Support our Kickstarter

Economics Built on Beauty and Community

greenbig.jpg

 

This article was originally published on www.triplepundit.com under my column "Field Notes on Sustainable Wealth - Seeking New Definitions"

Right before I boarded a plane recently, I noticed a Body Shop in the terminal next to the gate. The Body Shop has been a leading business that incorporates social and environmental values into its operations. It was founded by the late Anita Roddick, one of the emergent leaders in the expanding and evolving “green” business movement.

Roddick was a very influential and inspiring thought leader, she stood as a pillar of the socially and environmentally responsible business movement. As I thumbed through my reading materials I found an article in Resurgence Magazine by Roddick entitled “The Currency of Imagination.” This eloquent article laid out some of her guiding principles and reflections on being one of the only CEOs (if not the only CEO) in the crowd of human beings who raised their voices against the globalization paradigm represented by the 1999 WTO meeting in Seattle.

In the article she laid out a new vision for society, a vision which I share, where we place community and beauty as driving values for our individual and institutional decision making. I have learned that for any successful endeavor in new economic thinking to work, it must be built on a culture of trust and collaboration amongst the participants. Such ideas have inspired me in the efforts I have made in my region in co-founding Green Business Networking, a monthly networking event which brings together entrepreneurs and professionals who are committed to greening our economy through their businesses.

Somewhere along the line we picked up a virus in our culture’s source code. This virus misguided us by placing money and power as the central measuring sticks for success, all fed by a rapacious economic operating system driven by the gospel of consumerism. Our economy has become devoid of beauty and community, transactions have become ”complex, opaque, anonymous based on short term outcomes” according to Don Shaffer, President of RSF Social Finance, and our transactions need to become “direct, transparent and personal based on long term relationships.” On a similar theme, Judy Wicks, founder of the White Dog Café, who is also a co-founder of the very successful movement “Business Alliance For Local Living Economies” lives these principals. She says that her business was built on the principal of “maximizing relationships” rather than “maximizing profits.” As a result of her focus, her business thrived with the satisfaction of higher sales, and happier people.

In the wake of the recent financial crisis, and the significant ills facing our world, it has become clear to many people that the prevailing economic paradigm is no longer working to improve the well being of humanity. With climate crisis, declining ecosystems, billions, food riots, childhood diabetes, etc. individuals and institutions are experiencing the severe ramifications of an avaricious and predatory economic model. However, there is another way.

I spend a fair amount of energy inquiring into the nature of the latent economic opportunity of which Roddick spoke -- that which incorporates beauty and community into the economic equation. I am also keen on discerning the most effective and coherent actions necessary to transmute our current economy of waste into an economy of thriving abundance, conservation and renewal for 100 percent of humanity. Our economic paradigm utilizes debt manipulation and consumerism as a short-sighted means to an unforeseen dead end and endless gluttony for few at the top of the heap.

Roddick said:
Consumerism doesn’t care if we buy in beautiful or ugly surroundings. Few aspects of the global economy provide beauty or community and, worse, in many ways it drives them out by deliberate manipulation of debt, which is as as powerful motivator as invented in human history. On the other hand, providing for these vital needs requires another kind of economy altogether, which emphasizes beauty, community and creativity.

Sadly, and with far reaching consequences, our current economy has failed to value such manifestations of “beauty, community and creativity. She pointed out that the economist John Maynard Keynes “talked about the hideous waste of economic system that could not recognize art or beauty…. In a speech to the Irish government in 1933, he urged politicians and economists to raise their ambition, and spend the money on beauty.”

Yet, the economy of beauty that we need transcends and includes the artful beauty of which he speaks. It is a culture of thriving community of people inspired by, evolving and learning from others and from and beauty that surrounds them.

How do we recognize and create such a vibrant community as the foundation of a successful economic paradigm?

Such a community has “deep connectivity” between participants. In a private paper, leading thinker Jon Ramer wrote that some of the citizens in a society of deep connectivity are “committed to produce something in their lives and the lives of others.” And, that such a society “is for building relationships, producing meaningful results, learning and growing together via a principled-approach to personal and community development.”

An economic system that encourages such “deep connectivity” is based on what I would call the currency of relationships. A perfect example of is the deeply successful Mondragon Cooperative movement, a community based economic system successfully operating the Basque region of Spain. It started during the Great Depression in the 1930s and thrived amid the oppressive Franco dictatorship. Mondragon succeeded in such a fascist context “by avoiding confrontation, not by being passively servile but by doing what was for the good of all.”

Author Thomas Greco made an important point that the success of Mondragon experience is replicable, but only in conjunction with the simultaneous weaving of a strong social fabric. That effort need not necessarily be centered around ethnic identity and culture, but could based on other common factors between the participants -- such as religious affiliation, geographical proximity, shared values, or other factors that create common interests (but with concern for the greater common good always foremost.)

It is precisely this inherent characteristic of wishing to be part of something greater than ourselves that has given humans a sense of meaning since time immemorial. This heroic sense of contribution and sharing for the common good is a key principle of success.

Consider: has there ever been a time in history when this kind of collective heroism is more important than now, when the stakes are as high as they can get?

Mondragon scholar, Terry Mollner makes a distinction between the declining ‘material age’ and the emerging ‘relationship age,’ and concludes that the [Mondragon founders] ‘set about building a Relationship Age society by extending into more sophisticated realms the Relationship Age values which were already present In Basque Society.’

Along the same lines, Roddick concludes “We will succeed to the extent to which we encourage human connection and conversation. We will succeed also to the extent to which we spend the small change of imagination – the human stories about people and places and what they aspire to do.

Although it has been said before – we are at a critical juncture where our global circumstances require each of us to embrace that responsibility in every relationship we have. We share the responsibility to manifest the “Relationship Age” right where we are. A Relationship Age where artful living in deep connectivity is the evolutionary catalyst to shift our current economic operating system into a creation of shared wellbeing for our lives here on spaceship Earth.

 

Image by Patrick Hoesly, courtesy of Creative commons license.

Comments

the Sense of Meaning

I like this article a lot -- one of the big discoveries for me of the last 6 months, year, is the extent to which the development of personal relationships is what makes a given effort work.

A concern?

"It is precisely this inherent characteristic of wishing to be part of something greater than ourselves that has given humans a sense of meaning since time immemorial. This heroic sense of contribution and sharing for the common good is a key principle of success."

I look at this very differently.

We do not "wish" to be part of something greater than ourselves, -- we already are.

Rather, we are compelled by knowledge of consequence to act in the right way, to do the right thing, to make a meaningful difference in that greater context.

We don't form groups just to self-pleasure ourselves and fill up a "meaning" meter (like in the Sims);  Rather, we do it because it's the necessary thing.

People feel meaningless today because they have no influence on the world around them.  We're all neatly organized into our little apartments and houses, "worlds unto ourselves," and entertained untill death.

The "sense of meaning" can be useful, to help us drive towards the meaningful acts.  But it's not the sense of meaning that is important;  But rather the meaningful act itself.

I think it's important to get this right, because I've seen people get lost in persuit of the "sense of meaning," without doing anything meaningful.  Our world says "you make your own meaning, so go make some meaning," but it's nothing like that -- it's not like making sand-castles and declaring yourself a king.  We have to search out and do what actually matter.

This said:  Forming personal relationships with others will be an essential part of that task, and the meanings that come forth have to emerge in their own time;  They cannot be dictated or predetermined, ...

Wishing to recognizing

I wholeheartedly agree - "recognition" or "awakening" to the greater context of our lives and relationships is a more effective choice of words. '

And again - yes agreed - having a "sense" of meaning alone would not be enought, that "sense" is only the entry point for meaningful living, acting etc. 

Thanks for your thoughts!

Like this.

And I've always kept an eye for - what will these speculated changes look like? A new wave of consciousness, a new society is coming - great - but what is it going to look like? What are people going to do differently that they're doing now? Or differently than 100 years ago? When we decouple from an empty consumerist society, the dollar, oil, corporatist America, etc, etc - what's going to look different? How are people going to spend their time? Will there be more leisure time, will there be more people hanging out in the street, will there be more people growing food, will there be more crime, how will people channel their energies into something productive (& avoid crime, alchoholism, etc) in an age of scarcer resources? It may not be as easy to say - hey I'm going to open a corner store selling Coca-cola & Fritos, or even to go work part-time at Target selling plastic from China. There may be less stuff to sell in a world with vastly more expensive oil. There may be fewer buyers in a less consumeristic world. Will there be more music, will there be more meditation, will there be more time spent in manual labor, will the monetary system operate similarly, how will we pay rent, will we have to pay rent? I know a lot of these questions have been explored on this site (a Pinchbeck article here, a reference to the Venus Project there)... and I am not approaching them systematically in this comment... just saying that there's still quite a ways to go in filling out the picture, & this world of questions is always begged for me. Namaste all. - Melanie D.

have you heard of YES! magazine?

Great article! Thanks for sharing. People should check out Yes! magazine. There's also lots of great resources and articles about creating a new economy that works for everyone http://www.yesmagazine.org/ I would also highly suggest the works of David Korten and Van Jones. "To live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory." ~ Howard Zinn

Content Filtering

Good article! Thanks for sharing. People should check out Yes! magazine. There's also lots of great resources and articles about creating a new economy that works for everyone content filtering

yesterday and today

It's very sad Anita Roddick became ill and left us so prematurely. She was a pioneer, who built a beauty empire at a time when trying to incorporate such ethical standards was not easy. The stress was tremendous.

She walked a fine line between the realities of the established corporate world and the constant needs and desires of an increasingly demanding green community.

She sold her business at a time when many felt she should have hung on to it, refine it, but it didn't seem financially feasible for her. She let go of the company so it could grow, use the profits for other ventures. Sadly along with it went by the wayside many of the principles her company was founded on.

She had an aversion to allowing models to represent her lines as most cosmetics and beauty products companies do. Although that might have been admirable, there's a reason why models play such a great role in this business. They become the ambassadors of a brand, without them, the brand really never develops a human face, other than a logo.

That may have been at a time when green models did not exist, so rather than entrust the image of her company to girls who could not understand her objectives, she kept Body Shop rather generic, and I feel in the end this hurt the company, because the green makeup revolution today, has left Body Shop behind. Without Roddick's guidance, the ingredients used in the formulation do not meet the criteria of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. Body Shop is being accused of green washing, something I think Anita would have fought against would she be around today.

She got the ball rolling, paved the way for Aveda, many others. Yet, now, with amazing progress in green chemistry, and the green makeup artist revolution taking place in Los Angeles at the heart of the film community, intelligent, educated women (and men) are taking extreme care about what they put on their skin, either as professionals or as consumers.

Anita was a great speaker, a great motivator, but the realities of applying herself to growing her own business in the direction she envisioned proved furtive. There's still hope for Body Shop, but it would take a very progressive and enlightened executive to restore a green aura around the brand. They've cut too many corners.

Remy C.
GreenMUA.com

Thanks for all your comments - and some responses

Thanks for your comments, and responses! Indeed, Yes! Magazine is a favorite, I have given to clients for some time. Also David Korten and Van Jones are big inspirations/friends. My blogs: www.sustainablewealth.blogspot.com wherein I post on everything from Complementary Currency, Evolving Investments and Economic Theory, Regenerative Economics, Quality of Life, Etc. www.wakeupdream.blogspot.com where I post on matters science, spirituality, philosophy, poetry, aesthetics, etc. Blessings Greg

India Property

Pretty cool post. Your focus on some economic activities are awesome and a great example for others. I will try as much as possible to improve on my skills from the advices in the article. Thanks a lot for the information. I really need this. India Property