Melchizedek: Ecological War
"Melchizedek - Ecological War" is an excerpt from Yakov Rabinovich's Stairway to Nowhere, published by Invisible books. The full text is available here.
"Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek."
I
In ancient Rome one was declared an outlaw with this formula: "he shall be denied fire and water," that is, one was to be refused all the simple necessities of human existence, such as firewood and drinking water, which nature offers free to all. By slow degrees of degradation we have been brought to where we buy clear water by the bottle and pay a week's wages to heat a modest home for a month. In some ways we're far worse off than Rome's outlaws, who at least breathed clean air! And we don't even seem to realize that, when every element -- earth, air, fire and water -- is fouled around us and offered back at a price, we're outlaws and warred upon.
As always, organized religion has failed us. The most forward-looking bureaucrats of the Book, in a desperate last-ditch effort to make themselves presentable, may now try to show they care about the planet. But in fact, the official scriptures, by the official reading, have nothing useful to say. The Quran of the mullahs views nature only as a demonstration of God's fine qualities: Nature's value is purely intellectual, and it isn't even meant to last. Everything's to be effaced on the imminent Last Day. Official Christianity is similarly eager for the end, when irreparably fallen nature will be improved into a paved city, the New Jerusalem.
Conventional Judaism has a sane relation to nature, but a neutral and pragmatic one with nothing to add to the ecology debate. Yet religion is indeed what we need to mobilize forces for the earth, and we have to seize back the scriptures from their unworthy stewards. Those who have translated and interpreted the scriptures for us have been men of conventional faith, whose piety censored and misrepresented the texts. But the great prophets of our shared traditions, Moses, Isaiah, Jesus and Mohammed, were archetypal dissidents, in every way alien to the committees that have translated them into English from the time of King James and George Sales on to the present day.
II
There is, for instance, a Hebrew word for ecological balance, and one of the most commonly occurring words in the Bible: tsedeq. It is translated, perfunctorily, as "righteousness," because to translate it fully and fairly, with its dazzling range of meanings, would have revealed an unacceptable degree of "paganism" in the Bible. At root, it means "rainfall in due proportion," and meanings like "rightness," "justice" and "righteousness" arose as extensions and expansions of the original meaning. This is no surprise. For the archaic societies of the ancient near east, important concept words are always deeply rooted in the realities of physical life. Abstractions, even for things like colors, don't enter the vocabulary of Hebrew until well into period A.D.
We'll get a clearer understanding of how tsedeq evolved by examining the parallel Egyptian world ma'at. It comes from the verb ma-a which originally meant "to rightly measure," and referred to the resurveying of the fields after the Nile's floodwaters withdrew each spring. The existence of private property depended on an accurate ma-a of the silt-covered land.
There is a large choice of glyphs with the same phonetic value in Egyptian, so the ones which are chosen can often signify a word's meaning. Ma-a is spelled with a mound of earth emerging from under floodwaters, a scythe, and an arm. This notion of rightness, evidently grew right out of the well-worked riverside acres. The word was early on made an abstract feminine noun, Ma-at, which means rightness both in the agricultural and moral sense.
Israel depended on rainfall as Egypt did on the Nile's flooding. Like ma'at, tsedeq came to take on a more general sense, but it evolved in ways far more profound and meaningful for us than ma'at. The genius of the Hebrews was to always adopt the best poetic and religious conceptions of their neighbors, but then deepen them with moral meaning. It was the chief god of the farming Canaanites, the storm god Baal, who guaranteed tsedeq, rainfall and crop growth. The Hebrews, who adopted so many features from this Canaanite Zeus, took over tsedeq as well, but enlarged it to create a view of the moral and natural worlds as inseparable. (Very unlike us Americans, who see ecological devastation as not a crime, but merely a pity.)
The word tsedeq, in its fullest sense, can mean "world in balance" both ecologically and politically. The eighty-fifth psalms says:
He's quick to save those who regard him with awe, his
glory shines across their country like sunlight,
fairness and generosity meet in how God treats a just
people,
the balance of the scales of justice, the balance of nature (tsedeq) coincide, sweetly they meet, like a kiss,
the land brings forth abundant wheat, abundant honesty beneath a sky clear as a conscience.
If God will grant us the power to be good, the land will
give us good things.
The ecological balance of the ancient near east was not the exclusive responsibility of the gods. The king, as vice-regent of the sky god, guaranteed his people the benevolence of earth and sky. The kings of Israel were monarchs on this sacerdotal model with a special moral dimension, as we see in the seventy-second psalm, a coronation hymn:
O God, make the king just! May his sons after him
maintain the world in balance (tsedeq), may he make society fair
and give the poor their rights
so the hills and valleys can bring forth their crops, the fair return for fairly paid work.
Let the king defend the rights of the poor, protect the impoverished, let him crush and humble those who cheat the people,
O king, do this and you'll be more glorious to your people than the sun, more splendid than the moon, remembered from
age to age,
you will be like the autumn rain that renews the mown
fields after harvest, like the heavy rains of winter that soak the
dry land to its depths.
In the days of such a king, good men, perfect men, will flourish, and abundance will be unaltering beneath the changing moons.
III
The god of the Hebrews appropriated not only specialized vocabulary from the Canaanites, but myths and images too. One can see something parallel in Milton's Paradise Lost, where the God of the Bible is sometimes referred to as "Jove," and Hesiod's battle of the titans was adapted to become the war of the rebel angels. The most important Canaanite myth Yahweh absorbed was that of Baal, the god of rain, who is every year defeated by Mot, the god of death and drought. Each autumn Baal returns with the autumn rains, to restore tsedeq.
Isaiah, Habakkuk, Joel, Hosea, and Nahum all draw on this myth for their apocalyptic poems. Isaiah's version gives a description of the country robbed of tsedeq, which foretells global warming:
The land is bleaching under the sun, pales as if sick with sorrow,
the world wears out, dries up, discolors,
noble, commoner, all fade under the heat.
It isn't just the time of year -- it's the time of reckoning!
The land was desecrated under its inhabitants! They broke
God's holy law, they twisted the statutes,
till the Eternal Covenant, the promise that the rains would fall
in season, the agreement between heaven and earth, was annulled.
That's what kindled this heat! Do you dare expect you'll
see clouds again?
That's why hot haze eats at earth like a curse. The guilty
with their land are drubbed under sunlight.
That's why the world burns all punishing summer, why so few still walk these streets of endless August.
I remember when we still had four seasons, not just one chill drizzling winter which lasted till June to be replaced by three months of greenhouse haze. And I remember the lies of servile scientists on the TV news, assuring us global warning wouldn't happen, that the weirdness of our weather was a normal variation. And now we have a generation of children for whom "Aprill, with his shoures soote" is as baffling for the meteorology as it is for the spelling. And we're all so happy to play with our cell phones seated high in our SUV's that none can be persuaded to care.
The prophet Habakkuk's second chapter ties global warming to capitalism, represented by Baal's old enemy Mot, the god of drought and death:
They wanted, they took. They had money and force, it was theirs.
Their fat faces gaped wide as the grave. They were Mot,
they became the god of Death -- they were never satisfied,
they harvested all the goods of the nations,
what belonged to every people they heaped up at home.
The contemporary circumstance that inspired Habakkuk was the Babylonian Empire, which differed from modern imperialism only in scale. In his seventh chapter, Habakkuk explains the final fate of empire in terms of the contradictions of capitalism:
Keep on shopping, haul it home, you've got credit, take
some more,
till quick as a snake bites the bill falls due: pay it all, with
the interest, now!
IV
Melchizedek appears for the first time in Genesis 14, in a scene set around 1800 B.C. Abraham has just rescued his nephew Lot, captured during a war between the city-states immediately south of Jerusalem. Returning victorious from battle, Abraham is acknowledged as ruler of the region by Melchizedek, king of Jerusalem, who utters this blessing:
Blessed be Abram
by God Most High,
creator of heaven and earth.
The impeccably monotheist blessing was added when the tale was written down, some 800 years after the events narrated. Melchizedek, petty king of a then inconsiderable Jerusalem, doubtless existed, though the name is actually a title. It means "I acknowledge the kingship of the god (Baal) who brings the rainfall." Names on this pattern, compounded with the word tsedeq, and indicating that this was a sacred king who magically represented the storm god in state rituals, were common among Canaanite sovereigns. A few centuries later Joshua will encounter another king of Jerusalem whose name is Adonizedek, which is identical, except that the word for lord (adon) is used instead of that for king (melek).
When Yahweh gave the Hebrews Jerusalem as their capitol, he gave them with it much of the cult of middle eastern sacred kingship. Psalm 110, a coronation hymn, acknowledges this:
The Lord has sworn it: he will not back down:
you are sacred king for all time, like Melchizedek.
The Hebrews saw themselves as a continuation of Canaanite civilization, just as the Germanic barbarians who became the kings of Europe saw themselves as the heirs of Rome. The Hebrew kings were all Melchizedeks, just as the Tsars and Kaisers were Caesars. And in the course of time Melchizedek became, as Caesar has in European literature, an independent mythological figure.
The Dead Sea Scrolls, the first-century A.D. library of the Essenes discovered in 1947, contains a scroll of Melchizedek. The Essenes practised a pure form of communism, and their scroll, written in the context of Israel's struggle against Roman domination, describes Melchizedek as an eschatological hero who will fairly redistribute property, defeat the armies of evil, and sound the ram's horn to announce abolition of all debts (the Jubilee). The scroll is valuable because it shows that the Melchizedek myth was drawn on as an important source of spiritual strength in Israel's struggle to the death against the Roman Empire. A struggle which was obviously anti-imperialist, and from the viewpoint of the Essenes, anti-capitalist.
So important a part of the national mythology was Melchizedek, that Paul acknowledges him in his letter to the Hebrews, written at roughly the same time as the Melchizedek scroll (though of course Paul is only mentioning Melchizedek to bolster the prestige of Jesus):
His name, in the first place, means "king of righteousness"; next, he is king of Salem, that is, "King of Peace." He has no father, no mother, no lineage; his years have no beginning, his life no end. He is like the son of God. He remains a priest for all time.
There is an Apocalypse of Mechizedek, preserved in the fourth-century A.D. library of Gnostic manuscripts found in Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in 1945. This book contains revelations made to Mechizedek by various angelic messengers. The fourth-century Cypriot bishop Epiphanius, in his book Against the Heresies, tells us enough to confirm that there was a Mechizedekian Christian sect and that the book from Nag Hammadi is theirs. This late account of Melchizedek is of interest to us because it provides an esoteric (though equally epic) counterpart to the Melchizedek of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Paul. This Melchizedek describes his own experience of gnosis, or ultimate self-recognition, thus:
O Father of the All, you have had pity on me and you have sent the angel of light from your aeons to reveal, he caused me to be raised up from ignorance, from death into life. For I have a name, I am Melchizedek, the priest of God Most High; I know that it is I who am truly the image of the true High Priest of God Most High . . .
Melchizedek is Christ! He recalls his crucifixion and his rising from the dead. He recounts how the angels announced his victory in terms that made it clear he was still the eschatological warrior of the Dead Sea Scrolls:
They said to me, "Be strong, O Melchizedek, great High Priest of God Most High, for the archons who are your enemies made war; you have prevailed over them, and they did not prevail over you, and you endured, and you destroyed your enemies."
V
We are called to use the concept of tsedeq (world in balance) to bring to the ecological struggle powers which are only unleashed by religious belief. In doing this we are entitled to the name of Melchizedek. The title of the old Canaanite priest-kings who guaranteed the land's tsedeq was more fully understood by Old and New Testament period prophets. It came to be the title of a royal warrior who defends sacred ecology and resists the forces of capital. The Gnostic Melchizedek of Nag Hammadi further deepens the figure into a one whose ultimate heroic act is that of achieving self-awareness: the understanding that he is the Melchizedek, that he has the annointed King, the Messiah, the Christ, within him.
We are all called to this new order or mystical chivalry, the Order of Melchizedek. Kingship is a powerful metaphor and has a long tradition of democratization and esoteric reinterpretation. The Stoics, who made it their ideal to live in accord with nature, secundam naturam, used to say that only the wise man deserves to be called a king, solus sapiens rex. This is the sort of kingship I have in mind, a gnostic one, that need only be realized to be made real, a royalty that can be shared by all, like that of Tennyson's Arthur:
But when he spake and cheered his Table Round
With large, divine, and comfortable words,
Beyond my tongue to tell thee - I beheld
From eye to eye through all their Order flash
A momentary likeness of the King . . .
This is the kingship of which Isaiah spoke, a royal defense of the whole natural world. His vision begins with the vindication of an injured tree, and expands into universal harmony of human with human and with every other species.
A branch will grow forth from Jesse's family tree, a
flowering bough rise up from the wounded stump,
and the spirit of God will rest on this last, best offshoot of
David's clan, a spirit of wisdom and insight, a spirit of courage
and wise policy, a spirit conferring knowlege of God and awe
of him,
and that son of David will eagerly breathe in the God-awe
like a delightful perfume;
he won't judge by appearances, by what his eyes see, or
decide by what his ears hear,
but he'll see justice done to the poor and protect the rights
of the wretched of this world,
and the sentences he pronounces will strike like a rod, the
sharp truth of his decisions will cut down the wicked,
he'll gird on righteousness (tsedeq) like a sword-belt, wear
honesty like armor;
then the wolf and the lamb will live together, the leopard
and the goat will sleep in the shade side by side,
the calf, the lion andf ox will be friends, and a little boy
will be able to lead them around,
the cow and the bear will graze together and leave their
young to rest in the same place, lions will eat straw like cattle,
and a toddler will safely play at the viper's hole and
securely stick his hand in the adder's den
None will harm and none kill anywhere on my holy mountain,
but the earth will be as full of direct knowlege of God as
the ocean is of water.
Image by copepodo, courtesy of Creative Commns license.
Tweet
- 1-26-09
- Yakov Rabinovich's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version









Comments
I really enjoyed reading this article.
Thanks so much; I can never get enough of truly recondite writers gettin' all pedagogical on this site! I got out a NIV Bible to follow along, and was disappointed at what the text had become. I remember arguing with one pastor of my Lutheran church, when I was much younger, about the language of scripture and about the benefit an "etymological Bible" might have on our understanding. He had been indoctrinated enough though, that this seemed a silly proposal. I think he's one of those that thinks the Bible has simply become more and more accurate due to the wilful and unintended errors throughout the ages. May our World be in right balance.
The ancients used to say: Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur - The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived. - Stanislaw Lem
Historicalization of myth...
Tzeddikim as shaman?
Knock it off, Ecolocal, that's really inappropriate!
Sacred Living Hyper-connectivity
"The person I wish to speak to, is you. And what I want to speak about is our so-called ‘nature’, which, in simple terms, is a way of pointing toward what we are and do in reality (rather than merely in human models or concepts).
I hope that you may find the inspiration to go seeking your own nature in your own way, for this is really the only ‘approved’ way of experiencing it, or learning more about it. Who is this way ‘approved’ by?
By everyOneThingWhereWhen. Essentially, it’s approved by the reality in which we exist and of which we are transient expressions. This reality is neither a thing, nor a being. It is more a metaBeingThingWay. That is to say, it is more than a being, inclusive of all things, and is a way of emerging into and departing from existence which is ever-more-diverse in its modes of expression and disappearance. (There are, it turns out, some metaphors or comparators which our common experience lacks. Many of them are combinations of those we already possess. You will encounter a few such combinatory terms in this essay: do not be alarmed. They are not indications of insanity or megalomania on my part. They are instead invitations to experience uncommon perspectives on ‘what-ness’ (the underlying class of identity to which some referent belongs)).
As all of us are aware, there are many extant traditions and religions, philosophies, &c., which would like to dictate to us what we must be or do or think in order to fulfil some sort of obligation which we purportedly acquired during the process of becoming human. The basic idea promulgated by these organizations is that our birth resulted in some ostensible debt which we must repay under pain of (insert any of a number of hideous punishments or losses here).
There are others, slightly more palatable, which imply that certain delights or rewards will be ours if we will only (insert various catalogues of difficult practices, avoidances, or procedures here). These latter are certainly the more civilized of the two, but both of these modes of admonition are outright lies. The fact is this: reality exists entirely without books and traditions.
Reality and living beings were doing this long before our species arose to representational awareness, and both will continue to do so long after our species departs the stage. Beings of every possible kind experienced both their natures, and the fulfillment of those natures without the aid of experts, traditions, texts, or even concepts! Truth be told, most experiences of actual fulfillment have nothing whatsoever to do with human conceptual models about them. Even those reached through the vehicle of some tradition are well-known to explode forth with such incredible and irreducible novelty as to defy every possible explanation or map!
Given this fact, which any of you may verify with a small amount of personal research, one is left to wonder why all of these traditions exist, and what their actual functions are. The answers to those questions are probably worth the effort required to reveal them, however it is not a part of my current intention to explore those questions in detail. Let it then suffice to mention a few relatively obvious features of the answers: humans generally believe in conserving information across the boundary of generations, because we believe that the only information that survives the death of those possessing it must have been recorded in such a manner (i.e. as an object) as to render it available to future generations (i.e. oral traditions, writing, &c.).
Although I find this idea just as rationally compelling as most people do, I do not really believe it, because it is my experience that there are other modes of accessible records which exist with or without the recordings of human beings."
(...) "Perhaps the single most urgent and important thing for us to realize is that Earth is a biocognitive unity — which, in simple terms, means that the sum of the experience of terrestrial life forms is a shared dimension.
Whatever is happening to any being here, is happening to all the beings here — and the complexity of the sum, is the complexity available to each individual — in a dimension we don’t yet believe in — simply because our sciences have not ‘discovered’ this dimension.
A long time ago, this dimension was called ’spirit’, which meant ‘the dimension in which all beings are connected’. The problem here on Earth is that the most complex creatures — humans — are extremely busy erasing the anciently conserved biocognitive complexity that surrounds us, and replacing it with mechanical and industrial momentums which torture and toxicify the entire terrestrial environment. Since this game of biocognition depends upon local and distributed complexity, health, and diversity the result of our activity is the erasure of the very source and basis of our own intelligence, and as this process proceeds — we are rendered less and less likely to be able to notice this effect.
We’re dumbifying the planet, and ourselves, by wiping out the complex animalian and vegetative biointelligence of our world. The more we erase, the less capable we are of noticing the results, because the results are inhibiting our relational intelligence in waves that magnify themselves exponentially.as the process proceeds. We cannot see what we’re doing for a simple reason: we don’t believe that there’s any connection between the health of the biosphere and our intelligence. Instead, we believe a fable — that intelligence is inherent to our persons or species.
It isn’t.
In fact, as anyone who even briefly examines this will see, human intelligence is a transmission game. The representational aspect is transmitted by contact with human cultures, and the inherent biocognitive aspect is transmitted by experiential immersion relations with living environments, as well as that invisible dimension we spoke of which connects all the life-forms of Earth in a web of co-emergent ‘likeness’.
The way Earth assembles intelligence is fundamentally relational, and our species rose to our seemingly-complex position in this game partly because in the genesis-phase of this rise, the biocomplex diversity of Earth and our experiential environments was explosively magnificent.
But something got mixed-up in our species, and very early on we began attacking the sources of our own relational intelligence: we made war against the animalian biosphere, and in so doing, we underwent a bizarre and systemic trauma where the damage we there inflicted was instantly reflected in ourselves, our activities, our potentials, and our cultures — just as it is today". From:
http://www.organelle.org/organelle/soulever/soulever.htm
Deep Living Peace
Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.
The lame have no claim to fame.
Bigotry isn't really about the scapegoated group so much as the psychotic political dynamics of the bigot's family. Atheism is just bigotry against religion. Bigotry is breaking the 9th commandment (Thou shalt not bear false witness), and the 10th commandment (Thou shalt not covet that which is thy neighbor's - e.g., thy neighbor's peace). It's a psychological error (mental illness) of projecting the shadow (Id) onto a scapegoat. The base emotion is envy (morbid jealousy). Common jealousy is when one lusts after something belonging to someone else. Envy is when that frustrated desire becomes a lust to destroy both the object and its possessor in narcissistic, infantile rage. There may be a brain chemical malfunction which causes a reinforcing high (see http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/11/081107-bully-brain.html).
An Agnostic is one who doesn't know what to believe, but is willing to explore. An atheist believes, like Nietzsche, that God is dead, or like Karl Marx, that God is merely an invention, a social "opiate for the masses". But again, atheism is less about God than about the atheist's father (or the lack thereof). Faith is as fragile and delicate as a bird's nest. Atheists enjoy destroying faith much as a foolish man uses a bird's nest to kindle a fire.
All religions have empathy in common:
"Compassion speaks and saith: Can there be bliss when all that lives must suffer? Shalt thou be saved and hear the whole world cry? However innumerable sentient beings are, I vow to save them! However inexhaustible the defilements are, I vow to extinguish them! However immeasurable the dharmas are, I vow to master them! However incomparable enlightenment is, I vow to attain it!' " The Buddha - (Dharma - the path to absolute knowledge.)
Atheists desire to annul the laws of the universe. Sorry, but if wishes were fishes we'd all be millionaires. There are immutable laws which even God must obey:
1. The Law of Universal Life and Motion.
2. The Law of Cause and Effect.
3. The Law of Alternation or Periodicity.
4. The Law of Progressive Development.
5. The Law Of Evolution.
6. The Law of Harmony.
7. The Septenary Law.
8. The Law of Karma.
("It knows not wrath nor pardon; utter-true Its measures mete, its faultless balance weighs..." -The Light of Asia - Sir Edwin Arnold)
If you walk with your nose in the air, expect to trip, then to walk with a limp.
All religions have empathy in common?
Belief is potentially deadly,is a frozen token,compared to an indescribable Being/Becoming, the Great Mistery, beyond any rigid toy/religion ...
I was living for two years close to Inquisition Lane, in Seville, Spain, where the heretics were carried to be burnt..well, is a strange kind of empathy with people that disagree with your belief.
I could feel the atmosphere of fear, horror, atrocity...in some moments in that place ...something to not forget, never...
.. crusades,torture, the screams of Giordano Bruno and hundreds of thousands of wise women called witches being burnt ...curious form of empathy...and this, mainly, in the patriarchal abrahamic religions(weapons of mind/heart destruction, by fear ,"punishment/reward"),
is that a coincidence?: sexophobia and its sick consequence: child abuse,women abuse, mysoginy,hipocrisy,
even buddhist wars between different sects...
I hear the screams of the mystics of all ages(experiential biospirituality, power of love) prosecuted by the hierarchies/inquisitions(lust of power, dissociated-from-Life zombies)..
Take a look at these three books:
"The Death of Religion and the Rebirth of Spirit", by Joseph Chilton Pierce ( a evolved human species, gnostic beings living in direct connnection from the Heart to Sacred Nature/Cosmos)
"Savage Breast" by Tim Ward ( an amazing psychological introspection, brutal honesty, about the effect of 2000 years of patriarchal religious misogyny in man/woman relationship),
"Original Wisdom" by Robert Wolff ( he describes, in awe, the last beautiful, completely human people, in the jungles of Malaysia,living a direct - (no churches,no rituals, no bureacracy of the Spirit),just Joy, Trust,Sacredness in each inmaculate moment- sacred relationship with Reality .
I remember the anguished scream of D.H. Lawrence:
"We have lost the cosmos, by coming out of responsive connection with it, and this is our chief tragedy... We and the cosmos are one. The cosmos is a vast living body of which we are still parts... What is our petty little love of nature—Nature!!—compared to the ancient magnificent living with the cosmos, and being honoured by the cosmos!"
Not belief, but sacred living experience
Deep Living Peace
Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.
Jesus helps me be nice to you
Judeo-Christian-Islamic dualistic theologies have devastatingly
stained the spiritual fabric of our world:
http://www.davidspero.org/teachings/metaphor.html
Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.
If I may?
First, great article. Well written, well thought out, interesting interpretations/translations of text from the various Scriptures.
The question seems to be arising, "Why should we attempt to reinterpret these old patriarchal mythologies that have cost us so much already?"
A decent question. But, I think it answers itself: They have cost us so much already, in their current interpretation.
There are many people in the world who believe quite strongly in these systems...and for most of the right reasons. To me, saying (or implying) anyone who still follows these systems deserves to die is foolish in the extreme. Far better to show people that they needn't up-end their entire spiritual lives to realize a new world. Far better to bring them back to the roots of the system (most of which are exemplary of everything we talk about on this site)...than to ask them to rewrite their faith entire.
Most especially when there is no need.
The various Scriptures speak far more in favor of the arguments most favored by the majority of the posters I have read; than those in general culture who claim to represent it's Truth.
They generally must take things alarmingly piecemeal to 'proof' their claims.
Reading the books (Torah, New Testament, Vedantas, Sutras, etc) from cover-to-cover proves most of the current 'interpretations' to be little more than quasi-beauracracies of spiritual enslavement -- far from the ever-revealing truth foretold by the Prophets.
And this is precisely what the Prophets, by and large, have warned us about.
To me, mythologies/religions are like languages -- and not much else. It is ridiculous, on its face, to expect a Zulu speaker to understand an Apache's words. And the two can get as mad at each other -- and attack each other -- as much as they want...it will never change their fundamental difference in language.
The same can be said for philosophical/spiritual matters. These are highly personal in their manifestations. That is not to say, as Russel would, that they are purely projections of the mind (although they are partly that), because various persons -- from various cultures -- performing similar techniques have recorded remarkably similar results. The individual experiences may seem idiosyncratic on their face; but a closer examination shows them agreeing to a point that is far beyond chance in the overall analysis.
This is a hallmark of science: repeatable, verifiable results from a reconstructible experience. Everyone who reaches the Depths might not agree on what the face of God looks like...but they all agree they have seen the face of God.
Therefore: a Christian, a Hindu, and a Buddhist, for example, would think they have very little to agree upon. They might argue for hours -- even days -- if each one stuck to his or her particular 'jargon'.
If, however, they began to ask each other the meanings of the various words...if they began to delve into the direct experience that motivated the 'calling' of the persons...if they attempted to learn each other's language -- rather than demanding that everyone speak theirs -- they might begin to find that they are all talking about the same thing...however different their words may sometimes make it seem.
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi
No question
It also seems to be increasingly clear to more and more folks I interact with that, predictive to our relationship with one another is our relationship with our Earth. Our little blue solar nursery and our relationship with it being the foundation for all the relationships we will ever know. Meaning, when we examine our relationship with our home we need look no further to see how we are treating all other organisms we interact with... As we know by now it's all related from the grandest cosmic scale to the most minuscule dimensions of quantum physics.
If our relationship with the Earth is malnourished the Earth will decay. These frameworks do not hold the nutrients necessary for a fruitful existence.
There is a way of knowing that is not anthropocentric and encourages organismal harmony. It starts with ancient, local lore. It effortlessly winds it's way through space and time, folding the fabric of reality with the whimsical fluttering of imagination. It ends with a smile, contentment and the realization of the infinite.
Mayhap
To my perspective, that sort of polemical, intolerant treatment of those who believe differently is what has caused those systems of belief to degrade into the false forms they now display.
I would argue that any belief system -- whether Earth-centered and immanent, God/Man centered and transcendent, or any combination -- will inevitably degrade to that level of pathology if bigotry of, and contempt toward, other ways of knowing and believing is a part of their matrix.
Truly, I would heartily recommend a bit of patience and understanding with -- yes, compassion for -- those who do not believe as we do. Otherwise, we shall become that which we claim to stand against...inevitably.
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi
Intolerance
If I came off as intolerant than it's only in the face of strictly linear flows of energy and those that would encourage such nonsense, blatant or indirectly.
Be it spirit, mind, matter or any other dimension of reality, If an organism is not allowed to realize it's sacred purpose, purposes which are more diverse than the sum of all the letters scribbled in all the sacred texts combined, purposes which in their totality amount to responsible habitation with all organisms great and small, for the benefit of all organisms great and small than there is an intolerable obstruction in the flow of energies and that is the cause of the disharmonious habitat. I am simply confronting the beast.
I am wholly intolerant and harshly judgmental towards any belief system that presumes superiority whilst simultaneously extinguishing that which gives the system life.
No loving mother knowingly clips the wings of her children.
Patience and understanding are superb gestures but I fear they have fallen into the abyss of 'civility' and 'etiquette' rather than actual responsibility. Our wits and intentions must be sharpened. We've been dulled by millenia of degradation and isolation to our own detriment and have largely lost contact with the one thing that deserves our ceaseless adoration.
There is nothing sacred or deserving of omnicide, and doubly so when it is wearing the guise of the golden rule.
"Otherwise, we shall become that which we claim to stand against...inevitably."
If you're going to stand against anything make sure it is well built or you will fall... inevitably.Its not that I disagree with most of your ideas...
"I am wholly intolerant and harshly judgmental towards any belief system that presumes superiority whilst simultaneously extinguishing that which gives the system life."
Well, your beliefs are your own, and you are welcome to them. I can agree with much of that, as well. And I have often stated that there are no people I hate, only beliefs...and any person could always change their mind.
Language of judgementality and anger can be a barrier to that however.
If one is speaking to people who already agree with the statement being made, then it can be an effective technique to rally together. If one wants, however, to be able to bring their message to those who are not already of the same frame of mind, then a more understanding and ecumenical tone is recommended.
It has been my experience that the instant someone feels insulted, they stop listening.
This, to me, seems to be the last thing we either want or need. The Truth, I have long felt, can stand up for itself. Even when whispered, it can ring in the head like a cannon-shot ever after. Hurt, however, can hide the Truth by causing us to look away from it...and so, never see.
Transformation is a process of evolution; not exhortation. Patience with the process of others is of paramount importance for their own personal realization, I truly believe.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink...you can, however, prevent it from doing so if you scare it away from the shore.
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi
Direct contact
"There is a way of knowing that is not anthropocentric and encourages organismal harmony. It starts with ancient, local lore. It effortlessly winds it's way through space and time, folding the fabric of reality with the whimsical fluttering of imagination. It ends with a smile, contentment and the realization of the infinite".
Yes,yes,yes! Thank you, your words resonate with complexity/simplicity and elegance...natural beauty is a safe guide..
There are multiple avenues with heart that lead to the no-path path:
Relationship with the Sacred Imagination
http://www.deepimagery.org/index.php?id=71
Contemporary wilderness rites of passage: http://www.animas.org/whatIsSoulcraft.htm
Relationship with the "felt sense":
"Your physically felt body is, in fact, part of a gigantic system of here and other places, now and other times, you and other people, in fact the whole universe. This sense of being bodily alive in a vast system is the body as it is felt from inside."
Eugene T. Gendlin, Founder of "Focusing."
http://www.futureprimitive.org/interviews/124
Deeply body-felt, free-dogma ritual technology, preferibly outdoors :
http://www.verticalpool.com/archeology.html http://www.futureprimitive.org/interviews/86
Free-movement ecstatic energy work(transmission from Bushmen, the oldest culture on Earth, who value, above all, raw ecstatic experiential spirituality):
http://www.futureprimitive.org/interviews/62
and on and on...
Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.
Wanderer, your footsteps are the road, and nothing more
Wanderer, your footsteps are the road,
and nothing more;
wanderer, there is no road,
the road is made by walking.
By walking one makes the road,
and upon glancing behind one sees the path
that never will be trod again.
Wanderer there is no road—
only wakes upon the sea.
~Antonio Machado
Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.