Introducing Shmushkin
Andras Jones
See below for links to the video and MP3 of "Punkin Lovin'"!
[The New Masculine] • Andy Shmushkin is the guy who sings the songs that accompany my occasional posts about new masculinity on Reality Sandwich. He’s kind of my muse, sort of my brother, possibly my nemesis, and definitely an inspiration to me. I want to introduce him to you.
Little Andy had an auspicious beginning. He was born with a moustache, and a hard on. His mother was a Buddhist monk in the mountains of Northern Canada. His father was Canada’s most beloved alcoholic in the 70’s (no small honor.) Shmushkin grew up between the monastery and the barstool.
A kid with a moustache gets lots of attention. Some of it good, and some of it great. The women of the taverns took to him and the men all got a kick out of his father and his mannish son. Everyone looked after the kid, as much as they could through the bottom of a whiskey glass, and Shmushkin had lots of sexual adventures at a very young age. His tales of youthful encounters are epic.
Between excursions with his besotted father he would return to his mother at the monastery on the outskirts of Banff. There the monks treated Shmushkin like a child of destiny. The strict austere love of the monks trained Shmushkin to “hone his twinkle”, as he puts it. He grew solid and flexible under their guidance, and confident. Very confident.
I met Shmushkin when I was living in a trailer outside of Andy Dick’s place in Los Angeles back in ‘03. Shmushkin liked the songs I was writing with Dick and the ones that Andy turned down ended up in Shmushkin’s repertoire.
How did Shmushkin go from being a moustached boy in northern Canada to a couch-surfing folk singer in turn of the century Los Angeles? That’s really a tale for him to tell. He’s always saying that he’d like to tell it in “the world’s first pornographic children’s film.” He insists that he doesn’t mean child pornography but it’s a fine point and one that I’m not sure a major distributor would understand.
When I met him, Shmushkin had just stopped working for Barely Legal magazine as a chaperone for Barely Legal girls. We were both at one of those “boring” Hollywood events that make a great story later. Andy Dick was chasing after every cute boy or girl he could get his hands on, which can be a particularly nightmarish brand of entertainment especially when even Andy’s not enjoying it. Amidst these madcap hijinks Shmushkin had a pleasant amused air that made it easy to be around him. It drew people to him and Andy Dick, sensing someone with more natural charisma than he had, was no exception. When he heard that Shmushkin needed a place to stay he told him he could live in my trailer. I reminded Andy that he had two trailers so Shmushkin got the second one and we became neighbors.
Shmushkin had to start going by his surname because there was only room for one Andy in the Dick compound. He got a kick out of telling people to call him Shmushkin because, according to him, the name means pussy in the slang of the shtetle that his father’s family was run off of back in the old country.
Shmushkin and I would hang out swapping tunes and smoking pot. Turns out he was a fan of the records I made with my band The Previous. This kind of blew me away. People who knew my band’s music were rare and fans were even rarer. When I heard him sing my songs I couldn’t believe how much better they sounded. Without all my righteous anger and desperation to be understood I could actually hear them. Shmushkin almost never raises his voice and his subtle versions of the songs I had penned put my own bellicose performances to shame.
For the last several years his job as a chaperone for Barely Legal girls had been a deeply fulfilling experience for him, but not in the way that many men might assume. Accompanying eighteen and nineteen year old girls to photo shoots to assure their safety and honor gave him a sense of purpose, and it offered a challenge that inspired him. He referred to himself during this period as a “samurai eunuch.” His office was paid for by Hustler Inc. as part of an out-of-court settlement in a series of sexual harassment lawsuits. Shmushkin was good at his job. The girls liked and trusted him. He said that being a kid with a moustache was kinda like being a porn star but never explained what he meant by it. The girls seemed to understand.
The one time he faltered as a chaperone was just before I met him. There was this girl named Helen Hellion and he fell hard for her. The love affair caused him to resign in shame. Not only did he break his rule of chaperone celibacy but he did so with a girl who wasn’t even “legal.” Hellion, it turned out, was only sixteen and faked her age to make the money for a trip to Paris to study fashion and cocaine. Hellion was a smart cookie. Very well-read. Way too young for me, or for him, but it didn’t matter to Shmushkin. It wasn’t about age. Hellion was old enough to enjoy Shmushkin’s gentle love and he knew it. The shame for Shmushkin was in his failure to live by his own code. He had promised himself to contain his sexual energy with the young women in his charge and he had let himself down. This seemed to be a turning point in his life, an existential crisis from which he would soon emerge as the charismatic character that almost took Hollywood by storm that season.
It only took a few weeks of Shmushkin and me playing music together before Andy D was falling out of love with Shmushkin. He hated Shmushkin’s versions of the songs. He hated the songs. When Andy turned a song down he expected it to be the end of it. It still drives him crazy that Shmushkin is singing my song "Punkin Lovin’" on Andy’s live CD, Do Your Shows Always Suck?
Before Andy banished Shmushkin, first from his heart, and then from his Airstream trailer, he took him to an event at The Knitting Factory in Hollywood. He invited Shmushkin onstage to play "Punkin Lovin’" to prove what a crappy song it was and people loved it. Some executives from National Lampoon were in the audience that night and invited Shmushkin in for a meeting. The following day Shmushkin borrowed my guitar and went down to the corporate offices. When he came back he had an invitation to have his (our) stuff on the National Lampoon website. Shmushkin said he was excited because he was a hug fan of Caddyshack and I reminded him that Caddyshack wasn’t officially a National Lampoon production, but he pointed out that since it used enough former National Lampoon talent (stars, Bill Murray, Chevy Chase, and writer, Doug Kenney) it qualified. I couldn’t argue, and I was excited too.
We needed to record "Punkin Lovin’"and quick. So I called my friend Willie Wisely and we got Shmushkin into the studio. Meanwhile, we got to work on the video (featuring Lisa Jenio of the cult-pop band Candypants) and in under a month we were ready to deliver a song and a video in time for Halloween. Before we could get it to National Lampoon the song (which I had snuck into a package that Andy’s manager was sending to KROQ) ended up getting primetime airplay. KROQ devoted an hour to the song and its topic of pumpkin fucking on one of their morning shows. All of a sudden it seemed like all anyone in LA could talk about was pumpkin fucking and this mysterious character named Shmushkin. He had that energy around him that people who are on the verge of becoming famous sometimes have. It was fun to be around.
What does all this have to do with the emerging new masculine archetype? It’s difficult to put my finger on it, exactly. Like some harbinger of personal apocalypse, Shmushkin’s appearance on the scene coincided with major changes in my own life. These were not comfortable changes and they demanded a new kind of thinking and a new way of being just to stay emotionally alive. I noticed that many of the men of my generation were encountering similar soul-testings during this millennial shift. What they didn’t have, and I did, was Shmushkin. And that made all the difference. He was the trickster that led me off the path and into the thicket where I would discover my power, but first we had to meet and contend with the Anti-Shmushkinites.
To be continued…
See Shmushkin’s video for "Punkin Lovin’" here: http://www.nationallampoon.com
And to listen to "Punkin Lovin'," click the MP3 link below:
- Andras Jones's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Shmushkin - Punkin Lovin'.mp3 | 1.54 MB |




Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
There's a new masculine archetype?!
Shmushkin Video
Here's Shmuskin's Punkin' Lovin' video on You Tube. It's a little low-brow, but Shmuskin seems just as charming as I pictured him with one smooth voice.
How Low Brow?
Low brow? Really?
I guess we're all low-brow behind closed doors. (C'mon, who hasn't "fucked a pumpkin" a few times in their life?) The thing about Shmushkin is that he puts it out there for all to see, and he does it so gently and so sweetly that he pulls it off.
The new masculine reclaims the old masculine without being nearly so oppressive about it, and that's Shmushkin's style. If you are going to be a male feminist you have to love women, and loving women involves learning from them. One of the lessons Shmushkin learned from women is that the feminine loves him. Mother love. Sister love. Carnal love. Universal love. He honors the feminine by loving himself. That's about the most revolutionary thing a man can do today; to truly love himself. Shmushkin does, which is why he always gets the girl (and let's her go.)
By the way, I'm the one who wrote Punkin Lovin'. Don't blame Shmushkin for the content. The song is based on a story a friend told me that made me think about the sexual astrangement that was going on in my marriage at the time. What I love about Shmushkin's version over mine is how much more compassionate he is to the narrator than I would have been.
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
The video, not the song
New Masculine Archetype ???
I enjoy a good time with a gal like any guy…however, “Shmuskin” or better known as YOUR alter ego is just a little over the top. Having sex with a minor and bragging that Hellion, it turned out, was only sixteen “Way too young for me, or for him, but it didn’t matter to Shmushkin. It wasn’t about age. Hellion was old enough to enjoy Shmushkin’s gentle love and he knew it.” That is just plain wrong!!! If that guy touched my 16 year old daughter I would make sure he was in jail.
Also, you are so smug about promoting child pornography in a round about way. You quote” That’s really a tale for him to tell. He’s always saying that he’d like to tell it in “the world’s first pornographic children’s film.” He insists that he doesn’t mean child pornography but it’s a fine point and one that I’m not sure a major distributor would understand.”
Is this the “new masculine archetype” you are promoting ? I am appalled that this web site let you post such smut. You need to see a psychiatrist buddy, before the police department locks you up if you ever decide to act on your fantasies.
I am very concerned about your obsessions and desire to make such statements as to encourage that kind of perversion among the masses. I wonder what your Mother would think if she read what you wrote? Shame Shame. Grow Up little man.
shame on shame
This is very close to the rhetoric the Anti-Shmushkinites used to use when they rallied outside of Shmushkin’s shows. I never heard them say that he was or wasn’t “new masculine” but maybe that’s just a sign of the times.
Men seem to have a harder time understanding Shmushkin than women do. I think that is, in part, because of our own sexual self-hatred. We have been taught by first and second-wave feminism that we are basically rapist beasts. We have been told that our sexuality must be vigilantly guarded for the good of society and, while it is true that we must be sexually responsible citizens, the frightened sex-negativity suggested by your post leaves little room for pleasure, exploration or maturation. In fact, it could be argued that sexual hyper-reactivity leads to the very kind of violent shadow sexuality that we all want to avoid.
Yes, Shmushkin fell in love with a sixteen year old porn model who was lying about her age, but is that really such a big deal? It certainly isn’t the more original or interesting part of that story. What I find intriguing is that Shmushkin worked for several years as a chaperone for literally hundreds of young ladies like Hellion at Barely Legal and in all that time was a stolid guard against their mis-treatment or abuse. I am confident that your sixteen year-old daughter would be safe around Shmushkin. I would like to suggest that at sixteen she is probably having sexual thoughts and might be exploring her sexuality with a partner soon if she hasn’t already started. You could learn a lesson from Shmushkin about relaxing and having a sense of humor in the face of feminine desire. In the end, your fear of your daughter’s sexuality might be more damaging to her than whatever missteps or mistakes she makes on the way to womanhood.
I’m not going to get into the child pornography thing except to say that Shmushkin had a very sexually active youth and that if he were to try and make it into a movie it would involve his character having sex from the age of twelve or thirteen (an age when most men are discovering the games that can be played with their cocks in the privacy of their shame-filled bedrooms) with older women and girls his own age. It is a great story but one which I am not sure that American cinema is ready for. This is not an argument for child pornography so much as a testament to the existence of child sexuality, which is probably a much more frightening concept.
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
Yes, we are part of the REALITY sandwich too!
We live in a civilized society where people are supposed to respect basic human rights of others. Exploiting a child of only 16 years old for your sexual pleasure is NOT acceptable in our society.
In your story you clearly state: Hellion, it turned out, was only sixteen “Way too young for me, or for him, but it didn’t matter to Shmushkin. It wasn’t about age.
Trying to double talk and say she was a porn model to excuse this statement is nonsense, and you know it deep in your heart.
Are you so obsessed with your obsession with sex that you cannot or rather will not see this truth?
Yes, children do explore their bodies. However it is not acceptable for an adult man to help them out in that area. Curiosity is a good thing on the part of a human being, however there are boundaries that should NOT be crossed.
Talk to a child who was molested sometime. See the pain and confusion in their eyes. Not everyone sees things your way Mr. Jones.
Your little comment about He’s always saying that he’d like to tell it in “the world’s first pornographic children’s film.” Doesn’t come across as a child exploring his/her body, but some lewd sex acts preformed by children for your pleasure, hence the use of the word “pornographic”.
You can double talk all you want…but understand…we are all LISTENING…and we are NOT stupid!
Wake up and get a grip on reality. Yes, we are part of the reality sandwich too!
the bad and the bold
Who is the "we" that you feel the need to defend here? I want all people and points of view to feel welcome in this forum. Do you think that your bold and chastising posts create a welcoming environment? Thet read as kind of threatening to me. Is the "we" to which you refer some gang of prudish vigilantes?
It seems clear that you would rather believe your own dark and sordid imaginings than listen to anything I might have to say on the subject of Shmushkin. I suggest that you find your local Anti-Shmushkinite chapter and join up. There you will find many angry (and frightened) men with whom you can share your indignation.
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
Why do you think child pornography is ok?
Hi, I just was surfing the web and came upon this web site. I am 19 years old and not quite worldly yet but at least I know the difference between right and wrong when it comes to peoples rights. It seemed like that lady was not saying she didn't like the character , but that she didn't agree with the topics.
Yes, you are a very talented writer. You have the right to express yourself. If you want to wear a wig and mustache and pretend to be someone else that's cool. I really liked your pumpkin video : )
Anyway, I can see what those other people were saying about child pornography, but I was wondering why you think child pornography is ok?
Wig? Moustache?
Please don't get confused. Shmushkin is Shmushkin. I am not. Sometimes I wish I was. If I were Shmushkin my life would be so much different.
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
Why is Child pornography ok?
I understand what you are saying about the wig & moustache...but what I was curious about was why you think child pornography is ok?
Did anyone actually read this piece?!
There's a lot of panties in a bunch here, people! What gives? First off, this piece is SATIRICAL HUMOR, not a treatise on the rights of child pornographers as a few people have taken it.
There is no advocacy and no defense of child pornography here--just a silly fable about a sexually precocious young man and his adventures.
Mr. Jones isn't supporting kiddie porn--he's simply daring to say that sexual exploration among young kids might be ok in the right context and that consensual sex between an adult man and a 16 year old woman might also be a positive experience, despite what our arbitrary laws dictate.
Where these readers have inferred malice, I see tongue-in-cheek cultural criticism and intelligent tricksterism.
As a sexually empowered feminist, I know that the only way to further my liberation is to also work for the liberation of men and men's sexuality. Part of that work is making space for male voices and male perspectives--even when they are as seemingly bizarre, sweet, and strange as this.
For intelligent writing about the complex and often misunderstood issues surrounding child sexuality, I recommend "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex" by Judith Levine http://www.powells.com/biblio/61-9780816640065-0
A rose by any other name is still a rose
I am 19 years old and not quite worldly yet but at least I know the difference between right and wrong when it comes to peoples rights. You must agree the topics referenced were questionable topics. I think this forum is a place for people to express their opinions…including people who do NOT agree with a liberal viewpoint that supports adult sex with 16 year old girls & promoting a view that child pornography is ok.
I asked the author of this story why he thought child pornography was OK and he still has not answered me. I wonder why?
You seem very outspoken in your views. Tell me , do you have a young daughter? How would you feel if some horny older man seduced your young teen daughter? How would you feel if that older guy not only seduced her but also filmed it and put it out there for the world to see? Definitely something to soul search don’t ya think.
It is possible that others may not be as liberal as you and would definately see it for how it is presented, contrary to some fancy term to make the questionable subject matter somehow ok.
Peace,
Jarrod
Pornographic Obsession Childish
Jarrod,
I never said that I thought child pornography is OK. The piece doesn't say that child pornography is OK.
Why are you obesessed with child pornography?
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
RE: fdsklfjsdklfjsklfjk
I am sorry to have offended you or Jarrod. Quite frankly, you make absolutely no sense to me. What is your request?
Please do not send harassing e-mail to me at my home address. If you are going to be abusive please do so on Reality Sandwich where it might be entertaining. I am open to any discussion but please keep it pleasant. Otherwise I will be forced to ignore you entirely.
Andras Jones
The Radio8Ball Show
www.radio8ball.com
From: Jeremiah Wheeler [mailto:wheelyj26@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 4:07 PM
To: andrasjones@radio8ball.com
Subject: fdsklfjsdklfjsklfjk
Ur the one obesessed with child pornography. Jarrod is calling it like he sees it.
--------------------------------------------------------Seriously folks. Please keep the conversation here on-the-site and on-topic. This is a forum for the discussion of the new masculine archetype. I am not in favor of any non-consensual sex, beyond that I am not ready to condemn anything.
I will let Shmushkin speak for himself.
Presently Yours,
Andras Jones
www.myspace.com/radio8ball
I never wrote to your personal email address dude. Waz up?
I read your story. The story line is about a older, horney guy having sex with a teenager and you made a statement about making a child pornography film in your story.
I was just curious why you would think it's ok? You wouldn't have said it unless on some level you thought it was cool.
Look, I am just expressing my opinion and asking an honest question about what you said. No need to be defensive.
By the way, I have no idea who you are man. I never wrote to your personal email address, just this forum.
Are you trying to confuse people because you don't want to take responsibility for the subject matter?
Peace,
Jarrod
I didn't write the story..you did. I just asked a question
I read your story. The story line is about a older, horney guy having sex with a teenager and you made a statement about making a child pornography film in your story.
I was just curious why you would think it's ok? You wouldn't have said it unless on some level you thought it was cool.
Look, I am just expressing my opinion and asking an honest question about what you said. No need to be defensive.
By the way, I have no idea who you are man. I never wrote to your personal email address, just this forum.
Are you trying to confuse people because you don't want to take responsibility for the subject matter?
Peace,
Jarrod
Nosism
Consensual sex
LOLinated
wtf do all thiz has 2 do wit emergin new masculine archetype??! it difficult 2 put my finga on it… exactli.
like sum harbinga uv personal apocalypse… shmushkin appearance on scene coincided wit major changez in my own life. these wuz not comfortable changez n they demanded new kind uv thinkin n new way uv bein just 2 stay emotionalli aliv.
i noticed that many uv men uv my generation wuz encounterin similar soul-testing durin thiz milennial shift. wtf they didn’t has… n i did… wuz shmushkin.
n that made all difference. he wuz tricksta that led me off path n in2 thicket where i would discova my powa… but first we had 2 meet n contend wit anti-shmushkinitez.
YA MON!
my mama used 2 tickle my wili in bath whan i wuz 3 year old. she must has been pedophile… as i didn't consent 2 it… but it wuz fun in tickli kind uv way.
did anyone actualli read thiz piece??!!!??!!