Inception: Your Mind is the Scene of the Crime

inceptionbig.jpg 

In the green old days, before the now-compulsory, web-based confession apparatus sucked out everybody's brain, if you wanted to be in a band, you put an ad in the classified section of the hippest rag in your area -- something along the lines of: "Guitarist seeks originals band. Influences: Böwie meets Mötörhead meets Yökö."

Hollywood script pitches still go that way. The Inception pitch was "James Bond meets Orpheus meets Kurt Vonnegut," I just know it. Short version (as I told my local wine pharaoh as I exited his storefront): it's James Bond for hippies.

There's a parallel with last season's Avatar. If you are into plant medicines, you're up for whatever Hollywood budgets can do for that because, well, you're interested in the topic, and a billion dollars' worth of mainstream attention just might figure in the revolution of consciousness. It's exciting. It gives us something to bounce off of. Inception is to the dreamwork what Avatar is to the ayawork. 

A well-made movie on lucid dreaming is indeed a cool and welcome thing. That it has to be formally -- of course of course -- shoot-em-up-bang-bang is to be tolerated. No, wait a sec, that's not good enough; it is to be understood.

To begin with, Inception is a replay of the Orpheus myth.  Beautiful. Excellent choice.

Orpheus was the father of songs, the first poet. His father was a Thracian river god and his mother was the muse Calliope, patroness of heroic poetry, and so of Homer. The lyre was invented by Hermes, but Orpheus perfected it. Sort of like Les Paul and Jimi Hendrix. Orpheus had such excellent chops that when he sat in the forest to practice a tune, the trees and rocks moved closer, the better to listen. His songs changed the course of rivers, that sort of thing.

If you have top-five status in the Greek pantheon of heroes, you get to visit the underworld and come back alive. Resurrection owes a lot to Orpheus. 

The name Orpheus has been traced to the proto-Indo-European orbhao, "to be deprived," orbh, "to put asunder, separate," and the Greek orphe, "darkness," and orphanos, "fatherless, orphan."

The most famous story in which Orpheus figures, and the one upon which Inception is based, involves Orpheus's bride Euridice. While walking in tall grass during their wedding party, Euridice steps into a nest of poisonous snakes. Gone.

The widower's lament made the gods weep. So Orpheus called in a favor and the rulers of the death world, Hades and Persephone, told Orpheus that he could go and find Euridice in the underworld and lead her back to life above ground on the condition that he should not look back at her until they reached the life world. All along the way she called to him. Look at me, look at me, o my love. He couldn't not respond; he turned to look and she was gone forever. This is Inception, the Greek part.

Leonardo diCaprio's Mr. Cobb leads a team of industrial espionage agents who are able to enter people's (CEOs') dreams in order to steal their secrets. Cobb and his bride had done a lot of the dream research that made these missions possible, and had spent so much time in the dream world together that they took the process of dream building to a depth and complexity that no one else in the business thought possible. We meet Mrs. Cobb early in the film, in Cobb's dreams it turns out, but only later do we learn that Mrs. Cobb is dead. Their whole interaction, for two hours, is basically Orpheus and Euridice in the underworld.

Wait a minute. I have a minor beef here. Leonardo's (Mr. Cobb's) wife Mal is crazy beautiful, and beautifully played by Marion Cotillard. But in the mouths of Leonardo and his frat buddies (outside of the main love interest, the whole thing is a frat party weekend with one girl present -- somebody's kid sister, so the guys behave themselves) "Mal" comes out sounding a lot like "Mom."

Leonardo, like any youngish white American male, shouldn't have to deal with such a troublesome name.  These guys grow up with a mouthful of marbles. When they speak, final consonants are anybody's guess. We shouldn't have to try to decode this when talking about the sub-basement of the psyche. They should have called that lovely woman Beth or Suze or Jen. Moh[l/m] is too much. Especially so since there is so little feminine presence here. The main, archetypal conflict, upon which the plot to steal secrets turns, is a father-son relationship. The moviemakers left mother out of it entirely, so the "Mom" reference kind of messes with your mind.

The other Greek element is the "kid sister" I referred to in the parenthesis above. She is a brilliant student of architecture (brilliantly played by Ellen Page) who is hired to design the dreams the team will impose upon their victim. Her name is Ariadne.

In Greek mythology, Ariadne is the daughter of King Minos of Crete. Minos is very upset with the Athenians because they killed his son, so he demands periodic sacrifices of young men and women from Athens. They are brought to Crete and sent into a labyrinth occupied by the Minotaur, who kills them. The young hero Theseus joins the party of sacrificial youths with the object of killing the Minotaur. Ariadne falls for him, and gives him a sword and, crucially, a ball of thread so he can trace his way back out of the maze. Inception's Ariadne serves the same function -- she leads our hero out of the labyrinth of dream. Her audition for joining the team of dream agents is to design a maze.

The Kurt Vonnegut part is from Slaughterhouse Five. Vonnegut's hero, Billy Pilgrim, is "unstuck in time." Due to his having been kidnapped by aliens from the planet Tralfamador -- aliens who move between past present and future with the speed of thought -- Billy is sometimes a teen-aged American soldier in a Nazi prison camp, sometimes an old man remembering his life, and sometimes a young man mating with a Playboy model named Montana Wildhack, a fellow abductee with whom he is supposed to make babies for the Tralfamadorian zoo trade. This "unstuck" device serves Inception's movie dream collage "subconscious" well.

The James Bond part is in the action sequences, and in the trombones. I mean, it's wall-to-wall music, it's BIG music, a la Henry Mancini. There's one sequence of a battle on skis which, if you came across it while channel surfing, you would swear was from Dr. No or Goldfinger.

So what's the overall message? It's that your dreams and fantasies are commercials for the corporation. Forget the collective unconscious, this is the capitalist unconscious. The corporation is reality, get it? So whatever field of struggle you may choose to go into as an activist, it's already accounted for, already a part of the program. The bad guy is the corporation, and the good guy is the corporation, and when the good guy wins, after you have blown up a lot of people on his behalf, the winner is ... the corporation. And you then get to retire to Connecticut, where your Dad, Michael Caine, has been watching out for you all along. Holy shit, Batman, what a relief. Let's go get that Yale MBA and consider that my settling into the elite is, after all, a victory for everyman.

One other thing, my friend Huffa says Inception is about the derivatives trade and the collapse of the financial markets. You can see it when the biggest city in the universe crumbles during the culminating dream of the movie.

Go see this one, it rocks, but keep your eyes open.

Comments

naked emperors

thanks for the insightful mythological breakdown. this helps with me appreciate the underworld theme more, which was kind of weak -- I mean, you have 50 years with your wife in limbo/bardo and you build a bunch of skyscrapers? really? overtime, we forget we're in a maze. that's the danger - -the paradigm is invisible.

Really?

Your review of this movie couldn't sound more snooty, IMHO. The whole "mom" concept you mention is more than a HUGE stretch. I've seen the movie with several people, no one came close to that idea. Your article comes of as pompous. "The corporation is reality, get it?" I hardly think this is the 'overall message.' Maybe that's what you got out of it--fine--but, maybe you're not quite the authority on the matter that your article suggests. Personally, I think the film had more to do with the idea of living in different realms and the current one being experienced always seeming like the real true realm. To me it was the unknown realness of our reality.

Really

I appreciate your feedback. I don't claim any authority. Maybe you are an authority on authority? I'll take your word for it. I don't know what IMHO means.

The "snooty pompous" thing is a real hazard with any kind of cultural criticism. Outside the academy, talking about power dynamics and the larger social implications of artworks is often met with the accusation of snobbishness. It's hard to know how to do the work without being called names.

One possible solution is to bring humor to it, but that backfires too with some readers -- see "sarcastic" elsewhere in these comments.

Without being sarcastic or trying to be funny, my angle would be that any cultural product is an expression of the larger political economic structure that produced it. The individual product is a microcosmic expression of the values behind the money that birthed it.

This film, like so many others, says that normal human interaction is largely violent and intrusive. Why? Because our economy and politics are violent and intrusive. It's not a "conspiracy," it's a spontaneous expression of the values of the people who have the money and power to produce this kind of entertainment vehicle, and by extension, an expression of the larger culture in which such people are major players.  

You are right about the theme of questioning reality, but that's barely half the story. It's great to appreciate that, but I don't think we can afford to leave it at that level anymore.

The film is a corporate product, an expression of corporate culture. It's fine to take cultural products at face value, but we also have to look at the kinds of relationships and larger conditions that produce them.

That's what I was trying to get at. It's hard to know how to express this without upsetting someone. But the feedback forum is good for that reason. When a writer puts something up in this forum, he/she is inviting criticism. The critical discussion is what makes this vehicle important well beyond any entertainment value. Thank very much for jumping in.

Review pharaoh: Your

Review pharaoh: Your critique sounds snooty and pompus because its a fundimental aspect of your writing style, not because you're some misunderstood literary freedom fighter. Put yourself in check if you don't want to come off that way. IMHO means "in my humble opinion", so it's understandable you didn't know.

There's a difference between

There's a difference between claiming authority and and connoting it in tone. I have no problem with your article; I enjoyed it and made a recommendation thereof during the short time i. But though comment to which I write this reply seems graceful and no more authoritative, it does seem to focus much on perceived authority.

"This film, like so many others, says that normal human interaction is largely violent and intrusive. Why? Because our economy and politics are violent and intrusive. It's not a "conspiracy," it's a spontaneous expression of the values of the people who have the money and power to produce this kind of entertainment vehicle, and by extension, an expression of the larger culture in which such people are major players."

While I don't mean to preach to a choir member, that quote evokes an excessively 'negative' receptivity-based or masochistic point of view-- that we are more a product of often forceful influences than our own will that modeled them. Despite the entrenched aggression of some such figureheads, forged ideals and unfair trade, they are ultimately extreme reflections of our darker qualities, both positive(ly ignorant) provision and negative complacency. And by 'positive provision' I mean energetic actualization of our more ignorant motives and intrusive manners on which the corporate model expounds-- hidden or manifest. We're all guilty of everything, as the subtitle 'Your Mind is the Scene of the Crime' might suggest. I do agree that the corporate monopoly and particularly its mind-manipulation (via tv film etc.) seem to get worse. But so do some of us. Our minds are the scene of their invasive crime, our receptive one, and the original inspiration for both we all bear. As Pinchbeck rendered it aptly in the 'Return...' something like.. 'it took Adam's decision <i>and</i> Eve's complacency'.

I found some of your literary/cultural comparisons a little 'this is as such', though the extended Orpheus allegory is pretty brilliant.

Bravo. To you and the overall spiel.

 

Inception is a decent film, and a better mainstream springboard into other spheres of understanding-- which I hope those 'less conscious' will make of it.

 

Namaste

 

as above, so below;

strive to glow

^^regarding the comment now

^^regarding the comment now above mine, i think we can all figure out whether some RS users haven't had or at least haven't often had an entheogenically catalyzed ego death. or an ego death period

 

as above, so below;

strive to glow

Aww naled!

You got me. I totally wrote the above comment from wounded animal mode. And the way you were able to subtly point it out without overtly being a dick...priceless.

Color me circumspectly scolded.

And as hypocritical as it sounds coming from one who's house is obviously not in order, don't you feel a little bit cool for pointing out to the rest of the class how unenlightened my rascally little ego was acting?

And what's with the little suggestion below the Tetragram paraphrase in your sig?

And what if enlightenment turns out to be more analogous with weight (lightheartedness) than emanation?

Either way, fun fun fun!

OK

In My Humble Opinion

I think you're taking this movie as a platform to preach your own politcial beliefs.  It's like you're having a separate conversation and trying to tie the movie to it.

You say: "So what's the overall message? It's that your dreams and fantasies are commercials for the corporation." Then you go into a tirade about the pervasive corporate control in our society without connecting that to the film at all.  That's why I think you come of as authoritative.  How can you expect the reader to see your point if you don't offer evidence that relates to the movie?
You use this same technique in your response to me when you say: "This film, like so many others, says that normal human interaction is largely violent and intrusive."  Instead of proving that point with references from the film, you take it as a given that it has already been proven.  Sorry, but I'd like at least one example of that from the movie.  I mean, are you saying the interactions in the dream world were "normal human interactions"?  Hardly.

Regarding my using "snooty pompous"--maybe that's a harsh thing to say, but it comes from an examination of your language.  You use diminishing language such as "frat buddies" and "Let's go get that Yale MBA" for example, which seems petty and baseless.

Peace.

The reality is the trouble

The reality is the trouble that a corporation will go to "beat" another corporation. The military develop advanced technology that super rich corporations buy to use to there advantage as the sheeple sleep. That is the meaning of Inception. Corporations rule. Thanks for the great article.

Yes, really!

Ryan Hurd said: "I mean, you have 50 years with your wife in limbo/bardo and you build a bunch of skyscrapers? really?"

Uh, they were architects? That's what they enjoyed doing. It might not be what you enjoy doing, but it fits their characters.

Indeed, I've found people a

Indeed, I've found people a little harsh in judging such fragments of the movie-- extrapolating from them that certain characters are shallow or unimaginative based on what little we saw of their lives 'off the job.' I don't even see it as 'skyscrapers are all Cobb and Mal built while in Limbo'-- I see it as 'skyscrapers were more or less all we saw in the part/span of Limbo that was exposed'. The movie focuses necessarily on much abstraction, leaving less room for more common aspects of defining characters' lives.

Fitting also that Inception was relased during the western/tropical rule of Cancer, on roughly the first day of its sidereal rule, July 16. Ruled by the moon, ha..

 

as above, so below;

strive to glow

Mmm yeah

Fully agree with the first part. Had a similar thought but it wasn't articulated nearly as well as above. Makes good sense all around.

On point astrology as well. The timing of the release of this "vehicle" was spot on!

cobb

For me the word "cobb" always makes me think of corn, which as most people know is sometimes called "maize" :)

Yes! And...

Maize is yellow and white kernels, hiding behind a green curtain.  Clearly a coded statement on China's rise to dominance, racing against the West to destroy the environment while promising to protect it.

It is amazing how many hidden messages you can find in Inception, when you know where to look. :)

---

http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/

Awoken

Just dreaming of the corporations who are dreaming of their control of over our dreaming

Thought provoking

I found this movie very facinating. But Steven's view of this movie is very sarcastic. Before I saw the movie, the morning news reporters said that they saw it and it was very confusing. Since most news reporters are very robotic, I can see why they wouldn't have understood. Basically, it was a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream. What's there not to understand, the characters explain it before they start the dream sequence. I think the writer of this movie had a great imagination. I loved it however, I couldn't compare it to Greek mythology or James Bond, but for me it was like the Matrix movie. Very thought provoking. Great movie.

Lucid Dreaming

Great article -- I find that the more I focus on and develop the intention to lucid dream, the more I seem to have these experiences. I consistently have out of body experiences, "full-outs" and lucid dreams at night while sleeping. It truly is an amazing spiritual process. Some of my favorite include receiving instruction from entities in the dream state where they show me how to use thoughts to control my astral body - I have had many such dreams. I envision a future where shared dreaming and operation on the astral plane become more and more commonplace...just found a great post here: http://maketheconsciousconnection.com/ on the nature of dreams -- be sure to check it out!! :) Namaste my friends and fellow seekers,

Catalyst

Apparently there is a wave of new oneironauts that have spontaneously been able to wake up in their dreams and control outcomes and go into dreams within dreams as a result of watching the movie Inception!

About to see this movie...

...and your review (didn't read the spoilers, most of it) made me want to see this film even more! Thanks! - Jstarship

Inception key point

key components to the "extraction" team is the "Architect" which, admittedly, is a cool name and a possible nod to the Matrix which I can't help but reference. This particula character is responsible for creating the worlds and sub-worlds which the extractors enter based upon the needs of the job. The world folding scene is part of a Matrix style training session, and I would of loved to seen this explored more.Come Oscar time you can expect numerous nominations to come Inception’s way, particularly in the sound editing, sound and cinematographic categories. by health insurance

Dedicated server hosting

That is very good comment you shared.Thank you so much that for you shared those things with us.I'm wishing you to carry on with your achievements.All the best. dedicated server hosting

Another view

"When you see Inception, pay particular attention to the conversation(s) Leo has with Juno early on in the movie about creation and perception within the dream – particularly the talk he gives using the small circular drawing. Then expand that concept past the sleeping dream. Then take the egoic personality/”individual” needs & wants out of the equation – and see where such inquiry leads you.

One more thing: If the American Beauty bag-dance represents the best cosmic consciousness film sequence to date, then perhaps the single movie image that (analogy-wise) most closely reflects the mystery of Truth Realization might very well have to be the absolute final shot from Inception."

http://justperception.net/nautilus/2010/07/top-keeps-spinning/

 

 

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Revolutionary change

Definitely it is going to bring a revolutionary change as it has also done very well in the developing country where a certain formula movie runs well life insurance nz