Elephants: Please Don't Go

A week ago I was invited to join in a worldwide meditation on behalf of the elephants in Africa, which are under renewed threat of extinction. Ordinarily I am resistant to vigils, meditations, and "sending light," because it feels like a cop-out, a substitute for doing something. There is something obviously wrong with the attitude, "I won't do anything to help you, but I will hold you in the light." And if I am unwilling or unable to do something, I think it is better to face that truth than to imagine I have acted by merely sitting there.
Yet I also understand the despair so many people feel as we survey the depredations of the planet-wrecking machine, and our seeming helplessness to stop it. Meditating on behalf of the elephants can be a salve for that despair - but does it actually help the elephants, or only help us feel better? Despite my resistance, I think it can actually help the elephants: not as a substitute for action, but as a declaration to the universe of a willingness to act. A meditation can say, "I want to do something but I don't know what. Give me a way."
By sitting in a meditation for the elephants, or by holding a person in the light, I am readying myself to act. Often, an opportunity arises soon after that I might not have anticipated or imagined. I hold someone in the light, and soon he, or someone else in a similar situation, offers himself to me for assistance of some kind. The universe says, "Okay, we hear you, here is a chance to act on your good will." If I act, then I know my meditation was sincere. If I decline this invitation, I know I was lying to myself. This is a deeper reason why I hesitate to join meditations-for-the-cause. My plate is full already, and I don't want to offer myself to causes I don't have time for.
On this occasion I said yes. Sure enough, the surprising message I received from the elephants is compelling me to act, at least to the extent that writing and speaking constitutes action. I would like to share with you what the Elephant Oversoul told me - not that I especially believe in oversouls as an ontological category. Nor do I disbelieve in them. It is a convenient label to help describe my experience, which began with a strong feeling of the presence of Elephant, and an almost-verbal communication from that presence.
First, a few words on what, before my experience, I would have called the "plight" of the elephants. While poaching for meat and ivory remain big problems, the worst threat to the elephants today is habitat destruction. Not only has development cut off their ancient migration routes, herding then into increasingly confined places, but increased contact with human settlements and agricultural operations causes friction and danger, leading to pressure to "cull" the herds. When their natural habitats, freedom to roam, and social structure are destroyed, elephants turn "rogue," leading even their sympathizers to feel that they have no choice but to kill them. Recent initiatives to turn vast tracts of African land to palm oil plantations and other commodity crops threaten to exacerbate these pressures. Elephants and their habitat are rapidly being converted into money; some researchers fear they could be extinct from the wild in as little as five years.
Why did I put "plight" in quotation marks? A plight is a situation in which one is helpless to do anything but plead, to beg for help or mercy, and one might indeed say that the elephants are helpless victims of humanity's cruelty and greed. But this conception is contrary to the communication I received that day at noon on a high mountaintop outside of Santa Fe, New Mexico. After a few minutes of random thoughts, I felt the presence of the Elephant, a vast and incredibly ancient being. I asked, "What do you want?" The Elephant said, "We want you to ask us to stay." There followed an upwelling of words and images to the following effect:
Don't imagine that we are helpless to save ourselves. We can manipulate reality in ways you cannot begin to imagine. We are leaving because the way you treat us says that you don't want us. If our gifts are not welcome to you, we will bow out.
I think most people would feel the same way, the way we feel if we're working at a job where our contributions are not appreciated and we are not respected. Perhaps some species do not care if we honor their gifts - rats, maybe, termites, cockroaches - but elephants like whales and lions are beings of great dignity, and will not stay on earth if we continue to disrespect them.
All of this seems perversely anthropocentric - why should human honoring of the elephants' gift matter more than any other species' blessing - for indeed, the elephant is a keystone species in many African ecosystems? It is not only human beings who will suffer from their loss, so why should our attitude be more important than the warthogs'? I cannot answer this with complete certainty, but I think that there are two reasons why it is we humans from whom the elephants need to hear a plea to stay.
First, human beings are on the verge of entering our species' adulthood, in which we are to become earth's steward, earth's partner, earth's lover. Our coming-of-age ordeal is upon us, comprising the multiple crises of our time, a subject I explore more deeply elsewhere. Anthropocentric or not, we have taken on a role unique among all earth's species. No other species has the power to destroy or transform landscapes and ecosystems as we do. While it would be an exaggeration to say we might extinguish all life on earth, we have already eliminated a vast number of species, and if habitat destruction, ocean acidification, desertification, and other trends proceed apace, we will surely eliminate many more. With small exaggeration, we might say that the fate of the planet is in our hands. It is fitting, then, that the plea to stay should come from us. I say plea, because indeed it is to humanity that the word "plight" applies. Seeking to become nature's lords and masters, we have instead so severed our connection with the source of life that it is we who need nature's mercy.
Second, the elephants have a unique gift to offer humanity. I can only speculate on what this may be, but I think they are somehow holders of memory. Similarly to whales and dolphins, they use low-frequency rumblings and stompings to transmit signals hundreds of miles through the earth, enabling them to maintain a communication network, perhaps even a collective mind, with other members of their species. I cannot explain this rationally, but when I heard that they may go extinct, a certainty welled up within me: If the elephants go extinct, there will be nuclear war. It is as if, through some shamanic magic, they are preventing us from forgetting history (or forgetting ourselves) and unleashing holocaust. A few elephants in zoos and game reserves won't be enough - we need the elephant mind, the society of the elephant walking this earth. Could it be that the Elephant is the embodiment of some vast and merciful cosmic intelligence that is preventing us from killing ourselves with our own cleverness before we reach maturity?
The healer Marie Levit offers a further perspective on the gift of the Elephant:
The main spiritual qualities of elephants is their greatness and "largeness." I believe that is what we are here to learn from them. They are here to remind us of our own greatness. This is why they have "great memory" - so they can remember of their sacred greatness and remind those who has forgotten.
When our greatness disappears, elephants disappear as well, as they feel that their main quality is not needed. Their conscious disappearance is an awakening call for others. It's amazing that they are so "large" that they choose to sacrifice themselves in order to remind others of their largeness as well.
In my perception, this is what Ganesha story is about. In that situation both Shiva and Shakti acted "small": Shiva wouldn't give her space (what kind of God would do that?) and Shakti, in response created a being who would protect her from her own man (what kind of Goddess would need protection?) That's when elephant decides to sacrifice itself and becomes Ganesha -- to remind gods of their greatness every time they look at his large head.
I believe that is exactly why elephants choose to disappear at this time of history. With the crisis of everything, people forget more and more of their greatness, go into protection mode, like Shakti, and act small like Shiva. I believe that the way to "save" elephants is to fully receive their gift they are here to share with us, and remember our own greatness. By embracing the "elephant consciousness" within ourselves and Creation, we will support this energy on every level, including its embodied expression, and the elephants will have no reason to disappear.
If these musings are unconvincing or perhaps repellent to the reader, I might be tempted to take the usual Discovery Channel approach, and appeal to pity instead. Such an appeal might say, "Well, perhaps the elephants really aren't so important in the grand scheme of things, not compared to the big environmental issues of the planet. But they are such majestic creatures, it would be a shame if they disappeared. And they are so intelligent, and what is happening to them is really awful." I won't make this kind of appeal though, because it doesn't speak forth the urgency I feel. The loss of the elephants wouldn't be a pity or a shame, it would be a catastrophe whose proportions transcend rational explanation.
The ideology of the separate self that we have lived under for centuries says that we can insulate ourselves from the effects of our actions on others. On the collective level, it says that we can do the same to nature, that we can always engineer our way out of every crisis. If the elephants disappear, well, that's too bad, but we'll manage. This ideology, however, is becoming obsolete, as physics, ecology, psychology, and spirituality affirm the interdependent nature of the self, the self of inter-beingness. Accordingly, what happens to the elephants is also happening to ourselves, and their loss would tear an irreparable hole in the human psyche.
You needn't take my word for it. Read the book Elephant Whisperer, or watch some of the videos on the Corelight page referenced below, and you will understand that these beings are indeed part of ourselves, and that their loss is our own. This connection, and not rational concerns about ecosystems, is the real motivation for our desire to save the elephants. The science and all the other arguments give the mind, which is steeped in the belief systems of Separation, permission to believe what the heart already knows.
How, then, do we ask the elephants to stay? Our request must be communicated on multiple levels, not just as a mental or verbal asking, however heartfelt. Indeed, the means of this asking comprise all the things that activists and conservationists are doing today, the practical work on the ground. The mental plea to stay is a beginning, an invitation for opportunities to act in material and social reality. If you would like to do that, here are some resources to get started:
Corelight: combines hands-on action with an attunement to the spiritual importance of the elephants.
Save the Elephants: based in Kenya. The worst slaughter is happening in central Africa.
Animal Rights Africa: Comprehensive information to put the issue in context
Wildlife Direct: Links to numerous conservation activists
If you read about the situation and feel powerless to do anything about it, then perhaps it is time to try what I did, to meditate on the circumstances of the elephants and, with your heart and mind, plead with them to stay. If you do so, I expect that soon you will have an opportunity to do something real for them, if perhaps only indirectly. Something will call to you.
The elephant extermination is part and parcel of a whole way of life, a way of thinking and being that encompasses the money system, science, religion, and more. We all have a part to play in creating a world in which elephants are no longer slaughtered and habitats no longer converted to commodity export crops. Each of us has something to receive from the elephants, and each of us has something to give to them as well, to create a world in which elephants are welcome. For one thing to change, everything must change; if one thing changes, everything will. What is your part? What can you do? You might feel paralyzed in the face of the enormity of the world's problems, powerless and despairing. That is the time to bow into service and ask the world, as I asked Elephant, What do you want?
I leave you with some words from the poet W.S. Merwin.
THE CHAIN TO HER LEG
If we forget Topsy
Topsy remembers
when we forget her mother
gunned down in the forest
and forget who killed her
and to whom they sold
the tusks the feet the good parts
and how they died and where
and what became of their children
and what happened to the forest
Topsy remembers
when we forget how
the wires were fastened on her
for the experiment
the first time
and how she smoldered and
shuddered there
with them all watching
but did not die
when we forget
the lit cigarette
the last laugh gave her
lit end first
as though it were a peanut
the joke for which she
killed him
we will not see home again
when we forget the circus
the tickets to see her die
in the name of progress
and Edison and the electric chair
the mushroom cloud will go up
over the desert
where the West was won
the Enola Gay will take off
after the chaplain's blessing
the smoke from the Black Mesa's
power plants will be
visible from the moon
the forests will be gone
the extinctions will accelerate
the polar bears will float
farther and farther away
and off the edge of the world
that Topsy remembers
Images by Exfordy/Brian Snelson, used courtesy of a Creative Commons license.
Tweet- 1-4-11
- Charles Eisenstein's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version









Comments
Beautiful!
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
Beautiful Symbols of a Higher Consciousness
These Gorgeous Giants are herbivores, and communicate via body language and telepathy.
They are beautiful symbols of a gentle and pure consciousness.
One of the first great (and legendary) African animal activists, since the 1960's, was Peter Hill Beard, who at his ranch in Kenya, photographed many of the African animals who are now becoming extinct.
He was an ardent defender of the elephant world, and the precious little that is left of Africa's wild open spaces.
Thank you Charles for a great article.
Thank you
sahel
Curious
Well, you had me at "I think it is better to face that truth than to imagine I have acted by merely sitting there."
I've been thinking about prayer for some time, and going back and forth between praying and not praying. It seems wrong to ask for help or things. I am already being helped and given everything I need. It also feels wrong to ask for other's paths to be changed. It feels like in asking that someone's struggles be lightened I'm possibly denying something that they need. I liked George Carlin's take on it, something like 'What's the good of having a divine plan if every schmuck with a $2 prayer book can come along and fuck with the plan?'
Things are happening as they are for a reason, there is an intelligence far greater than mine about the workings of the world, and who am I to ask that they be different? But there there is also evidence that praying for specific things brings them about, usually in the most beautiful way possible. In the end I decided that I really like Brezsny's form: "I declare and desire that my Aunt Ruth will find the key to supporting herself as an acupuncturist so she can quit her gig as a grocery clerk, and I pray that in doing this she will become a more potent force for beauty and truth and goodness, lifting up everyone whose life she touches", so when I pray I try to follow that general structure.
But this is still in a way a cop out, but it is also still doing something. In retrospect I certainly do now see a pattern of praying for a person or a group and soon after being presented with an opportunity to do something. Sometimes I have followed through, other times not. And, perhaps more importantly, some of the times that I followed through it turned out that I ended up meddling and mucking things up, and when I tried to help it usually turned out that I didn't really have anything to give. I prayed for vets and ended up housing a homeless vet for a little over a month, and in the end I don't think I really helped, and he robbed us when he left. So if I did anything I gave him more reason to think he's bad or worthless or whatever. Perhaps that was the cosmos telling me: "Ok, you asked for it, and if you think you can help this way, here's your shot, but this might not be the best way." I don't know. I'm still trying to figure out how to give of my gifts in the right spirit. It should also be noted that, as in the case with the homeless vet, in learning what doesn't work I have gotten closer to finding something which will.
So right now I don't want to commit myself to the elephants, but I very much do want them to stay. I am aware of my deep need for free elephants to remain on the planet, even if I never get to meet one. We have some cousins of theirs here in Florida, the manatee (yes, interestingly, the elephant is the closest living relative to the manatee), and I often go out to a local spring where they gather in the winter for warmth and play the didgeridoo for them. Folks' first reaction is usually to think I'm communicating with them. Maybe I am, I don't know, I prefer to think I'm just sharing one of my gifts with them. They have given my wife and I a few beautiful gifts of their presence at special moments in nature, and we feel connected to them and grateful for their existence.
I don't know what I can do for elephants, so I don't want to commit. I will, however, do everything I can to avoid using palm oil from now on. I had already been avoiding it since learning that the rainforests of Indonesia are also being clear cut to grow palms, and the Orangutans are being massacred in the process. Sodium Laurel Sulfate, often abbreviated SLS, is a derivative of palm oil, it's a sudsing agent used in soaps, shampoos, and toothpaste other than a few of the smaller natural brands. So something small to do would be to check for that when buying toothpaste, soaps, and shampoos, and checking foods for palm or palm kernel oil. The less we consume the less palm plantations are needed, hopefully the less free land is converted into farm. The funny thing though, we just started making our own soap and the vegetable shortening was made from palm oil. I'll have to find a different recipe. I had some misgivings about it and for whatever reason didn't listen to them. Next time I will.
In facing the truth that I don't want to do anything to help them, it turned out that I have to do something to help them. I don't know what yet, but something is telling me I can't ignore this. Thank you for your insights into prayer, elephants, and our forgotten connections. If nothing else, this hasled me to the insight that it is better to pray for things and people closer to me, things and people for whom I have the power to really do something helpful.
Prayer
I heard long ago, and in recent years have come to a deep understanding of it:
The only prayer is one of gratitude.
We an be grateful for the presence of elephants on this planet, for the gift of awareness of their beauty and gentle nature. We can give thanks for the space they have to live in and for the protections they are given by our love and gratitude. We can imagine that circle of protection around them, and be grateful that we are aware enough to know that imagining it DOES truly create it!
Thanks for the information on Palm oil. I have seen proof that prayer DOES work - (no matter what you call it), but supporting what I believe through my behavior is prayer in action.
Thank you Charles for a beautiful article. I've felt a strong connection and compassion for elephants, and believe they are special and deeply emotional.
thoughts on prayers of gratitude
I don’t agree with that. I’ve heard it as well, and even tried it for a time, but it didn’t work for me. The simple truth is that I don’t always feel grateful. When I do feel grateful I am sure to give thanks, but when I tried to give thanks in moments when I didn’t feel grateful and still wanted my existence to be more fulfilling than what I my reality was, but gave thanks for the things I did have “because that’s the only way to pray”, I ended up feeling like I was lying. I wasn’t grateful, and giving thanks didn’t give me gratitude, and it actually made me feel worse most of the time. “What’s wrong with me for not feeling gratitude for all that I have?” In the end I decided that it was better to be honest. That’s why, I think, saying grace before meals almost always sounds forced and fake. It is. I often bow my head and give thanks after I’ve had a few bites, especially when the food is a gift or is just phenomenally beautiful. I find that I’m usually exponentially more grateful after I’ve had a few bites! And when I’m overwhelmed with gratitude, I love giving thanks.
Another reason I don’t agree with it is that it doesn’t take account of our creative power. We’re allowed to want things to be different, we’re allowed to want things to be more beautiful. It’s good to be grateful, it’s good to express gratitude to Creation, but there’s more to prayer than that. I don’t have all the answers yet, and I am figuring most of this out by trial and error, but this is what it feels like to me. I pray for beauty. I pray for love. I pray for trust—in the cosmos and in myself. I pray that the people I know who’s lives are perhaps lacking those things become filled with them. I pray for healing and wholeness, with an understanding that while the world is whole in one sense and healing is happening, there is also in another sense, a deep lack which I want to see filled, and am willing to help fill. And I pray that the elephants don’t leave. I feel a deep resonance with them, even deeper now that Charles has put their feelings to words, feelings that I have felt most of my life. Why do I bother staying here if I’m unappreciated, constantly harassed, and can’t give of my gifts? I’ve “gone rogue” myself a number of times for the same reasons, as have friends of mine. I even have a friend who was “put down” for going rogue, killed by police because he didn’t fit in the ever smaller spaces given for beautiful and creative humans to try to exist in and between. I pray for healing to come soon, I pray that this world doesn’t end in nuclear holocaust, or in a runaway greenhouse effect turning our beautiful Earth into another 800 degree Venus. We can pray for these things, which stem not from gratitude but something we lack.
And in doing so, as Charles said, we are driven to and given an opportunity to do something about them. This was the link that I had missed. Prayer for things does work, but part of the way it works is by bringing an opportunity for us to display our creative power and DO SOMETHING about the thing which drew our prayer. We are assured to have divine help, the prayer works, but we are co-creators, and thus we are given a space to act as well. Praying simply in gratitude seems to miss this. Same as Buddhist meditations on accepting reality “as it is”, and letting go of the desires that things be different. Yes, finding gratitude or accepting reality as it is brings peace, but we are human, we are Creators too, and we want to live in a more beautiful world. Praying for things is OK. I suppose I could pray for a new car or something too, but that’s not where my mind is. The things I long for are much, much bigger!
prayers
Thank you both for some deep thinking. These issues and the pardoxes underneath them won't go away easily. How to account, on the one hand, for the well-documented efficacy of prayer (without any accompanying action) to apparently alter reality, and on the other hand the obvious wrongness of using prayer as a form of spiritual bypass, a substitute for actually doing something? This is related to the other issue that came up: prayers of supplication vs. prayers of gratitude. I asked this of a Christian friend once who was praying to Jesus to help his friend find a new job quickly after he'd been laid off. I said, "How do you know that unemployment isn't the best thing for him right now? Maybe God is arranging things so that he can realize what's truly important in life. Who are you to second-guess God's plan?"As Harlan discovered as well, be careful what you ask for. OK, so what then is the purpose and the power of prayer?
In the article I basically said that prayer prepares us for action and invites opportunties to take that action. On a deeper level though, what it does is to align us with a way of being, an experience of self and world. A prayer of gratitude aligns you with the way things are. (By the way, please don't say fake prayers of gratitude. Only say them when you are actually grateful.) A prayer of supplication, or perhaps more properly a prayer of declaration as quoted by Harlan, aligns you with what is yet to be. If this alignment is not blocked by hidden wounds, shadows, ego agendas, etc., then it can manifest easily, without action. Thus it is that the prayers of great saints and mystics have such power. But if there is a hidden wound or conflict or disintegrity, then work must be done before it can manifest in your experience of the world. Action, in relationship to other beings, is a vehicle to accomplish this work-on-self. Usually it is the only vehicle. (See my other comment below for more on this.)
I hope that explanation wasn't too abstract. If there is a lot of demand for it maybe i could expand upon it in another essay.
Charles
the paradox of "be careful what you wish for"
On the one hand, housing the homeless vet didn't do what I wanted it to do. On the other hand, it presented me with an enormous opportunity for learning and growth, as you said. It brought forth deeper wounds for healing, and showed me the importance of giving in the right spirit, and of ensuring that I have something to give before I offer something. The old give a man a fish story. At the time I didn't have anything to give but individual fish, so he left unsatisfied. There were certianly "hidden wounds, shadows, ego agendas, etc.," involved at the time as well, many of which were brought to the surface in the course of events during his stay, as you said in the comment below to Leon.
Thank you for these insights. I for one would be incredibly grateful to read an essay of your current thoughts on this topic.
prayers
Thank you Harlan and Charles for your insights. I love the deep thought in your responses.It reinforces the idea that prayer, like reality, is subjective. For me, moving into gratitude is really easy, even when I'm upset. I begin to think of things I am grateful for so that I move into that feeling before declaring my prayer. And my Religious Science training comes back, and I normally align myself with What Is before actually stating my gratitude.
I've been reading Byron Katie's work, and it reminds me that I CANNOT KNOW what is "best" (As you were saying, Charles). When I remember that all that Is, is exactly as it should be and it couldn't really BE any other way, I can't help but be grateful. Any thoughts about what is not being the way I want it to be is just a thought, and the more closely I attach to my thoughts, the more I suffer.
Perhaps I didn't explain that well. Ram Dass also talks of loving what is. Gratitude is just the tool that helps me move into that part of myself that doesn't identify with my thoughts of what "should" be. But, that's just me.
I'm grateful and I love that you have your own way of praying, Harlan. I honor your love, however you give it. It all works!
Peace to you both, and thank you again for the conversation. And thanks, Charles, for the article.
honoring the "upsetness"
On gratitude
What has been proven is the beneficial effeect of feeling gratitude on people who do feel gratitude.
The trick is not to feel gratitude for everything ( there is plenty in this world not to feel grateful for).
Make it specific- concentrate on something that someone else has done for you in the course of the day and spend some time dwelling on it and observing closely the physical sensations generated. Especially direct your attention to the physical sensation in the heart chakra area.
This has a profoundly normalising stabilising effect on ones own psychology- and this inevitably produces positive changes in one's day to day interactions. Those positive interactions go on to make a difference in the day of the people you interact with and a ripple effect is created.
I don't know about deeper, paranormal type effects of gratitude prayer meditation ( I hope they are there, but do not know of my own experience) but I do know that this is true.
The psychiatrist Daniel Amen has produced functional brain scans of people after doing this kind of exercise and the normalising effect on the brain function of otherwise disturbed people is easily demonstrable.
Push or Pull
I’m a bit surprised by this article. It seems to me that Animal Rights, as an indicator of progress in the evolution of human consciousness, has its place. But I see it as the cart, while the horses of Human Rights should logically be coupled to it, but up in front of the cart where they belong. Advancing the progress of human evolution will automatically pull the cart of animal rights along with it. Pushing the horses by getting behind the cart, mostly because animals are innocent victims, just seems illogical to me. How about Plant Rights? They've been here even longer than animals have!
Sure… when the horses are annoyed by being bumped from behind, they’ll move, but in no specific beneficial direction, right? It’s similar, I think, to how the American public pushes the American political process… annoyingly, and in no specific beneficial direction. (But that’s a different story)
I suppose, since there seems no way to deliberately advance the progress of human consciousness to the point where animal rights will be a “given”, those involved in praying for Elephants believe it’s better than doing nothing. I dunno… I think it’s a waste of time. If I were to pray for something, it would seem more logical to pray for the driver of the horses (the human) for the wisdom to know the direction indicated by deep historical precedence, who would then pull the cart where it needs to go.
The deep history of progress in the development of—in the evolution of—human consciousness is now common knowledge. This history can now be extrapolated so that the progress of our future development can be known. I don’t know why we can’t just take these reigns and guide the present where we already know it will eventually go. Unfortunately, those with the courage and the power won’t exercise the available wisdom, and because of their stupidity humanity may instead be pushed over the cliff. An eventuality potentially better for Elephants, don't you think?
A lot is said lately of being “on the side of history”. In other words, are Elephants going to be here ten thousand years from now? If they are, go ahead and pray for them. If not, you’re wasting your time. It’s the same, I suppose, with humans. But since humans are currently at the top of the food chain, and appear to be in control of the direction, not only of their own survival but the survival of other life forms, I think praying for humans to grow in wisdom and to have the courage to exercise that wisdom, makes more sense.
Imagine if humans would have organized and prayed for the survival of the dinosaurs? What a fucking waste of time that would have been, huh?
Human consciousness vs. animal welfare
While it is true that the evolution of human consciousness will ultimately benefit the welfare of animals, plants, and ecosystems, that doesn't mean we should put these things aside temporarily while we work on ourselves. In fact, there IS no other way to work on ourselves except through our relationships to other beings. Other beings, including other people, bring up latent issues for us to work on, and give us a chance through relating to them to establish who we are. This should not be surprising, from the vantage point of the connected self. Other beings mirror parts of ourselves. What may be hidden to introspection is revealed through relationship.
So yes, there is no hope for animals, plants, or indeed the planet if we don't change our consciousness. However, there is also no hope to change our consciouisness, if not through the agency of animals, plants, and the planet.
Charles
Compartmentalizing Compassion
The difficulty that most religious interpretations get into is in this compartmentalization of compassion. Leon's suggestion that we need to put the horse (of saving humans) before the cart (of saving elephants ) is one manifestation of this compartmentalization, i.e., separation.
True compassion cannot be compartmentalized. It is all-encompassing. For, it is impossible to be indifferent to the suffering of elephants without losing our capacity for compassion towards our fellow humans. This is what Einstein was talking about when he said that "our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."
Karmic Ripple
After reading your article, I find myself more devoted to integrating elephant's spirit of greatness and staying out of small-minded thoughts and actions in my life experience.
"Everything is blooming most recklessly; if it were voices instead of colors, there would be an unbelievable shrieking into the heart of the night." - Rainer Maria Rilke
Elephants
stampede
In psyche-speak, the elephant can represent memory and history. History is a magical and large being that has been overlooked. We are the only creatures to have a history. We cannot dishonor it without dishonoring the elephants.
I have an article on RS about elephants and the coming age: http://www.realitysandwich.com/stampede_sweetness
namaste
what becomes and what does not
is not the Child of a thought
elegant
"Save The Humans"
Dare I suggest that if all of the time and effort and money wasted to “save the animals” were spent instead to “save the humans” we might all be further along the road to survival?
That if all of these resources devoted to species we have presumptuously assigned ourselves responsibility for were instead devoted to the immediate and growing need of our own species survival, would not only our own continuity be more assured, but, as a direct result, so also would theirs?
If the millions and millions of “man-hours”, and millions and millions of dollars, and millions of gallons of tears were all sacrificed freely for this effort instead of “animal rights”, don’t you think we would all be closer to establishing an ideal environment for every living thing on this planet?
Those who still think that my logic is flawed need to re-read Paul Levy’s article below and wake the fuck up!
Presumptuous?
It would indeed be presumptuous to try to save other species if it were not in fact our own actions that were driving them to extinction. If you are, say, beating up a kid on the playground, would it be presumptuous to stop and save him from yourself? I think not.
As for focusing on ourselves, the mindsets and ideologies that allow us to destroy other living beings and systems are the same that allow us to hurt other humans. While on a superficial level it might appear that saving the elephants is fatuous diversion from the more important task of, say, saving the children in Haiti, the plight of the children in Haiti is itself a symtomm of a much deeper malady. We can scramble around sending money to ameliorate one crisis after another, as humanitarian institutions have been doing for a long time, but if we don't also address the foundations of our way of life, nothing will ever change.
Finally, the elephants or whales don't exist separately from the rest of the ecosystem on which we depend. When keystone species disappear, the entire ecosystem becomes more fragile. This is a matter of grave importance for humanity, because we depend on that ecosystem too.
But I think your comment might be drawing from a deeper source. There is a traditional of technologist thinking that says we don't really need the ecosystem, or that we one day will not need it; that humanity's destiny is to ascend beyond nature. If that is true, then to worry too much about nature is a kind of indulgence -- we should put our efforts on the advancement of technology, the development of technological solutions to our problems. So, for example, if the bees are dying, instead of trying to save the bees, we should be investigating alternatives to bees, such as artificial pollination and hydroponics. Personally, I think this "story of ascent" is mistaken, and rapdily becoming obsolete. We no longer believe in a Jetsons-like future. But I could be wrong!
Charles
Or,
But those cultural sicknesses Levy talks about (at least in the first paragraph, which I admit was as far as I cared to go) kind of make a lot of humans unlovable. A friend of mine told me a story when we were in Iraq. He said "You know, I saw a lot of dead Iraqis and it didn't phase me, but we were in this one firefight and I saw a dog that had been shot and I cried like a girl. I don't particularly like humans, but it's fucked up that an innocent dog got killed."
What if your calling is to "save the humans", and other people are allowed to work in ways which prevent the extinction of the elephants? Perhaps you and I can stay here helping humans while others who are more inclined focus on conservation of the rest of the world, which we are in the process of converting into cash and status symbols as a result of the cultural sickness we've been infected with.There absolutely is plenty of work with humans. The trouble is, most of them aren't at a point where they want to be saved. And you can't force salvation.
Besides, what do you propose be done with "all the time and money" that we will save by no longer funding conservation efforts? You can't buy a whole new way of being a human, perhaps we should just buy all the impoverished and starving of the world TV's and TV dinners so that they have a distraction from the purposelessness our way of life has imposed upon them? As Alan Watts put it,
"The startling truth is that our best efforts for civil rights, international peace, population control, conservation of natural resources, and assistance to the starving of the earth--urgent as they are--will destroy rather than help if made in the present spirit. For, as things stand, we have nothing to give. If our own riches and our own way of life are not enjoyed here, they will not be enjoyed anywhere else. Certainly they will supply the immediate jolt of energy and hope that methedrine and similar drugs give in extreme fatigue. But peace can be made only by those who are peaceful, and love can be shown only by those who love. No work of love will flourish out of guilt, fear, or hollowness of heart, just as no valid plans for the future can be made by those who have no capacity for living now. The separate person is without content, in both senses of the word."
So not to fault your logic, but I can't for the life of me fathom a way that more time and money--given by whom? governments? aren't the people with all the money the very people whose 'lack of consciousness' is most responsible for the extreme degradations of the earth and human population?-- will help save our species. It seems to me that nothing but the collapse of the systems of money and work as they currently exist will allow the revolution in beingness that will keep us from destroying ourselves and the planet.
What is over there, is over here
That if all of these resources devoted to species we have presumptuously assigned ourselves responsibility for were instead devoted to the immediate and growing need of our own species survival, would not only our own continuity be more assured, but, as a direct result, so also would theirs
I do not see the difference. Devotion to "THEM" is devotion to "US." We are all inextricably connected. That's not just new age talk, it's scientific fact. Break the bonds of separation!
Evolving Consciousness
“Evolving consciousness, bite by bite” Isn’t this the theme of Reality Sandwich?
The evolution of human consciousness—its direction and its pace—is the single, most consequential, most fundamental issue on our planet today. All other considerations—all other efforts to define our crisis differently—are at best just feeble attempts to nibble around its edges; nothing more than “beating around the bush” …and at worst, seriously flawed distractions that absorb or deflect essential energies that, if utilized more appropriately, might help assure our survival.
The Ascent played a major role in my own evolution by addressing one of the key elements of my own sleeping awareness; that of connection vs. separation and the notion that because we are spiritually separated from each other, our planet, and its other life forms—because we are at the apex of our “me-first” mentality—we are turning our living planet into dead money. One of the other major lessons, which is hidden in the book’s title, is that we humans consider this planet-raping insanity to be a consequence of the advancement of the human race. The author of this wonderful book taught me to interpret this so-called rise of civilization as an indictment of consensus consciousness, and an indication of the fall of humanity. As a play on words, the title speaks of the consensus opinion of our Ascent, but the book tells of our precipitous Descent.
Never again will I be able to beat around the bush; to nibble around the edges, as I trace the cause, and attempt to predict the outcome of our momentous crisis.
“Save Darfur” – “Save the Whales” – “Save the Rain Forest” - “Save the Planet” – These are all attempts to nibble around the edges of the essence of our dilemma. What needs to be communicated is the history and the progress of the evolution of human consciousness, the process of which is continuing. The future possibilities of this process begs our awareness of it. What really needs to be “saved” is the potential future paradise on Earth, which humans—given their wisdom and their power—are able to create on this planet for all of its life forms. What needs to be encouraged is the further development of the human race to its full adulthood. It is that potential which must be saved!
Ours is a crisis of awareness. Humanity, in its current stage of adolescence—seemingly locked in this self-reactive stage of awareness—is clueless about the bigger picture. It can’t imagine the potential future that might await it. It is locked in the myopic view of its own pubescence and can’t even conceive of the hope hidden in its loins.A new self-reflective stage of awareness is now just beginning to take hold, but much of its effect has been narcissistic. We gaze at our selves in the mirror, under the influence of our favorite psychedelic, with new wonder. We gaze across the landscape of a living planet with new respect. We fall into a trance of awe at both the symmetry and the chaos of the universe. But we continue to be blind to the evolutionary process that is driving us into the future; that is begging us to get our face out of the fucking mirror and see things as they really are!
Ours is a crisis of awareness—we are as yet unable to appreciate the potential of where we are going. Instead of creating a new future we continue to nibble around the edges of this one.
Where are the true Cultural Creatives? W H E R E A R E Y O U?
nibbling around the edges
I absolutely hear what you are saying -- maybe I didn't quite catch your meainging before. The save-the-whales, save-the-children and the campaign to end muscular dystrophy can indeed be distractions from the deeper issues. They imply that things are basically OK, except for a few problems that need to be taken care of on our way up.
On the other hand, I have witnessed people go through a kind of deepening process, a radicalization process. They get involved in some issue like this, and then discover that it isn't just one small insitution that is rotten, it isn't just an isolated problem, but that it exists in a larger context. For example, I see this a lot in the holistic health movement . People start out thinking society is basically OK, except this one piece that we've got wrong. But soon they discover that the government and big science are complicit in the unhealthy food system.... all of our institutions are. And so they begin to dig deeper, ultimately to learn that human consciousness itself is at the root. So basically, any issue can be a gateway to the deeper transformation. Yes, we start nibbling around the edges, but soon we want to take a bigger bite.
Converse, Plan, Execute, Iterate
Charles Thank you for your article as well as the communities comments. Over the past couple years starting a venture and Working intensely with many start up non profit companies, I see that there is a common thread with many of the Causes I see.Lack of execution and a marketing problem. I guarantee you the average american does not know the elephants are dying out. Creating awareness costs considerable amount of money. Even using Social Media campaigns to make something like this go viral doesn't work because every other day you are hit with the next water running youtube video or Amazonian land sloth sighting.
It's lack of attention to so much else going on that dissuades from action, so it's easier to just give money.
From experience working with a semi-failed non-profit startup, the main issue was that they could not drill down their high minded very eloquent cause into a 30 second pitch. If the Concept is too complex, the general public won't move it forward. If when explaining your cause, you can't pull on their heart strings, they will not open their purse strings.The Reasons why non-profits need money and not just volunteers, is that most of the problems they are trying to solve require highly specialized people to execute the objective. Creating and understanding the Clear Objectives and metrics to see if objectives were met, Reverse engineering how the pieces should line up, Putting it into a Project plan, defining what skills are needed, Putting together timelines and executing the plan.
What is the Plan? What is the Vision on the how the elephants can be saved? is it realistic to ask starving people thousands of miles away to not eat this meat? Does this mean we subsidize a continent's food supply if we want to save the elephants. Very tough questions that need consideration.
I have found even in small groups that if a group of people can see a solution in communal way in the mind's eye then that reality can come to pass if acted upon, but it has to been perceived in the groups conscientiousness before it's actualized.
The really beautiful thing i have found in doing many projects is that by the time the team as a whole has understood and solved everyproblem the project completion is actualized and finished. Meaning that once every problem and action to be done in process completely understood by the team, the solution and process is complete.Each one of these causes needs a Open source Execution Plan that people can volunteer to fulfill their part. Those that really care about these unfortunate situations can offer their expertise and see what Project roles are available and help execute.
The behavior of survival, inhibits connecting to the repository of subconscious truth.
the plan
I certainly don't have a plan to save the elephants! But yes, I think it is essential to do the work you describe in material and social reality, and not just send light or pray. Sometimes, sending money can be an effective form of concrete action, for reasons you describe.
I'm not sure if I understood you right, but I found especially intriguing that once all the planning and logistics and understanding is complete, once every problem and action is figured out, the problem kind of solves itself. It is as if the entire planning process is a kind of magic ritual. Sending money is a ritual act as well -- it attempts to alter physical reality by the manipulation of symbols. Fascinating.
Charles
Link to Save the Elephants in Kenya
I love elephants
Thank you Charles