Meditation for the People

10_header.jpg

The SelfCentered meditation workshop is a brand new, cutting edge workshop that is teaching people to meditate on their own terms, in their own unique way.

Recently featured in Body and Soul Magazine, and LA Yoga Magazine, the one time, two hour long workshop examines the classic meditation techniques and philosophies right alongside new and contemporary scientific studies and other modern expressions.

Led by SelfCentered's energetic teachers, called "Awareness Architects," the meditation for the people workshop is unique in the way that it enables each participating student to fashion their own unique meditation practice and guiding philosophy.

The SelfCentered meditation workshop's mission is to stop "costing people out" from serious meditation training (while still making regular meditation practice possible for people who do not have the time or interest in a exclusive religious or spiritual tradition, or classes).

Additionally, SelfCentered events include weekend out of your mind immersions, conscious indulgence parties, public displays of meditation, and meditation teacher training.

To check out the schedule or to sign up for new workshops in New York and LA happening this month, click here.

 

Comments

doable

There is a phenomenon going on that is highly worrisome: people feel afraid and so they stay inside and get their 'connectivity' by watching tv and listening to radio.

And they go 'stir-crazy' and undergo a kind of 'cabin fever'.

This term came to the fore of public awareness after the Alaskan 'Gold Rush'.

Isolation induced many of these people to go completely insane.

Folk-tales of 'survivors' as written up in magazines like "True West" and others discussing the 'old West', written by people who had actual contact with some of these people or who could pass it on, contains an abundance of indications of not just 'madness' but insights of how the mind connects with other minds and so saves itself from just 'going nuts'.

One such story I recall was of a minor who survived the depravations and isolations of being 'snowed in' by talking to a mouse. Feeding the mouse, taking care of the mouse. The mouse saved this soul as much as this soul saved this mouse.

People are going crazy right now because they are being impinged upon by a wide spectrum of nutty folks in power. Pressing down on their lives.

People want some help, some 'salvation' or relief.

Lacking a personal 'guru', I think it highly logical that by sharing and investigating and communicating back and forth, people can expand their own consciousness into 'regions of relief'.

I praise this article. I praise this effort. As long as people share and keep all things equal in terms of consciousness, they aren't likely to become egotists or megalomaniacs. Discussion of insights, if not too private or personal, can empower and further the motives of each ones' 'inner god'.

I think this 'inner god' is rather 'cloned' and something general and nothing unique, save perhaps, where a lineage or history is concerned of planetary causes or solar causes. Not EVERYONE can be the 'man in the sun'. Or the 'mother in the earth'.

We might at least admit that there are some souls much older than we are in terms of our environs.

That might be a form of communion that can be discussed and shared and not neccessarily devolve into some new kind of 'worship' or 'religion'.

'Yoga' or 'union' is both a discipline and an effect of effort. We are well advised by the best experts that 'doing' should be the focus, and not 'effects' or 'rewards'. That is part of the time-proven pragmatism that IS valuable about yoga. But the idea that this approach can only be garnered by 'disciplic succession' or direct contact with some 'master' is rediculous. Especially since we know how many times this 'succession' merely proliferated error of the 'master' and the master's master. So using the term 'rebellion' as a pejorative for the natural or human impulse to doubt probity of 'authority', is unwarranted. This is not rebellion, but side-stepping rebellion. Why? Because the idea of 'disciplic succesion' or 'guru-parampara' implies 'direct contact' with Cause or source of impulse isn't trustworthy or is dangerous. So we either do or either don't have direct, internal contact with consciousness. What do you think?

But we are not alone. Are others less than one? You're an egotist. Are others somehow better than one? Then you're a sycophant. Believe in your self. Believe in the self of others. That is what 'all one' means.

So a community effort like this is a scientific experiment that really tests this 'guild concept' of 'realization', and may prove the egalitarian ideal that gave birth to the American Dream: All one. All for one, one for all. All, essentially, equal.

I think this is wonderful. I think it safe if for no other reason than numbers . . . as long as participants are open and honest and tell the truth. I am certain of only one thing: the inner soul hates a lie. And that inner soul is most kind. So lying is, evidently, not a good thing. Suit action and words to intent. Don't talk the talk if you don't walk the walk. I'm sure what is aimed at is most kind, fair and honest. This is American 'UNION' or 'yoga'.

I second this.

Addendum:

I guess I might have studied what this all entailed and know what-all was being proposed. When, in hind-sight, I went after the links, and found the discussion of 'money', I thought: dumb-ass. Fooled again!

I'd have been much more impressed if participants were paid to participate.

This is Peter pays Paul all over again.

In the New Testament, in the book of 'Acts', we read of Peter cursing a man named Ananias and his un-named wife for 'holding back' from the 'community'.

And Peter scared Ananias to death and his wife, to death for 'lying to the "Holy Spirit"'.

This is NOT what I meant in saying that consciousness hates 'lying'. 'Lying' as I intended was to oneself. To one's own conscience. You lie all you like to outer men or women, also liars. Fine. Lying to one SELF is self-defeat. What Self says to say, say. What Self says to do: do. If you say: okay, I will and don't, that is lying most betraying.

Meditation, 'yoga' or self-work doesn't cost a dime.

If you can't have faith in exploring the innermost, then don't. If you think you are going to 'buy' access to 'I AM' or 'membership' in some 'insight', you are a fool.

That is the big lie.

Not one penny for membership to humanity!

And, maybe even, not going to want to be a member of a community that pays me a penny!

I'll do my work. I may work from dawn to dark and get just a penny. And you may work from even to dark and also get such a penny. Good for you.

I'm disgusted.

Really tricked. I un-second this. This is disgusting. Almost. No cigar. Bastards.

======================
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation." HERBE

Roger,

Roger, I liked the enthusiasm of your posts.

I am a certified Meditation and yoga teacher.

Here's why meditation courses like this, in my own opinion, might not be quite as bad as you think, financially.

Because the workshop is designed for people who, first of all, WANT holistic health help and are ok with paying an instructor.

They are sitting around and they are thinking, "I want to feel more centered. I want to feel happy. I want to feel grounded. Etc etc. I need a meditation class or something."

For whatever reason someone is feeling like they could really benefit from a meditation practice but they have no idea how to start their own, what to do, how to breathe, if they have to join a religion, take a class, adopt a philosophy, etc.

 

So how does that person find out what meditation means for them and how to have their OWN practice? Well that's what SelfCentered's meditation workshop is about, and a 100$ price tag for a 2-3 hour long workshop that teaches you what you need to know to have your own, personalized, practice, to me (I live in Manhattan and take yoga classes 4-5 times a week) is a great deal! Plus you never need a class again afterwards and can teach your friends for free!

 

So I think its a matter of perspective. And like I just said--the more people who are meditating out there without creed or set method...just because its a good thing to do...the less we'll need teachers and workshops anyway. But, for myself, I don't have the time or resources to do something like that for free.

 

Again, the more I teach and get paid, the more people out there will start showing others how you don't even need me to learn how to meditate anyway! But they might still have to come to me for yoga class, so I'm still going to make a living!

:-)

 

Hope this response is a friendly challenge to your post. Also want to point out that both of your responses felt extreme and polarized to me. Maybe if you took some time to meditate before you wrote you wouldn't have rushed the first treatise before looking at the price tag?

Do you have a few bucks and some free time? I can teach you. hehe jk jk

 

love,

 

Adam Elenbaas

Instinctive Meditation

Hi friends, I feel/think this the most natural, healthiest, deepest, simplest approach to meditiation I have ever found in all my life... http://www.lorinroche.com/

Warm greetings

Zorro

Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.

yes Virginia, uh Roger there is a Santa, uh conspiracy...

but with the enormous influx of information shoved down the gullet of everyone a few moments of quiet time could only even if horribly mismanaged by the individual be beneficial...and Zorro, shut up about the babysteps, I'm hurling myself full throttle leap at the mouth of the dragon sword first and don't try and stop me LEEEEEEEEEEEROOOOOY JEEEEEEENKINS!!!!!!

I aint no teacher

I'm myself. Maybe, according you, 'certifiable'.

Unlike you, I have no 'certificate' . . . for being myself.

How does one become 'certified' in teaching 'union' with oneself? Does not 'yoga' mean 'union'? Well, then, 'union' with what? The commercial concept? Or 'self'?

We, all, can talk about that all day. And we gonna charge for that? Write a book. Write an autobiography. Take charge of that. Make money on that. But charge for talking, face to face, to another? Charge for conversation? And call that 'teaching'? NNNNN. Not, personally, going there.

I'm into 'no secrets'. What I have heard in secret, I shout from my rooftop. For free.

I'm sorry for saying 'bastards'. That was hasty on my part.

Also, I promise not to judge you for what you are choosing to do there.

It's just it wasn't what I thought it was, and I was, I am, disappointed.

But that's in the past now. I hastily perceived a community sharing which wouldn't have to involve money. So, I guess, maybe I'm judgemental despite what I said above, since I perceive there's some 'secret' that some folk are gonna have to pay for.

Yet, they can share 'for free' what they paid for.

And, I also guess, you might ponder how much of this 'sharing' is going to be an accurate representation of what you actually said or did.

Whereas in a communal sharing of just common experiences, no responsibility is involved except personal responsibility. No 'karma' involved.

Whenever I'm in New York, tho', I'll happily buy you a cup of joe or maybe a brusky, and we can share our thoughts and more fully explain each other to each other. And I promise not to charge ya.

Thanks for responding.

Roger, It's funny that you

Roger, It's funny that you used the word "community" and the word "event" to describe your perception.

Both are very ontologically defined "things." What does community "mean" to you?

What does an "Event" mean? Or for that matter, what does "union" mean? Can you define these things absolutely? Should you be able to?

I guess the point I'm getting at is that you seem to have some very rigid definitions of what you expect community, sharing, meditation, and SelfCentered, to be. There is a paradox there worth exploring.

Who are you to say that anything about your ideas of community, sharing, union, or an event are the best ways? Who says money or the market place are absolutely evil? By what authority?

My point is not to say that your distinctions, expectations, and visions of truth or beauty are not correct. My point is to say that you are not without your own prescriptive thoughts.

But I think that the difference in being a teacher of your thoughts, in the long history of spiritual teachers, is that you are careful to express those ideas in a constructive, nurturing, friendly, and loving manner.

What I felt from your first post was extreme joy and praise. Your second the complete opposite. I'm convinced that the posts are actually identical expressions of the same thing within your heart: passion.

It's not the rightness or the wrongness of something that justifies that passion. To me, it's you, your own identification with eternity, your consciousness, that is itself justified by its very existence---in each moment.

But we're constantly seeking for that justification. There's no "secret" I have to teach anybody. But people, myself included, desire to be in relationship with teachers. How absolutely one perceives the authority of teachers and their own ideas is a matter of ones own journey.

While you are shouting from the rooftop, don't forget that some people feel more comfortable going to a classroom. Can your shouting from a rooftop respect that yours is not the only voice screaming, and screaming is not the only way to scream?

Because personally, as a teacher of yoga and meditation, and after a number of years of working with shamans in Peru, I can tell you that the students I see failing at what they want to accomplish, the most often (including myself), confuse their brightest ideals and their darkest forms of rebellion and anger.

 It happens to good souls who were wounded. Maybe thats you?

 

 

Like good Jedi's leaving Yoda's swamp too early! We visionaries and psychonauts and artists, etc, etc, have to be careful and disciplined. Otherwise we present absolutely beautiful ideas of love that have no absolute grounding in our own work ethic. Right here, on this page. 

 

I don't drink coffee or beer, but I would love for you to buy me a hot tea, and we could meditate together in public at Times Square (selfcentered does great public displays of meditation here in New York).

 

Adam Elenbaas

Babysteps? Yeah! That's the way to realize your "BabyMind"

Dear vivifidal, the approach proposed by Lorin Roche is rooted in the instinctive, wild (meaning not tamed by any "control", numinous unfolding wisdom of our Primordial Nature, as described in the "Vijnana Bhairava Tantra", non-dual inclusive mysticism covering all the range of human experience (body, emotions, sexuality..).

Baby steps? Don't make me laugh, dear vivifidal.. ; )

Of course!! Listen to the words of one of the most advanced kundalini yoguis : "That is called [Yogic developmental] action of the body in
which reason takes no part and which does not originate as
an idea springing in the mind.
To speak simply, yogis perform actions with their bodies,
like the movements of children."
Jnaneshvar, 1987, p.102

Warm hugs

Zorro

Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.

There's a significant difference

What I shout from my roof-top is different from what you teach and charge for in a class-room: I don't charge and people can just say: he's nuts. YOU, they'll think, because he's a 'teacher' and in a 'class-room' is to be more respected than that nut 'roger' telling it all from his roof.

If you can't see that, then I can understand why you might not see things I have spoken in my 'passion' about the way I do things and say things versus the way you do things and say things. Still, bottom line: I don't charge for sharing my insights, you do. You have materialized and commercialized something that is most common. In this instance, I will not say: You go do that. Though, evidently, no one will stop you.

As for me: I'm not going there. Why? Because I know from first hand experience that that path is very misleading and very dangerous for both sides of the equation. You put money in something so basic as that, you are, by accepting the concept of 'charge' polluting something ever free. Like I said: you want money for time: baby sit.

Have you, in your vast experience, never read the traditions: charging a fee for things that are already free is robbery?

That's what I'm calling it. Dig ditches if you need money, don't get involved charging a buck by pretending at 'teaching' people how to know themselves. 'Cause in so doing, they are just passing the buck to you for being lazy, and it is you who is going to have to answer for that. That's just my measly little opinion and only out of concern for you or others like you. I see it as just lazy blankety blank.

I am fully aware you aren't asking for advice. On the off chance you might wish for it, here it is: Just drop it. I'm not going to talk about this anymore. You know my thought on it. IMO, it is not a good idea to assume such a position for money . . . EVER. This is not a commercial concept. Period. It is utterly outside that. Just forget it.

Not 'everything is just okay'. Or is the 'cosmos' for sale?

Please don't call me a 'socialist' either. I work for a living and don't think what counts can be bought or sold. I wouldn't want, ever, such to be. So my objections. Okay? Okay.

Go Roger

Exactly.  I get so excited when I see adverts for gatherings like this...and then realize that they 'require' a 'love donation' of $50 or more. 

I work 60 hours a week for barely enough to get by, and I can't even find a decent community to join without paying money.  I refuse, and reject it.  And will forever.  You will never get money from me to teach me 'how to be truly myself'. 

If I have to die alone, in a gutter, I will not *ever* reinforce such deceipt.  Accepting donations in private from those willing -- *and able* -- to give them is one thing.  Requiring payment for 'your chance at enlightenment' is something entirely different.

There is a reason they call it "selling water by the riverside" in Zen.

 

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi

agree to disagree

 

If you work for 60 hours a week to barely get by, then maybe you should find a new job or look for a way to make more money? That's if and only if your financial situation and your "barely getting by" are happiness/peace altering factors that are causing you lots of turmoil.

I'm a social worker in Manhattan, for example, and don't make much money, but the money I do make I like to spend from time to time on taking classes, visiting with healers, and traveling to do interesting things or enjoy interesting meals, etc.

We live in a world that has markets and money. You can forever dislike money and the market on principle, but the bottom line is that each and every day you are still choosing to spend what you have on what services you think you most need.

The bottom line is that every single thing in the universe you could ever choose to spend your money on is "water being sold near the river." Because every single thing in the universe is alive and present and natural in terms of its eternal value.

Roger wrote, "I don't think what counts can be sold." I guess my response is: and what price did you pay to learn that lesson, or are you still paying some kind of price?

Was it in dollars or in experience?

Because it sounds like you have an experiential and "monetary" chip on your shoulder that might need to be given back or spent. Can you allow dollars and experience to coexist, or not? And if not, then why is your experience acting just like the currency you despise--determining across the market of existence what is valuable and what isn't?

 

Look, I'm with you. I don't think that people should be duped or taken advantage of. But I have a hard time with the accusatory tones, the cynicism, and the rebellion. It simply feels like these posts are ways of attacking and lashing out at something you are not taking the time to love--namely me and the workshop I've given a lot of my heart to creating.

Why can't you be kind? Where are your principles in the realm of human interaction and intimacy and love?

We need to get past all the ways in which woundedness informs our perceptions and our principles. There are many people who would like to know more about meditation, and they would like to know how to start their own practice...one that is not related specifically to any particular tradition or "way of doing it."

And for some people, it's worth using some of their dollars for in a world that has a market and money. Corporations pay us all of the time to teach their staff how to relax and meditate in a non religiously specific way.

What a gift to give your workers! In our workshop we blow through some of the meditation myths and pageantry in order to help people find their own independent practice, and we do it in one dynamic and powerful class that we've designed.

We hope that its innovative, fun, and helpful for people seeking guidance. And we don't care if you think its too much money. Then, you know, don't come! We pass no judgments on your financial values or priorities.

 

Adam Elenbaas

It isn't you

That I have a problem with.  It is the practice of 'selling' spiritual truth and practice, and the system which has created conditions that make it something anyone would even consider doing.  I do apologize for the venom of my previous comment, as I was in a bad space when I wrote it, and I did not mean it to be anything personal.

I have been on this path for some time, and the one thing I have hungered for more than anything is a community -- a real community of live people, not an online group -- to begin practicing and participating with.  And, every time, money turns into an issue that keeps me away.

I'm sure your workshop is a wonderful thing, for those with money.  And that is the crux of the 'monetary chip' that I have on my shoulder.  I refuse to participate any more than I absolutely must in a system that I find disgusting. 

I am working hard towards building something close to what you are doing: I hope to purchase some land, and begin creating a space to hold retreats and workshops of exactly that nature.  I am working on a series of fiction novels to (hopefully) finance it, and am working in seminary school so that I can be 'legally ordained', and have the property recognized as church property, so I don't have to pay taxes on it.  And I will happily accept donations, given in private, from any who attend and can afford it. 

My girlfriend makes jewelery, and is a very talented painter in oils, and we will attempt to sell her creations during the gatherings.  Ideally speaking, I will have the buildings outfitted with solar panels, and output any excess energy to the national grid, and let the power companies pay me for electricity. 

You see, I am not above making money.  But I will not be selling the truth.  People with no money who want to come will be able to do so, and the fact that they didn't pay would be both confidential and irrelevant.  I wouldn't be telling them to not come, that I'm not judging them for being poor, but that doesn't mean I will let them in. This, of course, means I won't be able to support a consumeric, American lifestyle.  But that is part of the point.

And, for the record, I of course am always on the lookout for a better job, as long as I don't have to sacrifice too many ideals to work it.  I don't work 60 hours a week to barely get by because I like it.  It is purely because I can't find anything better.  The instant I do, I'm out.

 

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi

I agree....thank you for

I agree....thank you for your sensitive reply.

I empathize with your position, and money is so hard, especially right now. I think we're all in the process of learning some incredibly difficult but enriching things about the illusion of money.

Thanks for engaging with me. This is what its all about. And thanks for assuring me your comments weren't personal. I so need to have a community of love right now. It's so important to me.

much love,

Adam Elenbaas

there's a simple solution

Organic foods are a higher value because they require more attention to grow properly. Books cost money because a writer puts a tremendous amount of time and energy into creating them. Why should a meditation training be any different? The solution to this debate seems simple (to me): if you feel there's value in a personalized training, then spend the money. If you don't, then don't. Personally, I believe we spend money on far less valuable things without blinking an eye so making the decision to "buy" a meditation class seems smart.

I'll give ya that, for certain.

Personally, I believe we spend money on far less valuable things without blinking an eye so making the decision to "buy" a meditation class seems smart.

 

This is, overall, a good point.  I will concede it.  

 

"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi

Self-Centered? Gag me with a Lingam!

Lemme say that I totally agree with the concepts- when explained by you- of this self sustaining meditation movement in individuality. I have been of a similar spiritual persuasion for the last few years now- it's very mystery oriented/feminine/left eye of horus-like-can't-be-repeated meditation that I think is amazing and truly enlightening when someone has some basic foundation.

And let me also say- that the name "Self-Centered" as a spiritual movement actually makes me cringe. I swear to God-him-her-it they could have come up with a better name that didn't seem to outright advertise the actual self-centeredness of many yuppie yogi types who have proven to me their real self-centeredness in ways that have literally made me stop attending mainstream yoga studios with a wounded spirit. I am TOTALLY turned off by the name and wonder how on Earth they could have thought it was a good idea to call a spirital movement "Self-Centered." Really appalling. At the same time- it seems the ummm... new age might be finally coughing up its own shadow which may be a move in the positive direction. Love does start by loving the self first, and meditation can help with realizing the oneness of all of us, thereby helping us to extend that self-love out towards others. But siriusly- whoever named this awesome movement "Self-Centered" should never be the guy in charge of naming Crayola crayons.