Future Transcendence

Kurzeillp.jpg

Depending on what time of day it is, Ray Kurzweil could be one of many things -- inventor (he developed a machine that can scan words and read them aloud); musician (he designed the Kurzweil synthesizer, which has been used by the likes of Stevie Wonder and the Rolling Stones); clairovoyent (in the early 80's, he prophesized that a computer would defeat a man in Chess). But perhaps the title he is most apt to adopt is that of Futurist.

Futurism is essentially a way of thinking that concerns itself with the world of tomorrow, and how current trends in technology and society will affect it. Most Futurists today focus on technology's exponential growth, speculating that in forty or so years, we'll reach a Singularity, a point in time when machine intelligence is so advanced that it can improve upon itself without any human input, and our conciousness melds and expands with that unfolding technology.

Kurzweil and his Transhumanist beliefs recently premiered during NYC's Tribeca Film Festival in Transcendent Man, a film that focuses just as much on Ray Kurzweil the person as on his beliefs. While Kurzweil is indeed a brilliant man and prolific inventor, the movie still stresses the fact that he is indeed human.  The audience leaves with a palpable sense that Kurzweil's predictions are founded more in emotion than anything else, as the popular Futurist still laments the loss of his father (who died when Kurzweil was still a teenager) and fears death as "the end of innovation".

The film shows Kurzweil as a cheerful figure at the forefront of the Transhumanism movement.  While faced with the daunting possibilities of AI, Nanotechnology, Brain Augmentation, and even Bioterrorism, Kurzweil remains a smiling beacon of optimism throughout all his prophesizing. He recognizes the pitfalls just as much as he glorifies the potential benefits of a singularity, but argues that man has faced dire threats before, and his compassion and rationality has always made things turn out for the best.

Watch the trailer here.

Comments

Am I a robot? What if. . .Tell me, O' Connor!!!

I hate to be the naysayer, and I'm not trying to be here.

The one question I want to pose to the people involved in the idea of technological singularity is this: "Is it possible that the fevered push towards the emergence of AI is really just a sophisticated mask covering up the possibility that we still have not grasped the unthinkable depths within our own, human, psyches?"

I love the idea of technology. I like new gadgets and things that help make life more convenient. The idea of machines that "out-think" us feeble humans is a grand one. But is it one that needs our immediate attention? What if instead of grasping for exponential technological growth and computing capacity, we instead embrace our unknown possibilities as organic beings and structured our pursuits towards discovering what it is that we're capable of given the hardware we already have?

We can't even come close to replicating the nanotech that is Nature, and yet we are thinking that algorithmic computing power will lead us to vistas unimagined - as if we needed them as part of our inherent design.

Are we really just vehicles for the construction of AI, as unfounded theorists such as Terrence McKenna have claimed? Is our sole purpose as humans just to be the harbinger of an elite, technological species that will surpass anything we've ever done, only with none of that intangible "soul" we all so rave about?

While I think AI, transhumanism, etc is actually really fucking cool and not exactly a bad thing, what strikes me is the absolute lack of critical dialogue on the basic philosophical presumptions held by the Singularitarian community, and also the utter lack of outreach this community displays in terms of educating the apathetic masses to the wonders of technology.

Might I recommend Kurzweil taking a break in between his intake of life-extension apparati and give a shout out to KMO over at the C-Realm Podcast?

That seems to be a place Singularitarians fear to tread. . .

don't you hate this guy?

(I read most of his Singularity book, too)"...our conciousness melds and expands with that unfolding technology." sounds pretty psychedelic, but maybe interpreted a little too concretistically? basically, im not down with integration with technology on the neurological level, but taking a hovercar is fine for now. i think technology as our manifestation is distinct from us. technology that comes back from behind and traps you juggling cell phones and car parts is more like what he's talking about, a machine bent on expansion by drawing everything into it like a massive biological effort - but does the Buddha repose in this? it is a dream, a fantasy! the bubble bursts, and the Buddha is as if never left! I think it's pretty old school to stay analog.

It takes a thief to recognise a thief...

and the same can be said of fascists.

Jarod Lanier is wickedly Luddite, and his West Coast flavor of crunchy-granola utopia shows it.

If anyone can seriously support Jarod Lanier's wisdom after reading both pieces, we should talk.

 

The Outer Limits

Check it out...The Limits of Technology by Grady Booch http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/2082.html I got a bad vibe from watching the Transcedence Man trailer. We have to learn to live within our boundaries and accept the the truth that we have limits. 500 years ago not much changed in a century and 500 years ago there was no such thing as PCB's or nuclear waste. Technology has been great in the short-term but the long-term outlook doesn't look very good. The technology explosion Kuzweil is suggesting is a child playing with a loaded gun. We can live without new technology, what the world really needs is an explosion of  truth, justice, and compassion. It would be so nice if the gifted ones would stop and smell the roses.  

Heart in right place...but

Preaching to the converted here I am sure...but technology as a idea is neither good or bad. It is all about the consciousness that creates and implements it. The Ghost in the Machine, so to speak. In some ways we are not creating enough real cutting edge technology. I see the 20th century as a series of missed opportunities that could have created a truly technological utopia. But pure greed, and domination mindlessness kicked in. Tesla's work, and Henry Ford's car made out of and fueled by hemp are just two creations that would have gone a long way to have prevent the dystopian madness that is around. We have the capabilities to turn this around, but it will only happen when there is a top down and bottom up reawakening. We need a holy marriage of the masculine "Singularity" of one pointed innovative consciousness, with the Feminine qualities of love of the Earth and respect of , the unconscious, and the mystery of life,death and rebirth. We need heart , soul, empathy,compassion, to be programmed into the creation and implementation of what we have and are creating. We need the Goddess to take her place next to the God. I feel that Ray, is coming from a heart place in that he wants to prevent death of his loved ones. But that is the kicker, his fear of death, and denial of it is creating a soulless world. It seams to me he is only focused of the mind as consciousness. But what about the body as consciousness? I agree with ecolocal about the ignorance of males who get lost in the world of computers. I wonder what Kurzweil and his ilk would create if they spent time in the wilderness, worked out,danced, did yoga, listened to the ancient voices of wisdom, lived with people of the earth and connected with shamanistic practices? That would be amazing. The ( cosmic ) joke is if he did all that and if our leaders followed suit we would have more wealth and even greater innovations because we would access all of our god given gifts. It is still not too late for that to happen ...yet.

Otherwise we will continue along the path this new film depicts...


http://www.sleepdealer.com

One last thing...

You cannot trully Tracend what you have not Mastered.

And we have not yet mastered being trully biological human beings...you dig?

The distinction between the

The distinction between the sanctitiy of the carbon atom and the silicon atom is imaginary.

 

If you want to distinguish between matter-based life and energy-based life great....there is plenty to talk about there.... but matter is matter, no matter how many protons it contains.

Mastery

Who is to say that humans mastering being human is so far away? Who is to say someone has not yet done so? How can we know that when one has mastered being human, he/she will not share this knowledge? That knowledge will spread and it will spread fast. It is the thing missing in all of us. It is the thing that wakes most of us up. It brings us to our limits. It is why we are limited; we want to be more and more human. When we master being human, this could happen tomorrow, we will leap forward and we will dance, for a change. We are all striving to be more human. How do we know who is going about it the wrong way?

Embrace the Unknown

Radical new technologies will naturally hold the potential for destruction, but that is no reason to ignore them or supress them... that will just put the flame of possibility in the hands of outlaws, which could be much more dangerous. As Kurzweil advocates, we should have responsible, intelligent, and democratic exploration in these areas to determine the best way to proceed.

 

We need more light-minded individuals embracing these technologies... it's our best hope for evolving towards the highest octave.

History

Just keeps repeating itself. Take a good, long look at this war in the middle-east right now... Does that remind anyone except me of the crusades during the middle ages? As much as we'd like to think we are "transcending" to the next level of consciousness or whatever - we may just be spiraling out of control. In order to embrace ourselves 100% we must listen to our unconscious thoughts as well as our conscious ones! I really like the comment that Dante 69 made when he said "We need the Goddess to take her place next to the God." We as a species have needed this for centuries now. The feminin needs to come out of her shadow and embrace the masculine immediately.

Accelerando

Has anyone read Accelerando by Charles Stross? In narrative form (through a protagonist consciousness) it follows the course of civilization through 100 years post-singularity. Rather than focusing on the particulars of technology or science, the novel focusing on the accelerating rate of change itself. One of the particulars of a high rate of change is the inability of the human brain to process it; if we do not learn to manifest entities that think faster than we do then all of life on the planet will DIE. Does anyone seriously think Gaia wants that to be the end result of billions of years of effort? Read the story and discover why fears of the Singularity are... touchingly naive.

The Human Mind -- An Upgrade or Downgrade?

I know that one of the popular futurist projections is the uploading of human consciousness to computers (as a way of achieving immortality). The idea has been the subject of plenty of science-fiction books, films and animation. I always laugh though at the idea, not because it isn't plausible but because of the assumption that our uploaded consciousness will make full use of the hardware. After all, we haven't maximized the WetWare we have now. Putting a human mind into a computer would be a waste of the computer. www.sniffcode.com

Great postings here....

I have been doing some more thinking about this subject the last couple of days. What becomes clearer for me is "trans-human gadgets"could be useful. The idea of a "Singularity" as presented , is like a body builder only working out the biceps.

We need a full body/mind/spirit/lifeforce/love/compassion upgrade to really take us into the next quaternary leap of human development.