Military Greenwashing

Twenty billion dollars of Obama's $787 billion stimulus package is going toward greening the military. With this new influx of funds, the Navy has already installed solar panels in housing units at a base in Hawaii and the Army has turned their Baghdad waste into usable energy. Future projects include a 500MW solar thermal power plant at Fort Irwin and better fuel cells for soldiers on extended patrols. Does the military have a genuine interest in green economics, or are these projects fodder for a new propaganda machine of “Green Saviors?” The answer may be both.
Whether we like to acknowledge it or not, much of the technology that now infiltrates our daily lives was pioneered with military applications in mind. Video games are the grandchildren of early missile simulators, and even the Internet itself started its life as a military research network. Often the military is the only entity rich enough (thanks to national budget spending) to invest in the infrastructure needed to test many scientific theories and designs. If a new technology is not applied here, it's unlikely that it will be tested for many years, if ever.
Do these efforts mean the military is starting to care about the environment? Probably not. By nature, green technology is extremely energy efficient and has the potential to advance current effectiveness in operational strategy and other fighting. However, the future benefits of such technology aiding our personal portability and independence may just outweigh this temporary greenwashing.
Image: "starry night" by army.mil on flickr courtesy of Creative Commons liscensing.
Tweet- 4-8-09
- Bridget Algiere's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version







Comments
Was bound to happen..
Military Industrial Complex
Nah
Greenwashing?
Rape
Not for one millisecond
do I believe it. The purpose of the military is primarily global domination and control of resources - particularly oil - and secondarily maintenance of territorial boundaries. A little nip-and-tuck in its own use of certain resources is nothing more than a minor alteration in the product line of the corporations that supply the military. Sure, they may use soldiers as guinea pigs for products they'll subsequently unload on the public. But will a few solar panels make the radioactivity resulting from use of nuclear weapons less deadly, or the consequences of chemical and bacteriological warfare less lethal? What about Agent Orange and the defoliants that the US has dumped on Columbia and Viet Nam? How green are those? Militarism is the purveyance of death, and no amount of window dressing will alter this.