Support our Kickstarter

Falling Through the Looking Glass

zap1.jpg

Tubular Vision, Infinity Box (N0. 4), from the Awakened Vision series, 2012 by Matt Elson photographed at the Fractal Nation Art Gallery, Burning Man 2012

At about 330am (see Predawn Window Zone), just before awakening to resume work on my fantasy epic, Parallel Journeys, I had a dream about relating to the creative muse that used imagery and art from Burning Man. I am talking to Matt Elson who created these wonderful mirror boxes that were on display at the Fractal Nation art gallery dome.

Matt is only vaguely present (essentially I am talking to myself). We are out in the blazing sun looking at a mirror box sitting on the playa. It is long and rectangular and apparently completely sealed to keep out the elements. I tell him that this is too egoistic and that the mirror box should be open to the elements and have portals so that insects could enter it. The mirror box is reconceived so that it now has an open corridor.

Self-portrait in Infinity Box (N0. 3), from the Awakened Vision series, 2012 by Matt Elson photographed at the Fractal Nation Art Gallery, Burning Man 2012

Smash cut to next dream scene---

I am biking along the edge of a desert canyon that has steeply slopping sides descending about a hundred feet to a wide river. The sides are made of earth, rather than sheer rock, and there are occasional piñon trees growing out. My bike is heavily laden with stuff. I'm taking in the view, when the top-heavy bike, and I with it, slip and in slow motion fall into the canyon. In the last moment I have slid to the bottom of the canyon and am losing my grip trying to hold on to tree roots and rocks and am about to get swept into the current of the river.

As I interpret the dream, to really engage the creative process you cannot merely look through a sealed looking glass into an alternate reality, you must fall through the looking glass and allow yourself to be swept along by the current. Riding at the edge of the canyon, I am like a tourist having a "Kodak moment." I act as if I am looking at a picture, but a moment later I slip and find that no, I am in the picture and about to be immersed perilously into its swift current.

Parallel Journeys, more than anything else I work on, has to be like that. It is not just the characters who fall through the looking glass, but me as well. It is highly experimental writing and I don't know, and I'm not supposed to know, where it's going. Novelist E. L. Doctorow, who was my mentor at the NYU creative writing program years ago, once compared this sort of fiction writing to driving fast at night with your headlights. You can see only what's just up ahead.


Tubular Vision, Infinity Box (N0. 4), from the Awakened Vision series, 2012 by Matt Elson photographed at the Fractal Nation Art Gallery, Burning Man 2012

The creative process means allowing the boundary between subject and object to collapse. When I was doing my first shift of "vibe patrol" in the Fractal Nation art gallery, I saw that people were touching the mirror boxes and sticking their heads right into them which was smearing the mirrors. I found myself busily asking people not to touch the artwork, but it seemed hopeless, the mirror boxes seemed to draw people into them physically and cognitively. In a little while Matt came by and told me that I didn't need to keep people from touching them, that actually they were specifically made for people to stick their heads into them.

Burning Man 2012, dinosaur skeleton art car in the distance

The dream begins at Burning Man,  which is an artistic, quasi temporary autonomous zone where subjects and objects collapse boundaries. For example, an art car is not merely an object you look at like an object d'art behind glass in a museum, but something that may draw you into it and carry you across the technicolor desert.

It may also be something that you conceive of and make to share with others. Those who go to Burning Man as tourists miss the point. You haven't really experienced Burning Man unless you are willing to fall through the looking glass and get swept into the swiftly moving currents of the high desert night.

As artist, or as engaged percipient of art, the subject/object boundary must collapse, and you must fall through the looking glass.


A live, collaborative mural being painted at Burning Man, 2012

 

Tyler Freele painting at Area 51, Burning Man 2012

 

Self-portrait under the Fractal Nation parachute tent. Matt Elson is lying in the foreground. His son, Garth, is sitting up.

One morning, under the Fractal Nation parachute tent, I wrote a little amateurish poem in rhyming couplets (but few other metrical considerations, I'm not a poet) about Burning Man:

Harlequin, Harlequin Burning Bright

Harlequin, Harlequin burning bright,


Following techno currents in the night.

Did you ever find your heart's desire?

Or did it burn up with the Man, atop a 60,000 person pyre?

What strange currents drove you through the pyrotechnic haze?

Was it merely the same old same old same old golden oldie craze?

Was it merely sex, drugs and rock n' roll?


Faux fur and steampunk goggles adorning the same old troll?

Or was it an urge toward new provisions?

An urge to see the desert night enchanted with nocturnal visions?

What was it about the desert carnival invitation that made me feel I must?

What was it that I saw shimmering and sparkling in the dust?

About eleven months before I had the above dream, I had another dream that involved optics and subject/object collapse. It concerns a key paradox of creativity--the deeper in you go, the further out you often reach. I wrote about this dream in The Path of the Numinous--Living and Working with the Creative Muse. Here is the excerpt:


July 27, 2011 Early this morning I had an interesting dream related to the muse. In a somewhat chaotic situation where anomalous, almost apocalyptic weather is occurring, I am working on some sort of performance art piece. The art piece involves viewers looking down a shaft, partly created by optical illusions, at a person sitting at a table far below. The person at the table is in a state of subterranean isolation and I think of naming the performance art piece after the Dostoevsky novella, Notes from Underground. As I play with the optical illusions necessary to create the perception of the long shaft I am in a  subject/object reversal state as I experience myself as both the viewer and as the man from underground sitting at a table at the bottom of the shaft.

Many aspects of this dream relate it to the creative muse. Beside the obvious, that it involves a performance art piece, there is also the connection to the novella Notes from Underground that has already been discussed in this essay--the encounter with the muse in the form of a voice from a clock radio in the middle of the night when I was fourteen.

When I was designing the performance piece in the dream, I was well aware of my artistic intent. I was trying to make a statement that the artist must be a man from underground, must accept subterranean isolation in the depths, but that, paradoxically, from this intense isolation the artist can create things of universal import and of great interest to others. In the dream I am in the classic position of the artist as both performer and observer and am aware that I am creating optical illusions, that what seems like a shaft revealing a person in deep isolation is also a projection, a creative intrusion into the outer world of an artistic statement. For example, if we envision Dostoevsky alone in his garret writing Notes from Underground in isolation at night, pages and pen illuminated by the flickering light of a kerosene lamp, it's like looking down a shaft, seeing a person in the depths of isolated creation. But then if we shift our focus to view the present readers of Dostoevsky, we see, for example,  young college students, 130 years after Dostoevsky's death holding battered paper back copies of Notes from Underground and reading them with rapt attention. Our expanded view reveals that what looked like a shaft descending into total isolation was actually more like a light house, a beam of light, a telepathic artifact made in the 19th Century that is still glowing in the minds of myriad people in the 21st Century. If we can hold these two views in our minds we see the paradox of creation--that what seems like an isolated tunneling into the depths of our being can also be a telepathic broadcast into the minds of others, a broadcast that can transcend our life span. The optical illusion of isolation when we tunnel inward has never been more illusory than in the internet era.

I woke up before dawn this morning to write about a dream I just had. If you were to project a shaft of remote viewing into the ceiling of my room right now, you would see the 21st Century equivalent of the 19th Century garret, an obsessed looking middle-aged guy leaning forward in his chair, shaved head illuminated by a computer monitor, listening to Pink Floyd Echoes and typing on a wireless keyboard. Another image of man underground, working in total isolation. But then, with a few mouse clicks, I post what I've written to my website and send it out as a newsletter to a thousand subscribers. From the bottom of the shaft a beacon of zeros and ones has shot out at near light speed and a thousand emails are appearing in email accounts to people who are mostly in other time zones. My predawn is evening for a subscriber in Australia opening the email and reading what I just wrote. The old art form of writing melds with cybertech to create a telepathy as the Australian scans what a few seconds ago were my private thoughts. If you expand your remote view to include all readers and subscribers, and this would have to include you reading this right now, you see that what seemed this solitary ritual is actually a mass telepathic event, one psyche interfacing, time displaced, with many others. 

All art is the exteriorized artifacts of individual psyches. These exteriorizations, if they are done well, create parallel intrapsychic experiences in those who perceive the art. Thanks to the internet, this inward/outward telepathic paradox is now available to almost all of us.

The context of the dream reinforces this paradox. I hadn't been thinking much about this essay, but Joe, a new friend, a young poet in a graduate writing program who lives in the same building as I do, told me on the phone the previous evening that he was reading The Path of the Numinous, and listening to the podcast with great interest and wanted to talk to me about it. We arranged to meet up the following evening. This social transaction happened just before I went to sleep.

In the dream, I am in solitude creating this art piece that has an image of deep isolation, but the dream itself seemed to be seeded by a social transaction. Joe's numinous interest in the essay, which I hadn't been thinking about at all, seemed to inject vitality into the subject and catalyzed the dream. This social context adds a layer of parallel meaning. We create in what seems like the depth of solitude, but actually, as I discuss in a recent essay, Pushing the Envelope--Boundary Expansion into Novelty in Personal and Evolutionary Contexts, there are many social contexts to solitary creation. What we create in isolated depth can be broadcast into the collective and become a maximal case of our psyche interfacing with others. But another social aspect of creativity is revealed by the context of the dream. The numinous interests of other creative people can catalyze creative synergies. All human creativity has a social context.  If it were not for the influence of other artists and creative people we would not even be ourselves. For this reason it is very important that we creative people find community with other creative people so that we can tap into the serendipitous synergies that arise when minds on parallel wavelengths converge.

The dream also had some connections to the Singularity Archetype (see my book, Crossing the Event Horizon--The Singularity Archetype and Human Metamorphosis). Outside the building where I was creating the performance art piece,  there was anomalous weather that seemed almost apocalyptic, an inexplicable form of precipitation that seemed explosive. My response to the apocalyptic weather was to access the inward/outward telepathic paradox of art. This process is at the cutting edge of evolution, and Pushing the Envelope---Boundary Expansion into Novelty in Personal and Evolutionary Contexts expands this theme and is, I now realize, a sequel to this essay. Terence McKenna, my late colleague, when talking about what we should do during this critical phase of human evolution said, "Push the art pedal to the metal."

For more on the creative process see The Path of the Numinous--Living and Working with the Creative Muse.

For more on Burning Man see Incendiary Person in the High Desert Carnival.

Mirror self-portrait wearing free dream interpretation sign at the border between Fractal Nation and Area 21, Burning Man 2012


Text and photos copyright Jonathan Zap, 2012

Comments

Creative necessity

Thank you Jonathan... This piece touches on several vital points for artists in any medium. Two of the most vital are the necessity for isolation... (not always easy as you mentioned, in our connected world) and appreciation for and an understanding of the necessity of the paradoxical view.

 Isolation is not always chosen... sometimes it comes as a result of "failure"... and the fighting against the acceptance of "failure" and "setbacks" is part of the process but it must be eventually overcome... and there is no better way to overcome... than to create. Creativity transmutes the energy of "failure" into the energy of awareness... which is the ultimate paradoxical reward for the artist.

Artists are "transmuters"... if they are anything.

 Transmutation requires energy... any energy will do... but the energy of deep emotion is custom made for artists because its impossible to avoid it... so if an artist is lucky they will run out of reasons to avoid it.. and that is often seen as "failure"... or 'setbacks'... or isolation.

 Subject-object transcendence is ultimately the point of view of 3rd party awareness... detached awareness. But this awareness can come in varying degrees to artists "in process" depending on where the artists is in relation to the process so in its early stages the artist may not even appreciate what is happening till the process reaches 'fruition'. But 'detachment' from the process is a must and as such... in my opinion... the creative process is a legitimate 'spiritual' path... even if the artist is not aware of such at first... because only detachment leads to greater detachment... and if the artist completes the "project"... so to speak... the rewards will be obvious... and perhaps unexpected.

 Transmutation and detachment is the path of the artist.

 Reporters report what happened... artists report what they 'see'. the difference is in the 'seeing'.

 

PS - The 'Looking Glass' can be seen as a metaphor for the process of letting go of the attachment to the 'personal self'.  So 'entering' the Looking Glass can be seen as the willingness and ability to let go of attachment to the personal self in the process of creating.  This 'exposes' undefined being or awareness which is not subject to personal limitations... thus the creativity is 'allowed' to 'happen'. 

  So if the artist is able to do this repeatedly... detachment will develop naturally as all detachment is detachment from the personal... there are no 'impersonal' attachments. 

  Thus this 'repeated' detachment is a repeatable spiritual 'practice'... through the 'practice' of creativity... so to speak.

 

 

Fantasy is an essential part

Fantasy is an essential part of our thinking. It is imagination in its extremes and shows how far our minds can stretch beyond the normal and the natural. All creativity has an element of fantasy as when an artist paints a nude figure or a poet dreams of a perfect world, even reality itself seems to take on some sort of fantastic or slightly exaggerated form. bon reduction pixmania

dynamic paradoxes and creativity

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com Subjet/object dissolution is not necessarily a function of detachment as it is a transcendence in egocentrism. It can be a type of full immersion and engagement like love-making in which the sense of whose body is whose becomes blurred by extreme intimacy. I guess we could speak of cool and hot subject/object dissolution, one may come from passionate engagement where the object becomes a subject as we are a subject and we get subject-subject merger. In another case one zooms out and expands the frame to somewhat objectify oneself and see the whole creative process including our own ego from a detached perspective. This suggests that these two poles are part of a dynamic paradox. In my philosophy, Dynamic Pardoxicalism, http://www.zaporacle.com/dynamic-paradoxicalism-the-anti-ism-ism/ , third party type transcendance is one of the ways of relating to a paradox, but often not the best choice. Often there is more vitality to be found at one or the other end of the spectrum. The dynamic paradoxicalist, however, avoids getting stuck at a pole or at a third party transcendence as that would be undynamic, stagnant and absolutist.

Thanks for the reply Jonathan

Thanks Jonathan... that's an interesting reply.   The issue with 'hot' subject-object dissolution is it has too many subjective moving parts and is impossible to maintain... but it is a valid learning-unlearning experience... just not a final solution... as all spiritual experiences are meant, in the long run, to merely inspire and motivate the 'person' to look past its self... to it's Self.

  In order to do that reliably the individual needs to be able to see past the background assumption of a separate 'person' and be comfortable with their native undefined being or awareness.  When that is 'practicable' (if thats a word) and repeatable under more varied and everyday circumstances its more likely to provide reliable long term progress.  Practice under pressure is the most desirable arena of practice as it is the 'stuff' of ordinary life.  We are all under unrelenting pressure (to varying degrees) in our ordinary lives - at least thats my experience - so this is the most fertile field of practice.  It's what yoga and chi-gung martial arts (like the Ba-Gua martial art) are designed to emulate - practice under pressure to help avoid adrenal over-reactions by transmuting that energy into energy that allows for appropriate aware responses.

 Paradox can be maintained by resolving the 'personal-impersonal' dilemma... as in 'understanding the personal dilemma from the standpoint of impersonal being' or awareness.  From this 'view' the individual is able to 'see' past it's 'personal' limitations... instead of giving them unconscious "feedback"... which amplifies them.

 I believe there is an assumption out there that detachment is 'non-engaged' in life and thus somehow not 'of life'... thus unrealistic or impractical at times.  I would submit the opposite is true... that detachment reveals reality... gives the seeker an 'edge' over life... by not falling 'prey' to lifes 'rat holes' of attention... while being perfectly compatible with our emotionality and our humanity.   Thus detachment practiced 'realisticly' is fully compatible with human life... including the 'hot & cool' episodes of human life... which 'come and go'... so to speak.

 BTW... there is an interesting explanation for the two somewhat divergent views presented here and that can be found in astrology.  Neptune is a highly 'spiritualized' planet associated with 'dissolving'... as in the dissolving of boundaries.   Mars is associated with assertion, will and yoga.  So if a reader finds themselves resonating strongly with one view or the other they might want to consult their natal chart.  Chances are they will find either a promanant Neptune or Mars in the first house... or in some sort of meaningful position.   Just a thought.

Robert, a Serious - NEPTUNE - Query

Robert states Neptune is a highly spiritualised planet. You wish, you hope, you decided this?  Neptune is a symbol for possible archetypal interpretation within the language of astrology for useful multiple meanings.

Serendipitous flows from synchronous breath of Neptune's dalliance, who knows? Neptune is dipping its toes into a 1st degree of Pisces right now. Will there be seas of potential poison or medicine for the next few years 2011- 2026 ?  Who's to know?   

Bertolucci's  film,  'Il Conformista' is a version of Plato's cave at the back of the mind which reflects on screen, archetypal glamour of a 1930's style Facism.  "Isms" are a Neptunian affair and Facism is the epitome of ideological 'Neptunian conformity', yes conformity spreading its sticky contagious disease everywhere!  Paradoxical, yes?

Neptune's placings do always fascinate - notorious for treachery and lies, projected as imagined virtue with the usual deluded spiritual detachment, attached.  Dissolved from all the shadows on Plato's wall, an icy arctic-cold Neptune sticks its sharp & barbarous shards into the backs of blinded acolytes and disciples with detached impunity for their unrealistic detachment goals.

Neptune's roads are paved with a Nazi past lived out by the angel of death, Mengele, Sun Pisces grand trine Neptune trine Jupiter....Adolf Eichman Sun Pisces wrapped up in self-centred Neptunian vision seeing nothing else.  Both cosmically incapable of empathy!  Cecil Rhodes, meglomaniacal nastiness had Neptune on the point of a T-square to Mars, Nth Node & Jupiter. Hitler supported his ideas and the list is endless. They are all lost in heady chilling visions of Neptunian rascist brutality. Medical Nazism is Neptune cutting through humanity without feeling!

Today's disciples of frozen Neptune are Richard Dawkins, 4 points in Pisces opposite Neptune and dare we mention Ken Wilbur whose icy Moon Pisces in high focus to a Neptune yod also gets the nod. People with no empathy but a freezing Neptune, which can be the greatest of deceivers.       

Hey-ho for Mars the warrior who at least knows how to put up a fight, not flight in fright! Pluto is more the symbol of transformational states for freeing. An archetype most humans love to hate.  


re

Every planets energy is manifested in a range of responses from the lower, reactive and unconscious to the conscious response which makes lemon aide out of lemons.  Pluto in Capricorn is a good example.  It has reeked havok on many lives including my own yet despite the personal losses it's possible, in the end,  to be looking at a net gain so to speak.  The difference between self destructing and a net gain from a transit is in learning how to transmute its energies into the energy of awareness.  If you have gained awareness from a transit then its always percieved as a 'net gain' by the individual despite the appearance of losses.

 Transmutation Is transformation.   Master that one practice and you will always make a net gain from any transit.

Hot Subject Object Dissolution and Art

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com Although you might be able to make a developmental case for transcending the hot type of subject/object dissolution, you also must acknowledge how much of the great art humans have created has been done in this state. If we took away all the art that used this state we would be staggered by the loss. Many scientific discoveries, at certain critical phases of novel insight, have involved this state. Highly developed artists may be able to pull back from this state and in a more disengaged, transcendent state make adjustments and add fine shadings and so forth, but the glowing embers at the center of the artistic radiance probably came from states of abandon where they allowed themselves to descend/ascend into hot subject/object dissolution.

re

I would say that is a point well taken.  I see it in terms of subjective art vs objective art.  One is a transmutation through the expression of our internal state and the other is a manifestation of the universal principals as a reminder to ourselves of our inner direction in life.    One is a contribution towards pointing out the problem and one points directly at the solution.   One is 'The Scream' and the other is a Cathedral or the Sphinx. 

 Both are examples of art as a service to society.

 All planets have artistic potential IMO.  Even Saturn and Pluto give us the energy to work hard at our creativity and the power to overcome obstacles... which any artist will tell you is essential as this modern world in particular is not sympathetic to their mission... which is to inform and inspire us. 

Neptunology

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com Fascinating astrological comments Jupiter Moon. Wish I knew more astrology. I'm going to pass your comments along to my friend Rob Brezsny because I know he will find them interesting.

Oracles, Astrology, Creativity

Jonathon hello and thank you. You have your magic Zap Oracle for archetypal exploration of surprise and creativity enhanced with 'Neptunian' photography.  

Replying to Robert concerned what is painfully obvious to most astrologers. People seeking spiritual experience cannot bear to think of archetypal Neptune in less than 'ideal' terms as it can be an exceedingly glamorous garment to wear and many do. It is very human....but misunderstood can have suicidal conclusions.

Facing the issue of Neptune infatuation within oneself is almost unbearable. It destroys an insatiable need to be seduced, 'captivated' by an IDEAL or a person and the 'alienation' which follows while wobbling on and off the pedestal. The very hardest part. Aspiration or inspiration is a question often asked of Neptune's riddling archetypes. People confess a litany of shaded Neptune desirousness to be kept safe within astrologers' alchemical dens. The learning has always been mutually creatively and gratefully beneficial.

A comment

Clearly outer planets can have disruptive and disturbing consequences for an unconsciou society. On an individual level though I would submit that they are called the 'transpersonal planets' for a reason. Transpersonal means to transcend the personal'. As such they are ultimately a friend to that which is beyond the personal... IE impersonal awareness.Truly we all have to be warry on a personal level of the disruptive aspects of any outer planet transit but to ignore its impersonal  potential is to sell our Selves short and to miss its ultimate lesson.  

 But for the sake of this discussion I would suggest that we not get 'rat holed' too deeply on the subject of astrology as my initial comment was meant to be merely as an aside.

 

Just a note of clarification on the topic of detachment. Detachment is not generally experienced as total 3rd party detachment by most seekers but in varying degrees depending on the individuals level of development. But any amount of detachment... even as an 'after action' reflection is a plus to the seeker IMO.  Detachment puts everything in its proper perspective so we can respond to life appropriately... detachment is detachment from the 'personal'... not from our humanity.   Big difference.   IE: undefined being isn't in and of its 'Self' 'human'... but this detachment does not affect our inate obligation to honor our humanity.  That remains understood.

 Also, there is a qualitative difference between the individual who strides the paradoxical personal dilemma with impersonal awareness and an individual who is 'indifferent' to suffering.  One is more akin to what we might think of as 'tough understanding' from an impersonal standpoint and the other is a personal dysfunction.

 This 'understanding' is understanding the 'personal dilemma' from the standpoint of impersonal being or awareness.  IE - they honor the personal side of life while simultaneously being aware of awareness or being.   So these individuals are living two simultaneous lives... one personal... one impersonal.   So they always honor others personal dilemmas as well and are not indifferent to suffering as they understand their own personal suffering as well.

 So the individual who is practicing detachment is always aware of and sympathetic to the suffering of others as well as their own... its just that their own suffering is in its proper place... IE it's not all there is to their life at any one moment... as their life is overshaddowed by being or awareness... which puts everything in its proper perspective.  

 

Pagan, turbulent Currents of La Luna

Full & fertile PAGAN Moons fall on Celtic Summer Isles in Spring. Taurus, venusian Moon of earthy feminine, adored companion to 'hades' Scorpio Sun, watery cleanser of deepest toxins, taking 2 to tango. Symbolic potent natural bathing. A circle-lit feminine fruiting in deepest waters of passionate immersion within destruction to new becoming. An intimate gaze of connection to an ecstatic Sun Moon dance known, long aeons past. Goddess of Love's rejoicing melts un-knowingness into tremors - shivers of feeling bliss. Sacred - Profane joined in ancient wisdom's sweetest kiss - just as she likes it.

I'm Passionate About Detachment

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com The title is meant as a joke, of course. With many things, even most things, a degree of detachment is helpful. My main point is that with some artistic projects, like fantasy writing, intense, personal engagement may be a necessary phase while you also need to zoom out into a detached perspective while editing. Often I'm encouraging people to make detached, tactically wise choices. For example, here is what I just posted as a status update on my two facebook pages: Elections are about consequential choices between usually non ideal possibilities. Much of our lives are about consequential choices between non ideal possibilities. For example, I could have a dinner of steamed organic veggies and quinoa or Kentucky Fried Chicken. The steamed organic veggies and quinoa will still have traces of pesticides that are run-off from nearby farms. Whichever dinner I eat I will eventually die anyway. Choosing the KFC on a regular basis, however, means that I will likely die sooner and have more unpleasant life along the way. Voting for Obama will not solve all our problems or even mean that life in this country will be better in four years. No one is in control of the boiling cauldron of wildcard variables. Voting for Obama does not mean that you agree with everything he has done. If I ever had a chance to speak to Obama, within the first five mintues I would give him shit for appointing Michael Taylor, of Monsanto infamy, as our food safety czar. I did not send in my mail in ballot for Obama because I think he is an ideal choice, but because he is the tactically wiser choice. Voting for Obama is a tactically wiser choice than voting for some more ideal third party candidate with no chance of winning. Careening toward us throughout our lives are choice scenarios that involve nonideal possibilites. You are driving along at night and see that a large, swerving Cadillac is speeding on the wrong side of the road, your side of the road, straight toward you. On the other side of the road there are oil spots and loose gravel, but survivable space. Neither choice is ideal, but compared to the headon collision with the speeding Cadillac, the tactical choice is easy. Romney is like a speeding, swerving Cadillac heading straight for you. If you can avoid it, you won't solve all your problems, but you will be much than if you passively allow it to hit you. Make the tactically wise non ideal choice and vote for Obama. Not voting because you don't like either cannidate is a choice to become Romney Cadillac road kill.

re

I agree that detachment is a tactical practice at first... IE practiced as needed and to the degree possible.   Rarely does anyone just 'detach' spontaneously and stay detached (Eckhart Tolle?) so its a tactical practice at first. 

 In my case with my art (writing) I detach when it's needed to 'report' from a more intuitive and spontaneous perspective... and focus deeply at times on editing details when its not needed.  This is being flexible and practical.   So flexibility of mind combined with an abilty to detach when necessary are whats required to create.   Continuous 3rd party detachment is the reward for sustained Self Mastery... or the 'fortunate' ones like Eckhart.  And in my opinion that takes sustained isolation to focus deeply on practice (although there are obviously exceptions to that 'rule' too) or sustained practice in ordinary life over time.

 So the artist IMO is one who is flexible... has the ability to focus deeply on details or detach when needed.  

 So the 'practice'... the progression... is for the artist to learn to detach and engage on demand.   This going 'back and forth' is exercising the 'muscles' of detachment if you will... or detachment 'muscle memory'... so to speak.

 Eventually it gets easier and easier and more and more sustainable for longer periods of time.  But we never lose the ability to focus on details to some degree (IMO) as life is always there to demand our attention.

 Sooner or later we'll be able to detach on demand even when not in the process of creating art... once you get the hang of it.  Then you'll find that you can detach when needed in the midst of pressure filled daily life to some degree and that is when the individual gains confidence in the practice that its sustainable and a realistic practice.

 So at this point the practice of art begins to serve our life and as we detach in more and more circumstances it can become more and more of a spontaneous thing... where detachment, art, editing or whatever are a seamless progression. 

 BTW... I would agree that intensly personal reports (as in writing) or art are not necessarily desirable areas for detachment in the creative process (although it can be done) and that to delve into the emotion of it temporarily for arts sake is not a 'problem' for a flexible artist.  

 The 'impersonal' is not devoid of the personal... it merely puts the 'personal' in proper perspective... and art is obviously an excellent venue for personal experience to be expressed... puts it to good 'use'... 

Grounding the Dialogue

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com I think our positions are pretty close, but for the sake of readers I'd like to ground it in a particular example and you can tell me if this works with your perspective. A writer is writing a scene that involves a highly emotional encounter between two characters. He allows himself to merge emotionally with the character's emotions and plays music during the writing session to intensify feelings. In this state he roughs out the whole scene and all the dialogue. He writes the scene, in other words, with subject/object dissolution, and high emotional engagement. Apparently, Charles Dickens wrote this way and people would sometimes hear what sounded like a loud, very tense argument involving multiple people coming from his writing room. It was Charles, who was a consumate actor, acting out all the characters. The writer becomes a shape-shifting method actor becoming each character and seeing the world from inside of them. In http://www.zaporacle.com/pushing-the-envelope-boundary-expansion-into-no... I talk about this kind of fiction writing: It’s become almost a cliche for fiction writers to say that their characters took on a life of their own and began to express their separate wills and agendas. Some authors have described characters whose actions seemed other and unpredictable, and sometimes even at cross-purposes to their presumed creator’s conscious intentions. I’ve had experiences with imaginal sub-creation that felt deeply interpersonal—a charged and unpredictable social context. Besides the encounter with what I experienced as autonomous entities, I have also journeyed into alternate realities that were visually, physically and emotionally potent. Many of the most intense and vivid episodes of my life have occurred in the imaginal realm. This is true even though my regular life, whatever other deficiencies it might have, has certainly not been lacking in vivid intensity. So, unless myself and all those other writers are straight-up liars, we must recognize a very significant and distinct type of human experience. Multiple personality disorder is a very rare condition, but the fact that it occurs at all tells us something about the human envelope. More than one personality/identity can arise in a psyche contained in a single human body. Your psyche has the ability to generate other personalities and whole worlds and timelines. That isn’t hopeful conjecture, it is what you do every night in the dreamtime. Other mammals also dream, but our sub-creative abilities make us the pinnacle of mammals. (end of excerpt) So writing from other personalities is a state of total nondetachment and involves boundary dissolution and subject/subject merging. The following morning, however, the same writer has a "cold light of morning" revision of the material. The music is off, the merging with other characters is off. His perspective on this morning is one of cool detachment. He recognizes the validity of what occurred the previous morning but now his perspective is: "What's actually on the page for the reader?" The music he played the day before may have filled in mood that is not actually on the page. He is also going through sentence-by-sentence to look for clumsy constructions and awkward diction and so forth. Each of the two writing sessions is crucial, but serve dramatically different functions and require dramatically different states of merged engagement and clinical detachment.

RE

 Wow... that's alot to digest but I'll try and cover it all but not necessarily in the same order as you wrote it.

 First thing that pops into mind is that in my opinion, separation is a "mass multiple 'person' disorder" in nature... a Macro example in the population at large of the micro examples we read about in the minds of individuals.  IE 'Mind at Large' separates into 'multiple separate personalities' or, more accurately... multiple separate 'persons'. 

 Once you have that dynamic in place then everything else you wrote makes perfect sense.   Actors are natural 'detachers' (if that is a word) in my opinion... at least the good ones... the 'natural' and flexible ones... the ones that can play many roles naturally.   So people like Dickens are acting on an intuition and a lack of attachment to their core 'separate person'.   This lack of attachment to the 'core person' is what enables them to 'migrate' their center of gravity into other 'cores' without the pathology of the classic 'multiple'.   Its actually a sign (IMO) of a flexible non-attachment in the creative individual and an asset rather than an illness.  But don't tell a 'Shrink' that!  :)

 So I do believe good writers (Dickens!) have this similar trait to good actors but I have not written 'dialog' so far so that's just an intuition on my part... but probably an accurate one.   I'll keep that in my 'pocket' if I ever do have to write dialog... thanks.

 To me this ability to detach mimics one very simple approach to detaching from the 'person' that I employ from time to time.   To detach in a pinch all I need do is to contemplate that the 'person' is only an assumption... not a fact of existence... an assumption that can be 'let go'.  So when I let the assumption 'go' in my mind that I am this 'person' I play... all of a sudden... there 'I am'.   The personality is not negated... in fact it sharpens it.  And this 'lack' of a 'personal assumption' has no impact on my humanity as that doesn't 'go' anywhere... but some assume that and thus detachment has gotten a bad 'rap' in certain minds as if being 'impersonal' is somehow 'inhuman'... like Spock.  

 Being is perfectly compatible with our humanity... but being 'only' a separate 'person' is optional... IMO.   So if you're going to study separation it helps to know exactly 'when' separation occurs.  Then the 'problem' of separation becomes a 'workable' situation... IMO... and an asset for actors and writers and other creative types.

 Separation is just an assumption we are a 'separate' person.

 When that assumption is dropped, 'that' which is left is both 'individual' and 'continuous'... Big difference.   Being 'individual' and 'continuous'... simultaneously... is a paradox.

 

 As far as Journeys are concerned, that... IMO... opens the flood gates on this ability to migrate and create... by 'dissolving' the core 'hook' that attaches the individual to the core person in a way that is not necessarily under their full control... because it dissolves something 'else' too.  Thus the predictable 'unpredictable' effects.  At least that's my "opinion".   I am not a shaman... but I've relied on them and their journeys, in the past for many years for healing purposes.

 

PS... I added an addendum to my comment above about how we don't detach from our humanity as this is a tricky topic.  While undefined being is not technically 'human'... 'it' intuitively understands that we have an obligation to honor this humanity.   And 'it' has no 'problem' with that.  You could even say it's excited about that.  So while you could make a case that we do in fact detach from our humanity we never lose touch with it in this lifetime... as it's just understood that we have an obligation to honor it... by living it. 

 The lines between our humanity, the ego and the 'person' can get blurry... until the individual can detach.   Then the distinction between them is understood... and then none of them are a 'problem'.   Our humanity and it's ego are required for a human experience... the assumption that we're a separate 'person' is not.

IE: all you need for a human experience is your humanity and your being... the idea of being a separate 'person' is optional.

 You could even make the argument that this assumption is the 'flaw' in the system... (this mass 'Multiple Separate Person Disorder') and that without it humanity on earth would be an entirely differnt experience than the one we have now because then we would all 'understand'... as paradox would be a 'given'... and 'mass' understanding would then put every little thing in proper perspective.

 

Huricane Sandy first responders and transcendence

Although this discussion is about art I do believe that personal transcendence can and will be found among the first responders to Hurican Sandy. So for what its worth, if you're looking for a silver lining to the devastation, there will be some lives spiritually changed forever... as in 'different'... by this tragedy through unexpected breakthroughs to the transcendent.  Transpersonal transcendence in this context is the 'spontaneous unpremeditated transcending of personal concerns' for the sake of others in dire need and can take on all the classic characteristics of the spiritual experiences in the literature. Its historically quite common in first responders to emergencies.

 IE: a 'self' less response.

 There is a counselor in California whose practice is primarily made up of first responders who are mystified by their experiences in the midst of emergencies and who want to delve more deeply into it. He is a teacher of Advaita Vedanta in his 'other' life so this comes naturally to him.

Similar experiences in combat are legendary and one of the most adrenaline pumping examples of that IMO is contained in a book called "Soldiers Heart' on Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Soldiers-Heart-Inspirational-Memoir-Inquiry/dp/1403394822

In it Lee Burkins finds himself out of body in a shell hole thats about to be overrun. Today he's a Ba-Gua Chi-Gung Master teaching in Colorado but he got his 'spiritual initiation'... literally... in the 'fight of his life'.

If in Doubt, Focus Out

Jonathan Zap of zaporacle.com One way of detaching from neurotic ego, internal considering and psychic entropy is to focus out. One is detaching from inner chaos through engagement with the external world and external considering of others. I discuss this strategy here: http://www.zaporacle.com/card/if-in-doubt-focus-out/

re

 Yes... this is good and necessary at times.  Otherwise the inner obsessed seeker can deteriorate into a long term attitude of "it's all about 'me'"... which only reinforces the core attachment.

 Traditionaly Karma yoga is the path of self less service but it depends on the individual as some are obsessed with outer considering and some are obsessed with inner considering.  So in each case the opposite considering is called for to help balance them. 

 Most of us are some combination of outer and inner obsessed so the 3rd way is the way of combining the above prescription with either a bodily practice or a simple mantra... or both.   The advantage is that neither the bodily practice or a simple mantra relies on 'the mind making up its mind' about something... you have to do an 'end run' on the mind deciding for its self... and that is where bodily practices and mantras excel because both promote balance of the mind by not allowing the mind to "consider".   This takes the edge off the obsession (inner or outer) and promotes an attitude of "it's not all about me".

 When the seeker can get to the point where they acknowledge that it's not all about them, then they are getting somewhere.

 In the end IMO it takes a multi-tiered approach to detaching with a number of techniques, practices and approaches that work in a variety of circumstances as that's the stuff of life.  So to just rely on only one mental approach to detaching is like pushing a rope up a hill.  But bodily practices and simple mantras work no matter what the circumstances of our lives... so they are the ultimate relief... IMO.    Obviously art and creativity are great outlets or paths to transmute the energy of either inner or outer obsessing as well.

 I would disagree though that it's the ego that is neurotic.  The ego IMO is just the operating system for our humanity and as such is a neutral thing... until it's coupled to the belief in a separate person.  This coupling of the ego to the person "personalizes" the ego which can inflame it and that is where the problem arises.  So the seeker that is detaching is helping to decouple the person from the ego... thus giving it less reason to over react... and more opportunities to respond.  At least in practice, that is because it takes practice.

 

 

I used to do identical

I used to do identical things as a kid. I would lay on my back in a way that once a while, up-side-down used to be normal. This kind of cool place. I can move there each time I like now simply by recalling it. Nice article. The lacking element, or the mystery, is a gorgeous thought to embrace. This is an ever evolving experience. Crystallisation or a last definition of what this is may render the enjoy stale in less than half of a second. Peace Aneka Indonesia | Bank Mandiri Bank Terbaik di Indonesia | Software ERP Indonesia | Iconia PC tablet dengan windows 8 | Ekiosku.com Jual Beli Online Aman Menyenangkan