Internet Kill Switch Engaged

A bill that grants the President the power to kill the internet is to be re-introduced in the U.S. Senate. Ironically, renewed interest in restricting the internet came on the same day Egyptians faced an internet blackout in an attempt to stop the massive demonstrations in the country. The bill is spearheaded by Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican ranking member on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Collins said the purpose of the bill would be to stop cyper threats before they cause damage and it “would not give the president the same power Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak is exercising to quell dissent”.
However, it isn’t clear how the government would know when a cyber attack was being carried out, or why the private sector would need the government's help to protect itself.
A Homeland Security committee aid said that the bill “does not mandate the shuttering of the entire internet” but would allow the President to order shutting off access to “critical infrastructure.”
The ACLU, the American Library Association, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, and about two dozen other concerned groups banded together to write an open letter against the idea.
The open letter stated, “It is imperative that cyber-security legislation not erode our rights,” The groups share the concern that this potential law could be used to censor the internet.
A congressional white paper on the proposal says the government is prohibited from targeting websites for censorship “based solely on activities protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.” But critics point out that this is “exactly the same language in the Patriot Act used to test whether the government can wiretap or investigate a person based on their political beliefs or statements.”
Image by Mike Licht on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing
Tweet- 2-9-11
- Caitlin McGrory's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Cyber-Warfare Defence
On the other hand, cyber-warfare is very real, and the ability to defend in the event of cyber-warfare is important. If people are against the Internet kill switch, I'd like to hear them answer how to defend against attack.
Put another way: Suppose a SkyNet situation were occurring -- an electronic intelligence had evolved and was seeking to gain control? Wouldn't you like to know that someone could turn it off?
And on the other other hand...
They always start as a
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINI
evict the government
Other means of communication...
FOLKS!!
Internet Kill Switch Blog
False flag attacks
If the US wanted to flip this switch all it would have to do is create a threat to cybersecurity (which I'm sure it has already done), infect this viral threat into key infrastructure resources with enough effect to make 51% of Americans demand that the Internet be turned off. The only real question is, who will America blame?
This, and other scenarios are already in the play book just waiting for the go-ahead. When a dirty bomb is finally detonated in a large American city, in order to give the US government the justification it needs to declare marshall law, who's government will be blamed for having manufactured it? I'm sure that Homeland Security is leaving the bomb casing blank for now.
How many Americans is America willing to kill in order to ensure the survival of its richest 1%? Although the answer may shock you, the number is probably in the millions.
freedoms
The Truth
Kill Freedom of Speech
I recognize with you
I recognize with you but as well I would rather have that "someone who can convert it off" not be associated with an organization that has a popularity for significant self-preservation of energy at any price.
Web Applications Development
i only agree if it would stop meltdown of power station