Support our Kickstarter

Meditations on Another Iraq War Teach-In

iraq_boots_largeB.jpg

 

I sat down this morning to write something for an Iraq war teach-in I was supposed to speak at and found that I had nothing to write. So I’ve written about this.

What do you say about a nightmare like the war in Iraq? Do I talk about the money spent? The lives lost? Do I talk about the banal pleasures of life – going to the market, playing with your children, sitting at a café talking with friends – that are made near impossible in a country at war? Do I talk about the distance and denial that allows us to enjoy these precious banalities here in this country? Do I talk about oil and empire, about private contractors and Blackwater mercenaries?

What point can I make that hasn’t already been made? What audience can I reach that hasn’t already been reached? I’m a critic: I criticize, but what good does critique do now?

The war in Iraq is widely acknowledged as a nightmare. Yes, John McCain has renamed the bus of his floundering campaign "No Surrender," and the Republicans in Congress have again blocked the tepid moves of Democrats who’d like to wind down the war. But these moves are not bold statements of belief in the War, rather they are cynical political positionings. The argument is over. The vast majority of the people in this country are against the war. They know it is a nightmare.

Then why does the war continue? Despite the daily revelations of devastation and incompetence it continues. And despite the continued criticism and critique the street demonstrations get smaller, the teach-ins less attended. Who is left to convince? What more is there to say?

"The ruthless criticism of all that exists," a young Marx wrote to his friend, laying out his political plans for the future. A few years later he appended this, writing that "philosophers have only interpreted the world…the point, however, is to change it." The protesters of an earlier American imperial war taunted: "Hey, Hey, LBJ. How many kids did you kill today?" but they also chanted: "Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh. The NLF is gonna win."

Who do we want to win this war? What change can we imagine?

As a critic, faced with the challenge of the future and not just the disaster of the present, I find I have nothing to say.

The Washington neo-cons who began this war and the Islamic militants who execute it on the streets of Baghdad have something I don’t have, they have something we don’t have. They have a dream. Free market or fundamentalist state. Their dreams are my nightmares. Nevertheless, they dream.

What dreams can we offer to to awaken from this nightmare?

 

 

Image: "Iraq War - Eyes Wide Open" by HDragon used through a Creative Commons license.

Comments

The End of Empire

Hi Stephen,

 Yes the Iraq War and current politics is a nonstop atrocity exhibition. 

I think there is plenty to say, but it requires following a different path than the ordinary protest rhetoric.  I recommend the book "Multitude" by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, which to me is the most important advance in political philosophy I have read in modern times. Among the points they make in this masterpiece is that "War" has become the central organizing principle of contemporary civilization. "War has become a permanent social relation," they write. The Iraq War is the endpoint of the logic of Empire. "The revolt of the mercenaries" (such as formerly US-backed allies, Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein) signals the beginning of the end of Empire. Historically, the collapse of Empire is also foreshadowed by the transition from a people's army to a mercenary army. The US is Rome in its last days.

 We are in a new situation, and it requires new thought and new tactics to approach it properly, and hopefully to help empower its truly transformative potential.  This work is a collaborative effort that will be a main focus of discussion and articles on Reality Sandwich in the future.

 

 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

A Train Racing Towards a Cliff

I tend to agree with Daniel on "Multitude" by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt; we are on a train speeding towards the cliff where rails will no longer exist.

It will not be the ride that is the danger; it will be sudden fall.

frightening but true

This all resonates very strongly with me. The well-rehearsed routine of war is so deeply ingrained now that it will take something very revolutionary indeed to get us dug out of the ruts.

The Irony

The irony of this colossal train wreck is that the solution is but a thought away; the thought must come from within each person.

No guru, no hipster, no politician, or any outside symbolic medium will do it.

What must be kept in mind is the great length of time this train wreck has taken and the speed at which it is now moving.

It took until the 19th century for the human to reach a billion people on the planet; we have been in our current human form for 100,000 years. Today we are 6.5 billion humans and by 2050 current projections of humans is to peak at nine billion.

Has anyone noticed the similarity of the human as a cancer on the body of Gaia? The remission of our cancerous ways will come from the individual to see its relationship to the whole and each act accordingly.

The cure will not come from an outside treatment via a symbolic surgery, chemo therapy, or such outside source.

We have thought ourselves into this symbolic train wreck and it will only be a thought that at this time can save ourselves from ourselves. 

peace

Rome Fell indeed, from Rome's founding with one brother killing another to the founding of the US, it seems little has changed. Can it be said that every nation state has been founded on oppression and murder? Drawing lines on maps to determine class structures, divide and conquer etc.

Systems of programming/education telling us what not to do, defining specific tracks to create willing citizens with strong national allegiances. . .

this war, that war, any war is a wrong war. . . but again discussion through the negative seems such a clumsy process. Peace yes, life yes, humanity yes, sharing yes, collectivism yes, awareness and understanding at the individual level yes

 

frustrated

I was just walking to my office this morning and a sudden depression hit me. For a self-proclaimed beacon of democracy, why do so many people in our country feel so helpless? Why are we so unheard? The vast majority of the public wants the war to end, and yet we can't make it happen. The irony is chilling.

In a conversation I had yesterday, I asked a friend what could be done besides protesting. He suggested we support the GI's who have become objectors to the war. In the meantime, there is a large sense that something will happen, that we are on the verge of a tremendous shift. And this tension is stifling because I feel like we are waiting, waiting, waiting...

Namaste. --EB--

Candidate-for-president Mike Gravel

Sure, he seems a madman on stage, but he made an interesting visit to The News Hour the other night. A self-proclaimed theorist, he said that within a hundred years we will cook ourselves from the planet.

 

If you have little children move to a higher, northern climate where the soil is good. Teach them survival skills. Teach them as many pagan myths and legends as you can find. Teach them to love without prejudice. Be wise grand parents to their children.

The prophesies are true... some will survive.

i agree with Kal's

i agree with Kal's comment.  

as it is, philosophy is only one of many interpretations of reality, and perhaps not best steps towards a solution, sometimes it even distracts.

i completely empathasize with the frustration of what Stephen and others have expressed. What can be said? What can be done?

Something transformatively different, relevant, while making a potent impact?

Perhaps, something more subtle than obvious revolutions + etc may be demanded from us. There is something very important for us to learn and discover from this situation.  Maybe, we can learn a lot about ourselves. 

The basis of conflict is this: Somebody believes in something, somebody else believes in something else -- as long as one believes only one's way is right, and the other believes something else is right - naturally conflict cannot be avoided.

what can change here?