Myth, Gods, and Video Games

Cultures are continuously evolving myths through their own imaginations, all while sharing a collective source of information. The strongest, most potent myths have risen from the land or atmosphere; gods and mythic tales correspond wholly with the dreamer's environment or evolutionary story. The current "massive mythic expression" is rooted in fear, governmental control, technology, the internet, and, for the sake of this article, video games.
Unfortunately, this foundation takes for granted that we know everything, in a century of understood, literal fact; a belief limiting to the exponential growth of human beings. Eventually, humanity will have to come full circle, embodying magic storytelling in hindsight of fully recognized reality and potential.
I have been curiously drawn to video games since a very young age, and remember being truly amazed at the possibility of so many different worlds at my fingertips. On average, this argument is easily swept under the carpet in favor of more "adult" mindsets, even though video games are calling for greater participation and intellectual comprehension, which our consciousness is responding to.
True myths vary from person to person, reflecting the atmosphere that surrounds "the definer," and experiences that have shaped and have yet to shape the individual. It is a reflection of who we are both on a cosmic and cellular scale, a secret to where we come from. In "A Short History of Myth," Karen Armstrong suggests myth is rooted in the experience of death, evolved through ritual, and that humans, gods, and nature are "composed of the same divine substance." Joseph Campbell stated that "each one of us is the mythological manifestation of God." Life is a direct metaphor of mythological energy.
Amazonian lore centers on the building blocks of life, as told through ayahuasca, "the spirit vine." Rainforests happen to include 50% of the planet's species. Gnostics sought a cosmic understanding, which they exercised through physical initiations of the divine, receiving one of the most beautiful stories of Earth to ever be expressed. Gods and goddesses of Greek mythology reflected a hierarchy of state, order, and varying levels of developing awareness, as seen with Eros & Psyche, Narcissus, Sisyphus, and countless more. The foundation of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic God is arguably rooted more in political and religious control than messages of freedom and love. Through an understanding of mythological process, "they" began to shift belief from infinite to finite, creating a no-way-out manifesto that stunted imaginative growth.
The challenge is to find reality within the dream. In embracing the unlimited and uncertainty, we free ourselves from the ego's zealous desire to attain "perfection," allowing the mythological, imperfect nature of humanity to express itself.
Linear, masculine understanding, where one idea exists, could be perception, while cyclical, feminine understanding, where all ideas co-exist, could be reality. One often confuses reality with what is perceived-to-be reality. Does reality exist without perception? Of course it does, but understanding exists through what is perceived.
All modern myths are in fact "real," but not in perceived reality which our consciousness defines. To grasp a myth outside of this "perceived understanding" -- that is where the strength, potency, and truth of it lies, that the imagined is the imaginary, not as something "unreal," but as a stand-alone truth, one that has yet to fully awaken in modern understanding. If ideas do co-exist, then one is no less potent than the other, as they come from the same source.
In "Teaching Spirits," Joseph Epes Brown describes how Native American stories "focus not on how tribes got to a certain place but on how the tribes became who they are ... as a part of mythic time, they continue to occur each time they are told."
And if the storyteller was asked, "Is your story true? Did it really happen?" they might respond, "yes," but there is an understanding of that happening outside intellectual thinking. Within this freedom, there is a letting go of the grasp of knowledge; storytellers connect with an epic "misunderstanding," a sacred truth more real than literal faith. In writing, any author will tell you their characters exist more than what is expressed on the page.
Belief in anything literal creates stressful limitations. More people are drawn to learning through modern myths -- big budget fantasies, Broadway musicals, and surreal video games -- than what others press as cold, hard fact. However, both perspectives are myths of their own, reflecting individual growth and a specific state of mind.
Virtual myths such as video games effect a certain external process of our imagination, allowing us to inactively live through fairy tales, dangers, and life-like adventures in ways that until recently were barely dreamed possible. As a child, gaming experiences rivaled my deepest dreams, or only heightened them in effect, because they required an active use of my imagination.
Twenty years ago, one would have to rely on their own potential to imagine dueling wizardry, magical expeditions, and heroic subplots -- no less through cumbersome Japanese translations -- to become physically transported to another world. If a modern gamer looked at the "Final Fantasy" of 1987, compared to the upcoming schizophrenic emulsion of "Final Fantasy XIII," "Final Fantasy Versus XIII," and "Final Fantasy Agito XIII," they'd barely stay attentive without a barrage of special effects, climactic cut scenes, and all around sensory candy.
These "empty sensations" allow for a huge counter-effect: completely separating us from our participating universe, as if disappearing from a huge galactic radar. Thousands playing online gaming communities like "World of Warcraft" are lost, their ears and eyes focused on something that, at best, is a pale imitation of their imaginative potential.
More game publishers are now banking on pulling people out of their "real world" instead of encouraging the "real magic," which perhaps exists within it, satisfying an intense longing for mythic expression. Through video games, the media is deadening our imaginations through a manipulative response to our desires, deadening our questioning, and our quest for the great human metaphor. Yet within modern myth lies the potential to finally diffuse the line between literal perception and mythic reality.
Already, the philosophy of our growing consciousness is being unveiled. In "Super Mario Galaxy," the well-known avatar hops from planet to planet, in continuous flight, illuminating a galactic curiosity. "Spore" puts players in control of defining an entire species, evolving first from a cellular to an infinitely cosmic level, allowing free-range between worlds and an extraordinarily changing environment.
There is an innate and real desire to see our dreams come to life before our eyes, and video games potentially lay the foundation for what we consciously have the ability to become: gods and myths of our own imagination, physically incorporating the balance between literal and mythical, among absolute endlessness.
In the popularity of virtual life, it is clear we already want to be in this place. Once a psychic connection is made between us and the imperfect potential of mythmaking, doors will open, with as many worlds to explore as there are dreams to discover them.
Tweet- 9-23-08
- Stephen Hershey's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Linking soul's desire to felt mythical archetype proxies
Great article! Finally a recognition to what video games can be, and what those who play them, and interact with them aspire to. Instead of an outright dismissal of gamers, which many outside their sphere are prone to do, this article puts forth that these games can be a connecting portal to creativity.
I strongly agree with the authors opinion and analysis of "old school games" versus the newer, more graphically comprehensive and flashy newer games. For what the old games lacked in their 8-bits of glory, more than made up for the interactive capacity of an imaginative player, who add their own layers to the experience.
In this regard, role playing games like D&D are exceptional in that a well crafted quest and the right circle of friends can engage in high adventure and heroics in a collectively shared dream-space, on the natch, as it were.
I agree with you
Wow .. This is a great explanation of the myth, God and games. I want to give my views on a little myth. As a human being dominated by myth, our attitude was determined by the myth that is within us. Myths make us love or hate what is contained in these myths. Humans always have preconceptions about everything to do with the myth. Myths also define fear or courage against something.
Seragam Kerja Kantor Murah di Surewi Bale Nagi
Collective Gaming Consciousness
Although a large number of games offer a mind-numbing, tedious re-hashing of 'old reality' memes, here and there a game injects itself into the mass gaming consciousness with a positive mythos. Although games of the past (which I grew up on and am very fond of) offer a more expansive void for the imagination to fill, some of today's games have become a symbolic cinematic experience. Some games with a powerful underlying positive message include Metal Gear Solid 4, Halo, Mass Effect, Half-Life, and Portal. Although most of these games use a 'violent' user experience to push its stories forward, we must remember that ancient religious mythologies of all kinds, Bhagavad Gita, The Bible, Greco-Roman myths, etc. present this same concept as an eternal battle. Even the latest Grand Theft Auto finally presents a hero who is more human, questioning his own actions and morals in a society that seems to have none. Funny enough, if you dive from a helicopter and walk inside the city's equivalent of the Statue of Liberty, you find a beating heart that is covered in chains.
We will see more of this as time goes on. It seems that many positive myths in certain movies, TV shows, comics, music, art and video games (basically, the sums of collective creativity) are slowly but surely conquering the outdated and ill-informed ideas of the power elite. In the wonderful comic series The Invisibles (groups of rebellious anti-authoritarian rag-tag cells of individuals fighting forces that intend on eternal control), one of the characters is obsessed with the messages in movies and media and determines that fellow Invisibles seem to be inserting messages for those who are seeking to find. "Big Brother is watching, so become invisible!"
Agreed, so Now What?
Agreed, on all counts.
So: What can we do to step up our game?
I can see a few avenues from here:
1A. To write critical analysis of stories and characters in video games, linking them to contemporary causes and thought. Put objections to the side.
1B. To promote (or demote) games with the backing of these critical reviews. To promote critical analysis of stories and characters, and to renew discussions about stories, movies, games, art, and life's meaning.
2. To write computer games, or scenarios for computer game media, with the intent of reawakening humanity. For example, a scenario for Battle for Wesnoth, or any other Free Software game.
3. ..?
These so far are all conventional suggestions. I suspect that there will be little, or only conventional criticism of them. They're kind of "no duh" suggestions.
Here is a radical thought.
Manifest the space of computer interaction (which includes computer games) for ritual or sacred purposes.
Recognize the plausibility that the "computer" will not be what we envision today as a "computer" -- a box with a keyboard, mouse, and monitor sitting next to it. Rather, that computers may well be everywhere, in everything, with primary input devices being speech, gesture, position, motion, and so on. Where the primary output devices are speakers, sounds, and displays on just about every surface.
So what are the possibilities for real magic?
If the imagination is the clearest channel for the truths of the heart, then what are the real-izable possibilities of living imagination that make use of computers?
If artifice such as statues and cups and paintings and scripts can connect us with the divine, then it is reasonable that computers can do the same.
At Damanhur, they use radio signalling to trigger some secret doors open and closed. This is a start.
Added thoughts
Although most of these games use a 'violent' user experience to push its stories forward...
One must also remember that they are simply reflections of what is going on. Its great that you mention Metal Gear, because the story's negatively evolved "war economy" is something that struck me as incredibly potent when comparing it to the state of affairs the world is currently engaged in.
Also, it struck me as I was playing another game, "Ratchet and Clank," that the entire objective is just blowing things up, collecting money, and buying more weapons. While its great fun to play, it reflects such a "consumer high" within the consciousness. There is hardly any modern game that doesn't require you to "buy," with an "ultimate item" being really really really expensive.
If artifice such as statues and cups and paintings and scripts can connect us with the divine, then it is reasonable that computers can do the same.
LionKimbro, your ideas well-put. I had a long conversation with a friend about the potential of art within video games. Of course, senses of art can be found anywhere, and there will always be moments during interactions with the technological that inspire some form of expression within the body, but I feel that expression is still removed from the Universe.
When painters and sculptors work, they put an energy inside their efforts that can be physically felt thousands of years later. As Rimbaud might put words together to form a poem, he places an image inside those words, that is transferred from medium to medium, remaining constant, so that when I read the poem, I feel the original intention. What is the energy? Maybe it's love; it is definitely something that is collective to all expression.
However, technology reacts differently to expression. I see technology as "switching gears" somewhere along that transference of information, maybe moving from something psychic-based to electronic-based, where we are not yet so evolved to put the two together. Essentially, this fusion of energy is similar to what I think of extraterrestrial technology, something that combines mass-techno-engineering with the psyche.
I feel that video games, in their current state, are just entertainment, in the same way that rock and roll, movies, fashion, etc. are all entertainment. But, they do provoke, and inspire.
its odd...
Explorations of points of view
In addition to the words of the author, it can also be said that all of our experiences of anything come trough a specific point of view which makes me not you on this plane of existence. In this sense we are all in a highly complex system in which we interact, create, destroy, grow, fall, die, etc.
So since we already are playing a video game, the computer generated virtual worlds are highly simplified reflection of our "real-time" reality. It is a tool for our consciousness, a dream-reality-simulator, and as such is neither good or bad. Inherently, it has no morality or purpose, but takes one from the creator/user.
Imagine now a video-game system with a fractal nature based on co-creation of visual/musical Art with users around the Orb. It would have no one specific goal except for the act of creation itself. This is just an initial concept of possibilities. You're welcome to expand on it if you will.
Thanks for a good read.
Ivan
Old games, new games, lucid dreams
active intentions
Thank you for your criticism, Fabrice
When talking to my acting professor about this, he took a similar approach to yours. He said that in no way will a machine ever replace the use of the human imagination, no matter how advanced; that these interactions require our imagination to make them possible and real. And I agree, though I still feel there is less active imagination in effect with the current generation of technology, and more dependency on these "empty sensations."
Modern video games must then seek to rediscover what that energy was that made 2-bit pixels seem so extraordinarily mythic as their technology and intentions evolve. I have yet to play it, but the popular "Shadow of the Colossus" comes to mind.
Also, attention spans are low at every interactive medium. It might be like watching a Bergman film versus an X-Men film. To be inter"active" within such a medium requires an active engagement, while most participants, based on what they have gotten used to, mostly want to sit back and enjoy the ride. Myself included.
Perhaps the challenge lies less in the technology of the game, and more in the "imagineer," or the participant in the process?
massively multiplayer online worlds, ithe people make the game
online expression
As I mentioned in the article, I feel that video games, or anything that emits electrical sensors, somehow disconnect the player from their own mythic, reality dream. To me, MMO's reach the pinnacle of that seperation, not just seeking to simulate another world, but to simulate "the world." Engagement in such a massive, electronic expidition requires one's own dreams to be forfeit. And is that worth it? Compare the synchronistic expression of two active human beings to feeling slight tinges of growth within in-game relationships. Expression has become rampantly casual in the 21st century. Somewhere along the evolutionary path the necessity of heroism and expression has been droppe.
It is this evolution that, as you said, we "settle" with., and we now risk settling with a flacid expression through technology. Facebook, MySpace, texting, etc. is all becoming more than accepted means of communication. While it may be more convenient and safe to sit at our computers while juggling relationships, does it compare to actual human contact?
For example, the YouTube video was cute, but the caption for that video even read, "what you get with boredom and lots of gold." What heppened to singing out because your heart was happy, or sad? Has love reached an ultimatum that can only be acquired once one has already killed everything and attained lots of money?
Yes, I was hysterical when Aeris died, but the amount of expression I may feel when playing a video game has never come close to such liberating torment felt during real relationships. Video games, as of yet, has not made me lose my appetite for a week, but the loss and realization of love has.
It is this relationship with love, the bloodstream of expression, that I feel is missing from the technology medium, for no other reason than the nature of the beast. How can it? As far as I know, they are simply electrical blips and bloops, bleeping and blooping until we tell them to stop. Perhaps evolution will allow us to integrate technology with the psyche more immenently, but I feel that is far from the case where we currently stand.
And I would say the challenge of players is to be aware of their inherent imagination, or love, while engaged in such entertainment, so they may continue to be inspired, have fun, and remain on the galactic radar. Think about how much change that could come into effect within "reality's dream" if everyone took a break living their lives online.
I acknowledge your opinions, and I am definitely in no place to judge the degree of one's feelings, but I recognize a critical absence of expression when living one through such "second lives."
I totally agree that MMO's
But what happens after I've Mined All The Crystals?
From my perspective it seems that games are excellent ways of re-inforcing / re-enacting cultural norms and have been a critical part of our evolution.
After many a late night of Starcraft, Civilization or WoW I've wondered what current cultural story or meme was I participating in with this game. It made me wonder what happened after I achieved "Victory". A victory that comes with mining all the resources and killing all my competitors. The game told me it was over. Was it really?
Playing WoW the experience I came away with was at its base elements clicking on a screen for long periods of time that provided increased levels of reward or punishment. To what end? It made me feel like a Cat chasing a Laser Pointer. It really seemed like Pong with better graphics.
Granted, these have been my experiences. Yours may be different. But it does make me wonder. Especially when agencies like the Military are very into funding Video Games (FPS & RTS). Are they counting on pre-programming / imprinting minds at certain vulnerable stages of their development?
So.
What Current Cultural Memes / Norms are these games enacting / enforcing with our Consciousness?
Are Video Games mediating or replacing Real Human Interactions?
What kind of Social Constructs are video games creating (programming?)?
Good article Stephen. Nice to see someone exploring the modern day manifestation of myths, games and their importance in our culture's evolution.
America's Army
Reference to my above post.
In WWII a War Department study found that only 25% of soldiers were firing their weapons in combat. Training was modified (simulated targets falling down...) and by the Korean War the percentage went to 55%, Vietnam 90%.
(Dave Grossman, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society)
It's interesting to see how a game like "America's Army" could begin a person's "traning program"at a young age.
xD
Well . . .
There is no doubt that the boys and girls and men and women who have enlightened us from within the spheres of D&D and Myst and those geniuses who swam amongst BBSes and who created "Pickle-Wars" and who have explored the abstract world of pure thought and mind minced and translated into virtual reality . . . that these are pioneers.
Cutting edge play that unfortunately is often way beyond most of us.
A new vocabulary exists, and the fantasy reality is most likely only really appreciated by physicists who mis-interpret Heisenberg or think Schrodinger was a physicist rather than a metaphysicist.
I have a friend, a mathematician and theoretical physicist, who's ideal is to ultimately be reborn as Dotty Dog in an abstract realm where the "Get-Along-Gang" isn't just a toon, but predominant reality. All the problems of life are relatively innocuous, innocent and . . . I can't see any reason why not. If he can get there. Let it be.
In fact, from my current thought I can see how the ugliness of our 'reality' may actually only be, in part, due to our willingness to 'buy it'. We accede to it. We appropriate it, give it energy and hence mass and we call that 'objectivity'.
Right.
If the cat is both alive and dead in the sealed box, and only becomes one or the other upon 'observation', then a simple test is in order: come to a conclusion before observation and maintain that the cat is immortal and indestructible and it will always come out alive from the randomly toxic innerds of this 'box'.
Or the opposite . . . I guess, depending on what the character of ones' will is.
Statistics will probably come into play at all levels of idealism where people want a 'utopian' outcome.
And then the obvious rejoinder will by strategy be defined by tactical analysis (or vice versa?): we must prosyletize our 'utopia'. We must use propoganda for the 'good'.
I think it much more profitable to convince people that reality tends to follow belief systems, and allow them to examine their beliefs . . . critically. NOT that my own or someone elses particular idealism is THE utopia.
In our shared world, we have to come to some compromise whereby we can allow that the only way everyone will reach 'utopia' is by some kind of 'ascension' and not by 'bringing down' particular idealism as a kind of prison-on-earth.
I see this as the big problem with politic and financial trendiness. Rather than estimate accurately and accomodate fairly all levels of idealism, we want pure, black and white and fully defined, easily recognised boundaries: Rich, poor. Period. And what is 'rich'? What is 'poor'?
Who defines? What does 'middle class' mean? Do we really think that a family living in harmony in the wildernesses must have a 'two-car' garage? Is this what we intended in empowering the International Monetary Fund?
The greatest Soviet ever was Ronald Reagan. We are seeing today just to what extent his hawkish insanity has permeated all levels of what, otherwise, might have been a world-wide culture of gamers who really didn't want any harm to come to anybody. The beautiful gamesmanship that was evolving got kicked in the nuts by this mad-man. Yet, I'm thankful, we have these gamesters who know how to judge a puny 'feint'. And they simply shrug. Let's see if they know how to vote. That's the big question today. Otherwise, it may be a matter of time when all their computers are as unplugged here as they are in China. <
two words....
LEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRROOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENKIIIIIINS!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeroy_Jenkins
Thank you.
Thanx kat for some GOOD news
good
David vs Goliath