Mushroom Gnosis: Simon Powell's Psilocybin Solution

3567431472_457934252a.jpg

In my zone of research, psychedelics and language, Simon Powell is a card-carrying member of the Guild of Xenolinguists. Xenolinguistics is the study of alien languages. I use the term to designate a class of psychedelic experience which involves visions of novel symbolic systems, novel ideas about language, and communication with the high strangeness of the Other.  Powell’s work, "The Psilocybin Solution, The Role of Sacred Mushrooms in the Quest for Meaning," (Park Street Press, 2011) concerns the ability of the psilocybin experience to deliver high-speed downloads; information transmission as communication with the Other; and especially, information delivered as a visual language of intense concentration. The Psilocybin Solution, stands in counterpoint to the 20th century’s “final” solutions, the counterbalancing light to that deepest darkness of the human spirit, the title capturing the seriousness of Powell’s message.

You can’t put this book safely in a genre:  there’s a brief social history of psilocybin:  Maria Sabina, Wasson, Leary, Koestler, Huxley. There’s neuroscience, a ride through the neuronal network, the vast electrochemical signaling system that produces the spectrum of conscious experience across multiple states. Powell covers in general terms the actions of psychedelics as neurotransmitters, binding to the same receptors as serotonin and other neurotransmitters with major changes in one’s state of consciousness as a result.

But to me, this reads as a wonder tale, a once-upon-a-time narrative, deeply personal, effervescent tale of the adventures of an enthusiast in a psilocybinetic state of mind. The narrative voice avoids the inflation one sometimes hears in ‘the tale that must be told;’ the story is delivered with a pocketful of wry at every turn.  The book takes off with the introduction of his concept of information:

“Whether it be a vivid dream or an entheogenic vision, the normal perception of an object or a psychedelic perception, the underlying structure of such experiences can now be discerned. The common mediating factor is information, and the way that information is transmitted, organized, and substantiated by the neuronal firing activity of the brain. Information, the “currency” of the brain, emerges as the key concept in explaining the normal conscious mind, the entheogenic mind, and the dreaming mind.”


The discourse on intelligent design goes back at least as far as St. Thomas Aquinas. Intelligent design became identified with the fundamentalist assertion of creationism, a doctrine that opposes Darwinian evolution, and virtually every scientific argument for natural evolutionary processes.  Psychedelic studies has its own take on intelligent design, approached from the knowledge gained in altered states of consciousness, in which Nature itself, and all its densely intertwingled components, are perceived as radiantly intelligent.  Intelligence is redefined as a quality, not only of humans but of all life forms. Jeremy Narby’s book, Intelligence in Nature, speaks to this point.  Ayahuasca research, and the broader exploration of South American plant medicines, all speak of direct communication with the spirits of plants, of plants as intelligent teachers. This brand of natural intelligence is a central concept for Powell as well. And Nature, for Powell, goes beyond our biosphere and ultimately includes both animate and inanimate Nature: ‘life, the universe, and everything.’

“…mind stuff resolves itself as being informational stuff. This is perhaps not too controversial a claim, but what I eventually hope to show is that matter, or physical stuff, is also informational in nature. This would mean that everything, whether atoms, molecules, organisms, or thoughts, could be described in informational terms.”

Powell introduces his discussion of the Other—the experience of the felt presence of an Other in psychedelic, especially psilocybin states—in terms of information and its transformations. Terence McKenna comes back time and again to the consideration of these Otherly experiences, especially with the mushroom, and entertained many hypotheses about its nature, from being the voice of the mushroom itself, speaking as an alien import, to the voice of the Logos itself, imparting knowledge through the agency of the be-mushroomed state. Surely the question of the nature of the Other, (who are those guys anyway?) and the source of the knowledge they deliver (is this from a previously hidden part of “my own” psyche, or from a source outside of “my self”?) is one of the enduring mysteries of the psychedelic experience. Reports of the alien Other confounded Rick Strassman in his DMT research. Cultural frameworks such as shamanism on the one hand and science on the other deliver widely different interpretations. In psychedelic studies, epistemology—what do we know, and how do we know what we know—is an extreme sport. Powell concludes,

“The Other thus represents a name, or label, for the kind of information processing underlying the visionary state. An apparent communion with the Other demonstrates the inherent property of neuronal information to purposefully organize itself into streams of ideas laden with profound meaning. If one can conceive of the mind as being a kind of informational process, one can equally envisage the Other as being an informational process. Whatever the actual neuronal firing mechanisms involved, it seems likely that the self-organization, or forced coherence of immense amounts of information underlies the felt presence of the Other.”

Psychedelic experience makes more information available to the conscious mind.  Anthropologist Michael Winkelman describes this in terms of psychointegration—the cortex receiving information from parts of the brain normally filtered from conscious awareness. Powell describes a state of informational flooding with psilocybin, resulting in the coalescence of new information patterns in the form of the constellation of the Other, and of “highly similar mythical images and symbols full of meaning and associative power.”

These highly condensed units of information organize themselves in linguistic structures. Powell’s description of language:

“…language is essentially an informational system not restricted to words alone. Language, in the abstract way in which I refer to it, is a system of informational elements bearing definite relations with one another; hence a language of words, of molecules, of symbols, and so forth.”

And the connection of information, organized into new forms of language, with the Other, is tightly drawn, and its qualities outlined:

“To partake of a visionary dialogue is to be overwhelmed by the direct apprehension of pure, unadulterated meaning, which arises as a consequence of the highly integrative informational processes liberated by entheogenic compounds. . .Here we begin to understand what the shamanic visionary experience is like, that it consists essentially of a communication transmitted in the higher language expressed by the Other, a language of symbols embodied in animated imagery.”

Language, for Powell, goes all the way “down,” into the fundamental organization of matter, and all the way “up” as the highly condensed visionary symbols of a “higher” language of the human psyche—numinous, condensed expressions of meaning. Powell describes a living language: animated, personal, responsive.

“Universally powerful visionary symbols can be thought of as expressions in the dictionary of a “higher” language connected with the human psyche. What I mean by “higher” is that the visual elements in this language are far more rich in meaning and informational content than the words of our spoken language. . .”

Powell sees the content of the visionary sequences originating in the personal memories of the individual experiencer. I agree with his description of the patchworking phenomena by which pieces of experience are recombined into powerful new communications. However, many reports by psilocybin and DMT users especially describe additional content so profoundly novel (alien is the word often used) that they can in no way be subjectively connected to personal memories.

My own analysis of the reports of xenolinguists such as Allyson Grey, Jason Tucker, and Terence McKenna, validates Powell’s observations of the construction of visionary dialogues with the Other. The literature of shamanism also reveals, in different cultural contexts, the dialogue with the Other as the source of knowledge: diagnosis, healing, divination, and the production of symbolic art forms (as in Tukano and Shipibo artifacts).

As Powell summarizes: 

“…whether personal or universal, information becomes incorporated into entheogenic visions in a novel and creative way such that a definite message or meaning is conveyed, or at least appears to be conveyed. The resulting overwhelming confrontation with a spiritual intelligence is the result of information integration to the point where the integrative process appears to be alive, purposeful, and distinct from the self or ego. This is the transcendental Other, a sentient informative entity that is not us but something very closely related to us.”

A theoretical view—that the Universe is computational, its “stuff” is language-like—is transforming in our times into a practical reality.  The stuff of the Universe becomes, in Mark Pesce’s phrase, “linguistically pliable.” The genetic code can be molded into new life forms. Nanotechnology gives us writeable molecular configurations. And at the macro level, additive manufacturing (3D printing) is progressing beyond the manufacture of shaped geometries to the shaping of multiple materials within materials that embody behaviors—sensing, reacting, computing (New Scientist, July 30—August 5th, 2011).

The book concludes with Powell’s “fantastic hypothesis,” which brings together his arguments about the mushroom’s visions, information, natural intelligence, language, and a computational universe in one package. It’s a whopper, and I won’t spoil the experience of discovering it yourself.  Just a hint:

“…the reality process around us can similarly be viewed as a fourteen-billion-year-long translation of the Other from one language-like form into another…”

Psychedelic self-exploration, call it psychonautics, is research in the most basic form:  ingest a substance, observe the experience, report, and interpret, as best you can. Repeat the experiment. Compare results with other experimenters. Most of this research is informal, our reporting is verbally to each other, sharing experiences, best and worst practices, tips and tricks, trying to figure it out, attempting, little by little, to integrate the floods of information into our lives at baseline, in the quest for meaning.

Simon Powell’s wonder tale ends with the requisite happy ending, and a call to action:

“This is like the plot of some elaborate adult fairy tale. If we genuinely wish to gain self-knowledge and realize our place within Nature’s endlessly creative transmutations, we can deliberately seek out and consume the “truth.” Like cosmic actors, by performing an age-old ritual act in time and space, we can perceive the world afresh and anew. Through psilocybinetic gnosis we may even glimpse the full majesty of this astounding Universe in which we are so privileged to find ourselves.”

Read this book.  Follow directions in the last chapter closely. Confirm or deny.

 

Image by afgooey74 on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing

Comments

We're all in this together...

Thanks Diana - much appreciated : )

mushrooms, madness and beyond

The use of psychedelics in addition to some form of teaching on the nature of the mind like what is find in a lot of the higher Buddhist texts is a fabulous combination. The one takes you to the vision while the other allows you to process what you have seen and take it back with you to form part of your daily understanding of what is actually happening in your mind. Psychedelics without Buddhism can be rather chaotic, and Buddhism without psychedelics can be rather slow and dry. To use everything and anything as the means to liberate oneself from suffering and to suck the juice from reality directly without the need for some priest/shaman class of translators is surely the ideal. They say that mushrooms show you the right way to live, but for me mescaline as a more active substance allows you to live without thought and worry, also the right way to live. It is in effect the active principle of being. On the other hand to favour any entheogen over another except as personal predilection seems a bit strange as if one is pure then surely they all are pure. Check out www.buddhabrats.com the three free chapters especially the left hand path for a different take on both teachings and substances.

Adamas

Thanks for this. Superb

Thanks for this. Superb text and quotes, one of the most coherent explanations I have yet read in defining and describing the bemushroomed state. It feels like reading stuff like this really boost the "inherent property of neuronal information to purposefully organize itself into streams of ideas laden with profound meaning" in understanding my own experiences of psilocybin. It will be interesting reading the whole book.

sorry...i Hate computationalism!

Admittedly, I am not brainy enough to argue about this technically--I have tried to with a major exponent of this theory,  MAX FREAKOUT, devotee of Michael--egodeath--Hoffman, at Psychonaut.com---but I just can explain in my way that I am suspicious of it, because it seems typical that 'man' with try and fit the universe and ecstatic experience (I hope I dont offend you personally saying this mate) into their latest technological understanding just like 'thinkers' of the past did, using mechanistic metaphors to try and explain phenomena of the mind---eg., Descartes, Freud, etc. *************Terrence McKenna was a psychedelic transhumanist and would come with theories such as it would be possible to 'download consciousness onto a computer and be immortal'--that is SO Transhumanist, and for me very dangerous, because it makes 'cool-sounding' what the elite would very much like us to willingly do. Ie., queue up to plug our nervous system into their computer and then they can control us BIG time. In fact they are doing it now with 'mass media' but that most certainly would be a 'upgrade' --you can just see the jingle "BE COOL. BE PLUGGED IN" or some shit like that!************But on a deeper level dig this: science does not 'KNOW' what consciousness IS, nor what matter is!!! It is Mystery, and so are the magic mushrooms and the spirits, nature, and us.

Primordial Communion

Fascinating post.

A enigmatic, little known piece in the history of entheogenic mushrooms: how the Sufi Idries Shah - at the time, secretary of Gerald Gardner at the Museum of Witchcraft in the Isle of Man - revealed some clues to Robert Graves about the Ecstatic Mushroom Cults of Europe, inspiring Graves to - in turn - encouraging Gordon Wasson to keep looking for remnants of these cults, finally the latter finding Maria Sabina.... All of them, places and wisdom lineages that still revere the World Soul, the Indwelling Mother Intelligence of the Land...

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Idries Shah & Robert Graves

Zorro - a belated response as I only just read this review and your comment. Very interesting work. You mention Idries Shah's influence - something I was not aware of. However, upon further investigation I see that the chronology doesn't work, as according to Michel Pharand http://www.robertgraves.org/issues/20/6961_article_205.pdf Shah's initial contact with Graves was 1961, years after Wasson and Graves were already advanced in their experimental Mexican mushroom researches. Graves and Wasson's friendship tracks back to the early 'fifties. For the really compelling origins of this line of inquiry, we need to consider the research environment Richard Evans Schultes' was operating in during the 'thirties. Wasson's Life Magazine article came out in 1955 I believe, so these ideas were widely accessible before Shah contributed to them. He would more than likely have been deeply influenced by the reports about LSD emerging during the late 'fifties, from Huxley, Sidney Cohen, Betty Eisner, Humphrey Osmond, Oscar Janiger & others; while Stan Grof was already exploring it's multiple possibilities in Czechoslovakia. Of course Aleister Crowley was investigating mescaline long before that, but regrettably his record of those early experiments in "The Cactus" has never been recovered & may be irrevocably lost. The history of entheogens is an extraordinary journey, and an invaluable guide to the cognitive understanding of our experiential reach.

Shah (man)

In The Archaic Revival, McKenna suggests that Shah gave knowledge of entheogenic fungi to Wasson - but the dates in the books he quotes do not quite add up. In any case, McKenna was musing that there was a Sufi line of knowledge concerning psilocybin mushrooms.

Those who know

It looks like my memory distilled the poetic truth by resonance, rather than the cronological truth...

Borrowing from R.J Stewart ("The Miracle Tree"), if the three streams of Qabalah - Sufi, Jewish, Bardic/Hermetic - work with agencies of awareness from all the dimensions, including the fields of consciousness of the Earth...I mean, how much is that different - school flavors apart - from what we generically call now "shamanism" ...?

(Peter Kingsley has traced back the spiritual roots of the West...to Mongolian shamanism...)

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

an alternative spiritual root other than shamanism

I read this great book called Shamanism: The Foundations of Magic, by Ward Rutherford. I found it by chance--I wasn't deliberately looking for a critique of shamanism. However, I find it good to have one, because that tern 'shaman (ism)' is SO over-used I feel, especially by the New Age, and its also made out that shamanism is the roots of our spirituality. But Rutherford argues that male-dominant shamanism had a rival! And that was the COMMUNAL ecstatic rites of the Goddess where all the participants took the mind-altering vegetation and became possessed. For the shaman this was seen as a threat to his sole authority (many 'shamans' will only have access to the psychoative plants etc, IF they use them). An example of our spiritual roots where there is no shamanic model is the originary ecstatic Dionysian Mysteries where all Celebrants take the ecstatic journey. For the danger of shamanism (and I am not putting shamanism down, just trying to show alternative roots) can be authority, and the disenfranchizing of those who come to depend on someone else dictating what the spirit world is, and for healing, AND in some cases the shamans can become scapegoats, because as they know healing they also are feared that they can harm too, and sometimes the tribe can scapegoat them, even kill them!

on the 'other'

Disclaimer: mysticism is not science

Powell's solution is presented as a hypothesis which implies scientific method so the burden of proof rests upon the one who introduces a third party - the other - to the encounter of mushroom and brain. 

That said, we have not seen a well designed experiment to support the assertion that "The resulting overwhelming confrontation with a spiritual intelligence is the result of information integration to the point where the integrative process appears to be alive, purposeful, and distinct from the self or ego. This is the transcendental Other, a sentient informative entity that is not us but something very closely related to us.”

I would assert that the evaporation of the ego construct provides a window on Truth so different from our censored "normal" consciousness that the subjective experience demands a mystical other, but as Pascal famously said, "Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis."

A very appreciable perspective

"Psilocybin solution" seems an interesting, well written essay. It touches on various themes running through popular psychedelic interest.  Flavius X's distinction of mysticism from science is, I think, crucial in this connection.  

 

Mystical experience, defined by key psychological criteria, is well verified as one pattern of psychedelic response among others.  Likewise, its profound personal power, acute and long-term impact, confirmed.  But the research doesn't show mystical epiphanies are 'just nature mysticism' (like Zaehner, in critique of DOORS OF PERCEPTION); nor argue they're ultimate revelations of cosmic purport, suggesting there really is an afterlife, or god or 'Other' etc. 

 

Mystical experience can be investigated methodically, but not to test whether its "just an illusion," or "more than that."  Broadening the point, could we prove merrily, life is (or is not) but a dream?  We can certainly believe or not, invest doubt or faith, argue one way or another.  But I find any greater implications of anomalous experience are beyond reach of scientific methods. They must stand on religious, spiritual, or philosophical ground.

 

Vivid experiences of god, angels (or an "Other") tend to stir wonder, and may convince one who has it.  But even then, a Scrooge (i.e., philosophical materialist) can rationalize it away: "just a bit of undigested plum pudding" -- just a dream, imagination.  We can whistle past the graveyard. And who knows, maybe there are no ghosts (even if we're scared there may be). But whether Scrooge's ghostly visitors were 'just a dream' or not -- made no difference for what happened to him as a result.  You'd think it might matter, for outcome, whether the ghosts were 'real' or 'dream.' 

 

The human significance of psychedelic experience hinges on what happens to people it touches.  How does it affect individuals and their relations, what course does it run in society?  How does it impress upon culture patterns and practices?  I suggest that's important in a way mostly overlooked by any metaphysical inklings or ideas it stirs.

 

Unlike personal interpretations, research doesn't argue "experiences of god show atheism must be wrong (else how would anyone meet him in a psilocybin trip?)."  Nor does it rationalize "this is just a drug effect, like a result of undigested plum pudding."  

 

 

Whether ghosts or "other' or deities experienced have some greater reailty or not -- may be less critical than commonly realized.  The power of such experiences, their human impact, seems real enough regardless.  

 

Complex subject matter on impression.  Especially considering the ambiguity of religious impulse and inspriation -- a double edge sword, maybe sobering.  It seems religious impulse, faith and conviction are dynamic. They have effects that are or tend to be adaptive or dysfunctional, i.e., for good or ill, individually and/or collectively.  As Wm James distinguished the 'sick soul' from 'healthy minded' religious expression.  Seems to bring out either the worst or the best in humanity, different places and times. 

 

The spiritual and religious nature of the mystical experience pattern, the impulse it stirs, is confirmed.  How does it play out, what effect upon society will it have over time?  What effect is it having even now?

 

 

 

taking the plunge

As Diana said in her penultimate sentence: "Follow directions in the last chapter closely. Confirm or deny."

Can you prove I exist? That I have consciousness like you do? There is no *absolute* way to prove this. The movie Contact also comes to mind where Jody Foster is asked whether she can prove that she loved her father. Some things are beyond science to prove (at least beyond a reasonable doubt). Other methods need to be employed. i.e. direct experience.

In any case, my contention in the book is that the Other is made of self-organizing information, as is consciousness itself. It is akin to being in a room full of big jigsaw pieces. If you add a certain catalyst, the pieces cohere and self-organize - thereby releasing/expressing meaning and import.

...communing with the

...communing with the Sophia...cognitive ecstasy

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson