Support our Kickstarter

New Masculinity: The Only Good Man

NeilDiamond - Bang1.jpg

[New Masculinity] • I’m not sure if the new masculine lives in words. I can sometimes show it to you but I’m not sure if I can tell it to you. Nor am I sure that this new archetype of masculinity can reside in one man. In fact, I know it can’t. We men of the early 21st century are isolated, living within ourselves, divided between inner lives of outrageous fantasy and outer lives of mundane duty. We are passionate and reticent. Hungry for something better and, for most of us, without very good models of masculinity. Raised by frustrated women, confused men, and made-up images on a screen, the only help we have is each other, and we don’t play together.

We aren’t going to manifest a new masculine archetype by working at it or by training for it. Sure we can work and we can train, in fact, we won’t be able to help but do these things. We were taught by the world from an early age to relish the manly feeling of working and training and getting things done. Being ready to fight and, if need be, die. This is not new. Where we will begin to find the new masculine is the place where we play together. Not the place where we compete, which is just more training for killing each other, but the place where we play, and heal.

My girlfriend is a sexual revolutionary. She studies and teaches about sexuality and has done so in academia, in the professional therapeutic world, and within the sex industry. Her studies have brought many Tantric teachers into our lives. As the teachings of Tantra have made themselves available to me I have found that, as much as I enjoy the company of women, it is the men who I feel inspired to do the most healing with. The women have it dialed, for the most part. We men, on the other hand, well, let’s just say that most of us feel better and safer around women. Nothing wrong with that, it makes sense. We have been raised to kill each other, why would we want to play together? Yet, as I have been called to find safe, intimate and playful relationships with men, either in men’s groups or by pushing through the isolating patterns in my daily life, I have been rewarded with a level of relaxation I haven’t known since childhood, when play was all there was.

What is play? Well, in my case, it’s not a euphemism for sex. My own sexual tastes are frustratingly straight. Like most guys, I am steeped in homophobia, and like many of you I know that I must be gay-er than I would ever let myself be, even to myself. It’s funny, when I was a kid, and first getting messages about gay-ness from TV I was confused. The gay characters always seemed so effeminate, but if gay guys liked other guys wouldn’t they all be more masculine? They don’t like girls, so why would they want to be one? Later, when I became an actor I made the decision that if I ever played a gay character I would play him as macho as possible. I was never cast gay, and other actors have pioneered that choice since then so I must not have been alone in my confusion with the limp wristed gay male archetype. The point here is that, in order to play together, most of us are going to need to confront our own homophobia and silence the bullying, faggot-calling voice in our head. The one that keeps us from getting close to each other, and keeps us playing, primarily, with the girls. Does this make us gay?

Women in our society get to be strong and sensitive and smart and intuitive. Of course, it’s also fun and ego-fulfilling to have sex with them too but most of us have a history of women friends with whom we share the kind of witty banter and playful vulnerability that typified the buddy relationship in cop and cowboy movies of the 60’s and 70’s. Women are our friends, women are our lovers, and men are the enemy, that is, except for us. Isn’t it true? Aren’t you the only “good” man you know?

Do you have a male mentor? A man who taught you about life and guided you into the world? I don’t. My father died when I was in my early twenties and I’m not sure how much he would have been able to guide me had he lived. My good male teachers, the few that there were, have seemed to prefer to enter into mentoring relationships with young women. Thus simultaneously challenging sexist patterns and reinforcing them by surrounding themselves with young feminine energy. My female mentors too have logically chosen young women as their apprentices. And all of this is good. The workplace was and continues to be male-dominated and this needs challenging. The negative result of this is that there is now a generation of men who’s only mentor is mass culture which, I’m sorry to say, doesn’t have our best interest at heart.

So we are left with each other. It will require vulnerability and courage to challenge the crushing isolation but when we do manage to look around we will see that the world is not populated with oppressive killer drones who look like us but other man/boys who are asking the same questions that we are. Let’s play with the idea of what the new masculine archetype is, shall we? There is a better man inside of each of us looking for the opportunity to come out and play, fearless and free, like a boy. In playing together we will get all of the work done that we need to and receive all of the training we require, and we will be able to do it all without sacrificing our humanity. With smiles on our faces and tears in our eyes we will make something special where nothing was before and this thing that we create will teach us all we need to know about the new masculine. Then we will be the mentors for the next generation of men (and that is the best thing we can do for the women.

 

Play song in attachment below.

AttachmentSize
Shmushkin-Pussified.mp36.06 MB

Comments

Interesting post. I think a

Interesting post. I think a 'new masculine' will be central to what i would call a 'new human', or 'the greater self'. These reflections are frustratingly contentless and are often defined in negative terms i.e. by what they are not. It is going to take some effort to draw down this new archetype, whatever it is...all i know is that 'man' must die.

Good Husband

This is a great article. My husband and I have been talking about the need for a new masculinity for a couple of years now. The Women's Lib movement was all well and good, and as a modern woman I constantly reap the benefits. I feel that I can freely play. My husband is exactly one of these isolated "good men" who feels confident in his sexuality, yet in touch with his emotions. Because of this, as the article pointed out, he tends to have a lot of women friends. Interestingly, the male friends that he does have tend to be much younger, usually by ten years or so. I see this "metnoring" as a very positive way to influence the male archetype. At one point we considered starting a "men's movement" but we decided, much like the author, that a better approach is to "be the change you wish to see." I've always wanted my first (and probably only) child to be a girl...until I met my amazing husband. Now I pray that we have a son, and that he inherits my husbands enlightened attitude.

David Deida

might I suggest some David Deida (pal of Ken Wilber's) I found his angle startlingly lucid - especially when it comes to spirituality & masculinity hers a amazom link - for a good intro book of his stuff in regards to 'man' http://www.amazon.com/Way-Superior-Man-Spiritual-Challenges/dp/159179257... His book "Wild Nights" is my fav

David Deida

Absolutely!!! My girlfriend gave me "Way Of The Superior Man" and it made a huge difference in my life. Can't reccomend it enough to any man who is interested in exploring the New Masculine. I don't think this column would be happening if it weren't for Deida's work. Look for more about him in future articles.

Presently Yours,

Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball

Great subject

I would like to add that male musicians have a greater possibility of having this male connectedness because you're often literally playing together on a regular basis. I've been saying for a long time that being in a band is like having however many girlfriends there are members. And breakups can be just as ugly as well. But obviously every guy is not going to join a band, so what other kind of "play" did you have in mind?

What kind of play?

I think you are absolutely correct that bands have been one of the few relatively safe and culturally supported venues for men to play together. They may be the best forum for that kind of play but I'm sure that we can think of others.

I hope that this column on the new masculine will be a place for us to play with this emerging archetype.

I guess that by "play" I mean that this doesn't have to be a heavy thing or a demanding project. We can afford to toss this idea back and forth like a ball. If it drops, no biggie, just pick it up, throw it in the air and see who else catches it. I think that the more we can bring the spirit of play to our endeavors the more it will contradict some of the inflexible and constricting aspects of the old masculine paradigm.

Thanks for playing along.

Presently Yours,

Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball

Music men

I agree, music was my acceptable way to bond with other men as a younger man. So many of the other avenues for bonding (sports for example) were competitive, which tends to trigger those more negative male habits and socializations.

new masculinity

I agree with you that there needs to be a rethink of modern American masculinity, but there is one point about your article that I wonder about. The phrase "frustratingly straight," confuses me. If someone were to lament that they were "frustratingly gay," I would want to reassure that person that being gay is part of who they are, and tell them that the frustration might not be rooted in their sexuality, but perhaps in the way that straight society deals with gay people. But in the case of the phrase "frustratingly straight," I'm not sure what you mean. Personally I find nothing frustrating about being straight, because it's the way I am. To me it would be like being frustrated with my lymph nodes or my spleen; what's the point? I am frustrated, of course, by the way that males, both straight and gay, are expected to fulfill certain unrealistic societal roles. But a sexual orientation remains what it is. Do you mean to say that you would like to redefine what being "straight" means for you, and what being "straight" means in our society?

Why be frustrated?

Happy Dog,

I guess I don't view sexual orientation as being quite as easily defined as having a spleen, nor do I view the terms "straight", "queer" or "gay" as having entirely to do with who one chooses to have sexual intercourse with. I say "frustratingly straight" because I am frustrated with the way that homphobic conditioning makes it harder for me to be to close with other men, and I know that this is frustrating to many of the men and women in my life. I hope that clairifies things a little.

Thanks for playing along.

Presently Yours,

Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball

 

The New and Improved Man

An interesting and well written article. In defining the new masculine archetype it seems to me that we require role models to represent what is considered to be the ideal. Most recently the likes of George Clooney would fit that bill. However, many years ago (in the Annie Hall days) I remember that Woody Allen was widely regarded as the ultimate living example of what it meant to be a man i.e. sensitive. Clearly the definition of masculine changes with the wind, and what might be considered the new masculine archetype of today will soon become worn and stale in due time - and we will then be left yet again in search of a fresh new definition of what it means to be a man. Ultimately, for me, the best masculine archetype is to be true to who I am as a human and spiritual being.

Beginning to see

I found myself torn over this article.  I was lucky enough to grow up with parents who remained happily married.  I watched my father grow as a man; to throw off the societal triggers that hamper openness and learn to express love.  I hope I have been able to learn from his example.  I have also benefited from having a brother a year-and-a-half younger than me.  We've played together our whole lives.

But, the term "male" still has a negative connotation for me.  I've occassionally run into other men with which I can just be myself and I'm starting to notice certain common characteristics between them.  However, the men I work with and the men I pass on the street seem offended when I greet them with a smile and wish them a good morning.

I fear that a new archetype may be at least a generation away.  We've gotten to the point where we can admit the problem. We still have much further to go until we greet everyone with hugs rather than handshakes.

Yawn

I’m sure you mean well Andras, but do please go and read some of the literature from over a decade ago in response to the mythopoetic men’s movement before dredging up notions of the masculine archetype and the father wound. This stuff has already died one death.

And as for David Deida, you must be joking… You boys really are stumbling around in the dark.

I do hope Reality Sandwich isn’t going to simply dredge up old ideas and feed them to an audience that is either too young or too dumb to know any better. Skip’s comments following Pinchbeck’s review of the Tarnas book seem also to suggest this.

Literature search

You can get a good start on the literature you'll need to read here:

http://mensbiblio.xyonline.net/spirituality.html#Heading188

Now these are serious books, mind you, not the kind of stuff where pseudo-intellectuals wax lyrical about the nature of reality in the wee hours and claim it as a paradigm shift.

Almost perfect

Supersensible,

I welcome this kind of post. The tone is a little bit pissy and dismissive but, what the hell, it sounds like you've heard it all before so I'm glad you're sharing what you know. I hope you understand (and I'll probably have to say it many more times) I'm not claiming to be the authority on this topic. Simply a curious man, and my goal is to share my own experience and start a conversation. You can't deny that something is shifting for men during this time and I think it's good of Mr. Pinchbeck to create a space at Reality Sandwich for a conversation on this topic. Your contribution is a valuable one and I thank you for playing along.

Presently Yours,

Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball

Misery loves company... but aparently enlightenment does not

I thought that 'old ideas' that held true over time were called wisdom. Moreover ideas don't die just because you have gotten all you feel you need from them. Thankfully for us, "old Ideas" continue to teach even if people come across them years after you did.



As for the "too young and the two stupid" we have all been young and ignorant at one point or another. Clearly you think this is old news. You feel you have taken what enlightenment you can from these ideas and moved on. So why begrudge others getting there too?



I've always been dubious when the self proclaimed enlightened look down on anyone who are not yet AS enlightened as they are, as if they were born enlightened. If it took you years to amass all your personal wisdom, why would you begrudge anyone else to ask the same questions and cover the same ground you once did?



No I think that boredom is sometimes a smokescreen for intellectual snobbery. I think it was Thomas Szasz that said "Boredom is the feeling that everything is a waste of time; Serenity, that nothing is."

Nonsense

Those "old ideas" are called the perpetuation of patriachy, not wisdom; that you cannot see the difference is the problem. There is no enlightnment to be taken from these points: they are backward-looking. Who here, anyway, is the "self proclaimed enlightened"? Are you confusing this with someone who has actually done the required thinking? It's a rather mundane process really.

No Sense

By that rational the study of philosophy is pointless; as if studying the evolution of thought has no value. A man who looks only forward has no perspective. The past has things to teach. "old ideas" are re-thought and put with new ideas to create new perspectives. Looking only forward is like wearing blinders.

If you had more knowledge to add to the conversation... then you might have thought to share it for everyone’s benefit. That's what others did... suggested some reading to add to the authors ponderings. But you chose not to. Instead you told someone that their ideas were not worthwhile, and took the opportunity to boast how far ‘past all this nonsense’ you were. That's just intellectual posturing; hubris. It's not productive.


Surely there is a more sensible way to contribute to the process then negativity. If you are indeed standing on the shoulders of giants, they pray tell us who they are so that the author... and the rest of us can benefit as well. Judging and blocking are not avenues for progressive thought.

Look below

You say, "If you had more knowledge to add to the conversation... then you might have thought to share it for everyone’s benefit. That's what others did... suggested some reading to add to the authors ponderings..."

But I did provide further reading, in the link below, to serious, positive literature on the matter. You confuse being critical with negative: if you weren't so resistant to the “intellectual,” you might realise this.

 

step one: remove stick from ass.

Seriously, U R kind of being an ass dude. Talk 'bout BS macho crap. Being a KNOW IT ALL is totally class- A guy baggage. People who actually have it all together don't feel like they need to talk trash on other people. I love your screen name too btw. Then again I (heart) irony. When I first read "Supersensible" I knew you'd be anything but. Sure enough. Why not just call yourself "Please think I'm Smart"? Ego Death man. Ego death now.

Thought death man. Thought death now.

Whatever, dude. U can't go much further with the ego death wisdom.

Snore

> And as for David Deida, you must be joking…

yeah yeah -- like the brilliant bibliography you plugged:

http://www.mensbiblio.xyonline.net/additworks.html

 

Under "Important and recent works"...

 

I found the the article under discussion good in a general conversation starter kind of way--it does connect with something I have been thinking about lately.

 

I recently attended a funeral. Andy had lived with a huge amount of pain for a long time--I meet him 9 months after he had received a 6 month sentence from a doctor. He was doing a lot of different medical practices--his ancestory was native american and his dying experience was amazing for everyone who got to be a part of it.

 

In any event, at his funeral a lot of his "old" friends showed up--I knew the family fairly well, but I had not meet these guys. They had run a christian food line in down town LA since the late 1970's--they told a lot of story on Andy which was amazing--funny, tragic, full of warmth and compassion--really good stuff.

 

I had no idea that the energy and impact I got from Andy had been shared by so many other men. I do not think that this is unque with guys that can mentor effectively--they end up mentoring a LOT.

During the ceremony, the term that came up to describe him the most was the Christian Gift of Discernment.

 

This is where I have been working on myself. There is some good writing on discernment, but almost always from a western Christian tradition (which means that the reading is slow and dry, if nothing else!)

 

My current thought is that men with discernment are more enlightened mentors, that discernment is a gift that can be shared, cultivated and grown, and that it is likely the most important aspect of the New Masculinity.

 

Thanks, David S

The Test? Naked Wrestling

D.H. Lawrence stylee. Women in Love. Well done Alan Bates and Oliver Reed. Could YOU do it? Good old DH explored these issues in depth. 

 

Seriously, its instructive I think that for most men, physical contact with another man is problematic, unless in a violent or sport context, especially when we are stripped of our furs.

 

The Olympics of ancient Greece would probably be impossible today for that reason.

Sorry, but...

Well, after much anguish, in order to do that scene Reed slapped his penis around a bit to make it larger, but not erect, as he was petrified that Bates’ was bigger. Seems like typical masculine insecurity to me. The new “Otherwise Engaged: The Life Of Alan Bates” by Donald Spoto chronicles Bates’ closeted gay affairs. Hardly sounds like two men happy about their masculinity, does it?

You must look past the superficially plausible in order not to perpetuate old mistakes.

Supersensible DH Lawrence

Hi supersensible

 

To me Lawrence seems to be suggesting that for a man to achieve unified being, it is necessary for him to have passionate physical relationships not only with women, but also with other men. These relationsips need not be sexual. The old chivalric concept of blood brotherhood springs to mind, where one man would die for another on point of honour.

Drawing attention to the alcoholism and cloaked sexual adventures of the actors in the film is missing the point a bit I think.  Try reading  the book on which the film is loosely based, if you haven't already.

 

Lawrence is often attacked these days, but I'd defend him for his radical honesty which, gauche as it may occasionally seem, is liberating in a way that the ironic chic of our contemporary movers and shakers can never be.

Also why not try to see through the failings of poor old Reed and Bates to instead what they achieved in an iconic scene? I stand by my praise of them. Lets also remember that the scene in that film is based on a great novel.....

 

As for the post, yes, new masculinity indeed. New humility might be our next point of discussion.

 

 

 

 

thank andras

way to hang it out there... always open to playing so lets walk the walk... you did lose me too on DD way to dominate a woman and have her thank you afterwards...

life is a circle;;;freewil

Once upon a time...

Once upon a time, I had thoughts and impulses in some of the directions you mention in your essay... but I think I changed a good deal from late teens to early 20s, and had to contend with my own nature, very male, in some senses, and easy to manage.

I think that males (and females) have a need and profound desire to use their bodies forcefully, in acts of powerful action, and in violent, destructive, energized, directed movements. I felt this need sharply, subversively, painfully, throughout childhood and adolescence. I was not a brawler, I wrestled a bit, played soccer (aggressively at times), enjoyed a certain competitiveness - but was often afraid to unleash my full steam - my rage, which was palpable.

I was in my mid-20s, when I'd had enough - I was bursting my seams at times, hitting walls, getting into very destructive arguments - I decided, after alienating some people, that I had a right to my feelings - my anger, my impulses toward cathartic violence - But that I had a responsibility - not to make anyone a victim of it - Ever.

I went to martial arts, and committed a great deal of energy to it. I had tried it in small bits and pieces through the years - but never really found one that fit. I went to Krav Maga. Pure, directed, controlled chaos - unleased id, releasing that animal spirt, if you will... It was great, awesome, truly wonderful.

I could safely and effectively beat the tar out of a pad held by a partner, I could work with partners, with respectful ferocity, in defensive and offensive strikes, break-aways, pummels, push-downs, stand-ups, boxing, groundfighting, chokes, knee and elbow thrusts...

I loved it. I practiced the moves often, even always, at times. I started to loosen some deeply impacted parts of my psyche.

My mood lifted, my energy improved - or perhaps, clarified in direction. It was the begining of a wonderful process for me. I loved it so much, I've thought of teaching, but my life has asked me to do a number of other things.

Still, I would like to go back to it, one day, because I feel that it is a gift to allow someone to use their body in its full range of motion, without fear, without shame or guilt or prohibition, but mindfully still, and with alterness and consciousness.

I spend more of my active time in walking, stretching and light yoga at present, but I love the liberation of pushing the hands out, feeling the chi (qi) charge in my chest, and moving those blockages out of their corners, when they do arise.

We're all complex, I'm sure! And I'm sure we're all a combination of these many archetypical energies. So, that's what your essay brought to mind. Thanks for reading along!

Liam

BOYZ 2 MEN

In discussing what it means to be a "man" I think it is important to examine the current masculine spectrum.

 

In simplistic tems, it seems that on one end we have the archetype that SpikeTV is courting, the "Man's Man", the "Manly Man" and on the other end we have the effeminate, limp-wristed Wimp. Thoeretically, any given "man" can be positioned on this scale and be rated on his masculinity (or what is traditionally defined as masculine in our culture).

 

Yet in the "real world" (haha) this model quickly proves to be too simplistic. Men are not merly individual points or dots on the sliding scale of masculinity but appear more as quantum particles in the masculinity spectrum, able to occupy seemingly contradictory positions simultaneously... like a bi-curious student of Tantra that likes to beat the shit out of the bag at the gym or macho construction workers singing along with the Backstreet Boys.

 

My point is that the line between "manly" and "un-manly" seems to be already in the process of beeing blurred and any "New Masculinity" will have to be more than a new combination of traits on the existing spectrum.

 

I think that "playing" and the "inner-boy" are just the first steps in widening the spectrum and pushing the boundaries of what constitutes masculinity.

 

It's true, the "New Masculinity" has yet to be defined... while the "Old Masculinity" seems to be in contant flux as it forever re-defines itself.

The gender spectrum

Andras? Is that you? How suprised I was to find you here - writing the first article I read, on a topic central to my being.

I was very happy to read the first comment posted mentioning a spectrum. I have often brought up this idea and it seems to always be spoken to deaf ears.

When I consider both extreme, exagerated ends of the spectrum of the way men (and women) "should" look/think/behave, I am reminded that most of us are, indeed, somewhere in the middle. Just look around you for proof. How many "cartoons" of extremes do you see? Not many - despite what the media and our culture want us to believe.

We all want things easy; "either/or", "black or white", etc. so that we don't have to make up our minds, stumbling along the way, forming opinions, modifying them, accepting that there are some things we don't tknow right now (and may never know). I.E so that we don't have to "grow" bacause growing is painful - it's supposed to be.

We don't have good examples of guys who speak up on "gender politics" but simply those who act like 4th- graders, calling each other "fag" every chance we get for the smallest reasons, when an honest expression of how we feel, think or see simply needs no apology.

Is strength masculine? Is caring feminine?

And yet all we need to do is turn on the nightly news to see the inequities perpetuated in the look of the newscasters; guys with buttoned-down, buttoned-up attire - held-in with dull suits of brown, gray and dark blue. Hair well-trimmed; they want to be taken "seriously", as an "authority". Meanwhile their female counterparts often wear myriad colors and fashions, earings, necklaces, rings or bracelets. Hairstyles that often look like an intriguing "sculpture"; something to explore. And then there's skin; sometimes short sleeves or no sleeves, skirts, open-toed shoes, upper chest exposed... What a weird situation, the angles for  discussion on this one are plenty.

It's like coming from a foreign country, and wanting to fit in, yet still wanting to retain your own identity.

It's very much like this for men, too; told to be "strong" yet not wanting to be perceived as a predator or opressor.

I don't think this is a "rubik's cube" that anyone can ever solve, and yet I will continue to try. So I can stumble and learn and grow. Rather than giving up.

Man's Ego, defined loosely

Man's Ego, defined loosely as I remember it by Eckhart Tolle, author of "The Power of Now", are those thoughts which make us feel separate from each other (like feelings of superiority and self importance for example).

Beyond the confines of our ego lies our true nature, one of harmony and bliss. By tuning into your inner self with techniques like meditation and yoga we can learn that we have nothing to fear by not representing masculine archetypes mass media parades around on a pedestal.

To me, the greatest sign of masculinity is the ability to step outside of the confines of the social norm when one sees fit, to show our true selves.

We truly are compassionate beings and it's no wonder many men are confused because what the media tries to show us is not true to our human nature. It's usually a bunch of macho bullshit, that when applied to real world circumstances leaves men feeling empty inside because those archetypes have big egos, egos which cause feelings of separateness from your fellow man.

I say, we need to let go of all the bullshit and seek out our true selves.

The Feminine Man

It is important for men to look inside and believe that having a femine side is not un-masculine. A man with a feminine side is graceful, handsome, creative, loving, sexual, understanding, peaceful, any more adjectives? thousands.

But what women must not forget is that they too have to look inside and find their masculine side!

Absolutely

Yes, it is true. I am writing about my own personal stuff. That's the point here. I'm not a scholar or an anthropologist. I am a modern man, raised feminist, recognizing that something new is called for from men of this era. I will be writing about my own experience here even if I seem to be writing about someone else's. The only way to broaden the scope is for you to share your own experience.

I do not intend to pedastalize women but I think that it must be acknowledged that in the area of personal empowerment, solidarity, and gender politics in general, women as a group have been devoting more attention and work to unravelling sexism and its effects than men have. I notice that certain men outside of the cultural mainstream have taken a lesson from the women's empowerment movement and are moving in some interesting new directions. I am one of these men and I will be writing about my experiences, thoughts and inspirations here. Nothing more, nothing less.

Presently Yours,

Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball

you are a sexy beast, Andras!

*smooch*

anly

Women in summer would like to become beautiful. Everything can grab other's eyes is their best friends.Products make them beauty and confident is their favourite. Look in the street,you can see many different types of make up to show women's personality. Welcome to the shop, the following is our products, free shipping. Soccer Shoes Cheap Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes Adidas Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes sale Adidas Soccer Shoes sale MBT MBT shoes MBT Men shoes MBT Women shoes MBT Chapa Chapa GTX MBT Chapa GTX MBT Changa Women UGG Women UGG boots ugg boots cardy ugg women ugg cardy boots Nike Air Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Shoes Nike Dunk Nike Dunk SB Nike Dunk SB Shoes Nike Shox Nike Shox Shoes Timberland Timberland sale Timberland boots Timberland boots online Timberland on sale New timberland boots Women Bags Women Bags Sale Women Handbags Women Handbags Sale Women New Bags Cheap Bags Cheap Bags On Sale UGG UGG boots UGG boots short Short ugg Short ugg boots Ugg boots tall New women bags New women bags sale New women bags sale online Louis Vuitton Handbags Gucci bags hair straighteners hair straighteners sales GHD straighteners GHD straighteners sales CHI iron CHI iron sales BOSE headphones discount cheap CHI iron Nike Nike Shoes Nike Shoes Sale Nike running Nike running shoes Nike trainers Nike trainers shoes Timberland boots Timberland boots sale Timberland boot Timberland boot sale Timberland boots cheap Men timberlands Those who want to become most beautiful in the world should try them. Just ones can make you different. Girls who want to grab your boyfriends's heart is necessary to use them.

nice post

nice post

<a href="http://ocikho.blogspot.com/2010/07/travel-jakarta-bandung-day-trans-travel.html">travel jakarta bandung</a>
<a href="http://ocikho.blogspot.com/2010/07/blogger-templates-colorizetemplatescom.html">Blogger templates</a>
<a href="http://ocikho.blogspot.com/2010/07/blogger-indonesia-dukung-internet-aman.html">Blogger Indonesia dukung internet aman, sehat & manfaat</a>