Facebook's Anti-Privacy Policy

The Electronic Frontier Foundation gives an outline of the corrosion of users' privacy on Facebook. The social media platform recently changed its privacy policy again and notified users that it will be sharing their personal information with several corporations involved in a new marketing pilot program. These companies (including Microsoft Docs.com, Pandora and Yelp) will use the Facebook profile information that it gathers to tailor the experience of being on various websites and enable better targeted information to visitors. The change has raised criticism all across the internet and in the U.S. government where four senators urged Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to reconsider the new direction his company was taking.
Facebook originally earned its core base of users by offering them simple and powerful controls over their personal information. The EFF states, "As Facebook has grown it's helped itself — and its advertising and business partners — to more and more of its users' information, while limiting the users' options to control their own information."
As an alternative to Facebook may we recommend Evolver.net--where the intent is to build a new world into being, and not sell off the old one off in the form of bits and pieces of private information.
Tweet
- 4-30-10
- Jennifer Palmer's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version







Comments
Interesting perspective
Hi Everyone,
A mystic friend of mine with whom I shared this piece noted, "Facebook dissolves my social boundaries and helps me let go of my identity fears of sharing myself with the world."
Is there perhaps a spiritual benefit to Facebook's rampant opportunism? I'm still turning it over myself. Perhaps it's not their actions but the lack of transparency with which they carry them out that's the real problem.
I'd love to know what you think.
Peace,
jp
Has your friend ever left
Has your friend ever left their home? Have they been to a sports event, or a concert, or a park, or a church, or a bar, or anywhere else that people congregate?
Those are all opportunities to share yourself with the world.
Now imagine when you enter that bar, an attendant takes your photograph, and records your name. They proceed to follow you around the premises, writing down everything you say, and everyone you talk to. The resulting data will be sold to the highest bidder.
Would that bother you if it happened in real life? Welcome to Facebook.
http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/
Radical Oneness
Hi Kung Fu,
It would bother me in "real" life if someone followed me around as it bothers me online that Facebook is doing it. But what am I really bothered about? That my information is being shared? Why do I feel the need to be so protective about it?
My friend believes (as do I) that we are all integrally connected in a radical oneness. If that's the case, what place does privacy and copyrights have? Is this bothersome feeling I have a part of the old ego world, still crying out to be coddled and taken care of?
What am I afraid of?
Peace,
jp
It's not being shared
It's being sold, and any concurrent sharing is incidental. Whereas I see at the bottom of this page, that this very article is licensed for non-commercial reuse only.
I'm not sure how your willingness to hold FB to a different standard than Reality Sandwich, squares with the concept of radical oneness. I am sure however that "fear" is not the sole basis for objections to this encroachment.
(OTOH, one could imagine that those who acquiesce too quickly are simply afraid of conflict? ;) )