Support our Kickstarter

Controlled Supplements

supplement large.jpg

The Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 was introduced by Senators John McCain and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) "to amend the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act to more effectively regulate dietary supplements that may pose safety risks unknown to consumers." If passed, the bill would overturn the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), which determined that dietary supplements are to be regulated as food, not as drugs.  This meant that dietary supplements were not held to the same FDA standards as pharmaceuticals and could be marketed without FDA approval. McCain proposes to end the supplement industry's self-regulation by bringing it under FDA supervision. S. 3002 would require that supplement manufacturers register the locations of their facilities, a list of all products and ingredients, and copies of all supplement labels with an FDA secretary as well as maintain a "scientifically reasonable substantiation file" with evidence that their products are "reasonably expected to be safe." This shifts the burden of proof from the FDA to the supplement companies themselves. In addition, the bill requires manufacturers to submit "adverse event reports" documenting "non-serious adverse events," and greatly expands the FDA's recall authority. To ensure compliance, dietary supplement facilities must "obtain adequate written evidence" of registration "for review and inspection by the Secretary upon request."

Although McCain assured Congress that "legitimate dietary supplement companies should have nothing to fear from this legislation," organizations like the Alliance for Natural Health and the Natural Products Association are sounding the alarm about this "capricious war against food supplements." Opponents of S. 3002 say that the bill doesn't address the problem of illegal steroids as McCain purports, but does create unnecessary and cumbersome administrative hurdles for supplement suppliers. The Alliance for Natural Health states that the end result is "the consolidation of the supplement industry into a few big companies . . .[that would] very likely be owned by drug companies." More objections to the bill suggest that the creation of "voluminous safety dossiers" and an "approved list of ingredients" gives the FDA authority to arbitrarily ban supplements or reclassify them as drugs in order to be more closely scrutinized. There is even concern that imposing restrictions on supplements is a step towards harmonizing the United States with the Codex Alimentarius, an internationally recognized food code backed by the World Trade Organization and agribusiness giants.

In short, the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 increases federal oversight of supplements ostensibly to protect consumers from dangerous substances. While it's true that regulations on the supplement industry are lax under DSHEA, it is uncertain whether increased regulation will actually protect consumers or simply hamper the sale of alternative health products. Given its history of approving questionable drugs (such as Vioxx and Rezulin), its rejection of medical marijuana research, and its financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry, it is important to question the FDA's partiality and of course, follow the money. You can read the bill here, McCain's introduction here, and sign the petition to stop the DSSA from passing here.

Image: "CRW_5121" by Teresa Stanton on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons licensing. 

Comments

What can we really do?

This both angers and frightens me, because many depend on unregulated supplements for quality of life, or even life itself. How about they fund a nonprofit organization that certifies manufacturers who want to voluntarily demonstrate excellence in quality and purity? Of course, this Act isn't an act of altruism, so I don't know what good our ideas are. What good is a petition really going to do, with millions of people already flaming any number of congressional behaviors at any time? What is a more effective way? I don't understand the world of politics, so that is an open question.

I Ask the Same Question All the Time

I am with you on this. I don't really know what actions we can take anymore either. It seems that most reaction, at best, make the news or a local paper and then dies away with very little if anything at all being changed. We have no shortage of news and documentaries about "What's Wrong", it might be time for a panel to convene and discuss "What Now" and "What Next"

www.sniffcode.com

Tiptoeing Towards Totalitarianism!

A stealth maneuver by Big Pharma to 'Protect' the consumer whether they want protecting or not. When I first heard about this I found it hard to believe but unfortunately its true.

           http://www.redicecreations.com/

Pharma Lobbies

Pharma lobbies write the legislation (because congress is too busy campaigning for re-election) and then Pharma pays congress to sign it. That's our democracy at work!

Sign the petition to help!!!

 Sen. John McCain is introducing a horrific bill, the "Dietary Supplement Safety [sic] Act of 2010" (DSSA) designed to end your access to high potency supplements by giving the bloated, corrupt and dangerous FDA MORE power to destroy supplement access. This bill is absolutely NOT to be confused with DSHEA, the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act (1994), which says nutrients are food and, as food, you can have them in any form - and any amount - you like. If we allow DSSA to pass, we will be living - and dying - under something very much like the European Food Supplements Directive's anti-supplement restrictions, implementing Codex Alimentarius' dietary supplements and nutritional restrictions, to the "T" -- effective as close to immediately as the Fraud and Death Administration can manage it. Listen to the Dr. Rima Reports as Dr. Rima interviews Sarah Schons, MD, a renowned German Immunologist practicing natural medicine in Germany: . Food Supplements are going the way of the dodo in the EU. The US is clearly next unless we act now - in massive numbers, once for each member of your family.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KE...

This is what we need

In my view, this is a long time coming. This bill is about safety. It forces the people who are involved in "manufacturing, packaging, holding, distributing, labeling, or licensing" of supplements to do three things: register the product with the FDA, provide literature to show that the supplement is safe, and report non-serious adverse events. Each unit on this supply chain would get this information from the previous unit. For example, if you wanted to distribute garlic capsules, you would ask for safety information (which, on a common product such as this, would be readily available, or even re-searchable by one's self through Pubmed) from the distributor that sells the bulk product. The distributor would do the same from the packager, etc. This would be required for all new dietary supplements. This would ensure that those long aisles of products in the health store are actually safe to use, or are labeled with appropriate safety information. This wouldn't standardize the products (for example, requiring them to prove that there actually is specified concentration of product per capsule) but would go a long way towards making sure that natural products that are dangerous (see betel nuts) are not haphazardly distributed. For example, non-serious adverse events could be: diarrhea, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, rash, sedation, insomnia, dry mouth, photosensitivity. These are possible reactions from anything that you ingest, part of the placebo response, or directly from the effect of the drug on someone's unique system. Serious reactions: death, stroke, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiomyopathy, anaphylaxis, arrhythmias, seizures, neutropenia, coagulopathy, bleeding, development of cancer. Right now, it is theoretically possible to pick up an item off the shelf that could cause these things. There are risks to taking any drug, even "natural" substances. Since most of our pharmacopoeia is not invented by science, but extracted from nature, we know of the power provided by certain molecules found in the plant and animal kingdoms and its effects on our physiology. While most of the supplements available are safe, and are safe for most people, they can still cause reactions, and they may be more dangerous in certain patient populations. I think that it is better to be on the safe side, and requiring those that distribute or make a product to provide documentation that it has been in use for many years and/or there is no unnecessary risk in taking the product.

Troll Begone.

  You are obviously a paid shill  for Big Pharma. You only joined RS an hour ago with the sole intention of spreading your cretinous Dis-Info.

Nice try Bozo. Thanks for your BS input, but we know what is going on in the world and we recognize Dis-Information when we see it

       http://www.redicecreations.com/

Actually, I'm a long time

Actually, I'm a long time reader of Reality Sandwich, yet just created a name because I was motivated to provide my viewpoint on this article.  With a divergent opinion to what had already been said, one would think that mixed viewpoints are welcome and expected in an environment such as this, were people pride themselves on not necessarily "going with the flow" of what is around them, and being open to new ideas and perspectives, even if they ultimately do not agree with them.

Now that you've flagged my article, and thrown ad hominems, perhaps you could actually reply to what I said.

 

With Light.....