Disclosure 2009

I like my RealitySandwich without these nutters. Come on, Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy are an insult to intelligence. They do have a lot of interesting (dis-)information, but they never question anything that their interviewees say. I used to check out their site regularly until I realized it was full of negativity. Over at "Project Camelotte" (a french pun), every person they interview happens to be a "wonderful human being, full of integrity and dignity, with great courage yadi, yada, rinse repeat". How objective is that? These two persons travel all around the world on the money of gullible peopple. What a cool job. Man I wish I could just quit mine and travel all accross the globe, give talks to people who are addicted to doomsday scenarios ("how to prepare"... brr.. "HOW TO PREPARE!!!").. sleep in luxurious hotels, all thanks to YOUR generosity. Now even Jane Brugermeister is running a 75000 $ donation run. Are you kidding !? These people and their website does not deserve to be linked to such an excellent site as RealitySandwich is.I understand not everyone thinks the same, and nobody else may care that _I_ chose not to visit Project Camelot anymore, but I'd like to see how you could argument how the value of their work relates to the value of this site.Reality Sandwich is a fantastic site that opened my mind to many "alternative" subjects. But I find that RS consistently has a positive attitude and is written by people who have an ability to THINK and who do not promote misinformation or abuse of people's credulity. Project Camelot really doesn't deserve to appear in your columns, don't you feel that it just doesn't fit with the perspective of this site? I'm not against subjects such as UFO's, crop circles and all that (I love it in fact, and we all enjoyed those hoaxed moon landing articles).. but P.C. is of another kind. It's misinfo feeding on people's fears, credulity and addiction to not taking action with their own lives. :(

"The television time on the network had already been bought" (for ET disclosure). And we already have a date, an exact date. "It was one of these ritualisticly significant date, numerologically". Christ.. I'm only 1:23 in the video.Why just why is this garbage here on my beloved Reality Sandwich? I've been reading about UFO's already as a teenager,; more than 20 years ago. I'd like to think I am pretty open mindedn but to see this kind of videos here is sad :(

all you haters don't know anything about ETs or UFOs. How many of you people have read the Day after Roswell. I'm not saying this video ain't bunk, but don't be hating on Ufology. These beings be in our skies and manipulating our society, these beings are the inspiration of all the worlds religions. They are the earth keepers and btw as far as this video goes, I'll see it when it happens...

After watching the video, I have to conclude for myself that this man is not being honest with himself or anyone else. First of all, everything he says is hearsay; nothing from his own experience. Secondly, why does he feel he must cover part of his face when he's making these presentations? I tend to believe that it is because he knows he is being dishonest and is unable to face his audience. One last observation; the very vague and inprecise manner in which he describes what he has been told. While telling this story, he says "November 27th, if I remember it correctly, it's November 27th", and he also states "there were hundreds of thousands, or tens of thousands of people there". There is quite a difference between hundreds oif thousands and tens of thousands, seems to me he is trying to get his story straight in his own mind. Now, I do enjoy Reality Sandwich and I will continue to read the articles from this site that interest me, but this guy is not being honest in my opinion.