Sign Up Now
Login/New User

Psyche

Homo Luminous: The New Human

Alberto Villoldo

 

Many prophesies in the indigenous world speak of this time in human history as a period of great transformation. In the medicine tradition of the Inca, legend tells of a great angel who looked into the future and saw that humanity would face an enormous task at the beginning of the 21st century. Extenuating circumstances in an extremely difficult and challenging time would require extraordinary effort to bring about peace and heal the heart of the world. “Who would like to volunteer?” the angel asked. Knowing we could make a difference, we jumped up and said, “Me!”

The legend reminds brings to mind a scene in The Lord of the Rings when the dwarf says, “No chance of success, certain death ahead? What are we waiting for!” Of course, our odds are better than those faced by the dwarf, but the problems humanity is facing are huge. It is no longer a matter of global warming or carbon emissions, but the possible collapse of the entire climate system – a catastrophe beyond imagination. At the human level, the distribution of water is a huge problem. Who owns the water? Can private interests own the water? And how do we distribute water to places that don’t have it? The problems we face are vast and overwhelming. But the problem the Earth is facing is simple: do away with the parasite affecting it. The Earth has an immune system that recognizes what is toxic and will do what is necessary to eliminate it.

The indigenous peoples have a body of prophesy that says up to two-thirds of humanity will be eradicated in the next decade, between now and 2012. There is to be a tremendous culling of humanity because the earth can no longer sustain this parasite humanity has become. But every crisis brings with it a marvelous opportunity and this is why we stood up and said, “Me!” Our work is to find new solutions, to develop sustainable ecological practices in commerce, business, and medicine. This is what we came to do.

I see the main problem as a spiritual one. Not resource problems, but the problems centered around human beliefs, the troublesome elements founded in our mythology. Our problematic mythology is collapsing all around us. It is a mythology that is predatory, that is abusive, that reaps the cream of the earth – timber, water, topsoil – and passes the furtive costs onto future generations. These greedy, rapacious paradigms that pose humans as a dominator over nature are no longer sustainable.

One day, I was walking with a medicine woman and her husband deep in the Amazon. “Alberto, go across the clearing,” they said. “Go back into the rainforest and see what happens.” So I turned and went back into the forest. From all around me, the forest was full of song. The sounds of the macaws and the monkeys and the parrots from all about were as an orchestra. First step, second step, third step, and then, everything stopped. The shamans came up to me and said, “See? They know that you’ve been kicked out of the garden. They know that you don’t belong here.”

Certain that all of nature could smell my underarm deodorant, my hairspray, my toothpaste, my athlete’s foot powder, I looked around for a way to cover up my scent. By the edge of the river, I came upon a couple of Indians cooking a boa on a spit. I asked them for the fat they had been collecting from the boa. Stripping down to my shorts, I smeared myself with the boa fat, thinking this would conceal my smell. I walked back into the rainforest. First step, the forest was full of song. Second step, the forest was full of song. Third step, and again, everything stopped. Except for the flies, hundreds and hundreds of flies swarmed about me.

It took ten years of study with the indigenous people before I was able to walk through the rainforest and have it continue singing. No longer did the forest recognize me as someone who did not belong. I belonged in the garden again.

This reveals a great deal about our mythology. Mythology creates our beliefs and those beliefs inform our reality. In the west, we have the only mythology on the planet in which we are kicked out of the garden. Nobody else was cast out of the garden. The aborigines were not kicked out, the sub-Saharan Africans were not kicked out, the indigenous Americans were not kicked out. These peoples were given the garden. They were the stewards and caretakers of the garden. We, on the other hand, were not only cast out, but as we were being cast out, a voice said, “And cursed is the earth because of you,” pointing to the woman. And to the man, condemning him to a life of hard work, “With the sweat of your brow you will take your fruit from the earth and the earth shall produce thorns and thistles for you.”

This is the original damnation. The Bible doesn’t say, “And the earth shall grow strawberries and mangoes and papayas for you.” It says thorns and thistles. This is our mythology. From the beginning, we have a hostile relationship with the feminine, with the earth itself. And if we look still deeper, even before we were cast out of the garden, we learned on the seventh day of creation that all of the food on the planet belongs to us. The animals and the trees and the flowers were created for our pleasure and for our feeding as humans. Instead of putting us in a position of stewardship with all life on the planet, it puts us in the position of the consumer. The assumption is that all of the food on the earth belongs to humans. It doesn’t. The food on the earth belongs to all living beings on the earth.

A second element unique to western culture is that we have practically the only mythology on the planet in which the masculine gives birth to the feminine. Eve is made from the rib of Adam. Nowhere else, except in Greek mythology, does this appear. As the ways of the feminine began to be lost, Zeus became the dominant god. In the early Greek mythologies, the goddess, the “creatrix”, was predominant. As she began to be eclipsed by the masculine principle, Zeus became predominant. And though Zeus took the goddess Hera for his bride, she refused to submit to him. Thereafter, she was known in mythology as “the bitch” because you cannot repress the feminine without ill effect. Eventually, it becomes deadly for a culture, and this is what has happened to us.

The paradigms of the west are the paradigms of the masculine. This is at the core of the problem. We have to break free of this mythology that sees the earth as ours to consume and sees the feminine as damned. These mythologies express themselves in our economic, political, social, and educational systems. Even our medical practices are, by their very nature, hostile and aggressive. These paradigms hold that all the food and resources on the planet belong to us. Not to the other animals, not to the plants; it all belongs to us. We can rape, loot and pillage, we can spoil the earth and postpone the price of clean-up to future generations. We have been in the grip of a mythology that has exhausted itself. Our economy, our political system, education, and even our relationship paradigms – all show signs of collapse. The old mythology has taken us as far as it can.

Now we must look for mythologies of sustainability, of collaborative relationships with the earth. This new mythology has yet to emerge, but we have the traditions of the Earth Peoples to provide us with models of the kind of world our children’s children can truly inhabit. The Earth People have an animistic relationship with all of life. Animism is practiced by people who believe they can speak to the rivers and to the trees and to the canyons and to the mountains and to God. This is what we were able to do before we were cast out of the garden. We were still in relationship with Spirit and with the natural world. Spirit is actually talking to us all the time. But we, in the west, don’t open our ears to hear. If we are to find that self that still walks with beauty on the earth, that speaks to the rivers and to the trees and to God, and to whom the rivers and the trees and the voice of spirit talks back, we need a great kind of soul retrieval.

I embarked on my study in shamanism nearly 30 years ago as a result of my frustration with western psychology and my inability to discover the workings of the mind. I spent 25 years, first as a medical anthropologist and psychologist, and then becoming a student of the shamans, immersing myself in the ways of the shaman. I began to study the techniques, methodologies and practices of the earth peoples who have developed a body of knowledge for stepping beyond mind, for living mindfully, but outside the visceral grip of the mind.

My studies led me to South America, to the rainforest, to study with medicine men and women of the Amazon. These traditions had been neglected by anthropologists and by students of religion because they had left no body of writing. Modern prejudice says that if you do not learn to read or write, you are illiterate and therefore, not intelligent. These traditions were dismissed, whereas students of religion and anthropology have been studying the other world traditions, ones that left the Vedas and the Sutras and the Koran and the Bible, for hundreds of years. The indigenous practices of the Americas were neglected because writing is largely absent. Only since Margaret Meade and the advent of experiential anthropology have we begun to discover the true wealth and beauty of the indigenous teachings of our land, of the Americas.

The shaman believes that we live in a benign universe. Evil exists, but only in the human heart. We live in a collaborative, benign universe that will actually go out of its way to conspire on our behalf. But you have to be in proper relationship with it. In the medicine traditions, the shaman sees no difference between being killed by a microbe or killed by a jaguar. To us, one of them is an illness, and one is an accident, “Poor boy, he went to the river at dusk, and got eaten up.” For the shaman, these two are identical. You have to be in proper relationship with microbes and with jaguars, otherwise they both begin to look at you as lunch. When you’re not in proper relationship, the universe turns predatory. It begins to stalk you. When we come out of proper relationship, the universe becomes adversarial – we hit obstacle after obstacle – but when we are in proper relationship, it conspires on our behalf. The most unlikely possibilities line up to make things work for us. This is an essential aspect of the healing process in the medicine way: to come into proper relationship. Not to medicate, to treat, to intervene, but to come into proper relationship through an energetic process.

The shamans of the Americas understand that we have a luminous energy field that surrounds the physical body. It informs the physical body in a way similar to the energy fields of a magnet that organize iron filings on a piece of paper. In the paradigms of the west, we are intent on shuffling and moving the iron filings about, trying to change at the level of the physical. Shamans possess a body of ancient energy healing practices that move and shift at the level of the energetic – moving the magnet – and the physical body follows. The shaman works at the core, at the essential level and healing happens.

The shamans discovered that time runs in figure 8s, that it loops in wormholes back and forth. The way we can know that is by breaking free of the grip time and experiencing infinity. The core healing practice of the medicine way – the illumination process – happens outside time, in infinity. It happens when we access a self that never entered the stream of time, that cannot be affected by disease, that cannot be touched by ill health. Once having made contact with the infinite, we can re-inform who we are today. We can grow bodies that age differently, that heal differently, that die differently.

In times like these we are constantly challenged to face little deaths in our lives: who we once were, a relationship ending, loss of a loved one, a career, a cherished time in our lives. During transitions, we have time to reinvent ourselves. When we don’t, a deadening happens. That deadening causes us to age instead of becoming the sage. If we go through these little deaths consciously, they become opportunities for new life. Instead of being wounded by transitions, we become inspired by them if we have the prerequisite courage. How we respond to adversity turns us into courageous beings. Courage can come out of frustration, illness, from many sources, sparked by adversity or by the divine.

I remember when my daughter was thrown from a horse at age six. The horse stepped on her and ruptured her liver. She was very close to death for three days. I was in the Amazon at the time. It was the longest journey of my life coming back to upstate NY. When I arrived at the hospital, she was in pediatric ICU, hooked up to tubes and IV’s. We didn’t know if she was going to make it. I sat beside her, crying, praying to God that she be saved, when an immense clarity came over me. My sadness disappeared and I spoke to her soul. Although she was unconscious, I said to her, “Sweetheart, I love you, and you have to make a choice if it’s time for you to go or not. It’s your choice. I love you, your soul knows if your journey is done.” Three minutes later, she regained consciousness. She chose yes.

To go from victim to hero we go into the feminine, into the earth, the mother, the great one. There is no way to make a personal journey without embracing the greater journey of the planet. The heroic stories are the stories of accepting that call to the hero’s journey, accepting the calling to a destiny. While we all have a future, only a few have a destiny. A destiny is something you must make yourself available to by saying yes to life, yes to God, yes to your own growth, your own spirit.

The medicine way is as contemporary today as it was 50,000 years ago. My mentor believed that the new shamans, the new caretakers of the earth would come from the west. We are the ones who can bring healing and transformation to our families, to our communities, and to the earth. This is a critical time in history, a time for a reawakening of the earth and of our own feminine. It is a time of tremendous transformation. All our old models are being reinvented, in every facet of society. And we are the change agents. That is what the shaman has always been. The shaman is a map-maker. We need new map-makers. Essential maps do not simply lay out the territory, but are a guide to the territory. So we must make new maps.

The nature of the dialog that the shaman has with nature is one of life speaking to life, life connecting with life, life responding to a call and responding to life, to us. We call on four great archetypes: the serpent; the jaguar; the hummingbird; and the condor, the eagle in the east. These are the four organizing principles in the medicine tradition. They are known by different names among the Hopi, among the Shoshoni, among the Navajo, the Maya and the Inca. The important thing is not what you call it, not whether it’s the jaguar in the west or the buffalo – the important thing is that when you call it, it comes. That is the shaman’s agreement with spirit. Our agreement with spirit, that each and every one of us has made, is that when you call, spirit comes. Not 60% of the time, not 90% of the time, but 100% of the time.

Each of the four archetypes is the embodiment of organizing principles in the universe, described in animistic fashion. Each one of the directions represents one of the steps that the shaman must go through to become a man or woman of knowledge. The shaman differentiates between information and knowledge. Information is what we are flooded in every day. Knowledge is wisdom. Information is knowing that water is two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Knowledge is being able to make it rain.

The shaman is a person of the percept, of perceptual traditions. In the west, we are people of the precept. We get precepts, laws, rules. We get the ten commandments, elect legislators and law makers that make more rules. When the shamans want to change the world, they work at the level of the essential to bring about a shift in perception. By shifting perception, we dream the new world into being and the world changes. That is our task, to dream with our eyes open.

Through this great transformation, a new human is emerging on the earth. I call this new human “homo luminous.” Shamanic traditions understand that evolution happens within generations. In the west, we believe evolution happens in between generations: maybe your children will be smarter and more handsome, maybe the indigo children will climb to the next rung on the evolutionary ladder. The shaman understands that evolution happens within generations. It is for us to take that quantum leap into who we are becoming. We can become homo luminous in our lifetime. This is our greatest task: to take that quantum leap individually because as we do it for ourselves, we do it for the entire planet. Each and every one of us, when we choose truth, when we choose life, when we choose light, we are transforming the world.

 

Image credit: "Doorway to the Spirit World" by maintou2121, under Creative Commons license.

email

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

making rain

call the rain makers,

the ones with knowledge of the aether,

that know the wave as it passes through,

the spirit door, the wisdom is not held by the four legged, they are the wise held by the wisdom,

it is the wise that hold the wisdom,

who step through the spirit door,

with the wisdom of the door, and the door of the wisdom,

these words hold the spirit as they breathe spirit into the words, as the rain needs a cloud,

or the knowledge of aether,

creates it out of thin air, the broken vessel,

the rift that erupted like an rogue volcano,

this split, this human with the two minds,

wandering around in civilizations lost realizations that once were everywhere and nowhere,

now are just nowhere as those who still knew the aether,

through her green Amazon,the only one left from a once atheric tribe

luminous one, like a portal through the woods, lika a human postage stamp that is mailed to the unknown,

what did Heraclitus say? about not attempting to know the unknown? If we do not try?

that river, that same river, not seen the same way twice, yet its the same river coming through the door of water, these

language serpents rivering along that follow to the boa shore, go back through the myth passage, go back and see the ruins that now are there to illuminate your seeing, your being will shine like a flashlight through the undergrowth of old stories, and the pillars of salt, the medusa mirrors, the undergrounds forking down hidden paths,

this is no longer the mystery that jumps up and the all colors of the rainbows macaws that mock your footsteps, this is the silent avenue of sphinxs that go back in time through the perspective zero point, goes back to the first one, that sat like stone, sat in the eternal light of now bathing in the celestial pleroma

the metaphor is like an Machu Picchu window,the lost city of the golden, that uses a geometric image that we would call an angel that opens the imaginary glass pane and lets the new human light through...

and it rains infinity signs.

Picture of <em>LionKimbro</em>

Still working through it, ...

A second element unique to western culture is that we have practically the only mythology on the planet in which the masculine gives birth to the feminine. Eve is made from the rib of Adam. Nowhere else, except in Greek mythology, does this appear.

I'm still working through it, but I know this isn't right-- Izanagi-no-Mikoto gave birth to Amaterasu-Omikami from his left eye.

I don't see this as damning to the page;  I just want to point it out.

Picture of <em>AmethystDreams</em>

I could be wrong...

Will we reach that state of mind while still typing away on a computer? In this day we all talk about alternative energy,ect. But the only problem is that even if we have that option,the technology behind even making those things destroys this living thing called Earth. Just a thought...
Picture of <em>John X</em>

alternative technology

In this day we all talk about alternative energy,ect. But the only problem is that even if we have that option,the technology behind even making those things destroys this living thing called Earth.

 

"Soft" technology, or technology which is "sustainable, flexible, resilient, and benign," will function according to natural tolerances and principles while providing energy for what we need as beings existing in harmony with the planet and universe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_energy_path
Picture of <em>LionKimbro</em>

View of 1 Technologist

As someone who's been working at computers since the age of 6, and sincerely loves computers, spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, even passionately: "no."  We won't be able to reach that state of mind while typing away on computers.

That said, I have faith that we can find ways to account for the manufacture of computers that won't destroy the environment.

Right now, computers are like teenage boys: growing so quickly, they can't help but trip on their own feet.  At some point, the exponential growth of computer technology should peter out, and then stabilize, wishes and dreams of the singularitarians to the contrary: exponentials never last forever.  Right now, by the ITRS, (the very existence of which is the reason Moore's law has continued for solong,) Moore's law is predicted to peter out ~2018-2020.  There will still be advances in computers, but core technologies should be basically standardized and, more importantly, reusable and not immediately obsolete.

Monitors are going extinct, and there is good reason to believe that user interface is going into projectors, cameras, and clothes.

This isn't to say we shouldn't be working on all the other stuff:  I personally think it's crucial to live locally, engage, do political work, while moving to live and work with people communally, grow our own foods and power, and (perhaps most importantly) connect spiritually, through art, creation, interaction with nature, and ritual.  (It feels so crude and analytical to say it that way.)

I just say this all to give a glimpse from the technica side of thing.

hmm moore's law

what about the sequence of numbers that create the geometic dynamic that most scientists look the other way of? well, i guess if it keeps some stealth technology grants coming in and they think they are faking out the aliens.

 

i have a moore's law, it's a little like the law of a philosopher poet i once knew, it consists of a healthy dose of grounded pragmatism, and a expanded view of the parameters of the sequence, or the chaos solution.

Picture of <em>LionKimbro</em>

Oh!..

THAT sequence of numbers, ...!

No, we don't talk about that...

Time to Play Indian? *Yawn*

Some interesting observations, but personally I find all this breathless reverence for indigenous cosmologies and prophecies rather tiresome. Sure there may be something to learn there, but it's all for naught if we can't provide visions native and relevant to a global, hi-tech, densely networked, 21st century civilization.

"But the problem the Earth is facing is simple: do away with the parasite affecting it. The Earth has an immune system that recognizes what is toxic and will do what is necessary to eliminate it."

 Oh, really? So you're speaking for the earth now are you? This kind of toxic misanthropy is entirely useless. The "humans as parasite" metaphor is weak and perverse,  and it reflects in my mind an impoverished view of Nature.

It's interesting to see you criticize the Western mythos but embrace its most spurious assumption: that man and his productions somehow stand apart from the natural world. 

this seems personal

alright, it reminds me of a reaction, to some percieved pet theory, that got somehow spun into some self-reflection, that gets spun over and over, to any percieved transgression, to the pet theory

its reminds me of an object, that gets pushed they way and that, because the byproduct of the internet, and its easy access, and the fact that some person can pretend to be lots of different persons.

like""ITS MOST SPURIOUS ASSUMPTION" what assumption? no evidence given to explain either way, just another spurios assumption, about what has been actually said.

 

and so forth like that, this post it so cliped that it seems like it has been used over snd over, for other communications, no personality at all. just flat statements

with no feeling, bordering on hostility, "breathless reverence for indigenous cosmologies and prophecies"

oh are you..."rather tiresome"? now, oh feigned tired.

oh are we global tech now? are you bored with your self?

oh is all ...for...naught ....i grow suspicious, nay almost superstitious,

 

ah, " if we can't provide visions native and relevant"

relevant? to whom would this be relevant too?

some grown tiersome couch philosopher?

 

please don't yawn too loud, you might give yourself  away.

and then you will have to make another post with a different name. same game, same time, next week. 

Picture of <em>superfly</em>

tRUth?

tRUth?

I think both perspectives are correct.

Vico Mirth, you say that Alberto's claim that humanity is a parasite "reflects in my mind an impoverished view of Nature" and then go on to say that Alberto is wrong for viewing manmade things to be outside of nature. I agree that all things we experience now are natural and am quite fed up with people who say that we live in an unnatural world. Our inventions simply aren't as highly evolved, as well adjusted as nature's, but we are natural, and our inventions come from us, so therefore our inventions are natural. But why can't humanity be a parasite? Parasites exist in nature and can surely be just as damaging as they can be helpful, which seems to suit humanity to a T.

Humans as parasites

Well, parasites are not products of their hosts for one - they are invasive. If we are to be viewed parasitically, than seeing ourseveles as something fetal would be more accurate (not to mention empowering).

 

 

 

Elaborating on this tangent

Perhaps, if we were to truly think that the human/parasite metaphor has any veracity, this idea would go on to support the ancient aliens theory.  That because we came to earth and originally evolved from an external source we could accurately be thought of as parasites.  Or leeches.
Picture of <em>caseymachula</em>

Villoldo's ethics

I'd like to know why the exemplar of homo luminus himself has witch-doctor ethics?

While studying under him at Four Winds, an obvious money-making schtick in spite of its self-consciously created fluffy New Age aura, he told a story of how he helped acquit a man who had injured people by driving intoxicated. How did he do that? He helped select the jury. And how did he do that? He did divinations on people, without their permission.

That's the same as a bruho, a witch-doctor.

Hold onto your car keys when this guy talks, boy.

this sheds light

on the light that has been shed, but it seems to be under a shed.I understand the whole new agey scene becomes a bit well, yuppiefied.I have seen that happen, i have been in that situation, i see the politics played on all sides, the riddles of the game, and the behind the scenes stuff, ala wizard of odds.

but on the other hand if we merely polarize it in equally lame same same old objections, then we really are not seeing the shamanic forest for the witch doctor trees.

and thats the bees knee chi.

oh the moneymaking sthuck!!!

 

 

also

look at the message, because if it gets lost in the static between I and thou, and here and there, then and when, it's like kicking around the Castaneda can around , oh look at the worms? yup, it sure opened up that.... yeah, but are they eating the ouroborus? follow the bouncing yin-yang ball...

it might bounce rough through that cosmos-door 

Picture of <em>doan</em>

Inspiring

Thank you for an inspiring, and personal story that helps people to think about their relationship to the earth and to fellow living beings. I don't know enough about all the techno talk that has spun off these side arguments, but the core of the story to me was touching and meaningful. I believe that nature is a huge being and we are just a tiny part of the whole. Nature, and more specifically, the earth, would do just fine, perhaps better, without us. It is my opinion that we need to work at doing a better job being part of the system, rather than believing we are separate from it. Thanks again for this article.

DoAn

 Interstitial Artist

www.doanart.blogspot.com

Western Creation Myth

I loved this article. The idea that we can reconnect to the energies of our living mother, feminine earth and allow ourselves to transform with her into luminous beings rings of truth in every way. I had another thought, however, about the Judeo-Christian myth of being thrown out of the garden.

Perhaps the myth of the Fall as a reaction to eating the apple in order to be like the gods was in fact a quantum growth for the human consciousness. In the garden we were pampered by a mother and father and told not to question their authority. We were in no effect creators or co-creators with them but only children of play. When we decided to "be like the gods" we proclaimed that we wanted to come into the next step of our higher nature and become creators. As a result, we were thrown out of the protected place of abundance and into the desert of want, where in order to survive we would have to begin the process of individual and societal "creation." We had to figure out in this desert of thorns how to produce food and livlihood, we had to figure out where we fit into nature now as the expected "creators." We have had thousands of years of trial and error, mostly error, but like a growing child are now possibly gaining enough strength through our mistakes to grasp onto what we need in order to "be like the gods." We are discovering that it is not our manipulation of the material world, of our desert, that we can produce "food" but rather through joining the blessed energies of the earth and utilizing the power of our creative minds and wills that we can, in perfect harmony, create "like the gods" a world where none are in want but all live in plenty. We are learning that it is not by making "life" out of the physical desert that we threw ourselves into that we will gain our strenth as creative beings, but by embracing the desert and the abundance of the garden and the energies or gifts therein in conjunction with the creative powers of our own minds and wills that we will create a world infinitely higher and more beautiful than it could be without us and we could be without it.

Perhaps the myth was revealing to us that we didn't need an outside masculine principle or "god" to ignite the feminine earth for our needs but rather that we could become the masculine "god" by aligning ourselves entirely to both the feminine and masculine and producing our own world. We have learned through horrific errors that the only way to do this effectively is to align ourselves, rather than force ourselves upon, the forces of light that ultimately compose both the feminine and the masculine. Thus, in the end we become luminous bodies, or light bearers, co-creating with God, Great Spirit, Universal Intelligence or whatever name you give it, utilizing all energies for higher consciousness and evolved existence for all.

techno talk?

side arguments?

well at least the next post attempted to make some sense out of the mix up with the external male god thing.

i'm not sure what 'be like the gods" means, like which gods? there are so many to chose from, and it seems that the "gods" were too busy trying to not be like us, oh i don't know, the Greek gods were very human like.

not much like that jealous one, well.

 

(oh i figured out what that side comment to the side comment was )

 

Feminine/Masculine Principle

Well, first blush would certainly appear to indicate an imbalance between the masculine and feminine principle. I sometimes have a difficult time remembering that these principles are different than male and female - although they may both manifest the principles. Both principles operate in direct proportion to each other. When the masculine is being expressed, the feminine is encapsulated within it - and vice versa. In essence, both are constantly being expressed. The anima in the warrior and the animus in the mother await our acknowledgement. I envision that Homo Luminous will be able to look at 2/3 of the population disappearing and recognize not death, but rebirth. These are grand times!!!
Picture of <em>MWal</em>

Reconnecting in a modern world

I thought this was an excellent article. After reading it, I did think, however, about how almost backwards it was I was reading about reconnecting our personal spirit back to our mother earth off a computer screen. But this is just the way man has evolved way of life and we can't dwell on how destructively materialistic our world has become and we can't continue to ask ourselves, "Can we reconnect?" because we can. It isn't about technology. I think to change the world and to expand the consciousness of others you have to first begin with yourself. With positive energy comes positive results. The world is changing, but with this change, good or bad, we can evolve with it. We don't have to give in to or even adapt to our modern world, but we can learn to coexist with it. Everything is alive with its' own energy and by radiating your own with positive thoughts and actions, we will coexist with everything around us and that, I think, is returning to our Mother Earth. We can use technology to help us undo the damage we've done to the earth by creating alternative, renewable energy and we can use ourselves to slow down the rest of it. We have to take responsibility for ourselves, our neighbors, and our earth. Keep an open mind and always be aware of what your actions do to the life around you.  Consciousness, I think, is key.  Love and Peace.M

interesting

" consciousness, i think is key"

now imagine a key, any kind of key, dangling on a string in front of your gaze, now watch it move slowly back and forth.

you are getting awake, your eyes are slowly opening, you are now fully conscious, consciousness is key.

ki

 

 

Picture of <em>MWal</em>

Key

Haha Excellent.  I firmly believe it is so.

What mythologies?

Hey there, while I generally agree with the tone and message of this piece I had a few questions about it. In particular as a student of mythology I was wondering what specific myths and indigenous cultures are being referred to in the first few paragraphs of the article. An Incan angel looking into 21st century? I am afraid that specific cultural differences are being lost here in favor of a new-agey feel-good hodgepodge that just rubs me the wrong way. As for christian mythology being the only male-gives-birth mythology... there are many kinds of cosmogonic myths from around the world and it seems that the earliest types were not ones where there was a sexual division between the deities, or even an anthropomorphism of natural forces. Often times mankind had to tear apart the sky and earth in order to survive, and continue to do so.I do agree though that "mythology creates our beliefs and those beliefs inform our reality," but it is important to remember how ingrained those myths we are raised with really are.

therefore

we are now either new agy feel good hodge podge, or we are feel wrong way rubed myth buff nuffers.

i suppose you could substitue the angel for a being that looks like a blade of grass.

notice that i write poetic, and well, i guess that is beyond the new agey feel good hodge podgers and the feel wrong way rubed myth buff nuffers. 

pardon me but what did you

pardon me but what did you say?

well since you did not say much except hogy podgy

i guess i will not bother explaining myself, either
Picture of <em>Rogerscott</em>

Here we go again

If you don't mind: I call BS. Here is another writer taking advantage of the obvious prediliction here of taking recourse to stories about experiences in South American rainforests and first hand experiences with "shamans" and so on. References about "[m]any prophesies in the indigenous world" about "the 21st century" beg for there to at least be some bibliography wherein we can find some reference points that have ANY probity for the thesis here. Does "Reality Sandwhich" mean: take BS, add a layer of half-truth, a layer of saccharine-rich ketchup-writing, some actual reality, more BS, and feed to a gullible, sloppy-thinking public? My guess this writer is referring to Hopi legends (an oral tradition with no reference to "21st century man") or interpretations of Inca/Maya/Aztec or maybe even Hindu lore. Fine. But "Indigenous" lore is prolific and in no way can anyone with even a smattering of knowledge of how much of this exists possibly expect another with some idea about this to believe "many" talk with some specificity about "21st century" changes.

I guess I don't get the thema of this web-site. I'm fine with alternative interpretations of current dogma about what "Jesus" means or meant, or any form of theism or alchemy or anything of this kind or "ilk" of thought. I just don't buy trying to smooch into the minds of others by speculative writing an idea that what is being proposed is some form of fact or "truth".

===========

Letter writing is still the most potent way to raise the consciousness of elected representatives: it's a record they cannot ignore and cannot say they were unawa

um, Roberto Villodo

is a well known published author, that either you find his writing and scene your cup of tea or you just take it with the usual grain of alchemic salt? As far as "truth"how would you know that is "truth" or not, even if this story is presented as a kind of truth telling of some experiences that connect to the types of true retelling of other stories that relate to certain thought and practice of native people, ect.

merely showing that you have a critical method of thinking doesn't show your thoughts are more true then the next, therefore one cultivates a refrence to many points of departure.And from there one can create a picture within many pictures, and so on.

one does not look at a painting by a great artist, or any artist, and stand back and look at it from side to side, and then exclame..."but is it true?" it may or may not be art in your view, but in the artist's view it is art.The truth of that is neither here or there, it is everywhere.

Picture of <em>Rogerscott</em>

Just in case

Okay, I went to the "biography" of the writer of this piece, and found this:

"You can only find truth if you seek it for yourself,/ for the truths of history are the truths of others. But/ truth is like a mirage in the desert./ For us, the task is not to chase truth/ but to create it./ Truth is a stance, an act,/ of power that you bring/ to all your actions./ Truth is what the person of knowledge/ brings to every moment."
Alberto Villoldo, Ph.D

I think this says it all. And his web page tells another "truth": it will cost you the tidy sum of "$10,350", but further costs are entailed in other aspects of "advanced" "curriculum". See:

http://www.thefourwinds.com/curriculum.htm

Again, I call BS. A yuppie culture of "feel-good" psychology and metaphysics that has exactly nothing to do with the power, the real power, of information to empower us to being able to cope with the world and change it it in real ways that has nothing at all to do with "programs" and "books" and vicarious "atonement".

Some people do exist on the internet who have real and powerful information that substantiates everyones' hopes that there is a reality that has been missed. And they write about it FOR FREE, while keeping their day-job or actually WORK for a living. Taking people for a ride and living off of gullibility and attaching real truths to some form of "purchase" is a bad thing. I adhere to the premice that a "worker is worthy of their hire". But this has to do with reciprocal kindnesses and feeding and clothing the poor, not making a living off of the ignorant.

The popular figure of the "light body" is far removed from the actual information that is out there that relates the perverse powers of the mind that we should be working to remove that limit our lives and the power of the body to regenerate. There IS an abundance of evidence that shows that man can transmute external conditions both in terms of biological function and social circumstances. If anyone has any insight as to how to bring the facts of these methods into easy access to everyone, it is their priviledge to talk about it and to give some provenance of their personal path to this knowledge and how others can learn it and apply it too. It is NOT a license to "make a living". How could it be? That would mean the "poorest of the poor" would be automatically excluded. Or what?

Like Hamlet said: "I smell a rat". Or have I misread my De Vere et als. (read: Shakespear)?

Sorry Villaldo, but you asked for it by virtue of your proposition. I call 'em as I see 'em.

===========

Letter writing is still the most potent way to raise the consciousness of elected representatives: it's a record they cannot ignore and cannot say they were unawar

i donno, i guess you think Roberto

is living in luxury, and smirking as we speak, because he sells a book or three, in that logic, every person that sells a book, is merely a "rat" and then there is you.

a perfect saint. oops the rats smell again.

but seriously, again i think you have a personal agenda, that your attacking Roberto, even if he is a bit of a spreader of "new Agy" stuff, and therefore everybody that reads his books and works with his ideas is merely a yuppie new age follower, and then there are their detractors, but do you offer any insights into these realms other then your "the poor people cannot get enlightened by his seminars and book" approach?

 

yeah , like so what, that's his cross to bare, merely pointing out that he bares it, is just the beginning, there is a whole sea of this kind of capitalist new age manifesting wealth stuff.

what else is nu?

 

The cult of the PHD and the well-known published author

....yea,check out if the PHD is genuine too and as for being published and wellknown...so what?....that means something these days?

For a PHD he lacks precision in his writing style and as for the generalisations......pretty sloppy.

chime right in

you can join the detractor line, over.......here,

 

and now, for something completely different.

Nah...

...that's too easy,CJ.

For me, Rogerscott's opinions are pertinent. For too long people have been mesmerised by the fact someone wrote a book or claim to have PHD's to give them an authority they dont deserve.

Can't blame this generation for being considered.I like the elegance of the way they articulate their perceptions.

I think their ability to discriminate is not a negative thing.

opinions?

i don't see anything other then Roberto Bashing, it sounds personal, or like this guy just goes around bashing people, to make himself look good! it sounds like that other Roberto basher, and the other one, they all sound the same, HEY I LOOK GOOD BASHING! no real insights, just an agenda.What do you they have to offer? insights? no, just attempting to show they can sound like they know something nobody else does, hoop de doo! like, SO WHAT!

I really enjoy your comments....

I think this forum would be poorer for your abscence.

sometimes I have to read your posts two or three times to let them in....its like I have to disconnect a more literal,linear mindspace.

but I cant agree with you on this,I don't see an agenda here,just people explaining,very clearly and well,what they don't like about this article and its writer.

 

well i disagree

i don't see any clearity at all, just bashing, that help the situation not at all, what they don't like about the writer is based on what? are we to believe that they are some crusader for purity?

i don theenk zo, otherwise they would have something to offer other then the agenda, of making some just huge point, out of some all over the map, disgruntledness.

i see patterns in the few disgruntled detractors, they seem to think they have to keep banging on the some flat notes, over and over,

 

that dosen't sound good to my ear, i want a real picture painted, not just some buzzing of flies in my ear.

regardless of the fault someone might see, if they can't show another picture that points in a more active imagination direction, then its just a quibble.just more muffleing in the beard.

and Robert still shines, even though they toss crap at him.

Is Robert a friend of yours?

Is Robert a friend of yours?

noop

never read his books.

incedently

even if Roberto is a cynical user of native spiritual teachings, he must at some point really think about these teachings.It's like saying that Castaneda deliberatley set out to abuse native spiritual teachings, and consequently became mad and made a lot of buckolas.

made a lot of buckolas.....

and caused alot of pain too,CJ.

I find that incompatible with love,spirituality.

If more people had thought like these guys Casteneda and his witch enablers would never have got away with what they did to others.

witch enablers

oh jeeze, and i bet they are flying around on broom handles, with that Potter fellow.

could be....

no one knows where they are now.....maybe Dorothy's house landed on 'em.

Zardoz's giant stone head

did.

How the Indians do it

Describing Gordon Wasson's sacred mushroom experience, in the book, Sacred Mushroom of Visions, Edited by Ralph Metzner;

"When Wasson later asked Cayetano what he could pay him for having arranged the velada, the Indian turned to his wife and let her speak: "No hicimos esto por dinero," she said: "We did not do this for money."

(page 87) 

so

the bottom line of this thread is made into the bottom line

 

Picture of <em>Daniel Pinchbeck</em>

Strategies and transitions

 I really appreciate the comments and criticisms presented here, and would like to address the gist of them.

My hope is that RS continues to develop into a forum and think tank where can hold “New Age,” as well as old age, ideas up to careful scrutiny. To do this, I feel that we have to establish ourselves as a place where people and public figures with established reputations and followings will contribute to the ongoing discussion and project. The more that our audience and reputation grows, the more ability we will have to bring analytical criticism to ideas and suppositions that have become common in different strata of the culture. But first, it may be strategic to bring in these figures and make them feel comfortable with what we are doing here.

My view is also that we can adopt a meta-level evolutionary perspective on culture and society. Taking the integral perspective of time (discussed in my last book, and defined by Jean Gebser), we can see different cultural forms and initiatives as transitional, but good and helpful in the transition we need to make. What Villoldo offers to people now is a huge evolutionary leap in authenticity, integrity, and accuracy to Castaneda and his “tensegrity” movement. That is not to say he is perfect or that his motivations are absolutely selfless (who’s are?).

There were several statements in Villoldo’s essay that made me uneasy as well. I found the comment that shamans see the universe as “benevolent” to be a simplification. I am also resistant, on many levels, to putting forth the concept that two-thirds of the planet may croak before the luminous man emerges like a phoenix from the industrial ash heap. There is definitely a Christian construct of guilt, sin, and redemption of the few that sounds as dangerous in a neo-shamanic context as in a Fundamentalist one, to me.

The relationship between making money in our system of global domination and hypocrisy and black magic or sorcery is one that deserves careful attention. We are all embedded in the present order of things. In this culture, wealth is the most overt way that society rewards work that it considers important. Therefore, I would prefer to see it go to people who are at least trying, however imperfectly, to move things in the right direction. I think that people who work hard and produce important cultural advances deserve to be rewarded for those practices. They would also be rewarded in traditional societies, though those rewards would take different forms than they do in our world – and may take different forms again as our concept of value changes and our global economy crumbles.

Villoldo has definitely introduced a huge number of people to shamanic practices. Despite the price of his courses (cheaper than an MBA!), the techniques he teaches seem to have a great deal of validity. Where Castaneda’s Don Juan seems a fake, Villoldo travels with elders from an Incan lineage, and creates the space for them to express their own perspective on shamanism and prophecy. He is a real bridge builder. I became interested in his work because of several friends who truly evolved into being able to do effective shamanic work and energetic clearings through the techniques they learned in his courses. He has also introduced many people to medicine work in the Amazon.

RS does not have the resources to pay writers or fact checkers at this point, which limits the amount of reconstructive work we can do on a piece before it goes live. If a number of you are interested in becoming freelance volunteer fact checkers who do background checks before pieces go up, you can email me and we can discuss this. Personally, i quite like the way the comments have been acting as a critical chorus undermining any faux authority on the part of our authors, but hope you can understand and respect our greater perspective and strategy. 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

Daniel

Are you asking that members be a little less forthright in their criticisms when posting?

One thing I would request is that when a writer puts up PHD or MA after their name that they put the name of the university they studied at so it can be independently verified?

I got a thing for fraudsters who claim fake academic qualifications to give themselves credibility.

 

Picture of <em>Daniel Pinchbeck</em>

being sensitive

I wouldn't want people to restrict their criticisms at all but sometimes they could be stated in a more sensitive way. It is a bit too easy for people to be nasty and dismissive on Internet forums. This can bring the discourse down and chase contributors and potential commentators away, while adding to the larger negativity of the culture.

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

Picture of <em>jezebelle</em>

I don't know but no book,

I don't know but no book, computer, author, drug experience, cleverness, or vitamin will help you expand until you are empty enough to receive it. It don't matter how it comes, as long as it does. Having been in the jungle and in mountains with shamans several times (stop right there, I know nothing and am nobody) I've seen many people miss what was right in front of them. "Did you feel anything" some ask, I'm thinking you have got to be kidding me! "excuse me while I kiss the sky."I kinda think technology and money is a little like god; it depends on how you use it or perceive it. It's US the users who are to blame, it just exists in a state of "is-ness."Plant technology is useful but is a very delicate matter. Personally I relearned a lot of deep, deep usefull stuff that I had forgotten, being old and all, ha, ha, ha.In my core I believe in human imagination (even critical imagination) and it can lead you wherever you want to go. But as an old high-board diver, "where your head is, your body will go." Some truths have to be experienced and go beyond any left brain musings, but words are all we got right now. Being pregnant in the moment will get you farther than being in peru, or a workshop.Yet we all need a good book or adventure to help us out of our perhaps, quandary of aloofness. 

Some things cannot be dissected, try if you will, but you will never get to the heart of it.