Techno-Optimism: An Interview with Jason Silva

Jason Silva is a dynamic "performance philosopher" and techno-optimist who is spreading exciting visions of future possibilities for society and consciousness. His eclectic scientific-philosophical-literary discourse remixes the likes of Buckminster Fuller, Marshall McLuhan, Joseph Cambell, Ray Kurzweil, Thomas Kuhn, Pierre Tielhard de Chardin, Carl Sagan, and Timothy Leary into equal parts non-fiction and poetry.
In a recent talk at Lucid NYC, Jason Silva remarked:"I want to broaden the appeal of these ideas because I'm interested in awe, and I'm interested in how to transmute and communicate awe. I've always been curious about this idea of inspiration and whether it's a haphazard phenomenon -- you know, if you can't really plan for it -- but I believe you can actually engineer inspiration. I believe you can perform a -- what Steve Silberman calls a "metacognitive hack" of the human operating system. And what I'm trying to do now is create content that elicits awe. I'm a big fan of Carl Sagan and Timothy Leary and Buckminster Fuller, who came to refer to themselves as performing philosophers: they'd take intergalactic-sized ideas and use the power of media communications to spread those ideas."
I love this mission of "engineering inspiration." It made me think of Jane McGonigal's book Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. A "visionary game designer" with a PhD in performance studies, McGonigal says we can use the techniques developed in game design to maximize our individual and collective potentials in reality. She argues that computer and video games are currently fulfilling genuine human needs that the real world is unable to satisfy -- like having a heroic purpose, a sense of community, feelings of exhilaration, and creative accomplishments: "Game developers know better than anyone else how to inspire extreme effort and reward hard work. They know how to facilitate cooperation and collaboration at previously unimaginable scales. And they are continuously innovating new ways to motivate players to stick with harder challenges, for longer, and in much bigger groups. These crucial twenty-first-century skills can help all of us find new ways to make a deep and lasting impact on the world around us."
One of the ways that games inspire motivation is by providing what McGonigal calls "epic contexts" for individual actions: "[E]pic contexts for action [are] collective stories that help us connect our individual gameplay to a much bigger mission. " They inspire awe, which "in the form of chills, goose bumps, or choking up serves as a kind of emotional radar for detecting meaningful activity. Whenever we feel awe, we know we've found a potential source of meaning. We've discovered a real opportunity to be of service, to band together, to contribute to a larger cause...a call to collective action."
This is one way to articulate what Jason Silva is doing: providing an epic context for thinking about the nature of reality and our roles in it. Rather than seeing ourselves as fluke developments in an unconscious universe hurtling on a rock through empty space to self-destruction, he's helping to propagate a vision of the universe that invokes excitement and inklings of as-yet-unimagined possibilities. It seems that, in turn, this sort of context might inspire otherwise disenchanted and disenfranchised people -- latent visionaries -- to believe in themselves and their power to manifest ideas into reality. His narratives give people an excuse to dream audaciously.
And dreaming audaciously is a powerful thing in itself, regardless of whether we're hurtling towards an inevitable technological singularity. Matthew Watkins reports a conversation with Terence McKenna: "he claimed…that even if [his Timewave Theory] had no basis in truth, it was still worth propagating. His reasoning was thus: if enough people expect some kind of major global transformation in 2012, this will shape their actions in such a way that makes such a transformation more likely!" It's possible that epic contexts like these provide the necessary cultural platform for instantiating such constructs in reality. They provide a perspective that enables the conception of epic projects: collaborative efforts to tell stories and accomplish missions at extreme scales. An excuse to collaborate: "Epic environments inspire us to undertake epic projects, because they are a tangible demonstration of what is humanly possible when we all work together. Indeed, they expand our notion of what is humanly possible."
I recently talked to Jason about his most recent work and his plans for the future.
Neşe Lisa Şenol: Can you say a bit about how you got here? What were your aspirations when you were younger? Why did you decide to major in film and philosophy? Has philosophy always interested you? What are some of the earliest books (& films) that stoked your bliss?
I grew up in Venezuela and went to University in the States where I majored in film and philosophy. My last year of school, I submitted a short documentary to what was to become "Current TV," the cable network co-founded by Al Gore. My film explored the intersection of hedonism and transcendence, and struck a nerve with some of the staff at the network. Subsequently, my collaborator on the project and I both got offered full time positions to be anchors on the network.
I've always loved "philosophizing" and basking in big ideas -- and Current offered the opportunity to wax philosophical about our rapidly changing world and examine the social and technological trends defining our time.
After four years on the network, I've decided to focus on some other creative projects exploring the co-evolution of humans and technology -- a subject matter that has taken a hold of me. Being a committed techno-optimist and wonderjunkie, I'm endlessly fascinated by mankind's dazzling technological abilities -- an ability to actualize and instantiate our dreams in the "meatspace." As the Imaginary Foundation states, "we conjure up delightful future possibilities, pick the most delightful ones and pull the present forward to meet them!" Those guys get it.
I have been very influenced by Ray Kurzweil's Singularity is Near, as well as the writings of Timothy Leary, Steven Johnson, Matt Ridley, Kevin Kelly and others.
How influenced were you by Marshall McLuhan and media studies?
I think McLuhan's interview in Playboy is magnificent. I read it constantly and am struck by the lucidity of his thinking! He was so ahead of his time and he totally gets it. I love the section where he compares technology and psychedelic drugs and draws the parallels between them. It's similar to when Leary called computers "the LSD of the '90s." Technology and psychedelics can both expand our sphere of possibilities; they can both make us privy to realities outside our baseline perceptions. They're also in a self-amplifying feedback loop, whereby psychedelics have influenced our thinking, which in turn influenced the externalization of our thinking, which we refer to as our "technological artifacts." What is technology if not a "scaffolding, extending our thought, reach and vision?"
Who inspires you?
So many people. There are some passages in Kevin Kelly's What Technology Wants that read like rapturous poetry. I adore Carl Sagan. I love Timothy Leary's erudition. Alain De Botton is a joy to read. Ray Kurzweil -- a genius! I love Stephen Johnson. Chris Anderson from TED is an inspiration. McLuhan is poetry and awe.
What precipitated the transition from Current TV to your current projects?
In spite of my creative freedom, Current TV entailed me being a quasi-journalist, and I was itching to take more poetic license in my work. Journalism can be too literal for my taste, and fails to capture deeper aspects of the human condition. As Werner Herzog said, "If facts were the most interesting thing, then the phonebook would be the world's most interesting book." I describe my work now as equal parts ecstatic poetry and non-fiction content -- a kind of "performance philosophy."
You said (in your Reason.tv interview) that you haven't tried strong psychedelics, and yet you articulately argue for their epistemological significance and advocate for their use in appropriate sets and settings. Can you explain the background to this in more detail?
David Pearce wrote in The Hedonistic Imperative that "today one can't responsibly advocate the use of psychedelics because the risk of a bad trip is too great." Sam Harris wrote something similar: he said that while psychedelics were responsible for some of the most earth-shattering, ecstatic moments of his life, the bad trips he had were profoundly terrifying -- so much so that he would hesitate before completely advocating for their use. I'm interested in the development of "designer psychedelics" that can be adjusted to eliminate the risk of a bad trip.
Having said that, I have used marijuana as a creative catalyst for years and find it an invaluable tool. "It's divine for associations," as Norman Mailer said. Carl Sagan, another hero of mine, seemed to get a lot out of it as well. What I like about marijuana is that with low to medium doses, it's a functional tool. It can expand your mind, lead you to wonderful places and spaces, and wear off in time for dinner. It fits inside of one's busy life. I'm sure skydiving is a wonderful thrill, probably one of the greatest that exists, but I haven't done it -- why? Because I'm terrified of the parachute not opening!
Do you have any thoughts about DMT?
I'm sure for some it is beyond transformational and ecstatic. For some people, one session can easily lead to greater psychic readjustments than years of conventional therapy. And yet -- I'm not sure everyone is ready for total ego-death.
What kind of reception have you received for your work?
Chris Anderson from TED called my "Beginning of Infinity" video "stunning," which was a treat! I showed my work at The Economist Ideas Festival, which was so awesome! My work has been featured in Wired, Smart Planet and Forbes among others. It's a thrill.
What are some of your longer-term goals?
I'm working with an Oscar-nominated producer to raise financing for a feature documentary. I'd also love to take my short videos to the next level -- at the moment they are PSA's ["public service announcements"] to infect you with awe! Imagine what I could do with a sponsor! They seem to really be resonating. I want to do many more! I like giving people "downloads." It's fun to use an audio/visual medium to "epiphanize" people.
Do you often find yourself talking about the ideas you promote in your "off time"?
This is my life. It's what I think and breathe and talk about all the time. Those videos all came from unscripted moments of ecstasy. I get in the zone and the words come out. It's like tuning in. I suppose I am afflicted with neophilia -- the desire for novelty.
How do you spend an average day (as if there were such a thing)?
My mornings involve caffeine and computer use. I exercise. I plan situations and unfoldings. I trust serendipity, but I cultivate its precursors. I plan for transcendent moments.
How did you end up going to the DLD [Digital - Life - Design] conference?
I was lucky enough to be asked to speak. I'm thrilled. WIRED UK called it the "hottest conference in Europe." It will be a wonderful place to share some awe. The Edge Foundation has a wondeful logline, I try to live by it: "to arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, gather the world's most interesting minds, put them together in a room, and have them ask each other the questions they've been asking themselves!"
Do you have any suggestions for people who get revved up by your ideas and videos? What do they do with all that awe and excitement?
Hopefully the videos elicit "euphoric curiosity" and an eagerness to learn more. I want people to catch a buzz off my work, and also to feel like good things are happening. Awe is quite energizing, it fuels us in a way that material rewards just don't. I'd suggest that people take that feeling and sit with it, let it marinate and then influence how they see the world.
How often do you encounter resistance or skepticism towards your ideas? How do you react to it?
I've spoken at several public events, and most of the time people are inspired and energized. Occasionally people disagree, but I'm pretty good at defending the ideas.
Have you ever been to Burning Man? Do you have any thoughts about it?
I haven't been to Burning Man, but I need to go -- I'm well aware! I think it sounds astonishing. Radical self-expression.
How much time do you spend reading, generally? Are you a fast reader?
I read a lot, every day. I also read in pieces, and many things at once. I return to things, I put them down, I transcribe passages that move me, and create notes on what I'm reading. It's fuel for the hyper-priming and free-association that comes later.
When did you first get into the notion of "performance philosophy"?
In high school I hosted "salons" in my house on Friday nights inspired by Charles Baudelaire's "hashish house," where a carefully selected group of friends would join me for intellectual explorations. We used to film the most inspired moments! Without really giving it a name at the time, I suppose those were evenings of performing philosophy. I first read the term in an article by Rene Daalder, from SpaceCollective.org, who used it to refer to Bucky Fuller and Timothy Leary. It just clicked. Once you give something a name, it becomes real.
What did you think of the DLD conference?
DLD was amazing! I met Freeman Dyson! He watched my talk, which was incredible! I also met Esther Dyson and George Dyson, and I had dinner with John Brockman, the founder of the EDGE Foundation. It's always such a treat to be around such minds, the serendipity engines go into hyperdrive. "Our thoughts shape our spaces and our spaces return the favors," says Steven Johnson. Spaces like DLD really lead to wonderful conceptual collisions.
Have your own questions? Head to one of Jason's upcoming talks:
- March 27 - The Googleplex, Mountainview, CA
- March 28 - The Economist's Ideas Economy: Imagination, Berkeley, CA
- March 30 - PSFK Conference, New York, NY
- April 2 - The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- April 20 - The National Arts Club, New York, NY
THE BEGINNING OF INFINITY
TO UNDERSTAND IS TO PERCEIVE PATTERNS
IMAGINATION
IMAGINATION from Jason Silva on Vimeo
website: http://www.jasonsilva.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jasonlsilva
twitter: http://twitter.com/jason_silva
vimeo: http://vimeo.com/jasonsilva
Recent Press:
Tweet
- 3-6-12
- Neşe Devenot's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Reality check
RE: Awe
I LOVE awe. I think awe IS reality. But to keep this on Jason's ball court of cinema, as they said in Darren Aronofsky's brilliant film The Fountain, "Death is the road to awe." And in this light his refusal of death is patently absurd.
Michael Garfield..:: Art - Music - Writing ::..
"Imagination is our greatest natural resource."
in agreement
Navel gazing?
After I read this uncritical comment in Şenol's introduction, I knew the interview would disappoint:
"[Jane McGonigal] argues that computer and video games are currently fulfilling genuine human needs that the real world is unable to satisfy -- like having a heroic purpose, a sense of community, feelings of exhilaration, and creative accomplishments."
Seriously? Video games fulfill the need for a sense of community? They fulfill the need for creative accomplishments? Only in a society that no longer understands the very notion of "commonwealth" could solitary game playing (even if it is a network of solitary game players) be seen as a means for providing "a sense of community." Only in a society of passive consumers could playing a game that someone else designed and made be seen as "creative accomplishment."
If we want a "heroic purpose," then perhaps instead of questing after a sense of "awe" that comes from solitary experiences, psychedelic or otherwise, we should return to that maligned "real world" and get to know other people in order to create the reality (rather than just the sense) of community we so crave. If we want a feeling of exhilaration, we can discover the bliss that comes from serving one another; we could help teach an illiterate adult to read, play basketball with kids in a Little Brother/Sister program, or get involved with other people in ways that draw us out of the shells of our own self-concern. If we want a feeling of creative accomplishment, then create and accomplish! Learn a new language, bake bread, start a garden, paint a picture, brew beer, do a cartwheel, master a new yoga pose, etc. Don't confuse getting the high score on Kirby's Epic Yarn with actually accomplishing something.
Honestly, this sort of techno-psychedelic navel gazing is one of the contributing factors to my re-assessment of Timothy Leary (that and the fact that he was an FBI informant). I remember watching a video of him explaining rapturously that, instead of having to see scenes of horror from war zones across the planet, we now have the ability to change the channel (!!). What solipsistic horse shit, I thought (and still think). Instead of dealing with real consequences of our thoughts and actions in the "real world," Dr. Leary seemed to think the solution was simply to eat the digital lotus and bliss out, man. Ain't nothing radical or imaginative about "out of sight, out of mind."
Methinks Silva needs to take a dose of LSD, experience a bad trip, and finally grok that "awe" is only worth a darn if it is grounded in the recognition of the suffering(s) that pervades our world. For now, he seems (as others have noted) one more cheerleader for the self-absorbed obliviousness that is wrecking the only biosphere we have.
We Only See the Technology Allowed to Be Seen
One has to also remember, as a side point, that since the very begining of the industrial age there has been very little true progressive understanding of technological prowess and it's associated ideology outside of the highly subjective interests of the money-manipulative game of investment cartels.
It is just hard to imagine where we would all consciously be at if from Tesla onwards all creative acheivements were treated as of equal value for progressive humanity, as we only see the progress that was allowed to slip through the filters of the powers that be.
So, so many trends of today could have been easily by-passed and/or transcended as science and spirtuality advanced together. Including all of the more moral and ethical ideologies associated with any true progressive notion .... so, so many creative options were snuffed out on the way ...
We are obviously no where even close to where we could have been without the forever self-motivated human elements of control and greed ... the actual directions taken up by the general populace are only those that have been spoon fed to us by those of short-sighted ill content.
Investors, grants $$$ ... stock options ... the whole creative game was highjacked along time ago ... we only see the profitable versions of centralized invested interests .. que sara sara ...
"Wonder is what Mystery would do if it was conscious" ...
"Wandering is for every other possibility"
Pippalayana Muni
En el futuro
It's like he's overclocking
well said
I Respectfully Disagree
In case you missed my comment above (as is so easy to do on this site):
I LOVE awe. I think awe IS reality. But to keep this on Jason's ball court of cinema, as they said in Darren Aronofsky's brilliant film The Fountain, "Death is the road to awe." And in this light his refusal of death is patently absurd.
Jason isn't just a courageous misaligned victim of the system he's heroically penetrated with rare wit and depth. He drank the Kool Aid and is now the cheerleader of a very dangerous set of memes that denies life by denying death, that refuses to see the transhuman intelligence in which we are already embedded, that prefers its narrow cerebral musings to a fully-integrated wisdom. He's building a pyramid on its point and then inviting us all to live beneath it.
Anyone so obviously motivated by avoidance of fully half of the human experience he's so desperate to transcend is an unwitting apologist for the banal evil and has to be given the scrutiny and criticism he deserves.
Michael Garfield..:: Art - Music - Writing ::..
"Imagination is our greatest natural resource."
x
Event Report-Jason Silva & Daniel Pinchbeck Approach Singularity
We headed to the recent Jason Silva & Daniel Pinchbeck Evolver event to see where science and spirit collide.
Here's what we found--- Silva: Materially Inspired. Pinchbeck: Skeptically Spirited.
Jason Silva and Daniel Pinchbeck Approach Singularity
www.Cultie.com
Twitter- @CultieMagazine
Facebook