Support our Kickstarter

Internet Kill Switch Engaged

killswitch.jpg

A bill that grants the President the power to kill the internet is to be re-introduced in the U.S. Senate. Ironically, renewed interest in restricting the internet came on the same day Egyptians faced an internet blackout in an attempt to stop the massive demonstrations in the country.  The bill is spearheaded by Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican ranking member on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Collins said the purpose of the bill would be to stop cyper threats before they cause damage and it “would not give the president the same power Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak is exercising to quell dissent”.

However, it isn’t clear how the government would know when a cyber attack was being carried out, or why the private sector would need the government's help to protect itself.

A Homeland Security committee aid said that the bill “does not mandate the shuttering of the entire internet” but would allow the President to order shutting off access to “critical infrastructure.”

The ACLU, the American Library Association, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, and about two dozen other concerned groups banded together to write an open letter against the idea.

The open letter stated, “It is imperative that cyber-security legislation not erode our rights,” The groups share the concern that this potential law could be used to censor the internet.

A congressional white paper on the proposal says the government is prohibited from targeting websites for censorship “based solely on activities protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.”  But critics point out that this is “exactly the same language in the Patriot Act used to test whether the government can wiretap or investigate a person based on their political beliefs or statements.”

 

Image by Mike Licht on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing

Comments

Cyber-Warfare Defence

On the other hand, cyber-warfare is very real, and the ability to defend in the event of cyber-warfare is important. If people are against the Internet kill switch, I'd like to hear them answer how to defend against attack.

Put another way: Suppose a SkyNet situation were occurring -- an electronic intelligence had evolved and was seeking to gain control? Wouldn't you like to know that someone could turn it off?

And on the other other hand...

I agree with you but at the same time I would rather have that "someone who can turn it off" not be affiliated with an agency that has a reputation for rabid self-preservation of power at any cost.

They always start as a

They always start as a beneficial idea, but the potential for abuse is easy, and generally to follow.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINI

evict the government

evict the government

Other means of communication...

would still be available in case of out of control government tyranny...hmmmm...

FOLKS!!

There's a website out there that's really making waves and getting things to happen! DEMAND PROGRESS, largely through the use of Facebook, collected 55,000 signatures against the Patriot Act...which actually had an effect! Here's something on their site right now: Fight Internet 'Kill Switch' Are our leaders better than Egypt's? Across the globe, governments know that the Internet is increasingly the lifeblood of democracy -- that's why Egypt's oppressive regime just shut down the Internet there. But even as American politicians condemn Egypt for doing so, they're pushing legislation to give our government the power to do the exact same thing here at home! The so-called 'Kill Switch' would let the president turn off our Internet -- without a court even having to approve the decision. Join over 40,000 in fighting it. Add your name! http://demandprogress.org/campaigns

Internet Kill Switch Blog

http://internetkillswitch.blogspot.com/ for continuing analysis of Egypt and US legislation.

False flag attacks

      If the US wanted to flip this switch all it would have to do is create a threat to cybersecurity (which I'm sure it has already done), infect this viral threat into key infrastructure resources with enough effect to make 51% of Americans demand that the Internet be turned off. The only real question is, who will America blame?

      This, and other scenarios are already in the play book just waiting for the go-ahead. When a dirty bomb is finally detonated in a large American city, in order to give the US government the justification it needs to declare marshall law, who's government will be blamed for having manufactured it? I'm sure that Homeland Security is leaving the bomb casing blank for now.

      How many Americans is America willing to kill in order to ensure the survival of its richest 1%? Although the answer may shock you, the number is probably in the millions.

freedoms

We should protect the freedoms we have, they are hard won but easily lost if we are not vigilant. The president does not need this power, internet service providers et al have more knowledge and expertise than the federal government in protecting their systems, they know when and how to throw their own kill switch if needed. It is no coincidence that this is put forward as people power stands up for their rights in places where they have little rights as it is. Governments all over the world, democratic or otherwise have looked nervously at what is occurring. Politicians don't like people power, its too unpredictable and not easily controlled and that gives them all the heebie jeebies. write to your state leaders and request a no vote

The Truth

Shuting down the internet is the the opposite of protection.It's a tactic .In Today's world the internet is the only source of nonobjective news we can rely on.Why would the government really want to shut down the internet,Any one who thinks a cyber attack could cripple our defense system is foolish.Do you really think that our defenses are linked to the same network as the world wide web.If that were true then our defenses would deserve to be breached.This is a classic maneuver.Propose some bogus threat scare the hell out of you and wait for you to scream please save us from this terrible threat.If something were to go down you would want the internet up and running to the last.The internet is bigger than anything in the world now. It means a connection to one another like never before in history.The classic powers that be are threatened and scared of that.God forbid we wouldn't need them anymore.This is the land of the free the home of the BRAVE.Lets stand up and act like it.

Kill Freedom of Speech

The Internet kil switch is why we very much need the AlterNet, a collection of privately held satellites, wire systems and radio frequencies that can keep communications going when Big Bubba decides we've all had just too much damn freedom. Every power regime comes up with reasons why they should have the power to restrict human freedoms. let's show them just how wrong-headed and worng-hearted they really are.

I recognize with you

I recognize with you but as well I would rather have that "someone who can convert it off" not be associated with an organization that has a popularity for significant self-preservation of energy at any price.

Web Applications Development

i only agree if it would stop meltdown of power station

i can see them shutting down the internet http://www.webspawner.com/users/accessinternett1/ if some group was trying to meltdown a power plant. not sure if i agree on any other reason and i know they should not be abl to shut down internet access for political reasons at all.