The Cracking Tower

The following article is an excerpt from The Cracking Tower: A Strategy for Transcending 2012 (North Atlantic Books).
Solve et Coagula
Jonah's refusal to follow the voice from within left him completely at the mercy of the unconscious. After that he could only suffer his fate. Such is man's vaunted freedom and hubris. Unless he accepts his own inner guidance, he becomes a mere puppet of fate. If he sets himself up against the inner voice, asserting that he is free to choose what he wants, he invariably becomes the victim of the dragon. Only when he voluntarily chooses that which he inexorably must do, has he any free will at all. For the command from within is his own inner law, and he disobeys it at his peril. -- M. Esther Harding, Psychic Energy
Shamanism is based upon a gnosis that most humans have forgotten. This gnosis is that we are eternal, multidimensional entities living an illusory mortal existence in three‐dimensional space. The human responsibility is to regain this gnosis and learn how to function fully in both physical and metaphysical realms. Powerful forces are constantly pushing us to a fuller realization of these potentials. Psychedelics can be extremely valuable tools in this Work, but they are easily abused. The reason our culture has a substance abuse problem is because we have lost our spiritual roots: not only do we lack culture‐specific protocols for the use of consciousness‐altering catalysts, we also have a tacit taboo against knowing who we are, and few viable strategies for discovery. Shamanism is one method, but it contains more than a few pitfalls.
"Shaman" is a title of earned power. Shamans are both revered and feared in tribal cultures -- outsiders to be reckoned with. In contemporary Western usage, however, the term has an aura of Dungeons & Dragons fantasy surrounding it. (There are abundant links between role‐playing computer games and psychedelic drug use in the perception of many would‐be shamans-an unfortunate combination.) Self‐sufficient invincibility is a popular fantasy of the ego, compensating for the perceived loss of personal empowerment in modern life. It is not at all surprising that this archetype is so appealing now-it is exhilarating to imagine oneself as a powerful wizard zooming around some inner rain forest, far from the bulldozers and toxic spillage-the urbanized junkyard existing outside of our heads.
The problem is that this is usually an egocentric position and the unguided ego makes a very deluded shaman. The ego neither initiates nor directs the shamanic work -- the call must come from within. This call from hyperspace comes in different forms, is ubiquitous, and is in no way confined to shamanic contexts. I don't know how many of us ever receive such a call, but when it comes, it is always unambiguous, and sometimes arrives via a psychedelic drug.
The first phase of any legitimate inner‐directed work is usually concerned with putting the ego in its proper place and is typically an intense ordeal of many years' duration. The classic accounts of shamanic dismemberment describe this process, which is not literal, but a metaphor for the complete rearrangement of one's psychic priorities. At the end of the ordeal one has been transformed into a wholly different being. As noted, mind‐manifesting drugs have the capacity to reveal your mind as either unified or fragmented, depending on where your head is at (which usually has very little to do with where your ego thinks it's at.) The highest revelation that psychedelics offer (the bottom line of all true religion) is that "we are all one." The gurus assert that anything less than this gnosis is illusion. The opposite of wholeness is separation from the whole: we see component parts rather than their integration. Such perception on psychedelics typically evokes a fear response: mind perceives itself as surrounded by entities regarded as "not‐me." That which is not me is a potential enemy, and fear of others is a perfectly valid response for anyone living on a planet where predator‐prey relationships determine survival.
Both realities are true: we are all One within the Mind of God, but we are also all separate bodies on planet Earth. It's the One‐Many koan again. The ability of psychedelic drugs to reveal both realities suggests a connection with one of the fundamental principles of alchemy: solve et coagula, et habebis magisterium ("separate and recombine, and you will have the masterpiece").
The true goal of the alchemical Great Work was not the transmutation of "lead into gold" of popular folklore, but the transformation of the alchemist'sconsciousness into a state of unified perception. The alchemical canon says: disassemble it, purify the parts, and then reassemble them in a new composition. In Jungian terms, you analyze (solve) your complexes, then recombine and synthesize them (coagula) into a harmonious whole. Whether regarded as individuation or shamanic dismemberment and recombination, it's the same process.
In modern practice, this often begins by coming to terms with your early childhood; then you learn to recognize how much your complexes inhibit your freedom. Having navigated those labyrinths, next you get a handle on your life work: you get in touch with your Essence (Self, Individuality, Causal Body) and reconcile your former ego illusions with its intent. It's an unending dialectical progression. Analysis and synthesis (solve et coagula), then, is a universal formula for completing the Great Work of Transformation. If you succeed at this, the final whole will be a totally different substance than the whole you started with. It goes without saying that the formula is deceptively easy to understand but extremely difficult to accomplish.
I am reminded of a famous Zen proverb: Before practicing Zen, mountains are mountains and rivers are rivers. While practicing Zen mountains are no longer mountains and rivers no longer rivers. After practicing Zen, mountains are mountains again and rivers are rivers again.
This is just another way of describing the solve et coagula formula of alchemy. First you deconstruct the mountains and rivers (which is to say, your everyday reality) to know them in their substance, then you put them back together again, purified of illusion. Actually, "you" don't do this; your Essence does it through you -- all that is required of the ego is disciplined cooperation, which is to say, devotion to the Work.
Another example: In 1846, when Henry Thoreau was at Walden Pond, there were millions of humans on the planet who lived lives as simple as his. In those days, any peasant in what today we call the "Third World" lived outwardly no differently than Thoreau. An anthropologist from another planet, comparing only their external lifestyles, would see no differences between them: they both chopped wood, they both carried water. Yet Thoreau was living in a much different reality than, say, your average European peasant. For both of them, mountains were mountains and rivers were rivers, but Thoreau's mountains and rivers were of a different quality of beingness. That's because he had attained a higher degree of gnosis. To switch metaphors again: he understood both the forest and the trees that made it up.
This verse from the Tao Te Ching bears repeating:
Oftentimes, one strips oneself of passion
In order to see the Secret of Life;
Oftentimes, one regards life with passion,
In order to see its manifest forms.
The "Secret of Life" is the gnosis that we are all one, that the highest reality is unitive. In alchemical terms, we cannot really know that unity, we cannot have true gnosis, until we have experienced all the "manifest forms"; only then can we claim to truly know the whole. The simple peasant, living in a state of nature, can be said to know a kind of wholeness, but it is a state of unconscious innocence. To comprehend any whole completely, it must be analyzed so that its component parts can be discerned. During this phase of the Work, by definition, mountains and rivers cannot be whole entities, but must be seen in their infinite parts.
In the beginning, psychedelics were crucial to my inner development. I can't imagine where I would be now if I'd never had the revelations that these substances offered me. In my case, the solve et coagula formula came backwards: my first LSD trip was one of samadhi, of complete harmonic unity. My journey began with the coagula portion of the equation. I now realize that my Essence was giving me an experience of the final goal of the Work: at that time of my life, I had no concept at all of what it was that I was seeking. Essence knew that once I'd experienced this state of awareness, I would never rest in this lifetime until I'd attained it permanently (I still haven't, by the way).
While I was under the influence of LSD the first time, mountains were mountains and rivers were rivers as described in the third clause of the proverb. This was enlightenment as attained by spiritual adepts. When I returned to consensus reality eight hours later, mountains were no longer mountains and rivers were no longer rivers; the world from which I'd started my trip had changed forever. You can't go home again after an experience like that. It goes without saying that I had a rough time reconciling the two realities. Thus begins the Great Work of Transformation.
My second acid trip showed me the solve half of the alchemical equation. It was the most terrifying experience of fragmented awareness I've ever known. My world was torn asunder, and nothing I could do would put it back together again. My greedy ego was seeking the total samadhi of my first LSD experience, but my Essence had a more profound lesson in mind. Mountains were definitely not mountains, and rivers were definitely not rivers: nothing, absolutely nothing in my environment was what it had been before. It was the complete deconstruction of ordinary reality. At that time, of course, I had no concept of the alchemist's solve et coagula equation. It was in trying to reconcile the two experiences that, years later, I came to understand their relationship to the alchemical secret of inner development, the solution to the mountains and rivers koan. (During this time it also began to dawn on me that Essence is an extremely demanding guru!)
Essence is that center of awareness residing in the unconscious psyche. As stated before, Essence is synonymous with Jung's concept of the Self, the Kabbalist's Individuality, and the Causal Body of Theosophy. Your Essence is the immortal portion of your awareness, quite distinct from the mortal ego, which will not last longer than this earthly incarnation. When Jim DeKorne dies, he will disappear from this planet forever and his life experience will be absorbed into his Essence, a far superior identity in hyperspace. The attainment of this relatively simple gnosis is one of the most crucial phases of the Work because the ego absolutely must transcend the illusion that it is the center of the psyche. Gradually, always painfully, one learns that not until ego and Self become integrated will they ascend to higher levels of awareness.
This level of integration is relatively rare during physical incarnation because it implies transcendence to a kind of god‐consciousness: we can experience it sometimes in mystical states and on psychedelics, but probably never do we operate from such consciousness all day, every day. Even Ramakrishna frequently returned from samadhi to interact with his disciples.
I met my Essence on an acid trip. It's worth quoting at length from Psychedelic Shamanism. This was my fourth major experience, and the one that has had by far the strongest impact on my life:
On the morning of February 18, 1979, I took LSD again after a gap of about three years. As I sat in my easy chair waiting for the effects of the drug to begin, I felt a sudden impulse to get up and remove an antique Mexican machete from where it had been hanging on the wall for at least a decade. Like many items used only for decoration, this one had by now become so familiar as to be invisible -- I don't recall having paid any real attention to it for years. Indeed, it was shamefully covered with dust. I'd purchased the machete in 1965 at the Toluca market outside of Mexico City. It was hanging in the back of a stall operated by a used‐tool‐and‐parts vendor who sold battered hammers, bent screwdrivers, grease‐caked crescent wrenches, and rusty motorcycle chains -- that sort of thing. The machete was obviously fairly old (I estimate early twentieth century, sometime around the Mexican revolution), and well used, with many nicks and scratches and a splintered handle. There is a dicho, or proverb engraved on the blade: Nada del mundo es verdad por lo que mi ojos ven, "Nothing in the world is true that meets my eyes," or, more freely, "Everything is an illusion." It's a curious saying-I've never thought of it as a Mexican Catholic sentiment; if anything, it sounds Buddhist.
For some reason, I wanted to hold this machete, and as the LSD began to alter my consciousness I held it tighter and tighter. It was beginning to manifest the energies of a "power object" and soon the machete morphed into a kind of psychic lightning rod for forces to enter my body -- at that point I don't think I could have let go of it if I'd wanted to. Now the drug was coming on strong and I was suddenly very, very stoned. The machete vibrated with authority and seemed to pull me from my chair, across the room and out the door into the yard, where I was forcibly thrown to my knees on the ground. For the first, and so far the only, time in my life I heard a distinctly clear voice speaking to me from within my own head. The voice was nothing that I could identify with as "me" or even a portion of "me." It was totally Other, and it asked a question: "Do you take responsibility?"
I didn't really know what that meant -- take responsibility for what? Yet I knew that it was important to say yes; taking responsibility was certainly a responsible" thing to do, and I've always believed in being responsible.
"Yes."
The energy level of the voice increased one full octave:"Do you take responsibility?!"
"Uh -- sure. Yes." I was deeply intoxicated, and quite confused by the repetition of the question.
Now the numinosity and power of the voice doubled again, becoming suddenly very, very scary. What was I dealing with here? Do you take responsibility?!!!"
"Yes! I take responsibility!" I had no idea what I was taking responsibility for, but I knew that I must be equal to it, whatever "it" was. Then I crossed the line into "something else" -- these goddamned acid trips! Why did I continue to do this to myself? Flashback replays of my second voyage into LSD terror. . . . It was now nothing less than the voice of God demanding: "DO YOU TAKE RESPONSIBILITY?!!!!"
I was no longer sure that I wanted that much responsibility, yet somehow I felt certain that if I'd said "no," I would have dropped dead on the spot. The voice's unstated implication was "Take responsibility or die!" In that state of consciousness I really believed it (I still do, by the way).
"Yes! Yes! I take responsibility!" The voice fell silent. I'd been dismissed. After a while I got to my feet and stumbled back into the house. The rest of the trip was relatively uneventful -- lots of somatic electro‐surging and cerebral drain cleaner boiling my brain with tidal waves of stars and sparks. A local FM radio station played a piece by Alan
Hovhaness: Mountains and Rivers without End -- powerful music to hear when on a
psychedelic, and another synchronicity not recognized until later. By late afternoon, I'd drifted back into normal awareness again. It was good to be back.
That night I went to bed somewhat washed‐out from the acid, but fully recovered and in consensus reality again. I'd been down for several hours, in fact. I had a dream: My machete was in front of me, hanging suspended in a pure void of infinite darkness. Etched on the blade, in place of the Spanish dicho, were Hebrew letters in living fire (I am not Jewish and can't read Hebrew, but do recognize the script). The machete disappeared and only the fiery letters remained suspended in the void. They began to move and reform themselves in the Roman alphabet to spell SEPHIROTH in fire. Then they disappeared, and only the void was left.
I awoke, my heart pounding anxiously, just like after my out‐of‐body experience. I arose from bed and paced around the house-what did "Sephiroth" mean? I looked it up in Webster's Third New International Dictionary -- no such word. This was the most powerful dream I'd ever had -- a once‐in‐a‐lifetime kind of dream. It was easily as numinous as my encounter with the voice, but unfortunately, I didn't know what it meant any more than I knew what it was I'd taken responsibility for. It was at least two weeks before I got a clue.
Aimlessly browsing in a Santa Fe bookstore one day, I saw a book with the title Dictionary of Mysticism and the Occult. I turned to the proper page and found: "Sephiroth: the ten emanations of God in the Jewish Kabbalah." I was stunned; I knew the Kabbalah was some kind of Jewish mystical system, but that was as far as my knowledge went at the time. How could my unconscious psyche come up with information that I had never consciously encountered in my life? (This was 1979; I was living on a homestead in the New Mexico boondocks, and snobbishly disdained all doctrines depending on arcane jargon for their comprehension.)
From there I obtained some Kabbalistic textbooks to study: I forget the reading sequence now, but Dion Fortune's The Mystical Qabalah and Gareth Knight's A Practical Guide to Qabalistic Symbolism stand out in my mind as particularly seminal texts. ("Kabbalah" is spelled in at least five variants, "Qabalah" being one commonly used in England.) It was in Knight's book, over a year later, that I encountered another synchronicity for this experience.
Without trying to explain the intricacies of Kabbalistic philosophy, of which there are many (to say the least!), I discovered that my machete/voice adventure corresponded to the seventeenth path on the Tree of Life. This path is called: "A path of choice, the crossroads of life meet here." (i.e., "Do you take responsibility?") The Tarot arcanum symbolically connected with this path is The Lovers, and the Hebrew word‐letter for The Lovers is zayin, which means "sword." (A machete is certainly a kind of sword.) The drug ergot is also closely associated with this path, and LSD, of course, is an ergot derivative.
That's a fair amount of synchronicity compressed into an initiation that is still not totally clear to me, but I am apparently in good company: years after my "Kabbalah trip," I found an observation concerning LSD psychotherapy in Stanislav Grof's book, Realms of the Human Unconscious. He describes here how others under the influence of LSD have experienced similar revelations to my own: Individuals unfamiliar with the Kabbalah have had experiences described in the Zohar and Sepher Yetzirah and have demonstrated a surprising familiarity with Kabbalistic symbols.
Lesson: It was this experience that finally convinced me that I was involved in an unfolding inner process. I eventually accepted the concept that the conscious "me" was but a portion of a greater reality emanating from what I experienced as my unconscious psyche. Somewhere within this undifferentiated "unconscious" was a separate intelligence ("me" on a higher octave) able to manipulate information superior to anything I knew here in space‐time.
In Jungian terms, my ego had just been introduced to my Self. At least that's how I interpreted it after many years of studying the Perennial Philosophy. Meditation on the sequence and interrelationship of meanings in this experience can yield profound insights about the structure of reality and the nature of the Work:
"Nada del mundo es verdad por lo que mi ojos ven."
"Do you take responsibility?"
Mountains and Rivers without End.
"Sephiroth: the ten emanations of God in the Jewish Kabbalah."
This experience was an initiation, a beginning. The very nature of the revelations indicates the commencement of a journey. I have yet to experience anything resembling an end to it.
c 2009 by Jim DeKorne. Reprinted by permission of publisher.
Tweet- 3-15-10
- Jim DeKorne's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
The ultimate Gnostic being
Just a few hours ago I was reading this from "The Life Divine":
- The first step of self-realization is to enthrone the soul, the psychic individual in place of the ego.
-The next step is to become aware of the eternal self, which liberates and universalizes.
-The third step is to know the Divine Being, the transcendent, the Cosmic Being.
-We thus become channels to his Shakti, and act according to its dictates or her light and power within us.
-We thus become one with others by knowing our psychic nature, universalizing, and opening to the transcendent Divine.
-Beyond that, an ultimate truth consciousness must change all parts of our nature; enabling us to become an instrument of the Supernature.
***
Attaining spiritualized mind does not only give us vast knowledge, i.e. integral knowledge, breaking the bonds of our essential Ignorance born of creation, but it also brings with it an idea force and power to enter us from these higher spiritual mind planes and the various parts of our being -- mental, vital, and physical. This is essentially the spiritual transformation that occurs after the psychic transformation, which in turn establishes the conditions of the possibility of the emergence of the Divine Gnosis into our being -- i.e. the supramental change; the descent of the supramental Force that transforms our nature into the ultimate Gnostic being.
Sri Aurobindo
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
olà! jim
All the air and depth of revelationary initiation
part of everything
When I’m dead and gone
My immortal home
Will hold me in its bosom
Safe and cold
No more desires
Will light their fires
Or disturb my immaculate calm
And the birds of the air
And the beasts of the soil
And the fishes of the desperate seas
Will know who I am
And our substance will expand
As part of everything
Jolie Holland - Goodbye California
Wonderful, wise piece
The consequences of failing to dismantle the ego on the journey are dire: madness, violence, and self-destruction. Take a look at Charles Manson, Jim Jones, or Hong Xiuquan (documented in the book "God's Chinese Son.").
Thank you for being an example of one who chose the path of life.
digression re: "regressings" or falling in love with your planet
Mandala
Mandala
Thanks for your great
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
Heaven and Hell
Fuel for the ego...
Fuel for the ego
Normal 0 false false fals
spiritual hierarchies
Outdated caste system?
Why is there such a deep connection for you between social status, elite and peasant, and spiritual concepts, which are available to everyone according to various traditions across all cultures, and therein bound by but not limited to, the social networks inherent in each? To divide the human experience between the rich and the poor seems overtly reductionist and places exclusions and illusory parameters on states of consciousness. It seems that this is akin to chopping down all the trees in an attempt to see the forest.
No one but you has made the assumption that Thoreau was superior to the peasants of his time, although you attribute this assumption to others. What was being pointed out is a qualitative ‘difference,’ which cannot be discredited nor fully embraced because, as you’ve pointed out, true history is suppressed. I mention history only to typify that there’s a lack of evidence for what the ‘peasants’ (which is being used only as a designation within the discussion thus far) experience was truly like. Could it have been entirely akin to Thoreau’s... yes. Entirely different... yes. Vastly surpass... yes. None of these? The truth is, we will never know. What we do know is what Thoreau’s experience was like, at least in part, because of his writings.
And it seems like walking into a pitfall to lambaste Gnosticism and mystical schools for being elite/elitist. It seems that the Gnostic sect was morelikely a pariah at the time that the early church was becoming more orthodox. Thus, it’s unclear how these men and women, as the Gnostics respected women more than the orthodoxy, could be seen to hold a ‘mystical inflationary attitude,’ while they were the ones acting with humility to preserve teachings they felt were being bastardized and distorted into a hierarchy.
Further, an ‘unconscious innocence’ is not the same as your attribution of ‘being childishly unconscious.’ It is your designation, and not that of Jim DeKorne, that is patronizing and misleading. Your dismissal of the possibilityof attaining wisdom and clarity, and *remembering* our interconnection, along class lines negates the very opportunity for doing so by moving beyond theillusory constrictions that bind humanity, i.e. class distinctions. Your designation of social standing is an overarching precedent for enlightened thought and action which is solely the right of ‘peasants,' whoever they are, and entirely dismissive of everyone else.
Is it all so nefarious?
Who is this ‘great white guru with great Gnostic knowledge’ that you’re speaking of? In your response, that’s quite confusing. Are you speaking here only of Thoreau? It seems to be a more general aphorism or an archetype that is somehow an affront to everyone and a representation of all that’s evil, or in the very least, false.
“...If he sets himself up against the inner voice, asserting that he is free to choose what he wants, he invariably becomes the victim of the dragon."
To me, this is about the limiting ego’s attempts to dominate and control through the illusion of “asserting that he is free to choose what he wants.” In so far as you’re quoting, this seems to be the problem. The ego appears to be the grossest form of human nature from which the illusion of our existence is perpetuated. And that’s why it is so difficult for us to peal away the layers, moving from being ego-based (fear-based?) through the unconscious or subconscious or whatever other sub-division, towards revealing our true Self, and the Unity of Everything, which I understand to be enlightenment. The Self, in this manner, has absolutely no need to bring under its control the dragon or the serpent. But if the ego ignores the inner voice of the Self then the unconscious aspects in our nature become the dragon to consume the infantile ego to show it how feeble it really is.
But in response to how it's been set up (the ‘unconscious’) it does seem like an apt metaphor only in-so-far as the ego’s fears of the unconscious need to be overcome, as the unconscious is not some dragon that needs to be killed off (though that is how the metaphor is extended), but rather recognized and embraced as a powerful ally once it’s understood for what it is, a way to move beyond all limiting beliefs towards the Self. The fear of the dragon/serpent is just a fear of fear and the unknown.
And as for being symbols of the patriarch, the dragon and serpent extend far beyond the monotheistic religions.
Never-the-less, there’s still a question which lingers...who are “those deemed ‘close to unconsciousness’” you mention and who determines whether or not any individual, let alone a group of people arbitrarily lumped together, is close to this unconsciousness? It seems that the only qualification is not following whomever is this ‘great white guru,’ but that does not clarify anything let alone justify, as you’ve put forth, the creation of some hierarchy in which people are subjugated to inflationary attitudes.
“In this description 'millions' of people are all categorized as some kind of ignore-ant backdrop for the praise of the 'great white guru of great gnostic knowledge' Henry Thoreau.”
Hmm... not really. All that was being pointed out, as I saw it, is that the living conditions, i.e. the physical daily environment, most resembles the living conditions which would be characterized as “Third World” today, without all the modern gadgets and accoutrements and technology that are so intrinsically linked with American culture. I’m not sure how this was meant to be demeaning to anyone living there in this case. But that does not mean that I’m ignorant of human history and the subjugation of groups of people toothers, especially in relation to the native peoples of every single continent.
I would ask, though, that you don’t make base assumptions, as in “WHY are ‘their’ lives not AS authentic as yours (mine),etc.” Did I ever say that their lives are not as authentic as mine? Did I ever make this insinuation? To make that leap is like jumping off a cliff with no parachute. I understand that this is more of a rhetorical question, but at the same time it’s very insulting. Every single person’s life and experience, regardless of their socio-political-economic tag, which seems to be a giant pigeon-hole here, is absolutely as authentic as any another’s. That’s not once been in dispute for me.
"Unconscious innocence"---that is what adults call children, "innocent", and then abuse them. It is actually happening now in the 'education' system, and millions of homes. So how convenient it is to call millions of grownups the same. It means you can abuse them.”
I honestly have no idea what this means, especially the last two sentences. Please help me to understand what you’re getting at here. I have a feeling of what it might be: that the school systems are socialization/indoctrination factories, which I cannot fully embrace but cannotfully discount either because I have had that rare teacher who told me to challenge what I was being taught and those people were within that structure. But do you really think this is some nefarious plot by every adult perpetrated against every single child? That every adult is an abuser in some shape or form? Wouldn’t that negate the efforts of people who challenge the schoolsystem and want it changed?
It seems like the effort to point out all of the interconnecting patterns is serving only to reinforce those patterns by trying to find them and applying them to so much. I'm not saying that you aren't justified in doing so, but isn't it anathema to your intention(s) for doing so to begin with?
BTW, I entirely agree with you last two paragraphs (from Taoism on...) and will only repeat something I’ve found meaning in... “Two men look out the same prison bars; one sees mud and the other stars.”
PS... No, I don't see a caste system everywhere. I didn't know I should be looking for one...
Hmmm...
Isn't there ever an opportunity to acknowledge the past, recognize the ills which have been done, and somehow learn to heal the past so we can start to experience a freer present?
If not, then where do we go from here?
Applying the reductionist dichotomy of superior and inferior to nearly every instance is a perpetuation of what I understand to be duality, and it doesn't seem to be serving any purpose other than making the BARS thicker and less likely to be surpassed. It doesn't let anything exist solely as Being, but starts to pin things into corners of black/white, positive/negative, good/evil, superior/inferior. And this seems to come from a perspective in which other alternate perspectives are deemed degrading (as in how you refer to innocence and your distrust of anyone who may call another such) while the mention of innocence, in itself, may be altogether... innocent in intent and not meant to degrade anyone, as the word implies a state of purity/openness/ripeness/etc. (And I do not understand how innocence, as a state of mind, is relegated to an attribute of the racist south. If indeed innocence was ever used to describe black people in this context in that era, it was obviously used incorrectly and that's not the fault of the word or the state of mind but the people who ignorantly used something implying purity.)
And in this state (back to innocence), or return to this state, through various means (prayer/meditation/dancing/drumming/fasting/entheogens/spontaneously/etc.) the ego is set aside to allow the inner voice, not superior inner voice, to be heard. This, as I understand it, is a Universal/God/Unified voice and is not relegated to one system of belief over another. I in no way see how a connection to this inner voice would call for one to ever exercise any abuse on another being, being a voice of love and compassion, nor see how anyone could feel superior through the hearing of this voice because, from everything that I understand of it, it is also the voice of humility (since it's not ego-driven) and our deepest connection which enables us to move from our illusory perception towards the Tao/Buddha Consciousness/Christ Consciousness, or any other designation thereof, which are all descriptions of the same experience in consciousness. This moves beyond the paradigms of righteousness that may be experienced by the religiously devout who wish to proselytize, and whom I suspect you are calling out in your analyzation of hierarchies/etc. But in no way does this exclude them from, hopefully, becoming free enough to have such an experience of hearing this inner voice.
I wish also to let you know, that as far as the education thing goes, I understand that Gatto has some very valid perspective(s) on the subject matter, and quite a few that I happen to agree with as well, but that in no way means that he is the only voice in the matter. That veers into the territory of espousing dogma... his opinion is not the only truth in these matters.
"But as you know, in your creation myth from the Book of Genesis..." This is not my creation myth, thank you. Please, again, don't make these leaps or attempt to put words into someone's mouth when they have not written them. And I am well aware of what you're speaking of regarding the interpretation regarding Genesis and the Tree of Knowledge, the serpent embodying wisdom, etc. Please don't assume ignorance of others. In the manner you've outlined, it makes you seem superior and others inferior... much like we've all been deluded in our attempts to remember and recreate our connection to whatever the divine essence of life is, but we're all misguided. This is an ongoing, searching experience and maybe we're all going to be walking on false paths until we hear our inner voice.
But only BARS, not ever a glimpse of the mud or the stars?
where?
Please show me where I have assumed, in this discussion, your ignorance... or an instance in which I've exhibited any inflamed sense of superiority.
If I have, I apologize.
Or are you saying that you are superior?
Psilocybin Samadhi
Inspired by the piece and comments
I enjoyed reading "The Cracking Tower" by Jim DeKorne. I particularly like the alchemical ideas of transformation he shared. The comments afterwards led me to some thoughts...
I feel this is true: that the change of the era and change in ourselves will be when victims will no longer be victims and those who oppress will no longer be oppressors. I don't see it as a matter of "fighting" the old status quo, but a matter of letting go of the status quo, and also the tally of offenses; letting go of seeing wrong-doing everywhere. The knots will be loosened not by undoing them, but because the knots don't exist on another level.
I'd rather be for something than against something else...seeing bars and suspicious of others. No one else can be our oppressors or captors, not really, not at the soul level, unless we want that situation in our lives. It takes two to tangle. (I was going to say "tango"!) If you don't want conflict, why give that power to someone? (If you do want it, that is another story. There is also the enjoyment of the spar)
In this world people arrange themselves into opposing camps (in politics, religion, around specific issues, etc). It seems we come to a standstill fighting over who is right. I'm not talking "history". I'm talking NOW. I'd rather be free and see -- there are no bars -- there are no knots, but those we create and/or agree to. I don't know if I've explained what I'm trying to say... This quote keeps coming to me on the matter -- "If the red slayer thinks he slays...he knows not the subtle ways I keep and pass and turn again."
Sozo
great article!
Thanks mom
However, after reading his
While searching for
During one of my first
I in no way see how a
I tried acid for the first
thanks
hi this is very good post
Viagra
End-of-the-world paranoia
:)
The Cracking Tower offers an
Self‐sufficient
The reason our culture has a
Shamanism makes sense
I don't see it as a matter
I was aware for the 1st time
2012
Nothing will happen in 2012, maybe just Los Angeles will leave us....
periodontal diseasequite an interesting
Love it :)
End-of-the-world paranoia
The Cracking Tower - 2012
love it
i really love your blog contents, the way you put up the things. I’ve read the topic with great interest and definitely will stick your blog routinely for other great posts. thanks :0
online games
Dog Bad Breath Remedies