Indiana Jones Meets the Mayans

The highly anticipated release of the new Indiana Jones film is almost here. Masses of people are downloading the teaser on the official film website.
Following in the tradition of the spiritual themes of the first three films in the series, this Indy adventure features the quest for Mayan crystal skulls.
The apocalyptic crystal skulls are thought to be imbued with powers given to the Mayans from an alien civilization, and Indiana is on a quest to capture them before they fall into the wrong hands.
This Mayan twist should be juicy. Also, Indy's old love interest from Raiders, Karen Allen, is back, as well as a new sidekick, Shia LaBeouf (Transformers). Indy's new adult male counterpart is played by bad-ass Ray Winstone, and the evil protagonist is played by Cate Blanchett.
Tweet
- 2-26-08
- Adam Elenbaas's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
the ruins
Twisting
apocalypto
Flawed Depiction
I followed the press on the movie after "Apocalypto" was released and I found some archaelogists and anthropologists specializing in ancient mesoamerica spoke out against the film and revealed its many inaccuracies, among them that Gibson conflated aspects of Aztec sacrifice with his depiction of the Mayans. Other errors dealing with characterization of Mayan culture and the timeframe amount to a movie that a fairly gross distortion of the historical record.
interesting
Wise Old Man
I love the older, grizzlier, grumpier Indy. He's perfect for the Wise Old Man archetype, and I'm sure Spielberg and Lucas gave that some thought considering they were good friends with the late Joseph Campbell. It's good to have my childhood hero back.
~ www.dailygrail.com ~
Linkage
I'm referencing one article in particular, but here is a site I found recently that consolidates both criticism and support in one place.
Maya experts can't agree to disagree
In the 1800s, people believed that the Maya lived in a peaceful utopia, free of violence. When murals depicting bloody fights and gruesome sacrifices were discovered, no one believed the archaeologists and it was quite a controversy.
It's no different to today really, many Maya experts argue and bicker and disagree with each others' theories and opinions, and no one can agree on what happened to the Maya. I have a few academic books with very different versions of Maya history. Gibson's Apocalypto might not be historically accurate in parts, but it's accurate in others, and the Maya expert he consulted has a good reputation (and more importantly, he realised that it was a dramatic film and didn't mind the truth being bent a little to service the story).
The critics forget it's a movie, not a documentary. Gibson's an auteur with his themes of Catholicism, and he took a lot of dramatic license with the narrative to express that. But I think most people recognise that Apocalypto is just a dramatisation with heavy Catholic themes, and is not a historical documentary, so the critics needn't worry. And to Gibson's credit, he filmed Apocalypto entirely on location in southern Mexico, entirely in the Maya language! He deserves credit for that.
Mastodon