Support our Kickstarter

The Gulf Oil Spill as the Unfolding of Prophecy

firewater.jpg

As someone who has written extensively on indigenous prophecies relating to this time, it is hard for me to escape the uneasy presentiment that the massive, ceaseless, devastating cascade of what may be more than 100,000 barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico each day – apparently still mixed with the far more toxic dispersant Corexit that British Petroleum continues to inject, despite EPA objections – is anything but the inception of a new phase in the foretold unfolding of events that may terminate most life on earth, potentially leading to the rapid extinction of the human species. Recent articles reveal that there is a gigantic bubble of methane gas underneath the Gulf of Mexico, which has helped to create the enormous pressure that makes it unlikely, if not impossible, that the Deepwater Horizon oil spill can be stopped by human means. Video taken by undersea robots show oil and gas leaking from many fissures in the earth, far beyond the range of the well hole. This suggests that the underground containment structure is cracking apart. If the current effort to build relief wells fails or is ineffective, there are no more known technological fixes available.

According to  D. K. Matai, writing on The Huffington Post, “The “flow team” of the US Geological Survey estimates that 2,900 cubic feet of natural gas, which primarily contains methane, is being released into the Gulf waters with every barrel of oil.” If the estimates of over 100,000 barrels of oil leaking per day is correct, this means that over 16 billion cubic feet of gas may have been emitted, “making it one of the most vigorous eruptions in modern history,” writes Matai, an engineer and co-founder of The Asymmetric Threats Contingency Alliance. The huge methane deposits beneath the Gulf were well-known as a risk factor for drilling operations, which did not apparently dissuade corporations like British Petroleum from shirking regulatory safeguards in order to drill at the edge of known technology, 5,000 feet under the ocean floor and then 30,000 feet (imagine a distant speck of airplane far above the ground for a comparision) beneath that, into the core of the earth. Methane is a major contributor to global warming, turning into carbon dioxide once released.

What Matai along with other engineers, scientists, and journalists have laid out is a possible scenario where the methane, pushing up with enormous pressure, could lead to a gas explosion: “A methane bubble this large – if able to escape from under the ocean floor through fissures, cracks and fault areas – is likely to cause a gas explosion. With the emerging evidence of fissures, the tacit fear now is this: the methane bubble may rupture the seabed and may then erupt with an explosion within the Gulf of Mexico waters. The bubble is likely to explode upwards propelled by more than 50,000 psi [pounds per square inch] of pressure, bursting through the cracks and fissures of the sea floor, fracturing and rupturing miles of ocean bottom with a single extreme explosion.”

The methane gas explosion would be immediately followed by a series of enormous tsunamis engulfing Florida and the southern coast of the US. At the same time, during the day when this explosion takes place, “several billion barrels of oil and gas” will be released, as freezing water rushes into the enormous cavity, turning immediately into steam. There are many earthquake fault lines running from the Gulf through Mexico and much of the South West of America that might be triggered by a sudden collapse of the ocean floor due to such an event. “Could this be how nature eventually seals the hole created by the Gulf of Mexico oil gusher?” Matai asks. Of course, this is only one scenario, and it is unknown if this will occur, or what the timetable might be.

If such a devastating scenario does not take place, there is still the continuing spill, and the high likelihood that our current known and available technologies will be unable to address it. In this case, we may soon see the Gulf of Mexico area and the Southern coastline rendered uninhabitable. As the Christian Science Monitor has reported in its article, “Raining Oil in Louisiana? Video suggests Gulf oil spill causing crude rain,” there is some evidence that oil is beginning to rain down on inland areas of Louisiana. “Crude oil doesn’t evaporate, but some are speculating that oil mixed with Corexit 9500, the dispersant that BP is using on the ever-growing slick, could take to the air.” As Kerry Kennedy, from the Robert F Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, stated in an interview on CNN,  the average life expectancy of cleanup workers on the Exxon Valdez oil spill was 51 years old. “Almost all those people who did work on the Exxon Valdez are now dead,” she stated. “And BP still here, once again, is big oil not giving the information to the doctors and health care officials.” According to Kennedy, cleanup workers in the Gulf “had been told by BP that the didn’t need respirators. Apparently, they’re concerned about poor media images of people wearing respirators and rubber gloves and starting, quote, ‘hysteria.’”

As widely reported, hurricane season is now upon us. Hurricanes could potentially carry the extremely toxic crude oil mingled with the even more poisonous Corexit hundreds of miles inland, creating either a slow-motion mass murder of the local populations or forcing the government to execute a total evacuation from the area. As the oil travels up the coastline over the next years, coastal cities facing the Atlantic and Pacific may also become uninhabitable “Haz Mat” sites. Caribbean islands such as Cuba and Jamaica will be devastated, as will be the coastline of Mexico.

As I explored in previous works, I am convinced that we are reaching the hinge point of a shift in human consciousness and the earth that will either lead to a rapid transformation of our way of life, our “civilization” and its basic paradigm, or the termination of our species in a series of intensifying cataclysms. One clear reason for this is that our technological powers continue to advance rapidly, while those who are currently in control of these galvanic forces reveal a dangerously reduced consciousness, a lack of forethought based on their self-centered greed, combined with a complete absence of ethical and moral development. As Rolling Stone recently exposed in a great piece of investigative journalism, the bungled handling of the oil spill was preceded by the gutting of the regulatory system that monitored such operations, revealing once again the government’s capitulation to corporate interests. It seems increasingly obvious that, if we wish to survive as a species, the current ruling corporate, political, and financial elite – working seamlessly together to bring about our collective suicide – must be deposed, replaced by a new orchestration of civil society, an openly democratic and truly transparent system, where nothing is hidden, where profit is not the only motivation, and all have a voice.

As the Deepwater Horizon cataclysm spreads gigantic dead zones in the Gulf, exterminating vast ecosystems of marine life, threatening millions of human beings with illness, dislocation, and death, potentially blossoming into an extinction-level event, British Petroleum CEO Tony Hayward continues to display the profound lack of remorse and the blithe disinterest we recall from the tenure of the last Bush to occupy the White House. Recently, he attended a yacht race off the as-of-yet-unsullied English coast, while his public statements include the infamous “I’d like my life back” and the equally extraordinary, “The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean.” Despite extensive scientific documentation of the extreme toxicity of crude oil, Hayward has suggested that “growing health problems among clean-up workers may be related to food poisoning, rather than their exposure to crude oil and dispersants.” Our corporate and financial culture instills a mindset of sociopathic disregard, and the system permits certain psychological profiles to thrive within it: those capable of disassociating their actions from any moral consequences. What should be an extreme liability in a complex and interconnected world shared by a multitude of living beings has become an asset for our corporate, financial, and political masters – the current ruling elite who congregate at events like the annual Bilderberg gathering, who see massive loss of life as “collateral damage” along the way to their next golf game or yachting match. By now, it seems fairly obvious that Barack Obama is one of this breed, indistinct from the rest.

“These deformed individuals lack the capacity for empathy,” writes Chris Hedges in his essay, ‘BP and the Little Eichmanns.’ “They are at once banal and dangerous. They possess the peculiar ability to organize vast, destructive bureaucracies and yet remain blind to the ramifications. … The corporations, and those who run them, consume, pollute, oppress and kill. The little Eichmanns who manage them reside in a parallel universe of staggering wealth, luxury and splendid isolation that rivals that of the closed court of Versailles. The elite, sheltered and enriched, continue to prosper even as the rest of us and the natural world start to die… And our business schools and elite universities churn out tens of thousands of these deaf, dumb and blind systems managers who are endowed with sophisticated skills of management and the incapacity for common sense, compassion or remorse.” Like the bail out of Wall Street, the BP oil spill disaster makes evident – if more evidence was needed – that, in the United States, the corporations and the government have merged into a single power, a destructive force founded on the mindset of Empire, seeking domination of nature through technology, and control of consciousness through incessant indoctrination via the corporate-controlled media. There is zero possibility that our atrophied electoral system will interrupt or impede this juggernaut.

I try to maintain faith that the human spirit will awaken in time to liberate itself from the prison that has been built around it. While my doubts grow, I continue to work for that result – to hope and to pray for it. What seems more likely is that the great churning multitude of humanity will choose to remain distracted, disconnected, pursuing narcissistic aims, vain and virtual pleasures, as the natural world, the generative earth, crumbles around them. On what the Russian mystic G I Gurdjieff called our “ill-fated planet,” most people apparently prefer to die rather than awaken to the situation, think for themselves, and join together in a collective movement to restore the earth and build a sustainable and equitible global society. Many of us can see the awakening happening, but it seems to be coming far too slowly, in hesitant fits and starts, while the destructive force also grows in strength, pumping up the volume on mind control technologies, predatory drones able to assassinate from a distance, data-mining intelligence operations, and all the rest of the sterile evils that our technocrat sociopaths can envision and unleash.

These are aspects of my current view of the world: the faltering of my faith, that horrible presentiment that the forces of disillusion and destruction have already triumphed, that creepy familiar feeling (as if I already experienced this, long ago, on some other lost world, many forgotten splinters of incarnated lifetimes ago) of failure and futility. On another level, I feel an equally uncanny presentiment that all of this is still going perfectly according to plan, that the script of our collective world movie/space oddysey has to unscroll or unfurl in just this stomach-clenching way, toward its still mysterious denouement. Observing my own life, I see that it often takes a drastic crisis to spur me into action – perhaps that is the only way change ever takes place, on the individual or species level.

The environmental and economic meltdown could clear away all the obstacles and obstructions that keep us from attaining clarity, from putting into practice what we know intuitively to be true. Is it possible that the Jungian archetypal Self – the increasingly humanized god-image that seeks to incarnate in our human world – must bring about the complete breakdown of what is known and familiar, to open the space for what can only be revealed, in the fullness – and emptiness – of time? Perhaps we can only reach the depth dimensions of our higher being through an unfolding mega-crash that exposes all levels of delusion and self-deception, that forces those of us who desire illumination to break all the bonds, the “mind-forg’d manacles,” that keep us from attaining liberation. Or perhaps I am only making a hopeful story out of the toxic rubble and radioactive fragments that will soon be all that remains of our ruined world, if the corporate sociopaths and Little Eichmanns have their way.

I consider the geyser in the Gulf to be analagous to the rupturing of the amniotic sac that occurs at the end of  pregnancy. This event presages the birth of the new being, who must be forced by a terrifying and life-threatening crisis to use the organs he or she has developed over the previous months – developed without knowing what purpose they serve or how they function. Like the fetus at the end of the pregnancy, the human race has devoured the stored resources within our mother’s secure womb, the fossil fuels buried deep underground, and now we must learn to survive on new forms of energy, taking the initiative on our own.

Over the course of history, humanity has developed delicate and sensitive organs of consciousness and perception, without truly knowing their eventual meaning or purpose. Unlike other species, we have a tremendous excess of communicative capacity, leading us to make art, write novels, dance, compose symphonies, imagine elaborate inner worlds. How do we know that these seemingly marginal aspects – aspects that seem to have little to do with our survival as a species – are not, in fact, essential to our unfolding evolutionary trajectory? Aboriginals in Australia believe the sacred task of humanity is to “sing the world into being,” communicating with the ancestors in the Dreamtime. Perhaps, through an awakening of our imaginative and psychic faculties, we can restore this primordial communion, and reopen doorways that modern society slammed shut long ago.

Our creative capacities are one legacy of our species’ recent history, a new extension or organ of  consciousness that has developed along with our increasing technical and technological capabilities. Another aspect of our evolution can be found in the world’s esoteric knowledge systems. These systems give us tools for evolving consciousness, for perceiving and interacting with other dimensions of reality. We learn from the traditions of mystery schools that humans are capable of performing marvelous and magical feats that overturn the apparent physical “laws” proposed by science. Up until now, such manifestations have appeared rarely, usually linked to a particular person – books like In Search of the Miraculous or The Autobiography of a Yogi describe many psychic feats of certain masters. In our modern desacralized world, there are also many well-reported accounts of “miracles” – inexplicable psychic phenomena – such as mothers suddenly able to lift 3,000 pound vehicles off of their children after an accident, and so on – acounts of powers that exist in one moment, but afterwards seem to fade into nonexistence.

In the same way that electricity was once inaccessible to us until engineers learned to channel it in the early 19th Century, is it conceivable that these psychic or psycho-physical capacities could become steadily available to people through a disciplined training, once the mechanisms behind them are better understood? I believe that we are currently in transition from the physical to the psychic phase of our evolution as a species. In order to manifest this, we would need to develop a shared realization that such a shift is possible. This requires an open dialogue on the legitimacy of psychic phenomena and synchronicity, building a foundation for general acceptance of the powers and potencies contained within the psyche. I am compelled by Rupert Sheldrake’s theories around “morphic resonance” and the “morphogenetic field” that forms when sudden inspirations and breakthroughs become habits and patterns, creating what scientists mistakenly call “laws.” Those who have broken through to a new level of understanding need to create the template, strengthen the morphogenetic field, before the larger population can comprehend what is happening, and make a transition.

It is now agonizingly obvious that humans do not change their ways until they are far outside of their comfort zone. It is only at the point of death that transmutation becomes possible. Perhaps the rampant desecration of the physical world is going to force the more conscious subset of humanity to purify their intentions, clearing cobwebs from the shadowy corners of the psyche, to access extrasensory capacities on a regular basis. Many of us have experiences of this energy, this potential, but the manifestations tend to occur at uncontrollable junctures and in mysterious ways. In my own life, I have found that psychically charged events occur at certain highly charged junctures, which seem to reveal the working of a synchronic order, as if some form of superconsciousness, when magnetized by the energy of intention, can ripple through the underpinnings of our 3-D reality, causing changes that seem beyond the parameters of what we generally accept as possible. Can we learn to access these capacities on a regular basis, like the dependable current we get from electricity? If we can come into alignment with this superconscious shaping force, we may be able to begin to heal the wounds of Gaia, to stop tormenting the generative earth that shelters us and gives us life. I think it is quite possible that even the course of seemingly unstoppable biospheric and geophysical events, like climate change or the oil spill, could be altered through collective psychic effort, much as indigenous groups like the Hopi used initiatory ritual and trance dances to bring rain down from the sky.

I pray this is the universe’s wager for us: that we will go beyond our current ruts and limitations, that we will manifest a future of imaginative joy by stepping into our potential, becoming the wizards, warriors, and initiates that the world needs so desperately now. As Nietzsche pointed out accurately, “man”, in his current form, can only be a transitional creature. Either we are rapidly approaching the terminus point for our species or we can collectively choose to transmute, creating an evolutionary implosion, from the physical to the psychic realm. As the oil gushes forth and the earth’s resources disappear, it may be that we can learn to thrive on subtler and far more powerful forms of energy. Working together, we can guide the world toward its next phase of being – a plateau of intensified consciousness and synchronic coherence, in which conscious evolution becomes both sacred game and participatory art form.

 

Image: "Phoenix" by Jurvetson on Flickr courtsey of Creative Commons Licensing 

 

Comments

Well Said

I agree with one exception. "I think it is quite possible that even the course of seemingly unstoppable biospheric and geophysical events, like climate change or the oil spill, could be altered through collective psychic effort, much as indigenous groups like the Hopi used initiatory ritual and trance dances to bring rain down from the sky." I would not equate the oil spill with the Theory of Anthropogenic Climate Change. In doing so you do the bidding of the Bilderberger's and other elites who crafted this insidious form of propaganda for the purpose of enacting Cap and Trade. When will you awaken to this Daniel? What does it take for you to revisit a paradigm you have accepted and has proven to be false on so many levels? I appreciate your ability to articulate these concepts but am disturbed by your lack of willingness to investigate the "other" perspectives available on "climate change". Thank you for a great article. Please update your research on "climate change" -Nano PS> You could always hold a debate on this issue. You have the means to shift memes.

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

 

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

Hi!

There is very scary things happening now with earth changes and the oilspill and Iran crisis and more. Many distinguished scientists have written about pole shifts and how the earth can change in a few hours, even Albert Einstein was for the theory. I truly Wonder what the earth would look like if this happened?Check this!

http://www.doomsdaytube.com/

bravo!

Thanks Daniel. Thanks for transmitting here. Something important just clicked for me after reading this, and I really needed it. That's all I'll say. You're the best, man! lots of love, Adam Elenbaas

Crisis Breeds Opportunity

Propaganda Anonymous

Interesting Read Daniel

Thank You

"Crisis Breeds Opportunity"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO91uccMbZo

 

Prop!

 

Club or Rome and "Global Warming". The Rockefeller connection

http://hubpages.com/hub/Club_of_Rome In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." — in The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105 by Alexander King, founder of the Club of Rome and Bertrand Schneider, secretary of the Club of Rome lub of Rome is the Elite Think Tank behind ideas such as "Sustainable Development" and "Global Warming" like the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Henry Kissinger is one of his member - as many like who is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) - a Rockefeller's organization founded by one of his agent Colonel House - and one of his secret president has been Dick Cheney by his own confession see his video speech here. Originally this group was organized in 1968 by the Morgenthau Group and the majority of Club of Rome executives were drawn from NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). During the period 1968-1972, The Club of Rome became a cohesive entity of new-science scientists, Globalist, future planners and internationalists of every stripe. The Club of Rome is famous for promoting the idea of "Limits to Growth" like in a 1972 book modeling the consequences of a rapidly growing world population and finite resource supplies. This is just the same kind of Malthus ideas when he wrote An Essay on the Principle of Population. Not astonishingly, critics have charged the Club of Rome with "Neo-Malthusianism" and strong elitism in its membership, which interlocks with European power elite groups such as Bilderberg (with such members as David Rockefeller) and to a lesser degree Anglo-American elite members. More recently the Elite Agenda of Club of Rome is hidden behind ideas such as "Sustainable Development" and "Global Warming" see Rockefeller Brothers Fund article.

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

 

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

elephantisis

 hi PE,

 so are you saying that climate change is not happening?, or simply that human beings are not causing it? 

 I think it is quite clear that climate change is happening. My mother was able to skate on the Hudson River when she was a kid. I could skate on the ponds on Central Park. Now it rarely gets cold enough for even the ponds to freeze over safely. We can see visual snapshots of the glaciers and polar icecaps around the world, and they are clearly disappearing at an extremely rapid rate. 

 We also pump over 6 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year, which has a measurable effect on the proportion of gasses in the atmosphere. 

Is is quite possible that other factors are also contributing to climate change? Yes. I am very interested in Alexey Dmitriev's theory that the entire solar system is undergoing a high energy transition right now, and we see very anomalous behavior on the sun, various planets forming atmospheres or undergoing polar reversals, and then simply wacky phenomena like the disappearance of one of Jupiter's spots or the gigantic swirling hexagon found on Saturn. 

  I believe the correct view is one that approaches the subject through nondualism. Humans are affecting the change of the climate, but in doing this, we are just reacting mechanically, like the molecules altering their behavior on Saturn or Jupiter. If humanity on the earth snaps into a more encompassing and intensified form of consciousness, this will also reflect the energetic shifts taking place across the solar system. "As above, so below," as the hermetic traditions tell us. 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

RE: Climate Change and the cure for Elephantitis

Greetings Daniel,

 

First of all thank you for working to create this important channel for enlightening conversation. 
My intentions in pointing out the factual errors of your perspective on climate change are in no way meant to demean you or the great work you have done and continue to do to wake up Humanity. 

Rather I hope that with access to alternative scientific perspectives you may appropriately revise your pronouncements on "climate change",  being amongst the various signs of the Apocalypse one may encounter as we move towards Dec 21st. 2012.

 This does not imply that we needn't be environmentally conscious or aware.  Rather that we not be duped by those who would have us spread their propaganda for them, under the guise of Environmental crises, and that we understand the intentions of those who originally created the IPCC, their financial stake in creating this ruse and their ultimate goal of creating an unheralded new form of taxation that will do nothing to alleviate the numerous Real ecological crises we now face.

 

A few examples of their disinformation having informed your opinion were supplied in your response.  I will begin there

 

"so are you saying that climate change is not happening?, or simply that human beings are not causing it?"




 

"Climate Change"  formerly known as "Global Warming" is always happening.  This intentionally ambiguous branding could never be denied as the climate is always changing and has always changed.  This is a great representation of modern double think.

Human beings are contributing to climate change as evidenced in the well documented phenomena of the Urban Heat Island effect.  The unproving connection of climate change due to Co2 emissions is however not the driving factor in any appreciable shift in climate that we have seen.  Especially not on the catastrophic level that the IPCC would have us believe.  We are after all talking about a barely 1 degree increase in temperature in the last century. 

"I think it is quite clear that climate change is happening. My mother was able to skate on the Hudson River when she was a kid. I could skate on the ponds on Central Park. Now it rarely gets cold enough for even the ponds to freeze over safely. We can see visual snapshots of the glaciers and polar icecaps around the world, and they are clearly disappearing at an extremely rapid rate."




 

This may be a regional effect and is not proof of AGW Anthropogenic Global Warming as being the cause whatsoever. (remember the Urban Heat Island Effect) We have been in a warming trend for the last 150 years (well before mankind was even capable of contributing a significant amount of Co2 into the atmosphere, and again it has not been proven that Co2 drives temperature change in the atmosphere)


"We can see visual snapshots of the glaciers and polar ice caps around the world, and they are clearly disappearing at an extremely rapid rate."

 

What then of the Glaciers that are growing at a prodigious rate?   This is verified by numerous glaciologist and yet never seems to make it into the IPCC summary for policy makers manuals.
http://www.ihatethemedia.com/12-more-glaciers-that-havent-heard-the-news-about-global-warming


Giving the context of the elitists stated desire to enforce Cap and Trade with the E.P.A going so far as to label Co2 (what we exhale and plants eat) a pollutant to be regulated.  Wouldn't it be wise to heed the various warnings from unembedded climatologist, glaciologists and other meteorological scientists who disagree with the findings of the IPCC?  (Keep in mind this is the same EPA which is allowing BP to dump Corexit into the gulf in upwards of 25,000 gallons/day, the same EPA who told the first responders that the air at Ground Zero was safe)

 

"It seems increasingly obvious that, if we wish to survive as a species, the current ruling corporate, political, and financial elite – working seamlessly together to bring about our collective suicide – must be deposed, replaced by a new orchestration of civil society, an openly democratic and truly transparent system, where nothing is hidden, where profit is not the only motivation, and all have a voice." 

 

Keep in mind the originators of "global warming" and "climate change" are the same elitist you have identified as needing to be deposed and replaced.  Why then should we trust there "science" to give us an adequate picture of the world we live in and its supposed climate perils. 


"..truly transparent system"  Well then let's start with our own garden.  Let's have an authentic discussion of the science right here on RS.  We could even hold a debate and let the audience decide whether our exhalations shall be taxed because of a theoretical crisis.  This would surely gather an immense amount of attention and give everyone an opportunity to settle the matter publicly in an open forum. 

You just have to convince anyone from the pro AGW side to be willing to do so.  There seem to be no real takers in a fair and moderated environment to debate openly the underlying science behind their claims with those scientist who are in opposition.


Of course I appreciate that you have made room for Randall Carlson's presentation here on RS.   I would appreciate your analysis of his presentation and if you find that you may have been in error. You will gain even more of my respect in admitting that you may have been misled just like so many of us who do care about the environment.  There is no shame in becoming aware of a intellectual misstep and correcting it.   This is of course what Science is dependent upon for progress.

Thank you kindly for your time and your good work.
-Nano (The Nano Thermitic Pink Elephant)

PS> To everyone reading, don't take my word for it. Do your research. Ask questions. Here is a good place to start (complete with peer reviewed sources)

"Climate Change: A Catastrophist's Perspective"

http://www.realitysandwich.com/video/climate_change_1




cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
 
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."


<p>
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
&quot;An Elephant Never Forgets....&quot; 
</p>


cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

open discussion

 hi PE,

 

if you want to write an article on the revisionsit approach to climate change, and can do so in a way that is reasonable, we can publish it on Reality Sandwich, and debate will follow in the comments. 

 How do you know that the anti-anthropogenic perspective is not, in itself, a product of a certain effort toward disinformation? Didn't the biggest contributors to climate change - the oil and gas industry -  seek to hide or have dismissed data that shows that CO2 rise is directly linked to their activities for decades? Didn't they spend many millions on this? Since those are the industries that fund Bush and Cheney and now Obama, etc, wouldn't it seem more likely that if they could prove that climate change was unrelated to human activity, and a purely natural process that we barely influence, they would have done so, paying however much it would cost to produce studies supporting this line of thought?

 I think the whole notion of conspiracy, Illuminati etc, needs to be addressed extremely carefully - it is also very difficult to do this, as there are many veils over it. Those forces we would like to point at as evil geniuses behind the situation are perhaps far more reactive than they are actively conspiring. Now, in this reactivity, they may end up colluding with occult forces ("powers and principalities") that gain benefit from our ignorance and inactivity, and are using subconscious programming to bring about a particular situation on the planet. 

 We need to reach another level of sophistication in our parsing of these issues, as otherwise it becomes a continual, boring psychic energy drain that keeps us from strategizing, working together, and creating the positive and benevolent altternative that is possible for our human family and our collective future. 

 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

Unanswered Questions

"if you want to write an article on the revisionsit approach to climate change, and can do so in a way that is reasonable, we can publish it on Reality Sandwich, and debate will follow in the comments."

 I would be happy to do so.  Thank you for the opportunity. I applaud your willingness to hear different perspectives in this forum.  This would be integrous with the manifesto you provided in your post.

 

" How do you know that the anti-anthropogenic perspective is not, in itself, a product of a certain effort toward disinformation? Didn't the biggest contributors to climate change - the oil and gas industry -  seek to hide or have dismissed data that shows that CO2 rise is directly linked to their activities for decades? Didn't they spend many millions on this? Since those are the industries that fund Bush and Cheney and now Obama, etc, wouldn't it seem more likely that if they could prove that climate change was unrelated to human activity, and a purely natural process that we barely influence, they would have done so, paying however much it would cost to produce studies supporting this line of thought?"

To answer this I must restate that the link between increased Co2 in the atmosphere and the catastrophic rise of temperature has been refuted completely by the scientific community.  This is why the British High Court ruled that "An Inconvenient Truth" has 11 scientific errors in it's presentation.  Most notably Mann's Hockey stick graph which is the underpinning of the entire thoery of AGW due to Co2 enhancement.

Here is but one scientist who has proven the methods utilized are deeply flawed and do not support the actual temperature data.

"The hockey stick debate is about two things. At a technical level it concerns a well-known study that characterized the state of the Earth’s climate over the past thousand years and seemed to prove a recent and unprecedented global warming. I will explain how the study got the results it did, examine some key flaws in the methodology and explain why the conclusions are unsupported by the data. At the political level the emerging debate is about whether the enormous international trust that has been placed in the IPCC was betrayed. The hockey stick story reveals that the IPCC allowed a deeply flawed study to dominate the Third Assessment Report, which suggests the possibility of bias in the Report-writing process. In view of the massive global influence of IPCC Reports, there is an urgent need to bias-proof future assessments in order to put climate policy onto a new foundation that will better serve the public interest."

http://climateaudit.org/2005/04/08/mckitrick-what-the-hockey-stick-debat...

 "Didn't the biggest contributors to climate change - the oil and gas industry -  seek to hide or have dismissed data that shows that CO2 rise is directly linked to their activities for decades? Didn't they spend many millions on this?"

Again you are presuming that Co2 is driving "climate change" and that this is an easy left/right paradigm argument.  I have no love for big oil companies as they obviously are just another blood sucking corporate entity out to increase market share regardless of it's effect on the enviornment or economy.  Yet I must say that this is clever misdirection designed to confuse the masses and give them an approved boogieman to project their anger upon in regards to "climate change".

The same tactics are used across the board politically.  A resonant analog is the war on terror.

We have there again an oversimplified boogie man who we are allowed to blame and hate for attacking us.

And it is also very telling that the millions of dollars you speak of in terms of funding anti-Agw research is completely dwarfed by the money allotted to the IPCC for their pro-Agw agenda.  Which is known to have increased from 2 Billion dollars a year to know 4 Billion annually.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ArtLNXDAMs&feature=youtube_gdata

And also note that Al Gore is spending upwards of $300 Million dollars to advertise his own revisionist perspective on "climate change" 

"Former vice president Al Gore will launch a three-year, $300 million campaign Wednesday aimed at mobilizing Americans to push for aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, a move that ranks as one of the most ambitious and costly public advocacy campaigns in U.S. history."  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/30/AR2008033001880.html

How many millions are you sighting exactly? And what is your source? I think again it is interesting to note that the reasoning that Big Oil must be behind any research that disproves the agenda of the IPCC and Al Gore is brought under scrutiny but the Billions of dollars annually of Gov't sponsored research is not.

It is understandable for private companies to fund science that would prevent a new form of taxation being heaped upon them in any regard.  This does not exonerate the IPCC for shoddy science or Al Gore for blatant fear mongering.  Also it does not make them Altruistic for advocating for a Cap and Tax while they have positioned themselves to profit enormously if they were able to force this upon the population.  This does not mean I advocate for or endorse big oil in any way shape or form.  We see warring factions of the same ilk everyday competing for dominance and willing to use any means (Democrats and Republicans come to mind)

And again there are thousands of scientists not funded by either the IPCC or big oil who disagree with the findings of the IPCC.  Not to mention the numerous scientists within the IPCC who dissent.

 

"I think the whole notion of conspiracy, Illuminati etc, needs to be addressed extremely carefully - it is also very difficult to do this, as there are many veils over it. Those forces we would like to point at as evil geniuses behind the situation are perhaps far more reactive than they are actively conspiring. Now, in this reactivity, they may end up colluding with occult forces ("powers and principalities") that gain benefit from our ignorance and inactivity, and are using subconscious programming to bring about a particular situation on the planet. 


I never mentioned the "Illuminati" I will leave that to Dan Brown.

I did present evidence in a previous post of the Club of Rome and it's own words describing how they would create this climate crisis for their own ends.  

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, (ie. the new boogie man) we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

 

— in The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105 by Alexander King, founder of the Club of Rome and Bertrand Schneider, secretary of the Club of Rome"

 

"Those forces we would like to point at as evil geniuses behind the situation are perhaps far more reactive than they are actively conspiring."  Perhaps is the important operative word here.

 

"We need to reach another level of sophistication in our parsing of these issues, as otherwise it becomes a continual, boring psychic energy drain that keeps us from strategizing, working together, and creating the positive and benevolent altternative that is possible for our human family and our collective future."

I agree.  I suggest that we make the time to hear both sides, look at who is spending the most money and who stands to benefit the most if Cap and Tax is passed. This is the underlying agenda. It is easily verifiable if one is willing just to look for themselves. 

The answers are quite simple.  They just require humility, honesty, and integrity to sift through the various perspectives.  Science is the best force we have still for winnowing truth from lie.

If we want to work together we need something akin to the peer review process in order to determine what bedrock we can construct our desired egalitarian society and communities upon.

Again I would appreciate you exercising a more scientific approach with this matter.  You wield an immense amount of influence at this moment and it would be a shame to discover you had been advocating something that does not align with your good intentions.

This again does not take anything away from the fantastic  work you are doing in rallying mankind to work together to consciously evolve and seek alternative methods of communal survival than those enforced by the dominator culture.  My statements also do not take away from your incredible ability to articulate the pulse of our particular zeitgeist.


I commend you for your good work. I only hope you can step outside your previous belief system long enough to consider with an open mind why so many scientists disagree with the findings fo the IPCC.  To consider the immense amount of harm that would be inflicted on the poor of the world if Cap and Tax were to become law. (reference Copenhagen and the leaked danish text,http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/09/copenhagen-summit-danish-text-leak)

Climategate is also a very telling indictment of the completely unscientific manner by which the IPCC has arrived at their alarming data points.  This takes the blame off of you and eveyone else (Myself included) who initially bought into their hyperbolic doomsday claims.  But alas in the age of Revelation we are seeing more and more incidences where mass manipulation can be unmasked and for our species to become aware of the power of propaganda in shaping our perspectives.


Wishing you all the Best

 

-Nano (The Nano Thermitic Pink Elephant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

 

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

The Evidence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAvqLJSphjI&feature=player_embedded#!

  I got tired of my friends saying things like "Lol you and your theories" and "Omg you're obsessed with conspiracy theories". Theories this, theories that. Beliefs this, beliefs that. One word that never comes up is evidence. So I thought I'd make a video simply called "Evidence", loaded with documented facts.

 

Thank you to Scottie Royale for the Amazing Video!!

 

Please Please Watch and Decide for yourselves!!

-Nano (Google Nano Thermite, 911, WTC, 7, Building 7)

MY CAPTCHA FORTUNE READS

"VIOLATED IMMOLATE"

Definition of Immolate is 

Inflected Form(s): im·mo·lat·ed; im·mo·lat·ing Etymology: Latin immolatus, past participle of immolare to sprinkle with meal before sacrificing, sacrifice, from in- + mola sacrificial barley cake, literally, millstone; akin to Latin molere to grind — more at meal Date: 15th century

1 : to offer in sacrifice; especially : to kill as a sacrificial victim
2 : to kill or destroy often by fire

 

Got to love when Captcha Synchromystically gives you the truth.

 Captcha breaks down what happened on 9/11

Violated Immolate Captcha : Captcha breaks down what happened on 9/11

 

 

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7

 

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

human imprints

P.E.C.

While I agree slightly that there are a lot of wealthy people who are putting a spin on the global warming issues, and using this spin to pull their own initiatives into sync with our efforts to stop Gaia's Death...  I think you, and people like you are really REALLY frustrating...  

Here this: we are seeing massive amounts of species extinctions, the world is melting, the Oceans are toxic, filled with trash, the floors of the ocean are covered in trash from wars, powerplants, trash, and many places the ocean floor has been cut to shreds with dragging and more.  

There are a few things though, that not many people realize about global warming and humanities' effects on the environment: urban heat effect, pavement affixiation of the soils, and tree  culling are HUGE issues that are getting glossed over.  

There are stories of the USA before Paul Bunyan, that a squirrel could leap from tree to tree to make it all the way to Montana from Boston...  Almost all these forest have been cut down twice.. Each time we cut a forest down, they grow back different.   

We are helping the rich people by trying to stop this?

I am an urban designer, architect, trained to build and design these cities.  I have often longed to find a way to keep the forest, and not destroy the environment.. I have stood up in meeting after meeting to point out things that no one thinks about in my field... I am not alone, but close to being alone.

The mass of architects in the world realize something is wrong, but have not one clue that they are following blindly the same path that is destroying the world.  We need to leave living footprints, and live with what I am calling "naked tech"

This and more are in my heart, and I am trying to blog about it, but as you can see, my ability to write is rather um....

Seer of Hear,

Shadoan

RE: Frustration with dissenting opinion

 Dear Shadoan,


I am sorry I and people like myself frustrate you. Maybe if you listen to what we are presenting more intently you will realize the source of your frustration.

Here is a fellow architect and lover of natures presentation that is informing my and the people liek me's perspective on this issue.

 

http://www.realitysandwich.com/video/climate_change_1

Please make the time to understand what I and others are trying to say and then feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.


Best wishes always

 

-Nano

PS> To be of the opinion that "climate change" is not a real threat does not mean that I support the destruction of the environment.  What would give you that idea is the question you should ask.

 

 

 

cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective

 

"An Elephant Never Forgets...."

Awakening

Just prior to the oil spill, I spent several weeks waking up in the middle of the night with a sense of deep dread. The dreams revolved around panic, but I could not decipher what was causing these emotions. I'm normally a sound sleeper and dreamer, and there had been no great changes in my life or routine. Soon there after, at a sweat, someone else mentioned having the same experience. As we talked, others, too mentioned similar experiences. I agree wholeheartedly that we are on the edge of great changes, and many of us are tuning in. I, too, oscillate between despair and hope. The images of the oil spill are filled with doom. It's unfolding, whatever it is. Thanks for another well-written and fascinating piece, Daniel.

'If the current effort to

'If the current effort to build relief wells fails or is ineffective, there are no more known technological fixes available.'

Apparently they do have a back up plan should the relief wells fail that would involve 'continuing to collect the oil through several systems at the wellhead and pumping it through a subsea pipeline to an existing production platform at least several miles away..'

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/us/29wells.html?src=mv

relief wells etc

 BP definitely doesn't want to give up on extracting that oil - by some estimates, it could be 25 billion barrels under there.

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

BP is behaving like a bank robber with a police uniform on.

They are definitely playing this out, to keep their post and position so that they can get as much oil, gas, etc before we shove them off... 

 

Very Informative

I must say this was a great article, however I also believe that we as consumers need to start looking at our own patterns of consumption. It is very easy to blame the corporations and yet do I look at where all my goods are coming from? They are just fulfilling demand and their pocket, while the earth takes a beating.

consumerism

 

Hi Shiva,

Yes I agree. We need to look at our own behavior. The corporate sociopaths reflect back at us all the ways we individually and collectively fail to take responsibility, and continue to pass the buck.

And yet, when it gets to the point that these corporate leaders commit genocide and make entire eco-systems go extinct, I believe "we the people" need to rise up, so that justice is done against them. 

I remember when I asked a Hopi elder what should be done with those who had forced a coal mine on the Hopi reservation, destroying their sacred aquifer, and he replied with equinimity, "Cut off their heads." This shocked me at first, but when I considered it from his perspective, I could see his point of view. 

I know it is very 'pc' to be nonviolent and to think that any use of violence is wrong, and I certainly don't advocate violence, but I do think this view must also be interrogated. John Lash's book Not In His Image discusses this in a very interesting way, related to Christian morality, such as "turn the other cheek", principles and precepts that work great for a violent dominator but leave those who would resist domination unable to fight back. This is a very important debate also taken up in recent works on Gandhi such as Mark Kurlansky's book on nonviolence / satyagraha. 

I am reading Alinsky's Rules for Radicals right now, and he points out that there really are no rules in a real fight. He believes Gandhi was being strategic in his use of nonviolence, as it was the best approach considering his particular situation. We are also in a situation where nonviolent methods most probably make the most sense, as overriding force is held in the opponents' hands. What the progressive/radical community must quickly figure out is what effective tactics are available to us - perhaps there are none, and the situation is hopeless, or perhaps the only tactic is to prepare the alternative social model (complementary currency, permaculture communities, alternative energy) and hope that there is enough of a living world left to allow our species some continuity, when the dust clears after peak oil brings about the fall of Empire. 

The first thing that would have to happen is a unification of progressive groups and interests. If you had 20 million people including all of the computer scientists and engineers orchestrated in a week-long general strike for a new energy program or monetary system, re-done on a massive rapid scale, for instance, it might be possible to start making some changes.

The technology of the Internet does allow for that sort of rapid scalability, so until it is takenaway from us (if that is possible), this is one of the areas where hope, however faint, still lives. 

 

 

Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

Consumerism

Hello once again Daniel,

We can already see movements all around the world where people are changing

their patternsin lifestyle. These movements are rarely or ever televised. Even with all the technology we have, word of mouth still speads fast in communities.

Even though these changes are happening at different rates, they are still happening.

My faith is, the faith in humanity. Tested often.

Sometimes instead of rallies IMHO, boycotting for me is the best method, that is how I use my voice. Instead of giving power over to a corporation, who when they fail and later blame, I look for alternatives by using technologies to find those other communites to find ideas to implement where I live. I do however sometimes fail in my consumption patterns, I just think with methods like this site and others 

we continue to pass on the message and ideas on we as human beings canchange.

All the power Elites are human beings as well who think they have good intentions,hopefully they will see  the errors in their ways.

We all love and hopefully that is one message that can continue to pass on and remember.

Thank you for your response and I will definitely look into the books you have mentionned and your feedback. Continued success to all of you here at Reality Sandwich

Brightest blessings to you

Nice post Daniel

Nice post Daniel.

You said, "I believe that we are currently in transition from the physical to the psychic phase of our evolution as a species. In order to manifest this, we would need to develop a shared realization that such a shift is possible. This requires an open dialogue on the legitimacy of psychic phenomena and synchronicity, building a foundation for general acceptance of the powers and potencies contained within the psyche."

You are right, we are in a cosmic alchemical process. But you are wrong about what is required to manifest it. Dialogue and building foundations is not what is required. It's too late for that now. Either the oil spill is a controlled catastrophe designed to play into 'UFO disclosure', or it's a required stage of our global 'shamanic' initiation. The next stage would probably be a sort of collective psychic NDE. 

  Whatever happens the archetype of rebirth will be with us, in all its forms.   

dialogue and foundation

 Hi S of S,

 Dialogue and building foundations can happen quite quickly. The current communications technologies allow for an exponential scaling-up, and human culture can evolve extremely rapidly. 

 We do still need to build foundations and open dialogue, although, yes, the hour is getting late. 

 The collective psychic NDE - or just brutal collective DE - may be where this is heading. Perhaps it gets sorted out on the astral plane. 

As for UFOS and aliens, yes, I do consider that technologies exist which could solve this problem. If the Government admits that it has the answer through technologies they have accessed via the Grey Aliens, then I wlll be quite tempted to agree with those who believe the spill itself was a conspiratorial gambit. 

I am compelled by the Nassim Haramein/Graham Hancock notion that the "Ark of the Covenant" and perhaps other Arks, were actually anti-gravity energy machines based on the structure of the vacuum, and the US Secret Gov may have one in its possession. If this is the case, it is quite possible that the Gulf could be opened up to allow a stopping of the leak, as the Red Sea was parted. 

 However according to Nassim's thesis, the Ark can only function effectively when it is used by someone at a high grade of initiatory consciousness - the "pure of heart." Such a person would be be hard to find in the military industrial complex. This also suggests my hypothesis that there is going to be, possibly, a quite sudden inversion in what constitutes power and authority as we go deeper into the transition. The last shall be first, and the first shall be last, as someone said somewhere. 

 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

I'm Divided

I'm divided as to which path this will take. 'UFO Discloser' is what my inner conspiracy theorist says, given all the media hype lately.

Global NDE is what my inner pessimist says.

  My inner optimist says the oil spill really was an accident and our alien brothers, who hopefully are what they seem to be, will pick this crisitunity to reveal themselves through Obama.   

comment

below

excellent writing Daniel

Still a little bit of fear there though, trust your own path.

 All bridges can be rebuilt.

fear

 hi dewey,

yes, some fear. it is a legitimate emotion, don't you think?

i see fear as a natural emotional response - kind of like an auto-immune response to things that are terrifying. I don't really see the point in denying or suppressing fear, or pretending it doesn't exist. I think we are better served by recognizing it, and working with it. 

 Fear is inevitable, but by acknowledging it, you can master it, instead of being overwhelmed by it. 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

fear is structure?

 

I like the idea that fear is structure. You can't feel fear. You can react to fear and feel scared. All structure is fear. The universe is a balance of fear and love.

Structures change and structures die. Built into their very nature is their termination. Take away fear and love remains.

I think we should bi-pass the conversation about love or fear (which is what it often turns into----do we employ structural tactics, which ones, OR should we turn the other cheek, should we transcend the struggle, tap out and tap into God, etc).

To me the real question is how can we have more experiences of love so that our old structures get taken down and new ones rebuilt?

But most people aren't willing to go there because they want the easy way out.

It's either love or fear. It's either agnosticism and reason, or it's "love is all there is, bliss out, tune out, it's all just an illusion anyway."

The reason I like Jesus' message is because he was the first prophet to really suggest the idea that the message of enlightenment (God is love and love is eternal and you are one with God) become socially active (create heaven on earth). 

To me the "In his Image" guy had very few quality insights into the heart and soul of the Christian movement. He had an agenda, and I think he was wrong.

I think Jesus was a real person who had an incredibly powerful and very distinct, universal message of socially conscious, humanitarian love. It seems to me that it was also deeply steeped in esoteric levels of consciousness. And I think the evidence of his existence is overwhelming (check out Lee Strobel's "The Case for Christ" or Greg Boyd's book "God at War"). I was disappointed by his lack of theological imagination. There are so many incredible biblical scholars out there writing amazing things about the life of Jesus that are so far outside of the "Christian" value sets he describes. Matthew Fox is another such wonderful writer.

Can anybody name another great world avatar who knocked money tables in the temples and ridiculed public religious figures? Even if he wasn't real, the point remains that we apparently need an avatar to rise up and preach a gospel that is both proactive and peaceful. This avatar knows better than to play the "principle" game (it's wrong on principle to lash out).  Instead, the only rule is to stay grounded in the presence of God's holy spirit (which is the manifestation of love in structures, in time and space, in fear). 

Jesus himself said, "People say that I came to bring peace, but I also came to bring fire and the sword."

We can build better structures if our love of love incorporates discipline and structure. They have to dialog rather than sit at opposite sides of the room, pissed off because they've been pissed off for centuries.

Has our species ever had a collective initiation rite of passage? Who are the elders in this situation? Not simply the indigenous peoples. They, like us, are new to this moment. My sense is that one of them is the plants themselves.

I sense more are coming...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adam Elenbaas

Jesus

 Hi Adam,

 Thanks for your comment. 

 The aspects of Not in His Image that fascinated me were Lash's depictions of Gnostic cosmology: The Archons and the Demiurge and Sophia, the idea that the Gnostics were actually holders of ancient mystery wisdom and saw Christianity as a deviation prepared by "off planet entities." This all rings oddly true for me. 

As for whether or not Jesus was a "real" individual, can I ask you why it matters so much to you? Clearly there is much archetypal material woven around Jesus - whoever he actually was, myth filled up the spaces around him. Isn't the really important thing what we do with ourselves now? I don't see how the question of Jesus's life really matters that much. Isn't the point that Jesus represents the archetypal Self, in any case? 

 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke

 

jesus's life

well, in order for jesus to represent anything inside of us wouldn't we have to know who he was and what he did in order for him to be anything? You can't just have an archetypal figure and not have any background on the figure.

 

you are Quetzalcoatl right? an Archetypal figure and in order for you to fully accept this power you no doubt had to learn a bit about the energy you were bestowed with in order to use it properly right? so the same with JC.

Plants As Elders

Adam,

You're onto something. I just love that you said the plants are our elders -- you're right. A very inspiring concept. And applies to not just the psychedelics, either.

Becky

www.FirstWays.com 

God help us

It is bewildering to me that we find ourselves in such insane circumstances. Hasn't the outcome of the course we are on been painfully apparent for at least the last sixty years? If not sixty years, at least for the entirety of my life as a literate citizen? I have spoken out, voted, conversed, participated in activism, made choices that have reduced the environmental impact of my own life to the detriment of my financial security and affected my relationships, emigrated to France for a third of my adulthood, shared information with everyone willing to listen, advocated for ideas that propose an alternative and all to no avail. Things keep spinning precipitously toward cataclysm in the hands of madmen.

 

In the late 1950's Edward Abbey wrote these words (which were not published until the late sixties):

 

"No, wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit, and as vital to our lives as water and good bread. A civilization which destroys what little remains of the wild, the spare, the original, is cutting itself off from its origins and betraying the principal of civilization itself.

 

If industrial man continues to multiply and expand his operations he will succeed in his apparent intention, to seal himself off from the natural and isolate himself within a synthetic prison of his own making. He will make himself an exile from the earth and then will know at last, if he is still capable of feeling anything, the pain and agony of final loss."

 

Like you Daniel, I feel the consequences of the Gulf oil spill have been vastly understated. The comments in this thread indicate that even readers of this website deny the reality -which I have seen with my own eyes throughout the course of my life- of global warming created by the human burning of fossil fuels.

 

What is this stubborn, obtuse blindness!?! In the face of oceans of facts and of such informed, articulate and prescient observers as Abbey and the scores like him, from the Hopi elders to Loren Eiseley and Rachel Carson.

 

I am furious, exasperated and inclined to think "Fuck 'em all! They deserve to die like pelicans in oil sludge!"

 

And yet I share your hope and prayers that there will be some kind of saving magical awakening... even though my faith in magic is nothing more than faith, an imaginative speculation based on scant and subjective intuitions...

Waiting for the shift

If in fact the fossil fuel spurting up out of our ocean floor is normally acting as a lubricant that eases the lateral slipping plate movement under the ocean as discussed in the plate tectonics theory, then once the oil is gone the movement may become too rigid causing the plates to stick together and once this happens the pressure builds and when the pressure is suddenly released the plates jerk apart which causes an earthquake beneath the North American Plates. Thank you for the interesting article.

The black gold of 12 thousand years ignites

I was looking over some poems that I wrote in 1992, and came across a couple of sections that seem to refer obliquely to the oil crisis in the Gulf. During that period, the great challenge for me was to sort through and separate images that were purely imaginative from images that seemed to resonate with a larger pattern that was struggling to emerge into visibility.

Now, there are times that I almost have to pinch myself, because I cannot believe that what I am seeing is being acted out in the “external” world. I feel that , somehow, I must have gotten lost inside of a trance state, and that I will at any moment return to the world that I used to know.

From “To Akasha/ Part 2, section 8”:

The great snake of the ocean flames. Its plumes have made a robe of Texaco. It has swallowed several continents.

From “The Descent”:

Not 1 leaf stirs. The sea has met its death by accident. The tree Yggdrasil has been hacked at the root. Nidhogg gnaws on talking skulls.

On a blackened branch, the elders of Tibet hang upside down.

Out of Vond and Strond is cranked up, on 12 stellar chains, a diamond. It drips with heavy water. A naked Shulamite has fed it with pornography.

In Mayapan the flowery wars have filled up every trench, each vortex and 4 sided box. Living space-suits again gather at the games that will close the great precession of the equinox. The ceremonial flame is rekindled from an atom. The oil is poured out. A great urn is upended by Ken and Barbie in the sky. On that urn is stamped  “Auto-Motive Man.” Its ensign—the 5 pointed star.

The hemispheres are split with lightning. The black gold of 12 thousand years ignites. The well of hearts has shot towards the exosphere its wad. The cameras of Skylab fall smoking to Assyria. To the brothels stocked by aliens for Ashurbanipal. The Earth has now reverted to 4 elements—plus 1.

I'm very scared. When the

I'm very scared. When the devastation hits or we finally understand its parameters in some shocking debacle that's actually just removal of denial, it will feel like a sneak attack, though it's been here all along. We've been harboring it. Even spreading this knowledge just feels like more placating of the self. Is there really something we can do? Hone our survival skills? Probably, since one of our problems is how easily we can live without them.

 

Spreading consciousness is a difficult intention. A higher consciousness is often a byproduct of tragedy, creating a rift, a chance to reconnect the divide, which fits into this story.. And it's a compelling story. Story might be another way to expand consciousness. I hope a lot of people read this piece; I will definitely share it.

Indeed.

I agree with what you are saying here. The minute I heard about the oil spill I instantly knew it was part of the breakdown. I admit I do not want to experience that but also know that it has to happen. What I find the most interesting is that no one is talking about it. At least in my daily life. It's like we just want to pretend it is not happening. (myself included) I wonder how long it will be before I feel the effects of this disaster and the more that are bound to follow. I have this deep inner desire to be a part of the change and the new world and I am part of it to some extent, but still I am living my life as usual. How long before everything truly breaks down. A year? Two? What then? How can we possibly rebuild this planet with so many people and so much confusion. I like to think there are many of us who are tuned in to the need for change, but when I look around I am dismayed. Maybe its because I live in Wisconsin. Not sure but I continue to learn as much as I can, listen and pray and hope for the best and know that at any moment things could change without anyway back into the way once things were. -josh

rebuilding

 "How can we possibly rebuild this planet with so many people and so much confusion?"

 

I believe it will be possible to rebuild this place because when all is said and done there very well could be a lot less people and those left will prolly be far less confused than what you're seeing now.  the world is changing and there are a lot of people still plugged in and not ready for that change and we have to be prepared for that.  We in the know have to be prepared for those who are not and we have to be prepared to handle death, perhaps a lot of it.  

 I think about all the people on medications and completely dependent on them, body, mind and soul and what if things are so disrupted that they can't get their meds and then whatever ails them finally gets them.  then there are the storms and natural disasters, and then what of the spiritual side of it?  It is the apocalypse and all truth shall be revealed  and we are living in a dominant false christian society and what happens when the truth is revealed and people can't handle it?  People can snap when their reality is challenged.

All in all, it does look grim, but what can you do?  grab your loved ones, think positive and sit tight and be prepared for anything really, but in the end, even though many may die, I do believe it is for the best, in order to cleanse the earth of her parasitical attackers and create great change, change that would not happen if the earth didn't take charge and fight back with storms and whatnot to unplug the masses and make them step outside their hermetically sealed lives to get together to help each other out and to see what it really is to be human again, to be alive again.  

 And with the truth revealed the confusion should clear up, things will be lit up.  Have faith, I'm there is a Divine Plan, a great Divine Light that guides us and wants us here.  as long as you want the Light that is.

 

In Lak'ech Ala K'in

some thoughts to consider

Considering Terence Mckenna got trashed a little bit on another blog recently on RS, I would like to highlight something he said in relationship to worry and fear regarding apocalyptic scenarios, something told to him from 'the other'.

 

"You don't know enough to worry" 

 

Great article though, I do have to admit, I am worried about that oil spill none the less, and do get a shiver or a shutter or two in relationship to it's nature and role in our coming global transformation, it introduces itself as a harbinger of sorts. 

A beautiful and necessary essay

Many thanks for this timely piece. It's exactly the type of shared reflection that's needed right now.

One of the most purely astonishing aspects of the Gulf situation, at least as I've experienced it, is the way it has instantly gotten under our collective skin. My father-in-law, for instance, couldn't sleep a couple of weeks ago because of recurring nightmares that oil was rising up and swamping his bed. My wife, who generally hasn't shared my sentiment of impending apocalypse (in both the revelatory and disastrous senses) over the past several years, is now completely consumed with the undeniable gut certainty that we're right in the middle of just such an event. Other people in my life are feeling the same way.

Closest to home, I'm frankly shocked to watch my own psyche at work, and to see how deep-rooted and involuntary my sense of creeped-outness over the Gulf has become. The thought/image of the oil and methane pouring up from the ocean floor in a volcanic eruption dogs me all day and night. You don't have to be Jung to realize that something big is afoot, that what's happening in the Gulf is as much archetypal and mythic as it is physical.

Which, again, is why I appreciate so strongly what you've written here. Best of luck to you and everybody.

--

Matt Cardin

www.mattcardin.com

www.demonmuse.com

beginning of the end

Thank-you Daniel for this courageous outcry. Prophets of doom are easily dismissed by those who need to heed them most. I too have recently experienced waking up in the middle of the night with a sense of deep dread, before and after the spill. I go to sleep thinking about this tragedy and wake up remembering it's not a bad dream. In the middle of my day I will think about the affected wildlife in the Gulf and start to cry. I am sinking into an unprecedented despair that goes beyond the circumstances of my own little life. A large canvas started many months ago sat neglected in my studio until last week when I was compelled to paint the globe, with the shape of North America looming like a large bird and the oil spiraling out from the Gulf up the east coast and across the Atlantic towards the British Isles. I know there have been many other oil spills and leaks in other parts of the world, but this one is different, occurring in the same location where the asteroid hit the earth that caused the last global extinction event, and the massive layer of life that was destroyed is now returning to the surface, signaling the beginning of the end of this cycle. Gaia bless us all.

Shall we have the courage...?

"Sri Aurobindo puts us on notice:

I am concerned with the earth, not with worlds beyond for their own sake; it is a terrestrial realisation that I seek and not a flight to distant summits. (26:124)

And so does Mother:

That's always a possibility -- to escape by going elsewhere. Many people have done it. They have gone elsewhere, into another, more or less subtle world. You see, there are millions of ways of escaping; there's only one way of staying, which is to have real courage and endurance, to accept all the appearance of infirmity, powerlessness, incomprehension -- the appearance of, yes, a negation of the Truth. But if one does not accept that, things will never change! As for those who want to remain great, luminous, strong, powerful, and so on and so forth, well, let them -- they can do nothing for the earth. (9/25/65)1

And this:

(Mother:) At times, one gets the feeling that there is an extraordinary secret to discover, and it's right here, almost at one's fingertips, and one is about to catch the Thing, to know. . . . Sometimes, for a second, one catches a glimpse of the Secret; there's an opening, and then it closes up again. Then, again, the veil is removed for a second, and one knows a little more. Yesterday the Secret was right there, completely clear, completely open. . . . And, well, I saw that secret; I saw that it is in earthly matter, on earth, that the Supreme becomes perfect. (6/5/60)

Reason

Hence the earth is our real focus of interest. It is a physical solution to the problem of the world that we seek. But our means of attaining it will be spiritual, directed inwardly, for they alone can touch the deeper causes of things, the true springs of the mechanism of life."

http://www.kheper.net/topics/Aurobindo/Life_Without_Death.html

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Volcano of Truth in Gulf

I have submitted my essay to Daniel and I hope he appreciates it and wants to publish it. It explains why this gulf disaster will create a truth movement that cannot b stopped. Its here if any would like to read it http://www.energybulletin.net/53251 Daniel, you and I seem to be tuned into some of the same avenues of understanding and I am pleased to see your site for first time. I'd like you to know that Ben Franklin, who "discovered" electricity, and Paramhansa Yogananda, who you site, and Dr. Steven Greer of the www.DisclosureProject.org and www.CSETI.org have something in common. I trust your intuition that you will connect the dots on this. Do not worry. Reality based on lies cannot survive. Reality based on truth and nature will survive. Keep up your great work and writing, and remember, there is no death, just endless rebirth. with love, Ray Songtree

hmm

If as has been visioned that we have

reached some kind of cycle cycle psychic wake up moment on this world, then everything will begin

to become like scenes from the movie The Fountain, the images of gushers must transform into

fountains of freed psychic Gaian memory, which is what the spiritual people on this planet have been pointing all along, only now it will bloom through the collective imagination, and be born from the wound of wounds, the opening of openings, the darkness in the ocean become like ink in the creators fountain pen.

Lets Face it....

Would everyone on this board be so concerned and worried about the implications of this if it hadn't happened in the Gulf of Mexico? The oil companies have been destroying the environment in the Niger Delta for years on an unprecedented scale, both in terms of pollution and in human suffering. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/30/oil-spills-nigeria-niger-del...

oil s p ill

I agree with all you prophets of doom: for the insanity inherent in the modern world to come back to reality there will need to be some massive crisis, most likely involving a lot of death. I think it's the only way that, as a species, we'll learn this lesson. I feel fairly powerless in the face of the inertia of the masses, but not I'm not hopeless either - I too feel that there is something bigger than all of us which "knows" what's going on here and has the best interests of life at heart, this is life itself and I think it needs creatures like us...

So I'm happy to be powerless in the hands of the universe, and trust I can play my part, and pray I get to see the sun's rays out the other side of the storm.

I also want to directly tackle this idea that "turn the other cheek" is some dominator-culture mechanism - that's only one interpretation of words that I don't think were ever really meant to be written down - another interpretation is that "turn the other cheek" is in fact the only way to break the cycle of violence that happens between people who have the old "eye for an eye" mentality...

My heart goes out to us all in times like these,
Wheel see,
x

A Relevant Link

I just thought those commenting might appreciate this article from GlobalResearch.ca - http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19873

As to this discussion, re-read Daniel's article a couple times. The man is a writer and by experiential necessity, you are exposed to the movements of his soul/mind/energy. He is pleading that we can somehow grow to be more conscientious: conscious aware attentive human beings, in my opinion, words that need integration into the individual and then collective psyche of our species. This simple action is paramount to our survival and the words don't have to travel with all the interpretive baggage they can sometimes carry.

Peace.

Wouldn't it disappointing...

If the Apocalypse doesn't turn up.

If the current 'transition stage' view of human development proves to be a historical and cultural fad

We say 'I really hope it (Disaster 'X') doesn't happen'

We say 'Do you think anyone in their right mind would want to wish such destruction on anyone?

I say - yes, we do secretly yearn for disaster. We want something to shake us out of the terrible boredom and predictability of post modern living. Out of the spiritual angst and the sense of moral apathy.

Secretly we want to see impersonally imposed, radical, uncontrolled change - forcing us to the brink, creating a revolution in society and in the individual.

Because we know, left to our own devices, we would find it impossible to rouse ourselves to real action.

So we look, in a perverse form of 'hope', to super volcanoes, tsunamis, cometary impacts, prophesy and solar flares as a means of galvanising us, making us do something.

Perhaps the real Apocalypse has to happen inside?

Perhaps we are externalising onto the world a deep inner necessity?

Perhaps because we lack the courage to initiate this process within ourselves, we seek such an agency of change without?

thank you

this is an extremely wise response. thank you for sharing your wisdom.

End of All Beginings

Sometimes it is just OK for things to end.

Are we ready to go "consciously"

  ... as there is virtually no "conscious" difference between being  "able to live here peacefully"  

... and being "able to leave here peacefully."

in-spire

We with open eyes are challenged to see the truth and be brave. Bravery to me includes continuing to follow your heart and open your mind. Continuing to develop your consciousness and expand your perspective - wider than the catastrophes - wider than extinction - wider than death... we might find that fear cannot exist in the present... that fear is the result of our getting ahead of ourselves... that there is no such thing as time... From here, we can choose the words and activities that feel right. They might be the ones that have the quickest, widest and most beneficial impact on those around us. They might be the ones most useful as time unfolds. We might not need to know. For practical information on how to expand the threshold of your parapsychic abilities, I highly recommend the International Academy of Consciousness. They have a center in midtown. In case you haven't already been introduced, I would hand you J. Krishnamurti's talks...

Why is a the loss of life

Why is a the loss of life considered "collateral damage"? Is it not the Trust between the people and the State which inducts the individual into that system of commerce and deposes them of any authority they once had? So by remaining in that system of commerce we're the chattel threw our birth certificates and collateralized threw the Department of Human Resources. They make certified copies and forward those birth certificates to the Department of Commerce in Washington, D.C. The Department of Commerce does the same thing: they make certified copies and forward them on to the International Monetary Fund. I'm all for deposing the corporate elite, but we can't do that when we have deposed ourselves first. Like when we endorse Fed Credit by signing the back of our paychecks or otherwise deposit with the Bank; whereby we depose ourselves of our equity and authority. In short, to stop being the collateral, we must stop being the chattel. "Seek not abroad, turn back into thyself, for in the inner man dwells the truth..."

how do you translate ideas into deeds

 hi absalom,

 fine words - but where is the tangible program in what you are proposing?  how do you see thie coming about and how do you work to make it come about? 

 in order to engage in transformation, you must first fully understand and accept the situation as it is now, and then find the access points that can be used strategically to make change. 

 otherwise, it is just empty words. 

 

"Will the transformation."-Rilke