coiffures began. Dreadlocks were not a part of the original Rasta code, as they already had enough problems with law enforcement; Rastas were defined by long beards more than matted hair. The practice came from sadhus, Hindu mendicants that had grown hair in tight locks for centuries, often associated with the god Shiva. The basis of Rasta philosophy, redemption, also derived from Hindu philosophy, something Howell studied when reading about Mahatma Ghandi. The forced Christianity Africans were taught never offered any sense of the transcendent, of liberating oneself during life and not after it. So while enslaved Africans found solace in reinterpreting scripture, it was not until learning about karma and the cycles life of that Rastas applied this to their own situation. Upanashadic scriptures mingled with Biblical mythology and within decades Robert Marley remixed the song.
Our situation today is equally fascinating. Issues like war, genocide and human rights need to be constantly addressed. Yet these must not exclusively dominate the media. Underlying global artistic movements is a silent revolution that used to require oceans and years to embrace. This is not to imply that the cold keys of computers can replace the intimacy and necessity of human contact. Yet, within the unfolding and remixing of a global culture, musicians and producers are redefining modern identity through sound. If we were to travel back centuries and question the yogi what this was, he would have replied: Nada Brahma, everything connected through music. Pythagoras, who studied with such sages before developing his highly evolved mathematics and sciences, would have agreed. Today physicists and biologists hear the chords and melodies of microscopes as the fugue continues. Just as DNA is the process that human bodies wear life after lifetime, our songs survive and outlast us as well. When we embrace the sometimes uncertain – yet never unexciting – flow of this process, the sages would have only one word to utter: Samadhi.
Image: "Cosmic Tabla Delay Meditation" courtesy of whiterainbow via Flickr.
- Derek Beres's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version




Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
spinning the continuum
Love your analogy about the computer being the first global folk instrument.
I've recently been listening to old school Indian Raga's on www.musicindiaonline.com, and finding the trance-inducing acoustics of the santoor, the tablas and the veena curiously contemporary alongside their electronic counterparts. (I'm sure you have much to say about this in your book.) From this induction I've been moved to research the views of some contemporary musicians of traditional Indian music, and not surprisingly, have found a chorus of complaints at the degeneration of traditional musics at the hand of our global folk instrument. Traditionalists can't be blamed for sticking to their traditions, but echoing your suggestion to accept the world as it is as a starting point for creative involvement, I wonder if we might similarly take the state of contemporary music, including the apparent decline of its traditional forms, as the basis for a fresh appreciation of the entire continuum of sound -- ancient to postmodern, and somehow to feel that in its rich and dizzying fullness.
Alongside the musicians you've already mentioned, Nitin Sawhney is another musician who seems to me to really hold that continuum in his own music and play it.
Shanti....
Fiz
re: spinning the continuum
Maybe its due to the nature of most of the artists I interviewed in my book (and interview in general), but I rarely run into those hardcore fundamentalist traditionalists. If anything, more open-minded people remind me how important they are, for they truly keep the tradition alive, which is a good point. Of course, anything espoused by a fundamentalist has the danger of dogma attached, so you have to take it carefully. It always remind me of teachers I encounter that talk of "true" yoga, one of the topics of my next book. In yoga, as in music, there are foundations that are important, but both disciplines deal with, essentially, Nada Brahma: the silence beyond the sound. Meaning it can't be discussed, and everyone will use their own means and find their own path in hearing it.
----
Derek Beres
http://www.globalbeatfusion.com
Healing through music
I'm all for the idea of creating global connections and social healing through music. Shamans have been doing that for thousands of years....
It's awesome that you made the "Moving Stillness" compilation... I dig it. I've played some of those songs in my downtempo and world-fusion DJ sets. My favorites are "El Karina" and "Axis Of Ignorance".
Have you checked out the Sublime Frequencies label?
http://www.sublimefrequencies.com/
Talvin Singh
re: Talvin Singh
If you're in NYC, Talvin will be here next weekend:
http://www.mutinysounds.com
----
Derek Beres
http://www.globalbeatfusion.com
it makes perfect sense
Re: it makes perfect sense
If you're interested in more info on that, the two books that I used as research are: The First Rasta: Leonard Howell and the Rise of Rastafarianism by Helene Lee (Lawrence Hill Books) and Home Away From Home: 150 Years of Indian Presence in Jamaica 1845-1995 by Laxmi and Ajai Mansingh (Ian Randle Publishers). The latter was super hard to get a hold of. It's out of print, which is unfortunate. I had to call the publisher in Jamaica and they sent one of the last copies they "had lying around."
----
Derek Beres
http://www.globalbeatfusion.com
Aesthetics for the planetary culture
For my own research purposes, I am interested in the power of fusing folk and electronic music together in a manner that creates an aesthetic for a planetary culture. If individuals in first and third world countries can identify equally with some such music, than a truly global identity that transcends national or ethnic boundaries is born- even more so than when the west exported rock and roll.
But I must admit that I am not so comfortable with the notion of the computer as simply a folk instrument. Isn't the computer a bit broad for the traditional definition of folk instrument?
I think the connection between planetary culture and electronics is accurate, it's just that I feel the multi-faceted possibilities of the 'computer' necessitate a new definition for both 'folk' and 'instrument.' Are we not dealing with an entirely new modality if the computer can generate beats, filter, synthesize, sample, amplify, splice, master, record etc.? And shouldn't we consider the distinction bewteen precise automation and organic performance?
Your book sounds very interesting, and I will look forward to checking out your book-
Re: Aesthetics for the planetary culture
Hey Mitch, great comments, and some things I have considered. You kind of the nail on the head with your question, and something I flesh out a bit more in my book: yes, we are redefining folk and instruments through the computer. So I think the power, as is often the case, resides more in your question, than in any answer I could give. Let me offer two examples.
A good friend of mine is a successful composer of film soundtracks. He was trained classicallly in piano for the first two decades of his life, and was considered a prodigy. It was too much pressure for him, so he left music for a while, but when he found his way back started working in film. I've been at his studio many, many times, and when he's working he creates this amazing, lush orchestral sections on computer programs. He knows the intricacies of the instruments, and how they should fit together from a classical perspective - not using a "cool sound" (which I'm not necessarily degrading), but actually composing on the computer. When you see the movies he scores, you would not suspects it was not an orchestra playing. On top of this, his greatest successes have come in films in India, where he meshes Eastern and Western classical traditions, often recording players from both and filling it in with what he needs on the screen. So where do the boundaries begin, and end? How do they?
Second: last night at the Koop show at the Hiro Ballroom I witnessed something I've seen often in the past few years. They are a jazz group from Sweden that records mostly digital beats and uses live instrumentalists. I much prefer their stage show than their albums. During one of their songs, they dropped a loop from the laptop in while the drummer and xylophone player played over it for a few minutes. Then the stand-up bass player and keyboardist returned, they dropped off the sampled beat, and everyone went into playing it live. Seeing both edges of the dynamic bring up the same question you're posing. In my eyes, the most important thing is this: whether it was the electronic-based or purely organic version, the crowd never stopped dancing.
----
Derek Beres
http://www.globalbeatfusion.com