Is God Expensive?
In my early 30s, my favorite uncle, Norbert, recognized that I was on a spiritual path, and in a moment of candor, confessed that when he was around 19 he used to hang out at the Ramakrishna Foundation, and later became deeply interested in the works of author Paul Brunton, who he had had the privilege of meeting. Brunton was a well-known disciple of Ramana Maharshi's, and my uncle had a full collection of Brunton's books. Even after Alzheimer's had begun its assault on Norbert's cognitive skills, he was often pulling Brunton books off the shelf to read aloud quotes about the mystery of the inner Self. His affinity for these matters was for a long time unknown to everyone in the family apart from his wife, my Aunt Karin, and was a real revelation to me, for I understood that even as a child, on some level I had recognized Norbert as a kindred spirit. Or more accurately, I could feel somehow that he had recognized me as a kindred spirit!
The only spiritual advice Norbert ever offered me over the years was surrounding the issue of money. A purist from the old school, he insisted that if anyone ever charged any money at all in exchange for spiritual teachings, I should run the other away as fast as possible. Thankfully, my two earliest teachers, Ram Dass and Hilda Charlton, never charged. But as for the rest of my career as a seeker...let's just say I've paid through the nose.
Uncle Norbert was not familiar with the sheer magnitude of commerce connected with contemporary spiritual pursuits, and I was reluctant to fill him in on all the teachers I had paid over the years, for surely he would have cast a leery and suspicious eye on all of them and doubted their motivations as well as my gullibility.
Nor had Norbert heard one of the popular, prevailing ideas of those times: money is simply "green energy," and like all energy, can be used for good or ill. And who better to use lots of money for good than one's revered spiritual teacher? The problem, of course, was that somehow that approach to spirituality and money matters also often involved Swiss bank accounts, offshore trusts, and ridiculously lavish lifestyles, perhaps symbolized most blatantly by former televangelist Jim Bakker's famous gold-plated toilet seat. Or else by Bhagwan ("Osho") Rajneesh's ninety-nine Rolls Royces, although in his defense, one of my heroes, Tom Robbins, insists that the cars were like a huge piece of performance art, and that Bhagwan was merely offering a mirror to and making a mockery of our extremely materialistic culture. (One does have to wonder, though, why he stopped at ninety-nine?)
One evening in the late ‘70s I attended an evening talk with Leonard Orr, the founder of Rebirthing. The price of admission was $50, but in return Leonard was promising to give people an idea that was worth many times that amount, an idea that could easily produce great riches. I revealed the idea in my book, The 99th Monkey, which costs $16.95, representing a savings of over 60%. And now here in Reality Sandwich, I'm giving it away absolutely free!
Here is Leonard's idea."My personal connection to Infinite Intelligence is sufficient to yield me a huge, personal fortune."
The funny thing is, I don't doubt the truth of that at all. Of course, if you speak to Job about it, he might further clarify that "Your personal connection to Infinite Intelligence is also sufficient to bring you to the absolute brink of ruin." Infinite Intelligence is very moody; It can go either way. But in the meantime, perhaps a reader can sell Leonard's affirmation on e-Bay:
"Invaluable Idea, Like New, Barely Used."
My friend Randy simply can't believe the kinds of things people will pay for, and keeps insisting that the two of us could easily create a religion with him as the charismatic leader and make a ton of money. He has already begun working on his fundamental teaching concerning the distinction between what he is calling "The Vertical Path" and "The Path Upward," and which one will cost more. I actually recognized the commercial possibilities of spiritual teachings one morning in the hot tubs at Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, where I was a group leader. I was commenting to my friend Daniel, a therapist, about how cooperative everyone was in Esalen workshops; as a leader, I could ask my groups to do virtually anything and they would jump right in and try it. On a lark, Daniel and I discussed creating a new therapy, in which participants would be instructed in squawking like a chicken. Students would also learn the theoretical basis behind the technique: how the flapping of the arms stimulates certain acupuncture meridians, and the contraction of the vocal chords while squawking clears out the 5th chakra. As we practiced a few times, within minutes several people from an adjoining tub approached us and asked us which workshop we were in, because they wanted to sign up. We had our first converts to CST™!
Last August, I walked into a bar at Burning Man, and in order to receive a drink, patrons were asked to roll a pair of dice, and the bartender would tell you what you had to do. The challenge assigned to me was, “Walk around the room squawking like a chicken.” Ha! I thought, they don’t know who they’re dealing with, the one guy in the room who not only has actually been squawking since way back, but has actually taught it! (The girl next to me rolled a lucky seven, she got to be publicly spanked at the bar.)
But apart from obvious and extreme forms of financial exploitation and indulgence, most of us these days don't think twice about the idea of paying a reasonable fee to someone for their time and services, spiritual teachers as well as anyone else, perhaps even more so.
On my recent book tour a single question kept repeatedly popping up in different cities, and always in response to my rattling off a humorous and unimaginably long list of the many different teachers, retreats, workshops, seminars, gurus, ashrams, and techniques I've experienced over the last 30+ years. The question was, "How were you able to afford to do all that?" And underlying the question was the implication, "If I could afford to do all that, I'd probably be enlightened by now."
My first answer was to remind the questioner of my Uncle Norbert's primary teaching: that God is free. Enlightenment is not for sale, spiritual truths are not a commodity, and awakening to one's true nature is not a buyer's market. In this spirit, many teachers in the contemporary American Buddhist world do their work for dana, which is the Pali word for generosity. Their teachings are offered freely, and people may choose to contribute to their support according to their own measure, for what is generous to some would be impossible to another.
My old friend Michael Freeman, founder and resident dharma instructor at Southwest Sangha near Silver City, New Mexico, has been a dana purist for well over twenty years, supporting himself entirely through voluntary contributions, whether it be for meditation instruction or a carpentry job. His insistence on this practice once caused a major anxiety attack in an intimate partner when she realized that not only did her man not have a regular paycheck coming in, but he sometimes received dana contributions in the form of a pair of handmade socks or homemade carrot cake. Both are lovely, heartfelt expressions of gratitude; neither can be applied towards rent and groceries.
To live one's life that way requires developing a deep trust in life itself, a knowing that one will be taken care of. Those of us who never step off that ledge will never find out if it's true or not, whether life will indeed support us. Indiana Jones illustrated this leap of faith perfectly in Raiders of the Lost Ark when he had to step out over an abyss, and it was only in stepping off the spot he was standing on that he released the latch on a platform that swung up to meet his next step.
I unwittingly happened upon this idea while hitchhiking across the UK in my early twenties. One Friday afternoon it dawned on me that I had run out of cash and the banks would be closed until the following Monday morning. Rather than panicking, I had already had enough remarkably generous hitchhiking experiences in the preceding days that I had developed an unshakeable trust, and I remember just knowing that things would work out and I'd find a bed to sleep in and a way to eat. Minutes later, a casual chat with a family on a beach led to my being invited to join them on their weekend holiday, all expenses covered. It felt like Grace.
In the last number of years, Rabbi David and Shoshana Cooper and I have experimented with bringing the spirit of dana to a Jewish context, for surely the idea of tzedakah, or charity, figures strongly in the Judeo-Christian culture as well. We began offering our twice-yearly 7-Day silent Jewish meditation retreats for dana, and discovered that we would receive as much and usually more than had we charged the usual per head tuition. There was a great difference in feeling, though, in that each envelope we received felt like a gift, and in addition, the process enabled those with limited funds to attend the retreat who would otherwise not be able to. My Uncle Norbert would like the idea.
When the people on my book tour asked me how I had been able to afford my extravagant spiritual seeker's lifestyle for so many years, I explained that I was fortunate enough to have been born into a situation where just enough money had been freely given to me so that I always enjoyed the luxury of living a rather frugal and modest hippie lifestyle while pretty much doing whatever I wanted. And as members of the Doughnuts will attest -- the Doughnuts being a philanthropic group composed of those suffering with the burden of great wealth thrust upon them, and all the mixed emotions, difficulties and strings that comes with it -- I always found my financial freedom either a blessing or a curse, depending on how well I was using it. I have always felt extremely driven to somehow justify my very existence through using what was gifted to me wisely and productively, something I didn't always succeed at doing, which would plunge me into states of great despair.
I once asked dharma teacher Christopher Titmuss about it, and he said, "When you can relate to the money in the same way that you relate to your hand, you will be free." Meaning, my hand was given to me this time around, and I don't have a problem with it, not a lot of guilt, shame or issues around having a hand. It was given to me, and I simply use it.
May God bless the work of my hands. And may that work be offered freely.
This post was offered freely. Dana contributions may be sent to the author using PayPal at eliezering@comcast.net. Eliezer Sobel is the author of The 99th Monkey: A Spiritual Journalist's Misadventures with Gurus,
Messiahs, Sex, Psychedelics and Other Consciousness-Raising Experiments
(http://www.the99thmonkey.com/).
"Wealth of Pennies" photo by r-z, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet
- 12-10-08
- Eliezer Sobel's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Lovely
As one of extremely limited funds, I myself have never been able to go to a retreat, workshop, etc. It has been a major point of frustration for me, as I hunger for community and shared experience in these deep matters as much as I do for air.
I try to be sympathetic...after all, I live in the same world, and more than understand the need for money to get by in society. Still, the process seems to put to lie the very truths learned.
Donation based teaching, however, I have no issues with. If someone is grateful for what you have given them, and wishes to give something in return (be it money or what-have-you), then you do them -- and yourself -- a disservice by not allowing them to gift you.
You probably would end up getting more money, as long as what you teach brings real results. I know there have been times that I purchased a book at $5.00 that informed me of a truth I would have paid $500 in gratitude for (if I had the means).
"You must *be* the change you wish to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi
How much for the apple?
Asking for cash in exchange for the fruits of any experience has always made me feel uncomfortable, so much so that I have never consciously done it, even though generous friends occasionally encourage me to do so.
There is a lucrative workshop circuit out there, for those with the will and strength of character to engage it; and I don't judge those necessary workers who choose to do so. To my mind however, its impossible to attribute monetary value to these things. I have pondered it - especially so as my home is currently heated with driftwood, and dull, timed labouring pays my rent and bills - but still I have no clue. What is it worth? Is it very valuable or not? To resort to Blake, "What is the price of experience? Do men buy it for a song? Or wisdom for a dance in the street? No, it is bought with the price of all the man hath, his house, his wife, his children."
I've never had surplus cash, so maybe I am just a bit fearful and superstitious of its effects. A conundurum.
That said, home made gifts of jam or bread or ale are always very welcome ;)
I have a feeling that these are going to be quite common questions in a year or two, if they are not already in some quarters. What are the relative values of meditation guidance, an afternoon of childcare, a dawn walk in autumn through the secret mushroom fields, help with a building project etc etc ?
edit: It might be a bit disingenuous of me if I didn't add that I bought a £1 lottery ticket today...haven't checked it yet, but I do hope I have won a million or two.
In wildness is the preservation of the world - Thoreau
The Word is Free
blems and oneoffs, halfoff?
was serious...
The Cost of Payment
"Judaeo-Christian"?
What does this mean?
If you are a Jew, you don't think Jesus is that voice that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob or Moses heard of followed.
If you are a 'Christian', you don't think that the Jews who lived after Jesus are 'saved'.
So I'm curious what this term "Jew-Christian" might mean.
I'm also curious to know what simple, frank "Christian" is supposed to mean from such who don't manifest the same or equal freedom from death and disease and moral depravity.
'I accept Jesus as my personal savior and repent of my sins' as a kind of blanket 'key' into salvation doesn't mean anything if one keeps on 'keeping on' like before.
I'm not even sure invoking the name of Jesus would be a sincere thing if one doesn't live by the same principle of that fair one.
And I judge him fair or just by just the extant record of his words. I don't even have to believe in his so-called 'miracles'. The words are good enough to judge, and in fact to judge by anything else is presumption.
An advocation of heart, of a principle of kindness and generosity and the concept of family love involved in the decalogue or 'ten commandments' or so-called "Mosaic Law", can be deemed just practical or common sense.
As long as we are a people infected with language or words that require self-consistancy or internal cohesion, I suppose we must have some element of 'authority' to impose upon us the idea that alteration of meaning must be not without 'sin'. But animals live by tone and posture and their form of 'restraint' or 'religion' is mostly just what we might call 'being parents' or reprodutive continuity.
We have reduced life to representational or iconographic forms. And in fact have allowed our so-called religious thinking to say: those with the most icons (read dollars) have the greater power. And those more virtuous who live with simple love and who judge wisdom from love are often deemed 'lower class' or 'servant class'. In fact they are reduced to 'slavery' because 'goodness' is not deemed as 'high'. What is deemed as 'high' is cleverness and 'savvy' and facility with politick and favortism of like-mindedness in wielding 'power'.
So in the mockery preserved in the words of Jesus about this, that the 'meek' would inherit the earth, since that would be only just and good and kind I have to laugh at the proud 'rich'. Whether it be monetary abundance or supposed 'wisdom' in the 'erudite' priestcraft.
I'm thinking that the so-called 'secrets' of both "Judaism" and "Yoga" or so-called 'direct transmission' of the 'secrets' of 'union' or 'God knowledge' as they exist today we actually have more information about a political force and a panicky, hysterical attitude derived from a mortal conviction or mortal philosophy.
What is strange about this, while we might run after temporal advantages, these advantages are extended into a vision of eternity or eternal likeness of things. So, in some way, I can see how evils are propogated because of a view of 'means to an end'.
People who are observant see those who treat present life as all there is, are mostly good. The political 'types' think a life or even hundreds, or thousands or even millions as a blip in respect to 'history' or 'ends'. And they have the wonderful insight to know what those 'ends' are and I suppose that keeps them from seeing what horrors they are the authors of.
We are taught by various means that such 'vision' is due to 'spiritual insight', and they can live with 'it'. The evils they induce.
And any mother or father or sister or brother or child of any stripe that curses these 'seers', their curses are 'ignorant' and not of 'God'.
When a one watches one most loved killed by this 'authority', how does that curse not count?
As long as a love exists between two or more, that I AM is in them. And if we cannot derive anything else from the records of the various scriptures, that does bear record and everyone will account for what they did until everyone can laugh and look back and say: that was silly. I for one think that is what 'I repent' means or what 'turning' means. After all, even God turned after listening to the pleading of Moses.
I take that as a record of internal reasoning. So Moses himself restrained himself from cursing in response to a tender place in his heart that thought: my kin can turn and be good.
That is also, I believe, an example of a pattern that automatically translates to the primary thesis here: we need not that any should teach us or charge us for self-knowing. We all know when we are being bad. When we are being good (GOD), we hardly think at all.
A 'problem' or 'the' problem induces this 'measuring' or 'weighing' or holding the 'balance' and the feeling of being at a 'cross-roads' and thus our 'difficulty' or being between a rock and a hard-place. The issue here seems to be a diversion of will against thought or the other way round.
Double-mindedness.
When two agree, touching on any one thing, it is done.
Otherwise, nothing gets done.
God proposes, mortal man disposes. How troublesome when the proposer is set aside as beyond mortal kin, and the dogma that one is mortal is the religion!
Unification of hope and practical or everyday actions is the 'work'. When we fight ourselves, how do we 'punish' ourselves? It would seem logical to reject a system of ideas or any character of will or affection that disallows such union. Or what?
Yes, God is free. But not if you can't see your very parents as God, or those who love you as God. And if you should so see parents or kindly folk as God and not see yourself as also God, you are right back to the slavery of differential thinking and all that that imbalance will entail. It's common sense. Disconnect kin from cause, and be a son or daughter of division.
And yes, the 'neighor' is God too, and kindness to the neighbors children is what might be called mutual love as the best form of 'government'. Who will curse one for being kind and just to ones' children? This is the very basis of equity law and commercial law as well. It is the breaking of such sincerity that lies at the basis of the failure of economies. Not just monetary economy, but biologic economy . . . including the failure of our body. When we restrict our love faculty, harden our hearts and stiffen our necks we curse ourselves far beyond what any other might wish to impose upon us fairly or unfairly.
A 'curse' in most cases is only that others understand what suffering they have induced and so repent or stop that. When we voluntarilly accede to some limited idea we have taken in or appropriated NO ONE ELSE or any outside force or kindness can remove it. WE HAVE ONLY ourselves to resort to to remove that kind of curse. I think this typical. And typically it is seen . . . and then laughed at. Nothing new there. Everybody, I think, knows all about this.
Merry day, merry week, merry month and merry year unto all years to ye. Merry Mass: all for one, one for all. All one. Why not?
======================
Art is the pinnacle of science.
I just made the best stoney treat. see recipe.
It may take a while before you even begin to figure out what I'm talking about.
So far tonight, I've been cleaning the kitchen, & doing the dishes. Talked to my Brother in Law on the phone. Talked to my Mom.
Played around with a cloud photo or two, & then fed the pescado's some algae wafers & some flakes. dropped some fizzing little anti-fungus antibiotic aquarium water greener 'er Er?
So, i jumped on here to drop a quick little recipe for the most awesome desert I just ravaged.
My Mrs. earlier chopped banana's & threw them into some vanilla pudding. I then proceeded to fill a 5" glass Ikea bowl (kid's breakfast size) fill bowl 2/3 of bowl.
then add one heaping handful of Planters Peanuts (with salt , although I wish the ones from Costco were slightly less salty, but who's complaining right?)
on top of the heaping pile of peanuts, on the gloppity glopped in Jello Pudding,
Then, get the squeeze bottle of chocolate sauce already in fridge for making kids hot cocoa's & chocomilkos.
Make the galaxy swirl from outside to in, from curb, to axis. Stop..
get whipped cream.
Swirl that decisious goo all on top of the yum fest below itself, piled high.
If I could improve it?
I'd maybe add some cinnamon powder on top, & maybe some crystallized honey crumbles & maybe, but not totally necessary some graham cracker crumbs.
that's sounding good yes??
That's my contribution to the Enlightenment Project this evening.
Cheers,
mabUS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_Tf2lQvDz0
Price tags?