Nature's Providence and the End of Smug

powellbig.jpg

 

The harmony of natural law . . . reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection. --Albert Einstein.

We have big heads. Large crania. These house big brains and also, it must be said, unlimited smug. Smug of such abundance that we tacitly promote ourselves as the greatest thing on two legs, the greatest species that ever ruminated on Earth. We love ourselves. We worship human intelligence and human creativity. Look at the towering edifices we construct, the extensive ideologies we build and champion, the vast political movements we support, the burgeoning corporations we bow to and serve, and the enormous armies we wield to protect ourselves. We are a truly massive species. We stomp around and push aside everything in our smug way. Our urge to conquer is devastating. We try to own all and everything -- islands, mountains, coastal waters, rivers, genes, crops, medicines. We even went all the way to the moon and stuck a flag in it in order to smugly suggest ownership. One day the entire Universe will be alerted to our smug presence. In fact, we have already started naming distant stars after ourselves.

Observe also the red carpets we roll out for our most cherished movie stars and the millions of dollars we lavish on them to promote inane products. Behold too the statues we fashion of our most esteemed cultural icons. To be sure, sometimes a large statue is simply not enough to embody such veneration. Thus we find entire mountains reshaped into the seemingly noble visages of American presidents. This is smug carved large and wide.

We even invented god in our smug image. We invariably call god "he." Some may say this is simply convenience. But it is more than that. Talk of god being "he" betrays the fact that we view god as having similar qualities to man. After all, man is so cool and so powerful and so wise (Homo sapiens means wise man) that any creative intelligence lying at the heart of reality must be man-like in some way.

And so it is that we adore and elevate ourselves. We are the ones. Indeed, it appears we have full dominion over the Earth and all that goes with it. The biosphere is under our smug control. Nature works at our smug behest. How, pray, did the biosphere work on its own without us for billions of years? Doesn’t matter! Because we are here now and we will manage the globe as we see fit. Nature will be co-opted to perform at our smug whim.

The land developer who gives the final nod of approval for a rainforest to be smashed asunder gloats with smug at the sheer power he wields. Even if he is informed that millions of exquisite speciated expressions of natural organismic intelligence will be destroyed in the developmental process, this only gives him pause for more smug. We can do whatever we like. We run the biospherical show. The smug is here. The smug has seized power and control.

A rich business man, after years of hard work, speeds off in his brand new sleek flash Porsche. His face is a picture of smug. He has earned the right to radiate smug. He put the hours in, he took the risks, he made his own lucky breaks -- his smug place at the wheel of a gleaming new Porsche has been hard won. Smug is ours to harbour and emit.

 

Smug implies a wrong relationship with Nature

Smug cannot exist in the context of the real world. Consider this: the Universe is made of energy. Everywhere this energy is flowing freely and providentially. Suns, for instance, radiate high grade energy in every direction for billions of years. That is what they do. Suns do not horde energy or hold back -- rather they serve the unconditional free flow of energy that defines the way Nature works. Such natural providence means that everything under the sun is freely given. Since the biosphere is plugged into the sun this means that the biosphere is being freely provided with 24/7 high grade life-supporting energy. The same applies to the evolution of life. The life potential that has unfolded over the last 3.5 billion years has been freely given. The potential for DNA to complexify, the fact that proteins can fold and self-organise themselves into exquisite arrangements of bio-logic, the fact that cells can thrive and self-repair, the fact that life can find a biological way to solve all manner of problems  -- all these amazing potentials are likewise given free by Nature.

In other words then, organic life on Earth is an unfolding potential that, like an axiom, is given. To reiterate: everything is given, everything stems from Nature’s providence. This is especially the case with us. We are given life and we are given consciousness. Thus, we literally find ourselves alive and mindful. We did not engineer the human organism. We did not design the human cortex. Nor did we make the various potentials of the human cortex. Nature provided everything. And here’s the rub -- for we do not accord intelligence or acumen or skill to Nature. Worse, we don’t even concede that we are surfing on a wave of natural providence.

Let me further clarify why our smugness is unfounded. Take a child genius pianist. Or an acclaimed painter. Regardless of whether they are smug or not, we may marvel at their talent. But where did such talent come from? Obviously the child musical prodigy has a cortex blessed with unusual musical processing power whilst the acclaimed painter is blessed with artistic talent. In other words, each has been provided, through genetic means, with an enhanced prowess of some kind. Talented people do not make their talents, rather they inherit them. And if they spend time honing their talents this is because they have inherited that ability too.

The same holds true of the business entrepreneur with his swanky new Porsche. If he made his fortune through business acumen this is only because he has been blessed with a brain/mind able to cogitate in a certain way. Maybe he has inherited a slightly more cunning mode of perception. The point is that men do not fashion their own organism and the various potentials associated with those organisms. Men find themselves with certain abilities and potentials. And even if we work hard to explore any given potential, this is only because we have also been given the ability to do this as well! What about a genius like Einstein? Ditto as before. Einstein was born with the potential for intellectual genius. Like the rest of us, as Einstein went through life he explored the potential of his own mind, worked out what he was good at, what he a had a talent for, and thereby explored that potential granted him by Nature. We cannot escape from Nature’s providence -- everything is given to us.

So if we grant that all the great things in life stem, ultimately, from Nature’s providence, then what the hell are we so smug about? We didn’t make the human race. We did not engineer the human brain/mind complex. We didn’t construct ecosystems or the essential services that they provide. We don’t make fresh air or fresh water or fresh sunlight. We didn’t make space and time. We receive everything -- life, conscious awareness, resources. Even the ability to give and receive love is granted to us. Everything is provided by Nature and we take it from there. And if we make something good of our lives then our ability to do so is likewise granted to us. If all this is humbly acknowledged it is hard to be smug about anything we do.

When we start pondering these truths we place ourselves in a right relationship with the rest of Nature. For we sense the larger whole that defines us and supports us. And once we sense the significance of the larger whole and see it as being the smart provider of all that we are, then we may start to behave in a more humble and more eco-friendly manner. Thus, until we acknowledge the all pervasive flow of natural providence in which we are embedded and admit that Nature is both smart and generous in terms of its creative prowess, then we will have a wrong relationship with the larger system that sustains our existence. The days of smug are numbered. The time has come to earnestly re-evaluate our place in the overall scheme of Nature. 

 

Simon G. Powell is the author of The Psilocybin Solution and Darwin's Unfinished Business

 

Image by Jared Smith, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

 

Comments

Hug the Smug

One small point of contention ... man, or any living being, is "primordially" a "spiritual being" ... as are all other entities.

The innate soul of each and every exists as "transcendental" to the inertial forces of manifest "nature" {matter / energy} we are not the mechanistic and deterministic outcome of our genes ... but are the conscious witness of their integral science as a relative part of our physical aspect.

However Mankind, with our exceptional "big brains"does have the unique ability to see beyond our immediate survival instincts. 

Every other species in the forest is competing for life. They kill each other in the name of claiming territory, on a moment-to-moment basis ... their whole being is motivated by this and this alone. 

Many of modern mans "ideas for domination" came from the Darwinian evolutionary study of survival for the fittest ... natural selection ... convincing ourselves due to this "theory" that we are "top dog" .. nothing more than top of the pecking order ... kill or be killed.

However the "brainy" Human is the only species that can study the whole forest Eco-system and "hopefully" learn how to "assist" and "compliment" the overall balance ... literally becoming a "steward" of all the other "smaller brained" species.

  Although there have been plenty of humans over centuries, millennium, that have understood this to different degrees ... well with all of our "Discovery Channel Witnessing" ... maybe, just maybe, it is starting to click that there is so much sheer wonder in nature that maybe it is time to back off our modern nescience in these ragards. 

As we now have all kinds of high tech photography "peeking" at literally every nook and cranny of nature, however practically inaccessible 

  The new Sunday Evening 11 part  "Life" series, on Discovery Channel, narrated by Oprah Winfrey, has all kinds of little ways they try to make "human" the activities witnessed {cute little jokes etc} showing the similarities between us and the rest of nature. 

All of our children are raised watching cartoons of talking animals ... how they are our friends ... until they progress to our killer video games where destruction is the sole motivation.

We are all of a a sudden encouraged in every form of competition as soon as this stage of initial innocence is over.

We get a little fantasy glimpse .. then right into dog-eat-dog competition among our very selves ... as we get older we take this "learned" behavior and go after the rest of nature.

It is all inertial "learned behavior" ... and not everyone falls for it. Our own peer pressure among ourselves feeds much of the fire. 

Only when we ourselves come to understand our own consciousness as "transcendental" {spiritual} to the inertial forces of matter and energy will we be able to "wise up" in our overall behavior.

Our Quantum Scientific views are beginning to show us that many of our mechanistic and deterministic view points are becoming obsolete.

  Humans may just wake up to the fact that being at the center of all existence, as a mere "witness of wonder" is much more sublime than merely being on top ... at the very expense of such

Arrogance

This very much reminds me of the written works attributed to Hermes Trismegistus where it is revealed that man's soul is imprisoned in the material world as a remedy to his arrogance. www.sniffcode.com

BraVo!

" A great friend may well be reckoned in the great masterpiece of Nature"--Ralph Waldo Emerson

 " A great man is always willing to be little"--Emerson

By far the most beautifully transcendental article I have read on RS so far!

All in nature and all other species are a sacred and beautiful 'gift' to humankind...and are not here for our personal consumption.

"Earth smiles in flowers" - Ralph Waldo Emerson

smugness or guilt

It is funny that we seem to take the credit for our own creation. I think that as well as this making us smug it can also create feelings of guilt that we're not doing better, seeing as we're so gifted and talented, feelings of guilt that in spite of all our potential we still individually and collectively screw up quite a lot of the time, that we can't actually control ourself or discipline ourself as well as we  think we should be able to. And this guilt gets projected onto others as blame. It does  seems that absolute surrender or openness to a higher or deeper source is necessary in order to find peace and self acceptance.

I recently came across this article linked on the daily grail website - New quantum theory suggests that the future influences the past -'the Discover article provocatively asks “Could the laws of physics be pulling us inexorably toward our prewritten fate?” .....Discover writer Zeeya Merali, are “looking into the notion that time might flow backward, allowing the future to influence the past. By extension, the universe might have a destiny that reaches back and conspires with the past to bring the present into view. On a cosmic scale, this idea could help explain how life arose in the universe against tremendous odds. On a personal scale, it may make us question whether fate is pulling us inexorably forward and whether we have free will.”

- I think this calls in to question even more the power of our own volition.

Neil Tyson - Human Intelligence?

I thought this video was very funny and might hopefully put human smugness down a notch or two -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-uZZ7RdL5E&feature=player_embedded

Tyson and smugness

That video - I believe I have seen a clip of him slagging off the Universe, claiming that the Universe was 'shoddy' in that stars were inefficient at burning hydrogen - or something along those lines. So yes the video you have linked to is good, but I think this Tyson fellow may have a smug view of reality - and think Nature devoid of any kind of smart characteristics.

a shoddy universe ...

I guess there's no pleasing some people...maybe he thinks he could have created it better.

I must say, in other videos I have found his attitude to be quite condescending or patronising especially torwards ufo sightings. I saw a similar attitude from Stephen Hawking - for instance in one video he says '.. we don't seem to be have been visited by aliens. I am discounting reports of ufos - why would they appear only to cranks and wierdos.' - ignoring that they have been reported by astronauts, presidents, generals, policemen, pilots etc. Dean Radin refers to this as a persistent ufo taboo in science.

http://www.noetic.org/publications/shift/issue_21/S21_Shift_RADIN_Enduri...

I thought it was interesting in that same article it mentions three basic ways of looking at the world. 'He called the current Western scientific worldview “materialistic monism,”or “M1.”Within M1, everything—both matter and energy—is made of a single substance. From matter emerges everything, including the brain generated illusion called mind. ...Harman’s second worldview, M2, represents dualism, which assumes two fundamentally different kinds of substances in the universe, matter and mind.....The third worldview, M3, is transcendental or mental monism, which Harman argued is the source of both the perennial wisdom and the emerging worldview of the twenty-first century. In M3, consciousness is primary,and matter and energy are emergent properties of consciousness M3 accommodates everything that M1 and M2 allow for, as well as rogue phenomena like telepathic ETs, observation-shy UFOs, and collective
mind–manifested UFOs. Evidence in favor of M3 has been slowly amassing for over a century'

It seems like some science or scientists are operating from M1 and others from M3 it's as if it's going to take all science a while to catch up to the same world view.

Disk Backup

Very nice blog.I gain some knowledge from you article.Thanks for sharing.Keep it up. Disk Backup

Yes, the majority of the

Yes, the majority of the rich "business men" and celebrities seem to become extremely smug the more famous they become. There are some who use there celebrity stature to help with important nature issues. People like Leonardo Dicaprio, Ellen Page, Edward Norton, etc. are few and far between and most people can quickly sort out the ones who are doing it for an ego stroke and those who truely care about what is going on with the environment around them. And it does actually get people more involved with environmental issues. I, personally joined this site awhile back after reading an interview with Ellen Page and I'm sure an article in a local paper on biking recently encouraged more people to join. I do what I can, even if it's a little, everyday to help nature, the earth, and my fellow man. From one Bluenoser to another, Thank you Ellen, for helping to open my eyes to my surroundings. :)

You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -Mahatma Gandhi.