Support our Kickstarter

Energy, Ego, and Entheogens: The Reality of Human Liberation from Illusion

dmtbig.jpg


Recently, I published an article entitled "Terence on DMT," where I strongly critiqued Terence McKenna for his popular lectures on DMT.  The gist of the article was that what Terence described as the "DMT experience" should more properly be described as "Terence's DMT experience" as I showed that the majority of what he had to say on the subject, at least at the popular/public level, was generated by his ego and therefore is best understood as personal projection.  To illustrate these conclusions, I applied what I have come to call the "Entheological Paradigm" to Terence's public talks, as available on Youtube videos.  The article generated a great deal of resistance and backlash, as expected, as well as some serious questions.  Issuing a no-holds-barred critique of a well-loved and extremely popular public figure isn't exactly a way to win friends, but it is effective for provoking people.  My main aim was to demonstrate that entheogenic experiences are not mysterious and can be fully explained and understood from a naturalistic perspective that does not require belief in any "other realms" or "other beings."  When entheogenic experiences are properly understood for what they are -- energetic experiences that exhibit a dynamic relationship between the ego and universal self -- the most bizarre experiences can easily be identified as expressions and constructs of the grasping ego.  Another aim was to raise the issue of human liberation from self-generated illusion and the suffering that results from such illusions.  The purpose of this essay here is to follow up on this particular idea with a clear analysis of the energetic nature of entheogens and their relationship to the energy mobilized and structured by the ego.

 

The Entheological Paradigm

I will begin by mentioning that I have made the Entheological Paradigm available to the public as lectures on my podcast, "The Entheogenic Evolution," in my book, Being Human: An Entheological Guide to God, Evolution, and the Fractal Energetic Nature of Reality, as videos on Youtube, as a website, and as public lectures at events like Burning Man.  In my book, Being Human, I write, on page 57, "A common effect of working with entheogens is attachment to story.  People see visions or encounter other ‘beings' and then proceed to weave fantastic stories around their experiences.  Terence McKenna and the infamous machine elves are an excellent case in point."

I have yet to receive a single complaint from a reader of Being Human for that passage and the sentences that follow.  My recent article was simply the full analysis of the reality of that claim.  Therefore, for those who have followed my work, this was nothing new or unexpected.  However, for many readers, I'm sure that this was their first exposure to the Entheological Paradigm (and my provocative communication style).  My suggestion for all interested readers is to take a look at Being Human and see what you think.  At the least, it is my hope that this article will help generate deeper understanding of the Entheological Paradigm and why it is significant for understanding not only entheogenic experiences, but reality as a whole, including one's understanding of the genuine nature of the self.

The Entheological Paradigm is not a system of beliefs, metaphysics, or spirituality.  As the name suggests, it is a descriptive model of reality based on direct experience through entheogenic states of consciousness and energetic awareness.  As such, it can be confirmed directly by anyone willing to go through a rigorous process of self-discovery and analysis through highly specific entheogenic methods.  It is not a belief system generated through the use of entheogens.  It is a direct experience of the energetic nature of reality using entheogenic tools.  Beliefs and direct experience are two radically different things, and there are no beliefs in the Entheological Paradigm.

It is a very strong claim to say that something does not contain any beliefs.  This is especially true when one is making statements about the ultimate nature of reality.  It is a popular belief today that all beliefs are equally valid when discussing the ultimate nature of reality, and many tout such obviously sloppy thinking as some kind of vaguely feel-good "new paradigm" thought.  Many people are of the view that if you believe in something, then, it is, in some sense, true.  The corollary to such a view is that it is assumed that all statements about the nature of reality are, by definition, beliefs.  In other words, genuine knowledge is seen as dubious, at best, and impossible, at worst, and therefore all we have are our beliefs.  These beliefs then seem to get support from various experiences that we might have, or we might feel forced to change our beliefs when a given experience does not conform to our previous expectations.  Beliefs, therefore, both shape, and are shaped by, our experiences.  But at the popular level, at least, questions of ontology and epistemology have fallen by the wayside and there is something of a free-for-all in the reality belief game and much "new paradigm" thinking is a morass of pseudo-scientific mush mixed with incompatible and contradictory spiritual metaphysics.  What is sorely lacking is clarity, discernment, and a realistic model of what constitutes "reality."

The question of, "How do we know what we think we know?" is epistemology.  The question of, "What actually exists?" is ontology.  These questions are intimately related, for how we answer one affects how we are able to answer the other.  The Entheological Paradigm provides an ontological answer, coupled with a system of epistemology based on mathematics and a careful analysis of the phenomenology of entheogenic experiences, with special attention paid to non-dual, or unitary states of being.

The Entheological Paradigm is not something that I learned from anyone.  Nor is it something that I have intellectually constructed through studying the works and systems of others.  It is not based on any pre-existing religious, philosophical, metaphysical, spiritual, or scientific system, though it shares certain concepts and truths with other systems.  It is the product of my personal exploration into myself, and the conclusions I was forced to reached about the nature of the self and the nature of reality.  Despite having reached these conclusions subjectively, I argue that they are in fact universal.  In other words, I am claiming to have discovered the genuine truth about the nature of the self and the nature of reality.  This is not "my" belief system, nor is it "just my perspective."  This is objective truth and others can confirm this for themselves.  In fact, that is what is preferred.  "Believing" in something is utterly meaningless.  Experiencing the truth directly is the only way to genuinely know reality.  There is no need for beliefs in the Entheological Paradigm.

How I came about the Entheological Paradigm is complex story.  I've shared much of it publicly on "The Entheogenic Evolution" podcast, and will provide a very short summary here.  In essence, almost three years ago, I decided that I had been holding myself back and endlessly compromising myself in my life, and found the courage to do something about it.  I left everything stable in my life and ventured out on a process of self-discovery.  A central component of this self-discovery process was entheogens: in particular, Salvia divinorum, Ayahuasca (in the form of Daime), and 5-MeO-DMT.  To put it quite simply, what I learned and discovered about myself was that I was God, a "being" that I had no prior "belief" in, and that this being had absolutely nothing to do with any of the religions or spiritual teachings promoted by different human societies and traditions.  This was anything but an easy process for my ego to go through.  In fact, it was, by far, the most difficult and radically challenging thing I had ever been through in my life.  It's one thing for an ego to find out that something it had no necessary belief in existed, but that this being was identical with the self, was quite another matter. 

Having my Ph.D. in Religious Studies, I was certainly aware of the widespread beliefs in God and a "mystical," unitary reality, as these are common themes in many religions.  However, what I also realized, in discovering the genuine nature of myself, is that the vast majority of what all religions have to say about God and the ultimate nature of reality and the self is wildly off the mark, and in many cases, seriously wrong.  In truth, it became immediately clear that all those belief systems, religions, and spiritual teachings were mere nuggets of truth wrapped in multiple layers of ego-generated illusion and fantasy. 

This was quite startling for me.  For one, it meant that all those "possibilities" for which I had once held out an open mind, and in some cases, and yearning heart, were just illusions.  It also meant, even more shockingly, that somehow, I had come to understand things that others hadn't -- even the so-called "great mystics" and "masters," because it was simply too clear to me where their egos were influencing what they were saying and teaching.  Even Buddhism, I found, my personal favorite, was seriously clouded in illusion at many levels.  And it wasn't simply a matter of differences in beliefs.  It was a difference in our experiences of energy.  I found that I could immediately distinguish between ego and truth at an energetic level in my entire being.  A visual metaphor might be useful: For those who have eyesight, it is obvious when the light is either turned on or off.  You can simply see it.  It is not a matter of belief.  It is reality.  What I discovered in myself was the ability to energetically perceive and experience the difference between when "ego is on" or when "ego is off."  What I experienced was that what often passed for "enlightened teachings" was anything but!

I was able to accomplish this in myself because I chose to permanently surrender my ego to my true nature as an infinite energy being (and reaffirm this choice on a moment to moment basis).  My ego is still a part of me, but I have learned that is it most definitely not me, nor are its ideas or beliefs.  In surrendering my ego, virtually everything about me has changed, including my voice, my body, my energy, my thoughts, and my perceptions and experiences.  I have experienced what I can only call genuine human liberation.  I have freed myself.  Through teaching about the Entheological Paradigm, that is what I hope to share with others: a genuine path to true liberation.  To get there, though, all illusions must be overcome and released, including those generated by our most beloved entertainers and cultural icons, as well as all religions, spiritual systems, and cultural belief systems.  It's a big job, and it progresses one person at a time, one ego at a time.  It must be directly experienced by any given individual as this is not something that can merely be understood intellectually or "believed" in.  Beliefs and ideas about the nature of reality are completely meaningless.  Only by truly learning of your genuine nature as an embodied energy being can you begin to understand the true difference between reality and that which we impose upon it through our own thoughts, choices, and beliefs.

So what is the Entheological Paradigm?  It is a complete analysis of reality as the integrated and interrelated expression of a Unitary Energy Being, otherwise known as "God."  To put it simply, all of reality is a unified energetic system that is conscious, self-aware, and evolving according to energetic laws.  There is no real difference between organic, inorganic, subjective and objective as ALL manifestations within reality follow the same set of energetic rules and laws.  Everything that exists is a form of energy and it is all unified within a singular self-awareness and consciousness.  The rest of this essay will present an overview of how this works and the role that entheogens can play in bringing about direct experience of the fundamental nature of reality and the process of undergoing self-liberation through awareness and the exercise of personal responsibility.

 

Consciousness

Consciousness is not a specific energy, material, or substance.  It is an inherent property of reality.  In other words, consciousness is not a "product" of biological systems.  Biological systems organize and utilize energy in ways that allow for self-referential awareness and expression.  Another way of saying this is that all of reality is alive and aware and this property is uniquely expressed in biological beings but is not a product of their biological system.

This understanding of life/consciousness obviates any need for beliefs in "spirits" or "souls."  These concepts identify life and consciousness as a particular substance, material, or energy, and then give it a name and an identity.  Besides there being no scientific evidence for any such "substance" or "energy" of consciousness that mystically and mysteriously "relates" to or "inhabits" the body, there is also no reason to believe in such entities or energies when consciousness is properly understood as a property of reality itself, not a particular energy or construct within it.

 

The Ego

The ego is a self-referential program within the structure of human consciousness.  The ego organizes its understanding of what is occurring to it within its energetic field (that which it experiences and senses through the construct of the body) as relationships between what it chooses to identify as its "self" and that which it chooses to identify as "other."   The problem for the ego is that there is no inherent "self" within human consciousness.  Therefore, in order for the ego to construct an identity, it must make what are realistically arbitrary decisions.  If there isn't any real energetic divide between self and other (there is no fundamental "self" with which the ego can identify), then all such designations are by definition conventions and illusions.

In constructing its sense of self, the ego develops countless energetic programs based on choices it perceives for navigating the artificial/conventional world of "self" and "other."  These energetic programs take the form of habits, beliefs, body postures, movements, vocal expressions, tone of voice, gestures, and behavior patterns in both thought and action.

As the ego is ultimately made up of arbitrary energetic constructs, it continually seeks to reaffirm its sense of self and world and validate the conclusions it has made about the nature and identify of the self.  The last thing that the ego wants to is to be confronted with the reality that, "You're full of shit," as that does not reaffirm its sense of self and world.  In fact, it conflicts with it dramatically.  When such a confrontation occurs, egos have a couple of choices.  One is to pretend that nothing happened, and go about business as usual.  The other is to hold on even stronger to the self-generated illusions, especially through finding others who share similar illusions and allow for group identity, or, embark on an existential crisis that may or may not resolve beneficially.  If beneficial, the individual will find a new state of liberation from the constructs of the ego.  If not beneficial, the ego will simply adopt a new set of beliefs and structures in place of the old ones.

 

The Difference between Egotistical and "Egoic"

It is extremely important to understand that saying that something is a product of the ego is distinct from claiming that someone is behaving "egotistically."  Saying that someone is being "egotistical" is a social approbation of someone's perceived selfish behavior.  To say that someone's ego is creating illusions and distortions in their experience of reality is not to say that they are being selfish.  For this reason, the word "egoic," as in, pertaining to the nature of the ego, would be a better fit when discussing ego-generated illusion.  For example, Buddhism is well-known for teaching selflessness and is believed to be a path to lessen the ego and free the mind from its illusions.  However, under the analysis provided by the Entheological Paradigm, we can see that while Buddhism might promote unselfish behavior and thinking, it is thoroughly egoic in its constructs of reality.  Buddhism teaches, for example, that while there is "no-self," each individual is ultimately a "stream of consciousness" that is "trapped in manifestation" through repeated "reincarnations" until "karma is cleansed" and the individual reaches Nirvana.

According the reality of the Entheological Paradigm, none of those claims are true statements about either reality or consciousness.  These are just ideas constructed by the ego and are not energetic realities.  Consciousness is only seemingly individuated in biological beingsThe evolution of "consciousness" is therefore identical with, first, inorganic, and then later, organic evolution.  This entire evolutionary process is the evolution of the Unitary Energy Being that ultimately is all of organic and inorganic reality.  This One Being is already every being.  Living beings are not expressions of a "stream of consciousness" that is "trapped in manifestation" in a linear series of individuated evolving forms.  There is no energetic corollary in reality that equates with these illusory concepts.  As such, these concepts are constructs of the ego.  In essence, Buddhists do not understand either consciousness or the nature of biological evolution and have covered over their lack of understanding with a spiritual metaphysics that has no basis in reality, despite their teachings of "selflessness".

But aren't these concepts generated from the experiences of mystics?  Didn't the Buddha experience these things?  Don't some people recall past lives?

These are all possible questioning rejoinders to the claims made above.  Certainly many people have had "past life" recollections or experiences, so there seems to be some curious data present.  However, even specific memory recall does not provide evidence of "reincarnation" of an individuated stream of consciousness.  Given the reality that there is only one being that is manifested as all living beings simultaneously, there's no reason that data from one manifestation couldn't be accessed by or transferred to another manifestation.  The more interesting question is more along the lines of: why?  For what purpose?  Seeing that all of reality is the expression of one being, it would seem that that being is, in a very real sense, playing games with itself.  It's going about pretending to be "self" and "other," when it is, in truth, All.  Any ego that chooses to see itself as anything less than "All" can experience and perceive any myriad of fun "reality games."  The possibilities are endless.

So a "past life" experience doesn't preclude other possibilities, including the understanding that there's really only one being "pretending" to many beings at once (and over time).  The "experience" does not prove a "reality."  It is also important to keep in mind that the Buddha, as a historical person, took many of his teachings from the cultural milieu in which he lived.  While his teachings challenged many of the great assumptions of the Brahmins, including their assumption of the immortal soul or self (the Brahmanic atman versus the Buddhist an-atman), he never questioned their teachings on reincarnation and karma (though he rejected the idea of incarnating into stratified social and economic castes), which is why Buddhists had to explain (quite problematically, and to my mind, quite unconvincingly) how a non-existing self is reincarnated via karma by means of a "stream of consciousness."  Here, Buddhists are showing an egoic attachment to the idea of individual spiritual and conscious evolution.  They also hold onto an egoic idea of some kind of end "release" or "extinguishing" of repeated incarnations and define this as "liberation."  That is pure ego projection and rejection of reality as it is experienced here and now, in all its perfection.  Any notion of getting "out" of reality is pure ego-fantasy.  Thus, Buddhism may teach selflessness, but as a "religion," it is purely egoic in nature.  What redeems Buddhism, at least at the practical level, is that it also comes with numerous meditative techniques for stilling, calming, and clarifying the mind, all of which can be quite beneficial for individuals.  These techniques do not necessarily produce "enlightenment," however, and certainly not in the sense of Nirvana as being a final extinguishing of endless linear individuated incarnations.

 

God, or the "Unitary Energy Being"

It might be construed that the use of the word "God" is meant to imply a specific religious or theological view.  This would be incorrect.  God is described within the Entheological Paradigm as a Unitary Energy Being, which is quite distinct from any religious construction of a mythical being that stands outside of or beyond its creation.  God, as a self-aware energy being, is reality itself.  Energy, as we know from physics, functions according to energetic principles, and as such, can be expressed mathematically.  Mathematics are universal descriptions of energy: math is not bound by any culture, religion, or belief system.  Math, however, contains its own rules: these are the rules of energy and the transformation and expression of energy.  Reality is mathematical in nature.  It is energetic in nature.

"Objective" science has grouped mathematical and energetic descriptions of reality into different areas of focus and study: physics, chemistry, biology, geology, ecology, etc., all of which are able to map and describe patterns of transformation of different spectrums and conglomerations of energy.  However, when we look across scales, what we find is that the mathematical proportions of geometry, symmetry, and fractal mathematics hold across all levels of reality.

When "consciousness" and "life" are understood as expressions of energy, it is easy to see that here too we find geometry, symmetry, and fractals.  Physically, living beings are all geometric and fractal energetic constructs.  Yet these patterns of energy extend into behavior patterns, choices, thought patterns, means of expression, etc.  All living beings exhibit patterned thought and behavior.  With complex beings, such as humans, it is easy to see that our "small" behaviors, choices, and actions, share similar patterns of thought and reaction to our "big" behaviors, choices, and actions.  In other words, though it might seem a bit abstract to refer to behavior as a fractal, in the sense that fractals are iterations of repeating patterns across different scales, then the energy starts to become clear.  The "little things" reflect the "big things" because they're part of the same ultimate pattern.

We also know that our heart, the immediate physical source of our life energy, emits an electromagnetic field that extends indefinitely beyond our bodies.  That electromagnetic field is holographic in nature and is powered by the fractal iterations of our heartbeat.  Humans, as well as other living beings, are, quite literally, living fractal energy beings.  Even our DNA is structured as fractal patterns!

Why is everything that exists a geometric/fractal pattern of energy?  Because the Unitary Energy Being that is all of reality is a fractal energy being.  This fact is reflected in the particular and "individuated" manifestations of this one being, which we call, from the human perspective, the objects, beings, and occurrences within reality.  The only limits within reality are the energetic limits that are inherent to energy itself (which we tend to call physics, etc.), or those that we impose through our beliefs, ideas, and choices, which may or may not be congruent with actual reality.

What this all means is that the only limits to recognition and experience of unitary being are the limits imposed on the self by the ego.  In other words, the one and only thing that prevents anyone from directly experiencing themselves as the Unitary Energy Being that they are is their ego and the beliefs, ideas, and illusions that the ego uses to artificially construct its sense of self.  It's actually all quite simple.  There is no need to introduce complex metaphysics, religion, or spirituality into the picture.  It's a simple energetic reality.  And as such, the solution to the problem of "separation" is energetic in nature.  To be clear, this is NOT a "spiritual" or even a "mystical" issue.  It is an energetic issue.  Once this reality is understood as such, all religions and spiritual traditions can be seen for what they are: obsolete egoic constructs that are not able to deliver on their promises of liberation or salvation because they are based on energetic illusions that in fact create the separation they claim to overcome!

 

Entheogens

Once the projected illusions, false beliefs, and ideational and behavioral constructs of the ego are understood to be energetic in nature, then seeking an energetic solution becomes a natural and effective choice for addressing the problems created by ego.    And rest assured, ego creates all kinds of problems!  How could it be otherwise, when, in principle, ego functions to create artificial constructs of the self and protect these constructs from anything that challenges them?  That is an energetic recipe for drama, conflict, violence, hate, fear, judgment, jealousy, rage, victimization, self-pitty, indulgence, and on and on.  On the positive side of things, it also creates an energetic recipe for questioning, challenging boundaries, exploration, inquisitiveness, inventiveness, and all manner of ways of engaging the world to satisfy our ego's curiosity about the objects of its experience.  However, as exceptionally able embodiments of the One, we are intelligent enough to pursue the benefits of our nature without the drawbacks.  To do so, however, we've got to get beyond our egos and their reactionary and illusion-projecting nature.

The central key to such a liberation and unleashing of human potential is entheogens.  The word, "entheogens," means, "generating the experience of God within," and is meant as a substitute for the more general term of "psychedelic."    I prefer the term entheogen to psychedelic, personally, but perhaps, for my purposes, an even better term might be something along the lines of energen, to indicate the idea of "generating the experience of energy."  This is what I have come to understand is the primary function of entheogens or psychedelics: they alter our ability to perceive and experience energy.  At peak moments, especially of extraordinary medicines such as 5-MeO-DMT, they allow an individual to experience the immediate nature of infinity energetically.  This is what might be called a "union with the Infinite," "being one with God," or "being pure consciousness/energy."

Rather than terms such as "enlightenment" or "awakening," the most powerful of entheogenic experiences can be more readily understood as being full energetic openings or expansions.  Such experiences are what are traditionally labeled as being mystical in nature.  Different mystical traditions have advocated different techniques for reaching such seemingly rarified states of consciousness, from years of meditation, to the traditional use of entheogens.  Some traditions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism, have developed sophisticated symbolic systems to describe and harness the energy of such experiences, and structured them into teachings of "subtle energy."  These teachings are often combined with other aspects of the traditions' belief systems, and while practical, in some respects, are also made obsolete by a more grounded understanding based on the bio-energetics of the human body rather than ideational realities of a "subtle," yet, unseen body or realm.

Hinduism, for example, teaches that there is a kundalini serpent at the base of your spine that you can mentally coax along the axis of your subtle energy centers, which are specifically understood to be independent of your actual physiology.  This is ultimately a mental energy trick - a way of playing with the mind to move energy.  It can be effective.  It is also unnecessary.  Entheogens are far more effective in moving energy and hold open the reality of cutting out the "middle man" of mental tricks, symbols, and cultural systems.  Entheogens go directly and immediately to the source: your actual energy that is present in your body.

Structurally, entheogens are actually crystalline compounds that function as neurotransmitters.  Two very powerful entheogens, 5-meO-DMT and N,N DMT are endogenous compounds in the human nervous system.  When we ingest entheogens, these crystalline compounds act at receptor sites in our nervous system and dramatically affect our ability to perceive and experience energy.  Perhaps this effect is due to the simple reason that crystals work to focus and amplify energy as a physical property of their geometric structure.

Different entheogens alter our ability to perceive and experience energy in somewhat different ways, but underneath any unique presentation is the universal presence of fundamental energy.  Salvia divinorum presents very differently from DMT, for example, but both alter one's ability to experience energy.  Some medicines are more visual in nature, whereas others are more somatic or kinesthetic.  Some medicines can produce high levels of vibrations in the body as the energy works through the biological/energetic system, and others produce slow waves of energy that might feel as though they are pushing one over and smearing one out (a common experience with salvia). 

 

Egoic Reactions to Energetic Opening and Expansion

Egos tend to experience themselves as existing in a state of paradox.  On the one hand, egos are often terrified to let go, surrender, and just "go with the flow," and on the other, egos relish and crave the release that comes with complete surrender.  At base is the issue of trust.  When an ego is trusting, it can let go.  When it feels a lack of trust, it holds on to fear, and refuses.  It is always ultimately an individual choice.

Virtually any entheogenic experience will require the ego to let go, at least to some extent.  Egos that refuse to let go at all tend have what is described as a "bad trip," as the individual is just fighting the energy the entire time and refusing to trust.  However, different medicines have different abilities to truly open one up, energetically.  Letting go all the way on a small dose of mushrooms, for example, is hardly comparable to letting go all the way on a high dose of 5-MeO-DMT.  One can achieve different experiential results with the use of different tools.

The most effective tool for an immediate energetic expansion into one's full energetic state is 5-MeO-DMT, with DMT coming up as a somewhat distant second.  Even with the infinite power of 5-MeO-DMT, ego still has a choice, however.  The infinite expansion is so overwhelming, especially when one is new to the medicine, that ego can either quickly give up and completely let go, or react in absolute horror and terror at coming so quickly "face to face with God."

Even when ego lets go, however, that is not the end of how ego can affect the experience.  If the individual has energetic holdings, in the ways of beliefs, ideas, fears, judgments, etc., these will start to work themselves out energetically within the experience.  Ego may have let go, but it is still comprised of energetic patterns.  As the infinite energy of one's true being continues to expand, it eventually pushes up against these energetic egoic constructs.  At this point, the individual may start to have a deeply introspective experience that can take on the form of visionary awareness.  Eventually these patterns will gain the upper hand and even though still "tripping" very hard, most individuals will feel the grip of their ego reassert well before the entheogenic event is over and the medicine ceases to have an effect.

Ego can also play off itself not necessarily in the form of introspective awareness, but of extrospective awareness in the sense of seeing and experiencing seemingly very real "exterior" realities.  These realities can either be confusing realms of bizarre otherness, or can take on a more archetypal, educational quality where the ego experiences things as being revealed to it by guides and entities.  These are all projections of the self, however, and are a method for the self to communicate with itself through simultaneous multiple role playing (similar to dreams in that the dreamer only egoically identifies with one perspective within a dream but is in fact all the characters and the total environment).  It is a trick of the mind in an interior space: an energetic virtual reality, as it were.  These realities too will eventually disappear as the ego beings to reassert itself and reconstitute its "normal" energetic and behavioral patterns.

When analyzed carefully, all "visions" can be comprehended as messages from the self, even when seemingly completely "other."  This is especially the case when appreciated from the perspective that there is, in reality, only one being, and it is communicating between its unitary perspective and the perspective of one of its individuated selves/ego.  Often the game-like nature of the communication also becomes apparent, as well as the intrusions of ego and the ways it attempts to overlay the experience with its own sense of meaning.

In other words, visionary experiences are you giving yourself what your ego is able to process at that time. 

In the absence of specific visionary imagery, the most common perceptions with entheogens are simply perceptions of energy.  This energy usually is of a highly complex geometric and fractal nature.  This should come as no surprise, since all of the energy of reality is geometric and fractal in nature.  It is from this geometric matrix of energy that visions and visionary content arises.  People with clear egos tend to primarily see the energy and do not have "visions" for they are immediately experienced as self-evident projections.  Clear egos don't provide any energetic constructs for the energy to "bounce off of" and form pictures.

Of far more significance than any visionary content is the experience of energy in the body.  Visions are an excellent means of communication from the self to the self, but they can also become an object of distraction and attachment.  There are times when individuals can benefit from spending more time energetically "in their heads" in that visual space, but in order to ground into actual reality, individuals must, of necessity, get fully into the energy of their entire being, and that primarily means getting their awareness fully into their bodies.  This is the difference between living in fantasyland and actual reality.  The difference is crucial and real.

One of the great benefits to working with 5-MeO-DMT versus DMT is that, not only is it far more powerful of an energetic opener, but it is also less visual, though its visual nature can be pronounced.  The primary nature of the 5-MeO-DMT experience, however, is the overwhelming feeling of fractal flows of energy throughout the body, and not only throughout the body, but throughout all of reality, as well.  The feeling is centered in the body, however, and most especially the heart (the location of the largest electromagnetic field produced by the body).  There is infinite balance and infinite perfection to this endless outpouring of this symmetrical energy.  It is the pure energy of being.  It is radiant.  It is love.  It is what is.  It is the Self.

Most people can't maintain that perfect unified awareness of infinite energy for very long, however, and ego begins to collapse in on itself very quickly, even with 5-MeO-DMT.  As this happens, energy flows shift and change in the body.  The body is the ultimate vehicle for the expression of the full spectrum of your energy and holds the patterns of everything you ever think and do.  Anywhere that your ego has created constrictions in your being, or holdings of fear or judgment or lack of trust, will be pushed and aggravated by the energy of one's infinite expansion.  This can cause muscle trembles, vibrations, purging, coughing, crying, laughing: any manner of energetic release and letting go. 

It is these energetic releases that we tend to call "healing" events within the use of entheogens.  Often, entheogenic healing is performed in the context of shamanism where the language is that of spirits, possessions, purification, etc.  Energetically, this language is unnecessary, confusing, and promotes lack of personal responsibility.  Each individual is personally responsible for his or her energetic holdings, for they were the one who chose to create it in the first place, and only they can release it.  There is no magic or mysticism involved.  There are no spiritual energies involved.  It is all personal energy in your body/being.  The Entheological Paradigm promotes radical personal responsibility for all of ones energy.  No one is a victim and there is no one to blame.  Everyone is personally responsible for themselves and their energy.

Disassociating from ones energy is a pathway to trouble.  The way that we relate to our energy inside our bodies and inside our minds is directly reflected in our exterior relationships with others, and indeed, the entire "exterior" world.  Our subjective experience is mirrored by our objective experience and vice versa.  Energetically, there is no real boundary.  Disassociating from any aspect of ourselves, including supposed "others," is a recipe for energetic imbalance, disharmony, and withholding.  It is only by taking responsibility for our energy on all levels that we can overcome our egoic energetic tendencies.  And taking responsibility means owning our energy and not looking to others either for salvation or blame, in any way.  Each individual is 100% responsible for him or herself.

 

Symmetry

A key component of getting to know one's energy is the issue of symmetry and symmetrical movement and expression.  I first encountered this key feature of energetic balance in myself in my entheogenic sessions and subsequently observed it in others.  I now incorporate this as a primary feature of all entheogenic sessions and insist on it for any client who would undertake a session with me.

My first encounter with symmetry came with my very first 5-MeO-DMT experience.  The overall experience was so overwhelming that I didn't take much notice of symmetry that first time.  However, upon subsequent sessions with this medicine, I quickly learned that symmetry was a central component of the experience and it was anything but inconsequential.  In fact, it is probably the single most important element of energy work with entheogens and its significance cannot be overstated.  The fact that there is not a single tradition, shamanic, mystical, religious, metaphysical, or otherwise that mentions the key importance of symmetry is a clear indication that there is something very unique about the Entheological Paradigm, and a gaping hole in our collective traditions that supposedly offer awakening and oneness.

The human body, just like all other biological forms, is structurally a fractal, with various subsets of fractal patterns within it.  Early life forms exhibit radial, branch, and spiral symmetry in their structural features.  Later, more complex life, exhibits bilateral symmetry as a universal structural feature.  This evolutionary development and energetic blueprint allowed for the development of complex nervous systems and sensory organs (energy receivers) with brain, spinal column, and fractal branches of nerves (that in mammals are lined with DMT).  The overall pattern of the human body, along with countless other species, is one of bilateral symmetry.

What I first discovered in my 5-MeO-DMT sessions, and then shortly thereafter with ayahuasca, was that as soon as my energy opened up and my ego let go and released, my body would instantly behave and move with coordinated bilateral symmetry.  With the absence of my ego-generated constraints on my energy, my limbs would naturally mirror each other, and it felt as though my arms and legs were moving in tracks of energy.  Not only that, but through the palms and fingers of my hands, I could feel fractal waves of energy connecting my heart, the center of my being, to everything else in existence, that poured out of me in explosive, bilaterally symmetrical forms.  When I went into symmetry, there were no energetic barriers and I was in a state of complete unitary consciousness and energetic connection. 

The best way my ego could make sense of these experiences, where my arms and legs would flow in fluid, graceful movements as my spine undulated and my voice modulated to very deep frequencies with numerous overtones and harmonics, was to accept that "God" appeared be taking over my entire being and moving my body and using my voice (which no longer sounded anything like "my" voice).  It was a long process for me to understand what was happening here, and these events of spontaneous fluid symmetrical movement with alterations in my voice (and consciousness and perception) started intruding into everyday events and situations in ways that deeply unsettled my ego.  For a time, my ego was convinced that I might be losing my mind.

What I came to learn with time, patience, and a great deal of entheogenic persistence, was that yes, this energy was indeed "God," but it was also me, though it wasn't the "me" that my ego had constructed as its sense of self.  In essence, what I came to understand was that to be human meant to be the perfect bio-vehicle for God to experience reality in.  Human beings are perfectly autonomous embodiments of God.  All of life is One, as is all of reality.  But humans are special, because we have the ability to actually know and experience the truth of this reality.  It is the gift of the ego that allows for genuine awakening to our full energetic natures.  As direct embodiments of the Unitary Energy Being, we have the capacity to fully know who and what we are as living energy.

Eventually, within myself, there ceased to be any distinction between a full energetic opening and "normal" experience.  What had originally presented itself to my ego as an experience between "me" and "God" eventually just became the experience of myself, in all my energy, freed from the limiting confines of my ego and its energetic structures.  In essence, I came to know and experience my true nature on a permanent basis. 

It was through working with symmetry that this was possible for me, and it is the number one tool I use when conducting sessions with others because the difference is real and immediately noticeable.  Non-egoic energy, or ones true, genuine, and infinite energy, is, in the human form, bilateral in symmetry, centered, and balanced.  Egoic energy is asymmetrical, non-centered, and imbalanced. 

What happens, physically, when someone undergoes a full energetic opening?  The immediate physical/energetic response is to lie back and open the arms and legs into a "spread eagle" position.  Physically, this is when the body is most open.  It is also when a person is most energetically open, trusting, relaxed, centered, and balanced.  Anyone who has a full energetic opening and is completely surrendered will automatically and immediately go into this position.  Imagine an infinite orgasm that instantly explodes you into pure radiant light as you melt into the fabric of the universe and you can start to get an idea of what I'm talking about.

However, not everyone can maintain this level of radical openness and energetic intensity.  If someone chooses to let their ego react, it will always do so asymmetrically.  The individual will turn to the side, reach out with one hand while closing the other, open their eyes and look off to the side, or they may start to move from side to side or vibrate.  Whenever ego decides to react negatively or with closed resistance to infinite energy, symmetry is always broken in one way or another.

Egos who are struggling to remain open and not resist can still maintain some symmetry, but they tend to exhibit grasping and tension in the body.  Ego can hold on by attempting to regulate breathing or through griping the hands.  The body remains symmetrical, but it is not relaxed, fluid, and supple.  It is ridgid, firm, and tense.  Breathing is labored, being either too shallow or too deep.  Generally, these kinds of body movements and signs indicate any combination of lack of trust, fear, lack of personal permission to let go, or even attempting to over-think or intellectualize the experience.

Egos that manage to completely let go fall into spontaneous movements where the individual may or may not be able to recall what occurred during that portion of the entheogenic session.  At this point, ego is entirely relaxed and the individual has completely embraced their genuine energy.  When this occurs, arms and legs never cross the centerline of the body.  Everything the right hand and arm does is mirrored by the left, and the same for the legs.  Individuals will undulate along their spines, but never move from side-to-side.  All movements are perfectly symmetrical and mirrored.

Even for egos that let go all the way, the energetic structures of ego will eventually reassert themselves.  For those who had been doing spontaneous movement, there is generally an abrupt recognition where ego suddenly intrudes and says, "What in the world am I doing?"  This moment is easy to spot as someone will suddenly stop moving, or the nature of the movement will change, or break into asymmetry.  You can sense the embarrassment of the ego that suddenly catches itself doing something it wasn't aware of.  Hands immediately drop to the chest, or come down to the side.  The person clears their throat and asks for a glass of water, attempting to regain "normalcy" through asymmetrical action and interaction.  When I'm conducting sessions, that's usually the point where I say, "You're ready for more medicine."

Consciously maintaining symmetry in one's entheogenic practice is a way of keeping oneself open, present, and centered.  If someone finds it difficult to maintain symmetry, it can really help to have a coach to offer reminders, or even physically help an individual back into symmetry.  For advanced guides, I recommend practicing what I call "energetic mirroring" where both the guide and client take medicine together, facing each other, while maintaining bilateral symmetry.  The guide is there to be a mirror for the client to help them maintain symmetry and stay completely open and trusting throughout the experience.  Obviously, this only works with guides who are practiced at staying symmetrical and working in this energetic manner.  Currently, I am the only such provider that I personally know of who is able to work with people at this level of energetic unity and openness.

When seated, legs should be kept open.  Think of how small children sit.  They never cross their legs as most adults do (who are much more thoroughly entrenched in their egos and energy patterns).  They sit with the soles of their feet touching in front of them, making a diamond shape with their legs.  This is an ideal and symmetrical seating position.  Sitting with crossed legs in lotus or meditation posture is not effective for maintaining symmetry or experiencing full energetic openings.  If lying down, legs should be slightly open and never crossed.  Arms should be kept open with palms up, either on one's lap, or by one's side.  This is what I consider the "neutral" position.  Whenever you find yourself breaking symmetry, return to this position (either seated, or laying down).  If you find yourself moving in bilateral symmetry, go for it -- but don't think about it.  Just feel your way through the movement and breathing.  Any time your break symmetry, however, return to the neutral position and wait for the energy to move you.

While maintaining symmetry, it is most effective to set one's resolve to not act from one's ego.  This means choosing not to move, speak, or do anything "normal" during the course of the medicine session.  When the ego is "quiet" and not acting out, it is much easier for one to feel the flow of symmetrical energy that is the source of being.  Once that genuine energy opens up and starts to flow, movement, vocalizing, and other activities are common.   However, these are not the actions of ego.  They are the actions of genuine energy.  Experiencing the difference is the first step in learning how to recognize the difference between ego energy (self-constructed illusion) and genuine energy (reality) in all contexts, not just entheogenic sessions.  This, however, is where it begins.

I have been told that yoga originally developed from spontaneous, fluid, symmetrical movement.  It is also highly likely that yoga developed as a system of techniques to mimic the entheogenic experience (meaning that use of entheogens was historically precedent and yoga a later derivative).  Whatever the roots, various yoga traditions, as they are practiced today within Hindu and Buddhist cultures, are a far cry from fluid, symmetrical movements.  Most yoga and meditation postures, both within and without the trantric traditions, are either asymmetrical in nature, or feature crossed legs, arms, or hands and fingers.  This is a clear indication that these traditions are not fully tapping into the nature of genuine energy but are still dealing with contrived, egoic projections of energy.  Keep in mind, again, that a full energy opening naturally comes with bilateral symmetry in one's energy and body.  The fact that these traditions don't teach bilateral symmetry indicates, by necessity, that they do not teach about full energetic openings.  Given that a deep level of awareness and understanding of one's energetic nature as a bilaterally symmetrical being is necessary for a genuine experience of reality, any tradition that teaches "enlightenment" or "awakening" through asymmetrical postures is simply missing the mark and still embedded in ego and the energetic constructs of ego.  This is a simple energetic reality. 

Opening to the full potential of entheogenic experience means going beyond what religious and spiritual traditions are able to offer.  Meditation and yoga are certainly effective means for altering consciousness, and can help produce better health, wellbeing, and personal happiness and clarity.  However, they are limited and are often structurally asymmetrical.  Moving into spontaneous symmetry means moving beyond all the confines and structures of all the products of the ego, including our most cherished spiritual traditions.  Working with entheogens is a different modality than meditation and yoga, and therefore is in need of its own methodologies.  While there is some overlap, the differences are significant.  As practical energetic tools, entheogens make a level of clarity and liberation available that nothing else can provide.  They are the method.  Everything else is a substitute and imitation.

 

Taking Responsibility

Using entheogens and having "mystical" experiences are fundamentally useless if one is not seeking to integrate their experience of energy into everyday, ordinary reality, and working to take responsibility for the self here and now.  The truth of our being comes with both tremendous freedom and tremendous responsibility.  Given that each individual is an embodiment of the One, right here and right now, how that individual chooses to be and act is completely a personal choice.  All individuals can be true to themselves and their genuine energy, or not.  It is always a personal choice.  All choices come with consequences.  That is reality.  Each one of us is a fully autonomous version of the Unitary Energy Being.  Everyone is God, and God is energy.  That's pretty liberating.

This fundamental truth resolves all existential, spiritual, and metaphysical questions.  Any system of belief or "knowledge" that claims that a human being is anything less than a full and complete embodiment of God is an ego-generated illusion, pure and simple.  That means that virtually nothing of what any religion has to say bares any real weight or value for humans - they are fantasy systems.  It also means that no one has a soul to save, a mind stream to evolve, or some other perfected world or state to get to.  Reality, as we experience it, here now, on Planet Earth, is what God is doing.  This is it.  Any talk about "other realms" and "higher states of being" is pure nonsense and promotes ego-generated irresponsibility and illusion.  This is it, so get real.

It also means that if you want to "wake up" or "be enlightened," all you have to do is relax your ego and let your energy open up, and then learn how to take full responsibility for yourself and your ego.  The most effective means for doing so is using entheogens, but this is a practice that applies to every moment of every day.  We are continually presented with opportunities to either act from a place of genuine energy, or act from a place of egoic attachment, projection, fear, and desire.  Since so many people have no idea what that difference is, it can be hard to begin.  It comes down to something simple, however: the truth.  When you chose to act from a place of energetic truth (not "truth" in the sense of what you think you know), you act with genuine energy.

Unfortunately, egos use all kinds of methods to avoid acting from genuine energy.  It is very rare that people give themselves permission to "be themselves," and even if they do want to give themselves that permission, they probably have no idea who they actually are or what "being themselves" means.  Egos are firmly attached to their sense of identity and don't want to give it up.  Egos hold onto culture, religion, tradition, politics, the teachings of their beloved icons, and all manner of ideas of right and wrong, good and bad, proper and improper, to structure how they choose to identify and express energy.  In an attempt to "fit in" to a society, culture, family, etc., an ego takes on the patterns and projections of the other egos around it.  Children quickly learn how to mimic and master the ego games their parents and community members model for them.  They learn how to identify and believe.  They learn how to curb their natural energies to "fit in" and "be a good person," generally according to local, and ultimately relative, standards.  Ego then gets attached to all of these ideas, practices, and patterns, as that's how it makes sense of itself and its world.

Genuine energy that is not released authentically will always find other ways to try and escape and discharge, or will force ego to create more and more elaborate energetic structures to try and hold it in and sublimate it.  For example, humans are sexual creatures.  Sexuality and all that comes with it is a natural part of our energetic make-up and is something that needs to be expressed in order to have a healthy, balanced energy.  Most religions place all kinds of bizarre restrictions and taboos on sex and sexual activity, often placing the strictest requirements on those who would get "close to God" or "be holy".  This is highly distorting of natural human energy, however, and the consequences can be severe, such as with epidemics of celibate Catholic priests sexually abusing young boys.  In the eastern tantric traditions (tantric traditions as currently practiced in the West have almost no actual relationship to traditional eastern tantric practices), sexual energy is recognized as a means of altering consciousness, but ever there, sex has been turned into a largely symbolic and mental process.  While tantric practitioners may have avoided the abuse problems of Catholics, by making sex a mental, as opposed to genuine physical, process, tantrics are not fully engaging with their full spectrum of energy and are operating more in their minds than their bodies.  In other words, these practices are tending to push them into rarified and sublimated "mystical," ideational realities, rather than living in actual reality, here and now, in their bodies, in their lives, and with their genuine sexual energy.

So we are all free to choose how we think, what we "believe," and how we act.  All of these choices bring consequences.  Choices that are made with clarity and centeredness in regards to one's energy are choices that bring the best possible results for the individual because they are in alignment with reality, rather than what we choose to think or believe about reality.  Genuine energy is often in complete disagreement with egoic energy, however, so making choices authentically can be difficult.  Operating from genuine energy means not being concerned about what others think of one's choices or actions.  Choices are made and actions are undertaken because the individual understands that such choices and actions are authentic for them at that time, and living true to one's self means being true to one's awareness of energy.  When this is lived fully and completely, there is no one to blame and no one can claim to be a victim.  Reality has its natural limits and consequences: this is the nature of energy.  But within the possibilities presented to us, we are always free to choose.  We can conform to what others expect of us, or what our ego expects of us, or what we know is true for ourselves because we are fully aware of the presence of our genuine energy in our body and what it is asking of us.

 

Trust and Liberation

It all comes down to trust; trust of the self, trust of one's life and one's energy.  Its as simple as trusting your heart beat, or trusting your breath, and trusting that when you act in congruence with your heart, you know you've made the right decision for yourself, no matter what the consequences.  In the end, what we're talking about is liberation from fear.  Liberation from fear of being oneself.  Liberation from the fear of reality.  Liberation from the fear of life and the fear of death.  Liberation from the fear of succeeding or failing.  Liberation from trying and relaxing into infinite nature of being, right here, right now. 

Only you can trust that you can be yourself and take the responsibility and courage to live your true energy.

 

Image by Felipe Venancio, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

Interesting

Thanks for the interesting article. I also read your "5-Meo-DMT" User's Guide". I have used 5-Meo-DMT a few times, but generally by the time I'm finished holding the first hit (only about 5mg worth - all I can hold), I am too far into the experience to take another hit. Too bad it can't be ingested. Even squeezing in two quicker hits (probably still under 10mg total) has not been enough for a "full release", though certainly enough to dissolve my consciousness into a dream-like, unfocused, ego-less, dissociated state for 15-20 minutes, where I experience kaleidoscopic patterns as thought/meaning, but which cannot translate to the "normal" waking, separate identity. Deep, certainly, but so far, not transformative or healing. I'm curious if you have ever experienced Ibogaine; I would like to, based on what I have read about it, but I have not had the opportunity. Peace, Rasha

Considering that Iboga tends to induce contact with ancestors

and other spirits, it might seriously challenge your paradigm, Martin. I suggest not shaking up the sturdy ground you believe yourself to be on ;)

pretty sure that was

pretty sure that was addressed in the article.  what I understood of his opinion of the ancestors was that they're merely constructs of the ego.

exactly, something I think Iboga would put into

question. 

Insightful, ironic, bold

The analysis of ego-constructs here is spot on, even brilliant (and at the very least it corresponds to my own experiences).

But given Bell's attack on belief in projected narratives, it's curious that he goes on to present his speculative model of reality as if it's absolute fact. 

 "Unitary Energy Being"? That's just a belief. Just because one has an expansive sense of self doesn't mean one has unlocked the key to everything in existence. Seems to me Bell gets a little ahead of himself here. How does he know that there is not much more to existence that he may still be simply unaware of? On what basis can he so cavalierly reject "other realms", for instance? Sure, he's right that our beliefs in such things tend to be shared ego projections. But that doesn't mean that all of reality is limited to what Bell has personally experienced.

I admire Bell's striving for objectivity. But from an objective perspective, it's clear that his "objective" epistemology-ontology remains as yet partly subjective (even if it promises to erase the object-subject distinction).

Anyway, lots of good food for thought here. And refreshingly bold. Thanks!

Addressing the man

I find that this article lacked a certain heart space.

IT lacked the power of LOVE that comes from someone who has truly realized "The Nature of True Reality". I did find it however, extremely intellectually stimulating and raises some amazing concepts that challenge a wide variety of views! Thanks!

I also found the Energy to be very self-validating... ( "I got it all figured out" ) but the style and overall energy struck me as un-integrated... Especially the section that dismisses all other methods of raising the kundalini energy as unnecessary... except for entheogeons. I find this terribly ignorant and self righteous. (*I'm all for plant medicine to raise consciousness etc. for me its not a matter of one or the other... but BOTH... systems like yoga, qi gong, bio-energetics etc. are SCIENCES that work with our totality and should not be so easily dismissed). I find statements like this and the over all article reflections of someone who has opened their 3rd eye, mistaking and/or implying themselves as "enlightened"; but has not opened their Heart center.... (true enlightenment so to speak)

Martin strikes me as a brilliant philosopher, and rational deductionist... Not at mystic (not that he's claiming to be one)... But the very content of his arguments to me... are surrounding the mystic. "What is reality, and what is illusion; for me has more to do with mysticism that intellectualism because.... THERE IS A GREAT MYSTERY THAT SURROUNDS THOSE QUESTIONS!!!! SO to have a phillosopher over address... REDUCE ...Disvalidate so many traditions and systems down to some fundamental irrationality is itself completely egoistic in its function. A philosopher can never be a mystic.... Because he is attached to his own view or belief (illusion) and is not living fully in the awe and the mystery... but perhaps has reduced it all to some 6th chakra ANSWER... OR is still looking for THAT answer... and/ OR using his energy to validate his view hehe.

"Philosophy is just intellectual gymnastics, it has nothing to do with reality. It talks, argues, creates magnificent systems of thought, but it does not change the man who is creating all this. He remains the same man."

With warmth...

~Alokananda

 

"When the power of LOVE overwhelms the love of power, the world will know peace" - J.H

 

 

"When the power of LOVE overwhelms the love of power, the world will know peace" - J.H

Indeed

I couldn't have said it better. All this talk of feeling the ultimate energy of the endless endlessness, yet he is obviously not speaking from this space (at least from what is being registered with my nervous system). Of course this is just speaking of his ego - and maybe this is just how he chooses to express himself. However, something in me doubts that somewhat so "liberated" would choose to be so cocky...or rather, that God would.

That's just what my ego was thinking...

The "entheogens" are not helping you speak from your heart - that's what the Unitary Energy Being says  through me.

 

Interesting work that you do though, thanks for all the energy you put out into seeking TRUE understanding.

You said it far better than I would..

Exactly my thoughts, so I'd like to thank Martin W. Ball  as well for the refreshing article.

 

energenerally speaking...

My silence is broken. Your silence speaks volumes.

Intelligent, but still based in subjective belief

This essay was enjoyable in the sense that many of us academics stumble upon bits and pieces of evidentiary being through the use of entheogens. Mr. Ball’s writing style and opinions are engaging and intelligent, yet still speculative. For example, in the section on consciousness, Mr. Ball states, “Another way of saying this is that all of reality is alive and aware and this property is uniquely expressed in biological beings but is not a product of their biological system.” How does he know this? What makes this statement fact? Mr. Ball does not say. Regarding Terrence McKenna’s lectures on the DMT experience, of course those were the DMT experience as modified and interpreted through ego, but ego alone is not enough to negate universal or collective expression, which we may as well call reality. For example, McKenna’s self-replicating machine elves were not invented by McKenna, it is just that McKenna was the first (European-descended) individual to describe these expressions as such. I have experienced similar clonal “elven” type entities under the influence of salvia divinorum. I would never have thought to call them “self-replicating machine elves,” I have referred to them in my writings as “totem pole” beings. But the term “self-replicating machine elf” actually works, in as much as I can relate to what McKenna was seeing. But, it’s not just me, either. These visions are wide spread in the entheogenic state, if not universal (which, by all accounts, they appear to be). Since we find so many commonalities in the entheogenic experience, as shared by the multitudes who write about their own experiences, we can, indeed, draft a road map to these psychic experiences. Granted, as all perception is an active, creative engagement with reality, all experiential accounts will differ. However, if you and I ride the same bus, we will encounter the same landscape. It is only our individual perspectives and history that will make the narrative sound different. We may both photograph the same tree. It is not the tree that has changed, even if our photographs show a slightly different picture. This camera is the self, the lens is the ego, the film is the brain. Whether we process in black & white, color, or even negative, solarized, posterized, or pointillized, the reality of the tree is captured on film. Thus it is with the entheogenic experience, which is only one part ego, three parts alternate reality.

Really?

I am surprised that Reality Sandwich has put up another post from Martin Ball. The response to his previous essay seemed to me, for the most part, to be that this community really isn't that interested in the perspective of 'The Entheological Paradigm'.

 

And, where I suppose my surprise comes from, is that with all the feedback in the previous post, there was not a single personal response by Martin to any of the comments. Yet, now he is going ahead with another essay, purveying at a further depth the ideas of his own perspective and experiences without addressing the tone and feeling of his work that the RS community picked up on: cold analysis, uncompassionate criticism, and a seeming arrogant ignorance towards majikal realms and otherworldly beings.

 

The energy of 'The Entheological Paradigm' reminds me much of Ken Wilber and his perspective that primitive peoples are unable to separate their Mind from Nature, that this is a less evolved state of consciousness. I'm all for RS giving folks like Martin a chance; he got it, the community responded, and now we continue to give him a podium for his preachings...  Really?

Well..

It's much better to have these vivid discussions than to have soporific articles where everyone says "ah-men". Martin's article is one of the very few I read here on RS in a long time, and the comments are very enlightening as well. More please!

What discussions?

"these vivid discussions"

But that's exactly what IS NOT happening.  Ball has not engaged in the discussions spurred by his previous essay at all and this one does not acknowledge any of the myriad valid criticisms offered either, except to say that he 'expected the backlash.'  I corresponded with him offline to ask why he has not joined in or defended himself and all he said was that everyone who disagreed with him was only suffering from their own "ego's" and didn't deserve a response.    (I'm paraphrasing... the way he said it was MUCH more arrogant.)   

 I completely agree with Scott Fraser above in his disbelief that Reality Sandwich would publish another essay by this mean-spirited megalomaniac that has so thoroughly revolted the Reality Sandwich readership in his previous entry.   

 What's the deal Reality Sandwich???   Did he pay you to help promote his own work?

Let me unpack the most interesting quote:

"These realities can either be confusing realms of bizarre otherness, or can take on a more archetypal, educational quality where the ego experiences things as being revealed to it by guides and entities. These are all projections of the self, however, and are a method for the self to communicate with itself through simultaneous multiple role playing (similar to dreams in that the dreamer only egoically identifies with one perspective within a dream but is in fact all the characters and the total environment)."

 So the entities are all projections of the (S)elf, in other words, it's all God and there is no other, even in hyperspace. Is this what you mean Martin? I thought in the other article you were saying that McKenna's DMT visions were his own ego projections.

Everything is a manifestation of the One Energy Being or God, I can agree with that, but if the entities in hyperspace are merely ego projections, then the entities known as Martin Ball or Daniel Pinchbeck, who I've seen in face to face reality, must also be my own ego projections... right?

In other words, how can you say that entities in other dimensions aren't autonomous, real beings, whereas you and I are real? We on earth live in just one dimension of many. How can you say that beings here are real, yet those in other dimensions are not? Perhaps you're saying that beings here, are not really real, and are in some sense constructs, or projections of God, which I can agree with (I think).

I wonder... have you ever spoken with a full body channeled being? I have. They claimed to have been incarnated on earth before. Ervin Laszlo talks about people communicating with those who have crossed over. Are these ego projections? I was talking with the channeled being with 12 other people in the room - whose ego was projecting it?

I think you have to afford the possibility of autonomous beings in other dimensions, that are just as real as the beings in this one, even if all of us are limited perspectives or constructs, waking up to our divine nature, through time and space.

Finally, you're dreaming analogy is shaky. Robert Wagner, author of "Lucid Dreaming: Gateway to the Inner Self" is not so convinced that all characters in the dream are merely projections. How can you be so sure that you are not talking with autonomous beings? (in a lucid dream) He describes instances of dreamers gaining information that is later verified, which they could not have known. If it's all inside their heads, how could this be the case?

As McKenna was fond of saying, reality is not merely stranger than we suppose, it's stranger than we CAN suppose. To verify this, I suggest loading a pipe anything more than 200mg of DMT and seeing what happens...

There is no Ball

Excellent comments JMT. I too wondered about Ball's certainty that there are no other beings or other "levels" of reality apart from the one we talking chimps can perceive with our limited faculties. First off, you have the testimony of McKenna and hundreds of others (documented by Rick Strassman) that they encountered some sort of "Others" in their experiences with DMT. (Strassman notes in his book on DMT that this was one of the more surprising results, and that he has had difficulty fitting it into his explanatory frame.) Of course Dr. Ball simply uses his procrustean methodology to lop off these testimonies as ego-based and so therefore unworthy of taking seriously. Second, you have millennia of human experiences of non-human "Others" -- whether animal and plant spirits, ancestors, angels, or dralas. My guess is that Ball, like Ken Wilber, regards these "pre-rational" perspectives as unworthy of taking seriously, based on the a priori assumption that since most of us no longer "believe in" (or experience) these beings that they therefore do not and never have existed.  

Mahayana Buddhism provides a cool insight into this dilemma. According to the doctrine of the Trikaya, it is said that there are three bodies of the Buddha:

  1. at one end we have the Nirmanakaya (i.e., physical manifestations of awakening, e.g. the historical Buddha)
  2. at the other is the Dharmakaya (i.e., the Absolute Buddhanature, which we could also call "Godhead")
  3. while in the middle we have the whole range of "virtual" Buddhas and bodhisattvas who comprise the Sambhogakaya.

This doctrine is rooted in the understanding that, in some sense, these divisions and distinctions are simply heuristic devices which allow us to make sense of our total range of experiences in light of the Buddhist notion of "emptiness." For modern Westerners studying Buddhism, "emptiness" seems like a good way to avoid believing in those "Others," the mythical beings that constitute the Sambhogakaya. When you ask a Tibetan lama if those various beings are real, the lama will usually say, "No, of course not, they are empty of intrinsic existence." Then the lama will chuckle and remind the questioner, "But then again, that holds true of you and me too."

Ha, well put, that's what I was looking for

the beings in hyperspace seem real, the beings on earth seem real, but in the last analysis, all concepts of separate being, are but smoke in the clutch of a dissolving hand, to paraphrase Alan Watts. 

Boing boing synchronicity?

Interesting piece from Boing Boing involving the self-transforming machine elves...

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/10/20/death-holds-no-sting.html

-

It seems like the majority of people commenting here didn't even bother to read the whole article.

Entities or realities experienced through entheogenic experience are both egoic projections and 'God'. Martin states that God is a fractal energetic system that is everything. Hence, any egoic projections are also manifested from this energy, however the structure of the energy is being influenced by your ego.
Additionally, Martin says that the primary function of entheogens is that they alter our ability to perceive and experience energy. Hence any realities or entities encountered are expressions of energy. At this point, the concept of "real" deteriorates. These entities cannot be defined in our reality by the spatial and temporal dimension, hence they do not "exist" in reality. However they do exist as expressions of pure energy.


There are also many posts here that say that Martin is arrogant and is hypocritical by criticising McKenna about his subjective experiences then basing this essay upon his own. When I first discovered Martin's work, I also thought that he came off as rather arrogant. However, this is simply your own ego rebelling against ideas that go against fundamental concepts that many of us have thought of as true since birth. Arrogance is defined as "overbearing pride evidenced by a superior manner toward inferiors". Many of Martin's ideas make us feel inferior because our understanding of ourselves and reality is being questioned. All I can suggest is to read his work making sure that your ego is not hindering you in your understanding or analysis of it.


Secondly, although Martin's theory is completely based upon his own subjective experience, he clearly states that "it can be confirmed directly by anyone willing to go through a rigorous process of self-discovery and analysis through highly specific entheogenic methods". Such is true for any idea, whether it is fact or theory. For example, given that 2x + 3 = 4, x=0.5. Subjectively I believe this to be true, however it can also be confirmed by anyone else that wishes to do so.

General semantics...

I think this discussion would benefit greatly from integrating one of Robert Anton Wilson's principal theses, specifically the awareness of the hazards of the verb "to be" (is, are, was, were, etc) especially in its "identity" usage. In most situations, substituting "seems" or "appears" allows a writer to present an opinion as such without appearing to make an authoritarian statement of "fact." I find it quite challenging to write this way myself, and in practice some casual use of "to be" not terribly dangerous, but it does seem to clear up some confusion in communication. Wilson wrote the book "Quantum Psychology" entirely without using any form of "to be" if anyone's interest in piqued by this idea. I felt that this article's dismissal of Buddhism, particularly, exemplified this weakness in the English language and illustrates the challenge that western minds have in understanding eastern philosophy in general. Just my 2 cents...

Piled High and Deep

Quote 1: "The gist of the article was that what Terence described as the 'DMT experience' should more properly be described as 'Terence's DMT experience'..."

 

Quote 2: "The Entheological Paradigm is...the product of my personal exploration into myself, and the conclusions I was forced to reached about the nature of the self and the nature of reality. Despite having reached these conclusions subjectively, I argue that they are in fact universal. In other words, I am claiming to have discovered the genuine truth about the nature of the self and the nature of reality. This is not 'my' belief system, nor is it 'just my perspective.'"

 

So the results of McKenna's personal explorations into himself, "using entheogenic tools," are only valid to the extent that they were Terence's experiences and so cannot be generalizable, BUT Dr. Ball's experiences using entheogenic tools are not merely a reflection of Ball's "ego" but are the "genuine truth"? Uh-huh. Sounds a lot like my fundamentalist Christian family's approach to other faiths: "They just have superstitions created by Satan, whereas we have the genuine truth."

 

I also wonder just how much Buddhism (or any other religion) Dr. Ball studied on his way to his "Piled Higher and Deeper" credential. He apparently thinks he is the first scholar to ever ponder the paradoxical nature of the Nikaya Buddhist notions of no-self and rebirth. One wonders if he has even heard of the Prajnaparamitahridya Sutra with its assertion that, "form is emptiness and emptiness also is form, form is no other than emptiness, emptiness no other than form." That sutra, and the whole body of Prajnaparamita and tantric literature, are dedicated to undercutting (in Ball's phrase) "egoic attachment to the idea of individual spiritual and conscious evolution," and, "egoic idea[s] of some kind of end 'release' or 'extinguishing....'"

 

Ball also apparently overlooks the Mahayana assertion that there is "no difference between samsara and nirvana," when he asserts this tautology as if it were profundity: "Any notion of getting 'out' of reality is pure ego-fantasy." How about the ego-fantasy of having discovered the-way-out-that-is-not-a-way-out?

 

Others on this thread and on Dr. Ball's previous posts have pointed out other problems with Ball's "view that is not a view." I have no problem with Ball challenging McKenna or the Buddha or anyone else. He, like the rest of us, has the right to share his thoughts on these important matters. His assertion that he has seen through veils that were heretofore impenetrable and has arrived at the genuine universal truth leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Like I said earlier, I've heard that song before. It always ends on a sour note.

well.

It must be cool to be the only human in the history of humanity to have discovered the true nature of reality. Anyway. While I can't float with the One and Only Messiah tone going on here I think Mr. Ball you have some very interesting and provocative observations and ideas. I appreciate your emphasis on the value of working with symbolic content in reference to ego-construct, not because nothing else exists--I personally have no idea what exists and what doesn't, in an ultimate sense--but actually in a more utilitarian sense, because interpreting content in reference to egoic identity, illusions, attachments and grandiose schemes can give us something real and immediate to do, clearing out a lot of emotional and mental crap that is definitely standing in the way of our connection to truth, whatever the hell truth is. As in, well, if you want to do something about it already, you may not ever know if that ominous sorceress type in your last trip was a "real independent being" or not but you might want to give a thought as to how you haven't truly forgiven your dead mother and how it might be related to why you're always screaming at your girlfriend. (It's like a win-win anyway because you get to patch things up with your old lady--both of them, actually--and also on the off-chance that the sorceress is the real deal maybe at least the honorable effort will scare her off from coming back round to eat your brain. You gotta hope at least some of these otherworldlies have some good old fashioned values.) P.S. Sean B. I thought your reply was quite insightful.

Why are you trying to convince us?

Dear Martin,

I find many of your observations to be insightful, and it seems clear to me that your explorations have been personally transformative. Thank you for sharing your truth.

Your style, however, is quite prickly--full of sharp edges, untoward advances, and an acrid, dogmatic taste. I dare say you've succeeding already in alienating a portion of your potential audience, not only from you but from your ideas and whatever aspects of Truth they may contain.

Any thoughts on integrating the ego, befriending it, playing it like a harp?! This area of inquiry seems curiously absent from your research. Do you find any value in your ego? Is there room for anything new in your paradigm?

Yours in the seeking,

Jfish

yeah, like the man says

double post

yeah, like the man says

where is the love of ART? sure objectivity is great mr Ball, but like Jfish suggests, are you taking the ego too seriously? what's wrong with having fun with the illusion like Da Vinci or Dali would? After all, all illusions are REAL illusions and have some FUNction in the universe, eh?

Well put Jfish

or similarly, what's wrong with the story, the illusion, the dream? Doesn't it have the purpose of God exploring all different perspectives that will eventually lead to awakening, in all its myriad forms?

Body position

 

 

 

Interesting notes on body position Martin, I too have noticed something very similar to your "energetic opening" & "symmetry". 

 

 

While I haven't felt the need to be "spread-eagled", staying supine definately has been to stay open, connected, egoless. Hands gently folded on chest or hands behind head has been fine. In these states as soon as I have shifted postion or turned away the openness has been lost and the ego/self has returned. The change in mindset has been instantaneous & dramatic to say the least.

 

Nice to know I haven't been the only one, thanks.

 

 

tricks

I still think this is all about Mr Ball, his initial thrust was to attack Terence, his tactic now, is to imagine that he holds some original position against the other(Terence).And that somehow he will gather some following, over and above that of Terence.The content of his arguments is to my sight just regurgitated counterpoints and because of his DMT experiences, to declare that his position is now sacrosanct.he just don't get it Terence is not reduced by his argument. It only shows how vital and vibrant Terence was, regardless of certain phrases that can never be reduced to mere, split hairs, of ego or entity.

everyone but myself is wrong in their beliefs.

cool story bro.

An acknowledgement and a critique of Ball's "The Entheological P

Martin Ball has made a few very bold claims and has taken great care to communicate his ideas with rationality so I must acknowledge much of the truth that he highlights as well as contradict many false assumptions he makes since he makes his statements with such a hard and certain truth value (no practitioner of e-prime he :) so I shall compliment him in his style and request that he respond to these valid critiques of his system (since we know he reads these comments, will he participate with us then?)

 

1.) 'The Entheological Paradigm' is far from the only system to note the role of symmetry in relationship to increased awareness and understanding both physically and energetically. The claim made is a little misinformed or confused about other systems and is a play on words.

Clearly 'balance' is a very key idea for certain in Taoist arts (such as taiji, qi kung, etc) Aikido (where symmetry is everywhere to be found). Note how much symmetry is expressed in Egyptian Hieroglyphics. Although such ancient systems may have not used objective language such a 'bi-lateral symmetry' many eastern practices stress balance and I personally have had many teachers who stress the term 'symmetry' in these areas. So this claim he makes is a little over the top.

 

 2.) I love the way he embraces, in a very tantric way , objective reality, or the reality comprised of matter and energy. Since he strives for objectivity, I assume he defines matter and energy the same way science does. However he is making the same error he is accusing every other philosophy in the world other than his own of making. His philosophy to is asymmetrical. He does not see the world of 'illusion' as part of a natural symmetry with the world of the 'actual', nor does he see the world of the 'ego' (which is just the realm of the self as he defines it).

Again, he sees this realm of the self (which he calls ego) as something that is preventing attainment or distracting from attainment, tricking itself into existence,  not something that is transcended as a group of others (all of us working it out together to create a better world for all of us).

He does not see that even the phrase 'One being' itself is an irrational illusion which DOES NOT EXIST and itself a creative projection of the self.

 

hell, even objective science now is scratching it's head because our understanding of what constitutes matter and energy is being challenged by Dark Matter and Dark Energy, which also does not exist (is illusion) yet keeps the entire universe in order.

 

It's very lonely, his path, there is no real self no real others, just ONE being. No symmetry here:( just ONE being playing with him self, i mean herself , i mean ....see what I mean? it's another irrational illusion and he should know this since he seeks objectivity and ruthless honesty.

"The Entheological Paradigm" needs more honest reflection and LOVE. Too many claims of Truth, not enough honest reflection of the MYSTERY.

Martin Ball, I believe you are close but have one final step to take before claims you make can actually enter the 'True' department. I look forward to hearing more of your arguments in the future.

excellent work

Its about time questions of ontology and epistemology were addressed. One can rigorously and reflectively addresses topics such as psychedelics without having to dismiss them as pseudo-science or mysticism. The fact that mainstream thought refused to address these issues points out their inability to grapple or even explain a psychedelic experience without dismissing it entirely as 'illusion' or reducing it to neuro-chemical reactions. There are traditions of addressing these issues with the same rigor one find in academic circles but without dismissing them. I would cite Walter Benjamin's work "On Hasish" as one such example of a 'serious' (I'm using that word loosely) academic who attempted to make sense of such experiences. There clearly needs to be work done developing such a field and building a tradition of thinkers who are willing to step outside of 'norm-centric' reality and explore new modes and means of explaining experience.

Fantastic article !!

First off, reality sandwich is about free expression of ideas, and I for one am appalled how some of you are claiming Martin shouldn't contribute simply because the "majority" don't dig his ideas. psssh

I really like the direction of allowing for the experience of "the energy" to guide a proper yoga practice. I too came to similar conclusions and definitely believe that yoga was originally intended to reverse engineer the entheogenic experience.

I do have a question though....

If the entheogenic experience is simply giving the experience of "God" then why do shamanic cultures, such as the mestizo culture of the amazon, use ayahuasca induced states for so many "egoic" purposes? If the experience is simply opening one up to "the divine" why would a majority of mestizo shamans be brujos, or sorcerers?

this site bites

you know what matters more than this article or any of your comments? everything... and i mean that in the best possible sense

'aeon a minute...

The Universe is a child at play with Martin Ball.

I think it's only fair that

I think it's only fair that some here have taken Mr. Ball to task for his implicit egoism. More importantly, what will poor folks like me do who have no access to entheogens to expand their consciousness? I guess I will have to do it the hard way, with meditation and yoga and practicing love.

and now

an advertisement for springforestqigong.Yeah, gigong has certainly gotten big.But you know springforest is not cheap.You can pick some beginner stuff up on YouTube, or Ebay.And so back to Transhumanism, and the wonderful world of instant enlightenment.Soon we will not need DMT or gigong, or quotes from James Joyce, or William James.Yes, super DMT will be just a linguistic object away, you will not need to hurt your knees meditating, or be blown away by that blast of DMT smoke.You will be in Shangri-gri la la land and Shambhala-bla-bla with the non machine Bozo's in the back of the omnibus of Art, by the flick of your brain-chip mouse.Just follow the bouncing ball or orb.

Pablo Amaringo, Rudolf Steiner

Forget which of the early quantum pioneers said the opposite of a profound truth is another profound truth. In other words when you try and use language to describe the outer limits of human experience you are automatically in the realm of paradox. Fundamentalists don't like this; they want things to be just 'one way' - their way. Martin Ball has some interesting things to say but his overall message comes across with the flavour of humorless fundamentalism to me. Terrance, on the other hand, was a bardic leprechaun in tune with paradox and the 'cosmic giggle'. I have deep respect for Rudolf Steiner, went to a Waldorf School for eleven years followed by two years Emerson College, Sussex, UK a Steiner college of higher education. The guy was emphatic that the universe and nature is populated by discarnate beings and spirits. Was he a nutcase or a deeply gifted seer? After many years on the path of plant spirit shamanism I have to agree with Steiner from my own experience. I have been up close and personal with nature spirits, angels, the etheric Christ, Ganesh, Vishnu and on one memorable journey, the Godhead, the Central Sun of the universe, Empyrean Fire. (That one blew my socks off). I feel very fortunate to have had a lengthy conversation with Pablo Ameringo in his Pucallpa studio in 2009 just a few months before he died. He graciously took the time to explain his cosmology which was remarkably similar to that of Steiner's. He said that everything in nature and the universe is conscious and teeming with life, just not necessarily on the physical level. He said spirits and entities are everywhere if you only but have the eyes to see. It's what he was always striving to communicate via his art. He also said Christ is absolutlely central to the whole sweep of human history just as Steiner always maintained.  (Not the Christ of organized religion  -  something much deeper).

Come back, Martin

I understand all your rage... and the fractally fractured ego.

But you have to feel so lonely and scared, up there in the mountain...

Come back Martin, we are waiting for you here, by the valley: ecstatic love and wild laughter breaking open the heart to a blissful web of relationships sharing the same essential identity: the inexhaustible Mystery of the One and the Many...

"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson

 

Liberation

Hi Martin,

 

what an nice and extensive summary of your thoughts on reality that you have made - thank you for sharing!

 

I must say that, just like many here, I find your words full of a need to prove yourself "right" - "full of your ego" in lack of a better expression. But then again, it is just natural to be exited with your insights and unique POW in the beginning of the path of liberation which you write about. I was a bit surprised to read that you think you have arrived at these conclusions through a purely subjective experience, from which you mean you have seen reality as it is - yet you mean that on the other hand you mean that Buddha was influenced by the culture of his time, which clouded his vision.

The way you describe the enthogen experience, the liberation of the ego, the Oneness and the fractal patterns of the Universe (etc) are very common ways of looking upon these things at this moment in time. To me your experience seem very influenced by the current cultural setting and thoughts, but of course, you might not be aware of this influence. Personally I do not for a second hold the ideas you describe as a "truth" which can be experienced "by all" because this is "the way things are" like you say, but more a viewpoint of the "truth" as many people see it under the influence of the currently most popular cultural and scientific paradigms. And it is very important to be aware of these influences on your entheogen journeys, as well as any other paradigm/idea/behaviour pattern/etc that influence how you experience reality. Still, I find your summary of these thought currents very well made, and of course unique, but this is just natural in my POW, since I (like many others) see every being as a unique part of GodGoddess.

 

I must also say that I am very surprised to read that someone so insightful as yourself but who only started a dedicated entheogen journey just 3 years ago (if I understand you correctly) actually takes others for medicine journeys - you might want to wait a bit with that =)

 

On one point I feel have to correct you - as far as I know, Kundalini is not even traditionally really seen as separated from our physical being. I recommend this book "Journey into consciousness" by Charles Breaux for more info on this point, you can find it on Google Books

 

In the end, what I want to say to you and many others - I wish you to feel free from being "right", from finding a new paradigm which will fit "for all". According to my POW, we desperately need to accept that WE KNOW NOTHING - and I believe that the only "Being" who can "know it all" is All That Is, the "Unitary Energy Being" as you call it - I sometimes call it GoddessGod/GodGoddess or Existence And Beyond, or simply, All That Is. And I believe that none of the parts of this "Being" can see the whole picture of What Is, so none of us can be "right" about anything, and we do not have to be. Coming close and sharing your unique interpretation is enough =)

To feel that and truly accept it - and always be careful to express insights with this in mind - is real liberation to me.

 

Take care, and be careful!

With love/ Susan

 

on life and living I accept that the answer to the question “who am I?” is eternal

Free expression, of course... Featured Material?

" First off, reality sandwich is about free expression of ideas, and I for one am appalled how some of you are claiming Martin shouldn't contribute simply because the "majority" don't dig his ideas. psssh "

 

With his recent post, Martin certainly seems to have received much more positive response then he did previously, and I am feeling more so, now, how this is an appropriate dialogue to happen here on RS. Whereas I suggested that this community was not interested in his ideas, based on what I saw previously, and then surprised by the 'support' of RS by continuing to publish his work, I consider a different and far gentler perspective than what you offer here though, that 'some of us' are opposing his free expression of ideas.

 

I suppose the feeling I get from his work is that I would expect such ideas to appear as a long-winded comment to a less-egoic and more inclusive feature piece about Terence and DMT, rather than be a spotlighted, feature post of the magazine on the subject. Certainly I support that Martin can contribute here, and what I question is RS posting such boldly critical and self-supporting ideas as Martin's for their feature material.

 

That Martin still refrains from giving personal commentary to the communities feedback, alongside the tone of his 'illuminating' and 'truth revealing' analysis, still brings to me the feeling that he is trying to ride this wave of interest in entheogens up on his high horse...

Addressing the Overall and the Man

I find that this article lacked a certain heart space.

IT lacked the power of LOVE that comes from someone who has truly realized "The Nature of True Reality". I did find it however, extremely intellectually stimulating and raises some amazing concepts that challenge a wide variety of views! Thanks!

I also found the Energy to be very self-validating... ( "I got it all figured out" ) but the style and overall energy struck me as un-integrated... Especially the section that dismisses all other methods of raising the kundalini energy as unnecessary... except for entheogeons. I find this terribly ignorant and self righteous. (*I'm all for plant medicine to raise consciousness etc. for me its not a matter of one or the other... but BOTH... systems like yoga, qi gong, bio-energetics etc. are SCIENCES that work with our totality and should not be so easily dismissed). I find statements like this and the over all article reflections of someone who has opened their 3rd eye, mistaking and/or implying themselves as "enlightened"; but has not opened their Heart center.... (true enlightenment so to speak)

Martin strikes me as a brilliant philosopher, and rational deductionist... Not at mystic (not that he's claiming to be one)... But the very content of his arguments to me... are surrounding the mystic. "What is reality, and what is illusion; for me has more to do with mysticism that intellectualism because.... THERE IS A GREAT MYSTERY THAT SURROUNDS THOSE QUESTIONS!!!! SO to have a phillosopher over address... REDUCE ...Disvalidate so many traditions and systems down to some fundamental irrationality is itself completely egoistic in its function. A philosopher can never be a mystic.... Because he is attached to his own view or belief (illusion) and is not living fully in the awe and the mystery... but perhaps has reduced it all to some 6th chakra ANSWER... OR is still looking for THAT answer... and/ OR using his energy to validate his view hehe.

"Philosophy is just intellectual gymnastics, it has nothing to do with reality. It talks, argues, creates magnificent systems of thought, but it does not change the man who is creating all this. He remains the same man."

With warmth...

~Alokananda

 

"When the power of LOVE overwhelms the love of power, the world will know peace" - J.H

From Darwin to Ball

Ball tells us all we need to know - "To put it simply, all of reality is a unified energetic system that is conscious, self-aware, and evolving according to energetic laws. It's actually all quite simple. There is no need to introduce complex metaphysics, religion, or spirituality into the picture. It's a simple energetic reality." I've been worried that reality was simply 'frisky dirt' or 'selfish genes' or 'quarks' or something weird like that. Now that Ball has reduced all of reality to energy I can sleep better. Good thing Ball got rid of his egotistical, er, egoic beliefs - that would just be negative energy, man.

Reductionism

 I think there is something poweful about just stating an idea with out bashing others.                 

I'm weary of anyone that needs to bash or overly crisize other view or thoughts in order to strenthen ones own view. I do feel there is something very true and real about the simplicity of energy and and universal principles... but when its unintegrated through experience...or an open heart it doesn't neccessarily serve anyone. Beliefs are like a pillow for the ego. I"M SAFE. I EXIST! When we embrace a degree of mystery or NOT KNOWING ...I think we live closer to the universe in humility and love.

 

"When the power of LOVE overwhelms the love of power, the world will know peace" - J.H

What a load of ballshit

I think any rational person, when reading the below, would casually walk out of the ballroom after reading this - "Quote 2: "The Entheological Paradigm is...the product of my personal exploration into myself, and the conclusions I was forced to reached about the nature of the self and the nature of reality. Despite having reached these conclusions subjectively, I argue that they are in fact universal. In other words, I am claiming to have discovered the genuine truth about the nature of the self and the nature of reality. This is not 'my' belief system, nor is it 'just my perspective.'" So the results of McKenna's personal explorations into himself, "using entheogenic tools," are only valid to the extent that they were Terence's experiences and so cannot be generalizable, BUT Dr. Ball's experiences using entheogenic tools are not merely a reflection of Ball's "ego" but are the "genuine truth"? Uh-huh. Sounds a lot like my fundamentalist Christian family's approach to other faiths: "They just have superstitions created by Satan, whereas we have the genuine truth." " This guy seems to have hit the nail on the head. ^.^ one also can't help but wonder Ball's intentions, since he clearly is only interested in posting HIS OPINION (which he relentlessly and dogmatically claims is the absolute truth), and is not interested at all in collaborating with others here or answering questions/criticism since he clearly has not responded to 1 COMMENT and ignored all input on either of his last two topics. apparently its his way or the highway. I don't see why he's still posting articles here

"energetic mirroring"

"I am the only such provider that I personally know of who is able to work with people at this level of energetic unity and openness". Mr Ball said that "All true language is incomprehensible, like the chatter of a beggar's teeth" Antonin Artaud said that "Only psychos and shamans create their own reality" Terence Mckenna, said that "And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Nietzsche, said it so energetic mirroring, add the word energetic to mirroring, this is some kind of psychomagic? or is it, highly glorified new age psycho-psychology? is it the Master Game? Is it exchanging minds like Leary spoke of? I recall a practice that I did years ago, called "Creative Conflict, in a meditation community, the practice is outlined in a book written by Chistopher Hills, called Nuclear Evolution.In any case it is all about getting rid of your ego, trouble is the in people in the group always have the less ego. And so it goes.I also recall back in the late 60's people did stuff like this, putting people in the hot seat, and taring down their defenses, it was called sensitivity awareness, ect. "and the magician sits at the table and the holy object of whirling mirrors..." wildthing said that "People today are still living off the table scraps of the sixties. They are still being passed around - the music and the ideas." Bob Dylan said it

Hello Martin...Martin...Martin?

Martin, You've gotten lots of thoughtful responses from the Reality Sandwich community regarding your post. I trust that you've read them all. It may seem to some that a reply on your part is in order. You remind several people of Ken Wilber (me too) in the conviction and absolute certainty of your ideas. I am reminded of one of Ken's answers to his critics that he made after he finally got tired of remaining silent:

 "About once a decade, a portion of the criticism of me and my work gets so lunatic and cacophonous, that some sort of response is demanded. Unlike serious criticism, I try to ignore this kind of stuff, as my record clearly shows, but these folks need to understand that libel and slander are not without costs. Their bill is due. The scholarship in these criticisms is so deranged as to be laughable (or pitiable, it’s hard to say), were it not for the perverse attention it receives, usually from those even less gifted (colossally difficult as that is to imagine). It’s made worse by the fact that if you are perceived, rightly or wrongly, as being the leading figure in a field—as its Wyatt Earp—then every punk with a pistol comes gun-slinging for your ass. (I deliberately used that analogy so some of these critics can make note of the use of nasty, aggressive metaphors.) Still, I’m tired of picking lead out of my butt, and so I’m simply going to have to take a few shots in self-defense. On a personal level, every now and then it gets so bad you just have to blow off steam, because it really hurts, ya know? And like I said, every decade or so, I blow. It’s gotten to the point that one critic cringes when I simply use the word “simply” (as in the previous paragraph), because it means something horrible is going to follow. In this case, true—the horrible thing that followed was this critic’s charge. But simply still, I simply cannot stand this simple criticism of simply anything, let alone “simply,” so simply suck my dick, whaddaya say? http://www.kenwilber.com/blog/show/46

Paradigms and Belief and Symmetry

We can all seemingly act from love and wish to spread a message of love to realize infinite love, as many have described very well, but if that message does not hold within it a sense of compassion for others, and the viewpoints and lessons of others, then are we really fostering what we are endorsing? And can the words and teachings that come from others and from ourselves ever be a cause for integration rather than condemnation and divisiveness? Can the similar threads be woven in harmony allowing for illumination rather than pulled apart into fragments and discarded as irrelevant? Is Unity ever unity if it discounts anything else in favor of itself?

I understand that the disagreement here, as is the case with all other disputes, counterpoints, or whatever anyone would prefer to call them, which will be mentioned here is: a difference in perception which is reflected as accuracy or inaccuracy. And not assuming we’ve all heard or read Blake, “If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite.” But to describe this infinite we, through the faculties of our mind, break it apart, endlessly it seems, into more manageable parts. Otherwise, could we even begin to explain this with language? And an inherent ‘problem’ with language is that interpretations are going to differ, often to extremes, because the conditioning and paradigms which we individually reject or embrace, or our karma, that one undergoes in the course of a lifetime are dictated subjectively from our individual conceptions of what we usually call ‘ego.’

Unlike Mr. Ball, I will readily acknowledge that my response to what he has written has been influenced by "pre-existing religious, philosophical, metaphysical, spiritual, or scientific system(s)." I don't see any reason to throw out the various other’s teachings, ideas, methods, metaphors, musings, or even speculations as to the nature of 'reality.' And while I do agree that there is a single underlying unity of experience, I do not feel it is accurate to claim that there is only one way, path, or vehicle to “reach the other shore," a metaphor taken from teachings of Buddhism. (And to paraphrase this point further, Buddha says that once one reaches the other shore, nirvana, awakening or what have you, to let go of the boat that enabled to cross the river of delusion, lest holding onto that boat will continue to be an obstacle for a continuum of experience in nirvana, awakening, what have you...)

Yet I'm not entirely sure, admitting my own subjectivity in relation to what I'm writing, how one cannot be influenced or conditioned by concepts or paradigms from such teachings from the outset, which in themselves seem to nudge one towards reaching a genuine understanding of 'reality,' whether through science, religion, philosophy, etc. I find this especially puzzling, given that Mr. Ball has readily admitted to having a Ph.D. in religious studies, which through an assumption would also imply a comparative analysis of the various religions, -ologies, -isms, or methods.

I do have a great many questions, and if Mr. Ball is willing, I would sincerely request that he please address some of them, not only from myself, but also the others that have responded to his post entitled, “Energy, Ego, and Entheogens: The Reality of Human Liberation from Illusion.” A lot of what he has to say seems to me very relevant and pertaining to elements of truth, while at other times seems to entirely refute and undermine precisely what I assume he has intended to describe, with much of the problematic material I’ll focus on in my response being the direct experience hypothesis, egoic constructs, and methods or practices. ...

Without 'spamming' the response section, as my response is quite long, this is a part of a response to the initial post. If anyone is interested, I'll post the full response in my blog section, which is a first for me...

the link: http://channelunreality.blogspot.com/

Interesting but...

I liked your article because it echoes some of my hunches. I have been irritated by the numerous articles posted on RealitySandwich where one person describes in detail their visions and experiences, after taking one drug or another, as something that is directly relevant to others. So in that aspect I thought your article to be a welcome break. Like you, I beliebe much of these experiences are projections of ego. With that said my first thought when reading your claims on liberation were: this article is not written by a person freed from ego. When I read Eckhart Tolle, the feeling is very different. It is not "provocative" as you yourself chose the term. So you have discovered one path, which is by using drugs. And then you conclude that they are THE way to experience that unity or ego-lessness. How surprising? Even if I read you between the lines, understanding that you mean that they are a way to get besides all the ego generated cruft, you still come off in the article as a person who believes in their own constructs. Anyway, as Goenka said, no need to throw away the entire pudding if you don't like the cardammom :) I think you ARE onto something. My personal conclusion would be that drugs can be useful, but give a temporary benefit. Much like drugs used in body building competitions. Permanent change, which you claim, I think does not require drugs or any external apparatus. It is a process which takes time and that's where maybe some of the spiritual traditions stand. I'm not convinced that you are freed from ego. I think you have experienced state of ego lessness, but got caught in the trap again ;) All the best, it is a long journey.

ego

Ball should stick to explaining his energy yoga work, which seems actually very interesting, instead of touting his personal views as absolute truth like some religious fanatic. He literally claims numerous times that he has "permenantly integreated controll of his ego" or operates without its influence ect ect ect ect. claiming that he is above all illusions. Time for mr. ball to wake up. There are so many inner contradictions in this article its sad- mostly because he seems intelligent and I, along with others, agree somewhat with much of it. He also, oddly, basically claims that there is only the physical dimension, and that all one sees on dmt "is a reflection or projection of 'ego'". This inclines me to beleive that he's never really experienced a full-on dmt breakthrough. Because the places you can encounter cannot simply be explained by the idea of 'ego-projection'. They are too alien, too meaningful, too intense, and too real. Like Peter Gorman said, if its not on his list of 10,000 imaginable scenarios, its probably a vision > being a hallucination. I really encounrage anyone who hasn't yet to read Ball's article on terence, and the Peter Meyer's rebuttal which i beleive is on RS. And, like a wise commenter mentioned here, we would all benefit (not just martin) greatly if we understood E-prime. Just pick up RAW's books. Quantum psychology talks about this in depth. love and peace to all. (even Ball :)

advice to mr ball

mr ball roll out your agenda, first attack Terence, then sit back, then come back, and act like you are correct, so you don't have to answer, to your rather over coded remarks about Terence, then persist in your agenda of finding young collage students that don't remember Terence, or never groked him, because they did not know what the word grok was.These young collage students will be impressed with your all so correct sounding way of explaining away, "machine elves" or fairies, or demons, or dancing bears, of birds that fly out of walls, or any of that hindo shmindo gods and goddesses, or shamanic, spirit helpers, or witches, familiars, and by golly all this new batch of collage age followers will be at your beck and call, because you make it so easy, and its all nice and neatly reduced to "ego" and "genuine" and "energetic" oh yes its the new yoga, it's Mr Ball yoga because he is the only one that can do it.Come on all you collage kids this is better then that old messy Meckenna stuff.

I feel I am more than that =)

Dear Jeff,

interesting perspective - I guess if Mr Ball or someone else is experiencing us as if, like you describe it:

"I, we, are all nothing but slightly demoniac ego-projections of Mr. Ball hisself, crowded around the castle tower with our pitchforks and torches, howling for the Master to hear our pleas and validate our existence"

then, on one level, we are all just that. At the same time, I feel, we are more than that =)

There are a lot of projections, dimensions, thoughts, love, feelings, life, etc going on...

With love

/Susan

you are unique - all you do is ground-breaking florries.wordpress.com - on life and living