Support our Kickstarter

Immortal Critique

osama.jpg

In classic Immortal Technique style, the underground hip-hop artist's latest essay contextualizes the death of Osama Bin Laden and the "War on Terror" within the waves of frenzy that have been created since 9/11. The essay meticulously lists many of the inconsistencies that the fourth estate has fed to the public over the last nine and a half years.

While many Americans jump for joy as the bell tolls for Osama (as if the wicked witch were dead), Technique pulls the curtain of the public spectacle back to reveal a system of corruption and governmental negligence that refuses to be washed away. 

Ding dong, Bin Laden's "dead"...now what?

Immortal Technique's article is the first in a series, (I hope), of well-needed critiques about the current events transpiring before our eyes. 

 

http://m.xxlmag.com/entry/view/id/5558/pn/all/p/0/?KSID=6d26969e1dd8ccb4...

 

Image by ssoosay on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing.

 

 

Comments

Propaganda

Propaganda Anonymous propanon.com facebook.com/propa.non

Totally agree Zezt

We must all learn to see through the Propaganda

And this includes our own Propaganda

 I think Immortal TEchnique offers some great things to think about herein.

This is the type of writing that I wanna read in the NY Times.

And it's coming from a rapper. 

And with the Faux News bs about Common in the White House, we still see how some aspects of the media respond to Hip-Hop. 

Let's all see through the looking glass

Excellent find.

Thanks for the link. This article being found and accessed through Reality Sandwich...AWESOME! In my humble opinion it is a strong affirmation for this site's ability to act as a very reliable gateway for significant writing which is just not likely going to be found anywhere else. Thanks yo. David Wilcock is discussing his own shock at the possibility that perhaps this may indeed have been the real Osama. Based on testimony from his 'insider' contacts which he has alledgedly previously confirmed through a process of repeatedly cross-checking their submitted information for discrepencies. Whether any of his 'insiders' are indeed reliable as he states they are is obviously a matter up for debate.

So the story goes. (I am aware that mentioning this alternative may cause slight upset to some but to deny this possibility is to stray from a truly scientific attitude...lack of evidence is not counter-evidence unto itself.) It may have been his active role in conducting both the training and the organization of individuals who were performing attacks upon Iraqi oil fields and pipelines. This may have made him a valuable asset to the Old World Order as it secured rising oil prices for their now weakened financial institutions. Apparently no one who is profiting from oil prices remaining as high as they are has ever had the slightest intent of seeing Osama killed. Despite having knowledge of his whereabouts. The people performing these attacks believed they were doing the right thing by fighting the Great Satan through cutting off the oil supply. And to have the most idolized and despised anti-American figure himself among these groups would have been akin to having the American president walking among 'our' soldiers. It seems at the very least plausible to me. Some of David's 'insiders' were recently correct in stating a major step for official government disclosure would occur two weeks before it did. This manifested through the FBI releasing an entire assortment of classified UFO documents on their website. As well as the NSA releasing 42 documents on their own website after a court order was made demanding their release. Of course in no way is this potential explanation definite or provable. David Wilcock's opinion is the Obama administration performed this operation in complete confidentiality due to the extreme volatility involved with matters which could cause such a financial storm for oil porfiteers. He goes on to say that of course it is all beyond finding irrefutable evidence now. Had the photos even been released it would not have an effect on any of those who have made up their minds.  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning." -Ra